378
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT TO THE DEFENSE B ASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BRAC 2005 Volume III May 2005

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT TO THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BRAC 2005

Volume III

May 2005

Page 2: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

53

7.2 Military Value Assessment

Military Value analysis, as described in Section 6.6, provided a starting point for developing potential BRAC actions.

7.2.1 Military Value of Installations (MVI)

The MVI model ranked Army installations from 1-to-97, based on an analysis of 40 attributes across all installations. The MVI ranking was the first product of the MVA. The MVI results are listed below.

Table 7-1. MVI Ranking, 1st and 2nd Quartiles

Table 7-2. MVI Ranking, 3rd and 4th Quartiles

Ft Monmouth50Ft Riley13

Ft Meade49Tobyhanna AD37Anniston AD25Ft Knox12

Watervliet Arsenal48Ft Lee 36Ft McCoy24Ft Wainwright11

Picatinny Arsenal47Ft Leonard Wood35Ft Dix23White Sands MR10

Walter Reed AMC46Ft Gordon 34Ft AP Hill22Ft Benning9

Bluegrass AD45Ft Eustis33Ft Huachuca21Dugway PG8

Deseret Chem Depot44Crane AAP32Schofield Barracks20Ft Carson 7

Ft Sam Houston43Hawthorne AD31Ft Sill19Yuma PG6

Tooele AD 42Redstone Arsenal30Aberdeen PG18Ft Bragg5

Sierra AD 41Ft Richardson29Ft Irwin17Ft Stewart / HAAF4

Red River AD40Ft Rucker 28Ft Polk16Ft Hood3

Letterkenny AD39McAlester AAP27Ft Drum15Ft Lewis2

Ft Belvoir38Ft Jackson26Ft Campbell14Ft Bliss1

Second QuartileFirst Quartile

Ft Monmouth50Ft Riley13

Ft Meade49Tobyhanna AD37Anniston AD25Ft Knox12

Watervliet Arsenal48Ft Lee 36Ft McCoy24Ft Wainwright11

Picatinny Arsenal47Ft Leonard Wood35Ft Dix23White Sands MR10

Walter Reed AMC46Ft Gordon 34Ft AP Hill22Ft Benning9

Bluegrass AD45Ft Eustis33Ft Huachuca21Dugway PG8

Deseret Chem Depot44Crane AAP32Schofield Barracks20Ft Carson 7

Ft Sam Houston43Hawthorne AD31Ft Sill19Yuma PG6

Tooele AD 42Redstone Arsenal30Aberdeen PG18Ft Bragg5

Sierra AD 41Ft Richardson29Ft Irwin17Ft Stewart / HAAF4

Red River AD40Ft Rucker 28Ft Polk16Ft Hood3

Letterkenny AD39McAlester AAP27Ft Drum15Ft Lewis2

Ft Belvoir38Ft Jackson26Ft Campbell14Ft Bliss1

Second QuartileFirst Quartile

Lease - Rosslyn Complex88Newport Chem Depot63

Tripler AMC87Carlisle Barracks75Ft Leavenworth 62

Lease - HQ, ATEC86Detroit Arsenal74West Point61

Umatilla Chem Depot85Ft Hamilton73Mississippi AAP60

Lease - Army JAG School97Presidio Of Monterey84Adelphi Labs72Milan AAP59

Lease - Army JAG Agency96Holston AAP83Lone Star AAP71Charles E. Kelly Support 58

Lease - PEO STRICOM95Ft Buchanan82Iowa AAP70Soldier System Center57

Lease - ARPERCEN94Ft Shafter81Lake City AAP69Ft Detrick56

Lease - Hoffman Complex93Radford AAP80Ft Monroe68Pueblo Chem Depot55

Lease - Crystal City Complex92USAG Michigan79Kansas AAP67MOT Sunny Point54

Lease - ARO91Scranton AAP78Ft Myer66Rock Island Arsenal53

Lease - Bailey’s Crossroads90Corpus Christi AD77Ft McNair 65Ft Gillem52

Riverbank AAP89Lima Tank Plant 76Pine Bluff Arsenal64Ft McPherson51

Fourth QuartileThird Quartile

Lease - Rosslyn Complex88Newport Chem Depot63

Tripler AMC87Carlisle Barracks75Ft Leavenworth 62

Lease - HQ, ATEC86Detroit Arsenal74West Point61

Umatilla Chem Depot85Ft Hamilton73Mississippi AAP60

Lease - Army JAG School97Presidio Of Monterey84Adelphi Labs72Milan AAP59

Lease - Army JAG Agency96Holston AAP83Lone Star AAP71Charles E. Kelly Support 58

Lease - PEO STRICOM95Ft Buchanan82Iowa AAP70Soldier System Center57

Lease - ARPERCEN94Ft Shafter81Lake City AAP69Ft Detrick56

Lease - Hoffman Complex93Radford AAP80Ft Monroe68Pueblo Chem Depot55

Lease - Crystal City Complex92USAG Michigan79Kansas AAP67MOT Sunny Point54

Lease - ARO91Scranton AAP78Ft Myer66Rock Island Arsenal53

Lease - Bailey’s Crossroads90Corpus Christi AD77Ft McNair 65Ft Gillem52

Riverbank AAP89Lima Tank Plant 76Pine Bluff Arsenal64Ft McPherson51

Fourth QuartileThird Quartile

Page 3: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

B-9

2.4 Installation Value MVI is the ranking of Army installations from 1 to 97 in terms of value and their ability to support current and future Army requirements. The Army ranked installations in two contexts: one is an overall ranking, and the second is the relative ranking within a capability (see Annex 1 for capability rankings). Both rankings provided a means to evaluate the installation across the different Military Value criteria.

The rankings for each installation for the overall perspective follow in Table 6. For more detail on the rankings for each individual MV capability, see Annex 1. Installation Rank Overall

Score Installation Rank Overall Score

Ft Bliss 1 6.25 Redstone Arsenal 30 2.99 Milan AAP 59 1.92Ft Lewis 2 5.76 Hawthorne AD 31 2.97 Mississippi AAP 60 1.91Ft Hood 3 5.70 Crane AD 32 2.92 West Point 61 1.88Ft Stewart / Hunter AAF 4 5.48 Ft Eustis 33 2.91 Ft Leavenworth 62 1.85Ft Bragg 5 5.37 Ft Gordon 34 2.80 Newport Chem Depot 63 1.85Yuma PG 6 5.31 Ft Leonard Wood 35 2.79 Pine Buff Arsenal 64 1.84Ft Carson 7 5.26 Ft Lee 36 2.79 Ft Mc Nair 65 1.83Dugway PG 8 5.25 Tobyhanna AD 37 2.79 Ft Myer 66 1.81Ft Benning 9 5.24 Ft Belvoir 38 2.70 Kansas AAP 67 1.80White Sands MR 10 5.16 Letterkenny AD 39 2.69 Ft Monroe 68 1.79Ft Wainwright 11 5.09 Red River AD 40 2.61 Lake City AAP 69 1.78Ft Knox 12 4.91 Sierra AD 41 2.49 Iowa AAP 70 1.78Ft Riley 13 4.89 Tooele AD 42 2.48 Lone Star AAP 71 1.73Ft Campbell 14 4.81 Ft Sam Houston 43 2.42 Adelphi Labs 72 1.71Ft Drum 15 4.71 Deseret Chem Plant 44 2.36 Ft Hamilton 73 1.69Ft Polk 16 4.67 Bluegrass AD 45 2.34 Detroit Arsenal 74 1.63Ft Irwin 17 4.56 Walter Reed AMC 46 2.33 Carlisle 75 1.62Aberdeen PG 18 4.18 Picatinny Arsenal 47 2.33 Lima Tank Plant 76 1.60Ft Sill 19 4.03 Watervliet Arsenal 48 2.25 Corpus Christi ADA 77 1.59Schofield Barracks 20 3.95 Ft Meade 49 2.25 Scranton AAP 78 1.55Ft Huachuca 21 3.86 Ft Monmouth 49 2.25 USAG Selfridge 79 1.51Ft AP Hill 22 3.68 Ft McPherson 51 2.22 Radford AAP 80 1.51Ft Dix 23 3.47 Ft Gillem 52 2.20 Ft Shafter 81 1.48Ft Mc Coy 24 3.21 Rock Island Arsenal 53 2.14 Ft Buchanan 82 1.47Anniston AD 25 3.19 MOT Sunny Point 54 2.09 Holston AAP 83 1.44Ft Jackson 26 3.14 Pueblo Chem Depot 55 2.03 Presidio Of Monterey 84 1.35McAlester AAP 27 3.10 Ft Detrick 56 1.98 Umatilla Chem Depot 85 1.31Ft Rucker 28 3.07 Soldier Support Center 57 1.96 Tripler AAP 87 1.26Ft Richardson 29 3.00 Charles Kelley 58 1.93 Riverbank AAP 89 1.18

Lease - HQ, ATEC 86 1.27 Lease - Hoffman complex 92 1.11Lease - Rosslyn Complex 88 1.20 Lease - ARPERCEN 94 1.06Lease - Bailey’s Crossroads 90 1.16 Lease - PEO STRICOM 95 1.01Lease - Army Research 91 1.15 Lease - Army JAG Agency 96 0.94Lease - Crystal City Complex 92 1.11 Lease - Army JAG School 97 0.91

Table 6. Installation Ranking (MVI)

Page 4: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

UNCLASSIFIED

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO

Volume IV Of DoD Base Closure Report

(DON Analyses and Recommendations)

20 May 2005

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 5: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 6: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 7: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 8: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 9: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

WEAPONS STATIONS Weapons Stations have a primary mission of loading and unloading munitions on combatants and Combat Logistics Force ships. In support of this mission, short-term (less than six months) storage for munitions is needed. The Single Manager Conventional Ammunition, an Army command, performs long-term storage of munitions. The explosive nature of munitions means that facilities involved in their storage and handling must have certified Explosive Safety Quantity Distance arcs. These arcs represent the explosive hazards associated with the amounts of explosive on hand and impose strict limitations on operations within those arcs. Because of the explosive hazards entailed, weapons stations are separated geographically from operational homeports. In the recent past, large combat logistics force ships were homeported at appropriate weapons stations. Manning of these vessels is being switched to civilian crews, so, while the ships still need to be berthed at the weapons stations, there are no longer significant numbers of military crew members requiring the support offered in a homeport. The weapons stations’ mission is primarily performed by a relatively small civilian workforce. The Munitions and Armaments Subgroup of the Industrial Joint Cross-Service Group performed analyses on munitions maintenance and long-term (“wholesale”) storage, so those functions were not included in this analysis. The Department of the Navy analysis focused on the munitions storage and distribution function as performed at Naval Weapons Stations. This subcategory is composed of four Naval Weapons Stations along with their detachments, two Naval Magazines, the Naval Support Activity at Guam and the Blount Island Command, as follows: Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Detachment, Concord, California Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Detachment, Fallbrook, California Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Detachment, San Diego, California Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, California Blount Island, Jacksonville, Florida Naval Magazine, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey Weapons Station, Charleston, South Carolina Weapons Station, Yorktown, Virginia Naval Magazine, Indian Island, Washington (Port Hadlock) Naval Support Activity, Guam The Industrial Joint Cross-Service Group received direction to not include strategic weapons in their analysis. For the sake of consistency, this analysis does not include any strategic weapons facilities. Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Detachment, San Diego, CA was excluded at the direction of the Department of the Navy (DON) Analysis Group based on its small size, entirely military workforce, limited customer base (submarines based at Point Loma), and its having been considered an activity that would follow operational forces if they were relocated. Capacity Analysis With the Department of the Navy process, capacity analysis was conducted for both the throughput (loading and unloading) and short-term storage functions. A data call was sent to each Service to solicit their input for requirements for both throughput and storage capacity at the Weapons Stations. Requirements were provided as certified responses from Chief of Naval Operations, Ordnance Programs and Policy Branch, Marine Corps Installations & Logistics, and the Army and Air

HogeboCP
Highlight
Page 10: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Military Value Scores

Activity Mil Val EARLE 62.60 CONCORD 54.51 CHARLESTON 54.35 INDIAN_ISLAND 51.71 SEAL_BEACH 37.31 GUAM 35.59 BLOUNT ISLAND 32.40 YORKTOWN 31.08 PEARL_HARBOR 30.04 FALLBROOK 24.45

Page 11: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 12: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 13: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 14: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 15: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 16: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 17: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 18: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 19: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 20: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 21: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT TO THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION

Department of the Air Force

Analysis and Recommendations BRAC 2005

(Volume V, Part 1 of 2)

May 2005

Page 22: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Fighter MCI (except A-10s)

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 5.32 0.00 5.51 16.80 53.84Altus AFB 61.43 53.79 62.69 86.47 80.99Andersen AFB 51.26 37.23 67.15 62.55 0.00Andrews AFB 64.83 63.23 67.83 65.50 41.74Arnold AFS 35.94 30.95 33.00 57.62 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 50.22 53.44 50.22 37.74 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 34.47 27.19 37.72 47.20 63.61Barksdale AFB 61.49 43.76 71.35 97.29 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 42.02 38.75 48.16 30.19 47.17Beale AFB 58.10 48.35 67.63 67.18 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 39.24 37.95 38.69 37.65 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 50.86 46.69 56.24 40.75 78.40Bolling AFB 4.22 0.00 5.51 9.07 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 40.10 38.08 47.75 16.75 43.06Brooks City-Base 7.87 0.00 5.51 36.40 77.48Buckley AFB 49.82 43.25 55.99 53.35 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 40.79 41.33 42.88 25.52 57.07Cannon AFB 5 3 75.22 9.54 4.41 43.06 73.61Capital APT AGS 38.18 38.51 39.20 27.74 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

51.01 53.16 52.93 27.68 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 47.27 46.92 52.73 32.30 23.21Charleston AFB 64.94 59.12 66.51 82.49 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 38.49 38.36 42.07 13.38 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 40.13 38.00 41.00 39.11 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 4.87 0.00 5.51 11.89 55.61Columbus AFB 49.85 40.27 54.88 61.78 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

37.22 32.04 45.99 18.50 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 50.66 56.99 48.57 21.36 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 63.83 50.51 79.71 57.21 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 32.35 28.67 35.92 23.34 76.75Dobbins ARB 40.33 39.32 43.60 24.63 67.58Dover AFB 6 6 76.69 1.48 8.78 40.99 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 32.55 23.88 40.48 31.03 66.75Dyess AFB 58.96 40.51 76.07 68.18 77.64Edwards AFB 71.92 68.64 76.49 75.87 40.87Eglin AFB 81.40 74.55 83.97 100.00 90.39Eielson AFB 6 5 89.09 8.65 0.90 81.32 16.54Ellington Field AGS 45.39 37.87 50.14 56.27 61.20Ellsworth AFB 58.06 38.76 74.01 74.92 81.32Elmendorf AFB 58.35 37.02 78.71 84.41 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 43.40 50.03 39.16 23.11 73.39F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 38.63 35.33 48.26 16.07 29.52Fairchild AFB 60.32 43.09 74.35 77.86 73.99

58

Page 23: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Fighter MCI (except A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 46.55 44.27 49.30 38.02 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 38.63 39.63 36.31 31.14 88.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 34.49 32.75 37.92 16.99 79.17Francis E. Warren AFB 6.79 0.00 5.51 27.41 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 43.09 46.13 47.02 11.93 46.99Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 33.55 28.03 38.62 31.48 59.38Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 34.50 28.03 41.52 28.83 59.94Goodfellow AFB 8.00 0.00 5.51 36.40 82.66Grand Forks AFB 5 3 75.88 8.31 2.05 63.79 79.09Great Falls IAP AGS 37.85 31.45 44.04 35.35 62.23Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 34.40 34.13 33.86 32.89 54.24Grissom ARB 45.20 36.85 50.37 55.24 73.25Hancock Field AGS 42.03 35.71 45.60 50.23 66.32Hanscom AFB 37.29 40.55 40.84 10.54 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 39.79 41.24 43.04 12.19 69.50Hector IAP AGS 36.11 30.93 42.85 22.75 72.60Hickam AFB 53.47 41.69 68.03 60.32 1.12Hill AFB 68.02 56.88 76.08 83.39 77.82Holloman AFB 69.82 60.27 81.84 62.59 75.23Homestead ARS 59.17 52.11 70.75 44.96 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 37.45 36.53 40.99 15.84 82.24Hurlburt Field 77.43 76.75 84.64 48.05 87.18Indian Springs AFS 59.11 60.96 62.87 38.84 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 40.91 36.79 44.29 34.93 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 61.80 73.95 54.71 31.25 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 38.59 30.04 46.09 36.91 77.92Keesler AFB 52.07 59.95 47.57 26.19 85.30Key Field AGS 42.66 43.27 40.54 40.48 75.40Kirtland AFB 66.44 55.39 78.12 67.96 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 49.81 39.60 66.48 22.71 69.01Kulis AGS 40.76 41.31 48.96 12.36 8.01Lackland AFB 55.79 46.60 63.36 60.98 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 35.93 37.28 38.26 14.14 59.70Langley AFB 82.84 87.59 80.51 72.12 77.20Laughlin AFB 42.63 36.05 42.54 62.97 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 42.55 43.82 43.39 25.95 71.20Little Rock AFB 60.78 46.05 71.32 78.03 88.12Los Angeles AFB 3.08 0.00 5.51 1.94 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 36.56 35.55 37.78 25.76 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 41.83 52.60 39.02 10.87 14.06Luke AFB 69.06 65.65 79.48 41.64 68.92MacDill AFB 75.60 70.48 78.78 85.77 76.56Malmstrom AFB 7.50 0.00 5.51 36.40 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 29.24 26.31 31.69 21.36 74.01March ARB 64.84 68.31 71.06 27.89 45.41Martin State APT AGS 51.42 61.01 48.71 16.83 58.71

59

Page 24: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Fighter MCI (except A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 59.61 61.81 64.46 22.86 85.68McChord AFB 60.73 49.83 77.97 40.23 57.08McConnell AFB 56.47 47.44 68.32 44.00 75.83McEntire AGS 55.74 59.40 55.01 34.56 85.19McGee Tyson APT AGS 37.24 35.63 38.30 28.11 86.02McGuire AFB 57.02 44.52 70.22 64.69 37.26Memphis IAP AGS 42.44 41.35 43.82 33.43 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 30.25 18.73 41.24 33.25 47.69Minot AFB 56.64 39.53 71.88 67.90 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 44.05 46.92 50.38 11.68 15.79Moody AFB 70.80 57.19 82.55 79.47 91.37Mountain Home AFB 63.01 48.16 75.17 79.54 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 45.54 46.23 49.96 17.20 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 41.10 41.57 39.78 35.03 78.64Nellis AFB 68.73 60.85 82.32 54.77 43.94New Castle County Airport AGS 44.40 57.19 36.90 15.90 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 38.13 28.96 47.01 39.09 55.66Offutt AFB 47.16 43.03 50.37 46.36 73.20Onizuka AFS 3.72 0.00 5.51 10.08 16.85Otis AGB 42.83 28.15 56.00 55.91 42.04Patrick AFB 64.96 71.07 61.64 50.22 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 40.83 38.23 45.08 36.80 33.80Peterson AFB 46.82 44.97 50.41 36.55 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 52.30 62.83 45.30 28.91 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 34.04 22.60 45.14 31.81 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 30.86 22.60 37.30 32.36 69.59Pope AFB 65.86 58.95 77.74 43.27 86.08Portland IAP AGS 45.95 38.07 56.19 36.22 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 41.10 37.12 48.34 29.47 40.59Randolph AFB 48.70 44.96 49.93 53.43 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 51.34 61.17 47.23 24.11 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 55.34 66.15 52.13 13.98 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 42.74 39.57 50.05 19.92 71.11Robins AFB 59.13 47.51 66.23 76.00 87.45Rome Laboratory 5.55 0.00 5.51 16.80 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 41.25 38.89 42.16 38.20 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 50.13 60.83 42.03 29.21 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 57.80 65.20 55.63 26.00 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 33.59 33.31 33.66 27.95 60.05Schriever AFB 6.41 0.00 5.51 27.31 55.46Scott AFB 47.91 46.43 52.26 35.09 53.95Selfridge ANGB 48.07 35.89 63.74 40.50 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 83.24 77.95 89.63 80.45 85.03Shaw AFB 72.20 59.83 84.47 74.79 85.64Sheppard AFB 56.26 53.87 62.12 37.03 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 39.50 31.47 46.88 35.58 79.98

60

Page 25: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Fighter MCI (except A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 35.37 35.33 35.31 26.80 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 45.15 38.24 57.05 37.85 3.65Tinker AFB 58.47 49.29 62.76 75.96 85.80Toledo Express APT AGS 36.85 32.71 38.44 40.29 72.76Travis AFB 56.42 45.93 74.31 38.42 24.22Tucson IAP AGS 49.54 50.59 51.50 30.82 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 38.41 36.83 41.33 22.90 81.03Tyndall AFB 73.63 64.75 83.78 68.00 90.98United States Air Force Academy 5.22 0.00 5.51 13.92 61.68Vance AFB 45.39 42.69 51.09 23.57 87.75Vandenberg AFB 46.05 31.09 59.43 62.81 32.48W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 37.60 27.31 46.76 40.73 62.57Westover ARB 48.41 38.05 55.37 66.96 49.23Whiteman AFB 58.18 39.23 72.69 80.97 74.42Will Rogers World APT AGS 45.61 49.61 40.65 38.01 84.80Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

49.69 45.93 63.23 13.27 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 54.48 42.76 62.01 72.32 74.09Yeager APT AGS 28.68 26.99 27.78 27.03 81.12Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

28.84 19.56 35.83 31.21 73.97

61

Page 26: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Bomb Ier MC Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center 5.06 0.00 4.90 16.80 (ARPC)

53.84

Altus AFB 53.79 56.06 41.75 86.47 80.99Andersen AFB 40.98 28.05 52.58 62.55 0.00Andrews AFB 57.19 62.12 50.65 65.50 41.74Arnold AFS 34.53 36.99 22.91 57.62 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 39.38 48.73 29.29 37.74 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 31.45 29.03 28.42 47.20 63.61Barksdale AFB 60.74 42.61 70.82 97.29 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 29.69 33.02 24.81 30.19 47.17Beale AFB 53.29 41.70 63.42 67.18 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 41.19 53.21 26.47 37.65 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 39.70 46.08 30.03 40.75 78.40Bolling AFB 3.96 0.00 4.90 9.07 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 27.43 32.69 23.20 16.75 43.06Brooks City-Base 7.61 0.00 4.90 36.40 77.48Buckley AFB 30.16 36.49 16.11 53.35 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 29.72 36.12 21.97 25.52 57.07Cannon AFB 4 5 35.70 3.46 6.06 43.06 73.61Capital APT AGS 30.83 36.13 24.12 27.74 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint 41.01 50.68 31.59 27.68 Reserve

72.70

Channel Islands AGS 40.56 46.53 36.99 32.30 23.21Charleston AFB 61.01 64.68 50.88 82.49 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 46.03 64.45 31.32 13.38 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 25.20 32.14 11.54 39.11 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 4.61 0.00 4.90 11.89 55.61Columbus AFB 51.50 51.47 46.44 61.78 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field 26.74 30.39 22.59 18.50 AGS

61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 47.39 65.89 30.85 21.36 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 54.24 46.78 60.73 57.21 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 26.79 32.12 18.70 23.34 76.75Dobbins ARB 44.89 53.32 39.07 24.63 67.58Dover AFB 5 5 42.25 6.13 9.91 40.99 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 23.75 26.13 16.76 31.03 66.75Dyess AFB 56.70 51.20 58.78 68.18 77.64Edwards AFB 68.23 65.51 71.06 75.87 40.87Eglin AFB 70.16 62.88 69.82 100.00 90.39Eielson AFB 5 5 42.12 2.76 6.54 81.32 16.54Ellington Field AGS 33.67 36.97 22.90 56.27 61.20Ellsworth AFB 50.81 32.52 63.44 74.92 81.32Elmendorf AFB 44.49 32.65 50.14 84.41 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 41.26 54.12 29.44 23.11 73.39

64

Page 27: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Bomber MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 25.28 31.80 20.01 16.07 29.52Fairchild AFB 52.78 42.42 56.94 77.86 73.99Forbes Field AGS 43.47 46.30 39.62 38.02 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 35.67 44.09 24.25 31.14 88.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 25.12 31.09 17.21 16.99 79.17Francis E. Warren AFB 6.53 0.00 4.90 27.41 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 40.71 56.35 29.95 11.93 46.99Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 25.93 30.56 17.44 31.48 59.38Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 26.84 30.56 20.23 28.83 59.94Goodfellow AFB 7.74 0.00 4.90 36.40 82.66Grand Forks AFB 3 3 38.48 0.20 9.12 63.79 79.09Great Falls IAP AGS 25.48 28.14 17.92 35.35 62.23Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 28.26 34.06 19.13 32.89 54.24Grissom ARB 39.39 33.88 39.67 55.24 73.25Hancock Field AGS 30.97 30.67 24.52 50.23 66.32Hanscom AFB 23.06 30.80 17.34 10.54 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 39.87 44.67 39.41 12.19 69.50Hector IAP AGS 25.57 29.32 19.22 22.75 72.60Hickam AFB 39.79 29.71 48.33 60.32 1.12Hill AFB 58.73 45.50 66.30 83.39 77.82Holloman AFB 56.57 56.48 54.10 62.59 75.23Homestead ARS 51.44 46.37 58.47 44.96 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 28.72 33.66 23.13 15.84 82.24Hurlburt Field 56.79 63.33 49.80 48.05 87.18Indian Springs AFS 56.70 69.99 47.03 38.84 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 39.10 50.85 24.34 34.93 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 52.71 68.04 39.34 31.25 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 27.41 30.59 18.56 36.91 77.92Keesler AFB 40.31 57.31 22.17 26.19 85.30Key Field AGS 43.24 56.67 27.07 40.48 75.40Kirtland AFB 55.27 54.99 51.65 67.96 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 31.24 35.89 25.85 22.71 69.01Kulis AGS 26.28 36.53 19.38 12.36 8.01Lackland AFB 44.03 41.87 40.27 60.98 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 29.78 30.67 30.76 14.14 59.70Langley AFB 62.02 76.30 42.84 72.12 77.20Laughlin AFB 40.64 43.85 29.09 62.97 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 36.00 41.96 29.69 25.95 71.20Little Rock AFB 55.78 45.87 59.48 78.03 88.12Los Angeles AFB 2.82 0.00 4.90 1.94 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 25.96 34.56 13.33 25.76 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 29.31 38.40 24.60 10.87 14.06Luke AFB 52.87 57.37 49.63 41.64 68.92MacDill AFB 61.87 66.44 50.18 85.77 76.56Malmstrom AFB 7.24 0.00 4.90 36.40 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 22.42 27.42 14.02 21.36 74.01

65

Page 28: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Bomber MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

March ARB 58.79 64.12 61.12 27.89 45.41Martin State APT AGS 43.55 55.68 35.65 16.83 58.71Maxwell AFB 47.77 66.39 30.85 22.86 85.68McChord AFB 43.63 43.14 44.20 40.23 57.08McConnell AFB 56.28 52.88 61.83 44.00 75.83McEntire AGS 53.76 66.96 41.86 34.56 85.19McGee Tyson APT AGS 37.15 47.95 24.42 28.11 86.02McGuire AFB 47.61 38.54 54.18 64.69 37.26Memphis IAP AGS 35.01 45.52 21.31 33.43 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 22.84 20.07 21.91 33.25 47.69Minot AFB 45.72 31.04 54.97 67.90 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 31.14 40.00 26.93 11.68 15.79Moody AFB 62.36 69.98 48.06 79.47 91.37Mountain Home AFB 58.44 49.99 62.13 79.54 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 35.59 44.81 27.56 17.20 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 35.06 40.91 25.95 35.03 78.64Nellis AFB 68.33 70.74 70.39 54.77 43.94New Castle County Airport AGS 36.34 49.80 25.67 15.90 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 25.07 25.77 19.09 39.09 55.66Offutt AFB 41.43 40.26 39.61 46.36 73.20Onizuka AFS 3.46 0.00 4.90 10.08 16.85Otis AGB 28.25 23.68 25.82 55.91 42.04Patrick AFB 50.47 63.35 35.27 50.22 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 27.84 33.00 19.58 36.80 33.80Peterson AFB 30.31 39.00 17.26 36.55 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 41.64 56.60 26.51 28.91 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 35.70 31.56 39.20 31.81 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 32.61 31.56 31.58 32.36 69.59Pope AFB 66.54 75.85 60.66 43.27 86.08Portland IAP AGS 33.40 42.65 20.87 36.22 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 24.32 28.94 16.98 29.47 40.59Randolph AFB 35.93 41.00 23.55 53.43 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 39.43 52.59 28.06 24.11 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 51.00 72.78 34.31 13.98 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 34.52 33.03 37.50 19.92 71.11Robins AFB 66.62 62.78 67.36 76.00 87.45Rome Laboratory 5.29 0.00 4.90 16.80 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 33.71 40.09 22.68 38.20 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 36.05 46.05 24.49 29.21 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 49.22 66.38 33.66 26.00 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 27.35 35.02 16.72 27.95 60.05Schriever AFB 6.15 0.00 4.90 27.31 55.46Scott AFB 33.83 40.51 24.91 35.09 53.95Selfridge ANGB 33.86 31.60 34.23 40.50 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 78.41 80.55 75.14 80.45 85.03Shaw AFB 62.97 67.99 53.19 74.79 85.64

66

Page 29: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Bomber MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Sheppard AFB 47.32 53.91 40.52 37.03 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 31.00 34.88 22.65 35.58 79.98Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 27.16 29.66 21.80 26.80 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 29.57 36.84 21.05 37.85 3.65Tinker AFB 60.40 65.22 49.77 75.96 85.80Toledo Express APT AGS 28.79 31.04 20.86 40.29 72.76Travis AFB 46.72 39.57 58.00 38.42 24.22Tucson IAP AGS 38.53 46.72 29.26 30.82 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 41.30 52.04 31.42 22.90 81.03Tyndall AFB 60.80 67.54 49.79 68.00 90.98United States Air Force Academy 4.96 0.00 4.90 13.92 61.68Vance AFB 38.35 55.09 20.38 23.57 87.75Vandenberg AFB 43.19 38.20 44.64 62.81 32.48W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 27.47 27.89 21.72 40.73 62.57Westover ARB 38.40 32.95 36.88 66.96 49.23Whiteman AFB 56.03 40.12 66.54 80.97 74.42Will Rogers World APT AGS 40.43 55.77 21.34 38.01 84.80Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

35.58 41.57 34.08 13.27 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 46.06 34.29 51.12 72.32 74.09Yeager APT AGS 31.91 39.61 21.58 27.03 81.12Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

24.84 27.24 17.68 31.21 73.97

67

Page 30: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Airli I ft MC

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 4.69 0.00 4.00 16.80 53.84 Altus AFB 71.30 64.97 73.95 87.04 80.99 Andersen AFB 49.64 30.79 70.34 62.87 0.00 Andrews AFB 62.05 54.38 70.40 67.79 41.74 Arnold AFS 34.22 44.49 13.90 57.35 89.61 Atlantic City IAP AGS 45.55 38.81 31.54 37.39 41.33 Bangor IAP AGS 43.83 43.24 42.24 48.22 63.61 Barksdale AFB 72.43 52.92 87.48 97.70 80.79 Barnes MPT AGS 37.75 43.93 31.39 33.33 47.17 Beale AFB 54.63 38.40 70.78 65.31 42.78 Birmingham IAP AGS 50.93 53.99 48.35 40.70 77.96 Boise Air Terminal AGS 47.32 46.89 46.65 44.25 78.40 Bolling AFB 3.59 0.00 4.00 9.07 40.62 Bradley IAP AGS 37.83 43.58 36.03 17.46 43.06 Brooks City-Base 7.24 0.00 4.00 36.40 77.48 Buckley AFB 54.62 56.16 52.45 56.83 53.78 Burlington IAP AGS 51.69 42.29 34.88 26.00 57.07 Cannon AFB 45.43 45.45 43.94 44.40 73.61 Capital APT AGS 36.96 34.53 32.03 28.06 57.09 Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

50.57 53.62 50.30 32.08 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 41.92 44.04 42.05 36.32 23.21 Charleston AFB 74.09 64.57 83.15 79.91 75.49 Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 70.45 56.27 49.46 12.94 81.48 Cheyenne APT AGS 46.92 37.65 24.30 42.72 68.70 Cheyenne Mountain AFS 0.00 4.24 4.00 11.89 55.61 Columbus AFB 57.51 53.22 58.08 65.55 94.97 Dane County Regional - Truax Field 42.35 AGS

38.59 37.71 19.21 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 49.46 69.74 31.75 20.60 85.51 Davis-Monthan AFB 55.89 45.11 66.00 59.49 71.89 Des Moines IAP AGS 33.54 35.70 30.80 24.21 76.75 Dobbins ARB 51.35 46.50 44.38 27.71 67.58 Dover AFB 56.06 48.75 66.73 43.17 64.93 Duluth IAP AGS 30.43 35.49 21.71 34.16 66.75 Dyess AFB 65.95 54.87 76.82 68.94 77.64 Edwards AFB 65.53 55.18 75.19 79.33 40.87 Eglin AFB 79.43 72.45 81.55 100.00 90.39 Eielson AFB 67.34 61.25 73.03 84.43 16.54 Ellington Field AGS 51.65 47.25 53.91 60.12 61.20 Ellsworth AFB 59.40 42.43 72.78 76.53 81.32 Elmendorf AFB 51.60 29.97 70.05 85.17 8.86 Ewvra Sheppard AGS 33.11 47.05 17.83 22.37 73.39 F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 30.21 41.65 20.77 16.92 29.52 Fairchild AFB 64.22 52.54 72.85 79.72 73.99

70

Page 31: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Airlift MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 51.93 43.85 61.74 42.08 77.32 Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 42.58 52.08 31.91 31.62 88.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 48.09 42.32 39.65 17.72 79.17 Francis E. Warren AFB 6.16 0.00 4.00 27.41 70.53 Fresno Air Terminal AGS 46.12 32.77 21.98 12.56 46.99 Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 41.98 40.89 43.76 35.25 59.38 Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 40.89 33.77 24.50 32.87 59.94 Goodfellow AFB 0.00 7.37 4.00 36.40 82.66 Grand Forks AFB 50.53 35.28 62.52 63.66 79.09 Great Falls IAP AGS 35.51 35.71 32.68 39.59 62.23 Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 35.77 34.56 32.28 33.46 54.24 Grissom ARB 55.66 42.59 68.46 58.32 73.25 Hancock Field AGS 36.20 44.61 21.04 52.90 66.32 Hanscom AFB 29.65 42.58 20.17 10.54 25.42 Harrisburg IAP AGS 42.89 47.01 44.21 11.84 69.50 Hector IAP AGS 30.78 38.72 21.49 22.30 72.60 Hickam AFB 49.77 34.58 66.93 60.50 1.12 Hill AFB 58.83 45.27 66.57 84.33 77.82 Holloman AFB 65.78 61.34 70.94 62.43 75.23 Homestead ARS 48.15 37.64 59.36 48.73 53.65 Hulman Regional APT AGS 38.63 42.75 36.72 16.55 82.24 Hurlburt Field 69.61 75.12 67.11 50.15 87.18 Indian Springs AFS 45.80 60.77 31.08 38.50 43.94 Jackson IAP AGS 44.15 47.37 39.33 39.24 84.66 Jacksonville IAP AGS 45.79 53.89 38.47 30.75 77.87 Joe Foss Field AGS 39.59 36.23 40.62 41.13 77.92 Keesler AFB 46.80 64.62 29.62 26.47 85.30 Key Field AGS 56.39 64.14 50.02 42.43 75.40 Kirtland AFB 55.47 49.12 58.01 70.63 69.56 Klamath Falls IAP AGS 35.18 38.18 32.91 22.29 69.01 Kulis AGS 38.93 43.14 42.67 11.81 8.01 Lackland AFB 47.44 45.03 44.29 63.85 78.33 Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 32.04 29.73 37.40 13.46 59.70 Langley AFB 56.57 53.37 54.97 72.81 77.20 Laughlin AFB 46.13 46.75 39.38 61.81 84.09 Lincoln MAP AGS 43.08 45.83 42.39 26.26 71.20 Little Rock AFB 63.25 49.25 73.05 80.66 88.12 Los Angeles AFB 2.45 0.00 4.00 1.94 23.81 Louisville IAP AGS 44.66 49.33 41.32 28.67 78.10 Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 36.78 42.16 38.47 10.74 14.06 Luke AFB 52.17 50.43 55.68 41.35 68.92 MacDill AFB 60.12 47.48 66.41 88.14 76.56 Malmstrom AFB 6.87 0.00 4.00 36.40 62.67 Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 37.28 42.33 33.50 20.60 74.01 March ARB 59.86 56.53 71.33 31.15 45.41 Martin State APT AGS 30.37 50.13 10.15 16.26 58.71

