Detailed Work Plan of SPEEDY3

8/13/2019 Detailed Work Plan of SPEEDY3

1/65

I Project identification

1.10. Project Summary

The project is structured in 7 WPs.WP1 and WP2 are transversal activities. The first one will guarantee the coordination of the projects' activities and the

second one will ensure the continuous exchange of information among beneficiaries and institutions operating in the

interested territories.

The 5 technical WPs will allow reaching the aim of the project through the shared construction of a methodology onenvironmental evaluation activities.

In the WP3 the analysis of local and national regulations of the different participants will allow the realization of

Comparative Dynamics Analysis in order to evaluate the state of the art and compare the currently procedures of SEA

(Strategic Environmental Assessment), better identifying gaps and critical issues about them that influence the

achievement of the EU objectives.

efinition of. . ...a methodfir identifying and discussing shared ITEMS' that. should be taken intoaccount. in the phase of web advanced platform SKP (Shared Knowledge Platform) development.

In WP5 SKP (Shared Knowledge Platform) will be realized: web platform will be an adlvanced-online tool, with differentaccessibility's levels, that allows working on docu-ments in an assisted revision and in streaming. So WP5 starts

Call for proposals

I I Project Title1.2. Project Acronym

1.3. Project Code

1.4. Date of approval

1.5. Priority / Measure

7.7. Project length

1.8. Total budget

1.9.Partnership

02/11/2011 23:26:16 2 ord./0226/0 Page 1 of 65

Second call for ordinary project proposals

Shared Project for Environmental Evaluation with Dynamic governanceSPEEDY

Z0ord 0226/0

N U ~ S~ - I /eqstarf~ n dTots months

P ~ ~ o n t yMeasure

name in English. Cotintry, levelof Nuts I1 or equivalent)

Abruzzo-

Pescara

09/2012081201 5

36

3 Accessibility and Networks

3.3 Communication networks

Region of Abruzzo-Directorate for Bureau Affairs, Legislative and ECPolicies, External Affairs, Energy

ITALY

2.535.000 OONumber of Benefioanes pet Country

ALBANIA 2

BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 0

CROATIA 1

GREECE 1

ITALY 5

MONTENEGRO 0Other [art. 97 reg (EC) 718120071 0

SERBIA 1

SLOVENIA 0Total Number of Benehoanes 10Total Number of Associates 2


2/65

simultaneously with WP4 in order to coordinate and validate the elaboration phase of the model with the im-plementationofthe web tool. , ,&.' f '

WP6 will fogsee the use of the platform (SKP) including the activation and manage-ment of working groups that will workon the preparation of documents that will be published online.

WP7's objective put forward a contribution in setting-up operative suggestions on processes providing some clearinformation on how face and solve some critical issues of the Environmental Assessment Procedure, in order to get to SEA

useful tool to reach the objectives set by EU legislation.

3 Project Description3 1 Project background and the problems and/or challenges to be addressed

The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive is an important step to forward in European environmental law,by requiring that the environmental effects of a broad range of plans and programmes have to be assessed. Whilst the

concept of strategic environmental assessment is relatively simple, the implementation of the Directive sets Member States

in a hard challenge. It goes to the heart of much public-sector decision-making. In many cases it requires more structured

planning and consultation procedures. There are difficult questions of interpretation, but when properly applied, these

assessments can help produce decisions that are more sustainable, now and for future generations. As described in the

report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and

the Committee of the Regions on the application and effectiveness of the Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessment

(Directive 2001142lEC) (COM(2009) 469 final) there is a need to develop capacity in the Member States so as to ensureeffective implementation of the SEA Directive. Ingierb,do-this,~htha apacity building must be strongly encouraged, inparticular through targeted campaigns for the recruitment and training of SEA experts and guidance documents in

particular on the interpretation of certain key concepts of the Directive (screening criteria, identification of alternatives,

coordination mechanisms and/orjoint procedures for fulfilling the requirements for assessment under other Directives,specific guidance on the link between SEA and EIA and Natura 2000 Assessment)..Overall, it can be concluded thatstrategic environmental assessment is a tool that is still evolving and changing. Ind.eedLc_urrent SEA practice is still limited

. . --with regaid q_mnth~dol~gi~al issues participatory approaches, quality control as well as general procedural andinstitutional deficits. The main technical and institutional problems of SEA are summarised as:

(?considerable differences in terms of the institutional and legal arrangements of the SEA procedure,@ift-icult

to integrate planning and programming procedures to SEA ones;LY;' '.'?mitations of information and training o.--

difficult in the coordination of the ioi& procedures for fulfilling the requirements gov-erning assessments under otherdirectives (EIA, Habitat and Birds, IPPC, Water Frame-work).

