19
Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory

Bogdan StrimbuLouisiana Tech University

Page 2: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Issue

• Inventory of the forest resources

• Practical applications: preset intensity

• Alternative: sampling design

• Legal constraints

2

Page 3: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Objective

• Questions to answer:

1. Is preset-intensity inventory legally defendable?

2. Are there significant differences between preset-

intensity inventories and sampling based

inventories?

3

Page 4: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Approach

• USFS and Florida Assessor guidelines

• Sampling error standards dependent on the

estimated value of the sale

• alpha=5%

4

Page 5: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sampling error standardsUSFS Alpha=5%

Value SE

<15000 20%

<35000 19%

<55000 16%

<75000 14%

<95000 12%

>95000 10%

Florida merchantable planted pine alpha=5% SE=10%

merchantable natural timber alpha=10% SE=10%

pre-merchantable pine alpha=32% SE=10%

5

Page 6: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Settings• Preset - intensity inventories: 5% and 10%

• Alpha=5%→Approximate t=2

• Plot size: 0.1. ac

• Simple Random Sampling without replacement

• Homogeneous stand → No stratification

• The population has a mean

6

Page 7: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Formulae

222

1

1

1

1

1

1

:

:

tCVAE

NtCVAE

NN

N

ni

tCVAE

N

n

SRSdesignSampling

N

niNi

plotArea

Areain

Intensity

7

Page 8: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. CV• Area=10 ac

8

Page 9: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. CV• Area=20 ac

9

Page 10: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. CV• Area=50 ac

10

Page 11: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. CV• Area=100 ac

11

Page 12: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. Sample error• Area= 10 ac

12

Page 13: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. Sample error• Area= 20 ac

13

Page 14: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. Sample error• Area= 50 ac

14

Page 15: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Sample size vs. Sample error• Area= 100 ac

15

Page 16: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Intensity – CV for a=10%

16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500%

1%

2%

3%

4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

20 ac @SE=10% 20 ac @SE=20% 50 ac @SE=10% 50 ac @SE=20%

100 ac @SE=10% 100 ac @SE=20% 200 ac @SE=10% 200 ac @SE=20%

10 ac @SE=10% 10 ac @SE=20%CV [%]

Inte

nsit

y fo

r sta

nd a

rea>

20 a

c

Inte

nsit

y fo

r sta

nd a

rea

= 10

ac

Page 17: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Intensity – CV for a=5%

17

0 10 20 30 40 50 600%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

20 ac @SE=10% 20 ac @SE=20% 50 ac @SE=10% 50 ac @SE=20%100 ac @SE=10% 100 ac @SE=20% 200 ac @SE=10% 200 ac @SE=20%10 ac @SE=10% 10 ac @SE=20%

CV [%]

Inte

nsit

y fo

r sta

nd a

rea>

20 a

c

Inte

nsit

y fo

r sta

nd a

rea=

10

ac

Page 18: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Summary• USFS guidelines more strict then state guidelines• Intensity based inventory – legally defendable

using USFS or state guidelines (Florida) most of the cases

• Stratification recommended for high variable stands

• Intensity based inventory for stands>20 ac at least double the cruising effort

• For stands larger than 50 ac the cruising effort is almost comparing with the sampling based inventory 18

Page 19: Comparison between intensity based inventory and sampling based inventory Bogdan Strimbu Louisiana Tech University

Cauchy distribution

19

2

0

0

1

1),;(

xx

xxfPDF