Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004

Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC

Nick Walker (DESY)

EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting

DESY

1 November 2004

N. Walker EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting 1.11.2004

The Global Context

EuropeanDesignGroup

USDesignGroup

Int.DesignGroup AsianDesignGroup

GDI

• ILC will be designed and constructed as a truly global project

• Initial phase (next 3 years) will see formation of the Global Design Initiative (GDI) supported by 3 regional design teams


ILC Projected Time Line

2005 2006 2007 2008 2015

CDR

TDR

GDI process

construction

commissioningphysics

site selection

International Funding

EUROTeVVery aggressive!


EuropeanDesignGroup

USDesignGroup


From our proposal:

GDI

ILC GDIConcept

“An additional goal of the EUROTeV proposal is to form the core of the European Regional Design Group, as part of the GDI.”

EUROTeVWork Packages

Beam Delivery System

Damping Rings

Diagnostics

Metrology &

Stabilisation

Global Accelerator

Network

IntegratedLuminosity

PerformanceStudies

Polarised Positron Source


EuropeanDesignGroup

USDesignGroup


The Picture post-ITRP Recommendation

GDI

ILC GDIConcept

We know now that SCRF tech. will be used for the ILC design.

This picture is therefore incomplete.

EUROTeVWork Packages


Damping Rings

Diagnostics

Metrology &

Stabilisation

Global Accelerator

Network


PerformanceStudies



EuropeanDesignGroup

USDesignGroup


The Picture post-ITRP Recommendation

GDI

ILC GDIConcept

We know now that SCRF tech. will be used for the ILC design.

SCRF must also be included

EUROTeV


Damping Rings

Diagnostics

Metrology & Stabilisation

Global Accelerator

Network


PerformanceStudies


SCRFLinac Tech.(CARE SRF,

TESLA, XFEL)

EuropeanRegionalDesignGroup


First ILC Workshop at KEK

• Goals of the workshop• Initiate the work for the ILC (pre-GDI) after the

technology choice of superconducting RF technology.

• Review the Technical Issues with SC-LC.

• Develop lists of design elements and decide whether they are • non-controversial in concept and may only need some

optimization; or

• should be considered open to reevaluation, in the conceptual design phase.

• Present the topics the different groups are interested in, and can contribute to the overall design

http://lcdev.kek.jp/ILCWS/charge.php



• Goals of the workshop• Initiate the work for the ILC (pre-GDI) after the

technology choice of superconducting RF technology.

• Review the Technical Issues with SC-LC.

• Develop lists of design elements and decide whether they are • non-controversial in concept and may only need some

optimization; or

• should be considered open to reevaluation, in the conceptual design phase.

• Present the topics the different groups are interested in, and can contribute to the overall design

http://lcdev.kek.jp/ILCWS/charge.phpImportant for EUROTeV


International Programme Committee

• Americas• Dave Burke (SLAC)

• Gerry Dugan (Cornell)

• Steve Holmes (FNAL)

• Europe• Jean-Pierre Delahaye (CERN)

• Olivier Napoly (CEA)

• Nick Walker (DESY)

• Asia• Kaoru Yokoya (KEK)

• Hitoshi Hayano (KEK)

• Kenji Saito (KEK)


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop

WG1: Overall Parameters

WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors

WG4: Beam Delivery / MDI

WG5: High Gradient Cavities


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP2Beam

DeliverySystem


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP3Damping

Rings


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP4PolarisedPositronSource


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP5Diagnostics


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP6ILPS

Bunch compressor


Working Groups


KEKILC

Workshop


WG2: Main Linac

WG3: Injectors



WP7METSTB


Scope of EUROTeV WP and the GDI• Scope of EUROTeV workpackages is well defined

• Three year specific programme already presented

• Immediate task of GDI will be to define baseline design for ILC• Many key decisions on design elements will impact priorities in

EUROTeV WP

• (We believe) EUROTeV programme is flexible and general enough to cope

• (original scope was defined as being ‘linac technology independent)

• We should be aware of these impending design decisions, and plan (detailed) tasks accordingly

• Much is still open• Waiting for the GDI and central design team!


Example of Design Decisions that will impactEUROTeV workpackage

WP4PolarisedPositronSource

Decision on base-linesource will define prority of scope in EUROTeV WP


ELAN KEK Preparation Meeting (2.11)

• EUROTeV’s input to the Global ILC Design Effort

• Entire project resources (€ and MP) is (by definition) applicable to ILC• We must stay within defined context

• BDS; DR; Polarised Positron Source; Diagnostics; Intergrated Luminosity Performance Studies (simulation); Metrology & stabilisation; GAN Mobile Virtual Lab.

• Exact project scope (details) can now be defined• we now know which collider we are working on

• baseline design should evolve over the next year

• We will ‘align’ ourselves with the global activities• forge collaborations with similar interest groups in other regions

• some currently identified activities may become low priority

• will need to adapt


EUROTeV and the GDI

AsiaAmericas

Europe (inc. EUR

OTeV)

WP

GDI

Inst

itute

s

From chaos… …comes order!

First major challenge for the GDI

AND for EUROTeV !!

Documents

Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004