3. 2. Project Objectives (general and spec~ficSPFFDY to fa

. . . v g l b r m i o n a l c o o p e r a t i o n M P u b l i c a i m e d t o d A v e l n pand apply an efficient environmental assessment+processin the Adriatic space. This goal fits very well with the CandidateCountrieslPotential Candidate Countries' (CCICCPs) efforts to transpose the EU ,acquis in order to..apprgximate their.legjsla~tionand policies ~ j t h . E u r o p ~ a ntanda&..in .the eavironmental. topic, Synergic action be-tween the variousneighbouring countries is linked to the consideration that common envi-ronmental problems can only be solved tt-~~hr~u-gbcoord ina t i n~ rven t i on_sedge rather than 'acting on restricted territories. The increasing use ofelectronic corn-munication provides opportunities for reaching this goal in direct ways through the estab-lishment ofinternational forum. It will give all beneficiaries the opportunities to be engaged in lively debates in some of the more

popular fields on environmental impactassessment.In detail, the above objective will be achieved through the development of SEA web plat-form aimed to promote and extend

knowledge and share information about SEA. ? , c Thanks to this advanced web platform each beneficiary will be trained and- real time information on events,legislation and procedures, so it will be part of SEA critical issues management. SEA web platform will facilitate

transnational consultations on international plans and programmes according to SEA Directive, such as the New Adriatic

cross-border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020.

In details the project's specific objectives are the following:

0211 112011 23:26:16 2 0rd.1022610 Page 2 of 65


3/65

'araw up shared s-uggestiqnsuseful to modify and update European SEA Directive;Qcreate a useful tool able to allow Public European Institutions to contribute to the de-bate about SEA procedural

weaknesses;

ontroduce innovative participatory management approaches and tools improving in-stitutional capacity, strengtheningpublic involvement, and creating an effective rep-lication strategy;

a r e a t e a permanent Environmental Assessment Network;8develop approaches and practices for comprehensive and integrated impact assessment;a mp r o v e assessment procedures and methods for practical application;

9 i e w existing regulations, key components, and applications of Strategic Environ-mental Assessments (SEA);*'assess SEA requirements, including the authorizations, applications, initiatives, and relevant existing conditions of SEA;identify lessons learned and challenges in implementing SEA.

3.3.Qherence of the oroiect3 3 1 Coherence of the project with the Programme's strategy \,.

The proposed project shows a relevant coherence with the aims, both general and particular. identified in the IYA CBP.Regarding to programme priorities, the proposed activities are suitable to the PriorityJgeneral aim to "at strengtheniiig..and integrating existing infrastructure networks, promoting and developing tran=, i~~~rm;afi~n~-&~mnn. --services" through the creation of,SEA web advanced platform~spreadingthe informative material and the related studies._ __In particular, the project fits very well into the Measure 3.3. as it aims to create a tool for sharing experiences related to

governance p r o c a e s and proced~res~relatedto the institutional activities of the environma-S.J At strategic_ .. --

level, the project activities are in line with to IPA CB's purpose to aligner the Candidate Coun-triesIPotentialCandidateCouptries (CCICCPs) legislation with the acquis As defined by the programme, the processes of alignment withEuropean law in the field of environment are in delay. This situation is also confirmed by the COM(2011) 666 final onEnlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012 whose conclusion are "Full compliance with the acquis in the---field of the environment and climate change could be achieved only in the long term and would necessitate increased

levels of investmentn

.

3 3 2 Coherence o l t he project w ~ t hthe relevant EU pol~c iesand homontal IssuesThe project is consistent with the EU policies concerning ICT, Governance, Environment and-~&[email protected] to the Guidelines for Cohesion Policy 2007-13 the dissemina-tion of ICT across the EU contributes to improveinclusiveness and accessibility. Indeed, these objectives are desirable for reducing social inequality. In particularly,accessibility is crucial for sustainable development, as it improves well-being. These themes are integrated with those of

aovemance. The White Paper on Governance, adopted by the European Commission in July 2001, proposed a more

open policy making process in the European Union, to ensure wider participation of citizens and organizations. Among

the most recent documents, there is,Renewed Social Agenda (2008) that defines the e-inclusion and accessibility inEurope as a key objects desirable for reducing social inequality. The combination of these effects then generates a

virtuous cycle that leads to the improvement of European society. The project fits perfectly in these strategies, as it aims-to create a tool for sharing experiences r e la g and~ rpc .e~urrees s~e~atedto th e s t u t i ~ n a lactivities on e n v i w~ s s u n t n t ,y ~ c ~ ~ ~ - ~ p e c i f i c ~ o l i c i e ~ a b ~ u I ~ f h e U ~ & uAs underlined in many EU documents, there is a growing appreciation that there is a need to consider the environmental

and social implications of regional and sectoral development plans, a ~ dmacroeconomic and s e m Q k m s . StrategicEnvironment A s s e s s m e n t s ~ )is an analytical and participatory approach for mainstreaming and up streamingenvironmental and social issues into decision-making and implementation processes at the strategic level. SEC (2006)