71

Page 32: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Airlift MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 59.90 70.78 55.31 22.48 85.68 McChord AFB 57.95 49.64 71.78 38.95 57.08 McConnell AFB 54.65 45.85 65.92 43.00 75.83 McEntire AGS 59.35 71.70 49.85 35.48 85.19 McGee Tyson APT AGS 48.32 47.96 51.87 25.79 86.02 McGuire AFB 51.80 39.42 62.51 67.95 37.26 Memphis IAP AGS 48.01 50.94 45.72 37.17 75.57 Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 41.52 32.19 52.63 36.80 47.69 Minot AFB 54.34 39.70 65.42 70.91 73.42 Moffett Federal Field AGS 33.14 40.10 31.66 11.59 15.79 Moody AFB 51.72 52.29 41.64 81.05 91.37 Mountain Home AFB 59.77 46.58 68.64 81.35 68.58 NAS New Orleans ARS 41.65 46.93 39.81 17.20 72.63 Nashville IAP AGS 39.77 48.71 27.61 39.33 78.64 Nellis AFB 63.95 59.85 72.31 53.08 43.94 New Castle County Airport AGS 36.96 48.83 28.33 15.48 47.53 Niagara Falls IAP ARS 40.03 35.85 43.28 41.92 55.66 Offutt AFB 47.07 43.55 49.10 48.25 73.20 Onizuka AFS 3.09 0.00 4.00 10.08 16.85 Otis AGB 38.95 36.97 36.90 55.82 42.04 Patrick AFB 42.23 47.00 32.91 52.75 66.83 Pease International Trade Port AGS 46.65 43.72 52.48 39.09 33.80 Peterson AFB 57.20 58.40 59.78 39.75 61.91 Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 48.12 53.14 45.21 32.12 68.42 Pittsburgh IAP AGS 44.85 36.28 55.13 35.53 69.30 Pittsburgh IAP ARS 39.64 36.28 42.44 36.01 69.59 Pope AFB 69.99 71.21 73.40 46.19 86.08 Portland IAP AGS 42.32 46.23 37.58 39.48 60.13 Quonset State APT AGS 35.29 40.77 29.32 33.62 40.59 Randolph AFB 49.20 43.66 51.76 56.76 78.51 Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 40.51 44.93 39.29 23.44 47.47 Richmond IAP AGS 42.64 53.44 35.69 13.67 75.18 Rickenbacker IAP AGS 50.04 45.27 61.23 20.26 71.11 Robins AFB 63.89 52.22 71.87 78.50 87.45 Rome Laboratory 4.92 0.00 4.00 16.80 63.10 Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 38.22 40.01 32.73 41.97 81.65 Salt Lake City IAP AGS 43.99 45.47 43.47 32.41 71.72 Savannah IAP AGS 45.10 52.68 38.84 26.30 84.65 Schenectady County APT AGS 37.72 49.21 25.33 30.66 60.05 Schriever AFB 5.78 0.00 4.00 27.31 55.46 Scott AFB 44.55 39.62 52.04 33.65 53.95 Selfridge ANGB 47.27 44.66 52.56 38.56 42.51 Seymour Johnson AFB 78.03 71.25 83.82 83.34 85.03 Shaw AFB 67.70 71.86 59.50 78.12 85.64 Sheppard AFB 55.21 60.81 52.33 35.24 80.04 Sioux Gateway APT AGS 39.30 39.33 37.14 38.03 79.98

72

Page 33: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Airlift MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 33.54 41.59 23.23 29.78 71.74 Stewart IAP AGS 45.53 45.03 49.72 40.99 3.65 Tinker AFB 68.62 55.20 80.62 76.23 85.80 Toledo Express APT AGS 41.45 44.03 36.46 42.51 72.76 Travis AFB 53.86 41.24 72.89 40.31 24.22 Tucson IAP AGS 41.92 45.19 39.16 30.57 72.70 Tulsa IAP AGS 43.20 49.40 38.74 23.72 81.03 Tyndall AFB 61.75 68.65 50.88 67.84 90.98 United States Air Force Academy 4.59 0.00 4.00 13.92 61.68 Vance AFB 43.45 55.12 32.89 22.51 87.75 Vandenberg AFB 44.16 40.15 43.97 66.26 32.48 W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 39.22 38.19 37.74 44.28 62.57 Westover ARB 52.00 42.80 58.47 68.13 49.23 Whiteman AFB 57.82 39.47 71.25 82.33 74.42 Will Rogers World APT AGS 47.79 56.31 37.47 42.22 84.80 Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

35.85 43.92 32.22 12.92 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 54.27 44.62 58.95 74.34 74.09 Yeager APT AGS 31.90 40.64 19.79 29.70 81.12 Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

40.09 40.95 38.26 35.23 73.97

73

Page 34: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Tank CI er M

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 0.004.78 5.00 13.51 53.84Altus AFB 83.40 80.54 85.88 86.92 80.99Andersen AFB 54.84 29.24 83.17 68.66 0.00Andrews AFB 68.00 58.11 81.68 63.29 41.74Arnold AFS 42.15 70.13 7.00 47.37 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 23.5130.34 36.93 31.71 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 42.68 40.25 42.64 48.67 63.61Barksdale AFB 84.14 72.18 94.69 96.22 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 39.35 48.39 31.90 26.65 47.17Beale AFB 79.37 84.02 80.76 61.31 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 57.30 68.27 48.57 37.93 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 70.84 90.42 56.46 38.64 78.40Bolling AFB 3.83 0.00 5.00 7.29 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 48.5540.49 37.40 15.61 43.06Brooks City-Base 6.95 0.00 5.00 29.25 77.48Buckley AFB 62.71 93.34 32.62 48.89 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 41.20 46.06 39.08 23.55 57.07Cannon AFB 5 78.23 3 46.18 3.60 4.10 73.61Capital APT AGS 51.84 73.35 33.93 25.93 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

57.81 74.31 46.62 24.62 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 56.85 78.66 41.23 29.84 23.21Charleston AFB 70.87 59.14 81.06 81.35 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 63.4248.25 38.04 12.47 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 56.81 91.56 22.36 36.87 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 0.004.43 5.00 9.56 55.61Columbus AFB 68.31 70.51 67.62 54.48 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

50.41 65.86 40.65 16.99 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 44.06 65.89 23.12 20.17 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 79.05 80.31 84.66 51.76 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 53.07 74.03 36.32 20.30 76.75Dobbins ARB 54.14 66.47 47.28 22.46 67.58Dover AFB 6 55.42 72.73 5.22 44.02 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 40.43 56.14 24.58 27.40 66.75Dyess AFB 78.56 74.37 86.18 66.52 77.64Edwards AFB 81.12 84.75 82.92 67.02 40.87Eglin AFB 75.28 60.95 184.29 00.00 90.39Eielson AFB 5 32.56 87.97 5.07 72.75 16.54Ellington Field AGS 50.71 63.39 36.23 49.75 61.20Ellsworth AFB 83.73 79.40 91.15 73.51 81.32Elmendorf AFB 56.87 28.53 85.70 79.56 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 59.2742.59 27.36 21.46 73.39F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 49.6034.63 23.18 14.50 29.52Fairchild AFB 77.09 72.66 82.72 74.88 73.99

76

Page 35: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Tanker MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 66.07 79.78 57.88 34.24 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 55.12 78.51 833.69 28.06 8.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 52.43 67.45 43.01 15.69 79.17Francis E. Warren AFB 6.04 0.00 5.00 22.03 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 51.39 85.52 23.31 12.05 46.99Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 54.00 65.19 47.02 30.15 59.38Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 49.94 65.19 37.98 26.93 59.94Goodfellow AFB 0.007.08 5.00 29.25 82.66Grand Forks AFB 6 56.57 73.52 1.92 56.70 79.09Great Falls IAP AGS 55.65 74.92 39.74 31.40 62.23Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 72.0353.49 38.78 29.13 54.24Grissom ARB 68.23 69.06 70.93 51.91 73.25Hancock Field AGS 39.44 51.58 23.11 44.63 66.32Hanscom AFB 32.23 45.77 23.36 8.47 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 50.31 56.64 51.56 11.19 69.50Hector IAP AGS 46.78 59.60 37.43 20.05 72.60Hickam AFB 53.88 27.64 82.88 67.43 1.12Hill AFB 88.93 99.52 80.45 78.08 77.82Holloman AFB 78.13 81.36 80.08 55.87 75.23Homestead ARS 57.34 44.92 75.28 40.97 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 51.48 71.51 36.24 14.88 82.24Hurlburt Field 60.43 61.59 61.23 45.12 87.18Indian Springs AFS 58.33 94.54 25.27 32.54 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 53.23 69.01 39.25 30.78 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 48.21 56.00 42.90 27.04 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 55.36 72.32 40.66 32.71 77.92Keesler AFB 43.02 63.09 22.60 24.86 85.30Key Field AGS 52.83 67.84 38.01 39.62 75.40Kirtland AFB 74.73 89.43 62.56 58.87 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 52.43 82.68 25.73 19.92 69.01Kulis AGS 36.28 33.64 46.74 12.09 8.01Lackland AFB 58.30 63.64 51.42 57.33 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 51.61 65.57 44.73 14.02 59.70Langley AFB 63.03 57.36 65.58 74.88 77.20Laughlin AFB 55.16 63.93 43.69 55.16 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 61.82 78.42 51.82 24.57 71.20Little Rock AFB 79.98 76.28 85.52 72.03 88.12Los Angeles AFB 2.84 0.00 5.00 1.56 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 54.72 70.69 43.00 24.00 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 30.75 25.25 43.01 9.27 14.06Luke AFB 69.18 86.37 57.31 39.54 68.92MacDill AFB 65.67 51.49 77.47 79.24 76.56Malmstrom AFB 6.58 0.00 5.00 29.25 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 48.06 64.19 35.32 20.17 74.01March ARB 77.38 81.93 85.82 29.27 45.41Martin State APT AGS 32.26 57.08 7.10 15.79 58.71

77

Page 36: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Tanker MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 52.43 66.01 43.23 19.87 85.68McChord AFB 69.09 68.00 77.48 42.30 57.08McConnell AFB 77.69 82.94 81.22 39.27 75.83McEntire AGS 48.51 61.71 36.33 29.05 85.19McGee Tyson APT AGS 55.32 67.74 45.40 31.72 86.02McGuire AFB 57.57 48.27 68.82 58.82 37.26Memphis IAP AGS 59.92 74.51 49.58 31.81 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 51.23 48.72 58.78 32.40 47.69Minot AFB 62.74 58.49 66.86 62.42 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 53.24 79.61 36.78 9.71 15.79Moody AFB 54.03 59.01 41.86 72.35 91.37Mountain Home AFB 86.64 92.21 84.00 76.49 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 47.42 61.63 38.25 13.82 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 54.26 71.02 39.82 30.93 78.64Nellis AFB 77.70 94.53 66.40 55.55 43.94New Castle County Airport AGS 41.41 55.29 32.16 14.43 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 44.63 54.98 33.64 39.93 55.66Offutt AFB 66.72 77.57 59.64 44.57 73.20Onizuka AFS 3.31 0.00 5.00 8.11 16.85Otis AGB 43.12 45.26 39.11 50.17 42.04Patrick AFB 41.56 50.29 28.31 50.05 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 50.62 44.47 62.12 35.33 33.80Peterson AFB 75.05 93.46 64.75 36.44 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 65.27 86.26 50.26 30.23 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 54.44 61.23 51.76 30.56 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 54.31 61.23 51.25 31.29 69.59Pope AFB 62.76 60.63 68.47 42.95 86.08Portland IAP AGS 55.44 72.49 40.93 35.96 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 39.40 46.74 34.19 27.04 40.59Randolph AFB 64.12 64.12 66.76 49.53 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 61.85 89.09 40.95 26.94 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 45.32 59.11 36.18 12.44 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 61.40 65.89 65.91 19.60 71.11Robins AFB 75.60 63.00 89.98 70.89 87.45Rome Laboratory 5.01 0.00 5.00 13.51 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 55.88 78.12 34.56 35.55 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 71.78 99.99 51.62 25.67 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 47.07 59.00 36.99 24.63 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 34.42 49.21 18.36 26.56 60.05Schriever AFB 5.66 0.00 5.00 21.94 55.46Scott AFB 65.12 74.93 61.26 38.75 53.95Selfridge ANGB 58.24 61.13 59.15 45.09 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 71.70 59.11 84.52 72.95 85.03Shaw AFB 55.08 61.15 43.70 66.66 85.64Sheppard AFB 67.40 78.60 61.59 36.82 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 56.36 75.00 39.74 33.71 79.98

78

Page 37: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Tanker MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 44.70 67.12 23.06 24.55 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 50.69 51.20 56.08 37.76 3.65Tinker AFB 84.08 80.89 88.58 79.63 85.80Toledo Express APT AGS 51.84 64.39 39.90 38.40 72.76Travis AFB 74.99 81.40 79.81 38.16 24.22Tucson IAP AGS 60.48 80.11 45.15 30.67 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 58.73 80.13 42.97 20.12 81.03Tyndall AFB 55.38 59.52 47.49 60.22 90.98United States Air Force Academy 4.74 0.00 5.00 11.19 61.68Vance AFB 58.04 82.76 37.28 23.09 87.75Vandenberg AFB 54.38 77.04 30.06 56.57 32.48W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 50.93 64.59 38.12 38.40 62.57Westover ARB 59.47 48.01 70.56 68.84 49.23Whiteman AFB 81.45 78.08 86.09 79.37 74.42Will Rogers World APT AGS 60.37 80.92 42.56 33.68 84.80Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

40.94 54.02 33.48 12.05 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 71.83 67.62 76.85 69.80 74.09Yeager APT AGS 41.01 64.84 15.79 25.96 81.12Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

47.72 60.63 36.35 28.94 73.97

79

Page 38: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

SOF / CSAR MCI (includes A-10s)

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 4.52 0.00 3.60 16.80 53.84Altus AFB 54.09 46.12 53.24 87.60 80.99Andersen AFB 47.13 40.89 53.02 63.18 0.00Andrews AFB 55.23 51.37 63.10 43.68 41.74Arnold AFS 30.21 31.71 18.48 57.08 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 41.94 45.33 39.42 37.04 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 31.77 27.59 35.03 29.45 63.61Barksdale AFB 49.81 38.36 55.36 71.70 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 35.50 36.18 38.57 16.67 47.17Beale AFB 48.27 40.24 53.82 63.45 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 42.46 40.60 42.04 43.75 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 41.35 33.24 46.55 47.75 78.40Bolling AFB 3.42 0.00 3.60 9.07 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 35.40 35.73 40.29 11.56 43.06Brooks City-Base 7.07 0.00 3.60 36.40 77.48Buckley AFB 37.52 33.35 42.04 33.90 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 34.09 36.45 33.50 19.87 57.07Cannon AFB 4 3 51.03 2.28 2.41 25.93 73.61Capital APT AGS 32.43 34.87 30.79 21.79 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

39.87 38.37 40.37 36.48 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 37.68 36.93 45.12 13.93 23.21Charleston AFB 56.48 50.62 58.39 70.73 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 40.12 42.18 42.01 12.50 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 29.51 35.71 22.58 19.94 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 4.07 0.00 3.60 11.89 55.61Columbus AFB 46.47 40.99 50.48 42.92 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

30.35 31.18 31.67 13.32 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 46.01 54.50 40.54 19.84 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 52.45 42.17 65.19 41.96 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 29.46 30.02 28.63 18.46 76.75Dobbins ARB 34.84 32.25 41.46 10.98 67.58Dover AFB 5 4 50.61 8.58 9.61 18.95 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 24.68 23.50 25.17 17.49 66.75Dyess AFB 53.14 44.86 61.61 49.91 77.64Edwards AFB 62.39 53.64 68.48 82.79 40.87Eglin AFB 77.03 75.95 78.25 73.60 90.39Eielson AFB 5 4 53.27 3.20 8.42 87.54 16.54Ellington Field AGS 41.22 36.06 46.60 37.56 61.20Ellsworth AFB 43.91 28.07 50.98 78.14 81.32Elmendorf AFB 51.21 43.01 59.27 66.14 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 33.85 42.89 24.41 21.64 73.39F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 27.93 32.55 26.75 11.16 29.52Fairchild AFB 45.83 29.63 53.46 81.59 73.99

82

Page 39: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

SOF / CSAR MCI (includes A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 40.95 35.73 43.31 46.14 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 42.12 50.04 34.53 25.50 88.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 79.1730.63 27.81 35.34 11.85 Francis E. Warren AFB 5.99 0.00 3.60 27.41 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 46.9938.23 44.66 38.22 6.58 Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 59.3832.25 29.87 31.65 39.01 Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 30.80 29.87 28.61 36.90 59.94Goodfellow AFB 82.667.20 0.00 3.60 36.40 Grand Forks AFB 4 3 5 79.093.75 3.14 0.22 56.93 Great Falls IAP AGS 62.2327.23 27.10 27.61 17.43 Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 30.64 32.05 28.44 27.43 54.24Grissom ARB 39.37 30.99 41.30 61.40 73.25Hancock Field AGS 30.51 30.89 26.66 35.76 66.32Hanscom AFB 27.91 32.76 26.86 10.54 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 39.39 42.14 41.25 11.49 69.50Hector IAP AGS 27.74 31.75 21.98 21.85 72.60Hickam AFB 43.95 39.25 47.69 60.68 1.12Hill AFB 54.44 44.20 61.71 65.46 77.82Holloman AFB 60.87 54.81 67.98 55.66 75.23Homestead ARS 50.71 42.01 59.76 52.49 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 29.48 30.78 29.38 10.65 82.24Hurlburt Field 77.84 82.86 82.65 32.44 87.18Indian Springs AFS 44.82 41.82 49.78 38.16 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 37.40 36.84 33.67 43.55 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 55.66 57.16 58.77 30.26 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 30.70 28.28 33.35 18.95 77.92Keesler AFB 43.21 54.41 33.81 20.15 85.30Key Field AGS 41.96 38.23 48.25 24.58 75.40Kirtland AFB 50.63 38.65 62.07 53.49 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 32.52 29.07 36.69 21.87 69.01Kulis AGS 41.92 46.09 46.72 11.26 8.01Lackland AFB 45.78 37.88 47.55 66.73 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 30.36 29.81 33.45 12.78 59.70Langley AFB 69.03 65.24 71.66 73.50 77.20Laughlin AFB 39.70 34.52 37.72 60.65 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 32.07 33.20 31.38 19.97 71.20Little Rock AFB 53.81 45.76 59.92 56.89 88.12Los Angeles AFB 2.28 0.00 3.60 1.94 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 32.31 35.26 31.22 11.79 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 38.58 48.06 36.29 10.61 14.06Luke AFB 53.14 45.94 64.67 34.45 68.92MacDill AFB 61.04 52.39 62.60 90.51 76.56Malmstrom AFB 6.70 0.00 3.60 36.40 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 23.19 22.42 21.81 19.84 74.01March ARB 54.41 47.94 66.93 34.41 45.41Martin State APT AGS 39.45 48.22 34.28 15.68 58.71

83

Page 40: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

SOF / CSAR MCI (includes A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 53.73 57.07 55.74 22.10 85.68McChord AFB 47.80 39.58 60.37 31.06 57.08McConnell AFB 45.17 35.11 55.22 42.00 75.83McEntire AGS 50.55 52.17 51.67 29.80 85.19McGee Tyson APT AGS 35.93 34.30 37.71 23.46 86.02McGuire AFB 46.24 37.55 50.40 71.21 37.26Memphis IAP AGS 34.29 37.94 32.53 14.51 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 32.46 24.26 38.72 40.36 47.69Minot AFB 45.12 31.63 51.43 73.91 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 35.10 38.39 38.31 11.51 15.79Moody AFB 60.72 57.38 62.09 62.84 91.37Mountain Home AFB 49.68 36.97 60.91 56.75 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 43.96 42.62 50.14 17.20 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 35.61 40.32 32.22 17.22 78.64Nellis AFB 53.81 43.63 67.85 44.79 43.94New Castle County Airport AGS 34.12 44.15 26.76 15.06 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 33.78 27.38 36.92 44.75 55.66Offutt AFB 35.86 34.02 36.98 30.34 73.20Onizuka AFS 2.92 0.00 3.60 10.08 16.85Otis AGB 34.97 25.56 41.56 49.14 42.04Patrick AFB 51.88 51.19 50.92 55.28 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 33.89 31.70 39.27 21.58 33.80Peterson AFB 44.13 42.46 45.17 42.96 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 38.54 42.77 39.20 8.94 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 36.75 27.36 44.58 39.25 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 31.37 27.36 37.86 13.26 69.59Pope AFB 78.74 81.48 82.42 49.11 86.08Portland IAP AGS 36.36 38.77 37.10 16.33 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 28.81 31.44 29.40 11.36 40.59Randolph AFB 42.07 35.99 42.26 60.08 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 35.24 39.61 34.25 16.17 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 51.80 58.04 52.73 13.36 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 34.00 30.11 40.88 14.00 71.11Robins AFB 61.64 48.89 69.55 81.00 87.45Rome Laboratory 4.75 0.00 3.60 16.80 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 37.76 37.06 40.34 19.33 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 39.97 44.61 38.75 15.80 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 49.54 57.00 46.26 19.99 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 27.74 36.27 19.77 13.57 60.05Schriever AFB 5.61 0.00 3.60 27.31 55.46Scott AFB 39.96 37.70 45.08 25.62 53.95Selfridge ANGB 42.06 44.13 42.66 30.02 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 71.86 61.68 78.88 86.22 85.03Shaw AFB 58.51 53.04 63.77 55.05 85.64Sheppard AFB 45.70 46.84 45.32 33.44 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 28.98 29.76 27.03 20.68 79.98

84

Page 41: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

SOF / CSAR MCI (includes A-10s) Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 24.54 24.06 25.02 12.97 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 39.37 34.65 45.61 44.12 3.65Tinker AFB 42.61 36.73 44.70 50.10 85.80Toledo Express APT AGS 31.16 30.20 31.23 24.93 72.76Travis AFB 42.79 39.27 52.73 22.41 24.22Tucson IAP AGS 42.80 42.23 46.22 23.72 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 37.72 38.94 38.53 17.94 81.03Tyndall AFB 60.85 55.11 65.35 61.07 90.98United States Air Force Academy 4.42 0.00 3.60 13.92 61.68Vance AFB 38.52 39.06 39.07 21.45 87.75Vandenberg AFB 43.54 31.65 51.09 69.71 32.48W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 30.52 23.82 38.21 21.44 62.57Westover ARB 41.11 36.40 45.41 42.91 49.23Whiteman AFB 50.93 36.68 57.41 83.69 74.42Will Rogers World APT AGS 36.31 36.45 37.16 20.02 84.80Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

37.71 38.79 42.45 12.57 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 39.43 31.22 43.91 49.96 74.09Yeager APT AGS 23.37 26.94 18.54 12.58 81.12Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

27.34 25.07 30.53 12.85 73.97

85

Page 42: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

C2IS I R MC

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 5.83 0.00 5.00 24.00 53.84 Altus AFB 88.64 83.09 95.63 87.10 80.99 Andersen AFB 66.86 45.89 94.50 65.33 0.00 Andrews AFB 74.60 65.94 89.02 62.92 41.74 Arnold AFS 45.77 75.13 6.75 61.72 89.61 Atlantic City IAP AGS 41.04 39.48 42.98 40.10 41.33 Bangor IAP AGS 52.05 52.28 51.39 50.75 63.61 Barksdale AFB 87.27 77.72 95.85 97.16 80.79 Barnes MPT AGS 46.06 58.50 36.09 29.87 47.17 Beale AFB 87.21 85.75 95.17 71.86 42.78 Birmingham IAP AGS 60.70 73.71 51.02 36.72 77.96 Boise Air Terminal AGS 72.76 90.64 59.88 42.60 78.40 Bolling AFB 4.40 0.00 5.00 12.96 40.62 Bradley IAP AGS 51.78 58.63 52.53 19.31 43.06 Brooks City-Base 8.22 0.00 5.00 42.00 77.48 Buckley AFB 68.94 94.91 45.39 51.03 53.78 Burlington IAP AGS 46.63 56.72 38.46 31.49 57.07 Cannon AFB 61.46 80.34 43.36 46.67 73.61 Capital APT AGS 55.95 77.59 37.25 33.67 57.09 Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

67.40 80.36 62.58 26.40 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 67.65 81.65 63.65 30.97 23.21 Charleston AFB 79.27 66.72 91.68 86.43 75.49 Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 58.36 69.99 53.82 17.81 81.48 Cheyenne APT AGS 58.54 91.52 25.59 40.99 68.70 Cheyenne Mountain AFS 5.16 0.00 5.00 16.93 55.61 Columbus AFB 75.05 75.42 76.68 61.69 94.97 Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

53.83 71.86 40.97 22.28 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 46.99 71.89 21.45 28.84 85.51 Davis-Monthan AFB 84.67 83.94 92.46 58.85 71.89 Des Moines IAP AGS 58.26 79.13 41.00 29.17 76.75 Dobbins ARB 58.07 72.33 49.70 24.83 67.58 Dover AFB 71.92 63.88 88.84 40.51 64.93 Duluth IAP AGS 44.87 64.43 24.45 34.10 66.75 Dyess AFB 85.14 79.39 95.56 70.23 77.64 Edwards AFB 86.93 86.31 93.71 73.17 40.87 Eglin AFB 78.52 67.86 84.43 100.00 90.39 Eielson AFB 69.62 47.42 94.88 80.18 16.54 Ellington Field AGS 62.34 69.97 56.17 53.12 61.20 Ellsworth AFB 87.72 83.24 96.01 75.59 81.32 Elmendorf AFB 66.24 42.33 91.66 85.13 8.86 Ewvra Sheppard AGS 44.52 66.82 21.47 30.43 73.39 F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 38.91 59.43 21.49 19.07 29.52 Fairchild AFB 85.25 77.08 96.70 78.07 73.99

88

Page 43: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

C2ISR MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 74.73 83.53 73.31 39.61 77.32 Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 58.75 81.53 37.01 36.66 88.84 Fort Wayne IAP AGS 57.57 73.08 48.13 20.01 79.17 Francis E. Warren AFB 7.21 0.00 5.00 33.74 70.53 Fresno Air Terminal AGS 51.51 86.89 21.92 12.70 46.99 Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 56.40 71.35 45.92 30.43 59.38 Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 55.13 71.35 43.59 27.24 59.94 Goodfellow AFB 8.35 0.00 5.00 42.00 82.66 Grand Forks AFB 76.33 65.78 90.05 67.17 79.09 Great Falls IAP AGS 60.79 78.79 46.48 37.01 62.23 Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 59.00 76.58 44.80 38.20 54.24 Grissom ARB 79.93 76.34 90.00 56.25 73.25 Hancock Field AGS 43.80 60.95 21.43 52.13 66.32 Hanscom AFB 37.80 56.50 23.35 14.82 25.42 Harrisburg IAP AGS 55.72 64.81 54.24 16.64 69.50 Hector IAP AGS 54.39 69.11 42.86 29.85 72.60 Hickam AFB 60.91 42.64 84.17 63.41 1.12 Hill AFB 93.97 97.61 93.27 84.05 77.82 Holloman AFB 86.40 83.72 94.94 66.09 75.23 Homestead ARS 70.30 57.88 90.89 46.23 53.65 Hulman Regional APT AGS 55.94 76.18 40.95 18.48 82.24 Hurlburt Field 72.12 68.60 80.29 50.60 87.18 Indian Springs AFS 60.32 93.80 28.00 44.52 43.94 Jackson IAP AGS 57.06 74.28 41.23 36.56 84.66 Jacksonville IAP AGS 53.81 64.32 44.58 37.69 77.87 Joe Foss Field AGS 62.64 77.82 50.71 38.45 77.92 Keesler AFB 41.66 69.75 10.14 32.29 85.30 Key Field AGS 63.66 73.38 56.96 43.78 75.40 Kirtland AFB 79.11 89.88 70.96 65.83 69.56 Klamath Falls IAP AGS 54.87 85.74 25.83 29.79 69.01 Kulis AGS 45.79 47.22 53.55 16.45 8.01 Lackland AFB 67.20 70.16 64.57 61.71 78.33 Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 55.10 69.60 47.53 18.70 59.70 Langley AFB 71.05 66.39 76.00 70.37 77.20 Laughlin AFB 61.57 70.38 49.05 67.39 84.09 Lincoln MAP AGS 63.76 82.19 50.53 32.04 71.20 Little Rock AFB 86.18 79.83 95.18 77.58 88.12 Los Angeles AFB 2.96 0.00 5.00 2.77 23.81 Louisville IAP AGS 57.84 75.56 44.66 26.02 78.10 Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 39.18 40.81 44.68 15.24 14.06 Luke AFB 73.72 87.55 66.74 40.30 68.92 MacDill AFB 75.34 60.88 89.00 84.90 76.56 Malmstrom AFB 7.85 0.00 5.00 42.00 62.67 Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 53.80 70.59 40.01 28.84 74.01 March ARB 81.72 84.15 95.25 23.42 45.41 Martin State APT AGS 36.39 65.15 6.84 21.08 58.71

89

Page 44: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

C2ISR MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 60.61 71.98 53.91 29.90 85.68 McChord AFB 73.97 73.50 82.89 43.34 57.08 McConnell AFB 81.48 84.92 85.63 49.84 75.83 McEntire AGS 56.98 68.69 46.53 39.41 85.19 McGee Tyson APT AGS 64.42 75.33 58.62 32.94 86.02 McGuire AFB 63.36 56.40 72.72 63.08 37.26 Memphis IAP AGS 64.38 78.48 55.82 32.24 75.57 Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 55.99 54.77 63.53 32.50 47.69 Minot AFB 77.04 67.25 90.27 67.96 73.42 Moffett Federal Field AGS 63.52 82.38 56.99 15.94 15.79 Moody AFB 71.61 66.63 73.94 79.89 91.37 Mountain Home AFB 91.75 93.03 94.66 79.68 68.58 NAS New Orleans ARS 54.47 70.66 42.67 24.37 72.63 Nashville IAP AGS 60.09 75.81 47.17 36.67 78.64 Nellis AFB 83.28 93.78 81.11 53.78 43.94 New Castle County Airport AGS 43.48 63.78 26.35 20.11 47.53 Niagara Falls IAP ARS 52.69 65.58 41.71 38.22 55.66 Offutt AFB 71.16 81.84 64.48 49.23 73.20 Onizuka AFS 3.94 0.00 5.00 14.40 16.85 Otis AGB 57.17 56.11 59.43 56.46 42.04 Patrick AFB 46.28 60.98 27.36 52.11 66.83 Pease International Trade Port AGS 57.86 55.51 67.02 36.68 33.80 Peterson AFB 80.62 95.00 76.46 36.43 61.91 Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 65.31 87.46 50.17 25.54 68.42 Pittsburgh IAP AGS 63.72 68.32 66.22 30.76 69.30 Pittsburgh IAP ARS 59.59 70.35 53.88 31.34 69.59 Pope AFB 65.21 67.86 65.79 45.41 86.08 Portland IAP AGS 62.84 76.93 53.84 36.08 60.13 Quonset State APT AGS 45.72 57.24 37.48 28.26 40.59 Randolph AFB 68.96 70.53 70.16 54.40 78.51 Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 65.22 89.62 48.36 27.25 47.47 Richmond IAP AGS 51.81 67.71 40.87 18.23 75.18 Rickenbacker IAP AGS 66.58 71.89 70.92 23.04 71.11 Robins AFB 82.86 69.68 98.89 75.82 87.45 Rome Laboratory 6.06 0.00 5.00 24.00 63.10 Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 59.74 82.26 38.21 40.03 81.65 Salt Lake City IAP AGS 70.64 97.96 50.36 28.94 71.72 Savannah IAP AGS 55.75 66.62 47.65 32.08 84.65 Schenectady County APT AGS 34.25 59.13 6.59 28.20 60.05 Schriever AFB 6.58 0.00 5.00 31.07 55.46 Scott AFB 67.77 79.82 62.28 38.49 53.95 Selfridge ANGB 63.74 68.25 64.79 43.89 42.51 Seymour Johnson AFB 80.64 67.71 94.93 79.58 85.03 Shaw AFB 69.20 69.28 66.97 74.00 85.64 Sheppard AFB 75.08 81.60 75.02 44.12 80.04 Sioux Gateway APT AGS 60.23 79.87 42.42 38.85 79.98

90

Page 45: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

C2ISR MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 46.86 72.83 21.39 26.91 71.74 Stewart IAP AGS 64.52 60.65 79.15 36.82 3.65 Tinker AFB 89.52 83.36 99.40 77.69 85.80 Toledo Express APT AGS 57.76 70.74 46.77 39.94 72.76 Travis AFB 80.74 83.75 90.96 38.50 24.22 Tucson IAP AGS 70.37 83.77 63.43 36.99 72.70 Tulsa IAP AGS 61.51 82.77 44.64 28.80 81.03 Tyndall AFB 63.40 67.02 55.87 71.06 90.98 United States Air Force Academy 5.50 0.00 5.00 18.79 61.68 Vance AFB 64.47 84.79 48.60 31.13 87.75 Vandenberg AFB 58.32 80.41 34.30 62.91 32.48 W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 62.74 70.89 59.43 39.11 62.57 Westover ARB 69.46 60.24 81.93 65.22 49.23 Whiteman AFB 87.70 82.23 96.07 81.35 74.42 Will Rogers World APT AGS 62.66 83.38 43.96 39.49 84.80 Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

47.95 64.84 37.04 17.64 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 82.05 73.21 95.38 69.42 74.09 Yeager APT AGS 46.36 71.09 21.41 27.38 81.12 Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

59.42 67.86 56.27 29.97 73.97

91

Page 46: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

UAV MCI

Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 3.50 0.00 3.50 7.00 53.84Altus AFB 71.40 65.20 75.19 81.90 80.99Andersen AFB 66.19 57.98 84.74 43.52 0.00Andrews AFB 75.80 65.96 89.66 72.14 41.74Arnold AFS 52.18 53.55 44.13 70.00 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 67.55 69.15 72.15 47.70 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 52.64 53.69 55.18 34.52 63.61Barksdale AFB 78.15 64.06 88.46 99.52 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 61.49 57.97 72.46 35.69 47.17Beale AFB 73.49 65.44 85.11 70.00 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 57.58 66.96 50.79 37.53 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 73.07 65.17 89.79 38.69 78.40Bolling AFB 2.85 0.00 3.50 3.78 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 54.51 57.50 61.92 12.80 43.06Brooks City-Base 7.59 0.00 3.50 42.00 77.48Buckley AFB 71.28 59.26 86.13 69.41 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 58.94 58.03 70.57 15.33 57.07Cannon AFB 6 6 8 38.91 2.20 5.08 1.53 73.61Capital APT AGS 56.07 59.52 61.41 17.74 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

64.57 66.43 69.33 34.20 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 58.21 68.06 54.31 37.78 23.21Charleston AFB 86.52 80.71 95.78 77.50 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 56.07 68.36 53.11 5.38 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 45.76 55.96 35.17 37.00 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 3.36 0.00 3.50 5.16 55.61Columbus AFB 70.70 65.30 74.90 72.13 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

54.40 57.59 60.55 12.40 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 65.21 74.74 67.44 7.00 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 78.62 70.94 91.98 60.16 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 59.73 57.41 71.90 15.61 76.75Dobbins ARB 70.03 64.99 86.19 26.70 67.58Dover AFB 7 7 9 37.21 4.27 1.58 4.20 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 55.85 54.43 63.10 29.50 66.75Dyess AFB 72.37 59.00 88.59 65.28 77.64Edwards AFB 82.10 81.07 81.76 98.60 40.87Eglin AFB 86.68 77.83 93.05 100.00 90.39Eielson AFB 7 6 8 17.36 5.92 8.26 00.00 16.54Ellington Field AGS 68.78 63.01 73.60 77.29 61.20Ellsworth AFB 69.73 53.57 84.97 77.99 81.32Elmendorf AFB 72.76 58.35 87.82 92.50 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 57.09 67.62 55.86 9.72 73.39F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 51.58 57.24 56.21 11.80 29.52Fairchild AFB 74.12 61.03 87.00 80.88 73.99

