Upload
laura-gogia
View
55
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A framework for understanding, defining, comparing and contrasting higher education course designs that carry a "connected learning" designation
Citation preview
7/17/2019 Connected Learning Criteria
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/connected-learning-criteria 1/1
Connected
Course
Online
Presence Openness Digital Expression Participation Student Agency
Minimum
Criteria
Web-
Enhanced
Course syllabus &
documents housed
on public website
Students blog publiclyStudents comment on each
other’s blog posts
Students retain access to course
materials and learning products
(individual & group) after the
course
Hybrid &
Blended
Required materials
(e.g. readings, digital
tools) are open
access/sourced.
Students are asked to use
multimodal expression in
their blog posts
Students work together to curate
the web (crowdsourcing)
Students contribute to the
course learning materials
Students are asked to
generate their own
multimodal creations intheir blog posts
Students engage in synchronous
or partially synchronous class
discussion (e.g. Twitter,Facebook, Discourse)
Students are able to adapt
learning activities & products to
their personal learning goals
More Fully Online
Open participant
course enrollment is
encouraged
Students are asked to
create and demonstrate
digital workflows across
digital platforms
Students engage in collaborative
projects
Students participate
meaningfully in their own
assessment
The Connected Learning Course Design
In higher education, connected learning course designs cannot be uniformly conceived, because they must be flexible enough to suit a variety of disciplines,
student levels, learning objectives, and course formats. However, a loosely framed concept of connected learning has emerged that allows for definition,
comparing, and contrasting of different courses along five qualitative axes. The first row represents the minimum criteria required to be called a “Connected
Learning” course. However, beyond the first row the columns can operate independently from each other. The range of “minimum criteria” to “more” connecte
is not meant to relay a value judgment on the overall quality of the course design; the instructor, resources, students, purpose, and discipline all play roles in
choosing the desired level of “connectedness.” Some fit better with higher levels of connectedness than others.