Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 1Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Design and Construction of
Biocontainment Laboratories
Page 12009 © Group-IPS
Effective management of a biocontainment facility
design and construction project
Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 2Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Aim of the presentation
• Giving a better insight in the different steps of an
investment project
• Giving a better insight in the different people involved
in a project
• Proving the importance of biosafety risk analysis
• Identifying the critical steps for biosafety
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 3Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction
• The logic of a biocontainment facility project
is not different then any other investment
project!
• However…
– Biosafety constraints can give very
important technical and spatial impacts
– Those impacts can change a strategic
position of a project
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 4Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, impact of biosafety constraints
• Construction costs increases exponential with the required biosafety
level
• Construction Time (incl. Qualification) increases exponential with
the required biosafety level.
• Required surface increases exponential with the required biosafety
level
• Operational costs (and processing time) increase also exponential
with the required biosafety level (BSL3 facilities have generally the
highest operational cost in the industry)
No Bio Safety Level Bio Safety level 3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
BSL1
BSL2
BSL2+
BSL3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
BSL1
BSL2
BSL2+
BSL3
Construction Cost (%)
Operational Cost (%)
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 5Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, master impacts
• Biosaferty can be mastered by a profound
risks analysis, identifying the real (biosafety)
risks for the concerned activities, not only
applying procedures!
• Identified risks can be controlled by
– technical means and design of the facility (CAPEX)
– operation procedures and work practices (OPEX)
– PPE and adapted equipment (CAPEX/OPEX)
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 6Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
• The later a change is introduced in a project, the more impact
it has on timing and investment costs.
Introduction, impact of time on change
BASIC DESIGN
DETAILED DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
USER REQUIREMENTS
FEASABILITY
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 7Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, managing project = managing risk
• Conclusion
– Risks have to identified as precise as
possible to identify the most appropriate
solution
– The notion of biosafety and the related
consequences have to be introduced in a
project as from the early beginning
– To avoid change during the project every
step has to be validated on biosafety level
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 8Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, Project Life Cycle
PROJECT
REALISATION
PROJECT
PREPARATION
IDENTIFY THE NEEDGroup’s Strategy
Logistics and Market
Project Evaluation
Investment
AnalysisPermitting Procurement
Process Definition
Layout
Basic Design
Budget / Fin. Model
Operational Model
Feasibility
Profitability
Topography
Local customs
Architecture
Environment
Permit Requests
Local negotiations
Basic Specifications
Purchase Strategy
Integrated Inquiry
Negotiations
Contractual-
Agreements
Decision to
Invest
Building Permit
Environm. Permit
Contracts
Purchase Orders
Need defined
Project Management
Project Administration
Cost Control
Quality Management
Quantity Management
Layout
Time Schedule
Integrated Engineering
Site & Safety Management
CE Label, Validation
Financing
Structured
Financing
Due Diligence
Technology
Market
Finance
Management
Recruitment
Training
Interim Plant
Management
Operational
Project Needs
Process Description*
Project Preparation
Basic design
Permitting
Procurement
Project Realisation
Construction
Qualification
Operation
*User requirements
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 9Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, different players
• Steering Pole (overall strategy of the company)
– Strategic level of the company
• USER Pole (defines the need)
– Physically will use the facility (or has the
knowledge of the activity) and therefore defines the
needs.
• Design & Construction Pole (realises the project)
– Translates a need in a virtual facility (design)
– Translates the virtual facility in a built facility
– Check if the built facility is compliant
• Compliances Pole (overall policy of the company and
legal requirements)
– Will control the facility and therefore defines the
context in which the needs have to be translated to
a built facility
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 10Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
• Steering Pole
– Operational Manager
– Management User
– Management D&C Pole
– Shareholder‟s representative
• USER Pole (user representative)
– Actual and future operators of the facility
– Actual and future maintenance of the facility
• Design & Construction Pole (project manager)
– Design office (internal/external)
– Contractors
– Qualification team
• Compliances Pole (consultance)
– Environment Health & Safety, Bio Safety Officer ,
Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Validation
Team…
Introduction, Project Team
PROJECT TEAM
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 11Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Introduction, Time Schedule
Basic design (50% USER, 50% D&C)
Feasibility study (20% USER, 80% D&C)
Construction (10% USER, 90% D&C)
Detailed design (20% USER, 80% D&C)
Qualification (50% USER, 50% D&C)
Users requirements (80% USER, 20% D&C)
• Overall time frame (18 to more than 36 months)
Hand-Over (90% USER, 10% D&C)
D&C – Design and Construction
In this stage of the project the concepts are defined
Change after this phase of the project has a mayor
Impact on costs and timing !
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 12Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Needs , << Users Requirements >>
• Objective and Justification of the Project
• Compliances of the Project
– Quality (e.g. GMP, GLP…)
– Safety (incl. Biosafety)
– Energy
• General description of the activity and process
– Organisation chart
– Schematic Product/Sample flow diagrams
• Detailed description of each step of activity
– Definition of BSL zones on the flow diagrams
• Technical requirements
– Fluids, Environmental parameters…
– Redundancies
• Assessment of the evolution of the needs
– Flexibility
– Expansion possibilities
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 13Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Needs, avoid copy paste
• Note : People tend to define a need based upon what
they know or have today and not on what they really
need TOMORROW.
– Force people to project themselves into the future,
by means of benchmark visits, workshops,
simulations…
– Do not accept non motivated answers (e.g. “I need
the same lab as today + 50%”)
– Make assumptions on change (new technologies,
new markets, change of legislation…)
• Note : The more flexibility the higher the cost and the
longer the planning
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 14Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Needs, reorganization, standardization
• Note : Very often a project goes together with a
reorganisation, this reorganisation should be
conceived before or in parallel with the project, NOT
afterwards!
• Note : In larger projects it happens very often that the
user that defines the project is not the one that will use
the facility
– A certain degree of standardisation is needed as
the users that define the project are often not the
once that use the facility
– Strategic decisions should be motivated in written
form (paper statements, risk analysis, GAP
analysis…)
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 15Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Needs, Difficulties of Communication
• Techniques have impact on use and use has impact on
techniques, but….
– USER Pole
• incubation, clinical studies phase 1, cross
contamination…
• useful m2, quality, image, FTE….
– D&C Pole
• N/m2, dimensioning pressure, P&ID, nD, l/min,
safety valves, AHU
• euros, working days, brute m2 ….
• Find a common language and interest !
– Linear meter of working bench, Room Data
Sheets…
– Find a good balance in-between investment and
operations
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 16Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Needs , Functioning diagrams
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 17Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation , << Basic Design >>
• General Layout
– BSL zones
– Pressures
– People flow (maintenance, operators, visitors…)
– Material flow (sample/product, waste, disposals…)
• Room by Room (preliminary RDS)
– Equipment positioning
– Compliances and quality levels
• Technical concepts
– Flow Charts and preliminary P&ID
– Functional descriptions
• Validation Master Plan (preliminary) !
– Risk assessment
– Elements to validate
P&ID – Piping and Instrument
Diagram
RDS – Room Data Sheet
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 18Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, Lay-out strategy
• Independent BSL3 unit
– Containment limited to the unit itself;
support rooms not contained
• BSL3 suite
– Unit and support rooms gathered into one
organised containment area
• Integrated BSL3 unit (“box in a box” concept)
– BSL3 units integrated in an organised suite
of a lower Bio Safety level (BSL2 or BSL2+)
“BSL2+” - non-official biological
containment level that has
been created by a number of
institutions to manage the
large gap between BSL2 and
BSL3 requirements, it has
been locally recognized
by some authorities.
BSL3 suite Integrated BSL3 unitIndependent BSL3 unit
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 19Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, Lab Organisation - Example
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 20Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, P&ID - Example
P&ID – Piping and Instrument
Diagram
= „bible‟ between the project team and the maintenance
and user !
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 21Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, People and Material Flow
Material to be autoclaved
Material to be autoclaved
(recyclable)
Material in
Biological Sample
Staff logistic non confined
Staff Waste evacuation
Staff logistics confined
Staff Lab
Visitors
Waste
Waste to decontaminate
• A good circulation plan (people and material) helps
you to identify the risks.
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 22Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, Permitting
• Present in time to the authorities
– Discuss needs (informal) with authorities
– Present basic design to the authoraties
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 23Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Preparation, Procurement
Generic Specialized
Low
High
Bio
Safe
ty Involv
em
ent
Civil
Works
HVACFinishing
Decontamination
Equipment
FurnitureProcess
Piping
Black Piping
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 24Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Project Realization
• Besides the construction phase, two extra
phases are added :
– Validation/Qualification
– Transfer of activities
• Installation of equipment can be a
problem, ask help from specialist
movers
• Risk analysis for moving activities
(changed parameters)
– Training of staff
• Those phases should be planned and
anticipated as from the basic design!
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 28Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Conclusions, Input BSO
• The BSO identifies the RISKS, communicates them and
assures that they are mastered.
• The BSO GIVES ADVICE and CONTROLS at ALL
stages of the project (main input during user
requirements and basic design)
• The BSO APPROUVES
– the User Requirements
– Basic Design (incl. the VMP)
– Critical parts in the Detailed Design and
Construction
– Specific validation protocols
BSO – BioSafety Officer
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 29Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Conclusions , How to Impose Bio Safety in a Project
• Every pole has its own interests, Bio Safety is only one
of the needed compliances…
• Argumentation
– Inform the team on the legal context
– Make and explain risk assessments
– Make the project team be accomplice to Bio Safety
– Leave flexibility to the project team (User and D&C)
to allow as well technical and operational solutions
• To avoid
– Impose technical solutions without understanding
or argumentation
1) Introduction
2) Project Needs
3) Project Preparation
4) Project Realization
5) Conclusions
Page 30Belgian Biosafety Symposium on 3 December 2009 2009 © Group-IPS
Speaker
Patrick DE GRAEVE, ir [email protected]
IPS Belgium sa
Industrial Projects Services
Porte de l'Europe
Av. Robert Schuman, 16
1400 Nivelles - Belgium
www.group-ips.com