Upload
doandat
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Hispano-Arab Horse breeders’ Association aims
to improve the genetics of both body conformation
targeted to riding and sport activities, as
temperamental qualities (attitudes and behaviors) in
order to facilitate dressage management, and to be
distinguished in the required disciplines.
The objective of the present paper was to study
diverse methodologies for the genetic parameters
estimation of conformational and movements traits
in Spanish-Arab horses with a view to determine
which mathematical philosophy give the best
performance in traits based of objective
assessments. Harmony, walk, trot and gallop
assessments were the traits observed as selection
criteria.
Introduction
M. Gómez1*, S. A. Attalla3, J. Fernández2, J.M. León1, N. Carolino4, L.T. Gama5, J. V. Delgado1
Preliminary comparative analysis of the application of infinitesimal and threshold models in the estimation of genetic parameters of
harmony and movements traits in Spanish-Arabian horses
Materials and Methods
A single trait animal model with repeated
observations, taking into account as fixed effects the
management groups (36 farm clusters according to
their zootechnical management), sex, year, season
and qualifier. Random effects were the individual
genetic additive value and the permanent
environmental effects.
This model was resolved using both an infinitesimal
model using the Restricted Maximum Likelihood
theory and the derivate free algorithm; and a
threshold model using the Gibbs sampling method.
1. For the threshold model , THRGIBBS1F90
Software, was used considering 750000 cycles, being
50000 of them discarded (burn-in), afterwards one of
every 1000 samples were stored to calculate the
posterior distributions, remaining 700 samples taken
into account in the study.
2. For the REML model WOMBAT Software was used,
with a convergence criterion of 10-9. Once the
solutions from both methodologies obtained, genetic
parameters and their errors were compared.
Conclusion
In conclusion we have determined that both
methodologies shown similar estimations. It is
pointing out that the use of threshold models do not
improve the efficiency of the methods presently used
in the breeding program of the breed base on REML
estimations. All traits taken into account are
continuous and distributed according to normal
characteristics.
Results
Heritabilities obtained by mean of the Threshold
models and their correspondent errors of estimation
were;
1Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria. Universidad de Córdoba. España. E-mail: 2 Union Española de Ganaderos de Pura Raza Hispano-Árabe. Sevilla, España.
3 Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt. 4 Unidade de Recursos Genéticos, Reprodução e Melhoramento Animal. INRB, IP. Santarém. Portugal.
5 Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Portugal.
Data set
1704 registers
Recorded along 11 years (2000-2011)
Kinship matrix was integrated by 1184
Belonging to 559 both sexes individuals
36 farms
Heritabilities obtained using the REML model were;
Traits h2 (SE) r (SE)
Harmony 0.28 (0.05) 0.33 (0.06)
Walk 0.02 (0.004) 0.17 (0.03)
Trot 0.20 (0.05) 0.35 (0.02)
Gallop 0.12 (0.03) 0.20 (0.01)
Traits h2 (SE) r (SE)
Harmony 0.22 (0.07) 0.32 (0.03)
Walk 0.13 (0.05) 0.20 (0.03)
Trot 0.16 (0.06) 0.30 (0.03)
Gallop 0.11 (0.05) 0.18 (0.03)
0,000
0,050
0,100
0,150
0,200
0,250
0,300
Harmony Walk Trot Gallop
threshold
linear
Figure 1. Difference between heritabilities estimated using linear
and threshold models.