1
Sihao Cheng, Jeffery Cummings, Brice Ménard The Johns Hopkins University High-Mass White Dwarfs in Gaia DR2: the Q Branch and WD-WD Merger Rate Figure 1: The HR Diagram of WDs in Gaia DR2, color-coded by transverse velocities. The Q branch is marked by red labels. The fraction of fast-moving WDs (v T >70 km/s) in each region is also remarked. Figure 2: A sketch of the Q-delay scenario (along a cooling sequence). On the Q branch, the slowing- down of cooling creates both a number density enhancement and a delay (t phot < t true ). Figure 3: Checking the goodness of fitting of velocity distribution. The model also fits well for the other component of transverse velocity v B. generic pop. Q-delayed pop. merger pop. Q-delay no yes no merger delay no yes or no yes The idea: two age indicators: dynamical age t dyn from velocities — older stars move more randomly photometric age t phot from HR diagram, via a generic “standard” WD model The difference t dyn - t phot comes from: Q-delay merger delay these two delays can be distinguished by their different delay distributions. 1. What is the white dwarf Q branch? an over-density of high-mass WDs discovered by Gaia DR2 we find a high-velocity excess on the branch created by a slow-down of cooling of some WDs on the branch (fig. 2) Table 1: Three populations of WDs with different delay scenarios. Results: 1. the Q-delay is longer than 8 Gyr and applies to only 7% of all high-mass WDs. So, standard cry- stallization is not enough to explain this high- mass branch. 2. WD-WD mergers account for 12-25% of high- mass WDs, corresponding to a merger rate of with 30% uncertainty in the mass range shown in Fig. 1. 2.3 × 10 14 M 1 yr 1 Model: a Bayesian model, statistically constraining the Q branch properties and WD-WD merger rate three WD populations: the generic “single star evolution + standard cooling (including crystallization)” population and two other populations with delays (Tab. 1) 2% 3% 10 % v T > 70 km s 1 v T > 70 km s 1 v T > 70 km s 1 We use transverse velocities and the HR diagram to constrain: 1. the Q branch properties 2. the WD-WD merger rate 2. The WD-WD merger related to type-Ia supernova producing a fraction of high-mass WDs the merger rate is not well constrained from observations

Cheng poster 3 - Space Telescope Science Instituteofox/posters2019/posters/cheng_poster.pdf · Title: Cheng poster 3 Created Date: 20190415214855Z

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cheng poster 3 - Space Telescope Science Instituteofox/posters2019/posters/cheng_poster.pdf · Title: Cheng poster 3 Created Date: 20190415214855Z

Sihao Cheng, Jeffery Cummings, Brice Ménard The Johns Hopkins UniversityHigh-Mass White Dwarfs in Gaia DR2: the Q Branch and WD-WD Merger Rate

Figure 1: The HR Diagram of WDs in Gaia DR2, color-coded by transverse velocities. The Q branch is marked by red labels. The fraction of fast-moving WDs (vT>70 km/s) in each region is also remarked.

Figure 2: A sketch of the Q-delay scenario (along a cooling sequence). On the Q branch, the slowing-down of cooling creates both a number density enhancement and a delay (tphot < ttrue ).

Figure 3: Checking the goodness of fitting of velocity distribution. The model also fits well for the other component of transverse velocity vB.

generic pop. Q-delayed pop. merger pop.

Q-delay no yes no

merger delay no yes or no yes

The idea: two age indicators:

• dynamical age tdyn from velocities — older stars move more randomly

• photometric age tphot from HR diagram, via a generic “standard” WD model

The difference tdyn - tphot comes from: • Q-delay • merger delay • these two delays can be distinguished by

their different delay distributions.

1. What is the white dwarf Q branch? • an over-density of high-mass WDs discovered

by Gaia DR2 • we find a high-velocity excess on the branch • created by a slow-down of cooling of some

WDs on the branch (fig. 2)

Table 1: Three populations of WDs with different delay scenarios.

Results: 1. the Q-delay is longer than 8 Gyr and applies to

only 7% of all high-mass WDs. So, standard cry-stallization is not enough to explain this high-mass branch.

2. WD-WD mergers account for 12-25% of high-mass WDs, corresponding to a merger rate of

with 30% uncertainty in the mass range shown in Fig. 1.

2.3 × 10−14 M−1⊙ yr−1

Model: • a Bayesian model, statistically constraining the Q branch

properties and WD-WD merger rate • three WD populations: the generic “single star evolution +

standard cooling (including crystallization)” population and two other populations with delays (Tab. 1)

2 %

3 %

10 %vT > 70 km s−1

vT > 70 km s−1

vT > 70 km s−1

We use transverse velocities and the HR diagram to constrain:

1. the Q branch properties 2. the WD-WD merger rate

2. The WD-WD merger • related to type-Ia supernova • producing a fraction of high-mass WDs • the merger rate is not well constrained

from observations