1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com Developed a prototype medical device for electro- physical therapy combined and applied to a case . Painful shoulder PS is a common condition that involves the rehabilitation field for its significance in the functionality of the people . This study was conducted at the National Hospital Dos de Mayo , Lima Peru . PS was included traumatic and rheumatic with clinical or ultrasound of biceps tendinitis , rotator cuff tendonitis and supraspinatus tendinitis . The clinical trial was conducted from September 2010 to September 2012 . The target population consisted of 80 patients between 30 and 50 years who have applied before and after Scale Evolution of Global Function UCLA. We evaluated the ability to : activities of daily living (ADL), work at home, sports and performing your current job. This population was selected for 4 types of treatment for every 20 persons which included the use of electro - physical agents. In group A : Ultrasound + TENS, group B : Laser + TENS, group C : Ultrasound + Laser, group D : + LED magnetic fields . The results demonstrated in the subjective rating scale that 90 % of patients in group D was greatly improved by the end of treatment. According to the UCLA scale was reached less pain full and complete independence in ADL , and 85 % amplitude improved joint range and muscle strength. We conclude that tissue regenerator prototype based on physical factors combined is a viable option for physical therapy in developing countries and requires further study for application in other clinical cases . ABSTRACT METODOLOGY RESULTS The magneto infrared laser therapy (MILT) is a device in a single device even four physical agents - energy interacting synergistically: a constant magnetic field, pulsed visible red light, infrared light emission and non-coherent infrared laser light pulsed monochromatic coherent and focused. According to the parameters of the evaluation scale of the UCLA shoulder, we found the following results expressed in percentages in graph No. 1.. CONCLUSIONS The following graph (No. 2) shows the overall response regarding the evolution of the patient. When performing the test statistical significance was obtained by what is considered to be statistically significant results which could be verified by the chi- square test (p <0,05). REFERENCES The combined use of electro physical agents improves the quality of treatment of traumatic injuries of the upper limb. The therapeutic effects established in the literature have been verified in this study has allowed the elaboration one Clinical Practice Guide based on evidence. The results demonstrated in the subjective assessment scald that 90% of patients in group D was greatly improved by the end of treatment. Also UCLA scale showed complete pain reduction, and independence in ADL and 85% amplitude improved joint range and muscle strength. When comparing between the responses to conventional combination therapy and therapeutic exercises + therapeutic activities for painful shoulder, according to the evolution of patients, we can say that the experimental group showed better outcome It took into account the following indicators for the scheme traumatic treatment of upper limb injuries, show in the Table 1. 1 Pontifical Catholic University of Peru / Graduate School, Master of Biomedical Engineering, Lima, Peru 2 National Hospital Dos de Mayo / Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lima, Peru L. Vilcahuamán 1 , M. Arista 2 BASED TISSUE REGENERATION OF PHYSICAL FACTORS COMBINED : CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDY IN PAINFUL SHOULDER 171911, H33 VASCULAR LESIONS AND BURNS FRACTURES AND JOINT INJURIES TENDON AND PERIPHERAL INJURIES AND REIMPLANTATION MISCELLANEOU S Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Experimental Group Continuous ultrasound (vascular) + laser/Pulsed ultrasound (burns) + laser Laser + TENS Pulsed ultrasound (les. tendon and peripheral) + TENS or laser Magnetic Fields + Laser LED type Thermal and non- thermal modalities Nonthermal mode and electrical stimulation Thermal modality, electrical stimulation or nonthermal modality Nonthermal modality Table 1. Selection Chart Electrophysical agents vs. pathology (own source) *Injuries with less than 6 months, U.S. pulsed; more 6 months, U.S. continuous. ** Secondary hematopoietic organs: liver (Magnetic Fields) and spleen (Laser LED type) GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 EXPERIMENTAL GROUP Parameters US + TENS Laser + TENS US + Laser Magnetic Field + Laser LED type Frequency U.S.: 1MHz Continuous / pulse * Rectangular TENS symmetrical biphasic 100 Hz; 300uS; LASER: 800mW average power, continuous TENS: Rectangular symmetrical biphasic 100 Hz, 300uS; LASER: 800mW average power, continuous U.S.: 1MHz Continuous / pulse * 7-9 Hertz bio frequencies Intensity U.S.: 1.8 W/cm 2 TENS: sensory level LASER: 10.4 Joules/cm 2 TENS: sensory level LASER: 10.4 Joules/cm 2 US :1.8 W/cm 2 150 Gauss Treatment Time 12’ TENS:20’ LASER: 2-4’ US: 10’ LASER: 2-4’ Stimulation OH **: 15 ' Shoulder: 20 ' Type of therapy Combined Individual Individual Combined Table No. 2. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR APPLICATION OF AGENTS ELECTROPHYSICAL (own source) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Fuerza GRUPO B GRUPO C GRUPO D GRAPHIC NO. 1. EVOLUTION ACCORDING TO THE PARAMETERS OF THE SHOULDER RATING SCALE UCLA AND INDEPENDECE IN ADL, BY CONTROL AND EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS. Pain ROM Group 1 Group 3 Experimental Group Group 2 Muscle force Independence ADL 0 20 40 60 80 100 Chart Title GRAPH N º 2. GLOBAL RESPONSE IN FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT SCALE OF SHOULDER UCLA PERCENTAGES Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Experimental group Excellent Good Regular Bad This study is explanatory, experimental clinical trial in patients with painful shoulder traumatic and rheumatic origin and included a clinical and ultrasound diagnosis of the of PS. Eighty patients, there were 42 men and 38 women between 30 and 50 years, and less than 9 months of evolution of the pathology, which had a therapeutic program for 12 weeks . Were classified in 4 groups, each one 20, with 10, rheumatic origin and 10, traumatic origin, excluding those from the oncologic and/or neurological origin. In Table 2 shows the parameters used for the therapeutic approach. 1. Superficial physical agents and pain. Analysis of its effectiveness in the light of scientific evidence / Superficial physical Modalities and pain. Analysis of Their efficacy in light of the scientific evidence, FJ Ulloa Pa-time, Journal of the Spanish Society of Pain, Pain Rev. Soc. Esp v.16 n.3 Naron (A Coruna) in April. 2009. 2. Physical Agents in Rehabilitation, from research to practice, Michelle Cameron, p. 346-364. Elsevier, 2009 3. Magnetolaserultrasonidoterapia, Samosjuk, N. Chukraev, N. Inyutin., practical scientific materials, Moscow, 2002. 4. Evidence-Based Electrotherapy, T. Watson,, 12th edition, Elsevier, 2009.

