deegan5ech

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    1/51

    3-1Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Chapter 3

    Theories of financial

    accounting

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    2/51

    3-2Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Objectives

    • Be able to describe various normative and positivetheories of financial accounting

    • Be aware of some of the limitations of the various

    theories of accounting

    •  Appreciate that there is no single unified theory ofaccounting

    • Understand the various pressures and motivations that

    might have an effect on the methods of accounting

    selected by an organisation• Understand what is meant by ‘creative accounting’ and

    why it might occur 

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    3/51

    3-3Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theory definition

    •  A coherent group of propositions or principles forminga general framework of reference for a field of inquiry

    •  Accounting theories explain and predict accounting

    practice positive theories! or prescribe particular

    practice normative theories!

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    4/51

    3-'Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    • "ositive Accounting #heory is an example of anexample of a positive theory of accounting$ As we willsee later% there are other positive theories ofaccounting as well as normative theories ofaccounting!

    • "A# &xplains and predicts accounting practice• 'oes not seek to prescribe particular actions

    • (rounded in economic theory

    • )ocuses on the relationships between various

    individuals involved in providing resources to anorganisation agency relationship! * owners and managers

     * managers and debt providers

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    5/51

    3-"Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

     Agency theory•  Agency relationship

     * delegation of decision making from the principal to the agent

    •  Agency problem

     * delegation of authority can lead to loss of efficiency andincreased costs

    •  Agency costs

     * costs that arise as a result of the agency relationship

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    6/51

    3-(Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

     Agency costs• +onitoring costs

    • Bonding expenditures

    • ,esidual loss

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    7/51

    3-7Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

     Assumptions of "A#•  All individual action is driven by self-interest do we

    think this is a realistic assumption.!

    • /ndividuals will act in an opportunistic manner to

    increase their wealth• 0otions of loyalty and morality are not incorporated

    within the theory

    • 1rganisations are a collection of self-interested

    individuals who agree to cooperate to the extent it is intheir interest

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    8/51

    3-)Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    "A# predictions• 1rganisations will seek to put in place mechanisms

    to align the interests of managers of the firm agents!

    with the interests of the owners principals!

    • 2ome of these mechanisms rely on the output of theaccounting system

     * for example% the owners might agree to pay the manager a

    bonus based on a specified percentage of profits

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    9/51

    3-*Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    &fficiency and opportunistic perspectives of "A#• &fficiency perspective

     * mechanisms are put in place up front with the ob3ective of minimisingfuture agency costs )or example% reward structures might be implemented to motivate and

    retain managers% perhaps by providing them with bonuses tied toaccounting profits% or providing them with shares or options

    4oluntary audits might be undertaken to reduce the perceived risks ofinvestors

     * referred to as ex ante perspective * accounting methods adopted by firms best reflect the underlying

    financial performance of the entity * might select the most efficientway to portray the performance of the entity

     * regulation is therefore argued by "A# advocates to imposeunwarranted costs on reporting entities * causes the firm to providean inefficient perspective of the performance and position of theorganisation as it requires movement to a one-si5e-fits-all approachto reporting

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    10/51

    3-10Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    &fficiency and opportunistic perspectives of "A# cont$!• 1pportunistic perspective

     * considers opportunistic actions that could be taken once

    various contractual arrangements have been put in place

    )or example% once a profit sharing scheme has been put in place

    to motivate managers to increase the value of the organisationthat is% put in place for efficiency reasons!% managers will * to

    the extent they can get away with it * be predicted to try to

    manipulate reported profits so as to generate the greatest wealth

    transfer to themselves

     * assumes managers will opportunistically select accountingmethods to increase their own personal wealth

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    11/51

    3-11Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    1wner6+anager contracting

    • +anagers assumed to act in their own self-interest

    at the expense of owners

     * ‘,ational economic person’ assumption• +anagers have access to information not available

    to principals

     * /nformation asymmetry

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    12/51

    3-12Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    1wner6+anager contracting cont$!

    • +ethods of reducing agency costs of equity

     * price protection

     *monitoring by owners

     * bonding by managers

     * managers may be rewarded7

    on a fixed basis

    on the basis of the results achieved

    on a basis that combines the two

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    13/51

    3-13Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    Bonus schemes• ,emuneration based on the output of the accounting

    system

    • 4ery common and their existence can be explained by

    "A#• Bonuses might be based on7

     * profits of the firm

     * sales of the firm

     * return on assets• +ay also be rewarded based on market price of

    shares

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    14/51

    3-1'Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

     Accounting-based bonus schemes

    •  Any changes in the accounting methods used by the

    organisation will affect the bonuses paid e$g$ as a

    result of a new accounting standard!

    • 8hanging the bonuses paid impacts cash flows% andthis in turn is predicted to impact the value of the

    organisation

    • 8ontracts may rely on ‘floating’% generally accepted

    accounting principles

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    15/51

    3-1"Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    /ncentives to manipulate accounting numbers

    • ,ewarding managers on the basis of accounting

    profits can induce them subsequently to manipulate

    the related accounting numbers to improve theirapparent performance and thus the related rewards

    •  Accounting profits might not always provide an

    unbiased measure of a firm’s performance * so also

    common to find the use of share-based reward

    structures% which in certain circumstances% might be

    deemed to be more efficient

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    16/51

    3-1(Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    +arket-based bonus schemes

    • +arket prices are assumed to be influenced by

    expectations about the net present value of

    expected future cash flows• 8ash bonuses might be awarded on the basis of

    increases in share prices

    • 2hares or options to shares might also be provided

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    17/51

    3-17Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    +arket-based bonus schemes

    • +arket prices reflect market-wide factors% not 3ust

    those factors controlled by the manager 

    • 1nly senior management will be likely to be able toaffect cash flows and hence securities prices

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    18/51

    3-1)Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.),ole of auditor • /f managers’ remuneration is based on accounting

    numbers the auditor takes a monitoring role

    • #he auditor arbitrates on the reasonableness of the

    accounting methods adopted• 2ome research indicates that the greater the

    separation between managers and owners% and the

    greater the reliance on external debt meaning greater

    potential agency costs!% the greater the likelihood thatvoluntary financial statements would be undertaken

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    19/51

    3-1*Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    1ther mechanisms that align the interests of managers

    and owners

    • #hreat of takeovers to underperforming firms

    •  A well-informed labour market

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    20/51

    3-20Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)'ebt contracting

    •  Agency costs of debt7

     * excess dividends

     * claim dilution

     * asset substitution

     * investment in risky pro3ects

    • 9hen discussing the agency costs of debt it is

    assumed that the managers’ interests are aligned with

    the shareholders’ interests

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    21/51

    3-21Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    9ays to minimise the agency costs of debt

    • "rice protection

     * higher interest charges to compensate for risk

    • 8ontracting * interest coverage clauses

     * debt to asset clauses

    :everage clauses frequently used in Australian bank loan

    contracts

    • +onitoring

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    22/51

    3-22Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)"olitical costs

    • 8osts that groups external to the firm might be able to impose onthe firm7 * increased taxes

     * increased wage claims

     * product boycotts * decreased subsidies

    • 1rganisations are affected by governments% trade unions%environmental lobby groups or particular consumer groups

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    23/51

    3-23Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)"olitical costs cont$!• 'emands placed on the firm might be affected by

    accounting results

     * higher reported profits

     * how accounting numbers are generated is not important

    •  Accounting numbers might be used as a means of

    providing ‘excuses’ for effecting wealth transfers in the

    political process

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    24/51

    3-2'Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

    (cont.)

    9ays to reduce political costs

    • +anagement might7

     * adopt income-reducing accounting techniques

     * make voluntary social disclosures

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    25/51

    3-2"Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Discussion leads to 3 ain hypotheses of

    PAT

    • The bonus plan hypothesis is that managers of firmswith bonus plans are more likely to use accounting

    methods that increase current period reported income. 

    • The debt/equity hypothesis predicts that the higher the

    firm’s debt/equity ratio, the more likely managers use

    accounting methods that increase income. 

    • The political cost hypothesis predicts that large firms

    rather than small firms are more likely to use

    accounting choices that reduce reported profits. 

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    26/51

    3-2(Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    PAT in suary

    • 2election of accounting methods can be explained by eitherefficiency or opportunistic arguments

    •  Accounting methods can impact on cash flows associated with

    debt and management compensation contracts

    • #hese effects can be used to explain why particular accounting

    methods are used• #he use of particular accounting methods can have conflicting

    effects

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    27/51

    3-27Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Accounting policy selection

    and disclosure

    • #o allow comparison between reporting entities

     * a summary of accounting policies must be presented in the

    notes to the financial report AA2B ;

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    28/51

    3-2)Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Accounting policy selection

    and disclosure (cont.)

