Contact Stiffness Chapter Three. Training Manual October 15, 2001 Inventory # 001567 3-2 Contact Stiffness A. Basic Concepts Review: Recall that all ANSYS

Contact Stiffness

Chapter Three

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-2

Advanced Contact & Bolt Pretension 6.0


Training Manual

Contact StiffnessA. Basic Concepts

Review:• Recall that all ANSYS contact elements use a penalty stiffness

(contact stiffness) to help enforce compatibility at the contact interface.

• Some finite amount of penetration, , is required mathematically to maintain equilibrium.

• However, physical contacting bodies do not interpenetrate ( = 0).

The contact spring will deflect an amount , such that equilibrium is satisfied:

F = k where k is the contact stiffness.

F

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-3



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Basic Concepts

• As an analyst, you face a dilemma:– Minimum penetration gives best accuracy.

• Therefore, the contact stiffness should be very great.– However, too stiff a value causes convergence difficulties.

• The model can oscillate, with contacting surfaces bouncing off of each other.

Iteration n Iteration n+1

F

F

FcontactF

Iteration n+2

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-4



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness ... Basic Concepts

• The contact stiffness is the most important parameter affecting both accuracy and convergence behavior.

• You must carefully determine an appropriate value for contact stiffness.– Balance the convergence efficiency against the required level of

accuracy.– The “best” value is problem dependent, and must often be

determined by trial-and-error.• Estimate a trial value to use, then examine the convergence

behavior and accuracy.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-5



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Basic Concepts

• In addition to transmitting normal action (pressure) between surfaces, contact elements also transmit tangential action (friction).

• The contact elements use a tangential penalty stiffness to enforce compatibility in the tangential direction.

• The tangential penalty stiffness affects convergence and accuracy in exactly the same way as the normal penalty stiffness.

Ftangent

Ftangent = ktangent

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-6



Training Manual

Contact StiffnessB. Specifying a value

• Determining a good penalty stiffness value may require some experimentation.

• For surface-to-surface elements, the penalty stiffness is conveniently specified as a factor to be applied as a function of the underlying element stiffness.– As a starting estimate, try:

• FKN = 1.0 for bulky solids in contact.• FKN = 0.01 – 0.1 for more flexible (bending-dominated) parts.

– Alternatively, you can specify an absolute stiffness value, in units of (Force/Length)/Area.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-7



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Specifying a value

• The node-to-node (except CONTA178) and node-to-surface contact elements require the input of an absolute value for the penalty stiffness KN.– As a starting estimate use the following:

• For bulk deformations: 0.1*E < KN < 1.0*E• For bending: 0.01*E < KN < 0.1*E• …where E is the modulus of elasticity.

– Refer to the Appendix for a more detailed discussion on how to calculate an appropriate absolute stiffness value.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-8



Training Manual


• The following procedure may be used as a guideline:1. Use a low stiffness value to start.2. Run the analysis to a fraction of the final load.3. Check the penetration and number of equilibrium iterations

used in each substep. • As a rough, quick check, if you can visually detect

penetration in a true-scale displaced plot of the entire model, the penetration is probably excessive. Increase the stiffness and restart.

• If many iterations are needed for convergence (or if convergence is never achieved), reduce the stiffness and restart.

– Note: Penalty stiffness can be modified from one load step to another, and can be adjusted in a restart.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-9



Training Manual


• Remember: The contact stiffness is the most important parameter affecting both accuracy and convergence behavior.– If you can fully grasp this idea, you will be able to master most

contact difficulties!

• If you are having convergence problems, reduce the stiffness value, and rerun.

• You should also verify the validity of your results by varying the penalty stiffness value in a sensitivity study. – Tighten the stiffness in successive analyses, until important

results items (contact pressure, max. SEQV, etc.) cease to change significantly.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-10



Training Manual

Contact StiffnessWorkshop

• Please refer to your Workshop Supplement for instructions on:

• W1. Contact Stiffness.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-11



Training Manual

Contact StiffnessC. Appendix – Calculating a value

Contact StiffnessAppendix

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-12



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness… Appendix – Calculating a value

• Frequently, you can estimate a good value for the contact stiffness as a function of the relative stiffness of the areas in contact.