621 on HALTING THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY BY 2010-AND BEYOND Sustaining ecosystem services for human

well-being considers to strengthen effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in informing decision-making so as to prevent, minimise and mitigate damages to Natura 2000 sites. In relation EU Enlargement policy, the

project activities fit very well with EU policy's goals and prospects to support CCICCPs'effortsto transpose the EU acquisin order to approximateiheir l eg i s@ o_~an~po~ ie~~w~ th ,E~pea~S~anda rdsin th a,r,ea-of environme-n;_,

3 3 3 Coherence of the project with pu lic nattonal and subnaOonai st ateg :csThe existence, expected at the level of the National Strategic Framework (NSF), programming tools that act at different

territorial level, not only regional and national but also interregional, calls for a stronger coordination capacity to ensure

02/11/2011 23:26:16 2 0rd JO226 0 Page 3 of 65


4/65

non-overlap interventions, their integration and, more generally, the ability of the system of government as a whole.

This need for integration and coordination require a significant effort in terms of overall gov-ernance of the system and

undoubtedly represent a major challenge in the current pro-gramming period, which will also continue to invest in

improving the ability to plan and im-plement interventions at different institutional levels. The proper setup and

management of development policies requires, therefore, that there is ability to link between different levels of

government and at the same time, public institutions that are able to relate to the territory and to collect, system and

make integrate knowledge at local level.

The success of these policies also requires a strengthening of the Public Administrations that has to be able to provide

efficient services for citizens and businesses in a system of clear and shared rules. The improvement of governance and

institutional capacity are addressed in the Priority 10 "Governance, institutional capacity and competitive and efficient

markets", which has as its overall objective is to: increase the governments' capacity in programming and management

of additional regional policy and strengthen the involvement of economic and social partnership. The specific objective,

which aims to enhance technical skills and government administrations, to improve the effectiveness of programming

and the quality of interventions in order to offer better services to citizens, responds directly to the need to address a

number of critical issues that continue to determine the efficiency and capacity of government for Public Administration.

The concept of efficiency of public administration cannot be distinguished from the aspects of legality and transparencymust be secured in its operation and the presence of knowledge and skills related to management issues and

implementation of regional policy-ordinary. Speedy project fits very well with these strategies: thanks to the creation of an

instrument for sharing experiences related to governance processes and institutional activities procedures related to theenvironmental assessment, it aims to strengthen the technical expertise and government administrations, it improve the

effectiveness of programming and the quality of interventions in order to offer better services to citizens.

3.4. Added value of the cross-border coooper tion n thisprojectThe power of the project stands in the common effort in tackling the environmental sustain-ability on the part of countries,

districts and regions, that so far have handled such difficult matter on their own, each of them in different ways.

The partnership is made up of 2 EU member States (Italy and Greece) andICandidate Country (Croatia) and 2 from

Potential Candidate (Albania and Serbia) and it represents very well the aim of IPA CBC Program.

Each partner will actively contribute to the realization of the activities and will join their forces together and elaborate

common strategies aimed to develop and apply an efficient envi-ronmental assessment process in the Adriatic space

aligning its legislation and policies with European standards.

The Italian Ministry, as Associate, M.A.T.T.M.-

Environmental Assessment Directorate (MATTM-DVA), will participate at

the project's activities in a transversal way. M.A.T.T.M. will mainly give its contribution in the dissemination of project's

results playing its role of national focal point for SEA.

The Serbian Ministry, as Associate, Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, will participate for developing

and for the implementation of efficient environmental assessment in Serbia, adopting EU legislation, policies and

standards in scope of environmental protection,sharingand solving common environmental problems in Adriatic countries,and promotion of environmental solutions and common efforts in Adriatic countries.

3.5.Methodology approach

Research and design process will progress through several steps, some of which will be carried out in parallel. WP1 andWP2 will be transversal activities carried out during all the proiect imo lgnent m with the aim of a good management .~andgood and efficient dissemination of project's results and activities.The other W c h n i c a l - s c i e n t i f i c purposes with the objective of deifying a web platform for aa the r ina linformation, best practices and operative mcedures already available, t u h a r e point of view on SEA issue.

G l l the above activities will be based on bottom-up approach.awl- . .The p r o j e m e o r e t i c a l work with t ed on t h m of Public

ns and Scientific Institutions. The cooperation will aim at:

ientific and institutional validation;

Technical and political guidance;

Consolidation of the institutional relationships between the Countries of the Adriatic area.

0211 11201 1 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page 4 of 65


5/65


6/65

far as regards the IPA programme and in particular on its measure (3.3) Speedy project wants to maximize the

indications and foreseen objectives.. ..>.d ~

3 9. Project management (>:^;The project will be managed by a cross border coordinating structure. In this contest a-Steer-ingCommittee (hereafter SC)will be set up in which each ----7eneficiarkwill-.-- be represented. The SC will have technical-operative tasks in order toimplement the project activities. The SC will absolve to the following tasks:

definition of the partnership general address

monitoring of the right development of project activities

to ensure and promote the active participation of all the partners to the partnership management

to approve the intermediate and final report connected with the project activities

to deliberate on the required activities and/or on variation required from each single beneficiaryto approve the final budget and modifications

exclusion of beneficiaries from the partnership or Partnership enlargement

allocation of the excluded beneficiaries activity

The SC- will meet 2 times during the year. Further meetings will be held in case of necessity. The SC decisions are blndingfor each beneficiary. Every beneficiary will be responsible for the foreseen activities in its Work Package WPj, the actlonswill be shared with the other involved beneficiaries. For every WP it will be selected a COORDINATOR and the same will

be charged in the arrangement of the Report and the outputs foreseen by the Work Package with the cooperation of all

beneficiaries. Each beneficiary assumes itself the responsibility for the realization of its own activities. Moreover each--_ __beneficiary engages itself:

* to manage its own project activities and cooperate with the other beneficiaries of the projectto nominate qualified staff and experts with appropriate experience

to offer all the necessary equipments for the good execution of the project

to stipulate the necessary assurance covering the risk of the committed activities

to carry out all the necessary relationship with the Public Administration

to offer the financial, procedural, qualitative monitoringd-atarequired by the Lead beneficiary-.,- - --In order to guarantee the work progress, a Project Manager, who must be named by the LB, will plan meetinqs (launch

events, meetings of the SC and TSC), reports and publicatio~s.Project Manger will employ a Management Unit made upof national and cross border se-cretariat in order to coordinate and manage day-to-day project activities.

The SC will be supported by a technical board named Technical-Scientific CommitteeATSC) (composed of experts,appointed by each beneficiary) whose task will be: scientific support, technical assistance, planning support, monitoring

and evaluation of the implemented ac-tivities. The SC will have the general overview of the project and its progress and will

define the implementation strategies, which will be validated by the Technical-Scientific Committee. The coordination of

the TSC is due to the Project Manager that will convoke about it the meetings previously to those of the SC.

02111/201123:26:16 2 ord.i0226/0 Page 6 of 65


7/65


8/65

technical-specific experience and tech-nological and management competences.

02/11/201123 26 16 2 ord1022610 Page 8 of 65


9/65


10/65

with advanced technological infrastructures, is equipped with security devices, systems, software procedures and qualified

human resources with ex-perience in ICT services. CED Fi.R.A is specialized in the development and integration of ap-plications and software's systems for Public Administration; it is oriented in supporting compa-nies in the ambit of

organizational consultancy and in the development and implementation of advanced technology solutions. Fi.R.A will beresponsible of WP 5 "Building up of Shared Knowledge Plafform (SKP)".

Competences capacity and kt?owhow of the Beneficiary 7 in?plernenbng project activities and res iltsFi.R.A has qualified competences in designing, implementation and management of integrated software's solutions, andKnow-How gained in the vertical software develop-ment for the management of the entire life cycle of laws. MoreoverF1.R.A has FIRA-Document that is a web-based informatics platform for data gathering, automation and management ofdocuments flaw able to manage different kind of information coming from various sources. Fi.R.A software's procedureshave been internally realized by CED office and are replicable depending on the required needs.

02111/2011 23:26:16 2 0rd./O226/0

Page10

of 65


11/65


12/65


13/65


14/65

work on the analysis' elaboration of the Italian ad European experiences, identifying best practices, realizing intervention

manuals and publishing editorial publications to support the advancement and the implementation of involved partners'

activities.

Cornpetences, capac~tyarid kriow how of the Beneficiaty 17 ~mplernei t tngproject activities and resultsG. D'Annunzio University offers its technical and methodological know how, acquired through the undertaken activities by

the Department of Environment, Networks and Territory (DART), lead partner of the Tratturi e civiltd della transumanzaproject, in cooperation with Abruzzo Region, that achieved quantitative and qualitative results about the experimental

valorisation, that took place in protected areas of A b r u u o in cooperation with the Department of the Environment, Italianand foreign universities, Local Bodies and Environment Organizations. Therefore, G. D'Annunzio University offers its

experience in the field of Strategic environmental analysis, in agreement with the Department of Environment and Abruzzo

Region. Particulary DART G. D'Annunzio University led the research project "SEA. Models of application of strategicenvironmental analysis in urban planning".

0211112011 23:26:16 2 ord,022610 Page 14 of 65


15/65


16/65


17/65

agriculture, institutional cooperation and coordination etc. All finalized projects were marked as highly successful by the

relevant contracting and monitoring bodies, thus, the Agency has highly positive results within the field

0211112011 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page 17 of 65


18/65


19/65


20/65

implementation of the activlt~esthrough its documented experience in the management and implementation of a sign~ficantnumber of cross border co operat~onprojects.

Competences, capaclty and k r ~ ow?owof the Beneficiary 11 irnl~kvn ntingproject activibes and resultsRegion of lonian islands1Regional Unit of Corfu has devel-oped capabilities through successive years of experience invarious fields of cross-border cooperation projects. The use of modern equipment and instrumentation devices adds to the

cost efficiency and high quality of services it provides. The practical experience of the personnel and their know-how on

business operations allows the Region of lonian Islands to develop, implement, and integrate innovative Projects. I t has

also been certified with the I S 9001 quality management. Technical versatility, know-how, and organizational flexibility aresignificant elements of the Region's successful operations. it is expected that all this experience in the administrative and

technical procedures gained through the participatioti cf the Region in several cooperation projects will be capitalizedduring the implementation of SPEEDY project that will add significantly to the image of the island.

02/11/201123:26:16 2 ord./0226/0 Page 20 of 65


21/65


22/65


23/65

Beneficiary role

institution

Project with Swedish Agency for international cooperation for supporting in infrastructure investment in scope of

Address

Legal representative /AuthorizedPerson

Contact person

environmental protection

Associate

EAS Project - Technical assistance for preparation of na-tional strategy for approximation in scope of environmental

~i l s t i~L ' t l o i i i s ameInaional nnoinal

Description of previous and curre17t)experier7ces r, CBC ai~cl:,ter~?ationalprojects

arigitagelnsiiiliiJ lli?gi ~ 7 a i lyus yranlelrlegai staiiis

St ee Nurnb e* Pos n/cPdsC h~ ; o b r ~ ~ ytdiJTS /I lil o tqc ;N,-f 'Surnamefz imc t~oni O l j aaii ie;surr)anie

protection

Ministarstvo zivotne sredine, rudarstva I prostornog planiranjaMinistry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning

Public Bodyomladinskih brigada 1, 11000Belgrade

SERBIA

SerbiaNebojsa Pokimica.Assistant minister

Lausevic Stanic

International programme Blue flag-Eco project for rivers protection, lakes and coast

Cross border reservation of biosphere, Agreement between Austria, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia

Fi i i l~ :~c~r l j~ssistant

Project for implementation of Stockholm Convention on long term organic pollution substances

S ~ O ~ in ibo rtiostai codec i t y~h NLIII

hniaii

Contribution of the Associate to the project activities

developing and implementation of efficient environmental assessment in Serbia-adopting EU legislation, policies and standards in scope of environmental protection

-sharing and solving common environmental problems in Adriatic countries

-promotion of environmental solutions and comrnon efforts in Adri-atic countriesAdded value from the panteclpation o i he Associate

The Ministry deals with activities related to environmental protection, construction and spatial planning and mining. The

Ministry includes following sectors: Urbanism and spatial planning; Construction, investments and construction intended

land; Planning and managing; Natural resources protection; European integration, international cooperation and project

management; Control and monitoring and Mining and geology. Managing unit in the Ministry is Agency for environmental

protection.

Omladinskih brigada 111000Bebrade+381 11 3132572+382 113131-355olja stanic@ekoplan gov rs

02111/2011 23:26:16 i i r A 1022610 Page 23 of 65


24/65

Work package

W 0 --T~ t l e Project Preparation

0211 1/2011 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page 24 of 65

Description

Respoi~s ib lebeneficiary Region of bruzzo - Directorate for Bureau Affairs, Legislative and ECPolicies, External Affairs,Energy


25/65

Actions

Titieescriptiorl

Responsible beneficiary

its financial execution -This action will ensurethe implementation ofthe project work pianand its financial

Crossborder Project Management and Coordination

This WP aims to assure a cohesive and effective coordination of the projects' activities and of theadministrative, legal and financial matters. A structure will be given to the partnership withSteering Committee (SC) and Technical Scientific Committee (TSC). Abruuo Region will be thecoordinator of the project and it will be directly the responsible organism facing the MA, both fromsubstance and an administrative point of view. LB will activate the mechanisms of connectionamong the beneficiaries that will contribute to the effective management of the project activities inrespect of the working plan. All the beneficiaries will be involved in the coordination of the project,through the sharing of special constituted organisms.

Region of Abruuo-Directorate for Bureau Affairs, Legislative and EC Policies, External Affairs,

39.900,OO 10aily communication.in this action has beeniforeseen also among:allbeneficiaries a dailylcommu-nication that/willbe establishedEz S hough ~&'ZEtLtion

1 password protectedplatform.Fulfilment of all!compulsory documents'by Partnerships(Subsidy contract fromLB,joint conventionagreerr~entbetween

40,500,001Monitoring activities -'MONITORING will be a:joint re-sponsibility;eac h beneficiary will be:responsible for qualityassur-ance of,deliverablesundertaken.

Seneficiaries willi submit periodicalreports (every 6months) to the LB who,n return, will

consolidate the,financialand activityi information in order toconduct the progressreports, the

, ;nterrnediary and finalrepxt, and submit:aem tc the IPA MA.

Role ofe ch brnehcl ryLB: Follow up of overallworkplan implementa-tion; establishment ofthe Management Unit,of the SteeringCommittee and theScientific Committee.All Beneficiaries: willattend to the SteeringCommittee andTechnical ScientificCommittee. They will

communicate thedetails of implemen-tation, the overallprogress of the project,and achievement ofprogress indicators.

LB: Setting thecommunication planand instruments;creation of intranet forbeneficiaries'communication on thewebsite.Beneficiaries:Continuouscommunication with

LB; reporting ofprogress and problemsencountered

The LB and each WP'sCoordinator will assessthe degree to whichdeliverables meetscientific standards,follow quality criteria,and specifications.Beneficiaries: Will

provide inputs andprogress indicators ondeliverables; self-assess its owncontribution.

Location

Abruuo Region

Abruuo Region

Abruuo Region

02 1112011 23:26:16 qLUrc{-'>,>.'.?I0 Page 25 of 65


26/65

Qualitative and quantrtat ve descnptlotrs of the oiitputs

D ,j,. I L J ~ ~ o I ~Elaboration of amonitoring plan andtools - Elaboration of amonitoring tool andelaboration of amonitoring plan

Evaluation -Elaboration of the ongoing evaluation (withpossible adjustments)and final evaluation.

Locafro;?Abruuo Region

ole of each b e r ~ e h c i a yAbruzzo Regioncoordinates theactivities of monitoringand con-solidation ofbeneficiaries' reports;reporting them to theIPA MA.All beneficiariescollaborate to theactivity of verificationbetween ex-pected andobtained results.

Abruzzo Regionevaluates constantlythe sub-sistence ofconditions andrequirements aboutrelevance, feasibilityand sustainability of theproject. Eachbeneficiary will supportWP's responsible.Once ended thepractical experience,WP's responsiblecoordinates the actionof final evaluation ofthe project. With thesupport of eachbeneficiary.

Abruzzo region

19 3611. Months2 6 014, 18,22,26 30

Date of deltvery1. Months6,12,18,24,30,362.Month 363.Month 4-64.Months 3- 5

5.Months 2-4

6.Months 47.Months

Target value

1. 1 for each reportingperiod2.13.14.15.16.17.68.19. 6

10. 211. 8

Qualitative and quantitatlve desc~ip f ionsof the rcsults

Descnplton1. Periodical partners progress report + Reportto the IPA Managing authority2.Final report3.Monitoring and evaluation methodology plan4.lntranet communication password protectedplatform5. Work programme and methodology toimplementation of the project, with workactivities division.6.Kick-off meetings and establishment:

Management Unit, Steering Committee andTSC

I Month 2 -2.Month6,12, 18,24,

3.Month 194.Month 2 -

B ,n e f r c ; a r y /~ r s1 All2.All3. LB4. LB + All5. LB6. LB7.All8. All9. Partner organizer of the meeting10. LB

1 1 . LB

Total aniouni487.750 OO

Descrtpiion1. Establishing of the managerial and organizationalstructure for carrying out the project activities - theManagement Unit; SC and TSC2.Verification betweenexpected and obtained resultsthrough monitoring report3.Coordination of "in itinere evaluation4. Organization Chart Flow for Partnership

021111201 1 23:26:16 2 ord1022610 Page 26 of 65

Rei e f iudr) . i i-s1. LB + all2.All3. LB4. LB

Target value

1. 1

2.53.14.1


27/65


28/65

1. 1

2.6(I launchingmeeting,4intermediatedmeetings, 1 finalmeeting)3.14.15.1

Date cfdeliveryI Months4- 5implementation;months6 -36maintainin

2.Months4,10,16,22,28,343.Months2

-44.Months2-45.Months2-4

6.Months5-367.Months4,10,16,22,28,348.Months12,24,369.Months12 -3610.Period1-36

1 1. Period4 -36

6.2007.8. 3 (one for each9.60010.2211.1000

Qualitat~veand quantitative descriptio ?~of the results

esc~ipftorr B


29/65

W PTitle

Description

0211 11201 1 23:26: 6 2 c,:ci K 2 2 5 ' 0 Page 29 of 65

3

Comparative Dynamic Analysis

Different institutional settings, stages of implementation of EU legislation and large production ofdetailed rules at local level have enabled strong differences in procedures and method-ologiesconcerning SEA (strategic environmental assessments), leading to basics problems limiting thesustainable development. Analysis of locallnational regulations, of the different institutionalsettings and procedures for SEA, might allow the delivery of a shared set of pro-posalsharmonizing the different provisions. Comparative Dynamics Analysis will evaluate the state ofthe art and compare the procedures of SEA currently set-up, better identifying gaps and criticalissues about procedures affecting the fulfilment of the objectives set by EU.

I~ es po ns ib le er ief ic iary l~ubrovnikNeretva County Regional Development Agency DUNEAActions

ACT

3.1

nest I I C : ~ O , IState of the art of SEAprocedures - Actionaims to collectgoverning provisionsfor SEA applicationt~ i th inthe countriestaking part in theproject, providing anoverall view of the'current shortcomingsconcerning

methodologicalconsultation and

public participation,quality auditI proceduraliweaknesses./inalysis ,willhighlight

i tke difficulties in: ~ntegratingSEA pio-cedures within planning

G I - ~ dro-grammingI >ro ;esses,I * the lacks ofir:formatioii:ile training needs.rt also aims to show-upand overcome the/ ..aif~~cultiesencounteredin setting-up of an ef-i e c t ~de cjcl-dination

I / i ; ~ i i ~ ~ e n:he SEA pro-esure and other EU

iaircictives on EIA,;isti-tat, 3irds, IPPCx i ~ ~ a r .

Start ng month0912012

tations on SEA.

RO Pof each hmclic; aryWP leader willcoordinate theactivities.All partners will beinvolved in thecollection andsystemati-zation ofprovisions concern-ingstrategic environmentalassessmentprocedures.issues,Associate will supportthe partnership in

providing the existingavailable documen-

Loca/innEach Coun-try and re-gions of partners

Endi i ig :ncn h0112013

Toia w:noi n E68.500,00


30/65


31/65

021111201 1 23 26 16 - 1 '022610 Page 31 of65

Qual~tabve nd q u a n t~ ta t~v ee s c r ~ p b o ~ ~of the outpiitsTarget v s l r ~e1 12 13 14 15 1

Date o fdel rve~yOutputfrom 1 to 4- months 6Output 5 -month 24

Qualrtatlve and quant~tat ive es riptions of the tesults

at least 1about the state of the art of strategic t i ,irurn~afltdl member forevaluat~onamongst local actors anz ~ r t sf slngle~nvolved ountr~es benef~c~ary

-escnptinn - j r . \1. Report on lnst~tut~onaland legal arl; ne allstate of the art (3 1)

I2. Report on the State of the art of SEAprocedures (3 2) I3 Defin~t~onof Comparative analys~sr a- nn:(3.3)4 Report on Comparat~ve nalysls (3 35. Updated Report on Comparatlve ar;z ,t~~s(3.4)


32/65

~esp ori sib le eneficrary l~ t ion lTerritorial Planning Agency

Titleescriptiotl

Actions

e partnership in the

, v .. 7 5; tion on wiii be

-..

7 .v5

Building-up of shared workjhg modelThis activity will be focused on the definition of a method for identifying and discussing sharedITEMS' that should be taken into ccourlt in the phase of web platform development.A result will be the building-up of a European network of organizations, actively working onenvironmental assessment issues, both theoretically as well as in a practical and scientific way.The above results will be achieved through the network that will be developed through an ICTplatform, using existing software firstly evaluated and classified according to the 'aim ofidentifying the one suit bleto the needs and issues setting-up by the project.


33/65

Qualttative a t~ dquantitative descnptior~sof the outp ~ i ts

\Np leader+ all

Quali la t ive a r~d uant ita t~ve escr tp i~o n.~of the iesirltsDate of d iiv iy

21111201 1 23 26 16 2 13 022613 Page 33 of65

I Month 12 Dtscnp1,on Targci~aii ic

I Methodology of shared work2.Month 12 2.Suggestions for updates to the m _ 2.1 Reportall 1 1 Report


34/65

ACT

5.1

5.2

5.3

Title

Descriptior?

Responsible benefioaty

Building-up of a Shared Knoi~ledgePlatform (SKP)Web platform is an advanced online tool, with different accessibility's levels, that allows workingon documents in an assistetl revision and in streaming.WP will start together with WP.1 in order to coordinate and validate the elaboration phase of themodel with the implementation of the web tool, allowing actions to go deeper with the requiredcharacteristics in terms of technical feasibility and effectiveness of the platform. The building-upof the platform will be followed by a testing phase. It will be facilitated through online support forall the duration of the project.

F1.R.A. S.p.A..

Location

abruuoplanning ofthe SAP - During thisacticrn the Platform'sexecution plan will bebuild-up starting fromthe proto-type]developed in WP4. The

/final design will containall the information anddiagram schemes.Within this action,using schemes aboutthe implementation of

,the platform will be

,defined as well.1012013 115.950,OOj 8~ 1 rl 1n g-up of SKP -Th15action includes theI C i e r -up of thePititform and its;lautich~ngover theinternet The ICT:stri.ictilre of the1 plsiiorrn will be

'designed according totne execution planunner Action 5.1.Once the Platform is up, a n d running over theintc rnet, it will beiauriched with severali ~ ck ; x~ : r , i ~ a t i~ nevents.

0112014 146.250,OO '-'ic:ertation to tne:ar t-srs and trainingab .list the use of SKP -i 4 ?i::lsh3p will be: rezii; i?ijin order tonrF.::,ent 7 the project'scar'.ners the SKP andTrair14ngsession will beorq3nized in the sameevrr.lr :training in loco -

abruuo

2 1 oleac/ efioircraryWP leader will providethe Executive planningof the SKP.All partners, andassociate, will supportthe WP leader.

WP leader will providethe Executive planningof the SKP.All partners, andassociate, will supportthe WP leader.

WP leader will organizethe event in Pescaraand in loco trainingsessions.Al l partners, andassociate, will activelyto the training both inloco and on line.

abruuo region

Ah:cr;:o Region).4finr the \vi)rksh3p E-(?~ .,*;i ' .ic~esslons will.:P .':alrzed accordingia ? e aifterent levels~2:+:id:.~ati~11and

02/11/2011 2326 16 2 ;22; Page 34 of 65


35/65


36/65


37/65


38/65


39/65

Qualitative and qu rtt i f f ive des cr~ pfi nt~ sof the res 11isate of dehve~yMonth 36

Oescifphoi--lmprovrng coordrnatron between the 35 - ~~ ic~ced i~ r ;

and other env~ronmental s sessmei? r rjduresprov~dedby other D~rect~veshrougk r eor ,p witrncreasedknowledgeat least 1

member forsinglebeneficiary

at least 1

02/11/2011 232 6 16 L G I Page 39 of 65


40/65

5 7 Totai project budget per WP

20 in.: I.:;

16,57

FtHA . S p AAdarcheRegfortLand. Envtronrnef?r

02/11/2011 23:26:16 2 0rdJO226/0 Page 40 of 65

TOTAL rct420.000,OO

0.00

0,OO

W ~f37.400.00

wrr rq43.700,OO

W ~5)33.200.00

34.200,OO43.450,OO

w 6)30.000,OO

WF)F -?f87.100,OO

W I [q148.100,OOeg on of brurzo-

ireclorate forBureau AffnrrsLegislativeand EC

okaes ExternalAffa~lairs.Energy

W P ~6)40.500,OO

VV U tl0,oo

16.950,OO16.950,OO

18.900,OO16.500,OO

46.000,OO32.750,OO

212.450,OO28.000,OO

57.000,OO80.850,OO

17,759,86

64.500,001 450.000,OO31.500.00 250.000.00


41/65


42/65


43/65


44/65


45/65


46/65

F IR.A. S p A

0211112011 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page46 of 65

SiafiOi ertlesosI-rtro ,e/ anddcron~:ncidati,i~~

WPO 10OO0OO0OO

WP q17.500,OO

0.00

11.900,OO

W P ~ I0OO0OO

7.200,OO

W P ~6)0.00

0OO0.00

W P ~48.500,OO

0OO0OO

W P ~~ )29.000,OO

0OO1.600,OO

WP6 )14.500,OO

0OO0OO

Wp7 iej9.500,OO

0.000.00

TOTAL li- 79.000,OO

. 0.00

20.700,OO

17.56

0OO4,60


47/65


48/65

021111201 1 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page 48 of 65

blolise Region

.L 42 94

0 00

8 28--1250 or: _ 27 74

4-70

16 34

0%- 0 20 00

-

0 00 0 00I

23 45'? 012 2b 15 i 2 . 3 ' 1 250 9IL I9 38 7 88' 10 db 9 2

OT t107 350 00

0 0 020 700 00

616 150 00

0 0 -0 00

J 11 750 00___OF

0 00

wP if0 00

000

0 00

W P ~E )39 500 00

0 00

7 200 00

iff

c Y f -3 ti PP

i ( i O i 1 i atl if l

WP4 ( f ~10 200 00

0 00

0 00

WPU E)0 00

0 0 00 00

WP5 i j9 000 000001 600 00

WP I el20 750 00

_ 0 0011 900 00


49/65


50/65


51/65

Dilbrovt jk eretva olinfy Regcoiiai D e v e i o p n ~ n tAgency DUNEA

0211 1/2011 23:26:16 2 ord./0226/0 Page 51 of 65


52/65


53/65


54/65


55/65

5.6 Benef iciartes spending forecast per WP nd per period

0211112011 23:26:16 2 ord.1022610 Page55 of 65


56/65


57/65


58/65

0 71111201 1 23:26:16 2 ord.10226/0 Page 58 of65


59/65


60/65


61/65


62/65


63/65


64/65


65/65

02c-0

I I----------

-----

-

?--e p___-___-____-X Oct_I __I x NovI ____ -_ .....--- eci.- - ... ..

Feb

t Mar i

C . -I

Jun_ _ ____ _. ---__.---

Documents

Detailed Work Plan of SPEEDY3