94

Page 47: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

UAV MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 60.48 65.46 59.05 39.30 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 66.40 68.76 72.52 24.49 88.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 54.87 55.02 63.53 12.22 79.17Francis E. Warren AFB 5.81 0.00 3.50 25.96 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 66.19 75.17 71.07 9.46 46.99Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 51.32 58.69 46.80 34.20 59.38Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 52.52 57.72 50.83 33.78 59.94Goodfellow AFB 7.72 0.00 3.50 42.00 82.66Grand Forks AFB 7 5 8 70.93 7.40 5.56 0.36 79.09Great Falls IAP AGS 357.35 56.82 62.52 7.00 62.23Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 56.57 58.17 61.83 27.86 54.24Grissom ARB 55.77 48.64 62.41 56.66 73.25Hancock Field AGS 53.74 55.13 50.44 57.94 66.32Hanscom AFB 45.36 55.80 44.69 5.02 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 59.02 65.06 64.90 4.20 69.50Hector IAP AGS 56.74 59.89 62.91 12.56 72.60Hickam AFB 68.25 61.83 86.70 38.04 1.12Hill AFB 79.39 68.52 88.37 92.50 77.82Holloman AFB 78.35 70.80 89.43 67.86 75.23Homestead ARS 74.95 68.69 89.81 47.38 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 59.10 56.94 71.62 11.28 82.24Hurlburt Field 81.77 78.71 92.99 47.87 87.18Indian Springs AFS 73.55 80.16 76.69 37.51 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 56.75 65.60 49.99 37.00 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 75.01 86.63 74.37 23.51 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 62.15 58.35 70.92 39.32 77.92Keesler AFB 57.18 72.68 48.57 14.63 85.30Key Field AGS 61.23 68.61 59.02 32.90 75.40Kirtland AFB 79.62 68.48 89.98 90.40 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 63.68 63.67 75.86 11.83 69.01Kulis AGS 57.67 60.78 70.19 3.78 8.01Lackland AFB 63.92 60.22 66.89 64.99 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 51.04 54.69 57.75 4.20 59.70Langley AFB 84.59 78.75 95.55 67.76 77.20Laughlin AFB 61.06 62.25 56.19 70.00 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 49.61 59.41 45.90 14.50 71.20Little Rock AFB 78.75 66.33 89.30 89.81 88.12Los Angeles AFB 2.13 0.00 3.50 0.81 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 50.76 58.78 45.97 26.91 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 57.68 67.91 61.86 4.20 14.06Luke AFB 80.11 76.95 92.26 46.96 68.92MacDill AFB 87.68 78.74 95.31 100.00 76.56Malmstrom AFB 7.22 0.00 3.50 42.00 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 44.42 50.27 45.19 7.00 74.01March ARB 80.41 81.53 92.57 33.47 45.41Martin State APT AGS 55.54 63.99 57.19 8.99 58.71

95

Page 48: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

UAV MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 71.67 76.58 79.65 12.47 85.68McChord AFB 69.04 60.71 88.57 29.24 57.08McConnell AFB 74.09 67.61 89.30 40.32 75.83McEntire AGS 75.68 76.04 85.06 32.70 85.19McGee Tyson APT AGS 56.22 64.71 55.98 10.69 86.02McGuire AFB 69.92 59.32 80.98 80.89 37.26Memphis IAP AGS 55.70 62.92 51.06 36.76 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 50.62 48.34 57.23 34.41 47.69Minot AFB 67.53 48.34 85.44 79.92 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 60.91 63.20 74.29 6.16 15.79Moody AFB 89.88 87.74 91.55 92.50 91.37Mountain Home AFB 78.18 65.91 90.43 86.23 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 68.17 68.05 82.63 7.58 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 55.89 60.69 53.74 37.00 78.64Nellis AFB 82.35 79.65 94.28 54.82 43.94New Castle County Airport AGS 53.60 69.59 46.97 9.12 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 54.78 56.76 56.82 37.02 55.66Offutt AFB 56.33 52.52 62.60 43.63 73.20Onizuka AFS 2.29 0.00 3.50 4.20 16.85Otis AGB 64.68 51.23 80.20 67.76 42.04Patrick AFB 72.94 79.87 72.47 44.48 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 55.73 44.45 73.53 39.16 33.80Peterson AFB 58.41 63.64 58.08 34.90 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 61.46 76.55 51.47 31.76 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 58.27 53.38 68.83 34.30 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 54.04 58.13 53.25 34.56 69.59Pope AFB 84.07 84.80 94.48 37.00 86.08Portland IAP AGS 67.22 63.96 79.05 34.90 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 49.76 55.44 47.67 34.68 40.59Randolph AFB 64.95 61.17 70.15 57.42 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 59.47 69.14 61.09 11.28 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 68.08 83.30 65.36 7.59 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 51.88 53.57 58.14 13.27 71.11Robins AFB 86.43 77.79 95.77 87.16 87.45Rome Laboratory 3.73 0.00 3.50 7.00 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 70.09 63.34 84.85 37.00 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 56.83 68.89 47.87 34.79 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 67.27 82.02 62.58 14.50 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 49.44 58.83 43.41 28.64 60.05Schriever AFB 6.11 0.00 3.50 32.66 55.46Scott AFB 61.57 63.04 70.28 20.48 53.95Selfridge ANGB 62.07 56.04 79.38 22.86 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 93.59 91.03 96.36 96.02 85.03Shaw AFB 84.59 78.14 89.79 92.52 85.64Sheppard AFB 64.77 65.08 74.11 20.72 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 60.63 57.85 69.82 30.36 79.98

96

Page 49: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

UAV MCI Crt 1 Crt 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 48.50 50.71 49.27 29.31 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 57.04 60.27 61.08 38.79 3.65Tinker AFB 73.31 65.36 83.66 63.66 85.80Toledo Express APT AGS 56.55 55.13 60.08 44.40 72.76Travis AFB 69.53 60.58 89.86 37.58 24.22Tucson IAP AGS 63.14 70.88 65.12 16.96 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 57.50 66.58 56.36 14.50 81.03Tyndall AFB 84.49 82.20 88.33 77.50 90.98United States Air Force Academy 3.87 0.00 3.50 8.76 61.68Vance AFB 55.91 66.77 53.58 7.68 87.75Vandenberg AFB 71.94 61.11 85.26 76.44 32.48W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 63.36 53.14 78.63 47.33 62.57Westover ARB 59.33 59.19 59.24 62.90 49.23Whiteman AFB 75.06 61.63 88.66 80.57 74.42Will Rogers World APT AGS 61.95 65.22 62.09 40.63 84.80Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

60.56 65.89 69.03 6.13 39.74

Wright-Patterson AFB 68.44 54.80 79.56 83.64 74.09Yeager APT AGS 51.21 53.81 52.44 26.70 81.12Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

52.03 52.38 54.07 36.46 73.97

97

Page 50: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Spa e ns ce Op ratio MCI

Crt 1 Cart 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) 11.94 16.50 0.00 30.00 53.84Altus AFB 39.82 66.50 2.00 63.80 80.99Andersen AFB 176.39 66.50 00.00 43.03 0.00Andrews AFB 1053.96 16.50 0.00 38.28 41.74Arnold AFS 84.33 66.50 100.00 100.00 89.61Atlantic City IAP AGS 355.53 66.50 6.40 88.00 41.33Bangor IAP AGS 40.33 66.50 12.40 30.00 63.61Barksdale AFB 84.01 66.50 100.00 99.03 80.79Barnes MPT AGS 23.61 42.72 1.20 22.83 47.17Beale AFB 86.96 74.76 100.00 100.00 42.78Birmingham IAP AGS 33.63 57.00 7.20 24.66 77.96Boise Air Terminal AGS 43.37 66.50 18.02 33.38 78.40Bolling AFB 10.61 16.50 0.91 16.20 40.62Bradley IAP AGS 12.77 16.50 5.44 18.42 43.06Brooks City-Base 10 161.03 16.50 0.00 00.00 77.48Buckley AFB 1084.96 72.24 0.00 88.90 53.78Burlington IAP AGS 35.14 66.50 0.30 30.00 57.07Cannon AFB 766.56 66.50 4.56 31.93 73.61Capital APT AGS 39.12 66.50 8.60 35.31 57.09Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

11.21 16.50 0.00 18.00 72.70

Channel Islands AGS 44.22 66.50 26.40 20.90 23.21Charleston AFB 10 1083.98 66.50 0.00 0.00 75.49Charlotte/Douglas IAP AGS 15.25 16.50 8.63 20.35 81.48Cheyenne APT AGS 35.31 66.50 0.00 30.00 68.70Cheyenne Mountain AFS 35.13 66.50 2.40 21.48 55.61Columbus AFB 78.89 66.50 100.00 44.25 94.97Dane County Regional - Truax Field AGS

35.14 66.50 2.19 21.00 61.55

Dannelly Field AGS 36.54 66.50 1.96 30.00 85.51Davis-Monthan AFB 1077.42 66.50 0.00 35.31 71.89Des Moines IAP AGS 133.18 50.72 1.59 31.15 76.75Dobbins ARB 18.05 16.50 16.80 18.00 67.58Dover AFB 37.33 66.50 8.00 18.00 64.93Duluth IAP AGS 4.24 30.00 66.7537.02 66.50Dyess AFB 79.98 1066.50 0.00 59.45 77.64Edwards AFB 65.84 30.26 1 94.00 00.00 40.87Eglin AFB 84.35 66.50 100.00 100.00 90.39Eielson AFB 82.50 66.50 100.00 100.00 16.54Ellington Field AGS 19.75 16.50 4.42 88.00 61.20Ellsworth AFB 84.12 66.50 100.00 100.00 81.32Elmendorf AFB 82.31 66.50 100.00 100.00 8.86Ewvra Sheppard AGS 36.76 66.50 3.24 30.00 73.39F. S. Gabreski APT AGS 10.46 16.50 0.80 18.00 29.52Fairchild AFB 79.80 66.50 98.40 65.24 73.99

100

Page 51: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Space Operations MCI Crt 1 Cart 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Forbes Field AGS 37.88 66.50 5.60 30.38 77.32Fort Smith Regional APT AGS 77.76 66.50 98.40 841.10 8.84Fort Wayne IAP AGS 35.89 66.02 3.94 19.04 79.17Francis E. Warren AFB 80.64 66.50 100.00 67.90 70.53Fresno Air Terminal AGS 5.7935.00 66.50 8.35 46.99Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 10.87 16.50 0.00 18.00 59.38Gen Mitchell IAP ARS 0.8311.05 16.50 16.20 59.94Goodfellow AFB 94.6881.95 66.50 100.00 82.66Grand Forks AFB 82.64 66.50 100.00 85.72 79.09Great Falls IAP AGS 3.6036.64 66.50 30.00 62.23Greater Peoria Regional APT AGS 23.7746.03 66.50 42.19 54.24Grissom ARB 52.66 66.50 38.68 41.88 73.25Hancock Field AGS 47.5755.93 57.76 79.58 66.32Hanscom AFB 21.10 16.50 26.30 19.64 25.42Harrisburg IAP AGS 37.91 66.50 9.12 18.00 69.50Hector IAP AGS 38.37 66.50 4.91 39.17 72.60Hickam AFB 28.01 16.50 41.40 32.08 1.12Hill AFB 70.93 38.00 100.00 100.00 77.82Holloman AFB 82.04 66.50 100.00 80.69 75.23Homestead ARS 20.62 16.50 19.20 37.24 53.65Hulman Regional APT AGS 35.22 66.50 2.28 16.20 82.24Hurlburt Field 80.19 66.50 100.00 59.20 87.18Indian Springs AFS 67.24 66.50 73.79 49.31 43.94Jackson IAP AGS 35.71 66.50 0.00 30.00 84.66Jacksonville IAP AGS 14.96 16.50 5.60 30.97 77.87Joe Foss Field AGS 39.59 66.50 9.16 32.51 77.92Keesler AFB 37.19 66.50 3.55 30.00 85.30Key Field AGS 36.53 66.50 2.52 30.00 75.40Kirtland AFB 82.93 66.50 100.00 91.00 69.56Klamath Falls IAP AGS 37.15 66.50 4.40 30.00 69.01Kulis AGS 42.62 66.50 24.61 16.20 8.01Lackland AFB 37.23 16.50 52.09 60.56 78.33Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS 10.88 16.50 0.00 18.00 59.70Langley AFB 33.19 16.50 48.18 36.83 77.20Laughlin AFB 84.19 66.50 100.00 100.00 84.09Lincoln MAP AGS 35.37 66.50 0.00 30.00 71.20Little Rock AFB 82.99 66.50 100.00 86.97 88.12Los Angeles AFB 8.54 16.50 0.00 3.46 23.81Louisville IAP AGS 35.44 66.50 2.64 18.00 78.10Luis Munoz Marin IAP AGS 32.74 66.50 0.00 18.00 14.06Luke AFB 76.46 66.50 100.00 26.48 68.92MacDill AFB 45.34 21.44 56.80 100.00 76.56Malmstrom AFB 83.66 66.50 100.00 100.00 62.67Mansfield Lahm MAP AGS 35.44 66.50 0.00 30.00 74.01March ARB 37.22 66.50 11.12 8.77 45.41Martin State APT AGS 19.75 16.50 21.20 18.92 58.71

101

Page 52: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Space Operations MCI Crt 1 Cart 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Maxwell AFB 36.78 66.50 2.40 30.48 85.68McChord AFB 43.90 66.50 20.00 35.80 57.08McConnell AFB 51.76 66.50 32.00 59.93 75.83McEntire AGS 45.31 66.50 21.60 36.28 85.19McG Tyson APT AGS 53.26 100.00 6.40ee 24.47 86.02McGuire 37.26 AFB 81.21 63.88 100.00 94.00 Memphis IAP AGS 11.28 16.50 0.00 18.00 75.57Minn/St Paul IAP ARS 10.67 16.50 0.00 18.90 47.69Minot AFB 83.93 66.50 100.00 100.00 73.42Moffett Federal Field AGS 13.32 16.50 7.60 21.91 15.79Moody AFB 84.37 66.50 100.00 100.00 91.37Mountain Home AFB 83.80 66.50 100.00 100.00 68.58NAS New Orleans ARS 36.90 66.50 3.60 30.00 72.63Nashville IAP AGS 12.69 16.50 0.32 30.00 78.64Nellis A 43.94FB 77.45 66.50 100.00 42.64 New Castle County Airport AGS 11.26 16.50 1.20 19.83 47.53Niagara Falls IAP ARS 34.62 66.50 2.02 18.02 55.66Offutt AFB 79.31 65.54 100.00 58.27 73.20Onizuka 5 AFS 21.43 41.76 0.00 18.00 16.8Otis AGB 63.83 60.32 63.20 88.00 42.04Patrick AFB 49.37 83.00 13.50 39.20 66.83Pease International Trade Port AGS 47.03 66.50 28.80 36.35 33.80Peterson AFB 63.95 66.50 71.60 21.00 61.91Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP AGS 33.05 66.50 0.00 7.52 68.42Pittsburgh IAP AGS 12.61 16.50 3.60 18.00 69.30Pittsburgh IAP ARS 15.01 16.50 9.17 18.72 69.59Pope AFB 45.30 66.50 23.04 30.00 86.08Portland IAP AGS 12.15 16.50 2.32 21.00 60.13Quonset State APT AGS 33.50 66.50 0.00 18.97 40.59Randolph AFB 38.25 16.50 56.00 54.62 78.51Reno-Tahoe IAP AGS 33.57 66.50 0.42 16.20 47.47Richmond IAP AGS 13.74 16.50 4.80 22.83 75.18Rickenbacker IAP AGS 28.18 50.00 3.10 21.14 71.11Robins AFB 77.90 54.94 97.44 100.00 87.45Rome Laboratory 76.67 66.50 100.00 30.00 63.10Rosecrans Memorial APT AGS 35.63 66.50 0.00 30.00 81.65Salt Lake City IAP AGS 12.13 16.50 1.04 23.17 71.72Savannah IAP AGS 38.52 63.54 10.06 30.00 84.65Schenectady County APT AGS 37.17 66.50 7.12 21.28 60.05Schriever AFB 96.54 100.00 100.00 76.52 55.46Scott AFB 58.10 66.50 56.14 28.62 53.95Selfridge ANGB 21.35 16.50 26.12 18.58 42.51Seymour Johnson AFB 56.51 66.50 35.16 92.03 85.03Shaw AFB 71.70 66.50 69.80 100.00 85.64Sheppard AFB 77.28 66.50 100.00 31.93 80.04Sioux Gateway APT AGS 36.26 66.50 1.20 31.69 79.98

102

Page 53: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Space Operations MCI Crt 1 Cart 2 Crt 3 Crt 4 Base Overall

MCI Score

Current and Future Mission

Condition of Infra-structure

Contingency ,Mobilization ,Future Forces

Cost of Ops / Manpower

Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS 34.48 66.50 0.00 20.97 71.74Stewart IAP AGS 37.38 66.50 9.60 27.17 3.65Tinker AFB 33.51 3 57.03 85.8023.36 35.9Toledo Express APT AGS 36.29 0 44.72 72.7616.50 54.0Travis AFB 75.79 66. 100.00 30.89 24.2250Tucson IAP AGS 38.33 66.50 6.32 33.02 72.70Tulsa IAP AGS 13.34 717.74 0.3 30.00 81.03Tyndall AFB 84.36 066.50 100.0 100.00 90.98United States Air Force Academy 40.15 66.50 12.40 28.72 61.68Vance AFB 39.47 87.7566.50 8.76 30.48Vandenberg AFB 90.49 100.00 100.00 32.4883.00W. K. Kellogg APT AGS 53.29 35.38 62.5766.50 42.40Westover ARB 53.63 74.00 20.56 49.2342.68Whiteman AFB 56 61.14 74.4250. 66.50 28.92Will Rogers World APT AG 31.45 84.80S 20.00 23.36 9.60Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willo 11.62 21.86 39.74w Grove Joint Reserve

16.50 2.04

Wright-Patterson AFB 78 100.0058. 16.50 78.39 74.09Yeager APT AGS 48.70 66.50 34.40 18.00 81.12Youngstown-Warren RARS

7.07egional APT 3 66.50 5.73 22.49 73.97

103

Page 54: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

BASE CLOSURE AND

REALIGNMENT REPORT

Volume VI

May 2005

Page 55: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

iv

FFLLIIGGHHTT TTRRAAIINNIINNGG SSUUBBGGRROOUUPP MMIILLIITTAARRYY VVAALLUUEE AANNAALLYYSSIISS Section 1: Introduction

The Flight Training (FT) Military Value Analysis captured and compared data that revealed DoD installations’ suitability to host Undergraduate or Graduate-level Flight Training sub-functions, e.g., Undergraduate Fixed-wing Pilot Training, Undergraduate Rotary-wing Pilot Training, Undergraduate Navigator/Naval Flight Officer/Combat Systems Officer Training, Graduate-level Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Initial Joint Training, and Initial Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Training. FT survey questions targeted DoD’s 12 primary flight-training installations and all DoD-owned bases that could reasonably accept the JSF or UAV training missions. To create a meaningful measure of merit and final ranking, FT developed survey questions that captured specific information for each installation as it related to six global attributes relevant to each of the following sub-functions: Airfield Capacity, Weather, Environment, Quality of Life, Managed Training Areas and Ground Training Facilities. The final ranking provided a list of installations ranked most-to-least dear as they relate to the specific sub-function examined. The FT military value analysis followed the E&T JCSG methodology and Military Value Scoring Plans approved by the ISG. Section 2: Military Value Score The following charts provide the numerical score by sub-function and location within the purview of the E&T JCSG Flight Training Subgroup:

Education and Training JCSG Flight Training Subgroup

Undergraduate Fixed-wing Pilot

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

NAS Pensacola, FL 68.40 17.29 10.63 8.94 7.26 13.98 10.29 Laughlin AFB, TX 65.37 19.23 8.83 9.08 5.39 12.61 10.23 Vance AFB, OK 63.23 18.79 6.67 10.07 5.13 12.22 10.34 NAS Meridian, MS 62.94 18.69 8.44 7.96 5.12 14.71 8.01 NAS Kingsville, TX 62.69 17.85 9.69 8.30 4.22 13.67 8.96 NAS Whiting Field, FL 62.28 16.09 8.00 8.02 5.73 16.93

7.51

Page 56: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

2

Undergraduate Fixed-wing Pilot (continued)

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

NAS Corpus Christi, TX 60.38 17.10 10.23 9.01 5.10 13.40 5.53

Columbus AFB, MS 60.22 17.98 7.28 9.00 3.95 10.78 11.23 Sheppard AFB, TX 59.73 18.51 8.47 8.03 5.15 9.24 10.33 Randolph AFB, TX 57.60 17.82 6.77 7.00 4.94 10.70 10.38 Moody AFB, GA 56.24 18.88 6.25 9.72 2.91 9.49 8.99

Education and Training JCSG Flight Training Subgroup

Undergraduate Rotary-wing Pilot

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

Fort Rucker, AL 81.37 23.59 11.49 7.81 5.21 22.87 10.40 NAS Whiting Field, FL 67.50 16.92 9.84 6.72 5.53 20.39 8.10

Education and Training JCSG Flight Training Subgroup

Undergraduate Navigator/Naval Flight Officer/Combat Systems Officer

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

NAS Pensacola, FL 73.07 14.37 9.15 10.36 7.26 18.03 13.90 Sheppard AFB, TX 70.92 15.61 6.85 9.47 5.15 18.46 15.38 Laughlin AFB, TX 70.04 16.21 7.26 10.16 5.39 15.55 15.47

Vance AFB, OK 68.00 14.81 5.36 11.13 5.13 16.09 15.47

NAS Kingsville, TX 65.10 14.62 8.79 9.62 4.22 15.77 12.08 NAS Corpus Christi, TX 64.90 13.75 9.24 10.09 5.10 19.28 7.44

Page 57: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

3

Undergraduate Navigator/Naval Flight Officer/Combat Systems Officer (continued) NAS Whiting Field, FL 64.47 13.43 8.80 9.22 5.73 17.19 10.10

Columbus AFB, MS 63.90 14.96 4.57 10.10 3.95 15.15 15.18

Randolph AFB, TX 62.61 15.61 6.24 8.12 4.94 12.03 15.67

NAS Meridian, MS 61.96 15.25 6.34 9.40 5.12 15.07 10.77 Moody AFB, GA 61.35 15.43 5.32 9.51 2.91 14.37 13.80

Education and Training JCSG Flight Training Subgroup

Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Graduate-level Initial Joint Training Site

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

Eglin AFB, FL 72.44 14.36 8.73 12.24 4.38 19.98 10.25 Laughlin AFB, TX 67.78 14.05 6.05 14.01 5.77 16.21 11.29 *Cherry Point, NC 66.32 16.12 7.92 11.75 4.67 14.63 8.97 Pensacola, FL 66.88 13.63 7.44 12.83 7.73 13.69 10.21 Tyndall AFB, FL 64.94 16.94 7.92 11.70 3.69 12.49 10.85 Vance AFB, TX 64.24 15.28 4.41 13.92 5.49 13.44 11.29 Kingsville, TX 64.23 14.15 6.99 12.03 4.53 17.09 8.43

NAS Meridian, MS 64.11 14.85 6.03 11.71 5.48 16.80 7.89 Shaw AFB, SC 63.98 15.77 8.33 13.92 4.08 9.89 10.11 *Yuma, AZ 63.90 16.57 10.95 9.08 3.54 12.69 9.54

Columbus AFB, MS 62.84 14.22 5.07 13.93 4.24 13.87 11.09 *Randolph AFB, TX 60.77 13.35 4.92 10.21 5.29 15.17 11.43 Beaufort, SC 59.43 12.06 9.23 11.71 6.06 10.70 9.25 *Sheppard AFB, TX 58.38 14.46 5.74 12.37 5.50 9.01 11.29 Moody AFB, GA 57.10 15.76 4.28 11.80 3.15 10.66 10.14 *Note: Four installations added for analysis at the request of the Services.

Page 58: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

4

Education and Training JCSG

Flight Training Subgroup

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Initial Joint Training Site

Installation MilVal Score Airfield Weather Environ-

ment QoL Managed Training

GT Facilities

FT Rucker, AL 78.39 16.53 13.11 11.20 5.39 19.85 12.30 Choctaw NOLF, FL 73.66 7.76 13.46 10.86 7.26 22.67 11.65 FT Huachuca, AZ 58.25 10.69 10.22 10.21 2.54 18.64 5.94 Indian Springs, NV 57.06 10.37 13.59 10.74 0 16.52 5.85 Section 3: Results of Analysis The FT Subgroup was able to compile a useful measure of merit regarding Military Value of training installations. Overall, NAS Pensacola received the highest score for Undergraduate Fixed Wing Pilot Training and Fort Rucker received the highest score for Undergraduate Rotary Wing Training. Although only 2 installations currently conduct Undergraduate Navigator / Naval Flight Officer / Combat Systems Officer training, all 11 undergraduate flight training bases were included in the scoring for comparative analysis. Laughlin AFB received the highest score for this function. Since there are no installations that host JSF training, the Flight Training subgroup evaluated 965 airfields within CONUS against criteria developed by the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office for the Initial Training Site. Of the 31 bases that met the initial criteria, 20 were eliminated using military judgment. The Services subsequently requested 4 of the eliminated bases (based on military judgment) be reconsidered and included in the list of 11 remaining bases. Eglin AFB received the highest military value score for the list of 15 bases “best” suited for hosting the Initial Joint Training Site for the JSF. For UAV training, the Army requested that FT Rucker be included in military value scoring along with the 3 sites that currently train UAV operators. FT Rucker received the highest score of the 4 sites.

Page 59: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

5

PPRROOFFEESSSSIIOONNAALL DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT EEDDUUCCAATTIIOONN SSUUBBGGRROOUUPP MMIILLIITTAARRYY VVAALLUUEE AANNAALLYYSSIISS

Section 1: Introduction

The Professional Development Education (PDE) Subgroup established criteria in order of importance. Next attributes were designed that were indicative of military value in the sub-functions. Finally, the subgroup selected metrics that would measure the attributes and developed questions that would allow data to be collected for each. The PDE Subgroup military value analysis followed the E&T JCSG methodology and Military Value Scoring Plans approved by the ISG.

Note: For the analysis of historical data, the basis was academic years 2000-2002. Due to anomalies caused by Operation IRAQI FREEDOM and Operation ENDURING FREEDOM, student data for academic year 2003 was not used. Analysis parallels force projection figures to account for manning combat operations.

Section 2: Military Value Score A numerical score by function and location is provided for each approved sub-function within the PDE Subgroup’s purview:

Education and Training JCSG Professional Development Education Subgroup

JPME/PME Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

Marine Corps Base Quantico, VA 65.3 Ft. Leavenworth, KS 59.3 Maxwell AFB, AL 53.8 Carlisle Barracks, PA 53.6 Ft. McNair, DC 52.7 * Naval Station Newport, RI 52.5 Naval Station Norfolk, VA 47.5 * Fort McNair’s military value score did not include data for Lincoln Hall nor buildable

acres, reference 2 Feb 05 E&T JCSG meeting minutes.

Page 60: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

6

Education and Training JCSG Professional Development Education Subgroup

Graduate Education Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

Monterey, CA (Naval Postgraduate School) 74.7 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH (Air Force Institute of Technology)

52.0

Education and Training JCSG

Professional Development Education Subgroup Other Full Time Education (Defense Agencies) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

Ft. Belvoir, VA (Defense Acquisition University)

58.8

Memphis, TN (Defense Contract Audit Institute)

40.5

Patrick AFB, FL (Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute)

43.7

Education and Training JCSG

Professional Development Education Subgroup Other Full Time Education (Chaplains) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

Ft. Jackson, SC 51.6

Maxwell AFB, AL 41.3 Naval Station Newport, RI 34.1

Education and Training JCSG Professional Development Education Subgroup

Other Full Time Education (JAGs) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

Maxwell AFB, AL 45.4 Charlottesville, VA 33.5 Naval Station Newport, RI 33.2

Page 61: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

8

SSPPEECCIIAALLIIZZEEDD SSKKIILLLL TTRRAAIINNIINNGG SSUUBBGGRROOUUPP MMIILLIITTAARRYY VVAALLUUEE AANNAALLYYSSIISS

Section 1: Introduction

The Specialized Skill Training (SST) function includes the sub-functions of initial skill training, skill progression training, and functional training. The six attributes analyzed under each sub-function were location, quality of life, training facilities/resources, support for other missions, training mission/throughput, and environmental constraints/expansion potential. The Specialized Skill Training analysis followed the approach approved by the ISG. Section 2: Military Value Score The following SST analysis provides a numerical score by function and by location. Military Value scores were compiled only for specific locations that currently conduct SST. The Military Value score only pertains to SST functions at the location, not the Military Value of the entire location.

Education and Training JCSG Specialized Skill Training Subgroup

Initial Skills Training Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Sheppard AFB, TX 63.06 Pensacola, FL 56.75 Lackland AFB, TX 53.67 Keesler AFB, MS 52.00 Fort Leonard Wood, MO 51.07 Fort Benning, GA 48.15 Goodfellow AFB, TX 47.04 Fort Lee, VA 45.55 Fort Knox, KY 43.06 Oceana, VA 42.96 Fort Gordon, GA 42.05 Camp Lejeune, NC 41.87 Fort Bliss, TX 41.35 Kings Bay, GA 40.79

Page 62: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

9

Initial Skills Training (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Fort Huachuca, AZ 40.69 Fort Eustis, VA 40.27 Tyndall AFB, FL 40.10 Charleston, SC 39.72 Great Lakes, IL 39.31 Gulfport, MS 39.04 Maxwell AFB, AL 38.92 Norfolk, VA 38.55 Fairchild AFB, WA 38.35 Fort McCoy, WI 38.04 Little Creek, VA 37.37 Kirtland AFB, NM 36.59 Pope AFB, NC 36.58 Fort Sill, OK 36.37 Groton, CT 35.82 Coronado, CA 35.43 Port Hueneme, CA 35.33 Pt. Loma, CA 35.15 Fort Jackson, SC 35.07 USN San Diego, CA 35.06 Camp Pendleton, CA 35.02 Vandenberg AFB, CA 34.96 Yuma, AZ 34.80 Fort Rucker, AL 34.62 Meridian, MS 34.10 Eglin AFB, FL 33.97 Fallon, NV 32.74 Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA 32.38 Twenty-Nine Palms, CA 32.17 Newport, RI 31.85 Panama City, FL 31.80 Fort Belvoir, VA 31.78 Bolling AFB, DC 31.55 Whidbey Island, WA 30.87 Mayport, FL 30.85 Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 30.84

Page 63: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

10

Initial Skills Training (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Brunswick, ME 30.79 Athens, GA 30.09 Redstone Arsenal, AL 29.73 Ballston Spa, NY 29.53 Fort Bragg, NC 29.42 Bangor, WA 29.36 Dahlgren, VA 28.08 Fort Dix, NJ 27.72 Fort Campbell, KY 27.34 USMC San Diego, CA 26.90 Pearl Harbor, HI 26.67 Quantico, VA 26.06 Fort Monmouth, NJ 25.57 Wallops Island, VA 25.54 Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 25.43 Crane, IN 25.21 Presidio of Monterey, CA 24.80 Willow Grove, PA 24.59 Fort Meade, MD 24.19 Bridgeport, CA 24.02

Education and Training JCSG Specialized Skill Training Subgroup

Skills Progression Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Kings Bay, GA 56.45 Norfolk, VA 52.68 Oceana, VA 51.99 Fort Leonard Wood, MO 50.32 Sheppard AFB, TX 49.34 Fort Knox, TN 49.06 Kirtland AFB, NM 45.97 Fort Eustis, VA 45.33 Fort McCoy, WI 44.76

Page 64: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

11

Skills Progression (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Pensacola, FL 44.44 USN San Diego, CA 44.08 Lackland AFB, TX 43.74 Fort Benning, GA 43.41 Pt. Loma, CA 43.17 Little Creek, VA 43.16 Gulfport, MS 42.36 Fort Gordon, GA 41.74 Fort Jackson, SC 41.72 Charleston, SC 41.02 Fort Huachuca, AZ 40.83 Brunswick, ME 40.70 Goodfellow AFB, TX 40.22 Fort Rucker, AL 40.17 Fort Belvoir, VA 40.16 Fort Lee, VA 40.00 Eglin AFB, FL 39.88 Camp Lejeune, NC 39.86 Groton, CT 39.56 Fort Bliss, TX 39.55 Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA 39.43 Keesler AFB, MS 39.43 Bangor, WA 38.73 Fort Sill, OK 38.61 Whidbey Island, WA 38.27 Fairchild AFB, WA 38.07 Fort Campbell, KY 37.86 Coronado, CA 37.74 Fort Bragg, NC 37.68 Bolling AFB, DC 37.18 Mayport, FL 37.16 Newport, RI 37.12 Tyndall AFB, FL 36.66 Fallon, NV 36.53 Port Hueneme, CA 36.30

Page 65: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

12

Skills Progression (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Great Lakes, IL 35.94 Dahlgren, VA 35.90 Maxwell AFB, AL 35.77 Yuma, AZ 35.59 Camp Pendleton, CA 35.24 Redstone Arsenal, AL 35.03 Ballston Spa, NY 34.88 Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 34.70 Vandenberg AFB, CA 34.46 Panama City, FL 34.41 Pope AFB, NC 34.08 Meridian, MS 33.90 Pearl Harbor, HI 32.91 Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 32.55 Bridgeport, CA 32.43 Twenty-Nine Palms, CA 31.97 Athens, GA 31.74 Willow Grove, PA 31.07 USMC San Diego, CA 30.60 Quantico, VA 30.58 Fort Dix, NJ 30.06 Fort Monmouth, NJ 30.04 Fort Meade, MD 29.37 Crane, IN 29.29 Wallops Island, VA 28.25 Presidio of Monterey, CA 26.69

Education and Training JCSG Specialized Skill Training Subgroup

Functional Training Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Norfolk, VA 51.29 Fort Benning, GA 51.08 Oceana, VA 47.85

Page 66: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

13

Functional Training (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Sheppard AFB, TX 47.50 Little Creek, VA 45.68 Pearl Harbor, HI 45.61 Fort Leonard Wood, MO 45.50 Kings Bay, GA 45.34 Pt. Loma, CA 44.50 Lackland AFB, TX 44.36 Fort Knox, TN 43.08 Fort Belvoir, VA 43.03 Gulfport, MS 42.96 Port Hueneme, CA 42.33 Charleston, SC 42.09 Fort Sill, OK 42.08 Goodfellow AFB, TX 41.81 USN San Diego, CA 41.36 Fort McCoy, WI 41.14 Brunswick, ME 40.90 Kirtland AFB, NM 40.82 Fort Eustis, VA 40.70 Tyndall AFB, FL 40.48 Pensacola, FL 39.83 Fort Lee, VA 39.45 Bangor, WA 39.40 Coronado, CA 39.06 Mayport, FL 39.02 Fort Huachuca, AZ 38.78 Camp Lejeune, NC 38.74 Fort Bliss, TX 38.62 Fallon, NV 38.29 Fort Campbell, KY 38.24 Keesler AFB, MS 37.97 Bolling AFB, DC 37.85 Groton, CT 37.85 Fort Gordon, GA 37.40 Fort Rucker, AL 37.37

Page 67: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

14

Functional Training (continued) Installations/Location Numerical Military Value Score Fort Jackson, SC 37.01 Fairchild AFB, WA 36.64 Eglin AFB, FL 36.63 Yuma, AZ 36.63 Vandenberg AFB, CA 36.63 Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA 35.59 Newport, RI 35.48 Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 35.39 Bridgeport, CA 34.64 Ballston Spa, NY 34.44 Great Lakes, IL 34.13 Redstone Arsenal, AL 34.03 Fort Bragg, NC 33.97 Meridian, MS 33.40 Maxwell AFB, AL 33.30 Panama City, FL 32.24 Whidbey Island, WA 31.41 USMC San Diego, CA 31.15 Camp Pendleton, CA 30.97 Willow Grove, PA 30.41 Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 30.29 Athens, GA 30.02 Quantico, VA 30.00 Twenty-Nine Palms, CA 29.99 Dahlgren, VA 29.86 Pope AFB, NC 29.54 Fort Dix, NJ 29.30 Fort Monmouth, NJ 29.24 Fort Meade, MD 28.00 Crane, IN 27.66 Wallops Island, VA 26.32 Presidio of Monterey, CA 24.90

Page 68: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

16

RRAANNGGEESS AANNDD CCOOLLLLEECCTTIIVVEE TTRRAAIINNIINNGG SSUUBBGGRROOUUPP MMIILLIITTAARRYY VVAALLUUEE AANNAALLYYSSIISS

Section 1: Introduction The scope of military value analysis for the Ranges and Collective Training subgroup includes all DoD Active Component and Reserve installations and processes that support collective training capabilities to include Service unit, and interoperability (cross-service) and joint training functions, and test and evaluation (T&E) functions. This assessment includes training, test and evaluation (T&E) ranges, and training simulations centers. For purposes of MILVAL analysis of capability, Army and Air National Guard ranges are included in this analysis. As training and T&E are distinctly different functions, separate training and T&E military values were determined for each function. The Range and Collective Training military value analysis followed the E&T JCSG methodology and Military Value Scoring Plans approved by the ISG. Section 2: Military Value Score A numerical score by function and location is provided for each approved sub-function within the Range and Collective Training Subgroup purview:

Education and Training JCSG Range and Collective Training Subgroup

Training Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score Eglin AFB, FL 63.60 Fort Wainwright, AK 62.63 Facsfac San Diego, Ca 61.81 White Sands Missile Range, NM 59.72 Fort Bliss, TX 56.55 Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 52.40 Comnavmarianas, GU 50.18 Pacmisranfac Hawarea Barking Sands, HI 49.18 Navairwarcenwpndiv Pt Mugu, CA 48.85 Facsfac Vacapes Oceana, VA 48.59 CG MCB Campen, NC

