Eij Mrs 3011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    1/14

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCHOnline Open Access publishing platform for Management Research

    Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0

    Research Article ISSN 2229 3795

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH 125

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment

    in higher educational institutionsHarold Andrew Patrick

    1, Shiju Sebastian

    2

    1- Associate Professor and HOD - OB and HRM , Institute of Management, Christ University

    2- Assistant Registrar, Christ University, Bangalore

    [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    Human Resources Management is a set of practices that businesses incorporate to ensure that

    they have an effective workforce in place to meet operational needs. Since the 1960's

    organizational commitment is an exciting issue for managers and researchers. The need forthe study is in the context of a massive investment in human resource management in the

    educational institutions. 249 teachers from aided, private unaided and government colleges

    were surveyed. Two standardized, valid and reliable tools were adopted for data collection.

    Major findings indicated that faculty in higher education were highest on affective

    commitment followed by continuance commitment, the most frequently adopted source of

    recruitment was newspaper advertisements, followed by employee referral, the most popular

    selection technique was interview, followed by demonstration and on an average Higher

    educational institutions took around 30days to fill a vacancy from the time they received an

    application and engaged in atleast three steps to select a candidate. There was a significant

    relationship between HRM practices and Organizational commitment. Employee-employer

    relationship, recruitment, and selection significantly influenced organizational commitment.Employee-employer relationship, compensation and benefits, and manpower planning

    significantly influenced the overall HRM practices of the institutes. The results are discussed

    in terms of implications for higher learning institutes and future research.

    Keywords: Higher educational institutions, Human Resources Management Practices,

    Organizational Commitment, Affective commitment, Normative Commitment, Continuance

    Commitment

    1. Introduction

    India has one of the largest 'Higher Education Systems in the world. Every year, Indiaproduces 2.5 million graduates and this figure is just after the US and China. At present, there

    are 443 universities of which 251 are State Universities, 24 Central Universities, 130 Deemed

    Universities, and 5 Institutions established under State legislations and 33 Institutes of

    National Importance established by Central legislation. At the beginning of the academic year

    2007-08, students enrolled with the Universities and Colleges was reported to be 116.13

    Lakhs. Specifically 15.03 Lakhs (12.94%) were in University Departments, 101.10 Lakhs

    (87.06%) in affiliated colleges. After China and the United States Indias higher education

    system is the third largest in the world, World Bank (2009).

    1.1Human Resource Management Practices

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    2/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012126

    Human Resources Management is a set of practices that businesses use to ensure that they

    have an effective workforce in place to meet operational needs. Successful organizations are

    those which value, develop and nurture their human capital to achieve their organizational

    goals and objectives. Human Resource Management Practices is a term used by many

    organizations which describes the combination of traditionally administrative personnel

    functions with performance, employee relations and resource planning. The objective ofHuman Resources is to maximize the return on investment from the organization's human

    capital and minimize financial risk. It is the responsibility of human resource managers to

    conduct these activities in an effective, legal, fair, and consistent manner.

    They try to bring out the best in people by creating a congenial environment where their

    employees can continue to grow, improve their professional skills, exercise their creativity

    and derive greater job satisfaction. A survey conducted by the Association of Commonwealth

    Universities (ACU) in 2006 indicated that the development of a more strategic approach to

    Human Resources Management, while critical, is still a relatively recent phenomenon. Three

    quarters of the 123 Common Wealth institutions surveyed had Human Resources

    Management strategies in place and the majority of them were established in the previousseven years. The survey also found that human resource management has become

    increasingly professional and more closely aligned with institutional management in the past

    decade, with some Human Resources Management directors even having a seat at the table of

    the senior management group (e.g. the vice-chancellors committee).

    The Human Resources Management departments are charged with the responsibility of

    addressing wide-ranging changes within the university workforce (Daysh and Kubler 2009).

    Issues such as recruitment and retention, pay structures for staff, performance appraisal,

    development of new and evolving staff roles, ageing academic staff, changes in industrial

    relations with staff and the development of administrative tools to deal with these changes

    came prominently to the fore. The need to develop a strong leadership capability has been

    identified as an urgent requirement at the institutional level and in several cases governments

    have taken an active interest in enhancing these skills.

    1.2 Organizational Commitment

    Since the 1960's organizational commitment is an exciting issue for managers and

    researchers. Organizational Commitment is a psychological link between an employee and

    his of her organization that makes it less likely that the employee will voluntarily leave the

    organization.(Allen & Meyer, 1996). Organizational commitment is increasingly valued as

    a predictor of work behaviours and behavioral intentions (Jaros et al. 1993). There are threedimensions of organizational commitment. Affective commitment is a feeling of emotional

    attachment. Normative commitment is a feeling of obligation. Continuance commitment is a

    feeling that the costs of leaving are too high or it is too much trouble to go somewhere else.

