CIVL 444 S214 Outline

  • Upload
    has960

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

civl44

Citation preview

  • 1

    School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering Subject Code: CIVL444 Subject name: CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN Pre-requisites: CIVL361 Geomechanics 1, CIVL311 Structural Design 1, CIVL322 Hydraulics and

    Hydrology Credit points: 6 Offered: Spring Session, 2014, Wollongong Campus Subject Outline On successful completion of this subject students should have: (i) gained experience in conceptual design incorporating a systems approach; (ii) gained the ability to break down complex problems into smaller, more readily handled components; (iii) gained experience in working in design teams and accepting responsibilities; (iv) incorporated significant components of prior learning into a large project. Subject Coordinator Dr. Lip Teh Faculty of Engineering & Information Sciences, Building 4, Room G35 Telephone +61 2 4221 3564 Facsimile +61 2 4221 3238 Email [email protected] Consultation times

    Tuesday: 13:30-15:30 Friday: 15:30-17:30

    Lecturers A/Prof. Shuqing Yang Faculty of Engineering & Information Sciences, Building 4, Room G39 Telephone +61 2 4221 3070 Facsimile +61 2 4221 3238 Email [email protected] Consultation times

    Tuesday : 14:30-16:30 Thursday: 14:30-16:30

    Dr. Martin Liu Faculty of Engineering & Information Sciences, Building 4, Room 126 Telephone +61 2 4221 3035 Facsimile +61 2 4221 3238 Email [email protected] Consultation times

    Tuesday : 10:30-12:30 Friday: 10:30-12:30

    Guest Lecturers Charishma Kaliyanda; David Bell; Jason Surjadinata Tutors Dr Nadeesha Gamage Dr Veysel Yazici Mr Chazath Kaliboullah

  • 2

    NOTE: Students will be contacted throughout the Session via UoW SOLS Mail with important information relating to this subject. Learning Outcomes

    No Learning Outcomes

    UoW Engineering Graduate Capabilities (see Note)

    i) Demonstrate how to apply conceptual design and detailed design skills to a capstone design project. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

    ii) Use analogous and feasible cost estimation techniques to prepare convergent cost estimates. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

    iii) Appreciate the inter-relations between the structural, geotechnical, hydraulic and environmental factors that govern design solutions.

    1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10

    iv) Recognise the limitations of theory when applied to practical design problems, and appreciate the relevance of quality and risk management during and after construction.

    1, 4, 5, 7, 9

    v) Work in a consulting team environment. 7 vi) Demonstrate professional abilities and achievements. 5

    University Graduate Attributes and Engineering Graduate Capabilities UOW general Graduate Qualities

    Specific Faculty of Engineering & Information Sciences Graduate Capabilities

    Informed Have a sound knowledge of an area of study or profession and understand its current issues, locally and internationally. Know how to apply this knowledge. Understand how an area of study has developed and how it relates to other areas.

    1 Professional knowledge, grounding & awareness

    Independent learners Engage with new ideas and ways of thinking and critically analyse issues. Seek to extend knowledge through ongoing research, enquiry and reflection. Find and evaluate information, using a variety of sources and technologies. Acknowledge the work and ideas of others.

    2 Information literacy, gathering & processing 3 Research, analysis & evaluation

    Problem solvers Take on challenges and opportunities. Apply creative, logical and critical thinking skills to respond effectively. Make and implement decisions. Be flexible, thorough, innovative and aim for high standards.

    4 Problem solving skills

    Effective communicators Articulate ideas and convey them effectively using a range of media. Work collaboratively and engage with people in different settings. Recognise how culture can shape communication.

    5 Written communication 6 Oral communication 7 Teamwork

    Responsible Understand how decisions can affect others and make ethically informed choices. Appreciate and respect diversity. Act with integrity as part of local, national, global and professional communities.

    8 Respect for views, values, culture of others 9 Ethics and Professionalism 10 Sustainability, societal & environmental impact

  • 3

    Attendance Requirements The University Code of Practice Students states that it is the responsibility of students to attend all lectures, tutorials, seminars and practical work as stipulated in the subject outline. Method of delivery Face to face lectures Study time 12 hours per week including class attendance Lecture/tutorial/practical times Lecture Fri 13:30-15:30 20.2 Tutorial Fri 15:30-17:30 20.2 Part A. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Design - Weeks 1 to 4 Part B. Structural Design - Weeks 5 to 8 Part C. Geotechnical Design - Weeks 9 to 13 Recent Improvements The three parts have been rationalised so that the course starts with Part A Hydrologic and Hydraulic Design, and completes with Part C Geotechnical Design. References (A) Hydraulic Design:

    Chadwick, A.J. and Morfett, J. (1993) "Hydraulics in Civil and Environmental Engineering London, 2nd edition E & FN Spon, New York.

    Engineers Australia, "Australian Rainfall and Runoff-A guide to flood estimation" (2 Vol.) Ladson, A. R. (2008) Hydrology: An Australian Introduction, Oxford University Press. NAASRA (1989), "Bridge Waterways, Hydrology and Design", Technical Report, Editor P. Charles.

