26
INTELLIGENT MACHINING & PROCESS CONTROL : Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization Process stability monitoring Acoustic and vibration monitoring LabVIEW based signal processing

Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

  • View
    239

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

INTELLIGENT MACHINING & PROCESS CONTROL :

Cost optimization in machining

• Tool wear monitoring• Practical tool wear metrology

• Continuous optimization

• Process stability monitoring • Acoustic and vibration monitoring

• LabVIEW based signal processing

Page 2: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Sponsor: General Dynamics - OTSCoach: Dr. Tim DalrympleLiaison Engineer: Mr. Keith Brown

William Dressel (ISE)Kevin Pham (EE)Steven Stone (CSC)Sean Sullivan (ME)Phan Vu (ME)

Team:

Page 3: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

MACHINELOGIC

Pipe Coupling

Page 4: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Minimize work piece costDetermine tool cost

○ Monitor wear and end of life○ Implement practical metrology

Determine machining costBalance the process to minimize cost

blackbetty420.com

Project Goals & Objectives MACHINELOGIC

Page 5: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Project Goals & Objectives

Provide feedback to digital manufacturing frameworkDevelop data acquisition systemAutomate data and error loggingMonitor machine stability: chatter

detection

MACHINELOGIC

Page 6: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Minimizing Work Piece CostCp = Cfix + Cm + Ct

Cp = Cost per part

Cfix = Fixed cost associated with the cost of the material

Cm = Machining cost

Ct = Tooling cost related to tool life and tool change time

T = C (v)p (fr)q

T = Tool life

v = Cutting speed

fr = Feed rate

C, p, and q = Constants

MACHINELOGIC

Page 7: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Minimizing Cost ProcedureRearrange Cost per part equation:

Take partial derivatives:

Optimal cutting speed:

𝐶𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡 = 𝑐𝑓𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 +ሺ𝜋𝐷𝑚𝐿ሻቆ𝑟𝑚𝑣𝑓𝑟+ 𝑡𝑐ℎ𝑟𝑚 +𝐶𝑡𝑒𝐶𝑣−𝑝+1𝑓𝑟−𝑞+1ቇ

𝜕𝐶𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝜕𝑣 = ሺ𝜋𝐷𝑚𝐿ሻቈ− 𝑟𝑚𝑣2𝑓𝑟+𝑡𝑐ℎ𝑟𝑚 +𝐶𝑡𝑒𝐶𝑓𝑟−𝑞+1 ሺ𝑝−1ሻ𝑣𝑝−2 = 0

𝜕𝐶𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝜕𝑓𝑟 = ሺ𝜋𝐷𝑚𝐿ሻ− 𝑟𝑚𝑣𝑓𝑟2+𝑡𝑐ℎ𝑟𝑚 +𝐶𝑡𝑒𝐶𝑣−𝑝+1 ሺ𝑞−1ሻ𝑓𝑟𝑞−2൨= 0

𝑣𝑜𝑝𝑡 =ቈ𝐶𝑟𝑚

ሺ𝑝−1ሻሺ𝑡𝑐ℎ𝑟𝑚 +𝐶𝑡𝑒ሻ𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑞 1/𝑝

MACHINELOGIC

Page 8: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Determining Tool Life Through Flank Wear Width

Microscope: Dino-Lite® Wyko Profilometer

Device Cost: $400

Device Cost: $180,000

MACHINELOGIC

Page 9: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Tool Wear Analysis Results

MACHINELOGIC

Page 10: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Calculating Optimum Machining Parameters

Nominal Cutting Speed

Nominal Feed Rate

6338 in/min

.02 in/rev

Suggested Cutting Speed

Suggested FeedRate

6972 in/min(~110%)

.02 in/rev

Optimal Cutting Speed

Optimal Feed Rate

9066 in/min

.02 in/rev

Nominal SuggestedOptimal

MACHINELOGIC

Page 11: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Machining Controller Solution INPUT SYSTEM OUTPUT

Human Machine Interface

Data Acquisition System

Computer

LabVIEW

Analyze Data

Human Machine Interface

Log Data

MACHINELOGIC

Power

Vibration

Audio

Page 12: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

OKUMA LC-40 Lathe

Load Controls UPC

CM100 Microphone Kistler Accelerometer

MACHINELOGIC

Page 13: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Prototype GUIMACHINELOGIC

Page 14: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Chatter Detection: Variance

MACHINELOGIC

Page 15: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Chatter Detection: FFT

Model boring bar as fixed-pinned cylinder Calculate natural frequency 1st mode = 3047 Hz Sample signal at 10 kHz Nyquist frequency of 5 kHz

𝝎𝒏= 𝜷𝟐𝟐𝝅ඨ 𝑬𝑰𝝆𝑨𝒄𝑳𝟒

MACHINELOGIC

Page 16: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Chatter Detection: FFTMACHINELOGIC

Page 17: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Signal Process Analog Filtering

Blue – Sampled Frequency Red - Aliased Frequencies

MACHINELOGIC

Page 18: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Sallen-Key Gain in passband: 1

Gain at cutoff (7kHz): 1/2

Design & Test: Low Pass Filter

MACHINELOGIC

Page 19: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Low Pass Filter ResultsMACHINELOGIC

Page 20: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 56 13,351 $3,894 11.9%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 340 80,110 $23,36514.7%

1 Based on 10 hour shift2 Based on one shift per day, 235 work days per year

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 58 13,749 $9,36228.5%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 351 82,494 $56,17335.2%

Roughing Operations Optimized with Suggested Machining Parameters

All Operations Optimized

Return on InvestmentMACHINELOGIC

Page 21: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 56 13,351 $3,894 11.9%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 340 80,110 $23,36514.7%

1 Based on 10 hour shift2 Based on one shift per day, 235 work days per year

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 58 13,749 $9,36228.5%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 351 82,494 $56,17335.2%

Roughing Operations Optimized with Suggested Machining Parameters

All Operations Optimized

Return on InvestmentMACHINELOGIC

Page 22: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 56 13,351 $3,894 11.9%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 340 80,110 $23,36514.7%

1 Based on 10 hour shift2 Based on one shift per day, 235 work days per year

Initial Investment

Cost Per Unit

Units Ordered

Total Investment

Cost Saved

Per Part

Parts Produced Per Shift1

Parts Produced Per Year2

Cost Saved

Per Year2 R.o.I.

Prototype Investment

$20,000 $12,808 1 $32,808 $0.29 58 13,749 $9,36228.5%

Industry Level Investment

$106,000 $8,893 6 $159,358 $0.29 351 82,494 $56,17335.2%

Roughing Operations Optimized with Suggested Machining Parameters

All Operations Optimized

Return on InvestmentMACHINELOGIC

Page 23: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Conclusion

Cost savings achieved through higher cutting speeds

Limited by stability issuesData acquisition system can help address

stability issuesAcoustic data more suitable for detecting

chatter

MACHINELOGIC

Page 24: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Recommendations for Future Develop alternative for LabVIEW Store logged data in database Automatically handle chatter through

lathe control panel Continue tool wear analysis

Automate tool wear measuring process Continue power data analysis

MACHINELOGIC

Page 25: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Questions?

Page 26: Cost optimization in machining Tool wear monitoring Tool wear monitoring Practical tool wear metrology Practical tool wear metrology Continuous optimization

Special Thanks to:

IPPD Program General Dynamics Dr. Dean Bartles Dr. Keith Stanfill Mr. Keith Brown Dr. Tim Dalrymple Dr. John Schueller Mr. Gun Lee