46.73

Page 69: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

17

Education and Training JCSG

Range and Collective Training Subgroup Training (Continued) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score NAS Whidbey Island, WA 46.17 Fort Polk, LA 45.91 Dugway Proving Ground, UT 45.84 COMNAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake, CA

45.65

NAVSTAKAIRWARCEN Fallon, NV 45.43 NAVSTA Pearl Harbor, HI 45.42 CG MBB Camp Lejeune, NC 45.20 Fort Carson, CO 44.75 MCAS Yuma, AZ 44.17 Fort Lewis, WA 44.16 CG MAGTF TRNGCOM, CA 43.79 Nellis AFB, NV 43.57 Hill AFB. UT 42.96 COMNAVAIRWARCENACDIV, Patuxent River, MD

42.50

Luke AFB (Goldwater), AZ 41.70 Fort Hood, TX 41.69 FACSFAC Jacksonville, FL 41.68 Fort Knox, TN 41.01 NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV Keyport, WA 40.54 Fort Drum, NY 40.33 Edwards AFB, CA 40.30 Fort Bragg, NC 38.86 Fort Stewart, GA 38.42 Cannon AFB, NM 38.37 NTC and Fort Irwin, CA 38.31 NAS Key West, FL 36.41 Fort Rucker, AL 36.37 Fort A P Hill, VA 35.00 Fort Sill, OK 34.92 CG MCB Quantico, VA

34.69

Page 70: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

18

Education and Training JCSG Range and Collective Training Subgroup

Training (continued) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score NAS Pensacola, FL 34.03 Key Field, MS 33.98 Shaw AFB, SC 33.82 NAVSURFWARCEN, COASTSYSSTA Panama City, FL

33.47

Fort Huachuca, AZ 33.13 Buckley AFB, CO 33.05 Selfridge ANGB, MI 32.78 Fort Campbell, KY 32.49 Hancock Field AGS, NY 32.33 Fort Sam Houston, TX 32.25 Fort Riley, KS 32.18 MCAS Beaufort, SC 32.17 Hulman Regional APT AGS, IN 31.91 Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve, TX

31.69

Schofield Barracks, HI 31.67 Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 31.64 McConnell AFB, KS 31.16 Fort Eustis, VA 31.03 Fort Richardson, TX 30.77 CG MCAS Cherry Pt, NC 30.37 Fort Dix, NJ 29.11 Fort Leonard Wood, MO 28.83 COMNAVSPECWARGRU One, CA 28.71 COMSUBFORPAC Pearl Harbor, HI 28.63 NAS JRB Ft Worth, TX 28.56 Fort Benning, GA 28.41 CG MCB Hawaii 28.01 NAS Kingsville, TX 27.68 Seymour Johnson AFB, NC 27.51 Fort Gordon, GA 27.49 Fort McCoy, WI 27.09 Vandenberg AFB, CA 27.02

Page 71: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

19

Education and Training JCSG Range and Collective Training Subgroup

Training (continued) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score Mountain Home AFB, ID 26.77 Eielson AFB, AK 26.45 COMSTRKFIGHTWINGPAC Lemoore, CA 26.13 COMNAVSPECWARCEN, CA 25.96 Holloman AFB, NM 24.85 Atlantic City IAP AGS, NJ 24.02 Kirtland AFB, NM 23.57 MCMWTC Bridgeport, CT 23.49 Barksdale AFB, LA 23.33 NAS Whiting Field Milton, FL 23.23 Fort Jackson, SC 23.04 NAS Meridian, MS 22.94 COMSUBLANT Norfolk, VA 22.71 Lambert - St. Louis IAP AGS, MO 22.48 Harrisburg IAPAGS, PA 22.34 NAS Corpus Christi, TX 21.58 Moody AFB, GA 21.26 Redstone Arsenal, WA 20.95 Fort Smith Regional Apt AGS, AR 19.10 FCTCLANT, Dam Neck, VA 18.59 Mcchord AFB, WA 16.93 NAVSURFWARCENDIV Dahlgren, VA 16.75 Elmendorf AFB, AK 16.70 Tucson IAP AGS, AZ 16.70 NAS New Orleans ARS, LA 16.09 Klamath Falls IAP AGS, PA 15.14 Offutt AFB, NE 14.34 Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 14.12 Whiteman AFB, MO 13.84 DULUTH IAP AGS, MN 13.73 Laughlin AFB, TX 13.30 Vance AFB, OK 13.20 Columbus AFB, MS 13.14 Ellsworth AFB, SD 13.12

Page 72: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

20

Education and Training JCSG Range and Collective Training Subgroup

Training (continued) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score NAS Atlanta, GA 13.01 Tyndall AFB, FL 12.97 Langley AFB, VA 12.88 Great Falls IAP AGS, MT 12.55 Pope AFB, NC 12.00 Ellington Field AGS, TX 11.87 Boise Air Terminal AGS, ID 11.85 Dane County Regional, Truax Field AGS, WI 11.20 Hawthorne Army Depot, NV 10.91 Rome Laboratory, NY 10.87 Dyess AFB, TX 10.69 Des Moines IAP AGS, IA 10.49 Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS, OH 10.10 Sheppard AFB, TX 10.04 Beale AFB, CA 9.24 Sioux Gateway APT AGS, IA 9.23 Capital APT AGS, IL 9.22 Randolph AFB, TX 9.17 Joe Foss Field AGS, SD 9.16 Fort Wayne IAP AGS, IN 9.14 Dannelly Field AGS, AL 9.13 West Point Mil Reservation, NY 8.97 Anniston Army Depot, AL 8.80 Lincoln Map AGS, NE 8.72 Bradley IAP AGS, CT 8.72 Tulsa IAP AGS, OK 8.71 W. K. Kellogg APT AGS, MI 8.66 Barnes MPT AGS 8.63

Page 73: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

21

Education and Training JCSG Ranges and Collective Training Subgroup

Testing and Evaluation (T&E) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

EGLIN AFB 78.11 WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 72.89 COMNAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV_CHINA_LAKE 71.33 NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV_PT_MUGU_CA 69.67 HILL AFB 67.46 COMNAVAIRWARCENACDIV_PATUXENT_RI 65.46 EDWARDS AFB 63.56 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 59.15

YUMA PROVING GROUND 56.98 FORT HUACHUCA 55.40 NELLIS AFB 55.01 PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 53.29 NAVSURFWARCEN_COASTSYSSTA_PANAMA 52.94 NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA 52.73 NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 50.51 DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 50.23 REDSTONE ARSENAL 49.98 VANDENBERG AFB 49.05 FORT KNOX 47.75 LUKE AFB 47.53 FORT SILL 43.14 NAVSTKAIRWARCEN_FALLON_NV 42.63 FORT A P HILL 42.60 FORT BLISS 42.50 CG_MAGTF_TRNGCOM 41.94 NAS_KEY_WEST_FL 41.70

FORT WAINWRIGHT 41.18

MCAS_YUMA_AZ 41.00

Page 74: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group

22

Education and Training JCSG Ranges and Collective Training Subgroup

Testing and Evaluation (T&E)(Continued) Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Score

FORT RUCKER 40.65 MCAS_BEAUFORT_SC 40.03 FORT LEONARD WOOD 39.10 ELLSWORTH AFB 37.13 MCCONNELL AFB 35.96 NTC AND FORT IRWIN CA 35.39 FORT BRAGG 35.26 FORT HOOD 35.09 BUCKLEY AFB 33.93 COMSUBLANT_NORFOLK_VA 33.63 MCMWTC 30.27 CG_MCB_CAMPEN 30.20

HAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOT 28.71 Section 3: Results of Analysis

Training

The Range Training Sub-working Group, using Military Value analysis guidance as established by OSD, provided a means to rank-order ranges/range complexes/operating areas (OPAREAs) on the measure of merit and quantifiable attributes. Four DoD selection criteria were weighted based on relative importance in assessing the Military Value of training ranges/range complexes/OPAREAs. A range’s military value is predominantly its ability and capability to support the training mission. The cost was not the primary discriminator for the Range Training Sub-working Group in the calculation of Military Value. The Range Training Sub-working Group followed the Recruit and Train principle as defined in Policy Memorandum Two and Final Selection Criteria 1 through 4. Shear un-encroached space and the number of environments a range has available were major factors in the Military Value analysis. The Range Training Sub-working Group addressed 14 attributes across the 4 criteria resulting in a prioritized “1-n” list of training ranges/range complexes/OPAREAs.

Page 75: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HEADQUARTERS AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES

JOINT CROSS SERVICE GROUP

Volume VII FINAL

BRAC 2005 REPORT

_________________________________________________

Page 76: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-5

1. Civilian Personnel Offices. The Civilian Personnel Offices’ military value model is based the scoring plan presented at Appendix A. The specific data values used to run the model are shown in Appendix H. The results of the military value model are presented below in Table 1.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

North Central CPOC (Rock Island) 0.843 1 88 MSG/DPC (Wright-Patterson AFB) 0.806 2 DLA Civilian Personnel Office- Columbus 0.794 3 West CPOC (Ft. Huachuca) 0.764 4 78 MSG/DPC (Robins AFB) 0.740 5 DLA Civilian Personnel Office-New Cumberland 0.737 6 AFPC (Randolph AFB) 0.726 7 South Central CPOC (Redstone Arsenal) 0.725 8 Northeast CPOC (Aberdeen) 0.679 9 HRSC Southeast (Stennis) 0.672 10 Southwest CPOC (Ft. Riley) 0.664 11 72 MSG/DPC (Tinker AFB) 0.654 12 OO-ALC/DPC (Hill AFB) 0.607 13 HRSC East (Norfolk) 0.578 14 11WG/DPC (Bolling AFB) 0.560 15 DISA Civilian Personnel Division (MPS1) 0.555 16 Pacific CPOC (Ft. Richardson) 0.435 17 HRSC Southwest (San Diego) 0.363 18 DFAS Human Resources 0.362 19 HRSC Northeast (Philadelphia) 0.358 20 DODEA Human Resources Center 0.323 21 HRSC Pacific (Pearl Harbor) 0.307 22 HRSC Northwest (Silverdale) 0.276 23 WHS Personnel Services Division 0.226 24 DeCA Human Resource Operations Division 0.191 25

Table 1. Civilian Personnel Offices Military Value Results. 2. Major Administrative and Headquarters Activities (MAH). The scoring plan used to build and execute the model is presented in Appendix B. Appendix I provides a copy of the data values used to run the military value model and generate the results shown below in Table 2. In this table, an (I) at the beginning of the entity description designates an installation, an (A) designates an activity, an (AB) designates an activity from the Reserve and Recruiting Command Headquarters, and an (AJ) designates an activity from the Service Component Commands and Supporting Activity functions.

Page 77: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-6

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

(I)FORT BLISS 0.916106 1 (I)Hurlburt Field 0.904459 2 (I)Peterson AFB 0.898482 3 (I)Offutt AFB 0.897804 4 (I)FORT SILL 0.897530 5 (I)Cannon AFB 0.894840 6 (I)Robins AFB 0.894621 7 (I)Langley AFB 0.894364 8 (I)Fairchild AFB 0.891209 9 (I)Wright-Patterson AFB 0.890106 10 (I)Kirtland AFB 0.889335 11 (I)Charleston AFB 0.889139 12 (I)Eglin AFB 0.889118 13 (I)Davis-Monthan AFB 0.888693 14 (I)Ellsworth AFB 0.888462 15 (I)Francis E. Warren AFB 0.888071 16 (I)Tyndall AFB 0.888046 17 (I)Sheppard AFB 0.887698 18 (I)FORT SAM HOUSTON 0.887542 19 (I)Barksdale AFB 0.885399 20 (I)Naval Station Norfolk 0.884987 21 (I)MacDill AFB 0.884476 22 (I)Nellis AFB 0.884352 23 (I)Joint Reserve Base New Orleans 0.883714 24 (I)Lackland AFB 0.883065 25 (I)Hill AFB 0.882924 26 (I)Pope AFB 0.882312 27 (I)Naval Weapons Station Charleston 0.880734 28 (I)Little Rock AFB 0.880006 29 (I)FORT JACKSON 0.879598 30 (I)Minot AFB 0.879044 31 (I)FORT KNOX 0.878055 32 (I)McConnell AFB 0.877979 33 (I)Columbus AFB 0.877866 34 (I)Buckley AFB 0.877640 35 (I)Naval Station and Undersea Warfare Center Newport 0.877276 36 (I)McChord AFB 0.877039 37 (I)Malmstrom AFB 0.876998 38 (I)Grand Forks AFB 0.876953 39 (I)Naval Air Station Pensacola 0.875960 40 (I)Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA 0.875943 41 (I)Keesler AFB 0.875409 42

Page 78: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-7

(I)Maxwell AFB 0.874951 43 (I)Tinker AFB 0.874479 44 (I)Randolph AFB 0.873869 45 (I)FORT EUSTIS 0.873396 46 (I)Patrick AFB 0.872872 47 (I)REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.872540 48 (I)Naval Air Station Jacksonville 0.869268 49 (I)Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune 0.868848 50 (I)Naval Air Station Brunswick 0.866599 51 (I)Andrews AFB 0.865739 52 (I)Bolling AFB 0.865074 53 (I)FORT RILEY 0.864942 54 (I)Dyess AFB 0.864754 55 (I)Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg 0.864430 56 (I)FORT BELVOIR 0.864411 57 (I)FORT STEWART 0.863518 58 (I)FORT LEONARD WOOD 0.862508 59 (I)FORT BRAGG 0.861692 60 (I)FORT GORDON 0.861244 61 (I)Washington Navy Yard 0.861010 62 (I)Henderson Hall 0.860942 63 (I)FORT HOOD 0.860037 64 (I)Naval Air Station Meridian 0.859054 65 (I)FORT DRUM 0.857921 66 (I)Homestead ARS 0.857745 67 (I)Naval Support Activity Millington 0.857427 68 (I)FORT HUACHUCA 0.857220 69 (I)Naval Air Station Corpus Christi 0.856942 70 (I)FORT LEAVENWORTH 0.856342 71 (I)Seymour Johnson AFB 0.856158 72 (I)Scott AFB 0.855840 73 (I)Anacostia Annex 0.854954 74 (I)Naval Research Laboratory 0.854777 75 (I)Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point 0.854704 76 (I)Naval Support Activity Norfolk 0.854401 77 (I)Marine Corps Base Quantico 0.854218 78 (I)Arlington Service Center 0.853531 79 (I)Hickam AFB 0.852121 80 (I)Elmendorf AFB 0.852067 81 (I)FORT MYER 0.850883 82 (I)NAVSUPPACT INDIAN HEAD 0.849596 83 (I)March ARB 0.849568 84 (I)FORT CARSON 0.849489 85 (I)Shaw AFB 0.849476 86 (I)Saufley Field 0.849031 87

Page 79: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-8

(I)NAVSTA ANNAPOLIS 0.849000 88 (I)Brooks City-Base 0.848949 89 (I)FORT RUCKER 0.848640 90 (I)Marine Corps Air Station Miramar 0.846676 91 (I)FORT DETRICK 0.845373 92 (I)FORT WAINWRIGHT 0.845009 93 (I)FORT MEADE 0.844590 94 (I)Eielson AFB 0.843969 95 (I)FORT LEE 0.843201 96 (I)Naval Air Station North Island 0.842766 97 (I)FORT BENNING 0.842497 98 (I)Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth 0.842196 99 (I)Naval Air Station Whiting Field 0.841333 100 (I)Vandenberg AFB 0.840607 101 (I)Marine Corps Base Hawaii Kaneohe 0.839421 102 (I)Vance AFB 0.838288 103 (I)FORT MONROE 0.838263 104 (I)FORT MCNAIR 0.837711 105 (I)McGuire AFB 0.837355 106 (I)Naval Station San Diego 0.834858 107 (I)FORT MCPHERSON 0.834280 108 (I)National Naval Medical Center Bethesda 0.834077 109 (I)Naval Air Station Key West 0.834073 110 (I)Marine Corps Support Activity Kansas City 0.834021 111 (I)WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER 0.833714 112 (I)Naval Submarine Support Base Kings Bay 0.833382 113 (I)FORT LEWIS 0.833013 114 (I)FORT RICHARDSON 0.832621 115 (I)Marine Corps Base Hawaii Camp Smith 0.831913 116 (I)Army National Guard Readiness Center 0.831220 117 (I)Naval Station Pearl Harbor 0.830818 118 (I)Luke AFB 0.828890 119 (I)CARLISLE BARRACKS 0.827509 120 (I)Beale AFB 0.827114 121 (I)FORT POLK 0.819481 122 (I)Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort 0.819057 123 (I)SCHOFIELD BARRACKS 0.816340 124 (I)Mountain Home AFB 0.816236 125 (I)Potomac Annex, Washington DC 0.816066 126 (I)FORT SHAFTER 0.814127 127 (I)ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.811987 128 (I)FORT MCCOY 0.807143 129 (I)Travis AFB 0.799278 130 (I)Naval Amphibious Base Coronado 0.790840 131 (I)FORT GILLEM 0.786709 132

Page 80: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-9

(I)FORT HAMILTON 0.783659 133 (I)NAVSUPPACT DAHLGREN 0.783487 134 (I)FORT MONMOUTH 0.781758 135 (I)FORT CAMPBELL 0.775120 136 (I)FORT DIX 0.769979 137 (I)Altus AFB 0.765887 138 (I)Naval Air Station Patuxent River Webster Field 0.765141 139 (I)Whiteman AFB 0.764781 140 (I)Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst 0.762298 141 (I)Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove 0.761900 142 (I)Naval Air Station Whidbey Island 0.761821 143 (I)Dover AFB 0.760977 144 (I)FORT A P HILL 0.759834 145 (I)Naval Air Station Patuxent River 0.758719 146 (I)Naval Station Everett 0.737483 147 (I)Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton 0.727259 148 (I)Naval Submarine Base Bangor 0.717246 149 (I)Naval Air Station Point Mugu 0.690660 150 (A)CAA 0.573033 151 (A)DIA CAF 0.541384 152 (A)JCS CAF 0.541384 153 (A)Navy CAF 0.541384 154 (A)NETC 0.541384 155 (A)NETPDTC 0.541384 156 (A)AF Review Boards Agency 0.539325 157 (A)CO HQBN HQMC (Henderson Hall) 0.539325 158 (A)MEDIA CTR WASHINGTON DC 0.539325 159 (A)NAVAL LEGAL SERVICE OFFICE NORTH CENTRAL 0.539325 160 (A)NAVAL LEGAL SERVICES COMMAND 0.539325 161 (A)OCHR 0.539325 162 (A)PEO Soldier 0.539325 163 (A)TRIAL SERVICE OFFICE NORTHEAST 0.539325 164 (AB)COMMARFORRES NSA NOLA, New Orleans LA 0.539325 165 (AB)COMNAVAIRRESFOR NSA NOLA (sub of above) 0.539325 166 (AB)COMNAVCRUITCMD 0.539325 167 (AB)COMNAVCRUITCMD NSA NOLA (sub of above) 0.539325 168 (AB)COMNAVRESFOR NSA NOLA 0.539325 169 (AB)US Army Accessions Command HQ (USAAC) 0.539325 170 (AB)USAF Recruiting Service (HQ AF Recruiting SVC) 0.539325 171 (AJ)PACOM PACAF 0.539325 172 (AJ)FORSCOM 0.535848 173 (A)AF Office of Special Investigations 0.533079 174 (A)6MLMC 0.526302 175 (A)COMNAVFACENGCOM 0.520917 176 (AB)USAF Reserve Command (USAFRES) 0.519156 177

Page 81: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-10

(AB)US Army Recruiting Cmd 0.515376 178 (A)Acquisition Support Center (ASC) 0.497869 179 (A)NCIS 0.497809 180 (A)Program Mgr for Chemical Demilitarization 0.494558 181 (A)NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER 0.492634 182 (AJ)PACOM USPACFLT 0.491693 183 (AJ)PACOM USARPAC 0.484799 184 (A)11th Wing 0.483401 185 (A)PWC WASH DC 0.483215 186 (A)NAVAL DISTRICT WASH DC 0.482047 187 (A)US Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity 0.481124 188 (AJ)TRADOC 0.474208 189 (AB)US Army Reserve Command (USARC) 0.465001 190 (A)Wash HQ Services CAF 0.440260 191 (A)HQMC 0.438202 192 (A)MDW 0.438202 193 (A)DCAA 0.425281 194 (AB)US Army Cadet Cmd 0.410296 195 (A)Air Force CAF 0.406553 196 (A)Army CCF 0.406553 197 (A)DTRA 0.405251 198 (A)Soldiers Magazine-Belvoir 0.405180 199 (A)AF Flight Standards Agency 0.404494 200 (A)AF Legal Services Agency 0.404494 201 (A)AF Medical Support Agency 0.404494 202 (A)AF/HC – Chaplain Service 0.404494 203 (A)AF/SG – Surgeon General 0.404494 204 (A)AFIP 0.404494 205 (A)AUDSVC 0.404494 206 (A)BD CPAC -MA, NE Region 0.404494 207 (A)BUMED, WASH DC 0.404494 208 (A)COMSC WASHINGTON DC 0.404494 209 (A)NAVSISA MECHANICSBURG PA 0.404494 210 (A)NAVSUPSYSCOM MECHANICSBURG PA 0.404494 211 (A)PEO EIS(STAMIS) 0.404494 212 (A)US ARMY INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COMMAND 0.404494 213 (A)USAMMDA 0.404494 214 (AB)COMMARFORCRUITCMD, Quantico, VA 0.404494 215 (A)DeCA 0.403999 216 (A)Developmental Test Command 0.400653 217 (A)USAMRIID 0.397131 218 (A)ACSIM 0.393249 219 (A)CID-Belvoir 0.386276 220 (A)Army Evaluation Center 0.384469 221

Page 82: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-11

(A)USA SAC 0.381946 222 (A)USA MMA 0.380582 223 (A)USA Force Mgmt Support Agency, HQ DA-GS 0.377575 224 (A)DLA 0.377205 225 (A)DISCO 0.373905 226 (A)SAF/US – Under Secretary of the AF 0.372448 227 (A)MARINE CORPS INSTITUTE (NEW) 0.372432 228 (A)Army Audit Agency 0.371990 229 (A)AF/JA – Judge Advocate General 0.371751 230 (A)USALSA 0.369586 231 (A)SPAWARSYSCEN, Charleston (NEW) 0.368049 232 (A)ASA(M&RA) 0.367484 233 (A)US Army Medical Research Institute for Chemical Defense 0.365510 234 (A)HQS USA MRMC (and subordinate commands) 0.365100 235 (A)NSWC HQ (AT WNY) 0.365040 236 (A)JMLFDC 0.364700 237 (AB)HQ ARNG (Army Natl Guard) 0.363228 238 (A)US Army Aberdeen Test Center 0.360723 239 (A)Communications & Electronics Command (CECOM) 0.359930 240 (A)US Army Research, Development and Engineering Command 0.359555 241 (A)USAMRAA 0.358069 242 (A)Edgewood Chemical & Biological Center 0.353246 243 (A)Army Contracting Agency 0.352701 244 (A)NAVSEASYSCOM WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC 0.351416 245 (A)US Army Environmental Center 0.350284 246 (A)US Army Ctr for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine 0.343374 247 (A)U. S. Army Research Laboratory - HQ 0.340102 248 (A)The Surgeon General Office (OTSG) 0.329669 249 (A)SECNAV WASH DC 0.329566 250 (A)ASA (I&E) 0.327649 251 (A)OEA 0.325443 252 (AJ)JFCOM/C4ISR Battle Center/JFL/JWC 0.311502 253 (A)OCPA 0.305962 254 (A)NSA CAF 0.305429 255 (A)NAVAIR SYSCOM HQ 0.296075 256 (A)Navy Hometown News 0.293966 257 (A)SAF/GC – General Counsel 0.293345 258 (AJ)SDDC-TEA 0.293067 259 (A)G-6 0.292114 260 (A)DUSA 0.292038 261 (A)AF/XO – Air and Space Operations 0.292033 262 (A)AF-CIO – HAF Chief Information Officer 0.291984 263 (A)CECOM (Acquisition Ctr) 0.291821 264

Page 83: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-12

(A)ASA (FM&C) 0.291476 265 (A)AF News Agency/Army & AF Hometown News 0.291462 266 (A)AFIS 0.291362 267 (A)Ofc of the JAG (OTJAG) 0.291328 268 (A)G-8 0.291178 269 (A)AFSAA - AF Studies and Analysis Agency 0.290729 270 (A)PFPA 0.290512 271 (A)DTSA 0.290357 272 (A)OCAR 0.289929 273 (A)JAG School 0.289786 274 (A)DARPA 0.289164 275 (A)DHRA 0.287253 276 (A)OASA (Alt) 0.276646 277 (A)AFCEE 0.274720 278 (A)CIFA 0.273153 279 (A)DOHA 0.271923 280 (A)NAWC PATUXENT RIVER MD 0.271219 281 (A)SAF/AA – Admin Asst to the Secretary 0.265571 282 (A)G-3 0.265290 283 (A)PEO STRICOM 0.260909 284 (AB)USAF Reserve Command Reserve Recruiting Service, 0.260669 285 (A)DCMS 0.257829 286 (A)G-1 0.256200 287 (A)AMC 0.254981 288 (A)Office of the Admin Ass't to the Army (aka SAAA) 0.253912 289 (A)HQ IMA 0.252089 290 (A)WHS 0.249914 291 (A)SAF/PA – Public Affairs 0.238116 292 (A)SAF/SB – Small & Disadvantaged Business 0.238100 293 (A)AF/XI – Warfighting Integration 0.237450 294 (A)SAF/IA – International Affairs 0.237118 295 (A)OSD 0.234229 296 (AB)HQ Air National Guard (ANG) 0.227358 297 (A)DCMA 0.219688 298 (A)HQ SMDC 0.218208 299 (A)HRC 0.216936 300 (A)OPNAV 0.209306 301 (A)SAF/IE – Installations Environment and Logistics 0.207539 302 (A)NETCOM 0.201310 303 (A)SAF/AQ - Acquisition 0.197521 304 (A)SAF/AG – Auditor General 0.197312 305 (A)DISA 0.196988 306 (A)DISC4 JTRS JPO 0.188239 307 (A)TMA 0.164090 308 (A)AF Personnel Operations Agency 0.158570 309

Page 84: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-13

(A)PEO Biological Defense 0.157701 310 (A)NMCRS 0.157603 311 (A)AF/HO - Historian 0.157277 312 (A)SAF/FM – Financial Management and Comptroller 0.156783 313 (A)DLSA 0.156473 314 (A)DPMO 0.156181 315 (A)NAVIPO WASH DC 0.155633 316 (A)COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS 0.155615 317 (A)DSCA 0.155472 318 (A)HQ ATEC 0.153650 319 (AB)HQ NGB (National Guard Bureau – overseeing Air Force and Army) 0.153333 320 (A)DODEA 0.153243 321 (A)Army Research Office 0.152528 322 (A)NAV SSP (NEW) 0.151736 323 (A)SDDC (formerly MTMC) 0.150176 324 (AJ)SOUTHCOM HQ 0.148419 325 (A)Navy Systems Management Activity (NSMA) - New 0.143747 326 (A)Army-CSA 0.143717 327 (A)DOD IG 0.142296 328 (A)MDA 0.142236 329 (A)AF/DP - Personnel 0.136565 330 (A)OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.124907 331 (A)DFAS 0.122673 332 (A)AF/IL – Installation and Logistics 0.113528 333 (A)DSS 0.112188 334

Table 2. MAH Military Value Results. 3. Mobilization. The scoring plan used for the Mobilization function is provided in Appendix C. Appendix J provides a copy of the data values used to run the military value model.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

FT BENNING 0.552 1 FT LEWIS 0.545 2 FT BRAGG 0.497 3 FT HOOD 0.461 4 FT STEWART 0.457 5 FT MCCOY 0.439 6 FT DIX 0.435 7 FT KNOX 0.434 8 CG_MCB_CAMPEN 0.429 9 FT CARSON 0.369 10 FT BLISS 0.367 11

Page 85: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-14

FT DRUM 0.361 12 CG_MCB_CAMP_LEJEUNE_NC 0.343 13 FT RILEY 0.339 14 FT SILL 0.338 15 FT POLK 0.333 16 FT CAMPBELL 0.323 17 Eglin AFB 0.322 18 FT JACKSON 0.310 19 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.300 20 FT LEE 0.293 21 SUBASE_BANGOR_WA 0.276 22 FT LEONARD WOOD 0.276 23 NAS_JACKSONVILLE_FL 0.259 24 McGuire AFB 0.250 25 FT SAM HOUSTON 0.248 26 Hill AFB 0.240 27 FT EUSTIS 0.239 28 NAVSTA_NORFOLK_VA 0.239 29 FT RUCKER 0.236 30 CBC_GULFPORT_MS 0.233 31 Robins AFB 0.233 32 Seymour Johnson AFB 0.219 33 Travis AFB 0.209 34 NAS_PENSACOLA_FL 0.202 35 NAVBASE_VENTURA_CTY_PT_MUGU_CA 0.195 36 FT RICHARDSON 0.194 37 Davis-Monthan AFB 0.191 38 March ARB 0.190 39 Scott AFB 0.190 40 FT HUACHUCA 0.188 41 Tinker AFB 0.186 42 Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS 0.185 43 Westover ARB 0.184 44 SCHOFIELD BARRACKS 0.182 45 Wright-Patterson AFB 0.181 46 NAS_JRB_FT_WORTH_TX 0.178 47 NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO_CA 0.172 48 NAS_JRB_NEW_ORLEANS_LA 0.172 49 Holloman AFB 0.171 50 Whiteman AFB 0.160 51 Kirtland AFB 0.157 52 COMNAVDIST_WASHINGTON_DC 0.147 53 Niagara Falls IAP ARS 0.146 54 Grissom ARB 0.144 55 SUBASE_NEW_LONDON_CT 0.144 56

Page 86: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-15

Barksdale AFB 0.143 57 Minot AFB 0.132 58 NAS_JRB_WILLOW_GROVE_PA 0.132 59 NAVSUPPACT_MID_SOUTH_MILLINGTON_TN 0.131 60 Elmendorf AFB 0.126 61 Homestead ARS 0.122 62 Jackson IAP AGS 0.120 63 NAVSTA_PEARL_HARBOR_HI 0.117 64 NAVSTA_GREAT_LAKES_IL 0.094 65 FT BUCHANAN 0.092 66

Table 3. Mobilization Military Value Results. 4. Military Personnel Centers. The military value model is based on the scoring plan presented in Appendix D. The data used to execute the military value model is shown at Appendix K. The results of the military value model are shown below in Table 4.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

NAVPERSCOM 0.962 1 AFPC 0.754 2 MC PERSCOM 0.586 3 EPMAC 0.563 4 NAVRESPERCEN 0.563 5 ARPC 0.130 6 HRC INDIANAPOLIS 0.098 7 HRC ST LOUIS 0.097 8 MC MOBCOM 0.094 9 HRC ALEXANDRIA 0.068 10

Table 4. Military Personnel Centers Military Value Results. 5. Correctional Facilities. The corrections model scoring plan is at Appendix E. The data used to run the model is in Appendix L. The results of the military value model are shown below in Table 5.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

FORT LEAVENWORTH 0.587 1 CG_MCAS_MIRAMAR_CA 0.563 2 WPNSTA_CHARLESTON_SC 0.433 3 Lackland AFB 0.432 4 FORT KNOX 0.402 5 SUBASE_BANGOR_WA 0.400 6

Page 87: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-16

NAVBRIG_NORFOLK_VA 0.386 7 Edwards AFB 0.372 8 NAS_PENSACOLA_FL 0.356 9 CG_MCB_CAMP_LEJEUNE_NC 0.342 10 CG_MCB_CAMPEN 0.338 11 FORT SILL 0.337 12 FORT LEWIS 0.337 13 CG_MCB_QUANTICO_VA 0.293 14 Kirtland AFB 0.289 15 NAVSTA_PEARL_HARBOR_HI 0.230 16 NAS_JACKSONVILLE_FL 0.185 17

Table 5. Correctional Facilities Military Value Results. 6. DFAS. The DFAS scoring plan is in Appendix F. Appendix M provides details on values of the data elements. The results of the military value model are shown in Table 6 below.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

Rock Island 0.846 1 Pensacola Saufley Field 0.805 2 Denver 0.803 3 Norfolk Naval Station 0.787 4 Lawton 0.787 5 Pensacola Naval Air Station 0.720 6 Columbus 0.688 7 Omaha 0.673 8 Indianapolis 0.651 9 Dayton 0.625 10 St Louis 0.612 11 Cleveland 0.587 12 San Antonio 0.586 13 San Diego 0.569 14 Pacific Ford Island 0.569 15 Patuxent River 0.565 16 Limestone 0.548 17 Charleston 0.546 18 Rome 0.542 19 Orlando 0.540 20 Lexington 0.532 21 Kansas City 0.451 22 Seaside 0.433 23 San Bernardino 0.429 24 Arlington 0.313 25

Page 88: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-17

Oakland 0.243 26

Table 6. DFAS Military Value Results. 7. Installation Management. The installation management scoring plan is presented in Appendix G. Appendix N provides a copy of the data used to execute the military value model. The military value results are shown below in Table 7.

Alternative

Military Value Score Rank

Walter Reed Medical Center 0.556 1 Ft. Bragg 0.530 2 NAVSTA Pearl Harbor 0.410 3 NAVSTA Norfolk 0.402 4 COMNAVDIST Washington D.C. 0.378 5 Bolling AFB 0.357 6 Lackland AFB 0.355 7 Ft. Lewis 0.350 8 Schofield Barracks 0.340 9 Ft. Eustis 0.304 10 MCB Quantico 0.291 11 Peterson AFB 0.290 12 Keesler AFB 0.285 13 MCB Hawaii Kaneohe 0.262 14 Ft. Carson 0.262 15 Ft. Belvoir 0.261 16 Ft. Shafter 0.260 17 Aberdeen Proving Ground 0.251 18 Ft. Meade 0.248 19 Langley AFB 0.235 20 Schriever AFB 0.234 21 NAS Patuxent River 0.233 22 Naval Support Act Mechanicsburg 0.230 23 Ft. Sam Houston 0.230 24 USAF Academy 0.228 25 CBC Gulfport 0.224 26 Elmendorf AFB 0.222 27 Hickam AFB 0.220 28 Randolph AFB 0.218 29 Nat Naval Med Center Bethesda 0.217 30 Andrews AFB 0.214 31 Ft. Dix 0.211 32 Dover AFB 0.208 33 Ft. Richardson 0.208 34 DOBBINS ARB 0.206 35

Page 89: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

HSA-JCSG-D-05-326

I-18

McGuire AFB 0.205 36 NAVWPNSTA Charleston 0.198 37 Charleston AFB 0.197 38 McChord AFB 0.196 39 Ft. Monmouth 0.193 40 Pope AFB 0.192 41 NAVMEDCEN PORTSMOUTH 0.191 42 Brooks-City Base 0.191 43 Ft. McNair/Fort Myer 0.188 44 NAS Oceana 0.186 45 COMNAVMARIANAS_GU 0.178 46 Cheyenne Mountain AFS 0.177 47 NAVSHIPYD Norfolk 0.174 48 NAVSUPPACT Norfolk 0.170 49 Andersen AFB 0.166 50 NAVPHIBASE Little Creek 0.165 51 Letterkenny Army Depot 0.165 52 NAS ATLANTA 0.164 53 Ft. Detrick 0.16 54 NAVAIRENGSTA Lakehurst 0.153 55 COMDR Camp Allen Norfolk 0.144 56 CO HQBN HQMC Henderson Hall 0.142 57 Adelphi Laboratory Center 0.141 58 Marine Corps Barracks 8th & I 0.138 59 Carlisle Barracks 0.131 60 WPNSTA Yorktown 0.13 61 NAVSTA Pascagoula 0.125 62 Ft. Monroe 0.123 63 WPNSTA Earle Colts Neck 0.116 64 Ft. A.P. Hill 0.112 65

Table 7. Installation Management Military Value Results.

Section 3: Application of Military Value The results from military value as presented above represent our best efforts at a quantitative assessment reflected by the data at the time of publication of this report. As mentioned in the previous section, we encountered data challenges. When resolving the data issues, we always strove for accurate and certified data. When achieving that standard was not possible, we treated data reported form the field, whose certification had not caught up in the process, as more accurate than any judgment based data we could develop. We continued to follow-up on certification of data that has not yet been certified. Despite our best efforts, we were not able to obtain data from the field for all of our model needs; however, the vast majority of our data was certified. In cases where we

Page 90: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Industrial Joint Cross Service Group

Final Report

May 10, 2005

Page 91: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Industrial Joint Cross Service Group

Military Value Report

April 22, 2005

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 92: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Section 1: Introduction

Three sub-groups were established based upon the three main industrial activities

to be analyzed by the Industrial Joint Cross Service Group (IJCSG), Maintenance,

Munitions and Armaments, and Ship Overhaul and Repair. Each subgroup is headed by a

principal member of the IJSCG, and who is also a subject matter expert. Each of those

subgroups, in turn, are composed of subject matter experts from each Service, the joint

staff and supported, as necessary, by contract personnel.