clinical effectiveness study in painful shoulder 171911, h33 vascular

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: clinical effectiveness study in painful shoulder 171911, h33 vascular

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—)

DES IG N G U IDE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 70cmx100cm presentation

poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable

time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics.

We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the

poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To

view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com

and click on HELP DESK.

When you are ready to print your poster, go online to

PosterPresentations.com

Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is

more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the

affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The

template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You

can manually override this feature and change the size of your text.

TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution

name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by

dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT

> PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed.

Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make

any necessary adjustments.

TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste,

or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down

the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking

poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will

print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED Corner handles

Go

od

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

Bad

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN

menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also

create your own color theme.

You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW >

SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW >

NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted

placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add

more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or

by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present.

The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference

requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and

click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and

columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document.

A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE,

TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some

reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been

created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column

options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on

the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save

as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to

VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in

PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide

Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of

“Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to

PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the

poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a

PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to

printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through

Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day,

and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more

information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page.

Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

© 2013 PosterPresentations.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710

[email protected]

Developed a prototype medical device for electro- physical therapy combined and

applied to a case . Painful shoulder PS is a common condition that involves the

rehabilitation field for its significance in the functionality of the people . This study was

conducted at the National Hospital Dos de Mayo , Lima Peru . PS was included

traumatic and rheumatic with clinical or ultrasound of biceps tendinitis , rotator cuff

tendonitis and supraspinatus tendinitis .

The clinical trial was conducted from September 2010 to September 2012 . The

target population consisted of 80 patients between 30 and 50 years who have

applied before and after Scale Evolution of Global Function UCLA. We evaluated the

ability to : activities of daily living (ADL), work at home, sports and performing your

current job. This population was selected for 4 types of treatment for every 20

persons which included the use of electro - physical agents. In group A : Ultrasound +

TENS, group B : Laser + TENS, group C : Ultrasound + Laser, group D : + LED

magnetic fields .

The results demonstrated in the subjective rating scale that 90 % of patients in group

D was greatly improved by the end of treatment. According to the UCLA scale was

reached less pain full and complete independence in ADL , and 85 % amplitude

improved joint range and muscle strength.

We conclude that tissue regenerator prototype based on physical factors combined is

a viable option for physical therapy in developing countries and requires further study

for application in other clinical cases .

ABSTRACT

METODOLOGY

RESULTS

The magneto infrared laser therapy (MILT) is a device in a single device even four

physical agents - energy interacting synergistically: a constant magnetic field, pulsed

visible red light, infrared light emission and non-coherent infrared laser light pulsed

monochromatic coherent and focused. According to the parameters of the evaluation

scale of the UCLA shoulder, we found the following results expressed in percentages

in graph No. 1..

CONCLUSIONS

The following graph (No. 2) shows the overall response regarding the evolution of the

patient. When performing the test statistical significance was obtained by what is

considered to be statistically significant results which could be verified by the chi-

square test (p <0,05).

REFERENCES

The combined use of electro physical agents improves the quality of treatment of

traumatic injuries of the upper limb. The therapeutic effects established in the

literature have been verified in this study has allowed the elaboration one Clinical

Practice Guide based on evidence.

