Upload
lamoma389
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
1/51
3-1Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Chapter 3
Theories of financial
accounting
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
2/51
3-2Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Objectives
• Be able to describe various normative and positivetheories of financial accounting
• Be aware of some of the limitations of the various
theories of accounting
• Appreciate that there is no single unified theory ofaccounting
• Understand the various pressures and motivations that
might have an effect on the methods of accounting
selected by an organisation• Understand what is meant by ‘creative accounting’ and
why it might occur
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
3/51
3-3Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theory definition
• A coherent group of propositions or principles forminga general framework of reference for a field of inquiry
• Accounting theories explain and predict accounting
practice positive theories! or prescribe particular
practice normative theories!
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
4/51
3-'Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
• "ositive Accounting #heory is an example of anexample of a positive theory of accounting$ As we willsee later% there are other positive theories ofaccounting as well as normative theories ofaccounting!
• "A# &xplains and predicts accounting practice• 'oes not seek to prescribe particular actions
• (rounded in economic theory
• )ocuses on the relationships between various
individuals involved in providing resources to anorganisation agency relationship! * owners and managers
* managers and debt providers
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
5/51
3-"Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
Agency theory• Agency relationship
* delegation of decision making from the principal to the agent
• Agency problem
* delegation of authority can lead to loss of efficiency andincreased costs
• Agency costs
* costs that arise as a result of the agency relationship
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
6/51
3-(Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
Agency costs• +onitoring costs
• Bonding expenditures
• ,esidual loss
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
7/51
3-7Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
Assumptions of "A#• All individual action is driven by self-interest do we
think this is a realistic assumption.!
• /ndividuals will act in an opportunistic manner to
increase their wealth• 0otions of loyalty and morality are not incorporated
within the theory
• 1rganisations are a collection of self-interested
individuals who agree to cooperate to the extent it is intheir interest
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
8/51
3-)Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
"A# predictions• 1rganisations will seek to put in place mechanisms
to align the interests of managers of the firm agents!
with the interests of the owners principals!
• 2ome of these mechanisms rely on the output of theaccounting system
* for example% the owners might agree to pay the manager a
bonus based on a specified percentage of profits
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
9/51
3-*Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
&fficiency and opportunistic perspectives of "A#• &fficiency perspective
* mechanisms are put in place up front with the ob3ective of minimisingfuture agency costs )or example% reward structures might be implemented to motivate and
retain managers% perhaps by providing them with bonuses tied toaccounting profits% or providing them with shares or options
4oluntary audits might be undertaken to reduce the perceived risks ofinvestors
* referred to as ex ante perspective * accounting methods adopted by firms best reflect the underlying
financial performance of the entity * might select the most efficientway to portray the performance of the entity
* regulation is therefore argued by "A# advocates to imposeunwarranted costs on reporting entities * causes the firm to providean inefficient perspective of the performance and position of theorganisation as it requires movement to a one-si5e-fits-all approachto reporting
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
10/51
3-10Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
&fficiency and opportunistic perspectives of "A# cont$!• 1pportunistic perspective
* considers opportunistic actions that could be taken once
various contractual arrangements have been put in place
)or example% once a profit sharing scheme has been put in place
to motivate managers to increase the value of the organisationthat is% put in place for efficiency reasons!% managers will * to
the extent they can get away with it * be predicted to try to
manipulate reported profits so as to generate the greatest wealth
transfer to themselves
* assumes managers will opportunistically select accountingmethods to increase their own personal wealth
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
11/51
3-11Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
1wner6+anager contracting
• +anagers assumed to act in their own self-interest
at the expense of owners
* ‘,ational economic person’ assumption• +anagers have access to information not available
to principals
* /nformation asymmetry
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
12/51
3-12Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
1wner6+anager contracting cont$!
• +ethods of reducing agency costs of equity
* price protection
*monitoring by owners
* bonding by managers
* managers may be rewarded7
on a fixed basis
on the basis of the results achieved
on a basis that combines the two
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
13/51
3-13Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
Bonus schemes• ,emuneration based on the output of the accounting
system
• 4ery common and their existence can be explained by
"A#• Bonuses might be based on7
* profits of the firm
* sales of the firm
* return on assets• +ay also be rewarded based on market price of
shares
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
14/51
3-1'Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
Accounting-based bonus schemes
• Any changes in the accounting methods used by the
organisation will affect the bonuses paid e$g$ as a
result of a new accounting standard!
• 8hanging the bonuses paid impacts cash flows% andthis in turn is predicted to impact the value of the
organisation
• 8ontracts may rely on ‘floating’% generally accepted
accounting principles
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
15/51
3-1"Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
/ncentives to manipulate accounting numbers
• ,ewarding managers on the basis of accounting
profits can induce them subsequently to manipulate
the related accounting numbers to improve theirapparent performance and thus the related rewards
• Accounting profits might not always provide an
unbiased measure of a firm’s performance * so also
common to find the use of share-based reward
structures% which in certain circumstances% might be
deemed to be more efficient
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
16/51
3-1(Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
+arket-based bonus schemes
• +arket prices are assumed to be influenced by
expectations about the net present value of
expected future cash flows• 8ash bonuses might be awarded on the basis of
increases in share prices
• 2hares or options to shares might also be provided
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
17/51
3-17Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
+arket-based bonus schemes
• +arket prices reflect market-wide factors% not 3ust
those factors controlled by the manager
• 1nly senior management will be likely to be able toaffect cash flows and hence securities prices
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
18/51
3-1)Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.),ole of auditor • /f managers’ remuneration is based on accounting
numbers the auditor takes a monitoring role
• #he auditor arbitrates on the reasonableness of the
accounting methods adopted• 2ome research indicates that the greater the
separation between managers and owners% and the
greater the reliance on external debt meaning greater
potential agency costs!% the greater the likelihood thatvoluntary financial statements would be undertaken
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
19/51
3-1*Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
1ther mechanisms that align the interests of managers
and owners
• #hreat of takeovers to underperforming firms
• A well-informed labour market
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
20/51
3-20Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)'ebt contracting
• Agency costs of debt7
* excess dividends
* claim dilution
* asset substitution
* investment in risky pro3ects
• 9hen discussing the agency costs of debt it is
assumed that the managers’ interests are aligned with
the shareholders’ interests
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
21/51
3-21Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
9ays to minimise the agency costs of debt
• "rice protection
* higher interest charges to compensate for risk
• 8ontracting * interest coverage clauses
* debt to asset clauses
:everage clauses frequently used in Australian bank loan
contracts
• +onitoring
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
22/51
3-22Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)"olitical costs
• 8osts that groups external to the firm might be able to impose onthe firm7 * increased taxes
* increased wage claims
* product boycotts * decreased subsidies
• 1rganisations are affected by governments% trade unions%environmental lobby groups or particular consumer groups
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
23/51
3-23Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)"olitical costs cont$!• 'emands placed on the firm might be affected by
accounting results
* higher reported profits
* how accounting numbers are generated is not important
• Accounting numbers might be used as a means of
providing ‘excuses’ for effecting wealth transfers in the
political process
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
24/51
3-2'Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
(cont.)
9ays to reduce political costs
• +anagement might7
* adopt income-reducing accounting techniques
* make voluntary social disclosures
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
25/51
3-2"Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Discussion leads to 3 ain hypotheses of
PAT
• The bonus plan hypothesis is that managers of firmswith bonus plans are more likely to use accounting
methods that increase current period reported income.
• The debt/equity hypothesis predicts that the higher the
firm’s debt/equity ratio, the more likely managers use
accounting methods that increase income.
• The political cost hypothesis predicts that large firms
rather than small firms are more likely to use
accounting choices that reduce reported profits.
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
26/51
3-2(Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
PAT in suary
• 2election of accounting methods can be explained by eitherefficiency or opportunistic arguments
• Accounting methods can impact on cash flows associated with
debt and management compensation contracts
• #hese effects can be used to explain why particular accounting
methods are used• #he use of particular accounting methods can have conflicting
effects
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
27/51
3-27Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Accounting policy selection
and disclosure
• #o allow comparison between reporting entities
* a summary of accounting policies must be presented in the
notes to the financial report AA2B ;
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
28/51
3-2)Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Accounting policy selection
and disclosure (cont.)