Each of the sub groups developed an identification of the work being performed and

listed as functions and sub-functions. Measurable characteristics, or attributes, were then

developed for each function and keyed to the Selection Criteria for Closing and Realigning

Military Installations Inside the United States. A numerical approach, or metrics, for

measuring attributes were then developed along with specific data call questions. Each step

has a weighted value based on a 0-100 point scale.

The functions and subordinate functions identified by the IJCSG sub groups as

necessary to assess military value is as follows:

MUNITIONS AND ARMAMENTS

The IJCSG Subgroup, Munitions and Armaments, is responsible for assessment of the

entire life cycle of munitions (except Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation

(RDT&E)) and the manufacturing/production of armaments within the government

owned industrial base. This group evaluated the military value of installations based on

these key functions.

• Munitions Production

• Munitions Maintenance

• Munitions Storage and Distribution

• Munitions Demilitarization

• Armaments Manufacturing/Production

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 93: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

MAINTENANCE The Maintenance Subgroup assessed military value for both:

• Depot maintenance, and

• Combat field support/intermediate maintenance

Each function was assessed at the commodity group level. The maintenance commodity

group level approach to military value ensures that all of the maintenance work performed

at both depot and combat field support/intermediate maintenance activities is considered in

the analysis. Each commodity group is the same as defined in the Industrial JCSG BRAC

Capacity Analysis Report.

Assessing military value at the commodity level will allow evaluations of common

capabilities across all of the Services. For example, locations that provide combat vehicle

maintenance and fighter aircraft maintenance will be evaluated as separate groups. All

weapon systems/equipment are integral to the joint warfighting effort. Therefore,

comparing military value between different commodities is not relevant. For example,

military value for combat vehicle maintenance cannot be determined as being more or less

important than military value for fighter aircraft maintenance.

SHIP OVERHAUL AND REPAIR The Ship Overhaul and Repair Subgroup determined there were two subordinate

functions for analysis:

• Depot level, and

• Intermediate level.

Because these subordinate functions for ship repair are similar, but require different

levels of skills, resources, and mission, some identical attributes, metrics and questions

are used in each subordinate function.

For the capacity analysis, commodities were prescribed for data collection.

That approach allows comparison of capabilities and capacities with non-ship

maintenance activities. For the military value analysis however, data were collected for

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 94: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

functions at the activity level. This was less burdensome for the activities and yields

sufficient data for an accurate ship overhaul and repair military value analysis.

The attributes and metrics for each criterion were carefully selected and weighted to

give appropriate value, but not excessive value to any one criterion, attribute, metric or

question.

The following tables contain the results of the military value analysis by each of the

subgroups. The specific attributes, metrics, questions, rationale and score plan for each

of the three subgroups is contained in the approved Industrial Joint Cross Service Group

Military Value Analysis Plan.

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 95: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Section 2: Military Value Scores

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 96: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

Section 3: Issues Impacting Analysis There are no significant issues impacting analysis.

Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 97: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT

Small Arms/Personal Weapons 0.5717

Engines/Transmissions 0.5517

Combat Vehicles 0.4969

Other Components 0.4907

Construction Equipment 0.4825

Generators 0.4578

Ground Support Equipment 0.4327

Tactical Vehicles 0.3617

Aircraft Other Components 0.3167

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1684

Other 0.1625

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.1581

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 1 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 98: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT

Material Handling 0.1536

Aircraft Rotary 0.1179

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0380

Conventional Weapons 0.0287

Tactical Missiles 0.0277

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 2 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 99: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: CO_MCLB_ALBANY_GA

Amphibious Vehicles 0.6713

Wire 0.6272

TMDE 0.5944

Small Arms/Personal Weapons 0.5258

PowerTrain Components 0.5234

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.5175

Generators 0.5065

Electro-Optics/Night Vision/FLIR 0.5046

Construction Equipment 0.4933

Other Equipment 0.4880

Tactical Vehicles 0.4582

Material Handling 0.4511

Radio 0.4489

Engines/Transmissions 0.4399

Software Support Equipment 0.4194

Computers 0.4161

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 3 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 100: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Radar 0.4072

Other Components 0.3954

Starters/Alternators/Generators 0.3901

Combat Vehicles 0.3882

Conventional Weapons 0.3068

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1436

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 4 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 101: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: CO_MCLB_BARSTOW_CA

Amphibious Vehicles 0.5406

Generators 0.4415

Radar 0.4348

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.4263

Engines/Transmissions 0.4254

Small Arms/Personal Weapons 0.4137

Construction Equipment 0.4056

TMDE 0.3835

Tactical Vehicles 0.3830

Other Equipment 0.3807

Other Components 0.3589

Electro-Optics/Night Vision/FLIR 0.3525

Combat Vehicles 0.3430

PowerTrain Components 0.3425

Radio 0.3402

Starters/Alternators/Generators 0.3348

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 5 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 102: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Tactical Missiles 0.3087

Material Handling 0.2943

Aircraft Other Components 0.2900

Other 0.2827

Ground Support Equipment 0.2671

Aircraft Rotary 0.2581

Strategic Missiles 0.2492

Conventional Weapons 0.2362

Wire 0.1802

Armament & Structural Components 0.1472

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1217

Activity: COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD

Ground Support Equipment 0.2534

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 6 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 103: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: CORPUS CHRISTI ARMY DEPOT

Aircraft Engine Turboprop/Turboshaft 0.5408

Aircraft Dynamic Components 0.5333

Aircraft Rotary 0.4718

Aircraft Other Components 0.4197

Aircraft Pneumatic Components 0.4059

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.3919

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.3739

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.3678

Aircraft Structural Components 0.3271

Engine Exchangeables/Components 0.3152

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.2665

Aircraft Landing Gear Components 0.2401

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1259

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 7 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 104: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: Davis-Monthan AFB

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.5023

Aircraft Other Components 0.4403

Other 0.4239

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1221

Activity: DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER RICHMOND

Industrial Plant Equipment (IPE) 0.3117

Activity: FORT SILL

Starters/Alternators/Generators 0.3574

PowerTrain Components 0.3161

Radio 0.2971

Engines/Transmissions 0.2868

Computers 0.2433

Other Components 0.1760

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.0959

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 8 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 105: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: Hill AFB

Software Weapon System 0.6539

Strategic Missiles 0.6432

Calibration 0.6117

APUs/GTEs/ATS/SPS/GTCs 0.5731

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.5446

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.5317

Aircraft Pneumatic Components 0.5130

Software Support Equipment 0.5077

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.5048

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.4835

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.4683

Ground Support Equipment 0.4559

Aircraft Other Components 0.4482

Aircraft Landing Gear Components 0.4466

Aircraft Dynamic Components 0.4458

Aircraft Structural Components 0.4155

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 9 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 106: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Aircraft Ordnance Equipment Components 0.4087

Other 0.3654

Tactical Missiles 0.2630

Armament & Structural Components 0.1743

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1189

Activity: Lackland AFB

Crypto 0.4042

Computers 0.3350

Radio 0.3142

Other 0.1428

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.1373

Activity: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT

Tactical Vehicles 0.4683

Generators 0.4461

Tactical Missiles 0.4416

Other Equipment 0.3382

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1615

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 10 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 107: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NADEP_JACKSONVILLE_FL_DET_CECIL_FIELD

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.2644

Aircraft Other 0.1939

Activity: NADEP_JACKSONVILLE_FL_DET_JACKSONVILLE

Aircraft Rotary 0.2505

Aircraft Other 0.1748

Activity: NADEP_JACKSONVILLE_FL_DET_MAYPORT

Aircraft Rotary 0.2393

Aircraft Other 0.1564

Activity: NADEP_JACKSONVILLE_FL_DET_NORFOLK

Aircraft Rotary 0.4053

Aircraft Other 0.2886

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.2801

Activity: NADEP_JACKSONVILLE_FL_DET_OCEANA

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.2005

Aircraft Other 0.1524

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 11 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 108: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NADEP_NORTH_ISLAND_CA_DET_CAMP_PENDLETON

Aircraft Rotary 0.1910

Aircraft Other 0.1270

Activity: NADEP_NORTH_ISLAND_CA_DET_LEMOORE

Aircraft Other 0.1495

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.1485

Activity: NADEP_NORTH_ISLAND_CA_DET_MIRAMAR

Aircraft Other 0.1446

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.1121

Activity: NADEP_NORTH_ISLAND_CA_DET_NORTH_ISLAND

Aircraft Rotary 0.2242

Aircraft Other 0.1580

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 12 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 109: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NAVAIRDEPOT_CHERRY_PT_NC

APUs/GTEs/ATS/SPS/GTCs 0.7170

Aircraft VSTOL 0.6916

Aircraft Engine Turboprop/Turboshaft 0.6675

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.6106

Aircraft Dynamic Components 0.6020

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.5996

Aircraft Engine Turbofan/TurboJet Augmented 0.5972

Aircraft Pneumatic Components 0.5646

Aircraft Rotary 0.5608

Aircraft Other 0.5388

Aircraft Structural Components 0.5146

Engine Exchangeables/Components 0.5068

Other 0.5050

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.5029

Aircraft Other Components 0.4901

Aircraft Landing Gear Components 0.4574

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 13 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 110: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Calibration 0.4520

Ground Support Equipment 0.4029

Aircraft Ordnance Equipment Components 0.3970

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.2529

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.2121

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1729

Other Engines 0.1696

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 14 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 111: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NAVAIRDEPOT_JACKSONVILLE_FL

Aircraft Other Components 0.6316

Aircraft Other 0.5600

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.5223

Aircraft Pneumatic Components 0.5131

Aircraft Engine Turbofan/TurboJet Augmented 0.5096

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.4890

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.4748

Calibration 0.4693

Aircraft Ordnance Equipment Components 0.4273

Aircraft Landing Gear Components 0.4167

Other 0.4094

Aircraft Structural Components 0.3811

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.3809

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1797

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.1392

Aircraft Engine Turboprop/Turbofan Bypass 0.1296

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 15 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 112: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NAVAIRDEPOT_NORTH_ISLAND_CA

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.5658

Aircraft Other Components 0.5195

Aircraft Other 0.5120

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.5102

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.5030

Calibration 0.4764

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.4751

Aircraft Rotary 0.4605

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.4586

Other Engines 0.4412

Aircraft Landing Gear Components 0.3903

Aircraft Structural Components 0.3789

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3722

Ground Support Equipment 0.3472

Aircraft Ordnance Equipment Components 0.3347

Other 0.2747

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 16 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 113: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1642

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_BEAUFORT_SC

Ground Support Equipment 0.4113

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_CAMP_LEJEUNE_NC

Ground Support Equipment 0.3897

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_CHERRY_PT_NC

Ground Support Equipment 0.4522

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_JRB_FORT_WORTH_TX

Ground Support Equipment 0.3729

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_MAYPORT_FL

Ground Support Equipment 0.3388

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_NEW_ORLEANS_LA

Ground Support Equipment 0.4400

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_NEWPORT_NEWS_SHIPYARD_VA

Ground Support Equipment 0.3929

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_NORTH_ISLAND_CA

Ground Support Equipment 0.4814

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 17 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 114: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NAVAIRSEFAC_SOLOMONS_MD

Ground Support Equipment 0.5406

Activity: NAVAIRWARCENACDIV_LAKEHURST_NJ

Other 0.3347

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1246

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.0751

Activity: NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN

Electronic Warfare 0.6220

Electro-Optics/Night Vision/FLIR 0.5645

Radar 0.5263

Small Arms/Personal Weapons 0.5203

Computers 0.4907

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.4314

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.4252

Other 0.3871

Conventional Weapons 0.3220

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1777

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 18 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 115: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA

Conventional Weapons 0.5690

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1756

Activity: NAVWPNSTA_SEAL_BEACH_CA

Material Handling 0.4670

Radar 0.3240

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.3165

Radio 0.2888

Tactical Missiles 0.2616

Other Components 0.2590

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1064

Activity: NAWCAD_LAKEHURST_DET_MAYPORT_FL

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3182

Other 0.1917

Activity: NAWCAD_LAKEHURST_DET_NORFOLK_VA

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3872

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 19 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 116: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: Palmdale - Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Northrup Grumman

Aircraft Bomber 0.3865

Aircraft Other 0.3121

Activity: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL

Other 0.3588

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 20 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 117: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT

Construction Equipment 0.6190

Starters/Alternators/Generators 0.5527

Engines/Transmissions 0.4569

PowerTrain Components 0.4483

Tactical Vehicles 0.3935

Combat Vehicles 0.3806

Other 0.3785

Tactical Missiles 0.3624

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3156

Armament & Structural Components 0.1830

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1299

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.1130

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 21 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 118: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: Robins AFB

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.6404

Software Weapon System 0.6132

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.5268

Aircraft Fighter/Attack 0.5043

Software Support Equipment 0.4964

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.4800

Aircraft Dynamic Components 0.4578

Wire 0.4358

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.4257

Aircraft Other Components 0.4165

Aircraft Structural Components 0.3869

Other Components 0.3277

Aircraft Hydraulic Components 0.2833

Tactical Missiles 0.2668

Aircraft Ordnance Equipment Components 0.2641

Radar 0.1678

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 22 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 119: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Computers 0.1381

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1311

Engine Exchangeables/Components 0.1235

Activity: ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL

Other Equipment 0.3201

Other 0.2948

Combat Vehicles 0.2805

Tactical Vehicles 0.2561

Activity: SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.3987

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 23 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 120: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: SPAWARSYSCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA

Navigational Aids 0.4971

Crypto 0.3842

Radio 0.3691

Calibration 0.3585

Computers 0.3345

Electronic Warfare 0.3183

Radar 0.3013

TMDE 0.2892

Other 0.2558

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.2377

Software Support Equipment 0.2210

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0467

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 24 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 121: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: Tinker AFB

Aircraft Engine Turbofan/TurboJet Augmented 0.6701

Aircraft Bomber 0.6545

Software Weapon System 0.5799

Aircraft Other 0.5103

Aircraft Pneumatic Components 0.5022

Software Support Equipment 0.4965

Engine Exchangeables/Components 0.4945

Aircraft Other Components 0.4750

Aircraft Cargo/Tanker 0.4674

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.4403

Aircraft Instruments Components 0.4289

Other Engines 0.4199

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3449

Aircraft Structural Components 0.3367

Aircraft Engine Turboprop/Turbofan Bypass 0.1948

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1698

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 25 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 122: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Activity: TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT

Crypto 0.7377

Radio 0.6837

Electronic Components (non-airborne) 0.6377

Navigational Aids 0.5929

Generators 0.5842

Wire 0.5785

Electronic Warfare 0.5548

Computers 0.5297

Electro-Optics/Night Vision/FLIR 0.5207

TMDE 0.5125

Radar 0.4963

Ground Support Equipment 0.4947

Aircraft Avionics/Electronics Components 0.4544

Tactical Missiles 0.3932

Other 0.3857

Tactical Vehicles 0.3763

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 26 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 123: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance

Depot Fleet/Field Support 0.3367

Fire Control Systems & Components 0.2443

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1914

Activity: TOOELE ARMY DEPOT

Other 0.3521

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 27 of 27 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 124: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 1 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 125: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Altus AFB

Aircraft 0.2516

Aircraft Components 0.2469

Aircraft Engines 0.2368

Ground Vehicles 0.1916

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1118

Support Equipment 0.0763

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0521

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0501

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0501

Software 0.0501

Other Commodity 0.0487

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 2 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 126: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Andersen AFB

Aircraft Components 0.1757

Aircraft 0.1672

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0637

Support Equipment 0.0431

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0355

Aircraft Engines 0.0318

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0318

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0318

Ground Vehicles 0.0318

Other Commodity 0.0318

Software 0.0318

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 3 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 127: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Andrews AFB

Aircraft 0.0557

Aircraft Components 0.0494

Aircraft Engines 0.0494

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0494

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0494

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0494

Ground Vehicles 0.0494

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0494

Other Commodity 0.0494

Software 0.0494

Support Equipment 0.0494

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 4 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 128: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Arnold AFS

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.2574

Other Commodity 0.1986

Support Equipment 0.1228

Aircraft 0.0350

Aircraft Components 0.0350

Aircraft Engines 0.0350

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0350

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0350

Ground Vehicles 0.0350

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0350

Software 0.0350

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 5 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 129: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Barksdale AFB

Aircraft 0.2300

Aircraft Components 0.2212

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2107

Ground Vehicles 0.1887

Aircraft Engines 0.1812

Support Equipment 0.1100

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0697

Software 0.0697

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0695

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0561

Other Commodity 0.0545

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 6 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 130: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Beale AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2381

Aircraft 0.1902

Aircraft Engines 0.1834

Software 0.1825

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1773

Ground Vehicles 0.1725

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1117

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0426

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0426

Other Commodity 0.0426

Support Equipment 0.0426

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 7 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 131: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 8 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 132: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Cannon AFB

Aircraft Engines 0.1815

Software 0.1783

Aircraft Components 0.1774

Ground Vehicles 0.1761

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1755

Aircraft 0.1731

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0834

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0353

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0353

Other Commodity 0.0353

Support Equipment 0.0353

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 9 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 133: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Carswell ARS, NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 10 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 134: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: CG_MAGTF_TRNGCOM

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2714

Ground Vehicles 0.2204

Other Commodity 0.2176

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0970

Support Equipment 0.0896

Aircraft 0.0642

Aircraft Components 0.0642

Aircraft Engines 0.0642

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0642

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0642

Software 0.0642

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 11 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 135: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: CG_MCB_HAWAII

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2497

Aircraft Components 0.2344

Aircraft Engines 0.2258

Support Equipment 0.0745

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0621

Aircraft 0.0570

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0570

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0570

Ground Vehicles 0.0570

Other Commodity 0.0570

Software 0.0570

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 12 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 136: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: CHARLES E KELLY SPT FAC

Ground Vehicles 0.1776

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1699

Other Commodity 0.1495

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0268

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0226

Support Equipment 0.0192

Aircraft 0.0092

Aircraft Components 0.0092

Aircraft Engines 0.0092

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0092

Software 0.0092

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 13 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 137: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Cheyenne Mountain AFS

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1610

Software 0.1590

Aircraft 0.1585

Aircraft Components 0.0197

Aircraft Engines 0.0197

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0197

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0197

Ground Vehicles 0.0197

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0197

Other Commodity 0.0197

Support Equipment 0.0197

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 14 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 138: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Columbus AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.4044

Aircraft Components 0.2610

Aircraft 0.2547

Aircraft Engines 0.2522

Support Equipment 0.0760

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0677

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0576

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0576

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0576

Other Commodity 0.0576

Software 0.0576

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 15 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 139: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMAEWWINGLANT_NORFOLK_VA

Aircraft Components 0.4512

Aircraft Engines 0.3462

Aircraft 0.3235

Support Equipment 0.0926

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0697

Other Commodity 0.0579

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0541

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0541

Ground Vehicles 0.0541

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0541

Software 0.0541

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 16 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 140: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMAEWWINGPAC_POINT_MUGU_CA

Aircraft Engines 0.3396

Aircraft Components 0.3345

Support Equipment 0.1691

Aircraft 0.1058

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1047

Other Commodity 0.0730

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0116

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0116

Ground Vehicles 0.0116

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0116

Software 0.0116

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 17 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 141: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMFITWINGLANT_OCEANA_VA

Aircraft Components 0.4676

Aircraft Engines 0.4129

Other Commodity 0.1598

Aircraft 0.1567

Support Equipment 0.1337

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0725

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0146

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0146

Ground Vehicles 0.0146

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0146

Software 0.0146

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 18 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 142: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMHELTACWINGLANT_NORFOLK_VA

Aircraft Components 0.3123

Aircraft Engines 0.2822

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1651

Support Equipment 0.1524

Other Commodity 0.0673

Aircraft 0.0606

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0543

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0543

Ground Vehicles 0.0543

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0543

Software 0.0543

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 19 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 143: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMHSLWINGLANT_MAYPORT_FL

Aircraft Engines 0.3298

Aircraft Components 0.3166

Aircraft 0.1420

Support Equipment 0.0762

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0576

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0091

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0091

Ground Vehicles 0.0091

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0091

Other Commodity 0.0091

Software 0.0091

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 20 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 144: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMNAVAIRWARCENACDIV_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD

Aircraft Components 0.2972

Aircraft Engines 0.2764

Aircraft 0.2327

Other Commodity 0.1742

Support Equipment 0.1706

Software 0.0727

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0541

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0522

Ground Vehicles 0.0520

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0497

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0497

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 21 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 145: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMNAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV_CHINA_LAKE_CA

Aircraft Components 0.2684

Aircraft 0.2163

Support Equipment 0.0839

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0790

Other Commodity 0.0715

Aircraft Engines 0.0451

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0451

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0451

Ground Vehicles 0.0451

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0451

Software 0.0451

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 22 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 146: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMNAVSPECWARGRU_THREE

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 23 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 147: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMPATRECONWING_FIVE_BRUNSWICK_ME

Aircraft Components 0.2869

Aircraft Engines 0.2594

Support Equipment 0.0730

Other Commodity 0.0607

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0587

Aircraft 0.0544

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0544

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0544

Ground Vehicles 0.0544

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0544

Software 0.0544

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 24 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 148: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMSEACONWINGLANT_JACKSONVILLE_FL

Aircraft Components 0.4520

Aircraft Engines 0.3819

Support Equipment 0.2122

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1491

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1196

Other Commodity 0.0627

Aircraft 0.0543

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0543

Ground Vehicles 0.0543

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0543

Software 0.0543

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 25 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 149: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMSEACONWINGPAC_SAN_DIEGO_CA

Aircraft Engines 0.4644

Aircraft Components 0.3997

Other Commodity 0.2958

Support Equipment 0.1736

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1353

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1332

Aircraft 0.0596

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0596

Ground Vehicles 0.0596

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0596

Software 0.0596

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 26 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 150: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: COMSTRKFIGHTWINGPAC_LEMOORE_CA

Aircraft Engines 0.2472

Aircraft Components 0.2391

Aircraft 0.1889

Other Commodity 0.1332

Support Equipment 0.0515

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0356

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0109

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0109

Ground Vehicles 0.0109

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0109

Software 0.0109

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 27 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 151: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: CORPUS CHRISTI ARMY DEPOT

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 28 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 152: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Dannelly Field AGS

Ground Vehicles 0.0509

Support Equipment 0.0486

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0486

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0358

Software 0.0337

Aircraft Engines 0.0337

Aircraft Components 0.0333

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0333

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0333

Other Commodity 0.0233

Aircraft 0.0184

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 29 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 153: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Davis-Monthan AFB

Aircraft 0.2394

Aircraft Engines 0.2264

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2206

Aircraft Components 0.2003

Other Commodity 0.1714

Ground Vehicles 0.1673

Software 0.1600

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1204

Support Equipment 0.0888

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0802

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0324

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 30 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 154: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Dobbins ARB

Aircraft Engines 0.2265

Aircraft Components 0.2218

Aircraft 0.1767

Ground Vehicles 0.1653

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1585

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0599

Support Equipment 0.0397

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 31 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 155: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Dover AFB

Aircraft 0.0141

Aircraft Components 0.0141

Aircraft Engines 0.0141

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0141

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0141

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0141

Ground Vehicles 0.0141

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0141

Other Commodity 0.0141

Software 0.0141

Support Equipment 0.0141

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 32 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 156: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: DUGWAY PROVING GROUND

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 33 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 157: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Dyess AFB

Aircraft 0.2864

Aircraft Components 0.2622

Aircraft Engines 0.2290

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2176

Ground Vehicles 0.1991

Software 0.1778

Support Equipment 0.0985

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0797

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0776

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0367

Other Commodity 0.0367

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 34 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 158: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Edwards AFB

Aircraft 0.3473

Aircraft Engines 0.2581

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2238

Aircraft Components 0.2202

Support Equipment 0.0999

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0868

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0701

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0237

Ground Vehicles 0.0237

Other Commodity 0.0237

Software 0.0237

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 35 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 159: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Eglin AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.2656

Aircraft Components 0.2635

Aircraft 0.2397

Aircraft Engines 0.2230

Ground Vehicle Components 0.1153

Support Equipment 0.0903

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0896

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0782

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0687

Other Commodity 0.0687

Software 0.0687

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 36 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 160: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Eielson AFB

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2160

Aircraft Engines 0.1928

Aircraft 0.1925

Aircraft Components 0.1708

Other Commodity 0.1524

Ground Vehicles 0.1511

Support Equipment 0.0564

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0450

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0290

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0141

Software 0.0141

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 37 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 161: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Ellington Field AGS

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 38 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 162: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Ellsworth AFB

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.3197

Ground Vehicles 0.2019

Aircraft 0.1969

Aircraft Components 0.1931

Aircraft Engines 0.1700

Software 0.1674

Other Commodity 0.1642

Support Equipment 0.0806

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0656

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0269

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0256

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 39 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 163: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Elmendorf AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2134

Aircraft Engines 0.2101

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0821

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0821

Ground Vehicles 0.0821

Software 0.0821

Aircraft 0.0814

Support Equipment 0.0814

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0811

Other Commodity 0.0810

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0672

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 40 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 164: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Fairchild AFB

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 41 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 165: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT A P HILL

Ground Vehicles 0.2124

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0366

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0333

Aircraft 0.0226

Aircraft Components 0.0226

Aircraft Engines 0.0226

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0226

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0226

Other Commodity 0.0226

Software 0.0226

Support Equipment 0.0226

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 42 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 166: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT BELVOIR

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1461

Aircraft 0.1398

Ground Vehicles 0.1395

Aircraft Components 0.1245

Aircraft Engines 0.0975

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0235

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0228

Other Commodity 0.0228

Software 0.0228

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0003

Support Equipment 0.0003

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 43 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 167: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT BENNING

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2365

Aircraft 0.2227

Aircraft Components 0.2207

Aircraft Engines 0.1956

Ground Vehicles 0.1909

Other Commodity 0.1190

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0882

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0805

Support Equipment 0.0707

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0707

Software 0.0542

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 44 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 168: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT BLISS

Aircraft Components 0.2531

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2432

Aircraft 0.2289

Ground Vehicles 0.2185

Other Commodity 0.2169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.1225

Support Equipment 0.0892

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0794

Aircraft Engines 0.0651

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0575

Software 0.0543

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 45 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 169: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT BRAGG

Ground Vehicles 0.2033

Aircraft 0.1989

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1915

Aircraft Engines 0.1896

Aircraft Components 0.1700

Support Equipment 0.0288

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0265

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0225

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0191

Other Commodity 0.0190

Software 0.0091

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 46 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 170: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT CAMPBELL

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.3621

Other Commodity 0.2951

Ground Vehicles 0.2547

Aircraft 0.2059

Aircraft Components 0.1482

Aircraft Engines 0.1105

Support Equipment 0.0736

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0729

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0497

Software 0.0497

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0361

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 47 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 171: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT CARSON

Software 0.4997

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2295

Aircraft Components 0.2045

Aircraft 0.1874

Aircraft Engines 0.1859

Other Commodity 0.1784

Ground Vehicles 0.1772

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0843

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0769

Support Equipment 0.0716

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0688

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 48 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 172: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT DIX

Software 0.0356

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0307

Ground Vehicles 0.0188

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0135

Support Equipment 0.0082

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0074

Other Commodity 0.0006

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 49 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 173: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT DRUM

Aircraft Components 0.2649

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2628

Aircraft 0.2555

Ground Vehicles 0.2310

Aircraft Engines 0.2301

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1090

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0943

Support Equipment 0.0850

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0639

Other Commodity 0.0497

Software 0.0497

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 50 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 174: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT EUSTIS

Aircraft Engines 0.1923

Aircraft Components 0.1855

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1846

Aircraft 0.1535

Ground Vehicles 0.1448

Other Commodity 0.1397

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0753

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0667

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0655

Support Equipment 0.0595

Software 0.0546

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 51 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 175: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT HAMILTON

Ground Vehicles 0.1465

Aircraft 0.0495

Aircraft Components 0.0495

Aircraft Engines 0.0495

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0495

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0495

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0495

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0495

Other Commodity 0.0495

Software 0.0495

Support Equipment 0.0495

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 52 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 176: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT HOOD

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2766

Ground Vehicles 0.2298

Aircraft 0.2289

Aircraft Engines 0.1941

Aircraft Components 0.1791

Ground Vehicle Components 0.1267

Support Equipment 0.0766

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0723

Other Commodity 0.0699

Software 0.0681

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0611

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 53 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 177: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT HUACHUCA

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1628

Ground Vehicles 0.1380

Support Equipment 0.0214

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0043

Aircraft 0.0023

Aircraft Components 0.0023

Aircraft Engines 0.0023

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0023

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0023

Software 0.0023

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 54 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 178: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT JACKSON

Ground Vehicles 0.1770

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1592

Software 0.0694

Other Commodity 0.0580

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0567

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0567

Support Equipment 0.0565

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0563

Aircraft 0.0464

Aircraft Components 0.0464

Aircraft Engines 0.0464

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 55 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 179: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT KNOX

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.3221

Ground Vehicles 0.2389

Aircraft Components 0.1873

Ground Vehicle Components 0.1538

Aircraft Engines 0.1530

Aircraft 0.1482

Other Commodity 0.1218

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0469

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0408

Support Equipment 0.0231

Software 0.0230

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 56 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 180: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT LEAVENWORTH

Aircraft 0.0007

Aircraft Components 0.0007

Aircraft Engines 0.0007

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0007

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0007

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0007

Ground Vehicles 0.0007

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0007

Other Commodity 0.0007

Software 0.0007

Support Equipment 0.0007

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 57 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 181: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT LEE

Support Equipment 0.0422

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0290

Software 0.0278

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0202

Other Commodity 0.0178

Ground Vehicles 0.0089

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0051

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0004

Aircraft 0.0004

Aircraft Components 0.0004

Aircraft Engines 0.0004

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 58 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 182: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT LEONARD WOOD

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2322

Other Commodity 0.2077

Ground Vehicles 0.1919

Ground Vehicle Components 0.1040

Support Equipment 0.0934

Software 0.0705

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0679

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0632

Aircraft 0.0537

Aircraft Components 0.0474

Aircraft Engines 0.0474

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 59 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 183: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT LEWIS

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2928

Ground Vehicles 0.2820

Aircraft 0.1834

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0966

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0787

Support Equipment 0.0776

Aircraft Components 0.0729

Aircraft Engines 0.0694

Other Commodity 0.0542

Software 0.0542

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0413

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 60 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 184: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT MCCOY

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.3980

Other Commodity 0.3513

Ground Vehicles 0.2936

Ground Vehicle Components 0.2723

Support Equipment 0.2561

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1725

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0852

Aircraft 0.0541

Aircraft Components 0.0541

Aircraft Engines 0.0541

Software 0.0541

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 61 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 185: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT MCPHERSON

Other Commodity 0.1801

Ground Vehicles 0.1479

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 62 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 186: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT MEADE

Ground Vehicles 0.1581

Support Equipment 0.0300

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0048

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0007

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 63 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 187: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT MONMOUTH

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 64 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 188: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT POLK

Ground Vehicles 0.3888

Aircraft 0.2624

Aircraft Components 0.2160

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.2043

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1346

Aircraft Engines 0.1268

Other Commodity 0.1011

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0540

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0496

Software 0.0496

Support Equipment 0.0496

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 65 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 189: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT RICHARDSON

Aircraft Engines 0.1907

Aircraft 0.1840

Aircraft Components 0.1837

Other Commodity 0.1834

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1806

Ground Vehicles 0.1702

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0746

Software 0.0715

Support Equipment 0.0659

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0591

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0560

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 66 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 190: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT RILEY

Other Commodity 0.2846

Ground Vehicles 0.2210

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2115

Aircraft Components 0.1548

Aircraft Engines 0.1538

Aircraft 0.1226

Support Equipment 0.0373

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0304

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0284

Software 0.0272

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0057

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 67 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 191: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT RUCKER

Aircraft Engines 0.2965

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2204

Aircraft Components 0.2141

Aircraft 0.1919

Ground Vehicles 0.1752

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0344

Other Commodity 0.0274

Support Equipment 0.0257

Software 0.0237

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0226

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0226

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 68 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 192: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT SAM HOUSTON

Other Commodity 0.2276

Ground Vehicles 0.2155

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2051

Support Equipment 0.0986

Software 0.0771

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0710

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0668

Aircraft 0.0604

Aircraft Engines 0.0592

Aircraft Components 0.0569

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0489

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 69 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 193: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT SHAFTER

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 70 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 194: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT SILL

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2304

Other Commodity 0.1495

Ground Vehicles 0.1269

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0903

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0711

Support Equipment 0.0599

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0569

Aircraft 0.0541

Aircraft Components 0.0541

Aircraft Engines 0.0541

Software 0.0541

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 71 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 195: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT STEWART

Aircraft Components 0.1156

Aircraft Engines 0.1126

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1018

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0883

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0699

Ground Vehicles 0.0648

Aircraft 0.0631

Other Commodity 0.0602

Software 0.0542

Support Equipment 0.0492

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0417

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 72 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 196: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: FORT WAINWRIGHT

Ground Vehicles 0.1857

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1511

Aircraft Components 0.0846

Aircraft Engines 0.0688

Aircraft 0.0538

Software 0.0451

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0360

Support Equipment 0.0328

Other Commodity 0.0303

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0285

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0204

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 73 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 197: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Francis E. Warren AFB

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 74 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 198: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Gen Mitchell IAP ARS

Ground Vehicles 0.0164

Aircraft 0.0141

Aircraft Components 0.0141

Aircraft Engines 0.0141

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0141

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0141

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0141

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0141

Other Commodity 0.0141

Software 0.0141

Support Equipment 0.0141

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 75 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 199: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Goodfellow AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.2174

Aircraft 0.0259

Aircraft Components 0.0259

Aircraft Engines 0.0259

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0259

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0259

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0259

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0259

Other Commodity 0.0259

Software 0.0259

Support Equipment 0.0259

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 76 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 200: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Hickam AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2447

Ground Vehicles 0.2200

Software 0.2182

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2035

Aircraft Engines 0.2017

Aircraft 0.1911

Other Commodity 0.1855

Support Equipment 0.1236

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0951

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0837

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0837

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 77 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 201: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Hill AFB

Support Equipment 0.2037

Aircraft Components 0.0814

Aircraft Engines 0.0692

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0486

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0387

Aircraft 0.0312

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0277

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0277

Ground Vehicles 0.0277

Other Commodity 0.0277

Software 0.0277

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 78 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 202: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Holloman AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.2209

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2186

Aircraft 0.2090

Aircraft Components 0.2047

Aircraft Engines 0.1804

Software 0.1394

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0949

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0930

Support Equipment 0.0874

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0676

Other Commodity 0.0676

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 79 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 203: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Keesler AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2652

Aircraft 0.2425

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2393

Aircraft Engines 0.2327

Ground Vehicles 0.2273

Other Commodity 0.2164

Support Equipment 0.0955

Software 0.0952

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0867

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0821

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0722

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 80 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 204: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Kirtland AFB

Aircraft Engines 0.2558

Aircraft 0.1547

Aircraft Components 0.0260

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0260

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0260

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0260

Ground Vehicles 0.0260

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0260

Other Commodity 0.0260

Software 0.0260

Support Equipment 0.0260

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 81 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 205: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Klamath Falls IAP AGS

Software 0.2880

Aircraft Engines 0.2249

Aircraft Components 0.2181

Aircraft 0.2137

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2068

Ground Vehicles 0.1914

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0728

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0689

Support Equipment 0.0667

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0647

Other Commodity 0.0647

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 82 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 206: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Langley AFB

Aircraft 0.2020

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1959

Aircraft Engines 0.1952

Aircraft Components 0.1916

Software 0.1915

Ground Vehicles 0.1884

Support Equipment 0.0908

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0498

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0498

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0498

Other Commodity 0.0201

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 83 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 207: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: LANTORDCOM_YORKTOWN_VA

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2564

Other Commodity 0.2170

Support Equipment 0.1219

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0935

Aircraft 0.0542

Aircraft Components 0.0542

Aircraft Engines 0.0542

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0542

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0542

Ground Vehicles 0.0542

Software 0.0542

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 84 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 208: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Laughlin AFB

Aircraft 0.2899

Aircraft Engines 0.2846

Aircraft Components 0.2416

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2205

Ground Vehicles 0.2127

Support Equipment 0.0778

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0172

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0172

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0172

Other Commodity 0.0172

Software 0.0172

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 85 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 209: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1106

Aircraft 0.0457

Aircraft Components 0.0457

Aircraft Engines 0.0457

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0457

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0457

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0457

Ground Vehicles 0.0457

Other Commodity 0.0457

Software 0.0457

Support Equipment 0.0457

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 86 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 210: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: LIMA ARMY TANK PLT

Aircraft 0.0452

Aircraft Components 0.0452

Aircraft Engines 0.0452

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0452

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0452

Ground Vehicles 0.0452

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0452

Other Commodity 0.0452

Software 0.0452

Support Equipment 0.0452

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0305

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 87 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 211: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Little Rock AFB