    NAASRA working group. (B) Structural Design:

    RMS (2012) Bridge Aesthetics Design Guidelines to Improve the Appearance of Bridges in NSW, Roads and Maritime Services, New South Wales. (available free from www.rta.nsw.gov.au/.../rms_bridge_aesthetics_guidelines_2012.pdf )

    CalTrans (2010) Bridge Design Aids, California Department of Transportation, USA (available free from http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/techpubs/manual/bridgemanuals/bridge-design-aids/bda.html)

    (C) Geotechnical Design: Bowles, J. E. (1996), Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill, New York. Indraratna, B. and Chu, J. (2005) Ground Improvement Case Histories, Elsevier. Hausmann, M.R. (1990) Engineering Principles of Ground Modification, McGraw-Hill. Guo, W. D. (2012), Theory and Practice of Pile Foundations, Boca, Raton, London, and New York,

    CRC press, http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9780415809337 These recommended readings are not intended as an exhaustive list and that students should use the Library catalogue and databases to locate additional resources. University and Faculty Policies Students should make themselves aware of the University and/or Faculty Policies regarding plagiarism, special consideration, supplementary examinations and other educational issues and student matters. Further information can be found in the Faculty Policy document available online.

  • 4

    ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES Due Date Assessment Task SPA Factor Applied? Weightings Learning Outcomes

    12 Sep Team Report Part A Yes 25% i - v

    17 Oct Team Report Part B Yes 25% i - v

    7 Nov Student CPEng Report N/A 25% vi

    14 Nov Team Report Part C Yes 25% i - v

    TOTAL 100 % i - vi Assessment will be based on the team reports for the design assignment, which will be submitted during Parts A, B and C of the subject. Students will work in teams of 6, and will submit team reports (one for each team), and individual Student Chartered Professional Engineer reports. There will be no final exam. The team reports in Parts A, B and C constitute 75% of the total mark for the subject. In order to foster the participation of all members, an online program (SPARKPLUS) will be used for self and peer assessment of individual contributions to team activities. SPARKPLUS allows students to rate their own contribution to team tasks and anonymously rate other team members. SPARKPLUS then produces two factors: 1. SAPA factor Gives feedback on how well the team thinks you are contributing compared to how well

    you think you are contributing SAPA factor > 1: You rated your own performance higher than your teammates did (overrated). SAPA factor < 1: You rated your own performance lower than your teammates did (underrated).

    2. SPA factor Your average contribution rating compared to the average of all team members contribution ratings. The subject coordinator reserves the right to use the SPA factor to adjust individual marks for team assignments in Parts A Detailed, B and C (ie. The SPA factor will be a multiplier above or below 1).

    Please note that both SAPA and SPA factors will be compulsorily used for feedback in Parts A Detailed, B and C. The feedback for Part A Conceptual will provide some opportunity to resolve any team issues before SPA factors are used to adjust individual marks in the remaining group reports. Groups that do not submit a SPARK rating will incur a penalty of 5% against every member of the groups. Please note that there is a time limit for submitting SPARK rating. You can only submit the rating one week before the report due date, until one week after the due date. No exemption will be given without a valid reason. Instructions on how to use SPARKPLUS can be found in the Moodle site. Supplementary Assessment Students who receive a mark of 48% or 49% will be considered for supplementary assessment. The offer of supplementary assessment is not automatic and will be considered on a case by case basis. The precise form of supplementary assessment will be determined at the time the offer of supplementary assessment is made. Students can log on to SOLS and click on the link titled Supplementary Assessment to view any applicable offers. Students must make themselves available during the supplementary exam period to take up any offer of supplementary assessment. The supplementary exam period for spring session 2014 is from 15 - 19 December. No consideration will be given to requests for re-scheduling supplementary exam times, in particular, consideration will not be granted on grounds such as usual or routine work or family commitments, or clashes with recreational activities or holiday arrangements.

  • 5

    Details of referencing system to be used in written work Please see http://www.library.uow.edu.au/resourcesbytopic/UOW026621.html Use of internet resources and restrictions placed on use of internet resources There are no restrictions on students accessing information from the internet, however, students must acknowledge all sources and should not copy information verbatim as this has no academic merit (i.e. no marks are awarded for this type of information) even when referenced correctly. Plagiarism Students are responsible for submitting original work for assessment, without plagiarising or cheating, abiding by the University's policy on plagiarism as set out in the University Handbook under Universities Policy Directory and in Faculty Handbooks and subject guides. Plagiarism has led to the expulsion from the University. Further information on plagiarism and acknowledgement practice can be found in the Faculty Policy document, with full details available online. Submission of Assignments and Penalties for Late Work All assignments should be submitted in hardcopy through the EIS Central. Late assignments will not be accepted without supporting documentation. Late submission will result in a deduction of 10% of the maximum mark per day. To submit an assignment through the EIS Central, you will need to generate a cover sheet on the web and attach this to your assignment. Hand in the assignment to EIS Central and the staff will barcode scan your assignment cover sheet. You will then receive a receipt by email. When your assignment has been marked, you will also be emailed that it is ready to be picked up from EIS Central. On collecting your assignment, EIS Central will barcode scan your student ID card. To generate the cover sheet, go to: http://130.130.8.11/fmi/iwp/res/iwp_auth.html Login: student Password: coverit If you are required to work as a group and are to submit a group assignment or report, nominate a team leader to take the responsibility of generating the cover sheet, handing in the assignment and collecting it back from EIS Central. Only the team leader will be able to collect the assignment. The team leader should select the option and ensure that the other team members names are entered in the appropriate field. All group and individual reports MUST have the Turnitin report attached. Without it, your submission will not be awarded marks. www.turnitin.com Class ID: 8249937 Password: CIVL444S214 Retention of Written Work Written assessment work will be retained by the EIS Central for two weeks after marking. Dr. Lip Teh A/Prof. Shuqing Yang Dr. Martin Liu July 2014

    School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering