Upload
phungmien
View
250
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Edited by: D.A.A. Scientific Section Martos (Spain)
Received: 11 may 2009 Accepted: 15 july 2009
Correspondence to:
Baljinder S. Bal
Director Physical Education
D.A.V. Institute of Engineering and
Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab. INDIA
Tel: 09876448434 (M), 0181-2200126
Email: [email protected]
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
75
Original
EFFECTS OF SELECTED ASANAS IN HATHA YOGA ON
AGILITY AND FLEXIBILITY LEVEL
Bal, B.S.1; Kaur, P.J.
2
1D.A.V. Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab INDIA
2Baring Union Christian, College, Batala, Punjab, INDIA
Bal, B.S.; Kaur, P.J. (2009). Effects of selected asanas in hatha yoga on agility and
flexibility level. Journal of Sport and Health Research. 1(2):75-87.
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
76
ABSTRACT
The present study was conducted to
determine the effects of selected asanas in
hatha yoga on agility and flexibility level.
The subjects for the study were selected on
the basis of random group design. Thirty
(N=30) male students were selected as
subject for the present study from D.A.V.
Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Jalandhar (Punjab), INDIA. All the subjects
ranged between the chronological age of
18-25 years. The selected subjects were
further divided into two groups.
Experimental treatment was then assigned
to group “A” while group “B” acts as
control. “Hexagonal Obstacle Test” was
used to measure Agility whereas “Sit and
Reach Test” was used to measure
Flexibility. The subjects were subjected to
the six week yogasanas training programme
that includes Swastikasana, Mayurasana,
Matsyendrasana, Paschimottanasana and
Gomukhasana.
The difference in the mean of each group
for selected variable was tested for the
significance of difference by “t” test. The
level of significance was set at 0.05. The
results have shown the significant
improvement in flexibility, since cal. t (=
8.122) > tab t .05 (14) (= 2.145). The
treatment of six week yogasanas training
programme also shown significant
improvement in case of agility, since cal. t
(= 7.376) > tab t .05 (14) (= 2.145).
Key words: Yogasanas, Hatha Yoga,
Agility, Flexibility, Hexagonal Obstacle
Test, Sit and Reach Test.
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
77
INTRODUCTION
Hatha Yoga has become increasingly
popular in western countries as a method
for coping with stress and as a means of
exercise and fitness training[1]
. However,
little is known about the physiological and
psychological effects of hathya yoga
practice. The school of hatha yoga attaches
a lot of importance to the perfect physical
form, believing it to be a way of attaining
spiritual perfection and to this end it takes
the help of pranayama (breath-control
exercises) and mudras (hand gestures) to
attain self-realization. Often seen as part of
Raja Yoga, the origins of hatha yoga can be
traced to Gorakhnath, the 12th-century
founder of the Kanphata Yogis. The word
'hatha' is derived from the two root terms,
'ha' meaning 'the sun' and 'tha' meaning 'the
moon'. Taken together, the term stands for
'union of force'. Hence, central to hatha
yoga disciplines is the harmonizing of its
positive (sun) and negative (moon)
currents.
Hatha yoga is the most popular branch of
yoga. It is known as a branch of yoga that
unites pairs of opposites, and its goal is to
achieve balance between body & mind by:
Postures (physical tone & awareness);
Breathing techniques (controlled
breathing);
Meditation (controlled concentration).
The three main elements used in hatha yoga
to attain its purposes are the body, the
physical part of man; the mind, the subtle
part; and the element that relates the body
with the mind in a special way, the breath.
Over the last 10 years, a growing number of
research studies have shown that the
practice of hatha yoga can improve strength
and flexibility, and may help control such
physiological variables as blood pressure,
respiration and heart rate, and metabolic
rate to improve overall exercise capacity[2]
.
There have been many studies on yoga and
its effects on physical function[3]
but with
the phenomenal and ever increasing
popularity of hathya yoga in the past few
years, there is a surprising lack of research
on this particular discipline and as a result
the present study had been undertaken to
examine the effects of selected asanas in
hatha yoga on agility and flexibility level.
METHODS
Subjects
The subjects for the present were selected
on the basis of random group design. Thirty
(N=30) male students were selected as
subject for the present study from D.A.V.
Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Jalandhar (Punjab), INDIA. All subjects
ranged between the chronological age of
18-25 years. The selected subjects were
further divided into two groups.
Experimental treatment was then assigned
to group “A” and group “B” acts as control.
The subjects were subjected to the six week
training programme of Swastikasana,
Mayurasana, Matsyendrasana,
Paschimottanasana and Gomukhasana.
Hexagonal obstacle test was used to
measure agility whereas Sit and reach test
was used to measure flexibility.
HEXAGONAL OBSTACLE TEST
Objective
The objective of the Hexagonal Obstacle
Test is to monitor the athlete's agility.
Required resources
To undertake this test you will require:
a) 66 cm sided hexagon marked out
on the floor
b) Stop watch
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
78
Test procedure
The Hexagonal Obstacle Test is conducted
as follows:
• The athlete stands in the middle of
the hexagon, facing line A
• At all times throughout the test the
athlete is to face line A
• On the command GO the watch is
started and the athlete jumps with
both feet over line B and back to
the middle, then over line C and
back to the middle, then line D and
so on
• When the athlete jumps over line A
and back to the middle this counts
as one circuit
• The athlete is to complete three
circuits
• On completion of three circuits the
watch is stopped and the time
recorded
• The athlete rests and then repeats
the test
• On completion of the second test
determine the average of the two
recorded times.
If you jump the wrong line or land on a line
then the test is to be restarted.
SIT AND REACH TEST
Objective
Sit and Reach Test measures the flexibility
of the lower back and hamstrings.
Required resources
To undertake this test you will require:
a) Sit and Reach Box about 30cm (12
inches) high.
b) A meter rule.
Reprinted from Horger and Hopkins, 1992
Test procedure
The subject sits on floor with shoes off.
Subject places bottom of feet (10 to 12
inches apart) against side of box
(approximately 12" or 30 cm high) with
knees straight. Tester places measuring
stick on box parallel to subject’s legs; 15"
or 38 cm at edge of box closest to subject
and end of measuring stick ("0") toward
subject. Subject places hand over hand and
reach as far as possible over measuring
stick without bending knees. Best of three
tries is recorded.
SIX WEEK OF YOGASANAS TRAINING
PROGRAMME
First stage in Hath yoga is Asana. The aim
of asanas is to strengthen the body, clearing
the impurities of nadis and to make the
body fit for sitting comfortably in
meditation for long hours. The present
study had been undertaken to examine the
effect of selected asanas in hatha yoga on
agility and flexibility level. The
experimental group received training in
physical postures (asanas, 90 minutes). The
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
79
asanas which were practiced every day
included:
1. Swastikasana
2. Mayurasana
3. Matsyendrasana
4. Paschimottanasana and
5. Gomukhasana
SWASTIKASANA
MAYURASANA
MATSYENDRASANA
PASCHIMOTTANASANA
GOMUKHASANA
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
The difference in the mean of each group
for selected variable was tested for the
significance of difference by “t” test[4]
. The
level of significance was set at 0.05.
Hypothesis:
Ho: µy = µx
H¹: µy ≥ µx
Level of significance:
.05
Inference:
Since calculated “t” is greater than tab t.05,
Ho (null hypothesis) may be rejected at .05
level of significance. Thus it may be
concluded that six week of yogasanas
training programme have a significant
effect on agility and flexibility level. As per
the study the above remark can be given at
95% confidence.
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
80
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The study was conducted to find out the
effects of selected asanas in hatha yoga on
agility and flexibility level. The statistical
analysis of data collected on thirty (N=30)
subjects. For each of the chosen variable,
the results pertaining to significant
difference, if any, between experimental
and control groups were assessed by “t” test
and are presented in tables (read Annex).
Table-3 shows that the mean of flexibility
of pretest of experimental group and
posttest of experimental group was 47.86
and 46.66 respectively, whereas the mean
of pulse rate of pretest of control and
posttest of control group was 50.20 and
46.8000. The “t” value in case of
experimental group was 8.122 and for
control group it was 0.414. Since cal. t
(=8.122) > tab t .05 (14) (=2.145), Ho (null
hypothesis) is rejected at .05 level of
significance. Thus it may be concluded that
six week of yogasanas training programme
showed significant improvement in
flexibility. As per the study the above
remark can be given at 95% confidence.
The graphical representation of responses
has been exhibited in figure-1.
