View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EDUCAUSE 2001
Presenters
• Julius Bianchi Executive Director, Information Services, California Lutheran University
• Janet de VryManager, Instructional Services, University of Delaware
• George WatsonAssociate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Delaware
AgendaWelcome 8:30
Case for Technology and Learning
8:40
Connection between Technology and Learning
9:10
Sustainable Programs 10:10
Quality Professional Development 10:45
Strategies that Work 11:00
Moving Forward 11:45
Wrap Up 11:55
Case Study, Worksheet 1, page 2
Do I hear a motion to adjourn?
• Activity 1: Form groups of six
• Activity 2: Discuss the questions
Worksheet I
Worksheet 2
Case Study, Worksheet 2, p. 3
If it wasn’t for the last minute panic, nothing would ever get done…
• Activity 1: Take 5 minutes to read
• Activity 2: Match statements to stakeholders. Identify an individual for each
stakeholder
Technology and Learning
• Does technology enhance learning ?
• Does technology save money?
• Where do we begin?
• Where do we put our limited resources
The Issue
• Most researchers agree that it is NOT the technology but the learning principles and methods that the technology supports
• Faculty are often not trained in pedagogy
• Conceptual framework is necessary to help faculty understand how technology can enhance learning
Principles, Worksheet 3, p. 4
• Matching Principles with practice
• Activity 1: Identify 3 principles that could be used to guide the development of instructional technology
• Activity 2: Reflect on the principles• Educational benefits
• Non-technical activities that could facilitate
Other learning principles
Various theories
• Bloom’s 6 levels of thinking complexity
• Howard Gardners’ theories of 10 types of intelligence
• Constructivist theories
• Behavioralist theories
7 Principles for Good Practice
• Easy to understand
• Broad acceptance
• Backed by research
• At UD part of the underlying framework for the Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
• Cal Lutheran teams use as a conceptual background
7 Principles--Good Practices Encourage
1. Student-Faculty Contact
2. Cooperation Among Students
3. Active Learning
4. Prompt Feedback
5. Time on Task
6. High Expectations
7. Respect Diverse Learning Styles
1. Student-Faculty Interaction
• Increases student motivation and involvement
• Opportunity to share resources and problem solving strategies
• Gain fresh perspectives
2. Student-student interaction
• Responding can improve thinking skills
• Interacting increases involvement in learning
• Prepares students for the workplace
3. Student-material
• Students “try out” the information
• They experiment until they “own” it
• Students make connections between what they are learning and what they already “know”
• Skills to ask questions that we have not yet imagined
Proverb
“What I hear, I forget
What I see, I remember;
But what I doI understand.”
Confucius, 451 B.C.
Worksheet 4, p. 5
Matching Principles with the Technology
• Activity 1 Identify the principles
Check boxes where a technology can enhance a specific principle
• Activity 2 Evaluate the technologies
Best Practices
• Asking which principle (s) does this project support
• Considering the time and effort of faculty to learn, students to use
• Considering time and effort to develop and deliver—focused grants
• Underlying must be a good infrastructure for delivering information
• Next step: encouraging faculty adoption
Technology Assistance Grants
• Awards of staff and student time
• Provides focused project– Learning goals– Responsibilities– Timelines
• Useful for defining, planning, and delivering a project.
Encouraging Faculty Adoption
• Faculty/student
• Student/student
• Student/material
• Stimulate class participation
• Create collaborative groups researching on the Internet
• Create case studies that simulate real world experience
Problem Principle
Worksheet 5, p. 8
Case Study--Gosh darn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!
• Activity 1: Form in home groups. Discuss the questions
• Activity 2: Prepare answers for a committee report.
• Report back
Worksheet 6, p. 8
Delivering Quality Professional Development
• Activity 1: In your home group, discuss the questions
Diffusion of Innovations
Accessed 10/26/00 from http://www.udel.edu/communication/COMM256/johnc/diffusion.html
Rogers Interpreted for Higher Ed
• The Entrepreneurs
• The Risk Aversives
• The Reward Seekers
• The Reluctants
Source: Hager & Schneebeck, “Engaging the Faculty.” Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning.
Elements of Quality Professional Development*
Appropriate Content
On-going and
Sustained
Job-Embedded
SystemicPerspective
Client-Focused and
Adaptive
Incorporates Reflection
Active Engagement
Collegial
*Adapted from P. LeMahieu, P. Roy, H. Foss: Elements of Quality Professional Devleopment, University of Delaware and Delaware Department of Public Instruction
Managing Complexity in a Transforming Environment
• Relinquish control
• Look for patterns
• Reduce and Reuse
• Prototyping
• Boundary conditions
Source: Suter (2001), pp. 25-34
Worksheet 7: p. 9
• Inventory current strategies
• Comment on effectiveness
• New strategies to consider
Developing Support Solutions
• Chapter 5…
Faculty/IT Partnership
• Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education
• Practical Resources for Educators Seeking Effective New Technologies
Problem based learning at UD
• Created to promote reform of undergraduate education through faculty development and course design.
• ITUE Fellows receive hands-on experience in employing active learning strategies (PBL) and effective use of technology in their classrooms.
Faculty/IT Partnership
PRESENT• A teaching, learning, technology center opens in
1997• Faculty-centered, simulated classroom• Connecting learning goals with technology• Provides sustained follow up
Faculty/IT Partnership
Sustaining and promoting PBL
Worksheet 8, p. 10
Source: The Campus Computing Project © Kenneth C. Green, 2000.
Session Web Site
www.udel.edu/learn/educause01
Session Web Site
www.udel.edu/learn/educause01