35
Economic Development: Global Scholars Forum Judith I. Stallmann, Professor Agricultural Economics, Rural Sociology, and Public Affairs Community Development Extension Specialist April 12, 2006

Economic Development: Global Scholars Forum Judith I. Stallmann, Professor Agricultural Economics, Rural Sociology, and Public Affairs Community Development

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Economic Development: Global Scholars Forum

Judith I. Stallmann, ProfessorAgricultural Economics, Rural Sociology, and Public Affairs

Community Development Extension Specialist

April 12, 2006

Constitution and Economics

Korea United States• Coin money• Foreign trade• Interstate commerce• Taxing power

– No export taxes

Basis of law

• If not specifically allowed by the law, it is prohibited.– For an economy, results in rigidity

• If not specifically prohibited by the law, it is allowed.– For an economy, allows flexibility

• Which do you have?

Local power• Korea United States

• Decentralized• Overlaying local

jurisdictions – General purpose

governments with taxing and ordinance authority

– Single purpose governments with taxing and implementation authority

Overlaying local governmentsSingle purpose governments Multi-purpose governments

TownSchool

School district

Hospital district

Water district

County

Budget of General Government

Local government

Structure of decentralized and overlaying local governments:

• Local governments have a lot of power

• Means need to collaborate and cooperate

• Means that they also compete– Often choose to compete on incentives and low

taxes– Could compete on well-run government, quality

of workforce, quality of life, business climate

Economic development

• National government determined

• Market determines

• Market with government policies and incentives– National government – Local government

Level for economic development?

• At the level of the majority of costs and benefits– Some projects have national importance

• National government giving incentives makes little economic sense unless it has an explicit regional policy

South Korea population by cities and provinces, 2000

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 0001

Seo

ul

8 G

yeon

ggi-d

o

2 In

cheo

n

9 G

angw

on-d

o

14 G

yeon

gsan

gnam

-do

7 D

aeje

on

15 G

yeon

gsan

gbuk

-do

10 C

hung

cheo

ngbu

k-do

3 D

aegu

4 U

lsan

11 C

hung

cheo

ngna

m-d

o

5 B

usan

13 J

eolla

buk-

do

12 J

eolla

nam

-do

6 G

wan

gju

16 J

eju-

do

Per

sons

(tho

usan

ds)

Cities

Provinces

Collaboration and cooperation

• Between governments

• With businesses

• With citizens

• With non-profit agencies

Citizen participation

Formal:• Elections• In some jurisdictions citizens can petition to

put issues on the ballot• Some laws require citizen input

– Oversight commissions– Public hearings

Informal• Local government may ask for citizen input • Citizens take an idea to local government

How to get citizens to participate

• Ask citizens for their ideas

• Work to make sure all groups are involved

• Meet where citizens are comfortable

• Have a history of using citizen input– Don’t ignore the ideas that you asked for

Economic development ideas

• All economic development requires a mix• A concentration only on manufacturing and large

scale infrastructure may not fit the current global economy

• Also may not fit the current national economy• Services (or tertiary) include a lot of business

services that are very important– Original idea was that services just served the local

population—still true for some services, but not all– What you call things influences how they are viewed

South Korean employment by economic sector, 1963-2000

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 000

14 000

16 00019

63

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

Year

Em

ploy

ed p

erso

ns (t

hous

ands

)

Agriculture, forestry & fishing

Mining & manufacuring

S.o.c. & other service

South Korean employed persons by occupation, 1963-1993

0

1 000

2 000

3 000

4 000

5 000

6 000

7 000

8 000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31

Year

Em

plo

ye

d p

ers

on

s (

tho

us

an

ds

)

OfficialSales wokersService workersAgri.,forestry,fishing workersProduction,transport,laborProfessional, techinical, andministrative

Occupations: 1993-2000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Em

plo

yed

per

son

s (1

000s

)

Legislators, officials & mangersProfessionals & techniciansCraft, trade, machine operators, elementary occupationsAgri, forestry, fishingClerksService, shop and market workers

• Electric power, gas & water supply• Construction• Wholesales & retail trade, consumer goods• Restaurants & hotels• Transportation, storage, communication• Finance & insurance• Real estate rent & business service• Public administration, defense, social security• Education service• Health & social welfare• Other public society, personal service• House-keeping service• International & other foreign institution

Social overhead capital and other services

Manufacturing

Economic development options

• Clusters

• Information technology can be broken into steps

• The creative class– Talent and technology needed, but not enough– Tolerance for new ideas and new ways of

thinking leads to:• Innovation and entrepreneurship in the private,

public and non-profit sectors• New ideas often come from outside the mainstream

South Korea graduates by school level, 1965-2005

0

200

400

600

800

1 000

1 200

19

65

19

67

19

69

19

71

19

73

19

75

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

Th

ou

sa

nd

s

Year

Gra

du

ates

Elementary school Middle school High school College & university

College and University entrants and graduates

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Nu

mb

er o

f st

ud

ents

Entrants

Graduates

Population

Richard Florida: http://www.creativeclass.org/

Scientific Citations

Richard Florida: http://www.creativeclass.org/

Patents

Richard Florida: http://www.creativeclass.org/

Some questions that were asked

Is political ideology related to type of industry?

A conservative city tried fashion and video and it didn’t work

What attracts creative class?

• Quality of life in area

• Other talent in the area– Clusters are built on this

• Tolerance in the area

Tourism: An island with international tourism, is looking

at manufacturing because tourism is too cyclical

• Transportation costs

• National tourism potential?– Mexico has done this

• Tourism areas have a high quality of life, which attracts the creative class– What options exist?

Everyone is talking about biotechnology

Still new but will be as diverse as manufacturing is:

• Algae producing hydrogen for fuel

• Bacteria cleaning up oil spills

• Plants producing plastic or pharmaceuticals

• DNA computers

• Gene therapy

• Nano-biotechnology for medicine

Everyone is talking about IT

• Everything that we do relies on it

• Friedman, “The World is Flat,” talks about breaking down the IT steps

Universities

• Do they increase the local level of education?– Also need jobs to keep people in the area after

they are educated

• Should you move universities?– Generally no, but can start new ones– Economies of scale for a comprehensive

research university (creative class)– Focused research university (creative class)– Teaching university can be smaller

Judith I. Stallmann

[email protected]

Population

Price index

South Korean employed persons by occupation, 1963-1993

0

1 000

2 000

3 000

4 000

5 000

6 000

7 000

8 000

1963

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

Year

Empl

oyed

per

sons

(tho

usan

ds)

OfficialSales wokersService workersAgri.,forestry,fishing workersProduction,transport,laborProfessional, techinical, andministrative

Occupations: 1993-2000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Empl

oyed

per

sons

(100

0s)

Legislators, officials & mangersProfessionals & techniciansCraft, trade, machine operators, elementary occupationsAgri, forestry, fishingClerksService, shop and market workers