Table-3 shows that the mean of agility of
pretest of experimental group and posttest
of experimental group was 14.70 and 13.42
respectively, whereas the mean of agility of
pretest of control and posttest of control
group was 15.41 and 15.03. The “t” value
in case of experimental group was -7.3 and
for control group it was -5.389. Since cal. t
(=-7.3) > tab t .05 (14) (=2.145), Ho (null
hypothesis) is rejected at .05 level of
significance. Thus it may be concluded that
six week of yogasanas training programme
showed significant improvement in agility.
As per the study the above remark can be
given at 95% confidence. The graphical
representation of responses has been
exhibited in figure-2.
From the results it is evident that the six
week of yogasanas training programme
showed significant improvement in agility
and flexibility level. The findings is
supported by the study conducted by
Galantino ML, Bzdewka TM, Eissler-Russo
JL, Holbrook ML, Mogck EP, Geigle P,
Farrar FT. to evaluate a possible design for
a 6-week modified hatha yoga protocol to
study the effects on Twenty-two
participants (M = 4; F = 17), between the
ages of 30 and 65 with chronic low back
pain showed improved balance and
flexibility[5]
. Likewise M.DiBenedetto,
K.Innes, A.Taylor, P.Rodeheaver, J.Boxer,
H.Wright, D.Kerrigan conducted the study
titled “Effect of a Gentle Iyengar Yoga
Program on Gait in the Elderly: An
Exploratory Study” on Twenty-three
healthy adults (age range, 62–83y) who
were naive to yoga were recruited; 19
participants completed the program. An 8-
week Iyengar Hatha yoga program
specifically tailored to elderly persons and
designed to improve lower-body strength
and flexibility. Findings of this exploratory
study suggest that yoga practice may
improve hip extension, increase stride
length, and decrease anterior pelvic tilt in
healthy elders[6]
. Study conducted by Tekur
P, Singphow C, Nagendra HR, Raghuram
N. to compare the effect of a short-term
intensive residential yoga program with
physical exercise (control) on pain and
spinal flexibility in subjects with chronic
low-back pain (CLBP). Spinal flexibility
measures improved significantly in both
groups but the yoga group had greater
improvement as compared to controls on
spinal flexion (p = 0.008; effect size 0.146),
spinal extension (p = 0.002; effect size
0.251), right lateral flexion (p = 0.059;
effect size 0.006); and left lateral flexion (p
= 0.006; effect size 0.171)[7]
.
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
81
CONCLUSIONS
Findings of this exploratory study suggest
that the treatment of six week yogasanas
training programme showed significant
improvement in agility and flexibility level.
REFERENCES
1. Schell FJ, Allolio B, Schonecke
OW. (1994). Physiological and
psychological effects of Hatha-
Yoga exercise in healthy women.
Int J Psychosom, 41(1-4):46-52
2. Raub JA. (2002).Psychophysiolo-
gic effects of Hatha yoga on
musculoskeletal and cardiopulmo-
nary function: a literature review. J
Altern Complement Med, 8:797
3. Hadi N, Hadi N. (2007). Effects of
hatha yoga on well-being in healthy
adults in Shiraz, Islamic Republic
of Iran. East Mediterr Health J,
13(4):829-837
4. Verma J. Parkash. A (2000). Text
Book on Sports Statistics. Venus
Publication, Gwalior, India.
5. Galantino ML, Bzdewka TM,
Eissler-Russo JL, Holbrook ML,
Mogck EP, Geigle P, Farrar FT.
(2004). The impact of modified
Hatha yoga on chronic low back
pain: a pilot study. Altern Ther
Health Med, 10(2):56-59
6. Benedetto M, Innes K, Taylor A,
Rodeheaver P, Boxer J, Wright H,
Kerrigan D. (2005). Effect of a
Gentle Iyengar Yoga Program on
Gait in the Elderly: An Exploratory
Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,
86(9):1830-1837.
7. Tekur P, Singphow C, Nagendra
HR, Raghuram N. (2008). Effect of
short-term intensive yoga program
on pain, functional disability and
spinal flexibility in chronic low
back pain: a randomized control
study. J Altern Complement Med,
14 (6): 637-644.
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
82
ANNEX
TABLE-1
FLEXIBILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL
GROUP
Pre-Test Post-Test
Sample size 15 15
Arithmetic mean 47.8667 50.2000
95% CI for the mean 41.8370 to 53.8963 44.3798 to 56.0202
Variance 118.5524 110.4571
Standard deviation 10.8882 10.5099
Standard error of the mean 2.8113 2.7136
Paired samples t-test
Mean difference 2.3333
Standard deviation 1.1127
95% CI 1.7171 to 2.9495
Test statistic t 8.122
Degrees of Freedom (DF) 14
Two-tailed probability P < 0.0001
TABLE-2
FLEXIBILITY OF CONTROL
GROUP
Pre-Test Post-Test
Sample size 15 15
Arithmetic mean 46.6667 46.8000
95% CI for the mean 41.5711 to 51.7623 42.0445 to 51.5555
Variance 84.6667 73.7429
Standard deviation 9.2014 8.5874
Standard error of the mean 2.3758 2.2172
Paired samples t-test
Mean difference 0.1333
Standard deviation 1.2459
95% CI -0.5566 to 0.8233
Test statistic t 0.414
Degrees of Freedom (DF) 14
Two-tailed probability P = 0.6848
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
83
TABLE-3
MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION (SD), STANDARD ERROR OF MEAN (SEM) OF
FLEXIBILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUP
Group Number Mean S.D. SEM ‘t’ Value
Experiment (Pre-test)
Experimental (Post-test)
15
15
47.86
50.20
10.88
10.50
2.81
2.7136
Control (Pre-test)
Control (Pre-test)
15
15
46.66
46.8000
9.20
8.5874
2.37
2.2172
8.122
0.414
*Significant at 0.05 level of confidence.
“t” .o5 (14) = 2.145
FIGURE-1
MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION (SD), STANDARD ERROR OF MEAN (SEM) OF
FLEXIBILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUP
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
84
FIGURE-2
P-VALUE, TWO TAILED AND ONE TAILED PROBABILITY VALUES OF A
T-TEST OF EXPERIMENTAL GROUP OF
AGILITY
FIGURE-2
P-VALUE, TWO TAILED AND ONE TAILED PROBABILITY VALUES OF A
T-TEST OF CONTROL GROUP OF
FLEXIBILITY
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
85
TABLE-4
AGILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL
GROUP
Pre-Test Post-Test
Sample size 15 15
Arithmetic mean 14.7067 13.4267
95% CI for the mean 13.6627 to 15.7506 12.4527 to 14.4007
Variance 3.5535 3.0935
Standard deviation 1.8851 1.7588
Standard error of the mean 0.4867 0.4541
Paired samples t-test
Mean difference -1.2800
Standard deviation 0.6721
95% CI -1.6522 to -0.9078
Test statistic t -7.376
Degrees of Freedom (DF) 14
Two-tailed probability P < 0.0001
TABLE-5
AGILITY OF CONTROL
GROUP
Pre-Test Post-Test
Sample size 15 15
Arithmetic mean 15.4133 15.0333
95% CI for the mean 14.3767 to 16.4500 13.9669 to 16.0997
Variance 3.5041 3.7081
Standard deviation 1.8719 1.9256
Standard error of the mean 0.4833 0.4972
Paired samples t-test
Mean difference -0.3800
Standard deviation 0.2731
95% CI -0.5312 to -0.2288
Test statistic t -5.389
Degrees of Freedom (DF) 14
Two-tailed probability P = 0.0001
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
86
TABLE-6
MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION (SD), STANDARD ERROR OF MEAN (SEM) OF
AGILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUP
Group Number Mean S.D. SEM ‘t’ Value
Experiment (Pre-test)
Experimental (Post-test)
15
15
14.70
13.42
1.88
1.75
0.48
0.45
Control (Pre-test)
Control (Post-test)
15
15
15.41
15.03
1.87
1.92
0.48
0.49
-7.3
-5.389
*Significant at 0.05 level of confidence.
“t” .o5 (14) = 2.145
FIGURE-2
MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION (SD), STANDARD ERROR OF MEAN (SEM) OF
AGILITY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUP
Journal of Sport and Health Research 2009, 1(2):75-87
J Sport Health Res ISSN: 1989-6239
87
FIGURE-3
P-VALUE, TWO TAILED AND ONE TAILED PROBABILITY VALUES OF A
T-TEST OF EXPERIMENTAL GROUP OF
AGILITY
FIGURE-3
P-VALUE, TWO TAILED AND ONE TAILED PROBABILITY VALUES OF A
T-TEST OF CONTROL GROUP OF
AGILITY