Upload
josephine-joseph
View
232
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Tal Lavianhttp://cs.berkeley.edu/~tlavian
[email protected] Berkeley Engineering, CET
Standard Essential Patents3G and 4G Standards
1
Standards
Imagine you just bought an iPhone. You expect it to be able to call an Android, a 3G phone, a landline…
People want phones to be compatible with all other phones.
Therefore, there are industry wide standards of phone operation. Standard compliant phones can “talk” to other standard compliant phones.
Example of standards: Wi-Fi, UMTS, GSM, GPRS
2
Standards
Who sets the standards? Committees (representatives from multiple companies).
Voluntary Standard Setting Organizations (SSO)Example: IEEE-SA
The process involves long, painstaking negotiation between competing interests.
3
Standard Essential Patents
Wi-Fi covers many small details of phone operation (for example, data encoding)
A specific patent might cover the standard-compliant way of, say, data encoding
Such a patent would be standard essential.
4
Standard Essential Patents
When complying with a particular standard, instruments simply MUST implement a variety of standard essential patents.
It is no coincidence that when a firm takes part in an SSO, its patents are more likely to become SE.
Due to firms’ investment in existing standards, the more SEPs a standard has, the more likely it is to be upgraded frequently instead of replaced.
The creation of SEP pools leads to patenting peaks prior to pool creation.
Essential Patents and Standard Dynamics by Baron, Pohlmann, and Blind, 2011Patent Pools and Patent Inflation by Baron and Pohlmann, 2012
5
SEP Pools
Patent pools combine patents from multiple companies for licensing purposes
Easier to know what royalties to pay and to who!
Also, reduce royalty rates, transaction costs, likelihood of infringement litigation.
FTC considers them a good, pro-competitive solution.
Patent Pools and Patent Inflation by Baron and Pohlmann, 2012
6
FRAND or RAND
“Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory"
The owners of SEPs agree to license them out to anyone (even competitors) for a fair and reasonable price.
Note FireWire vs USB: companies that overcharge for their SEPs may render their respective standards unpopular. The goodness of an invention is easily trumped by its
cost.
7
RAND
All SEP holders must agree to make the patent available at a reasonable price before a standards committee makes the patent an SEP.
http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/pat802_11.html
8
9
Questions to Consider:
Is it possible to set a standard that avoids all patents or software copyrights?
Is it possible to set a standard with full knowledge of all patents contained therein?
Once a standard is set, can it be easily altered to avoid using a patent from a RAND-unwilling individual?
Is it acceptable that there is constant lobbying on the part of corporate patent interests during the standard setting process?
Treacy and Lawrance, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2008, Vol. 3, No. 1
10
RAND: what’s a reasonable price?
Many conflicting opinions! Should price be based on… Percent of available profit from technology? Industry comparisons in comparable markets? The number of patents held by the licensor as compared to
the total number of patents necessary to make the product? How innovative and important the patent is to the standard? How much it cost to invent the patent (R&D)?
Should price take into account the total royalty burden of someone bringing a product to market?
Treacy and Lawrance, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2008, Vol. 3, No. 1
11
RAND: what’s a reasonable price?
Judge Richard Posner (June 2012, Apple vs Motorola):
“The proper method of computing a FRAND royalty starts with what the cost to the licensee would have been of obtaining, just before the patented invention
was declared essential to compliance with the industry standard, a license for the function
performed by the patent. ”
Further court developments are currently taking place!
12
Questions to Consider:
If RAND was strong, binding, and clear, would there be so many ongoing SEP related court cases?
Is there some better option?
13
Application Specific Integrated Circuit
ASIC(Infineon X-
Gold)
http://whataiphone.com/schematics/iphone-4-back-circuit-pcb-board.html
Source:
14
Protocol Stack15
ASIC
DSP
ARM Modem
Display
ProtocolStack
Access Stratum16
MODEM
Access Stratum
Host Processor
Math Processing
Com Processing
What is a Protocol Stack17
Software that permits phones to communicate with cellular towers
Rules for formatting data in an electronic communications system
Logically organized in hierarchy of layers or a “stack”
OSI Layers
3G and 4G—integrating data into phones:
Application layer
Presentation layer
Session layer
Transport layer
Network layer
Data Link layer
Physical layer
Application layer
Presentation layer
Session layer
Transport layer
Network layer
Data Link layer
Physical layer
18
Protocol stack in mobile phones19
The “top” is the application layer -- the source of the data being sent (e.g., Skype)
The “bottom” is the physical or data link layer -- actual bits and bytes
Application layer
Presentation layerSession layer
Transport layer
Network layer
Data Link layer
Physical layer
UpLink and DownLink in Protocol Stack
20
Application
Application
Wireless Link
ThroughCell Tower
Application
Presentation
Session
Transport
Network
Data Link
Physical
Application
Presentation
Session
Transport
Network
Data Link
Physical
Analogy – Postal System21
Letters (i.e., the data units) are transferred between sorting offices (i.e., the protocol stack layers/modules)
DownLink (Transmit) Path22
End-user application (e.g., Skype, email, text messaging) program sends data
Data works its way down sending device’s protocol stack
Protocol stack processes, and manipulates data.
Data Sent by User
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
Wireless Link
Transmit Data Processing23
Header information added
Data or packets divided to form smaller packets
Data compressed
At “bottom” of stack, data is placed on wireless air link and transmitted to cellular tower
Data Sent by User
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
Wireless Link
UpLink (Receive) Path 24
Following reception of signal by receiving antenna, data works its way up stack on receiving device
Each layer reverses processing done by corresponding layer on sending device:
Data Received by User
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
Wireless Link
Receive Data Processing 25
Headers removed
Data packets recombined
Data decompressed
At “top” of stack, data is delivered to user application (e.g., Skype, email, text messaging)
Data Received by User
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
Wireless Link
Point-to-point Communications
Device to cell tower, communications via protocol stack
Transport layer
Network layer
Data Link layer
Physical layer
Transport layer
Network layer
Data Link layer
Physical layer
Data sent by user
Data received by user
26
3G Access27
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
Access
PHY
MAC
BMC
PDCP
RRC
RLC
Non Access Stratum
Medium Access Control (“MAC”)28
Situated between physical layer and Radio Link Control (“RLC”)
Acts as interface between those two components
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
PHY
MAC
BMC
PDCP
RRC
RLC
Non Access Stratum
Radio Link Control (“RLC”)29
Resides above MAC Obtains data from MAC
and transmits it to appropriate modules:
- PDCP in case of emails or other user
data- BMC in case of broadcast messages- RRC in case of control signaling
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
PHY
MAC
BMC
PDCP
RRC
RLC
Non Access Stratum
RLC Functions30
Data Segmentation divides data into smaller packets before transmission
and reassembles data after reception
Error Correction determines when data has been lost during
transmission and requests retransmission where appropriate
Memory Control controls memory used for storing and managing user
data, preventing it from becoming fragmented and drained
Radio Resource Controller (“RRC”)31
Located in layer 3 above RLC Controls other modulesControls portions of physical layerSets appropriate configuration for modules:
instructs MAC to enter into appropriate mode depending on whether it is processing email, streaming video, or voice data
instructs RLC to enter into voice or data mode as appropriate
3rd Generation Partnership Project32
“3GPP”Standards body that develops 3rd (and
future) generation wireless technologies that build upon the base provided by 2G (GSM) technologies
Responsible for the UMTS standard, as well as HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+, and LTE.
2G to 4G transition33
How is 4G different
OFDMA (orthogonal frequency division multiple access)
Simpler, flattened architecture
Higher throughput
Support for mobility between 3GPP and non-3GPP access technologies.
34
Concepts to know:
StandardsSSOs SEPsSEP poolsRANDOSI model 3GRLC, MAC, RRC4G
35