Aircraft 0.2558

Ground Vehicles 0.2387

Aircraft Components 0.2225

Other Commodity 0.2096

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2065

Aircraft Engines 0.2043

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1132

Support Equipment 0.0870

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0709

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0709

Software 0.0709

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 88 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 212: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Luke AFB

Aircraft 0.2848

Aircraft Engines 0.2609

Ground Vehicles 0.2033

Aircraft Components 0.1929

Support Equipment 0.0742

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0658

Other Commodity 0.0657

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0605

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0523

Software 0.0360

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0207

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 89 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 213: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: MacDill AFB

Aircraft 0.0226

Aircraft Components 0.0226

Aircraft Engines 0.0226

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0226

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0226

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0226

Ground Vehicles 0.0226

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0226

Other Commodity 0.0226

Software 0.0226

Support Equipment 0.0226

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 90 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 214: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Malmstrom AFB

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1979

Other Commodity 0.1936

Ground Vehicles 0.1922

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0574

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0574

Support Equipment 0.0574

Aircraft 0.0421

Aircraft Components 0.0124

Aircraft Engines 0.0124

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0124

Software 0.0124

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 91 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 215: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: March ARB

Aircraft 0.0197

Aircraft Components 0.0197

Aircraft Engines 0.0197

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0197

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0197

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0197

Ground Vehicles 0.0197

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0197

Other Commodity 0.0197

Software 0.0197

Support Equipment 0.0197

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 92 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 216: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Maxwell AFB

Other Commodity 0.1911

Ground Vehicles 0.1876

Support Equipment 0.0506

Aircraft 0.0384

Aircraft Components 0.0384

Aircraft Engines 0.0384

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0384

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0384

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0384

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0384

Software 0.0384

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 93 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 217: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: MCALESTER AAP

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0554

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 94 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 218: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: MCAS_BEAUFORT_SC

Aircraft Components 0.2768

Aircraft Engines 0.2508

Aircraft 0.2503

Support Equipment 0.1712

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0731

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0731

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0731

Ground Vehicles 0.0731

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0731

Other Commodity 0.0731

Software 0.0731

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 95 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 219: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: MCAS_YUMA_AZ

Software 0.4765

Aircraft Components 0.2763

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2544

Aircraft Engines 0.2475

Support Equipment 0.0935

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0763

Aircraft 0.0600

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0600

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0600

Ground Vehicles 0.0600

Other Commodity 0.0600

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 96 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 220: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: McConnell AFB

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 97 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 221: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: McGuire AFB

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 98 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 222: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Memphis IAP AGS

Aircraft Components 0.2334

Aircraft 0.2266

Aircraft Engines 0.2212

Other Commodity 0.2087

Software 0.0911

Support Equipment 0.0780

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0773

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0681

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0681

Ground Vehicles 0.0681

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0681

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 99 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 223: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Minot AFB

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2387

Ground Vehicles 0.2224

Aircraft 0.1870

Aircraft Components 0.1788

Aircraft Engines 0.1774

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1013

Support Equipment 0.0854

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0200

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0200

Other Commodity 0.0200

Software 0.0200

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 100 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 224: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Moody AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2236

Aircraft 0.1795

Support Equipment 0.0626

Aircraft Engines 0.0023

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0023

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0023

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0023

Ground Vehicles 0.0023

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0023

Other Commodity 0.0023

Software 0.0023

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 101 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 225: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAF_WASHINGTON

Aircraft Components 0.1886

Other Commodity 0.1706

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0869

Support Equipment 0.0710

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0551

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0551

Aircraft 0.0254

Aircraft Engines 0.0254

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0254

Ground Vehicles 0.0254

Software 0.0254

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 102 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 226: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_ATLANTA_GA

Aircraft Components 0.1201

Other Commodity 0.0885

Support Equipment 0.0875

Aircraft Engines 0.0857

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0811

Aircraft 0.0265

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0265

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0265

Ground Vehicles 0.0265

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0265

Software 0.0265

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 103 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 227: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_CORPUS_CHRISTI_TX

Support Equipment 0.1177

Other Commodity 0.0891

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0758

Aircraft Components 0.0656

Aircraft 0.0366

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0094

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 104 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 228: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_FALLON_NV

Aircraft Engines 0.2620

Aircraft Components 0.2618

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1996

Support Equipment 0.1068

Software 0.0953

Aircraft 0.0786

Ground Vehicles 0.0746

Other Commodity 0.0740

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0723

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0723

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0723

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 105 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 229: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_KEY_WEST_FL

Aircraft Components 0.2681

Support Equipment 0.1256

Aircraft Engines 0.1136

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0958

Aircraft 0.0927

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0676

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0676

Ground Vehicles 0.0676

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0676

Other Commodity 0.0676

Software 0.0676

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 106 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 230: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_KINGSVILLE_TX

Aircraft Engines 0.1804

Aircraft 0.1774

Aircraft Components 0.1473

Software 0.0782

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0779

Ground Vehicles 0.0779

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0779

Support Equipment 0.0778

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0778

Other Commodity 0.0777

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0777

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 107 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 231: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_LEMOORE_CA

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1646

Support Equipment 0.1245

Aircraft 0.0979

Aircraft Components 0.0979

Aircraft Engines 0.0979

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0979

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0979

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0979

Ground Vehicles 0.0979

Other Commodity 0.0979

Software 0.0979

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 108 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 232: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 109 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 233: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_PENSACOLA_FL

Aircraft Components 0.2863

Aircraft Engines 0.2166

Support Equipment 0.1072

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0772

Aircraft 0.0729

Ground Vehicles 0.0384

Other Commodity 0.0328

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0231

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0231

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0231

Software 0.0231

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 110 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 234: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_WHIDBEY_ISLAND_WA

Aircraft Engines 0.4600

Aircraft Components 0.3344

Support Equipment 0.1021

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0765

Other Commodity 0.0576

Aircraft 0.0484

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0484

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0484

Ground Vehicles 0.0484

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0484

Software 0.0484

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 111 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 235: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAS_WHITING_FIELD_MILTON_FL

Aircraft Components 0.2457

Aircraft Engines 0.2185

Aircraft 0.2005

Support Equipment 0.0824

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0544

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0544

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0544

Ground Vehicles 0.0544

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0544

Other Commodity 0.0544

Software 0.0544

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 112 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 236: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVAIRENGSTA_LAKEHURST_NJ

Support Equipment 0.1508

Aircraft 0.0980

Aircraft Components 0.0980

Aircraft Engines 0.0980

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0980

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0980

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0980

Ground Vehicles 0.0980

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0980

Other Commodity 0.0980

Software 0.0980

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 113 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 237: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVAIRES_FORT_WORTH_TX

Aircraft Engines 0.2026

Aircraft Components 0.1964

Aircraft 0.1673

Other Commodity 0.1600

Support Equipment 0.0791

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0625

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0603

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0102

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0102

Ground Vehicles 0.0102

Software 0.0102

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 114 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 238: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVAIRES_NEW_ORLEANS_LA

Aircraft Engines 0.2726

Aircraft Components 0.2566

Other Commodity 0.1928

Support Equipment 0.0883

Software 0.0771

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0718

Aircraft 0.0604

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0566

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0541

Ground Vehicles 0.0541

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0541

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 115 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 239: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVAIRES_WILLOW_GROVE_PA

Aircraft Components 0.2721

Aircraft Engines 0.2221

Support Equipment 0.1548

Software 0.0794

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0673

Other Commodity 0.0638

Aircraft 0.0626

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0588

Ground Vehicles 0.0586

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0563

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0563

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 116 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 240: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVAIRWPNSTA_CHINA_LAKE_CA

Aircraft 0.0592

Aircraft Components 0.0592

Aircraft Engines 0.0592

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0592

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0592

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0592

Ground Vehicles 0.0592

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0592

Other Commodity 0.0592

Software 0.0592

Support Equipment 0.0592

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 117 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 241: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVMAG_INDIAN_ISLAND

Other Commodity 0.1831

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1427

Aircraft 0.0739

Aircraft Components 0.0739

Aircraft Engines 0.0739

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0739

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0739

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0739

Ground Vehicles 0.0739

Software 0.0739

Support Equipment 0.0739

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 118 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 242: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVNUPWRTRAU_BALLSTON_SPA_NY

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 119 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 243: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVNUPWRTRAU_CHARLESTON_SC

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0325

Support Equipment 0.0325

Aircraft 0.0226

Aircraft Components 0.0226

Aircraft Engines 0.0226

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0226

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0226

Ground Vehicles 0.0226

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0226

Other Commodity 0.0226

Software 0.0226

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 120 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 244: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVSUBSUPPFAC_NEW_LONDON_CT

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 121 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 245: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1706

Support Equipment 0.1668

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0245

Aircraft 0.0096

Aircraft Components 0.0096

Aircraft Engines 0.0096

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0096

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0096

Ground Vehicles 0.0096

Other Commodity 0.0096

Software 0.0096

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 122 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 246: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.3286

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.2346

Aircraft 0.0358

Aircraft Components 0.0358

Aircraft Engines 0.0358

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0358

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0358

Ground Vehicles 0.0358

Other Commodity 0.0358

Software 0.0358

Support Equipment 0.0358

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 123 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 247: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVWPNSTA_SEAL_BEACH_CA

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1210

Aircraft 0.0301

Aircraft Components 0.0301

Aircraft Engines 0.0301

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0301

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0301

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0301

Ground Vehicles 0.0301

Other Commodity 0.0301

Software 0.0301

Support Equipment 0.0301

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 124 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 248: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVWPNSTA_SEAL_BEACH_CA_DET_FALLBROOK

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0918

Aircraft 0.0249

Aircraft Components 0.0249

Aircraft Engines 0.0249

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0249

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0249

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0249

Ground Vehicles 0.0249

Other Commodity 0.0249

Software 0.0249

Support Equipment 0.0249

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 125 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 249: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NAVWPNSTA_SEAL_BEACH_CA_DET_SAN_DIEGO

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1079

Aircraft 0.0097

Aircraft Components 0.0097

Aircraft Engines 0.0097

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0097

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0097

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0097

Ground Vehicles 0.0097

Other Commodity 0.0097

Software 0.0097

Support Equipment 0.0097

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 126 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 250: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Nellis AFB

Aircraft 0.2007

Aircraft Engines 0.1927

Aircraft Components 0.1896

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1827

Ground Vehicles 0.1674

Software 0.0711

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0491

Support Equipment 0.0435

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0422

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0409

Other Commodity 0.0409

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 127 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 251: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Niagara Falls IAP ARS

Software 0.0400

Aircraft 0.0232

Aircraft Engines 0.0221

Aircraft Components 0.0197

Other Commodity 0.0186

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 128 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 252: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NTC AND FORT IRWIN CA

Ground Vehicles 0.1749

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1488

Other Commodity 0.1331

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0100

Support Equipment 0.0100

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0100

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 129 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 253: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: NUWC_DIV_KEYPORT_DET_WEST_LOCH_HI

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1709

Aircraft 0.0095

Aircraft Components 0.0095

Aircraft Engines 0.0095

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0095

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0095

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0095

Ground Vehicles 0.0095

Other Commodity 0.0095

Software 0.0095

Support Equipment 0.0095

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 130 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 254: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Offutt AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2376

Software 0.2246

Aircraft 0.2180

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2102

Ground Vehicles 0.2050

Aircraft Engines 0.2037

Support Equipment 0.0791

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0561

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0561

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0561

Other Commodity 0.0561

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 131 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 255: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Patrick AFB

Aircraft 0.0632

Aircraft Components 0.0632

Aircraft Engines 0.0632

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0632

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0632

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0632

Ground Vehicles 0.0632

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0632

Other Commodity 0.0632

Software 0.0632

Support Equipment 0.0632

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 132 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 256: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: PICATINNY ARSENAL

Aircraft 0.1613

Ground Vehicles 0.1388

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0573

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0562

Aircraft Components 0.0551

Aircraft Engines 0.0550

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0541

Other Commodity 0.0541

Software 0.0541

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0512

Support Equipment 0.0287

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 133 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 257: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Pope AFB

Aircraft Components 0.0466

Support Equipment 0.0466

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 134 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 258: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Randolph AFB

Aircraft 0.2788

Aircraft Components 0.2448

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2429

Aircraft Engines 0.2322

Ground Vehicles 0.2131

Support Equipment 0.0924

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0854

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0739

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0739

Other Commodity 0.0739

Software 0.0739

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 135 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 259: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: REDSTONE ARSENAL

Other Commodity 0.2265

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2224

Ground Vehicles 0.2169

Support Equipment 0.1610

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0752

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0750

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0723

Aircraft 0.0547

Aircraft Components 0.0547

Aircraft Engines 0.0547

Software 0.0547

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 136 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 260: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Robins AFB

Aircraft Components 0.3418

Software 0.2814

Aircraft 0.2169

Ground Vehicles 0.1857

Aircraft Engines 0.0594

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0594

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0594

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0594

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0594

Other Commodity 0.0594

Support Equipment 0.0594

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 137 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 261: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0123

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0123

Ground Vehicles 0.0123

Other Commodity 0.0112

Aircraft 0.0012

Aircraft Components 0.0012

Aircraft Engines 0.0012

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0012

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0012

Software 0.0012

Support Equipment 0.0012

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 138 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 262: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS

Software 0.0331

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0300

Ground Vehicles 0.0248

Other Commodity 0.0125

Support Equipment 0.0106

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0104

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0077

Aircraft 0.0063

Aircraft Engines 0.0052

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0040

Aircraft Components 0.0028

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 139 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 263: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Scott AFB

Aircraft 0.0169

Aircraft Components 0.0169

Aircraft Engines 0.0169

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0169

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ground Vehicles 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Other Commodity 0.0169

Software 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 140 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 264: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SCRANTON AAP

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 141 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 265: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Selfridge ANGB

Ground Vehicles 0.1617

Support Equipment 0.0594

Aircraft 0.0141

Aircraft Components 0.0141

Aircraft Engines 0.0141

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0141

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0141

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0141

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0141

Other Commodity 0.0141

Software 0.0141

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 142 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 266: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Seymour Johnson AFB

Aircraft 0.2732

Software 0.2177

Aircraft Components 0.2170

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2163

Aircraft Engines 0.2035

Ground Vehicles 0.1975

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0741

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0741

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0741

Other Commodity 0.0588

Support Equipment 0.0588

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 143 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 267: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Shaw AFB

Aircraft Engines 0.2314

Aircraft 0.1934

Aircraft Components 0.1900

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1881

Software 0.1866

Ground Vehicles 0.1795

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0455

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0455

Support Equipment 0.0451

Other Commodity 0.0449

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0448

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 144 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 268: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Sheppard AFB

Other Commodity 0.2631

Aircraft 0.2587

Aircraft Components 0.2565

Aircraft Engines 0.2504

Ground Vehicles 0.2245

Support Equipment 0.1472

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.1021

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0867

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0540

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0540

Software 0.0540

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 145 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 269: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SIERRA ARMY DEPOT

Other Commodity 0.3454

Aircraft Components 0.1831

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0526

Aircraft 0.0496

Aircraft Engines 0.0496

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0496

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0496

Ground Vehicles 0.0496

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0496

Software 0.0496

Support Equipment 0.0496

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 146 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 270: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SIMA_NORFOLK_VA

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 147 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 271: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Springfield-Beckley MPT AGS

Aircraft Engines 0.1686

Aircraft 0.1423

Ground Vehicles 0.1402

Aircraft Components 0.1314

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0254

Support Equipment 0.0240

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0210

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0141

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0141

Other Commodity 0.0141

Software 0.0141

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 148 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 272: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Stewart IAP AGS

Aircraft Components 0.2367

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2333

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0672

Aircraft 0.0322

Aircraft Engines 0.0322

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0322

Ground Vehicles 0.0322

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0322

Other Commodity 0.0322

Software 0.0322

Support Equipment 0.0322

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 149 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 273: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SUBTORPFAC_YORKTOWN_VA

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1728

Aircraft 0.0542

Aircraft Components 0.0542

Aircraft Engines 0.0542

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0542

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0542

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0542

Ground Vehicles 0.0542

Other Commodity 0.0542

Software 0.0542

Support Equipment 0.0542

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 150 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 274: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SWFLANT_KINGS_BAY_GA

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0575

Aircraft 0.0451

Aircraft Components 0.0451

Aircraft Engines 0.0451

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0451

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0451

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0451

Ground Vehicles 0.0451

Software 0.0451

Support Equipment 0.0451

Other Commodity 0.0302

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 151 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 275: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: SWFPAC_BANGOR_WA

Support Equipment 0.1309

Software 0.0681

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0551

Aircraft 0.0513

Aircraft Engines 0.0502

Aircraft Components 0.0478

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0476

Ground Vehicles 0.0474

Other Commodity 0.0467

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0451

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0451

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 152 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 276: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Tinker AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.3641

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0807

Other Commodity 0.0804

Software 0.0633

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0551

Aircraft 0.0465

Aircraft Engines 0.0453

Aircraft Components 0.0430

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0402

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0402

Support Equipment 0.0402

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 153 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 277: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: TOOELE ARMY DEPOT

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0887

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0755

Aircraft 0.0546

Aircraft Components 0.0546

Aircraft Engines 0.0546

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0546

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0546

Ground Vehicles 0.0546

Other Commodity 0.0546

Software 0.0546

Support Equipment 0.0546

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 154 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 278: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Travis AFB

Software 0.0697

Aircraft 0.0529

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0491

Ground Vehicles 0.0489

Other Commodity 0.0483

Aircraft Components 0.0466

Aircraft Engines 0.0466

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0466

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0466

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0466

Support Equipment 0.0466

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 155 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 279: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Tucson IAP AGS

Aircraft 0.2233

Aircraft Components 0.2146

Aircraft Engines 0.2060

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1700

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0659

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0609

Support Equipment 0.0588

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0440

Ground Vehicles 0.0440

Other Commodity 0.0440

Software 0.0440

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 156 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 280: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Tyndall AFB

Aircraft 0.2660

Aircraft Engines 0.2491

Aircraft Components 0.2036

Ground Vehicles 0.1804

Other Commodity 0.1706

Support Equipment 0.0830

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0499

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0412

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0412

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0412

Software 0.0412

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 157 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 281: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Vance AFB

Aircraft Engines 0.3055

Aircraft Components 0.2667

Aircraft 0.2648

Ground Vehicles 0.1864

Support Equipment 0.1569

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0745

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0510

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0448

Software 0.0448

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0448

Other Commodity 0.0448

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 158 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 282: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Vandenberg AFB

Ground Vehicles 0.0473

Aircraft 0.0172

Aircraft Components 0.0172

Aircraft Engines 0.0172

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0172

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0172

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0172

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0172

Other Commodity 0.0172

Software 0.0172

Support Equipment 0.0172

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 159 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 283: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER

Aircraft 0.0001

Aircraft Components 0.0001

Aircraft Engines 0.0001

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0001

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0001

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0001

Ground Vehicles 0.0001

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0001

Other Commodity 0.0001

Software 0.0001

Support Equipment 0.0001

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 160 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 284: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Westover ARB

Aircraft 0.0322

Aircraft Components 0.0322

Aircraft Engines 0.0322

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0322

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0322

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0322

Ground Vehicles 0.0322

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0322

Other Commodity 0.0322

Software 0.0322

Support Equipment 0.0322

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 161 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 285: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE

Aircraft 0.0395

Aircraft Components 0.0395

Aircraft Engines 0.0395

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0395

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0395

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0395

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0395

Other Commodity 0.0395

Software 0.0395

Ground Vehicles 0.0170

Support Equipment 0.0170

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 162 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 286: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Whiteman AFB

Aircraft Components 0.2408

Aircraft 0.2344

Aircraft Engines 0.1989

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.1988

Other Commodity 0.1981

Ground Vehicles 0.1861

Support Equipment 0.0910

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0610

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0610

Software 0.0610

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0595

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 163 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 287: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Willow Grove ARS, NAS Willow Grove Joint Reserve

Software 0.0400

Aircraft 0.0232

Aircraft Engines 0.0221

Aircraft Components 0.0197

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0194

Ground Vehicles 0.0192

Other Commodity 0.0186

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0169

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0169

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0169

Support Equipment 0.0169

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 164 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 288: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: WPNSTA_CHARLESTON_SC

Other Commodity 0.2494

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.1284

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0885

Aircraft 0.0709

Aircraft Components 0.0709

Aircraft Engines 0.0709

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0709

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0709

Ground Vehicles 0.0709

Software 0.0709

Support Equipment 0.0709

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 165 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 289: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Wright-Patterson AFB

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.2355

Aircraft 0.2299

Aircraft Engines 0.2271

Aircraft Components 0.2264

Other Commodity 0.1924

Ground Vehicles 0.1811

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0666

Support Equipment 0.0550

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0470

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0470

Software 0.0470

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 166 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 290: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: Youngstown-Warren Regional APT ARS

Aircraft 0.0197

Aircraft Components 0.0197

Aircraft Engines 0.0197

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0197

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0197

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0197

Ground Vehicles 0.0197

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0197

Other Commodity 0.0197

Software 0.0197

Support Equipment 0.0197

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 167 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 291: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Maintenance IMA Activity: YUMA PROVING GROUND

Aircraft 0.2385

Aircraft Engines 0.2290

Support Equipment 0.0935

Fabrication & Manufacturing 0.0843

Ground Vehicles 0.0767

Communication/Electronic Equipment 0.0719

Aircraft Components 0.0576

Other Commodity 0.0567

Software 0.0542

Ordnance, Weapons, & Missiles 0.0529

Ground Vehicle Components 0.0499

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 168 of 168 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 292: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Munitions Activity: Score:

Armaments Production ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.9520

WATERVLIET ARSENAL 0.8687

LIMA ARMY TANK PLT 0.5844

Demilitarization HAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOT 0.8181

TOOELE ARMY DEPOT 0.7257

MCALESTER AAP 0.6995

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT 0.4704

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT 0.3104

CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITY 0.2971

RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT 0.1671

IOWA AAP 0.1420

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT 0.1205

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 1 of 5 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 293: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Munitions Activity: Score: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL 0.0078

KANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 0.0074

LONE STAR AAP 0.0071

LAKE CITY AAP 0.0006

Munitions Maintenance BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT 0.6359

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT 0.3774

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT 0.3119

MCALESTER AAP 0.2589

RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT 0.2003

CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITY 0.1951

Hill AFB 0.0999

TOOELE ARMY DEPOT 0.0863

REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0765

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 2 of 5 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 294: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Munitions Activity: Score:

Munitions Production MCALESTER AAP 0.5967

MILAN AAP 0.5708

LONE STAR AAP 0.5319

CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITY 0.4836

NAVSURFWARCENDIV_INDIAN_HEAD_MD 0.4592

IOWA AAP 0.3144

LAKE CITY AAP 0.2992

KANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 0.2781

RADFORD AAP 0.2735

SCRANTON AAP 0.2450

NSWC_INDIAN_HEAD_DET_YORKTOWN 0.2042

PINE BLUFF ARSENAL 0.1911

HOLSTON AAP 0.1493

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 3 of 5 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 295: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Munitions Activity: Score:

RIVERBANK AAP 0.1075

MISSISSIPPI AAP 0.0765

LOUISIANA AAP 0.0343

Storage and Distribution MCALESTER AAP 0.6168

HAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOT 0.5789

CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITY 0.4131

RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT 0.3298

TOOELE ARMY DEPOT 0.3282

SIERRA ARMY DEPOT 0.2879

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT 0.2607

LOUISIANA AAP 0.2441

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT 0.1803

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT 0.1671

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 4 of 5 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 296: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Munitions Activity: Score:

UMATILLA CHEM DEPOT 0.1280

MILAN AAP 0.1117

IOWA AAP 0.0642

PINE BLUFF ARSENAL 0.0409

RADFORD AAP 0.0377

LAKE CITY AAP 0.0375

PUEBLO CHEM DEPOT 0.0332

DESERET CHEMICAL DEPOT 0.0268

KANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 0.0231

NEWPORT CHEM DEPOT 0.0205

LONE STAR AAP 0.0090

HOLSTON AAP 0.0024

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 5 of 5 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 297: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Shipyards Activity: Score: NAVSHIPYD_PUGET_SOUND_WA 0.7480

NAVSHIPYD_NORFOLK_VA 0.7339

NAVSHIPYD_PORTSMOUTH_NH 0.6444

NAVSHIPYD_AND_IMF_PEARL_HARBOR_HI 0.6208

NNSY_DET_NAVFOUNDRYPROPCEN_PHIL_PA 0.2220

NAVSHIPYD_PUGET_SOUND_DET_BOSTON_MA 0.0872

SUBMEPP_PORTSMOUTH_NH 0.0630

NNSY_DET_NAVPESO_ANNAPOLIS_MD 0.0555

NNSY_DET_NAVSHIPSO_PHIL_PA 0.0546

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 1 of 1 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 298: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IJCSG Summary Military Value Report for Shipyard IMA Activity: Score: SIMA_SAN_DIEGO_CA 0.5980

TRIREFFAC_KINGS_BAY_GA 0.5801

NAVIMFAC_PACNORWEST_BANGOR_WA 0.5213

SIMA_NORFOLK_VA 0.4905

CDU_SAN_DIEGO_CA 0.4316

SIMA_MAYPORT_FL 0.3727

SIMA_NRMF_INGLESIDE_TX 0.3042

NAVSUBSUPPFAC_NEW_LONDON_CT 0.2961

SIMA_PASCAGOULA_MS 0.2842

NAVIMFAC_PACNORWEST_EVERETT_WA 0.2220

NSY_AND_IMF_PUGET_SOUND_DET_SAN_DIEGO_CA 0.1737

NSY_AND_IMF_PUGET_SOUND_DET_PT_LOMA_CA 0.1663

NAVIMFAC_PACNORWEST_BREMERTON_WA 0.0748

Database Date: 4/18/2005 Page 1 of 1 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Page 299: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

R e p

o r t t o t h e D e f e n s e B a s e C l o s u r e a n d R e a l i g n m e n t C o m m i s s i o n

Intelligence Joint Cross-Service Group

Volume IX

May 2005

Page 300: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

IV. Appendices

a. Final Capacity Report, including Results Classified document held separate. This report is available for Commission and the Congress review with the appropriate clearance(s).

b. Final Military Value Report, including Results Classified document held separate. This report is available for Commission and the Congress review with the appropriate clearance(s).

15

Page 301: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

VOLUME X

MEDICAL JOINT-CROSS SERVICE GROUP

2005 BASE CLOSURE AND

REALIGNMENT REPORT

MAY 9, 2005

Page 302: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

14

2.4 COMBINED MILITARY VALUE SCORE

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value FORT_BRAGG 153.55 NMC_PORTSMOUTH 141.51 NMC_SAN_DIEGO 138.11 FORT_SAM_HOUSTON 130.80 LACKLAND_AFB 126.34 PENSACOLA 124.30 FORT_HOOD 123.20 NAVSTA_GREAT_LAKES 115.37 SHEPPARD_AFB 114.27 EGLIN_AFB 112.79 ANDREWS_AFB 111.70 FORT_CARSON 104.86 FORT_LEWIS 104.63 FORT_BELVOIR 101.80 TRAVIS_AFB 100.87 NNMC_BETHESDA 100.34 MCB_CAMP_LEJEUNE 99.73 WALTER_REED_ARMY_MEDICAL_CENTER 98.71 OFFUTT_AFB 98.29 KEESLER_AFB 96.82 BROOKS_CITY-BASE 96.74 MCB_CAMP_PENDLETON 91.42 FORT_CAMPBELL 90.94 FORT_BENNING 89.85 NELLIS_AFB 87.95 SCHOFIELD_BARRACKS 86.11 FORT_JACKSON 85.34 NAVSTA_NORFOLK 85.00 NAS_JACKSONVILLE 83.61 LANGLEY_AFB 82.37 TRIPLER_ARMY_MEDICAL_CENTER 78.19 WRIGHT-PATTERSON_AFB 77.13 FORT_BLISS 76.83 FORT_GORDON 76.68 NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO 75.76 MCB_QUANTICO 75.45 NH_BREMERTON 75.04 FORT_EUSTIS 74.10 FORT_STEWART 73.46 FORT_POLK 69.37 ELMENDORF_AFB 68.21 NWS_YORKTOWN 67.33 FORT_SILL 66.85 FORT_DRUM 66.45 UNITED_STATES_AIR_FORCE_ACADEMY 66.02 MACDILL_AFB 65.20 NAVSTA_PEARL_HARBOR 65.12 SCOTT_AFB 64.30 HOLLOMAN_AFB 63.81 FORT_LEONARD_WOOD 62.44 FORT_MEADE 62.25 FORT_RILEY 62.18 RANDOLPH_AFB 60.83 MAXWELL_AFB 59.41 SHAW_AFB 58.92 HURLBURT_FIELD 58.80 LITTLE_ROCK_AFB 58.60 FORT_RUCKER 58.14 BOLLING_AFB 58.03 WEST_POINT_MIL_RESERVATION 57.97 FORT_LEE 57.62

Page 303: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

15

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value COLUMBUS_AFB 57.49 LUKE_AFB 57.27 MCRD_PARRIS_ISLAND 56.95 FORT_KNOX 56.40 CHARLESTON_AFB 56.39 LAUGHLIN_AFB 55.92 ROBINS_AFB 55.67 TINKER_AFB 55.46 BARKSDALE_AFB 54.80 HILL_AFB 54.20 NAVSTA_NEWPORT 54.14 FORT_DETRICK 53.96 Walter_Reed_Army_Institute_of_Research_-_WRAMC 53.66 FORT_MONROE 52.33 MCCHORD_AFB 51.45 TYNDALL_AFB 50.83 FORT_HUACHUCA 50.78 PETERSON_AFB 50.66 MOODY_AFB 50.59 MCGUIRE_AFB 49.50 NAS_LEMOORE 49.41 DAVIS-MONTHAN_AFB 48.63 NAS_WHIDBEY_ISLAND 48.43 MCAGCC_TWENTYNINE_PALMS 47.90 MCAS_CHERRY_POINT 47.70 NAS_CORPUS_CHRISTI 47.01 FORT_LEAVENWORTH 46.19 WHITEMAN_AFB 45.66 KIRTLAND_AFB 45.55 NTC_AND_FORT_IRWIN_CA 45.30 PATRICK_AFB 44.42 MCCONNELL_AFB 43.79 CARLISLE_BARRACKS 43.73 MOUNTAIN_HOME_AFB 43.44 MALMSTROM_AFB 43.26 POPE_AFB 43.14 DOVER_AFB 42.24 PRESIDIO_OF_MONTEREY 42.24 DYESS_AFB 42.10 ALTUS_AFB 42.05 VANCE_AFB 42.04 CANNON_AFB 41.97 SEYMOUR_JOHNSON_AFB 41.80 NAS_PATUXENT_RIVER 41.32 MINOT_AFB 41.16 FAIRCHILD_AFB 40.77 NH_CHARLESTON 39.34 HICKAM_AFB 39.30 ABERDEEN_PROVING_GROUND 38.75 REDSTONE_ARSENAL 38.30 Army_Medical_Research___Materiel_Command_-_HQ 38.05 VANDENBERG_AFB 37.91 BEALE_AFB 37.57 NAVSTA_MAYPORT 37.53 LOS_ANGELES_AFB 36.74 ELLSWORTH_AFB 36.69 EDWARDS_AFB 35.61 FRANCIS_E__WARREN_AFB 35.15 HANSCOM_AFB 34.68 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_NEW_LONDON 34.18 Army_Medical_Research_Institute_of_Infectious_Diseases 33.78

Page 304: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

16

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value GOODFELLOW_AFB 33.40 EIELSON_AFB 33.12 NAS_NORTH_ISLAND 32.82 NH_GUAM 31.56 NAS_OCEANA 31.49 FORT_MCPHERSON 31.41 BUCKLEY_AFB 31.34 JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_FORT_WORTH 31.17 ROCK_ISLAND_ARSENAL 31.05 NAB_LITTLE_CREEK 31.04 CBC_GULFPORT 30.89 FORT_MONMOUTH 30.53 Naval_Medical_Research_Center_-_Silver_Spring 30.22 FORT_MYER 29.87 FORT_BUCHANAN 29.79 ANDERSEN_AFB 29.68 NAVSTA_ANNAPOLIS 28.68 Army_Medical_Research_Institute_of_Chemical_Defense 28.27 NAS_WHITING_FIELD 28.27 GRAND_FORKS_AFB 28.24 MCAS_STATION_MIRAMAR 28.12 Air_Force_Institute_for_Operational_Health_-_Brooks_City_Base 27.81 ANNISTON_ARMY_DEPOT 27.35 NSA_MILLINGTON 27.33 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_KINGS_BAY 27.30 FORT_MCCOY 27.18 Air_Force_School_of_Aerospace_Medicine 26.85 NAVSTA_PASCAGOULA 26.68 DUGWAY_PROVING_GROUND 26.01 NH_BEAUFORT 25.63 RED_RIVER_ARMY_DEPOT 25.00 SCHRIEVER_AFB 25.00 Naval_Experimental_Diving_Unit_-_Panama_City_FL 24.91 FORT_DIX 24.36 WHITE_SANDS_MISSILE_RANGE 24.29 NSA_NEW_ORLEANS 24.25 FORT_WAINWRIGHT 24.21 Naval_Submarine_Medical_Research_Laboratory 24.07 NAS_POINT_MUGU 23.90 NAVSTA_INGLESIDE 23.76 NWS_CHARLESTON 23.24 WASHINGTON_NAVY_YARD 22.95 Armed_Forces_Radiobiological_Research_Institute 22.86 NAVSTA_BREMERTON 22.81 NSY_NORFOLK 22.36 Naval_Health_Research_Center_-_San_Diego 22.15 CBC_PORT_HUENEME 21.75 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_BANGOR 21.48 FORT_RICHARDSON 21.38 MCAS_YUMA 20.87 NSA_PANAMA_CITY 20.34 Naval_Institute_for_Dental___Biomedical_Research 20.31 MCRD_SAN_DIEGO 20.19 NAB_CORONADO 19.94 Naval_Health_Research_Center_Detachment_-_Wright-Patterson_AFB 19.94 JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_NEW_ORLEANS 19.91 MCAS_NEW_RIVER 19.89 Army_Aeromedical_Research_Laboratory 19.89 NAVSTA_EVERETT 19.65 US_ARMY_GARRISON_SELFRIDGE 19.11 YUMA_PROVING_GROUND 18.50

Page 305: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

17

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value Program_Executive_Office__Joint_Medical_Information_Systems 17.98 Naval_Aerospace_Medical_Research_Laboratory 17.35 Army_Dental_Research_Detachment_-_Great_Lakes 17.17 Army_Medical_Materiel_Agency 17.08 Army_Institute_of_Surgical_Research 16.51 Army_Medical_Materiel_Development_Activity 16.47 NAS_KEY_WEST 15.46 NAS_ATLANTA 15.02 NAS_BRUNSWICK 14.92 Army_Research_Institute_of_Environmental_Medicine 14.07 NAS_KINGSVILLE 13.83 NSWC_DAHLGREN 13.62 NAS_FALLON 13.24 MCB_HAWAII_KANEOHE 13.04 MCLB_ALBANY 12.68 Naval_Health_Research_Center_Detachment_-_Brooks_AFB 12.55 NSCS_ATHENS 12.48 Army_Medical_Research_Detachment_-_Brooks_City_Base 12.32 NSY_PORTSMOUTH 12.29 NSU_SARATOGA_SPRINGS 12.23 311th_Human_Systems_Wing_-_Human_Systems_Program_Office 12.00 NAES_LAKEHURST 11.80 JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_WILLOW_GROVE 11.78 NAS_OCEANA_DAM_NECK_ANNEX 11.75 NSWC_INDIAN_HEAD 11.56 Army_Center_for_Environmental_Health_Research 11.53 Army_Medical_Information_Technology_Center 11.26 NAF_EL_CENTRO 11.00 Navy_Bureau_of_Medicine___Surgery__Code_M2__-_Washington_DC 10.82 MCLB_BARSTOW 10.19 Air_Force_Dental_Investigative_Service_-_Great_Lakes 10.10 Armed_Forces_Institute_of_Pathology 9.28 NAS_MERIDIAN 7.60 Army_Medical_Research_Acquisition_Activity 7.57 MCB_HAWAII_CAMP_SMITH 6.15 NSA_MECHANICSBURG 6.14 Naval_Air_Warfare_Center_-_Pax_River 6.08 NWS_EARLE 4.01 DTRA_CB_Directorate 2.08 Navy_Clothing___Textile_Laboratory_-_Natick_MA 1.23 NWS_SEAL_BEACH 0.80