     Accounting policy choice and ‘creative accounting’

    • ‘8reative accounting’ refers to selecting accounting

    methods that provide the result desired by the

    preparers

    •  Also known as opportunistic

    • 8an be explained by "A#

    • /t is possible to be creative and still follow

    accounting standards

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    29/51

    3-2*Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Criticiss of PAT

    • 'oes not provide prescription so does not provide a means of

    improving accounting practice

    • 0ot value-free but rather value-laden

    • Underlying assumption of wealth maximisation is simplistic

    • /ssues being addressed have not shown any significant

    development• 2cientifically flawed

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    30/51

    3-30Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories

    • 2eek to provide guidance in selecting accounting

    procedures that are most appropriate

    • "rescribe what should  be done

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    31/51

    3-31Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories ( cont.)

    #he 8onceptual )ramework7• is considered a normative theory

    • seeks to identify the ob3ective of ("),

    • seeks to provide recognition and measurement rules

    within a ‘coherent’ and ‘consistent’ framework• identifies the qualitative characteristics financial

    information should  possess

    • makes recommendations that depart from current

    practice

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    32/51

    3-32Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories ( cont.)

    1ther normative theories• #hree main classifications

    ;$ current-cost accounting

    >$ exit-price accounting

    @$ deprival-value accounting

    • #hese theories addressed issues associated with

    changing prices

    • 'eveloped in ;?

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    33/51

    3-33Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories ( cont.)

    8urrent-cost accounting•  Aim is to provide a calculation of income that% after

    ad3usting for changing prices% can be withdrawn from

    the entity and still leave the physical capital operating

    capacity! of the entity intact

     * referred to as true measure of income

    • #rue income theories propose a single measurement

    basis for assets and a resultant single measure of

    income profit!

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    34/51

    3-3'Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories ( cont.)

    &xit-price accounting

    • 8ontinuously 8ontemporary Accounting

    • Uses exit or selling prices to value the entity’s assets and

    liabilities

     * referred to as current cash equivalents

    •  Assumptions7 * firms exist to increase the wealth of their owners

     * the ability to adapt to changing circumstances

     * capacity to adapt best reflected by current selling prices

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    35/51

    3-3"Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    !orative accounting theories ( cont.)

    'eprival-value accounting• 'eprival value represents the amount of loss thatmight be incurred by an entity if it were deprived of theuse of an asset and the associated economic benefits

    • #his method considers7

     * the net selling price

     * the present value of future cash flows

     * an asset’s current replacement cost

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    36/51

    3-3(Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories

    2ystems-oriented theories• #hese theories focus on the role of information and

    disclosure in the relationships betweenorganisations% the 2tate% individuals and groups

    • #he entity is assumed to be influenced by thesociety in which it operates and to have an influenceon it

    • 2ystems-based theories include7 * stakeholder #heory

     * legitimacy #heory

     * institutional #heory

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    37/51

    3-37Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    2takeholder #heory

    • #wo branches

    ;$ &thical normative! branch

    >$ +anagerial positive! branch

    • &thical normative! branch * stakeholders are any group or individual who can affect or are

    affected by the achievement of the firm’s ob3ectives

     * includes shareholders% employees% customers% lenders%suppliers% local charities% interest groups% government% etc$

     * all stakeholders have a right to be provided with information

     * because it prescribes how stakeholders should be treated based

    on various ethical perspectives!% it is a normative approach

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    38/51

    3-3)Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    2takeholder #heory cont$!

    • +anagerial positive! branch

     * seeks to explain and predict  how an organisation will react to

    demands of various stakeholders

     * relative power or importance of stakeholders considered

     * relative power and importance can change across timeCassociated

    with control of resources

     * the firm will take actions to ‘manage’ its relationships with

    stakeholders

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    39/51

    3-3*Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    2takeholder #heory cont$!• 2takeholder #heory either branch! does not prescribe

    what information should be disclosed% other than

    indicating that the provision of information can be

    useful for the continued operations of the entity

    • +anagerial branch cont$!

     * financial and social information is used to control conflicting

    demands of various stakeholder groups

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    40/51

    3-'0Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    :egitimacy #heory• 1rganisations continually seek to ensure that they

    operate within the bounds and norms of society

    • 1rganisations attempt to ensure their activities are

    perceived to be legitimate• Bounds and norms change across time

    • Based on a ‘social contract’ between society and the

    organisation

    • 9here this social contract is perceived as beingbreached then the organisation will take corrective

    action% and this action might include disclosure

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    41/51

    3-'1Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    :egitimacy #heory cont$!• 1rganisations must appear to consider the rights of

    the public at large% not 3ust investors

    • #o gain or maintain legitimacy% organisations might rely

    on disclosure within their annual report

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    42/51

    3-'2Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "ystes#oriented theories (cont.)

    /nstitutional #heory

    • &xplains why organisations within particular ‘fields’ tend to take

    on similar characteristics and form

    • +uch overlap with :egitimacy #heory and 2takeholder #heory

    • #wo main dimensions to the theory * isomorphism and

    decoupling• /somorphism

     * coercive

     * mimetic

     * normative

    • 'ecoupling * actual practices can be very different from formally sanctioned and

    publicly pronounced processes and practices

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    43/51

    3-'3Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theories e$plaining %hy regulation

    is introduced

    • Dust as there are theories to explain why particular

    accounting disclosures are made "A#% :egitimacy

    #heory% 2takeholder #heory!% or why particular

    organisational forms exist institutional theory!% there

    are also theories to explain why particularregulations for example% accounting regulations!

    are developed$ 2uch theories include7

     * "ublic interest theory

     * 8apture theory * &conomic interest group theory

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    44/51

    3-''Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is

    introduced (cont.)

    "ublic interest theory

    • ,egulation put in place to benefit society as a whole

    rather than vested interests

    • ,egulatory body considered to represent the interests

    of the society in which it operates% rather than theprivate interests of the regulators

    •  Assumes that government is a neutral arbiter 

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    45/51

    3-'"Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is

    introduced (cont.)

    8apture theory

    • #he regulated seeks to take charge capture! the

    regulator 

    • #hey seek to ensure rules subsequently released are

    advantageous to the parties sub3ect to regulation

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    46/51

    3-'(Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is

    introduced (cont.)

    &conomic interest group theory

    •  Assumes groups will form to protect particulareconomic interests

    • (roups are often in conflict with each other and will

    lobby government to put in place legislation that willbenefit themat the expense of others

    • 0o notion of public interest inherent in the theory

    • ,egulators and all other individuals! deemed to bemotivated by self-interest

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    47/51

    3-'7Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is

    introduced (cont.)

    &conomic interest group theory cont$!• #he regulator is not a neutral arbiter but is seen as an interest

    group

    • ,egulator is motivated to ensure re-election or maintenance of itsposition of power 

    • ,egulation serves the private interests of politically effectivegroups

    • #hose groups with insufficient power will not be able to lobbyeffectively for regulation to protect their own interests

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    48/51

    3-')Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "uary

    • #he chapter describes various theories that relate to financial

    accounting• 0o single accounting theory is universally accepted

    • "ositive #heory of Accounting

     * seeks to explain and predict accounting-related phenomena

     * e$g$ study of capital market’s reaction to particular accounting

    policies% what motivates managers to select a given method

    of accounting% reasons for the existence of particular

    accounting-based contracts

     * relies upon a fundamental assumption that individual action

    can be predicted on the basis that all action is driven by a

    desire to maximise wealth a perspective often criticised byother researchers!

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    49/51

    3-'*Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "uary (cont.)

    0ormative theories of accounting

     * prescribe how accounting should be practised * argue typically that a central role of accounting theory is

    to provide prescriptionCinform about optimal accountingapproaches and why a particular approach is consideredoptimal

     * examples7 8onceptual )ramework "ro3ect% current-costaccounting% exit-price accounting and deprival-valueaccounting

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    50/51

    3-"0Copyright

     2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd

    "uary (cont.)

    2ystems-based theories

    • /nclude 2takeholder #heory% :egitimacy #heory% and /nstitutional

    #heory

     * see organisation as firmly embedded within a broader social

    system

     * organisation is considered to be affected by% and to affect% thesociety in which it operates

     * accounting disclosures and particular organisational forms are

    seen as a way to manage relations with particular groups

    outside the organisationC organisational activities and

    accounting disclosures are considered to be reactive tocommunity pressuresChow a firm operates and what it

    reports must be determined upon consideration of various

    stakeholder expectations

  • 8/17/2019 deegan5ech

    51/51

    "uary (cont.)

    #heories that seek to explain how regulation is

    developed• 2ome theories suggest that regulation is introduced to

    serve the public interest by regulators who work for thepublic good

    • 1ther theories of regulation assume that the development

    of regulation is driven by considerations of self-interest• 1verall% the selection of one theory over another will

    depend on the views and expectations of the researcherin question

    • 0o one theory of accounting can be described as a ‘best’theoryChowever% different theoretical perspectives can at

    various times provide valuable insights in accountingissues