• The stiffness of a bulky solid will generally be greater than that of a springy, bending-dominated structure. The contact stiffness will typically be correspondingly greater for bulky solid structures.– Examples of bulky contact include metal forging, wheel-on-rail,

pin in a bearing block, etc.

– Examples of bending-dominated contact include leaf springs, sheet metal forming, etc.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-13



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Appendix – Calculating a value• For bulky solids, the Hertz contact stiffness often provides an

appropriate basis for the penalty stiffness. This stiffness can be estimated from the element size and Young’s modulus.

• For a uniformly-shaped 3D element, the Hertz stiffness would be approximately kHertz a x E, where a is the characteristic element size, and E is the Young’s modulus.

• For 2D elements with thickness (t), Hertz stiffness would be approximately kHertz t x E.

– For 2D axisymmetric elements, the “thickness” is 1 radian x r, giving a Hertz stiffness of approximately kHertz r x E.

a

a

a

a

at

ra

a

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-14



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Appendix – Calculating a value

• As a practical matter, a good first trial value for bulky contact stiffness would be kcontact = fbulk x kHertz, where fbulk is a factor usually between 0.1 and 10 for bulky solids.– Because the starting estimated value of fbulk ranges over at least

two orders of magnitude, and because kcontact will be adjusted by trial-and-error anyway, it is usually not justifiable to worry about the element’s size when estimating the penalty stiffness.

• For bulky solids, simply estimate the penalty stiffness byk = fbulk x E

– where the factor fbulk is usually between 0.1 and 10, and a good starting value for fbulk is often fbulk = 1.0.

– This estimate assumes an approximate “unit” element size; for very large or very small elements, you might need to adjust the starting value of fbulk accordingly.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-15



Training Manual


• If your contact involves two different materials, use E of the softer contacting material.

• Account for the reduced tangent modulus if plasticity will be active.

• For Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic materials, the material law does not use a value of E. You will therefore have to estimate E for such materials.– You can simply scale a modulus value from the appropriate

portion of the stress-strain curve.– Or, estimate an initial modulus by E = 6(a + b) where a and b

are the first two Mooney-Rivlin constants.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-16



Training Manual


• For flexible components (beam-like and shell-like models) the stiffness of the system may be much lower than the Hertz contact stiffness.

• In this situation you might run a static analysis with a unit load applied to the expected area of contact to determine the local stiffness of the model. The contact stiffness can then be estimated from:

k = fbend(P/)

• where P is the applied unit load, is the corresponding deflection, and for flexible body contact, fbend is a factor between 1 and 100. Setting fbend = 1 is usually a good starting value.

• For practical simplicity, you might merely estimate the contact stiffness by: k = fbulk x E/10

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-17



Training Manual


• The same issues about convergence and accuracy must be addressed with the tangential penalty stiffness.– Too soft a value leads to inaccurate results.– Too stiff a value causes convergence difficulties.– A “best” value should be determined by trial-and-error.

• As a starting estimate, try usingktangent = 0.01 knormal

– This is the default value for most ANSYS contact elements.

• Of course, the tangent stress is limited by the value at which sliding occurs: xp– Friction is discussed in the next chapter.

October 15, 2001

Inventory # 001567

3-18



Training Manual

Contact Stiffness... Appendix – Calculating a value• For node-to-node and node-to-surface elements, you specify the value of penalty stiffness directly, in units of Force/Length.

– For variable mesh densities, the overall surface stiffness will be greater where the mesh is denser, and will be less where the mesh is coarser.• This could lead to uneven contact pressures.

• Because the penalty stiffness for surface-to-surface elements is specified per unit area, the overall surface stiffness varies much less with varying mesh density.

(Surfaces shown separated for clarity)

F

Stiffer at dense meshSofter at coarse mesh

Documents

Contact Stiffness Chapter Three. Training Manual October 15, 2001 Inventory # 001567 3-2 Contact Stiffness A. Basic Concepts Review: Recall that all ANSYS