Accounting policy choice and ‘creative accounting’
• ‘8reative accounting’ refers to selecting accounting
methods that provide the result desired by the
preparers
• Also known as opportunistic
• 8an be explained by "A#
• /t is possible to be creative and still follow
accounting standards
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
29/51
3-2*Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Criticiss of PAT
• 'oes not provide prescription so does not provide a means of
improving accounting practice
• 0ot value-free but rather value-laden
• Underlying assumption of wealth maximisation is simplistic
• /ssues being addressed have not shown any significant
development• 2cientifically flawed
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
30/51
3-30Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories
• 2eek to provide guidance in selecting accounting
procedures that are most appropriate
• "rescribe what should be done
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
31/51
3-31Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories ( cont.)
#he 8onceptual )ramework7• is considered a normative theory
• seeks to identify the ob3ective of ("),
• seeks to provide recognition and measurement rules
within a ‘coherent’ and ‘consistent’ framework• identifies the qualitative characteristics financial
information should possess
• makes recommendations that depart from current
practice
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
32/51
3-32Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories ( cont.)
1ther normative theories• #hree main classifications
;$ current-cost accounting
>$ exit-price accounting
@$ deprival-value accounting
• #hese theories addressed issues associated with
changing prices
• 'eveloped in ;?
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
33/51
3-33Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories ( cont.)
8urrent-cost accounting• Aim is to provide a calculation of income that% after
ad3usting for changing prices% can be withdrawn from
the entity and still leave the physical capital operating
capacity! of the entity intact
* referred to as true measure of income
• #rue income theories propose a single measurement
basis for assets and a resultant single measure of
income profit!
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
34/51
3-3'Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories ( cont.)
&xit-price accounting
• 8ontinuously 8ontemporary Accounting
• Uses exit or selling prices to value the entity’s assets and
liabilities
* referred to as current cash equivalents
• Assumptions7 * firms exist to increase the wealth of their owners
* the ability to adapt to changing circumstances
* capacity to adapt best reflected by current selling prices
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
35/51
3-3"Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
!orative accounting theories ( cont.)
'eprival-value accounting• 'eprival value represents the amount of loss thatmight be incurred by an entity if it were deprived of theuse of an asset and the associated economic benefits
• #his method considers7
* the net selling price
* the present value of future cash flows
* an asset’s current replacement cost
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
36/51
3-3(Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories
2ystems-oriented theories• #hese theories focus on the role of information and
disclosure in the relationships betweenorganisations% the 2tate% individuals and groups
• #he entity is assumed to be influenced by thesociety in which it operates and to have an influenceon it
• 2ystems-based theories include7 * stakeholder #heory
* legitimacy #heory
* institutional #heory
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
37/51
3-37Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
2takeholder #heory
• #wo branches
;$ &thical normative! branch
>$ +anagerial positive! branch
• &thical normative! branch * stakeholders are any group or individual who can affect or are
affected by the achievement of the firm’s ob3ectives
* includes shareholders% employees% customers% lenders%suppliers% local charities% interest groups% government% etc$
* all stakeholders have a right to be provided with information
* because it prescribes how stakeholders should be treated based
on various ethical perspectives!% it is a normative approach
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
38/51
3-3)Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
2takeholder #heory cont$!
• +anagerial positive! branch
* seeks to explain and predict how an organisation will react to
demands of various stakeholders
* relative power or importance of stakeholders considered
* relative power and importance can change across timeCassociated
with control of resources
* the firm will take actions to ‘manage’ its relationships with
stakeholders
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
39/51
3-3*Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
2takeholder #heory cont$!• 2takeholder #heory either branch! does not prescribe
what information should be disclosed% other than
indicating that the provision of information can be
useful for the continued operations of the entity
• +anagerial branch cont$!
* financial and social information is used to control conflicting
demands of various stakeholder groups
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
40/51
3-'0Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
:egitimacy #heory• 1rganisations continually seek to ensure that they
operate within the bounds and norms of society
• 1rganisations attempt to ensure their activities are
perceived to be legitimate• Bounds and norms change across time
• Based on a ‘social contract’ between society and the
organisation
• 9here this social contract is perceived as beingbreached then the organisation will take corrective
action% and this action might include disclosure
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
41/51
3-'1Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
:egitimacy #heory cont$!• 1rganisations must appear to consider the rights of
the public at large% not 3ust investors
• #o gain or maintain legitimacy% organisations might rely
on disclosure within their annual report
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
42/51
3-'2Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"ystes#oriented theories (cont.)
/nstitutional #heory
• &xplains why organisations within particular ‘fields’ tend to take
on similar characteristics and form
• +uch overlap with :egitimacy #heory and 2takeholder #heory
• #wo main dimensions to the theory * isomorphism and
decoupling• /somorphism
* coercive
* mimetic
* normative
• 'ecoupling * actual practices can be very different from formally sanctioned and
publicly pronounced processes and practices
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
43/51
3-'3Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theories e$plaining %hy regulation
is introduced
• Dust as there are theories to explain why particular
accounting disclosures are made "A#% :egitimacy
#heory% 2takeholder #heory!% or why particular
organisational forms exist institutional theory!% there
are also theories to explain why particularregulations for example% accounting regulations!
are developed$ 2uch theories include7
* "ublic interest theory
* 8apture theory * &conomic interest group theory
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
44/51
3-''Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is
introduced (cont.)
"ublic interest theory
• ,egulation put in place to benefit society as a whole
rather than vested interests
• ,egulatory body considered to represent the interests
of the society in which it operates% rather than theprivate interests of the regulators
• Assumes that government is a neutral arbiter
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
45/51
3-'"Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is
introduced (cont.)
8apture theory
• #he regulated seeks to take charge capture! the
regulator
• #hey seek to ensure rules subsequently released are
advantageous to the parties sub3ect to regulation
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
46/51
3-'(Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is
introduced (cont.)
&conomic interest group theory
• Assumes groups will form to protect particulareconomic interests
• (roups are often in conflict with each other and will
lobby government to put in place legislation that willbenefit themat the expense of others
• 0o notion of public interest inherent in the theory
• ,egulators and all other individuals! deemed to bemotivated by self-interest
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
47/51
3-'7Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
Theories e$plaining %hy regulation is
introduced (cont.)
&conomic interest group theory cont$!• #he regulator is not a neutral arbiter but is seen as an interest
group
• ,egulator is motivated to ensure re-election or maintenance of itsposition of power
• ,egulation serves the private interests of politically effectivegroups
• #hose groups with insufficient power will not be able to lobbyeffectively for regulation to protect their own interests
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
48/51
3-')Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"uary
• #he chapter describes various theories that relate to financial
accounting• 0o single accounting theory is universally accepted
• "ositive #heory of Accounting
* seeks to explain and predict accounting-related phenomena
* e$g$ study of capital market’s reaction to particular accounting
policies% what motivates managers to select a given method
of accounting% reasons for the existence of particular
accounting-based contracts
* relies upon a fundamental assumption that individual action
can be predicted on the basis that all action is driven by a
desire to maximise wealth a perspective often criticised byother researchers!
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
49/51
3-'*Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"uary (cont.)
0ormative theories of accounting
* prescribe how accounting should be practised * argue typically that a central role of accounting theory is
to provide prescriptionCinform about optimal accountingapproaches and why a particular approach is consideredoptimal
* examples7 8onceptual )ramework "ro3ect% current-costaccounting% exit-price accounting and deprival-valueaccounting
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
50/51
3-"0Copyright
2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd
"uary (cont.)
2ystems-based theories
• /nclude 2takeholder #heory% :egitimacy #heory% and /nstitutional
#heory
* see organisation as firmly embedded within a broader social
system
* organisation is considered to be affected by% and to affect% thesociety in which it operates
* accounting disclosures and particular organisational forms are
seen as a way to manage relations with particular groups
outside the organisationC organisational activities and
accounting disclosures are considered to be reactive tocommunity pressuresChow a firm operates and what it
reports must be determined upon consideration of various
stakeholder expectations
8/17/2019 deegan5ech
51/51
"uary (cont.)
#heories that seek to explain how regulation is
developed• 2ome theories suggest that regulation is introduced to
serve the public interest by regulators who work for thepublic good
• 1ther theories of regulation assume that the development
of regulation is driven by considerations of self-interest• 1verall% the selection of one theory over another will
depend on the views and expectations of the researcherin question
• 0o one theory of accounting can be described as a ‘best’theoryChowever% different theoretical perspectives can at
various times provide valuable insights in accountingissues