Upload
charleigh-edwards
View
23
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COG/TNG contribution to LPR Implementation. Language Proficiency: a safety issue St. Petersburg May 24th 2011. ICAO EUR/NAT EANPG – European Air Navigation Planning Group COG – Programme Coordinating Group COG TNG TASK FORCE – Coordinating Group Training Task Force. EANPG - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
COG/TNG contribution
to LPR Implementation
Language Proficiency: a safety issue
St. Petersburg May 24th 2011
ICAO EUR/NAT
EANPG – European Air Navigation Planning Group
COG – Programme Coordinating Group
COG TNG TASK FORCE – Coordinating Group Training Task Force
EANPGEuropean Air Navigation Planning Group
1972 – ESTABLISHED BY ICAO COUNCIL
Among the terms of reference:
-Identify possibile safety threats and consequently develop a safety analysis that would result in the allocation of priorities to address definciecies
- ensure the development and implementation of an action plan by States to resolve identified deficiencies
EANPG COG
Programme Coordinating Group
ESTABLISHED BY EANPG IN 1995
To facilitate and coordinate the work of the EANPG between its meetings,
Avoid duplication of work
Maintain a dialogue with other Regions
EANPG COG
Programme Coordinating Group
to facilitate the ongoing work undertaken within the EANPG framework
to assist the Chairman and the Secretariat
to expedite follow up work of the EANPG
Preview draft Conclusions and Decisions emerging from the work of EANPG working groups and other input for the attention of EANPG
prepare and refine EANPG material to assist and guide the ICAO Secretariat in its work in support of EANPG
carry out specific task given by the EANPG
EANPG COG MANDATE:
EXECUTE ITS FUNCTION AS A COORDINATING AND STEERING ORGAN
DIRECT THE WORK PROGRAMMES AND TASKS OF CONTRIBUTORY BODIES
ENSURE THAT CONTIBUTORY BODIES HAVE CLEAR DEFINED TASKS
REVIEW THE REPORTS MADE BY CONTRIBUTORY BODIES
DETERMINE THE SUBJECT MATURED FOR THE SUBMISSION TO EANPG FOR CONCLUSIONS
COG TRAINING TASK FORCE
EANPG contributory bodies:
Assist COG in processing EANPG Task List by working on defined subjects requiring detailed technical expertise
It has be given terms of reference, a list of task
1994 : GATE working group for Air Traffic Management in the Eastern Part of the ICAO European Region.
Project Team on Training:
compile and complete data provided by States and build up a picture of States requirements in training, in particular in English language
establish a comprehensive picture of available training facilities
suggest the actions to be taken to meet the above requirements
report to COG
2005 - ACTION PLAN BY COG TNG
EANPG through its Programme Coordinating Group (COG) gave a task to the COG Air Traffic Management (ATM) Training Task Force:
to develop a plan of action to assist States to meet the ICAO language proficiency requirements by 2008. This Action Plan was developed and was reviewed by COG (Lisbon, Portugal, 1 – 3 June 2005).
2005
The Action Plan was divided into two phases:
Phase 1 covered the period up to 5 March 2008 and dealt with actions required to reach Level 4 proficiency, and
Phase 2 after 5 march 2008 proposed actions for the maintenance of Level 4 proficiency or higher.
2005
EANPG:
adopted the recommended ICAO EUR/NAT Action Plan for the LPRI
agreed that ICAO regularly up-date the Action Plan to assist States
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
Language proficiency requirements
Included in strategic objectives:
A SAFETY enhance global civil aviation safety
Key activity: 2 “ Ensure the timely implementation of ICAO provisions by continuously monitoring the progress toward compliance by States.
C ENVIROMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY EFFICIENCY enhance the efficiency of aviation operations
2005
COG mandated COG Training Task Force:
to up-date the Action Plan
to provide assistance to States in implementing
LPR
In coordination with ICAO EUR/NAT to develop a programme for specialized seminar/workshops
2006
COG Training Task Force contribution:
PARIS workshopSept. 2006
outcomes
States be invited to implement measures that require or encourage ATCOs and pilots to use english language only at least in busy sectors and international airports
Recommended requirements for raters/interlocutors
update action plan
2007
COG Training Task Force contribution:
LANGEN workshopSept. 2007
OBJECTIVE: address the matter of the status of implementation
2007
COG Training Task Force contribution:
LANGEN workshopSept. 2007 outcomes
importance of taking all appropriate actions by States, Airlines, Service providers, organisations concerned to achieve the timely implementation
Need to harmonize language testing criteria on a global level
requirements to identify priorities items to be addressed by State
Encourage the transition to a single language enviroment
2007
COG Training Task Force contribution:
MINSK workshopDec. 2007 objectives
assist States that were experiencing difficulties in complying with LPR and would need to post their implementation plan prior to the applicability date.
To forster regional cooperation
2007
COG Training Task Force contribution:
MINSK workshopDec. 2007 outcomes
States representatives were instructed on how fill and post the implementation plan to ICAO
Great number of them posted the information within a short period after the workshop
2008
COG Training Task Force contribution:
Update action plan
Continue to provide assistance to States who were not able to timely implement LPR
ALMATY WKS
Addressed to States of the eastern part of EUR NAT region
2008
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ALMATY WKS outcomes
ICAO continue to provide assistance to State not able to timely implement LPR
To monitor the implementation of the action plan
Need to plan a special seminar for examiners, raters and trainers
2009
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ULYANOVSK WKS objectives
ICAO continue to provide assistance to State not able to timely implement LPR in taking further steps during tha tansition period
Cover various aspects of the implementation, in particular requirements for raters and examiners (through guidelines)
applied tests and rating techniques to ensure uniform and harmonised approach to implementation
2009
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ULYANOVSK WKS outcomes
there was a wide diversity of test design and format among the test presented
not all States apply the generale recommendation contained in ICAO Doc 9835
the certification process for raters and examiners was not established properly in a number of States
need of more support in the area of aviation training
need of recurrent training in States no mother tongue
2010
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ROME WKSMarch 2010
outcomes
Opportunity to States to exchange information and experience on LPRI related to training issue
need for ICAO to continue to provide assistance to States
Need for LP test endorsement mechanism under ICAO “umbrella”
2010
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ROME WKS outcomes
Need of clear and complete regulation on:
regulatory oversight of training and testing institutions
adequate training standards - documentation and implementation
language maintenance policy/requirements, including non-regular international operators
mutual recognition of LPR ratings – regulatory aspect
2010
COG Training Task Force contribution:
ROME WKS outcomes
Need of clear and complete regulation on:
regulation/requirements for recurrent training of not only aviation personnel but ALSO examiners
Interaction between Level 6 and Level 4
2010
COG Training Task Force contribution:
PARIS WKSDec 2010
outcomes
need to proceede in regulating on and implementing:
maintain standards and sustain process
endorsement test procedures
LPR for other categories of aviation personnel
“one language – one enviroment”
2005/2010
COG Training Task Force contribution:
Updating action plan
Assisting States and
stakeholders
Cooperating and contributing in organising
workshops and seminars
2005/2010
COG Training Task Force contribution: