Upload
trankhuong
View
221
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Composite Score Tutorial
David L. Johnson, NHA RAC-CT
IPRO
Senior Quality Improvement Specialist
Goals for this presentation…
• To provide a general overview of the Composite
Score
• To provide a recommended step-by-step process to
collect and analyze your own facility’s score.
• To establish the Composite Score as an identified
source of data and information for use in your QAPI
process to effectively collect, analyze, compare and
display your data to identify improvement
opportunities and assess your performance.
2
Element 3 in the 5 Elements in QAPI…
• Feedback, Data Systems and Monitoring
“The facility puts in place systems to monitor care and
services, drawing data from multiple sources.”
Once information has been gathered, you need to organize it in a
way that helps your team understand what is happening.
The effective use of data will ensure that decisions are being
made based on “fact” and not on an assumption of the truth.
QAPI Teams and Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Teams
need data to ensure they are targeting the right areas.
3
Resources for this presentation…
• CASPER Reporting MDS Provider User’s Guide
(Certification And Survey Provider Enhanced Reports)
• The CMS QAPI Guide: What You Need to Know / A
Companion to QAPI at a Glance
• MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User’s Manual
www.nursinghomes.ipro.org
4
This material was prepared by the Atlantic Quality Innovation Network/IPRO, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network
Quality Improvement Organization for New York State, South Carolina, and the District of Columbia, under contract with the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The
contents do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. 11SOW-AQINNY-TskC.2-15-15
Some Basic Composite Score Facts…
• The data used to calculate your facility’s Composite
Score comes directly from MDS records that are
submitted from your facility.
• The Composite Score is comprised of 13 NQF-
endorsed long-stay quality measures.
• Though not all 13 measures used to calculate your
Composite Score are currently available in the
CASPER system, 11 of those measures are available
from CASPER to review, analyze and monitor in “real
time”.
5
Where did the Composite Score come from?
The NNHQCC (National Nursing Home Quality Care
Collaborative), led by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) and Quality Improvement Organizations
(QIOs), ran from February 2013 through July 2014. There
were approximately 5,000 nursing homes participating
across the country.
The NNHQCC worked to instill quality and performance
improvement practices, eliminate healthcare acquired
conditions, and dramatically improve resident satisfaction
through the achievement of a rate of 6 or less using the
NNHQCC quality composite measure.
6
Where did the Composite Score come from? (continued…)
As with the Quality Measures –
“the lower the score, the better”.
7
(Total Numerators from 13 NQF- Endorsed QMs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------- = x 100 = Composite Score
(Total Denominators from 13 NQF- Endorsed QMs)
What is included in the Composite Score…
8
• The Composite Score is comprised of thirteen NQF-
endorsed long-stay quality measures
• Of those 13 long-stay quality measures
• 11 “Clinical” Quality Measures
• 2 Vaccine Quality Measures (Flu and Pneumococcal)*
*The two vaccination measures are “directionally opposite” and should
be reversed in the calculation. This is done by subtracting the
numerator from the denominator to obtain a “new” numerator. By
keeping the measure directions consistent, the composite score can be
interpreted as “the lower, the better”.
Which long-stay “clinical” measures are included in the Composite Score…
• Residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
• High-risk residents with a pressure ulcer
• Residents who are physically restrained
• Residents who fall with major injury
• Residents receiving an antipsychotic medication
• Residents with depressive symptoms
• Residents with a UTI
• Residents with a catheter inserted or left in bladder
• Low-risk residents with loss of the bowel or bladder
• Residents who lose too much weight
• Residents who need increased help with ADLs
9
Composite Score and CASPER Data…
• CASPER data includes 11 of the 13 QMs included in
the Composite Score calculation
• The 2 vaccination measures, though reported on NHC,
are currently not part of the reports available in the
CASPER system.
Our recommendation is that you monitor, analyze and
track the 11 “clinical” quality measures that are available
in the CASPER data system.
10
Facility Level Quality Measure Report…
11
Example of “Clinical Composite Score” (11 QMs)…
12
(Total Numerators from 11 QMs) 158
--------------------------------------------------------------- = .1296 x 100 = 12.96 (Total Denominators from 11 QMs) 1219
The Composite Score is calculated using a methodology based on the opportunity model.