The results demonstrated in the subjective assessment scald that 90% of patients in

group D was greatly improved by the end of treatment. Also UCLA scale showed

complete pain reduction, and independence in ADL and 85% amplitude improved

joint range and muscle strength.

When comparing between the responses to conventional combination therapy and

therapeutic exercises + therapeutic activities for painful shoulder, according to the

evolution of patients, we can say that the experimental group showed better

outcome

It took into account the following indicators for the scheme traumatic treatment of

upper limb injuries, show in the Table 1.

1Pontifical Catholic University of Peru / Graduate School, Master of Biomedical Engineering, Lima, Peru 2National Hospital Dos de Mayo / Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lima, Peru

L. Vilcahuamán 1, M. Arista2

BASED TISSUE REGENERATION OF PHYSICAL FACTORS COMBINED :

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDY IN PAINFUL SHOULDER

171911, H33

VASCULAR LESIONS

AND BURNS

FRACTURES

AND JOINT

INJURIES

TENDON AND

PERIPHERAL INJURIES

AND REIMPLANTATION

MISCELLANEOU

S

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Experimental

Group

Continuous ultrasound

(vascular) + laser/Pulsed

ultrasound (burns) +

laser

Laser + TENS Pulsed ultrasound (les.

tendon and peripheral) +

TENS or laser

Magnetic Fields +

Laser LED type

Thermal and non-

thermal modalities

Nonthermal mode

and electrical

stimulation

Thermal modality,

electrical stimulation or

nonthermal modality

Nonthermal

modality

Table 1. Selection Chart Electrophysical agents vs. pathology (own source)

*Injuries with less than 6 months, U.S. pulsed; more 6 months, U.S. continuous.

** Secondary hematopoietic organs: liver (Magnetic Fields) and spleen (Laser LED type)

GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 EXPERIMENTAL

GROUP

Parameters US + TENS Laser + TENS US + Laser Magnetic Field +

Laser LED type

Frequency

U.S.: 1MHz

Continuous / pulse *

Rectangular TENS

symmetrical biphasic

100 Hz; 300uS;

LASER: 800mW

average power,

continuous

TENS:

Rectangular

symmetrical

biphasic 100 Hz,

300uS;

LASER: 800mW

average power,

continuous

U.S.: 1MHz

Continuous /

pulse *

7-9 Hertz bio

frequencies

Intensity U.S.: 1.8 W/cm2

TENS: sensory level

LASER: 10.4

Joules/cm2

TENS: sensory

level

LASER: 10.4

Joules/cm2

US :1.8 W/cm2

150 Gauss

Treatment

Time

12’ TENS:20’

LASER: 2-4’

US: 10’

LASER: 2-4’

Stimulation OH

**: 15 '

Shoulder: 20 '

Type of

therapy

Combined Individual Individual Combined

Table No. 2. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR APPLICATION OF AGENTS ELECTROPHYSICAL (own source)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DolorMovimiento

articular Fuerzamuscular Independencia

AVD

Chart Title

GRUPO A GRUPO B GRUPO C GRUPO D

GRAPHIC NO. 1. EVOLUTION ACCORDING TO THE PARAMETERS OF THE SHOULDER RATING SCALE UCLA AND INDEPENDECE IN ADL, BY CONTROL AND EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS.

Pain ROM

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Experimental Group Group 2

Muscle

force Independence

ADL

0

20

40

60

80

100

GRUPO AGRUPO B

GRUPO CGRUPO D

Axi

s Ti

tle

Axis Title

Chart Title

Excelente

Bueno

Regular

Malo

GRAPH N º 2. GLOBAL RESPONSE IN FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT SCALE OF SHOULDER UCLA

PER

CEN

TAG

ES

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Experimental group

Excellent

Good

Regular

Bad

This study is explanatory, experimental clinical trial in patients with painful shoulder

traumatic and rheumatic origin and included a clinical and ultrasound diagnosis of the

of PS. Eighty patients, there were 42 men and 38 women between 30 and 50 years,

and less than 9 months of evolution of the pathology, which had a therapeutic

program for 12 weeks . Were classified in 4 groups, each one 20, with 10, rheumatic

origin and 10, traumatic origin, excluding those from the oncologic and/or

neurological origin. In Table 2 shows the parameters used for the therapeutic

approach.

1. Superficial physical agents and pain. Analysis of its effectiveness in the light of

scientific evidence / Superficial physical Modalities and pain. Analysis of Their

efficacy in light of the scientific evidence, FJ Ulloa Pa-time, Journal of the Spanish

Society of Pain, Pain Rev. Soc. Esp v.16 n.3 Naron (A Coruna) in April. 2009.

2. Physical Agents in Rehabilitation, from research to practice, Michelle Cameron,

p. 346-364. Elsevier, 2009

3. Magnetolaserultrasonidoterapia, Samosjuk, N. Chukraev, N. Inyutin., practical

scientific materials, Moscow, 2002.

4. Evidence-Based Electrotherapy, T. Watson,, 12th edition, Elsevier, 2009.