Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONFERENCECONVERTING YOUR
Professor Dr Zulikha JamaludinUniversiti Utara [email protected] 2014, UPM 17th Sept 2014.
ARTICLE
ARTICLE
INTO AJOURNAL
THE STRUCTURE OF A
PAPERRESEARCH
THE STRUCTURETITLE
ABSTRACT +keywords
INTRODUCTION
BODY
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
GENERAL
PARTICULAR
PARTICULAR
GENERAL
CHOOSING THE
EXAMPLE
Interaction design theory
Bahasa Melayu reading pattern of
dyslexic children in Kedah.
An Automatic Reading Tutor
Framework Using Speech
Recognition And Interaction Design
SHORT – 15 words at most
Easy to understand
Reflects the objective of the paper (clear relationship between DV & IV)
It is a ‘promise’
“..a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the article.” “..can be the most important paragraph in the article.”
?WHAT IS AN
Abstracts are published separately from articles in on-line indices, SO MAKE IT CLEAR.
?WHAT IS AN
Accurate
Self-contained
Concise and specific
5% of article or 500 words at most
THE ‘MUST HAVE’ IN
THE MESSAGE TO DELIVER
OF GOOD ABSTRACTS
In the last years there has been a high production of groupware systems. However, most of these systems have been based on the desktop metaphor. We propose a translation process based on the use of the conceptual model (or, particularly, on the task model and the data model) of the original application. From this model and by means of a pattern-based reengineering process, we obtain mobile versions of the original systems. In this paper the user interface reengineering process is described and an example of the application of patterns for the evolution of a specific system, Domosim-TPC, is shown.
OF GOOD ABSTRACTS
In this paper, we present a speaker verification system based on the Hidden Markov Models and Least Mean Square (LMS) adaptive filtering. The aim of using LMS adaptive filtering is to improve the HMMs performance in noisy environments. A Malay spoken digit database is used for the testing and validation modules. It is shown that, in a clean environment a Total Success Rate (TSR) of 89.97% is achieved using HMMs. For speaker verification, the true speaker rejection rate is 25.3% while the impostor acceptance rate is 9.99% and the equal error rate (EER) is 16.66%. In noisy environments without LMS adaptive filtering TSRs of between 43.07%-46.40% are achieved for Signal to Noise Ratios (SNRs) of 0-30 dBs. Meanwhile, after LMS filtering, TSRs of between 51.26%-54.86% are achieved for SNRs 0-30 dB.
KEYWORDSSELECTION
NOTES ON
Choose keywords with enough
search volumeChoose long tail keywords
Use the keywords in
the article title
Use sparingly in the body –
not overstated
INTRODUCTION
BODY
CONCLUSION
Provide problem &
hook (significant)
State claim
NOT in the form of
research report title
Tell what we have
already told
NO NEW input
INTRODUCTION
dyslexic children and pesona
design
primary pesona reading pattern
requirement definition document
Storyboard with interaction design
analysis
the DC-READ prototype
CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION BODY CONCLUSION
EXTRABE
PARTICULAR
INTRODUCTION
CREATE A HOOKKEY FOR GOOD PAPER
INTRODUCTION
Intro =your entrance lawn
INTRODUCTION
Intro =your entrance lawn
INTRODUCTION
Intro =your face!
INTRODUCTION
Intro =your face!
TH
E IN
TR
OD
UC
TIO
N TEMPLATE
“In studying <1- the semantic meaning of thetopic>, these keywords is operationally defined as<2- the operational definition of the keywordsappeared in the title>. As such <3-major problems>will be examined. In order to do so, <4- thevariables related to major problems> must beinvestigated. So that in the end <5- the claim or thesignificance>can be shown/proven.“
Note:Items 2, 3, 4 – can be more than one variable.
USIN
G T
HE T
EM
PLA
TE
EXAMPLE
In studying websites trustworthiness, types of e-frauds and their characteristics will be examined. In order to do so, techniques of identifying e-fraud in websites must be investigated. So that in the end, a generalize method for curbing e-frauds can be shown
The scene
The ‘bridge’
The claim
CONCLUSIONW
RIT
ING
TH
E Midastouchit is about leaving a magical impact
Intro repeatingNearest closing
Objective emphasisQuotation
Anecdote closingNatural closing
SummaryDirect statement
TYPES
Where do they ?
TITL
E (1
00
0)
AB
STR
AC
T (1
00
)
INTR
O (
10
0)
CO
NC
LUSI
ON
(1
00
)
REF
EREN
CE
(50
)
BO
DY
1 (
10
)
BO
DY
2 (
10
)
BO
DY
n (
3)
H TMAPInclude ref from
the target journal’s articles
JOURNALARTICLECONFERENCE vs
Refer hand-out
EDITFORFORM…then
GRAMMAR
Disturbing
Critical
Average
Adapted from Funk, McMahan & Day (2000). The Craft of
Editing.Springer-Verlag
Run-on sentenceIts/it’sSpelling mistakes:
effect/affect
Mechanics: list, bullets, commaNon-parallelVerb disagreement
Different from/thanCompare with/toSplit infinitive
MECHANICS OF WRITING
LIST?
Parallel?
Punctuation?
QUOTATION?PARAGRAPHING?
CO
NTR
OLLIN
G S
EN
TEN
CE?
COLON?COMMA?
TIPSON SELECTING
LIST 10 PEER REVIEWED
JOURNALS IN YOUR FIELD
WHERE YOU COULD PUBLISH
NEVER SUBMIT TO A
JOURNAL YOU NEVER READ
TALK TO YOUR LIBRARIAN
JOURNALS
CRITERIA in choosing a
JOURNALSc
op
e o
f jo
urn
al
Ind
exin
g
Imp
act
fact
or
Pu
blic
atio
n f
req
uen
cy
Du
rati
on
to
pu
blis
h
Du
rati
on
of
revi
ew
Frie
nd
lines
s o
f ed
ito
r
Rej
ecti
on
rat
e
Ref
eren
ce
INDEXEDJOURNAL?
IEEE(IEL /IEEE Xplore)
Ei
Scopus(ScieVerse)
ACM
CO
MP
EN
DEX
ELSEVIER
ISI (Thompson)
WEB
OF S
CIEN
CE
LEVELS ofPRESTIGE
CONFERENCE
NON-INDEXED JOURNAL
INDEXED JOURNAL
JOURNALARTICLESADHERING TO THE FORMAT
Sure way to annoy a
reviewer: do a poor job of
formatting your paper
Many journal editors are
going to do a format
check before the reviewer
even sees the manuscript
JOURNALARTICLESADHERING TO THE FORMAT
JICT-UUM –refer formathttp://jict.uum.edu.my
THE
PR
OC
ESS
of
pu
blis
hin
g a
pap
erin
a jo
urn
al
Every review is gold dust
Be truly grateful for criticism as well
as praise
(This is really, really, really
hard but it’s really, really,
really, really, really, really Important)
LISTENINGTOYOUR REVIEWERS
Submission – online/email editor-in-chief ( jict.uum.edu.my)
Technical editor review board/editor-in-chief
Editorial review board – peer review
Results – 2-10 weeks
Acceptance? Reject?
Amendments + rebuttal– 2 weeks
Copyright agreement
Publish 1-2 years
WH
AT’s
NEXT?STEPS IN PUBLISHING YOUR WORK