The Denominator represents the # of opportunities to provide or reflect quality care.
The Numerator represents the number of times an opportunity was missed.
Vaccination Impact on Composite Score…
Because the 2 vaccination measures are “directionally
opposite” from the other quality measures…
• When the vaccination statistics are “reversed” and
included in the overall calculation for the Composite
Score-
• The result, in most cases... is a “softening”, or lowering, of
the composite score.
• This variation may vary from facility to facility.
• Upon request, the IPRO Nursing Home Team can provide
you with some historical data on the impact of your specific
facility’s vaccination “reversal”.
13
Example of “Vaccination” impact…
14
(Total Num. from 11 QMs) 158 + 10 = 168
--------------------------------------------------------------- = .1137 x 100 = 11.37 (Total Den. from 11 QMs) 1219 + 258 = 1477
For this example-
129 long-stay residents for EACH vaccination measure
Assume 5 out of 129 did not trigger for either vaccinations QM (96% Vaccination QMs)
“Clinical” Composite – 12.96
“Clinical” Composite plus Vaccination impact - 11.37
Difference - positive “softening” of 1.59 percentage points
“Clinical” Composite Calculator…
15
“Clinical” Composite Calculator…
16
“Clinical” Composite Calculator…
17
“Clinical” Composite Calculator…
18
Expand your knowledge and analysis…
• Consider both “sides” of each equation
• Numerator- Those residents “triggering”, or having the
condition.
• Denominator- All residents who could have had the
condition.
Any change in either part of the equation will change the result.
The analysis of your data must involve
BOTH the “inclusions” and the “exclusions” (if any)
for each Quality Measure.
19
“Clinical” Composite Calculator…
20
Quality Measure Specifications…
21
Full
description
of specific
Quality
Measure
Quality Measure Specifications…
22
Measure
Specifications
to include
“Numerator”,
“Denominator”,
and any
“Exclusions”
applicable to the
calculation of
the specific
Quality Measure
Quality Measure Specifications…
23
Any “Covariates”
applicable to the
calculation of the
specific Quality
Measure.
There is only a subset
of 3 quality measures
that are
“risk adjusted”…
Long Stay Pain,
Long Stay Catheter in
Bladder, & Short Stay
Pressure Ulcers.
Quality Measure Specifications…
Offer “item specific” information directly tied to the items on
the MDS 3.0…..
when paired with the most current version of the
RAI Manual…
that “drill down” process provides direction in the specific
coding requirements, guidance and expectations tied to
each detailed MDS item
impacting the specific quality measure.
24
Action Steps…
Ensure that key team members are fully educated in the
sources, adjustments and calculations of your CASPER data
and how they impact your facility’s Composite Score.
Develop a data collection plan, including who will collect
the data, who will review it, the frequency of the collection
and reporting, etc.
Determine focused areas of investigation based on your “real
time” data review, analysis and continuous monitoring of both
your CASPER data and the resulting Composite Score.
Charter appropriate teams to investigate, analyze,
recommend, trial and evaluate results for specific areas
identified through your consistent monitoring.
25
For more information
Pauline Kinney, RN, MA, LNHA, RAC-CT
Director, Healthcare Quality Improvement
Tel: (516) 209-5402
Maureen Valvo, RN, BSN, RAC-CT Sr. Quality Improvement Specialist
Tel: (516) 209-5308
IPRO CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
1979 Marcus Avenue
Lake Success, NY 11042-1002
IPRO REGIONAL OFFICE
20 Corporate Woods Boulevard
Albany, NY 12211-2370
www.atlanticquality.org
David L. Johnson, NHA, RAC-CT
Sr. Quality Improvement Specialist
Tel: (518) 320-3516
Dan Yuricic, MA
Sr. Quality Improvement Specialist
Tel: (516) 209-5458
Template 8/12/2014
IPRO Nursing Home Team
Pauline Dave Dan Maureen
Kinney Johnson Yuricic Valvo