Page 306: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

18

2.5 COMPOSITE MILITARY VALUE SCORE

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value FORT_BRAGG 65.59 NMC_PORTSMOUTH 60.26 NMC_SAN_DIEGO 58.72 FORT_HOOD 54.68 LACKLAND_AFB 53.39 FORT_SAM_HOUSTON 53.30 FORT_LEWIS 50.24 MCB_CAMP_LEJEUNE 49.95 MCB_CAMP_PENDLETON 47.78 FORT_CAMPBELL 47.73 FORT_CARSON 47.49 PENSACOLA 46.87 SCHOFIELD_BARRACKS 46.49 EGLIN_AFB 45.71 NNMC_BETHESDA 45.34 NAVSTA_GREAT_LAKES 43.82 FORT_BELVOIR 43.56 TRAVIS_AFB 42.87 NAVSTA_NORFOLK 42.19 NAS_JACKSONVILLE 42.18 ANDREWS_AFB 41.59 SHEPPARD_AFB 41.57 NELLIS_AFB 41.56 WALTER_REED_ARMY_MEDICAL_CENTER 41.52 FORT_STEWART 41.08 OFFUTT_AFB 40.77 FORT_BENNING 40.64 MCB_QUANTICO 40.51 FORT_BLISS 39.91 FORT_DRUM 39.87 LANGLEY_AFB 39.33 NAVSTA_PEARL_HARBOR 38.76 FORT_JACKSON 38.68 NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO 38.60 NH_BREMERTON 38.12 TRIPLER_ARMY_MEDICAL_CENTER 37.03 FORT_SILL 36.30 FORT_GORDON 36.30 WRIGHT-PATTERSON_AFB 35.35 FORT_LEONARD_WOOD 35.34 KEESLER_AFB 35.12 MAXWELL_AFB 35.05 FORT_RUCKER 34.89 FORT_LEE 34.57 UNITED_STATES_AIR_FORCE_ACADEMY 34.33 HURLBURT_FIELD 34.33 FORT_EUSTIS 33.58 ROBINS_AFB 33.40 TINKER_AFB 33.27 FORT_POLK 33.11 FORT_MEADE 32.87 ELMENDORF_AFB 32.54 HILL_AFB 32.52 FORT_RILEY 32.07 RANDOLPH_AFB 31.70 FORT_MONROE 31.40 SHAW_AFB 30.95 MCCHORD_AFB 30.87 LUKE_AFB 30.76 HOLLOMAN_AFB 30.69 TYNDALL_AFB 30.50

Page 307: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

19

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value FORT_HUACHUCA 30.47 PETERSON_AFB 30.39 MCRD_PARRIS_ISLAND 30.12 BROOKS_CITY-BASE 29.80 MCGUIRE_AFB 29.70 MOODY_AFB 29.67 NAS_LEMOORE 29.64 DAVIS-MONTHAN_AFB 29.18 FORT_KNOX 29.08 NAS_WHIDBEY_ISLAND 29.06 MCAGCC_TWENTYNINE_PALMS 28.74 MCAS_CHERRY_POINT 28.62 BOLLING_AFB 28.41 LITTLE_ROCK_AFB 28.36 NAS_CORPUS_CHRISTI 28.21 NAVSTA_NEWPORT 28.07 LAUGHLIN_AFB 27.95 MACDILL_AFB 27.87 FORT_DETRICK 27.62 CHARLESTON_AFB 27.62 WHITEMAN_AFB 27.39 PATRICK_AFB 26.65 MCCONNELL_AFB 26.28 CARLISLE_BARRACKS 26.24 BARKSDALE_AFB 26.13 MOUNTAIN_HOME_AFB 26.06 MALMSTROM_AFB 25.95 POPE_AFB 25.88 COLUMBUS_AFB 25.73 KIRTLAND_AFB 25.73 DOVER_AFB 25.34 PRESIDIO_OF_MONTEREY 25.34 DYESS_AFB 25.26 ALTUS_AFB 25.23 CANNON_AFB 25.18 SEYMOUR_JOHNSON_AFB 25.08 NAS_PATUXENT_RIVER 24.79 MINOT_AFB 24.70 SCOTT_AFB 24.58 FAIRCHILD_AFB 24.46 FORT_LEAVENWORTH 23.67 NH_CHARLESTON 23.61 HICKAM_AFB 23.58 NTC_AND_FORT_IRWIN_CA 23.21 REDSTONE_ARSENAL 22.98 VANDENBERG_AFB 22.75 WEST_POINT_MIL_RESERVATION 22.64 BEALE_AFB 22.54 NAVSTA_MAYPORT 22.52 LOS_ANGELES_AFB 22.04 ELLSWORTH_AFB 21.65 EDWARDS_AFB 21.36 FRANCIS_E__WARREN_AFB 21.09 ABERDEEN_PROVING_GROUND 20.85 HANSCOM_AFB 20.81 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_NEW_LONDON 20.51 GOODFELLOW_AFB 20.04 EIELSON_AFB 19.87 NAS_NORTH_ISLAND 19.69 VANCE_AFB 19.62 NWS_YORKTOWN 19.22

Page 308: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

20

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value NAS_OCEANA 18.89 FORT_MCPHERSON 18.84 BUCKLEY_AFB 18.80 JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_FORT_WORTH 18.70 ROCK_ISLAND_ARSENAL 18.63 NAB_LITTLE_CREEK 18.62 CBC_GULFPORT 18.54 FORT_MONMOUTH 18.32 FORT_MYER 17.92 FORT_BUCHANAN 17.87 ANDERSEN_AFB 17.81 NAVSTA_ANNAPOLIS 17.21 NAS_WHITING_FIELD 16.96 GRAND_FORKS_AFB 16.94 MCAS_STATION_MIRAMAR 16.87 ANNISTON_ARMY_DEPOT 16.41 NSA_MILLINGTON 16.40 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_KINGS_BAY 16.38 FORT_MCCOY 16.31 NAVSTA_PASCAGOULA 16.01 NH_GUAM 15.84 RED_RIVER_ARMY_DEPOT 15.00 SCHRIEVER_AFB 15.00 NH_BEAUFORT 14.70 FORT_DIX 14.62 WHITE_SANDS_MISSILE_RANGE 14.57 NSA_NEW_ORLEANS 14.55 FORT_WAINWRIGHT 14.52 NAS_POINT_MUGU 14.34 NAVSTA_INGLESIDE 14.25 NWS_CHARLESTON 13.94 WASHINGTON_NAVY_YARD 13.77 NAVSTA_BREMERTON 13.68 DUGWAY_PROVING_GROUND 13.58 NSY_NORFOLK 13.42 CBC_PORT_HUENEME 13.05 NAVAL_SUB_BASE_BANGOR 12.89 FORT_RICHARDSON 12.83 MCAS_YUMA 12.52 NSA_PANAMA_CITY 12.20 MCRD_SAN_DIEGO 12.12 NAB_CORONADO 11.96 JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_NEW_ORLEANS 11.95 MCAS_NEW_RIVER 11.94 NAVSTA_EVERETT 11.79 US_ARMY_GARRISON_SELFRIDGE 11.46 YUMA_PROVING_GROUND 11.10 Walter_Reed_Army_Institute_of_Research_-_WRAMC 10.73 NAS_KEY_WEST 9.28 NAS_ATLANTA 9.01 NAS_BRUNSWICK 8.95 NAS_KINGSVILLE 8.30 NSWC_DAHLGREN 8.17 NAS_FALLON 7.94 MCB_HAWAII_KANEOHE 7.82 Army_Medical_Research___Materiel_Command_-_HQ 7.61 MCLB_ALBANY 7.61 NSCS_ATHENS 7.49 NSY_PORTSMOUTH 7.37 NSU_SARATOGA_SPRINGS 7.34 NAES_LAKEHURST 7.08

Page 309: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA

21

Installation/Location Numerical Military Value JOINT_RESERVE_BASE_WILLOW_GROVE 7.07 NAS_OCEANA_DAM_NECK_ANNEX 7.05 NSWC_INDIAN_HEAD 6.94 Army_Medical_Research_Institute_of_Infectious_Diseases 6.76 NAF_EL_CENTRO 6.60 MCLB_BARSTOW 6.11 Naval_Medical_Research_Center_-_Silver_Spring 6.04 Army_Medical_Research_Institute_of_Chemical_Defense 5.65 Air_Force_Institute_for_Operational_Health_-_Brooks_City_Base 5.56 Air_Force_School_of_Aerospace_Medicine 5.37 Naval_Experimental_Diving_Unit_-_Panama_City_FL 4.98 Naval_Submarine_Medical_Research_Laboratory 4.81 Armed_Forces_Radiobiological_Research_Institute 4.57 NAS_MERIDIAN 4.56 Naval_Health_Research_Center_-_San_Diego 4.43 Naval_Institute_for_Dental___Biomedical_Research 4.06 Naval_Health_Research_Center_Detachment_-_Wright-Patterson_AFB 3.99 Army_Aeromedical_Research_Laboratory 3.98 MCB_HAWAII_CAMP_SMITH 3.69 NSA_MECHANICSBURG 3.68 Program_Executive_Office__Joint_Medical_Information_Systems 3.60 Naval_Aerospace_Medical_Research_Laboratory 3.47 Army_Dental_Research_Detachment_-_Great_Lakes 3.43 Army_Medical_Materiel_Agency 3.42 Army_Institute_of_Surgical_Research 3.30 Army_Medical_Materiel_Development_Activity 3.29 Army_Research_Institute_of_Environmental_Medicine 2.81 Naval_Health_Research_Center_Detachment_-_Brooks_AFB 2.51 Army_Medical_Research_Detachment_-_Brooks_City_Base 2.46 NWS_EARLE 2.40 311th_Human_Systems_Wing_-_Human_Systems_Program_Office 2.40 Army_Center_for_Environmental_Health_Research 2.31 Army_Medical_Information_Technology_Center 2.25 Navy_Bureau_of_Medicine___Surgery__Code_M2__-_Washington_DC 2.16 Air_Force_Dental_Investigative_Service_-_Great_Lakes 2.02 Armed_Forces_Institute_of_Pathology 1.86 Army_Medical_Research_Acquisition_Activity 1.51 Naval_Air_Warfare_Center_-_Pax_River 1.22 NWS_SEAL_BEACH 0.48 DTRA_CB_Directorate 0.42 Navy_Clothing___Textile_Laboratory_-_Natick_MA 0.25

Page 310: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

SUPPLY AND STORAGE

JOINT-CROSS SERVICE GROUP

2005 BASE CLOSURE AND

REALIGNMENT REPORT

VOLUME XI

Page 311: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

53

Attachment

Supporting Information:

• Potential or known competing recommendations. No conflicting scenarios are noted.

• Force Structure Capabilities. DLA’s ongoing implementation of its Business System Modernization (BSM) effort which replaces a 30 year old materiel management system and the ongoing development of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system will further enhance DLA’s ability to support its customers. BSM and CRM will allow DLA to be much more flexible and responsive in dealing with changing requirements. Nevertheless, throughout the surge in customer requirements, beginning during the build up for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, DLA’s NICPs have been able to provide excellent support. Reviews of the Service Force Structure Plans indicate that greater responsiveness, the ability to interact effectively in joint environments, and more flexible/agile supply chains are key elements of the plans. Operating in relatively stable end strength/funding level environment, especially after the war efforts are completed, is expected to be easier once BSM is fully implemented. In summary, DLA’s full implementation of BSM and CRM should enable effective support in regards to the 20 year Force Structure Plan.

• Military Value Analysis Results: It was the military judgment of the S&S JCSG that

for Consumable Items the Budget/Funding, Contracting, Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, Weapon System Secondary Item Support, Requirements Determination, and Integrated Materiel Management Technical Support service ICP functions should be consolidated under the authority of DLA. The S&S JCSG also decided that Procurement Management and related support functions for the procurement of DLRs would transfer to DLA. Since these functions will be disestablished at every Service ICP location, the relative military value scores of those locations were not determinative. It is the military judgment of the S&S JCSG that this recommendation provides the highest overall military value to the Department. For the relocation of Army ICP functions to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, from Ft. Huachuca, the Army determined that Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, had the highest military value of the relevant locations.

For the relocation of AF ICP functions from Lackland AFB, TX, to Robins AFB, GA, the

AF determined that Robins had the higher military value.

• S&S JCSG Military Value – Criteria and Characteristics: The Supply and Storage (S&S) JCSG’s approach divides the DOD supply and storage activities into three core functions: supply, storage, and distribution. Inventory Control Points were defined as activities that perform the Supply core function. For each of military value criteria, the S&S JCSG developed “characteristics” that bring a supply system context to the criteria by integrating the core functions (supply, storage, and distribution). The weighting of criteria constitutes the first-order weighting of military value and

Page 312: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

54

provides the foundation for the attributes, metrics, and questions developed by the S&S JCSG. The criteria, weighting and supply characteristics are provided below.

• Criterion 1 (35%): The current and future mission capabilities and the impact on

operational readiness of the Department of Defense's total force of the Department of Defense, including the impact on joint warfighting, training, and readiness. Characteristic. Use modern and flexible inventory management processes to support and enhance operational readiness, as defined by requirements determination, acquisition, and stock control.

• Criterion 2 (20%): The availability and condition of land, facilities, and associated

airspace (including training areas suitable for maneuver by ground, naval, or air forces throughout a diversity of climate and terrain areas and staging areas for the use of the Armed Forces in homeland defense missions) at both existing and potential receiving locations. Characteristic. Operate from modern, efficient, and expandable infrastructure that enhances the inventory management process.

• Criterion 3 (35%): The ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization, surge,

and future total force requirements at both existing and potential receiving locations to support operations and training. Characteristic. A modern, flexible inventory management capability with sufficient capacity to adapt to future requirements as defined by personnel, information technology (IT), and infrastructure.

• Criterion 4 (10%): The cost of operations and the manpower implications.

Characteristic. Manage inventory processes to minimize cost and manpower requirements.

S&S JCSG Military Value Scores and Ranking for all ICPs

Name of Activity Military Score Military Value Ranking Hill AFB 0.2090 1 of 16

Fort Monmouth 0.2035 2 of 16 NAVICP Philadelphia 0.1994 3 of 16

Robins AFB 0.1956 4 of 16 DSC Columbus 0.1909 5 of 16

NAVICP Mechanicsburg 0.1884 6 of 16

Tinker AFB 0.1855 7 of 16 Redstone Arsenal 0.1793 8 of 16 DSC Richmond 0.1778 9 of 16 MCLB Albany 0.1770 10 of 16 Detroit Arsenal 0.1701 11 of 16

Rock Island 0.1666 12 of 16 DSC Philadelphia 0.1588 13 of 16

Lackland AFB 0.0853 14 of 16

Page 313: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

55

Fort Huachuca 0.0722 15 of 16 Soldier System Center 0.0301 16 of 16

Army Overall Military Value Scores and Rankings for Army Installations

Name of Activity Military Score Military Ranking

Ft Bliss 6.20 1 of 88 Ft Lewis 5.71 2 of 88 Ft Hood 5.66 3 of 88 Ft Stewart 5.43 4 of 88 Ft Bragg 5.33 5 of 88 Yuma Proving Ground 5.28 6 of 88 Dugway Proving Ground 5.23 7 of 88 Ft Carson 5.22 8 of 88 Ft Benning 5.20 9 of 88 White Sands Missile Range 5.13 10 of 88 Ft Wainwright 5.06 11 of 88 Ft Knox 4.88 12 of 88 Ft Riley 4.86 13 of 88 Ft Campbell 4.80 14 of 88 Ft Drum 4.68 15 of 88 Ft Polk 4.64 16 of 88 Ft Irwin 4.53 17 of 88 Aberdeen Proving Ground 4.16 18 of 88 Name of Activity Overall Military Score Military Ranking Ft Sill 4.00 19 of 88 Schofield Barracks 3.92 20 of 88 Ft Huachuca 3.82 21 of 88 Ft AP Hill 3.68 22 of 88 Ft Dix 3.45 23 of 88 Anniston Army Depot 3.19 24 of 88 Ft McCoy 3.18 25 of 88 Ft Jackson 3.12 26 of 88 McAlester Army Ammo Plant 3.10 27 of 88 Ft Rucker 3.06 28 of 88 Ft Richardson 2.98 29 of 88 Redstone Arsenal 2.97 30 of 88 Hawthorne Army Depot 2.94 31 of 88 Crane Army Depot 2.90 32 of 88 Ft Eustis 2.90 33 of 88 Ft Lee 2.79 34 of 88 Ft Leonard Wood 2.78 35 of 88 Ft Gordon 2.78 36 of 88 Tobyhanna Army Depot 2.77 37 of 88 Ft Belvoir 2.68 38 of 88

Page 314: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

56

Letterkenny Army Depot 2.67 39 of 88 Red River Army Depot 2.61 40 of 88 Tooele Army Depot 2.48 41 of 88 Sierra Army Depot 2.48 42 of 88 Ft Sam Huston 2.40 43 of 88 Deseret Chem Plant 2.35 44 of 88 Bluegrass Army Depot 2.34 45 of 88 Walter Reed Army Med Ctr 2.34 46 of 88 Picatinny Arsenal 2.31 47 of 88 Watervliet Arsenal 2.26 48 of 88 Ft Meade 2.25 49 of 88 Ft Monmouth 2.25 50 of 88 Ft McPherson 2.23 51 of 88 Ft Gillen 2.21 52 of 88 Rock Island Arsenal 2.14 54 of 88 MOT Sunny Point 2.10 55 of 88 Pueblo Chem Depot 2.01 56 of 88 Ft Detrick 1.00 57 of 88 Soldier Support Center 1.94 58 of 88 Charles Kelley Supt 1.91 59 of 88 Milan Army Ammo Plant 1.90 60 of 88 Mississippi Army Ammo Plant 1.88 61 of 88 West Point 1.87 62 of 88 Pine Buff Arsenal 1.68 63 of 88 Ft Leavenworth 1.85 64 of 88 Ft Mc Nair 1.83 65 of 88 Newport Chem Depot 1.83 66 of 88 Ft Myer 1.82 67 of 88 Ft Monroe 1.80 68 of 88 Kansas Army Ammo Plant 1.79 69 of 88 Lake City Army Ammo Plant 1.77 70 of 88 Iowa Army Ammo Plant 1.76 71 of 88 Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant

1.72 72 of 88

Adelphi Labs 1.69 73 of 88 Ft Hamilton 1.68 74 of 88 Detroit Arsenal 1.64 75 of 88 Carlisle 1.63 76 of 88 Corpus Christi Army Depot Activity

1.60 77 of 88

Lima Tank Plant 1.59 78 of 88 Scranton Army Ammo Plant 1.53 79 of 88 USAG Selfridge 1.52 80 of 88 Radford Army Ammo Plant 1.50 81 of 88 Ft Shafter 1.48 82 of 88

Page 315: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

57

Ft Buchanan 1.46 83 of 88 Holston Army Ammo Plant 1.43 84 of 88 Presidio of Monterey 1.34 85 of 88 Umatilla Chem Depot 1.30 86 of 88 Tripler Army Med Ctr 1.25 87 of 88 Riverbank Army Ammo Plant 1.18 88 of 88

Air Force Military Value Scores and Rankings for Air Force Logistics Activities

Name of Activity Military

Score

Military Value Ranking

Robins AFB-NICP 0.1067 1 of 79

Hill AFB-NICP 0.1066 2 of 79

Tinker AFB-NICP 0.1025 3 of 79

Eglin AFB-LRS-Active 0.0901 4 of 79

Little Rock AFB-LRS-Active 0.0851 5 of 79

Laughlin AFB-LRS-Active 0.0837 6 of 79

Wright-Patterson AFB-LRS-Active 0.0813 7 of 79

Holloman AFB-LRS-Active 0.0781 8 of 79

Sheppard AFB-LRS-Active 0.0764 9 of 79

Travis AFB-LRS-Active 0.0742 10 of 79

Tyndall AFB-LRS-Active 0.0704 11 0f 79

Luke AFB-LRS-Active 0.0686 12 of 79

Shaw AFB-LRS-Active 0.0685 13 of 79

McCord AFB-LRS-Active 0.0675 14 of 79

Tinker AFB-LRS-Active 0.0643 15 of 79

Columbus AFB-LRS-Active 0.0643 16 of 79

Barksdale AFB-LRS-Active 0.0642 17 of 79

Ellsworth AFB-LRS-Active 0.0636 18 of 79

Malmstrom AFB-LRS-Active 0.0631 19 of 79

Charleston AFB-LRS-Active 0.0628 20 of 79

Dyess AFB-LRS-Active 0.0624 21 of 79

Elmendorf AFB-LRS-Active 0.0624 22 of 79

Langley AFB-LRS-Active 0.0619 23 of 79

Offutt AFB-LRS-Active 0.0593 24 of 79

Hill AFB-Depot Supply 0.0590 25 of 79

Page 316: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

58

Name of Activity Military

Score Military Value Ranking

Nellis AFB-LRS-Active 0.0587 26 of 79

Vance AFB-LRS-Active 0.0583 27 of 79

Fairchild AFB-LRS-Active 0.0581 28 of 79

Francis E. Warren AFB-LRS-Active 0.0578 29 of 79

Patrick AFB-LRS-Active 0.0566 30 of 79

Hurlburt Field-LRS-Active 0.0565 31 of 79

Seymour Johnson AFB-LRS-Active 0.0548 32 of 79

Tinker AFB-Depot Supply 0.0547 33 of 79

Kirtland AFB-LRS-Active 0.0544 34 of 79

Robins AFB-Depot Supply 0.0542 35 of 79

Altus AFB-LRS-Active 0.0537 36 of 79

Robins AFB-LRS-Active 0.0534 37 of 79

Dover AFB-LRS-Active 0.0533 38 of 79

Edwards AFB-LRS-Active 0.0526 39 of 79

Mountain Home AFB-LRS-Active 0.0523 40 of 79

McConnell AFB-LRS-Active 0.0521 41 of 79

Vandenberg AFB-LRS-Active 0.0508 42 of 79

Peterson AFB-LRS-Active 0.0507 43 of 79

Whiteman AFB-LRS-Active 0.0507 44 of 79

Hill AFB-LRS-Active 0.0498 45 of 79

Eielson AFB-LRS-Active 0.0485 46 of 79

Cannon AFB-LRS-Active 0.0484 47 of 79

Randolph AFB-LRS-Active 0.0482 48 of 79

Beale AFB-LRS-Active 0.0460 49 of 79

Davis-Monthan AFB-Depot Supply 0.0452 50 of 79

Keesler AFB-LRS-Active 0.0445 51 of 79

Andrews AFB-LRS-Active 0.0433 52 of 79

Scott AFB-LRS-Active 0.0429 53 of 79

Andersen AFB-LRS-Active 0.0417 54 of 79

Minot AFB-LRS-Active 0.0414 55 of 79

Pope AFB-LRS-Active 0.0408 56 of 79

Page 317: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 318: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 319: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 320: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 321: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,
Page 322: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

TECHNICAL JOINT CROSS SERVICE GROUP

ANALYSES

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(VOLUME XII)

19 May 2005

Page 323: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-15

Table 3.1: Air Platforms D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.6556 2 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.5303 3 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.3901 4 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.2859 5 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.2464 6 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.1845 7 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.1829 8 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.1621 9 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.1520 10 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.1459 11 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.1452 12 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.1426 13 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1412 14 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1387 15 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1363 16 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1343 17 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.1329 18 23460 USN USN_2_VABEACH. 0.1325 19 92135 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1311 20 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.1302 21 92145 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.1292 22 98278 USN USN_3_Oak Harbor 0.1291 23 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1273 24 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1211 25 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1100 26 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1099 27 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.1055 28 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.1002 29 94035 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL Moffett Field 0.0975 30 22205 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Arlington 0.0932 31 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0915 32 96863 USN NATEC_SAN_DIEGO_CA KANEOHE BAY 0.0899 33 76217 USN NATEC_SAN_DIEGO_CA FORT WORTH 0.0899 34 33205 USN DET NATEC CHERRY POINT 0.0899 35 04011 USN DET NATEC BRUNSWICK 0.0899 36 93246 USN USN_2_Lemoore 0.0899 37 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.0899 38 30060 USN DET NATEC ATLANTA 0.0899

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 324: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-16

Table 3.1: Air Platforms D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 29904 USN DET NATEC BEAUFORT 0.0899 40 28545 USN USN_2_Camp Lejeune 0.0899 41 85369 USN YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0899 42 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0840 43 28533 USN USN_3_Cherry Point 0.0827 44 45433 USN USN_3_Wright-Pat 0.0817 45 23451 USN DET NATEC VIRGINA BEACH 0.0813 46 20762 USN DET NATEC WASHINGTON 0.0813 47 12550 USN DET NATEC STEWART ANGB NY 0.0813 48 19090 USN DET NATEC WILLOW GROVE 0.0813 49 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0813 50 19103 USN DET NATEC NAVICP 0.0813 51 70143 USN DET NATEC NEW ORLEANS 0.0813 52 32228 USN USN-2_Mayport 0.0813 53 78418 USN NATEC_SAN_DIEGO_CA CORPUS CHRISTI 0.0813 54 15902 USN DET NATEC JOHNSTOWN 0.0813 55 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0713 56 32544 USAF HURLBURT FIELD AAF 0.0709 57 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.0585 58 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0580 59 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0580 60 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0578 61 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0577 62 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0576 63 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0575 64 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0575 65 85706 USAF Tucson IAP AGS 0.0575 66 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.0575 67 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0575

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 325: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-17

Table 3.2: Air Platforms Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.6556 2 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.5180 3 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3108 4 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2441 5 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.2378 6 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.2333 7 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2011 8 44135 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER CLEVELAND 0.1667 9 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.1604 10 23681 USA USA_2_Hampton (W26201-Langley) 0.1578 11 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.1567 12 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.1349 13 94035 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL Moffett Field 0.1258 14 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1179 15 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1062 16 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1062 17 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1013 18 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0977 19 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.0959 20 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0885 21 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0762 22 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.0746 23 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0665 24 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0572 25 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0510 26 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0507 27 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0357 28 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0356 29 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0354 30 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.0353 31 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0351 32 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0350 33 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0350 34 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0350 35 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0350

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 326: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-18

Table 3.3: Air Platforms T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.6377 2 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.5251 3 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.5137 4 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.4821 5 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.4476 6 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.3895 7 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.3550 8 89191 USAF NELLIS AFB 0.3410 9 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.3355 10 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.3119 11 28310 USA FORT BRAGG 0.3064 12 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.2521 13 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.1334 14 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.0966 15 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0805 16 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.0698 17 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.0689 18 85706 USAF Tucson IAP AGS 0.0638 19 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0618 20 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0615 21 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0593 22 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0584 23 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0571 24 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0567 25 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0566 26 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0564 27 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0561 28 22202 USA USA_4_Arlington 0.0547 29 71110 USAF Barksdale AFB 0.0516 30 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0497 31 78148 USAF Randolph AFB 0.0480 32 32544 USAF HURLBURT FIELD AAF 0.0468 33 30069 USAF Dobbins ARB 0.0452 34 20670 USAF USAF_4_Pax 0.0452 35 89496 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Fallon 0.0449 36 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0440 37 22205 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Arlington 0.0430 38 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0430

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 327: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-19

Table 3.3: Air Platforms T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0382 40 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0334 41 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0316 42 08640 USAF Air Mobility Warfare Center (AMCW) 0.0307 43 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.0305 44 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0295 45 20903 USAF Tunnel 9 White Oak 0.0294 46 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.0291 47 93550 USAF USAF_2_Palmdale (AF PLANT 41) 0.0290 48 85613 DISA JITC Fort Huachuca 0.0287 49 89070 USAF Eglin AFB Indian Springs 0.0286 50 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0286 51 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0286 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 328: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-20

Table 3.4: Battlespace Environments D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.4394 2 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.4276 3 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.3800 4 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.2594 5 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.2577 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2305 7 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.2299 8 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1566 9 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1537 10 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1141 11 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0966 12 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0760 13 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0725 14 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0523 15 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0456 16 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0258 17 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0176 18 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0157 19 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0155 20 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0150 21 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0150 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 329: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-21

Table 3.5: Battlespace Environments Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.8189 2 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.5133 3 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.3662 4 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2633 5 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2300 6 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.2293 7 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1894 8 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1836 9 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.1787 10 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1662 11 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1565 12 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.1241 13 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1215 14 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0762 15 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0739 16 22320 USA ARO FT Belvoir 0.0733 17 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.0733 18 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0536 19 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0529 20 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0520 21 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0188 22 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0173 23 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0124 24 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0041 25 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0040 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 330: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-22

Table 3.6: Battlespace Environments T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2488 2 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.1852 3 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1176 4 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.1077 5 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0991 6 92147 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0833 7 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0768 8 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0742 9 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0737 10 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0686 11 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0577 12 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0421 13 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0411 14 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0353 15 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0350 16 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0336 17 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0297 18 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.0282 19 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0280 20 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0213 21 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0210 22 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0210 23 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0210 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 331: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-23

Table 3.7: Biomedical D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.7143 2 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1671 3 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1570 4 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1525 5 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1200 6 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1200 7 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0755 8 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.0544 9 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0349 10 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0215 11 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0208 12 92145 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0150 13 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0150 14 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0150 15 20910 USN NAVMEDRSCHCEN_SILVER_SPRING_MD 0.0150

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 332: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-24

Table 3.8: Biomedical Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.4622 2 20910 USA WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER 0.4015 3 96718 USA TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER Pohakuloa 0.3979 4 96857 USA Schofield Barracks 0.3979 5 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.3916 6 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3524 7 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.2460 8 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2448 9 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2279 10 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.2196 11 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1896 12 20910 USN NAVMEDRSCHCEN_SILVER_SPRING_MD 0.1783 13 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.1695 14 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.1514 15 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1454 16 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1429 17 60088 USA USA_2_Great Lakes 0.1341 18 78235 USA US Medical Research Detachment Brooks-City Base 0.1128 19 39534 USAF USAF_2_Biloxi 0.0875 20 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.0768 21 78235 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA BROOKS 0.0733 22 45433 USN USN_3_Wright-Pat 0.0733 23 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.0523 24 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.0521 25 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0520 26 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0478 27 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.0190 28 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0099 29 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0040 30 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0040

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 333: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-25

Table 3.9: Biomedical T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.2770 2 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2521 3 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.2202 4 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1647 5 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.1593 6 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.1153 7 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1041 8 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1041 9 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.0662 10 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0547 11 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.0490 12 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.0388 13 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.0374 14 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0359 15 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0282 16 78235 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA BROOKS 0.0274 17 20910 USN NAVMEDRSCHCEN_SILVER_SPRING_MD 0.0270 18 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0270 19 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0270 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 334: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-26

Table 3.10: Chemical Biological Defense D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.4654 2 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.4211 3 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.2787 4 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.2230 5 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.2171 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2121 7 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2067 8 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.1936 9 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.1845 10 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.1686 11 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1584 12 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.1563 13 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.1215 14 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1192 15 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1003 16 20910 USN NAVMEDRSCHCEN_SILVER_SPRING_MD 0.0990 17 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0818 18 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0600 19 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.0524 20 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0523 21 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.0389 22 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0366 23 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0366 24 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0366 25 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.0366 26 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0366 27 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0338 28 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0258 29 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0245 30 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0218 31 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0187 32 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.0182 33 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0177 34 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0162 35 60088 USA USA_2_Great Lakes 0.0156 36 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0154 37 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.0150 38 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0150 39 90245 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA EL SEGUNDO 0.0150 40 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0150

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 335: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-27

Table 3.11: Chemical Biological Defense Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.5890 2 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.4690 3 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3607 4 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.3252 5 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.2761 6 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.2257 7 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2223 8 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.2053 9 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.2006 10 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1603 11 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.1579 12 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1516 13 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1305 14 20910 USN NAVMEDRSCHCEN_SILVER_SPRING_MD 0.1217 15 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.1205 16 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.0830 17 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0700 18 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0700 19 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0700 20 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0521 21 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.0379 22 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0336 23 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.0188 24 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0188 25 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.0188 26 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0188 27 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.0188 28 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0188 29 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0184 30 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0171 31 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0124 32 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0083 33 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0071 34 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0057 35 20910 USA WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER 0.0055 36 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.0046 37 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0040 38 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0040 39 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0040 40 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0040 41 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0040 42 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0040 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 336: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-28

Table 3.12: Chemical Biological Defense T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.6308 2 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.2678 3 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1757 4 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1349 5 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1345 6 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.1242 7 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.0936 8 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0881 9 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0795 10 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.0793 11 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0750 12 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0750 13 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0750 14 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0749 15 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.0703 16 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0614 17 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0600 18 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0333 19 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0330 20 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0287 21 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.0252 22 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.0250 23 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0250 24 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0250 25 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.0250 26 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0250 27 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.0236 28 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0225 29 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0224 30 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0219 31 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.0202 32 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0200 33 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.0188 34 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0179 35 99703 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND Ft. Wainwright 0.0152 36 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0150 37 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0150 38 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0150 39 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0150

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 337: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-29

Table 3.13: Ground Vehicles D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.5644 2 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.3099 3 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2301 4 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2206 5 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.2206 6 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.1863 7 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1584 8 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1574 9 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.1514 10 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1459 11 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1453 12 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1256 13 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.1141 14 22192 USN DRPM_AAA_WASHINGTON_DC 0.1020 15 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0932 16 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0930 17 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0928 18 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.0835 19 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0823 20 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0655 21 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0593 22 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0589 23 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0584 24 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0575 25 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0575 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 338: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-30

Table 3.14: Ground Vehicles Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.7225 2 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.3505 3 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2304 4 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2131 5 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1485 6 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1284 7 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1176 8 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1167 9 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0930 10 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0909 11 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0773 12 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0764 13 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.0630 14 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0491 15 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.0443 16 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0367 17 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0363 18 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0358 19 44135 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER CLEVELAND 0.0357 20 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.0354 21 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0351 22 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.0350 23 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0350 24 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0350 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 339: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-31

Table 3.15: Ground Vehicles T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.6844 2 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.4784 3 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.4144 4 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.3488 5 73503 USA FT SILL 0.3279 6 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.2312 7 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1018 8 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1010 9 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.0708 10 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0666 11 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0653 12 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0626 13 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0626 14 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0611 15 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0548 16 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0511 17 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0449 18 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0430 19 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.0392 20 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0382 21 99703 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND Ft. Wainwright 0.0302 22 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0301 23 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.0296 24 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0288 25 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0288 26 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0286 27 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0286

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 340: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-32

Table 3.16: Human Systems D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.6529 2 32826 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL 0.5869 3 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3664 4 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.3286 5 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.3251 6 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.2907 7 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.2591 8 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.2447 9 70145 USN SPAWARINFOTECHCEN_NEW_ORLEANS_LA 0.2436 10 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.2269 11 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.2175 12 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.1794 13 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1774 14 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.1774 15 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1493 16 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1329 17 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1295 18 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1290 19 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.1244 20 20370 USN SPAWARINFOTECHCEN_NEW_ORLEANS_LA 0.1202 21 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1201 22 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.1200 23 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1200 24 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.1200 25 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1200 26 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.1200 27 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.1200 28 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.1200 29 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1200 30 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.1143 31 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.1104 32 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.1099 33 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1098 34 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0872 35 38053 USN SPAWARINFOTECHCEN DET MEMPHIS 0.0821 36 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0778 37 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0724 38 96563 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL MCBH 0.0724

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 341: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-33

Table 3.16: Human Systems D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 92136 USN USN_3_San Diego 0.0724 40 96860 USN USN_2_Pearl Harbor 0.0724 41 60088 USN USN_2_Great Lakes 0.0724 42 32570 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Milton 0.0724 43 92145 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0724 44 92132 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL San Diego 0.0724 45 92147 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0724 46 93246 USN USN_2_Lemoore 0.0724 47 92135 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0724 48 78363 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Kingsville 0.0724 49 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.0724 50 78419 USN USN_2_Corpus Christi 0.0724 51 06349 USN New London (Undersea/Sub Sch) 0.0724 52 20003 USN NAVSEA (PMS-378 Future Carriers) 0.0724 53 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0724 54 28533 USN USN_3_Cherry Point 0.0724 55 28542 USN USN_2_Camp Lejeune 0.0724 56 28545 USN USN_2_Camp Lejeune 0.0724 57 28547 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Camp 0.0724 58 98315 USN USN_2_Bangor 0.0724 59 23551 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Norfolk 0.0724 60 98278 USN USN_3_Oak Harbor 0.0724 61 23521 USN USN_2_Norfolk 0.0724 62 32228 USN USN-2_Mayport 0.0724 63 73145 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Tinker AFB 0.0724 64 85212 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Mesa 0.0724 65 92278 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Twenty Nine 0.0724 66 39309 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL Meridian 0.0724 67 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0724 68 31547 USN USN_2_Kings Bay 0.0724 69 32003 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL TSD 0.0724 70 92106 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0724 71 23460 USN USN_2_VABEACH. 0.0724 72 93044 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0724 73 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0523 74 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0347 75 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0337 76 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0337

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 342: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-34

Table 3.16: Human Systems D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 77 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0274 78 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0240 79 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0190 80 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0175 81 19111 USN USN-2-Philadelphia 0.0156 82 66027 USA FT LEAVENWORTH 0.0151 83 22041 DISA DISA Development and Acquisition 0.0150 84 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0150 85 99737 MDA MDA - Alaska 0.0150 86 85212 USAF USAF_2_Mesa (AFRL MESA) 0.0150 87 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0150 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 343: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-35

Table 3.17: Human Systems Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.6502 2 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.5101 3 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.4240 4 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.4053 5 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3894 6 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3553 7 22202 USA USA_4_Arlington 0.3399 8 85212 USAF USAF_2_Mesa (AFRL MESA) 0.3243 9 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.3240 10 32826 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL 0.3157 11 32407 USN USN_2_Panama City 0.2731 12 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2580 13 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.2417 14 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.2195 15 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.2180 16 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.2129 17 66027 USA FT LEAVENWORTH 0.1784 18 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.1777 19 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.1690 20 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.1635 21 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1476 22 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.1412 23 96718 USA TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER Pohakuloa 0.1393 24 96857 USA Schofield Barracks 0.1393 25 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.1182 26 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1180 27 40121 USA FORT KNOX 0.1144 28 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.1006 29 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.0849 30 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0803 31 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0768 32 22320 USA ARO FT Belvoir 0.0747 33 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.0741 34 65473 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER FT LEONARDWOOD 0.0738 35 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.0735 36 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0735 37 28310 USA FORT BRAGG 0.0735 38 31905 USA FT BENNING 0.0735

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 344: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-36

Table 3.17: Human Systems Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 30905 USA FT GORDON 0.0735 40 79916 USA FT BLISS 0.0735 41 73503 USA FT SILL 0.0735 42 76544 USA FT HOOD 0.0735 43 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.0735 44 45433 USN USN_3_Wright-Pat 0.0733 45 83725 USA Army G-1 BOISE 0.0733 46 28307 USA Army G-1 ARI 0.0733 47 31995 USA FT BENNING 0.0733 48 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0703 49 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.0700 50 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.0700 51 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.0700 52 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.0700 53 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0700 54 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.0700 55 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0700 56 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0700 57 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0700 58 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.0700 59 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0520 60 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0520 61 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0280 62 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0188 63 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.0158 64 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0064 65 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0040

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 345: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-37

Table 3.18: Human Systems T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.5649 2 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.5466 3 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.4004 4 32826 USN NAVAIRWARCENTRASYSDIV_ORLANDO_FL 0.3988 5 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.3503 6 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.3211 7 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.3119 8 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.3066 9 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.2636 10 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.2467 11 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.2284 12 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.2282 13 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.2121 14 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2028 15 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.1991 16 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.1640 17 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1537 18 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1535 19 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.1418 20 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1362 21 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1350 22 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.1350 23 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.1350 24 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1350 25 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1350 26 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1350 27 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1192 28 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1127 29 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.1044 30 79607 USAF Eglin AFB Abilene 0.0975 31 71110 USAF Barksdale AFB 0.0970 32 65336 USAF USAF_2_Knob Noster 0.0967 33 85013 USAF Eglin AFB Phoenix 0.0964 34 68113 USAF USAF_2_Omaha 0.0956 35 85201 USAF Eglin AFB Mesa City 0.0955 36 31201 USAF Eglin AFB 29 TSS, OLB 0.0953 37 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0632 38 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0631

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 346: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-38

Table 3.18: Human Systems T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0541 40 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0457 41 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0451 42 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0450 43 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.0377 44 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0362 45 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0330 46 99703 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND Ft. Wainwright 0.0284 47 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0270 48 85212 USAF USAF_2_Mesa (AFRL MESA) 0.0270 49 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0270 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 347: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-39

Table 3.19: Information Systems Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.5941 2 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.4845 3 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.4742 4 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.4502 5 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.4398 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3108 7 22041 DISA DISA Development and Acquisition 0.3006 8 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.2956 9 98433 USA Fort Lewis 0.2933 10 92110 USA FORT MONMOUTH San Diego 0.2933 11 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2808 12 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.2552 13 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2330 14 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.2273 15 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.2268 16 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.2264 17 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.2202 18 76544 USA FT HOOD 0.2187 19 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.2160 20 30905 USA FT GORDON 0.2158 21 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.2014 22 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.1989 23 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.1929 24 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1894 25 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1890 26 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.1884 27 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.1870 28 92136 USN USN_3_San Diego 0.1833 29 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1821 30 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1815 31 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1815 32 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1810 33 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1781 34 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.1758 35 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.1733 36 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.1732 37 21702 USA FORT DETRICK 0.1691 38 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.1659

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 348: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-40

Table 3.19: Information Systems Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1653 40 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1622 41 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1622 42 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.1575 43 78243 USAF Lackland AFB 0.1544 44 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.1471 45 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1457 46 23801 USA Fort Lee 0.1389 47 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.1313 48 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.1302 49 90001 USA FORT MONMOUTH Los Angeles 0.1301 50 31088 USA Warner Robbins AFB 0.1301 51 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1296 52 79916 USA FT BLISS 0.1294 53 20310 USA JPM JTRS 0.1294 54 46802 USA FORT MONMOUTH Fort Wayne 0.1294 55 92135 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1294 56 01731 USA ESC CIPO 0.1294 57 23691 USN USN_3_Yorktown (WPNSTA_Yorktown) 0.1294 58 22331 USA CECOM Acquisition Center- Washington 0.1294 59 33621 USA CERDEC Tampa Field Ofc 0.1294 60 73503 USA FT SILL 0.1294 61 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1294 62 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.1263 63 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1257 64 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.1146 65 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.1127 66 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1113 67 36112 USAF Hanscom AFB Montgomery 0.1005 68 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.1000 69 80914 USAF Peterson AFB 0.0999 70 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0994 71 70145 USN SPAWARINFOTECHCEN_NEW_ORLEANS_LA 0.0964 72 01735 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0920 73 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0867 74 90245 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA EL SEGUNDO 0.0860 75 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0860 76 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0834

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 349: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-41

Table 3.19: Information Systems Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 77 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.0820 78 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0820 79 19111 USN USN-2-Philadelphia 0.0784 80 33607 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston - Tampa 0.0780 81 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.0772 82 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0756 83 35758 USA PM TOC/AMDCCS 0.0746 84 22202 USA USA_4_Arlington 0.0733 85 24143 USA FORT BELVOIR PM ALTESS 0.0727 86 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0723 87 98101 USAF Hanscom AFB Seattle 0.0722 88 07703 USN SPAWARSYSCOM HQ - DET FT. MONMOUTH 0.0721 89 68113 USAF USAF_2_Omaha 0.0721 90 92145 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0721 91 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0721 92 20001 USAF USAF_5_DC 0.0720 93 92101 USAF USAF_2_San Diego 0.0720 94 22201 USAF USAF_3_Arlington 0.0720 95 07703 USAF Hanscom AFB CX 0.0720 96 32801 USAF Hanscom AFB Orlando 0.0720 97 32544 USAF HURLBURT FIELD AAF 0.0720 98 01731 USN SPAWARSYSCOM HQ - DET HANSCOMB AFB 0.0720 99 62225 USAF SCOTT AFB 0.0720 100 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0720 101 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0720 102 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0720 103 85613 DISA JITC Fort Huachuca 0.0720 104 20640 DISA JITC Indian Head 0.0720 105 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0720

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 350: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-42

Table 3.20: Information Systems Technology Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.6059 2 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.6053 3 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.4574 4 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.3921 5 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.3826 6 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.3671 7 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3336 8 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.2985 9 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.2959 10 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.2911 11 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.2864 12 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.2743 13 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.2563 14 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.2563 15 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2502 16 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2452 17 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.2420 18 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.2145 19 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.2075 20 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.1898 21 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.1865 22 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1849 23 20910 USA WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER 0.1527 24 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1518 25 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.1516 26 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.1512 27 30301 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER ARL CIS 0.1509 28 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1509 29 96857 USA Schofield Barracks 0.1509 30 22331 USA CECOM Acquisition Center- Washington 0.1509 31 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1509 32 96718 USA TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER Pohakuloa 0.1509 33 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.1509 34 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1291 35 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.1179 36 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.1138 37 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.1089 38 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.0970

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 351: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-43

Table 3.20: Information Systems Technology Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 78243 USAF Lackland AFB 0.0949 40 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0787 41 32508 USN USN_3_Pensacola 0.0787 42 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0787 43 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0783 44 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0752 45 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0744 46 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0740 47 22041 DISA DISA Development and Acquisition 0.0651 48 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0630 49 92110 USA FORT MONMOUTH San Diego 0.0623 50 98433 USA Fort Lewis 0.0623 51 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0619 52 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0603 53 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0593 54 19111 USN USN-2-Philadelphia 0.0580 55 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0489 56 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0428 57 66027 USA FT LEAVENWORTH 0.0426 58 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.0423 59 92186 USN NAVHLTHRSCHCEN_SAN_DIEGO_CA SAN DIEGO 0.0422 60 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0421 61 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0420 62 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.0420 63 36112 USAF Hanscom AFB Montgomery 0.0420 64 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0420 65 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0420 66 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0420 67 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0420 68 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.0420

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 352: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-44

Table 3.21: Information Systems Technology T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 85613 DISA JITC Fort Huachuca 0.4397 2 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.3922 3 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3812 4 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.3629 5 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.3611 6 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.3504 7 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.3174 8 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.3050 9 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.2949 10 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.2840 11 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.2789 12 73503 USA FT SILL 0.2560 13 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.2516 14 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2454 15 92147 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.2345 16 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.2241 17 20640 DISA JITC Indianhead 0.2205 18 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.2171 19 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.2008 20 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1991 21 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.1960 22 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1956 23 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1881 24 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.1833 25 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.1769 26 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1767 27 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1729 28 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1637 29 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.1564 30 78148 USAF Randolph AFB 0.1535 31 32904 USAF USAF_2_Melbourne 0.1452 32 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.1445 33 89191 USAF NELLIS AFB 0.1411 34 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1407 35 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.1405 36 98433 USA Fort Lewis 0.1405 37 92110 USA FORT MONMOUTH San Diego 0.1405 38 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1405

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 353: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-45

Table 3.21: Information Systems Technology T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.1400 40 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.1293 41 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.1267 42 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.1233 43 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.1131 44 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1122 45 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.1075 46 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.1054 47 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.1042 48 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0978 49 79916 USA FT BLISS 0.0957 50 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0944 51 78234 USA FT SAM HOUSTON 0.0858 52 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0855 53 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0855 54 19111 USN USN-2-Philadelphia 0.0854 55 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0841 56 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0827 57 36112 USAF Hanscom AFB Montgomery 0.0813 58 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0801 59 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0796 60 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.0796 61 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.0787 62 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0781 63 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0771 64 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0766 65 78243 USAF Lackland AFB 0.0765 66 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0765 67 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0765 68 06357 USN NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET Niantic 0.0765 69 20903 USAF Tunnel 9 White Oak 0.0765 70 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0765 71 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0765 72 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0765

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 354: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-46

Table 3.22: Materials and Processes D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.6367 2 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.4538 3 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.4391 4 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.4278 5 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.3400 6 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.3070 7 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.2732 8 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2510 9 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.2256 10 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.2151 11 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1971 12 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1941 13 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1871 14 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1783 15 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.1518 16 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.1200 17 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.1200 18 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.1200 19 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.1200 20 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.1200 21 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1200 22 12189 USA WATERVLIET ARSENAL 0.1200 23 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1200 24 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.1200 25 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.1083 26 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1035 27 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0821 28 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0757 29 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0506 30 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0472 31 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0430 32 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.0337 33 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0292 34 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0271 35 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.0258 36 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.0258 37 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0228 38 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0227 39 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0168 40 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0150 41 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0150 42 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0150 43 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0150

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 355: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-47

Table 3.23: Materials and Processes Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.8508 2 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.5591 3 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2895 4 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.2777 5 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.2774 6 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.2763 7 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2479 8 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.2373 9 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2361 10 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.2182 11 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.2085 12 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.2059 13 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.1966 14 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.1709 15 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.1630 16 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1453 17 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1383 18 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1367 19 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1238 20 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1236 21 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.0799 22 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0790 23 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0758 24 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0757 25 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0738 26 19111 USN USN-2-Philadelphia 0.0733 27 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.0733 28 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0710 29 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.0700 30 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.0700 31 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.0700 32 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.0700 33 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.0700 34 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.0700 35 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.0700 36 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.0700 37 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0520 38 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0308 39 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0189 40 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0189 41 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0085 42 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0052 43 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.0040 44 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0040 45 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0040 46 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0040 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 356: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-48

Table 3.24: Materials and Processes T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.4673 2 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.4243 3 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.3961 4 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.3604 5 28310 USA FORT BRAGG 0.3427 6 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.3248 7 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.3176 8 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.2862 9 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.2462 10 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2233 11 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.2161 12 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.2160 13 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.1422 14 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1376 15 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.1350 16 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1350 17 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.1350 18 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.1350 19 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.1350 20 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.1350 21 01760 USN NAVCLOTEXTRSCHFAC_NATICK_MA 0.1350 22 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.1350 23 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.1350 24 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1350 25 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.1350 26 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.1350 27 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.1350 28 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1188 29 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0949 30 20903 USAF Tunnel 9 White Oak 0.0791 31 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0640 32 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0541 33 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0507 34 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0450 35 01760 USA SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER 0.0367 36 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0360 37 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0347 38 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.0342 39 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0335 40 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0319 41 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0271 42 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0270 43 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0270 44 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0270

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 357: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-49

Table 3.25: Nuclear Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20393 USN DIRSSP_WASHINGTON_DC 0.4670 2 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.4107 3 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3152 4 84044 USN NAVPMOSSP_DET_MAGNA_UT 0.2347 5 01201 USN NAVPMOSSP_PITTSFIELD_MA 0.2332 6 94039 USN NAVPMOSSP_SUNNYVALE_CA Sunnyvale 0.1912 7 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1433 8 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1256 9 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1237 10 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1135 11 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0988 12 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0905 13 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0863 14 32920 USN NAVORDTESTU_CAPE_CANAVERAL_FL 0.0776 15 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0650 16 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0643 17 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0635 18 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0635 19 88002 USN WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0635 20 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0635 21 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.0635 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 358: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-50

Table 3.26: Nuclear Technology Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.7099 2 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.4239 3 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.2562 4 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1335 5 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.1316 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.0930 7 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.0799 8 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0787 9 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0554 10 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.0459 11 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0375 12 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0375 13 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0375 14 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0375 15 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0375 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 359: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-51

Table 3.27: Nuclear Technology T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 32920 USN NAVORDTESTU_CAPE_CANAVERAL_FL 0.4046 2 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.3544 3 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.2353 4 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.2022 5 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1997 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1707 7 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1050 8 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1050 9 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1050 10 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.1044 11 20903 USAF Tunnel 9 White Oak 0.1043 12 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0775 13 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0769 14 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0764 15 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0764 16 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0764 17 94039 USN NAVPMOSSP_SUNNYVALE_CA Sunnyvale 0.0706 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 360: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-52

Table 3.28: Sea Vehicles D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.5257 2 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.4983 3 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.4930 4 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2989 5 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.2969 6 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2847 7 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.2324 8 83803 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.1795 9 98314 USN USN_2_Bremerton 0.1755 10 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1743 11 33004 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.1666 12 38113 USN NSWC CARDEROCK DIV DET MEMPHIS TN 0.1660 13 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1557 14 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1405 15 23521 USN USN_2_Norfolk 0.1392 16 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.1383 17 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1300 18 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.1200 19 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.1200 20 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.1200 21 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1200 22 48397 USA DETROIT ARSENAL 0.1029 23 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0967 24 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0957 25 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0928 26 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0820 27 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0783 28 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0735 29 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0585 30 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.0585 31 23460 USN USN_2_VABEACH. 0.0578 32 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0577 33 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0575

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 361: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-53

Table 3.29: Sea Vehicles Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.6893 2 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.3723 3 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3688 4 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.3676 5 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.2719 6 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2300 7 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.2114 8 83803 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.1627 9 38113 USN NSWC CARDEROCK DIV DET MEMPHIS TN 0.1614 10 33004 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.1537 11 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1447 12 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1426 13 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.1214 14 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1167 15 98314 USN USN_2_Bremerton 0.1144 16 23521 USN USN_2_Norfolk 0.1057 17 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1043 18 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.0746 19 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0700 20 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0700 21 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0700 22 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0700 23 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0665 24 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0662 25 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0636 26 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0630 27 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0445 28 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.0367 29 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0366 30 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0364 31 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0364 32 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0360 33 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0352 34 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.0350 35 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0350 36 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0350

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 362: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-54

Table 3.30: Sea Vehicles T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.4177 2 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.4075 3 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.3141 4 19112 USN NAVSURFWARCENSHIPSYSENGSTA_PHILADELPHIA_P 0.2853 5 20817 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.2437 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1401 7 83803 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.1049 8 98314 USN USN_2_Bremerton 0.0976 9 33004 USN NAVSURFWARCEN_CARDEROCKDIV_BETHESDA_MD 0.0928 10 38113 USN NSWC CARDEROCK DIV DET MEMPHIS TN 0.0871 11 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0754 12 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.0702 13 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0619 14 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0607 15 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0601 16 23521 USN USN_2_Norfolk 0.0589 17 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0536 18 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0525 19 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0525 20 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0525 21 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0490 22 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0478 23 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0376 24 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0376 25 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0357 26 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.0342 27 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0334 28 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0331 29 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.0286 30 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0251 31 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0250 32 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0250 33 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0250

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 363: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-55

Table 3.31: Sensors, Electronics, and EW D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.6175 2 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.4834 3 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.4744 4 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.4337 5 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.3965 6 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.3885 7 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.3811 8 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.3632 9 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.3495 10 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.3402 11 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.3267 12 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.3001 13 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.2944 14 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.2680 15 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.2603 16 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.2524 17 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.2520 18 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.2510 19 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.2323 20 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.2287 21 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.2250 22 31088 USA Warner Robbins AFB 0.2247 23 90001 USA FORT MONMOUTH Los Angeles 0.2247 24 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.2055 25 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.2016 26 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.1944 27 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1878 28 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1831 29 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1829 30 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.1799 31 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.1781 32 92135 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1744 33 23460 USN USN_2_VABEACH. 0.1661 34 98278 USN USN_3_Oak Harbor 0.1654 35 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1647 36 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.1641 37 92145 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.1638 38 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1604

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 364: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-56

Table 3.31: Sensors, Electronics, and EW D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1583 40 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1582 41 08733 USA CERDEC Flight Activity 0.1307 42 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1300 43 30905 USA FT GORDON 0.1299 44 20755 USA Army Cryptological Ops Field Ofc 0.1299 45 20186 USA FORT MONMOUTH RF Analysis SPO 0.1297 46 32902 USA FORT MONMOUTH Melbourne 0.1296 47 85615 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1296 48 20762 USN DET NATEC WASHINGTON 0.1294 49 76217 USN NATEC_SAN_DIEGO_CA FORT WORTH 0.1294 50 93246 USN USN_2_Lemoore 0.1294 51 70143 USN DET NATEC NEW ORLEANS 0.1294 52 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1294 53 66027 USA FT LEAVENWORTH 0.1294 54 33205 USN DET NATEC CHERRY POINT 0.1294 55 19090 USN DET NATEC WILLOW GROVE 0.1294 56 04011 USN DET NATEC BRUNSWICK 0.1294 57 29904 USN DET NATEC BEAUFORT 0.1294 58 22331 USA CECOM Acquisition Center- Washington 0.1294 59 28545 USN USN_2_Camp Lejeune 0.1294 60 96863 USN NATEC_SAN_DIEGO_CA KANEOHE BAY 0.1294 61 12550 USN DET NATEC STEWART ANGB NY 0.1294 62 32228 USN USN-2_Mayport 0.1294 63 30060 USN DET NATEC ATLANTA 0.1294 64 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1283 65 01201 USN NAVPMOSSP_PITTSFIELD_MA 0.1200 66 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.1200 67 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.1200 68 98433 USA Fort Lewis 0.1200 69 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.1200 70 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.1200 71 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.1200 72 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.1200 73 92110 USA FORT MONMOUTH San Diego 0.1200 74 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1200 75 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.1126 76 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1036

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 365: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-57

Table 3.31: Sensors, Electronics, and EW D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 77 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.1026 78 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.1020 79 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.1020 80 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.1000 81 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.0960 82 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0879 83 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0878 84 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0860 85 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0854 86 80901 USAF Hanscom AFB Colorado Springs 0.0786 87 80914 USAF Peterson AFB 0.0780 88 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0777 89 08057 USN AEGIS_TECHREP_MOORESTOWN_NJ 0.0760 90 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0735 91 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0734 92 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0726 93 78243 USAF Lackland AFB 0.0724 94 39534 USAF USAF_2_Biloxi 0.0723 95 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0723 96 33621 USA CERDEC Tampa Field Ofc 0.0722 97 20001 USAF USAF_5_DC 0.0721 98 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0721 99 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0720 100 62225 USAF SCOTT AFB 0.0720 101 68113 USAF USAF_2_Omaha 0.0720 102 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0720 103 85706 USAF Tucson IAP AGS 0.0720

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 366: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-58

Table 3.32: Sensors, Electronics, and EW Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.8255 2 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.5405 3 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.5018 4 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.4809 5 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.3972 6 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.3660 7 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.3594 8 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.3561 9 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.3392 10 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.3152 11 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.3007 12 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.2811 13 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2750 14 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.2611 15 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.2589 16 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.2578 17 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.2440 18 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.2378 19 13441 USAF Rome Laboratory 0.2345 20 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.2204 21 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.2155 22 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.1989 23 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.1987 24 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1783 25 20392 USN NAVOBSY_WASHINGTON_DC 0.1756 26 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1750 27 86002 USN NAVOBSY_WASHINGTON_DC Flagstaff 0.1551 28 85615 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.1517 29 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1517 30 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.1509 31 08733 USA CERDEC Flight Activity 0.1509 32 22331 USA CECOM Acquisition Center- Washington 0.1509 33 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1509 34 22210 USA ARO Arlington 0.1509 35 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.1079 36 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.0953 37 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0867 38 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.0833

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 367: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-59

Table 3.32: Sensors, Electronics, and EW Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0833 40 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0833 41 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0833 42 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0833 43 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0816 44 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.0783 45 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.0700 46 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0700 47 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0700 48 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.0700 49 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0700 50 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0660 51 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0626 52 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0543 53 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0533 54 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0533 55 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.0430 56 36615 USN NRL_WASHINGTON_DC Mobile 0.0426 57 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0426 58 06357 USN NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET Niantic 0.0424 59 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0422 60 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0421 61 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0420 62 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0420 63 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0420 64 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0420 65 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0420 66 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.0420 67 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0420 68 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0420

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 368: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-60

Table 3.33: Sensors, Electronics, and EW T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.7402 2 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.5610 3 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.5356 4 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.4644 5 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.4009 6 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.3768 7 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.3608 8 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.3355 9 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.3103 10 73503 USA FT SILL 0.2905 11 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.2865 12 08057 USN AEGIS_TECHREP_MOORESTOWN_NJ 0.2774 13 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.2722 14 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.2643 15 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.2630 16 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.2559 17 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.2198 18 92055 USN MCB Camp Pendleton (DRPMAAA) 0.2129 19 29419 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC 0.1960 20 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1944 21 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.1846 22 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1800 23 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.1758 24 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1390 25 23464 USN SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston – Little Creek 0.1382 26 85706 USAF Tucson IAP AGS 0.1358 27 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.1338 28 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1276 29 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.1275 30 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1222 31 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.1126 32 32544 USAF HURLBURT FIELD AAF 0.1114 33 32826 USA USA_3_Orlando 0.1096 34 79916 USA FT BLISS 0.1088 35 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.1084 36 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.1079 37 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.1078 38 06357 USN NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET Niantic 0.1077

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 369: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-61

Table 3.33: Sensors, Electronics, and EW T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.1075 40 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1074 41 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0975 42 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0975 43 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.0975 44 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.0975 45 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.0975 46 08733 USN NAVAIRWARCENACDIV Lakehurst 0.0975 47 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0867 48 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0804 49 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0748 50 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.0735 51 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0732 52 93550 USAF USAF_2_Palmdale (AF PLANT 41) 0.0698 53 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0694 54 20360 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Washington 0.0663 55 32508 USN USN_3_Penasacola 0.0644 56 23501 USN USN_3_Norfold/Protsmouth 0.0644 57 20653 USN SPAWARSYSCEN_CHARLESTON_SC Lexington Park 0.0644 58 32212 USN USN_3_Jacksonville 0.0644 59 96782 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA PEARL HARBOR 0.0641 60 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0639 61 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0624 62 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.0608 63 35824 USAF Kirtland AFB Huntsville 0.0602 64 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.0601 65 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0593 66 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0592 67 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0589 68 89191 USAF NELLIS AFB 0.0587 69 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0585 70 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0585 71 35898 MDA REDSTONE ARSENAL MDA 0.0585 72 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0585

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 370: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-62

Table 3.34: Space Platforms D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.8406 2 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2753 3 80914 USAF Peterson AFB 0.2051 4 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1490 5 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.1473 6 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.1396 7 94089 USAF Onizuka AFS Sunnyvale 0.1324 8 07703 USA FORT MONMOUTH 0.1200 9 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1099 10 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.1078 11 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1009 12 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0848 13 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0841 14 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0840 15 93437 USAF Vandenberg AFB 0.0834 16 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.0818 17 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0813 18 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.0783 19 20151 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA 0.0751 20 78243 USAF Lackland AFB 0.0710 21 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.0708 22 80912 MDA MDA - Colorado 0.0591 23 00000 USN SSFA SPAFLDACT DET 0.0581 24 22046 USN SSFA GBS SUPPORT OFFICE 0.0581 25 90261 USN SSFA_CHANTILLY_VA LOS ANGELES 0.0580 26 22201 USAF USAF_3_Arlington 0.0579 27 39534 USAF USAF_2_Biloxi 0.0578 28 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0578 29 80011 USAF Buckley AFB 0.0577 30 80301 USAF Los Angeles AFB BOULDER 0.0576 32 78148 USAF Randolph AFB 0.0575 33 90245 USN SPAWARSYSCOM_SAN_DIEGO_CA EL SEGUNDO 0.0575 34 20001 USAF USAF_5_DC 0.0575 35 35801 USAF SMC OL:AH, HUNTSVILLE CITY 0.0575 36 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0575 37 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0575 38 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0575 39 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0575 40 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0575 41 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0575

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 371: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-63

Table 3.35: Space Platforms Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.5710 2 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.5191 3 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.5164 4 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.5011 5 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.2748 6 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.1702 7 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1590 8 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1497 9 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.1366 10 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1241 11 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.1166 12 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.1120 13 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0746 14 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0746 15 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0630 16 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0506 17 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0501 18 80914 USAF Peterson AFB 0.0495 19 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.0490 20 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0379 21 20001 USAF USAF_5_DC 0.0353 22 23651 USAF Langley AFB 0.0351 23 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0350 25 85212 USAF USAF_2_Mesa (AFRL MESA) 0.0350 26 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0350 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 372: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-64

Table 3.36: Space Platforms T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.4008 2 37388 USAF Arnold AFS 0.3717 3 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.3408 4 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.3090 5 80914 USAF Peterson AFB 0.2312 6 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.2161 7 93437 USAF Vandenberg AFB 0.1986 8 20903 USAF Tunnel 9 White Oak 0.1458 9 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.1345 10 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1087 11 80011 USAF Buckley AFB 0.0965 12 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0964 13 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0834 14 35824 USAF Kirtland AFB Huntsville 0.0817 15 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.0789 16 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.0785 17 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0689 18 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0677 19 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0665 20 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.0585 21 20001 USAF USAF_5_DC 0.0501 22 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0501 23 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.0501 24 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0501 25 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0501 26 32925 USAF USAF_3_Cocoa Beach 0.0501 27 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0501

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 373: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-65

Table 3.37: Weapons Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.6155 2 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.5251 3 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.4982 4 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.4669 5 20301 MDA MDA - NCR 0.3725 6 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.3660 7 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.3110 8 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.3103 9 35898 MDA REDSTONE ARSENAL MDA 0.2874 10 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.2782 11 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.2729 12 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.2309 13 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.2292 14 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.2252 15 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.2223 16 80912 MDA MDA - Colorado 0.2155 17 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.2134 18 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.2085 19 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.1865 20 35807 MDA MDA - Alabama 0.1834 21 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.1824 22 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.1742 23 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1692 24 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.1673 25 99737 MDA MDA - Alaska 0.1650 26 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.1550 27 93437 MDA MDA - California 0.1470 28 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.1451 29 90740 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_INDIAN_HEAD_MD Seal Beach 0.1424 30 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1400 31 12189 USA WATERVLIET ARSENAL 0.1386 32 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.1368 33 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.1303 34 07722 USN Colts Neck 0.1295 35 23691 USN USN_3_Yorktown (WPNSTA_Yorktown) 0.1289 36 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.1283 37 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.1264 38 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.1239

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 374: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-66

Table 3.37: Weapons Technology D&A

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 73145 USAF Tinker AFB 0.1211 40 88002 USN WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1190 41 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.1185 42 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.1085 43 87117 MDA MDA at Kirtland AFB 0.1055 44 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.1052 45 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.1031 46 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.1012 47 92028 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN Fallbrook 0.0972 48 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0960 49 22060 USA FORT BELVOIR 0.0951 50 32542 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Eglin 0.0905 51 35898 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD 0.0905 52 92135 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0903 53 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0902 54 85369 USN YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.0902 55 23511 USN USN_7_Norfolk 0.0902 56 20374 USN USN_2_WNY 0.0902 57 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0900 58 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.0858 59 22202 USN USN_3_Arlington 0.0829 60 01731 USAF Hanscom AFB 0.0825 61 21010 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0778 62 23801 USA Fort Lee 0.0768 63 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0700 64 20393 USN DIRSSP_WASHINGTON_DC 0.0668 65 22205 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Arlington 0.0642 66 74501 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_INDIAN_HEAD_MD McAlester 0.0642 67 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0642 68 01201 USN NAVPMOSSP_PITTSFIELD_MA 0.0640 69 20301 USA USA_3_Arlington 0.0638 70 80914 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL Colorado Springs 0.0636 71 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0636 72 92110 USN USN_2_San Diego 0.0636 73 20640 USA RDECOM-ARDEC, EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL 0.0636 74 20646 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER LAPLATA 0.0636 75 23460 USN USN_2_VABEACH. 0.0636 76 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0635 77 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0635 78 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0635

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 375: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-67

Table 3.38: Weapons Technology Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.5371 2 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.5272 3 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.5062 4 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.4609 5 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.4448 6 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.3336 7 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.3094 8 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.2851 9 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.2834 10 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.2724 11 20375 USN Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 0.2487 12 22060 DTRA National Capital Element DTRA 0.2037 13 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.2031 14 22203 DARPA DARPA 0.1963 15 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1826 16 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.1770 17 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.1754 18 96753 USAF Kirtland AFB Kihei 0.1610 19 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.1598 20 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.1558 21 20732 USN NRL Chesapeake Bay Detachment 0.1462 22 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.1433 23 27709 USA ARO Durham NC 0.1401 24 93943 USN NAVPGSCOL_MONTEREY_CA 0.1399 25 23691 USN USN_3_Yorktown (WPNSTA_Yorktown) 0.1245 26 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.1156 27 88002 USN WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.1141 28 22130 USN Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 0.1130 29 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.1125 30 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.1077 31 22210 USAF AFOSR 0.1016 32 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0945 33 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.0938 34 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0814 35 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.0812 36 23604 USA FORT EUSTIS 0.0776 37 73503 USA FT SILL 0.0769 38 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0768

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 376: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-68

Table 3.38: Weapons Technology Research

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 30303 USN CNR_ARLINGTON_VA ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE 0.0731 40 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0592 41 07722 USN Colts Neck 0.0580 42 21010 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.0573 43 40121 USA FORT KNOX 0.0572 44 78235 USAF BROOKS CITY-BASE 0.0483 45 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.0445 46 92028 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN Fallbrook 0.0445 47 20301 MDA MDA - NCR 0.0435 48 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0407 49 39529 USN NRL Detachment Stennis Space Ctr 0.0404 50 12189 USA WATERVLIET ARSENAL 0.0385 51 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0376 52 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0376 53 33621 USAFoth SOCOM 0.0376 54 31905 USA FT BENNING 0.0375 55 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0375 56 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0375 57 90740 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_INDIAN_HEAD_MD Seal Beach 0.0375 58 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0375 59 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0375 60 20910 USA WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER 0.0000 Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 377: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-69

Table 3.39: Weapons Technology T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 1 88002 USA WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.7301 2 32548 USAF Eglin AFB 0.6836 3 93555 USN USN_2_China Lake(NAVAIRWPNSTA China Lake) 0.6391 4 93042 USN USN_2_PT MUGU (NAVBASE VENTURA CTY PT MUGU) 0.6238 5 21005 USA ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 0.5511 6 98345 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Keyport 0.5197 7 84403 USAF Hill AFB 0.5123 8 84022 USA DUGWAY PROVING GROUND 0.5052 9 85365 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND 0.4848 10 35898 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL 0.4799 11 32407 USN USN_2_Pannama City 0.4302 12 22448 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_DAHLGREN_VA 0.4055 13 73503 USA FT SILL 0.3704 14 79916 USA FT BLISS 0.3479 15 36362 USA FORT RUCKER 0.3053 16 20670 USN USN_8_Pax (NAS Patuxent River) 0.1074 17 47522 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN 0.0930 18 93524 USAF EDWARDS AFB 0.0804 19 92878 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CORONA_CA 0.0802 20 20640 USN USN_3_Indian Head (IF NAVSURFWARCENDIV Indian 0.0787 21 23461 USN USN_3_VABEACH 0.0718 22 02841 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0717 23 88310 USAF USAF_2_Alamogorgo (Holloman) 0.0671 24 89191 USAF NELLIS AFB 0.0645 25 96792 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA Waianae 0.0629 26 93043 USN USN_3_Port Hueneme (NAVSURFWARCENDIV PORT 0.0622 27 87117 USAF Kirtland AFB 0.0615 28 88002 USN WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 0.0609 29 92152 USN USN_4_San Diego (NAVSTA_SAN_DIEGO) 0.0595 30 92028 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_CRANE_IN Fallbrook 0.0582 31 90740 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_INDIAN_HEAD_MD Seal Beach 0.0564 32 07806 USA PICATINNY ARSENAL 0.0564 33 96752 USN PACMISRANFAC_HAWAREA_BARKING_SANDS_HI 0.0532 34 23337 USN SURFCOMBATSYSCEN_WALLOPS_ISLAND_VA 0.0531 35 99737 USA USA_2_Ft Greeley 0.0515 36 76542 USA FT HOOD 0.0510 37 32544 USAF HURLBURT FIELD AAF 0.0508 38 92123 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_KEYPORT_WA San Diego 0.0507

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Page 378: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NALYSIS AND … · 2021. 5. 18. · DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY—BRAC 2005—ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 7.2 Military Value Assessment Military Value analysis,

B-70

Table 3.39: Weapons Technology T&E

Rank Facility Code Facility Name MilVal 39 80914 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL Colorado Springs 0.0505 40 22134 USN MCB Quantico 0.0477 41 85613 USA FORT HUACHUCA 0.0458 42 20376 USN USN_3_WNY (COMNAV DISTRICT Washington D.C.) 0.0448 43 32403 USAF Tyndall AFB 0.0438 44 23691 USN USN_3_Yorktown (WPNSTA_Yorktown) 0.0436 45 89023 DTRA DTRA Nevada 0.0400 46 33040 USN USN_3_Key West 0.0393 47 22217 USN OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH 0.0392 48 61299 USA ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL 0.0382 49 23505 USN COMOPTEVFOR_NORFOLK_VA 0.0362 50 07722 USN Colts Neck 0.0359 51 87117 DTRA Kirtland AFB 0.0356 52 22202 USA USA_4_Arlington 0.0343 53 37389 USN Arnold AFS USN 0.0339 54 80912 MDA MDA - Colorado 0.0332 55 35898 MDA REDSTONE ARSENAL MDA 0.0315 56 40214 USN NAVSURFWARCENDIV_PORT_HUENEME_CA Louisville 0.0306 57 20783 USA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER 0.0299 58 22302 USA USA_3_Alexandria 0.0296 59 99505 USA REDSTONE ARSENAL ANCHORAGE 0.0290 60 93550 USAF USAF_2_Palmdale (AF PLANT 41) 0.0290 61 02840 USN COMNAVUNSEAWARCEN_NEWPORT_RI 0.0288 62 45433 USAF Wright-Patterson AFB 0.0287 63 20670 USAF USAF_4_Pax 0.0287 64 89070 USAF Eglin AFB Indian Springs 0.0287 65 99703 USA YUMA PROVING GROUND Ft. Wainwright 0.0287 66 90245 USAF Los Angeles AFB 0.0287 67 22205 USN COMNAVAIRSYSCOM_PATUXENT_RIVER_MD Arlington 0.0287 68 33416 USN NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV_NEWPORT_RI West Palm Beach 0.0287 69 85706 USAF Tucson IAP AGS 0.0287 70 31098 USAF Warner Robbins AFB 0.0287

Thursday, April 21, 2005