    Any organization would take steps to ensure that there develops an affective and normative

    commitment among the employees and to a certain extent continuance commitment. Allen

    and Meyer (1990) believe that it is more appropriate to consider affective, (emotional

    attachment), continuance, (costs of leaving) and normative commitments (obligations to stay)

    as distinguishable components, rather than types of attitudinal commitment. A persons

    commitment to the organization therefore reflects each of these separable psychological

    states of commitment. (Allen and Meyer 1990). Therefore Meyer and Allen (1991) state that

    both affective and continuance commitment represent psychological states that haveimplications for whether an employee remains with an organization. Employees with a strong

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    3/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012127

    affective commitment continue employment with the organization because they want to do

    so.

    1.3 Organizational Commitment of Teachers

    Educational organizations such as schools, colleges and universities require individuals whoare committed to their profession and the well being of students. Organizational commitment

    is regarded as a prime requirement for any educational organization. The effectiveness of a

    teacher is determined largely by the way he feels about job and other teachers with whom he

    works and by his attitude towards the organization that employs him, and these are the things

    considered for the whole working force which determines the commitment of an individual.

    Teachers strong in commitment find it easy to be interested in whatever they do and involve

    themselves in it, wholeheartedly. (George and Sabapathy 2011).

    Committed teachers have strong psychological ties to their schools, their students and their

    subject areas. Firestone and Rosenblum (1988) suggest that teachers may be committed to

    teaching, their school, or their students and that their patterns of behavior vary dependingupon which commitments are assessed. Organizational commitment researchers have devoted

    much attention to the matter of identifying the predictors of commitment, which have been

    studied, not merely to produce commitment as an end itself, but as a means of linking

    commitment to desirable organizational outcomes such as improved attendance and improved

    performance Mottaz (1988).

    1.4 Relationship between Human Resource Management Practices and Commitment

    Efforts are being made to study and gather information about human resource management

    practices that are used in educational institutions and the effects these practices have on

    employees feelings of commitment toward the organization. Empirical studies on the

    development of organizational commitment in universities or faculties with different

    academic identities are scarce. While most of the discussion and research concerning the

    influence of management practices on employees commitment has focused on affective

    commitment, Human Resources Management is seen as a requisite to improve the

    commitment of individuals who in turn contribute to the institutional growth. It is being

    considered as a means of effectively reaching the organizational goals. One key dimension

    involves, the extent to which leaders devise Human resources management practices as their

    decision making tool to the extent to which they permit employees to make decisions.

    Although many studies focus exclusively on private sector companies (e.g. Beardwell and

    Holden 2001; Esker and Gerhart 1996; Pfeffer and Veiga, 1999), recently Buck and Watson(2002), based on Arthur (1994), used the commitment human resource system for

    measuring the potential influences of Human Resources Management practices on the

    organizational commitment of higher education staff employees.

    Empirical research reveal that organizational characteristics matter in policy implementation

    of quality management in Hungarian higher education. Certain organizational variables, viz.

    leaders' commitment to the implementation process, the involvement of external consultants,

    institutional reputation, and bureaucratic and political decision-making processes have strong

    effects on the implementation of quality management in educational institutions.(Csizmadia,

    T., Enders, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. 2008). Research by Lee (1971), Mowday et al. (1982),

    and Steers (1977) reveal that Organizational commitment is related to three antecedentcategories: personal variables, job and role characteristics, and structural factors. Age, gender,

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    4/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012128

    educational level, need for achievement, organizational tenure, positional tenure and family

    responsibility are examples of personal variables. Job and role characteristics contain career

    mobility, job Challenge, job level, role conflict, role ambiguity, and level of autonomy and

    working hours. Some authors argue that decentralization is a tool for increasing

    organizational commitment (Bateman and Strasser 1984). According to Wallace (1995a) and

    Mayer and Schoorman (1998), participation positively affects organizational commitment.The correlation between organizational commitment and communication is significantly

    positive (Galunic and Anderson 2000). Relationships of job and role characteristics with

    organizational commitment concerning job and role characteristics, both career mobility and

    job challenge are found to be positively correlated with organizational commitment (e.g.

    Bhagat and Chassie 1981; Kirchmeyer 1995 respectively). Further, the opposition of any

    combination of role pressures (Hrebiniak and Alutto 1972), i.e. role conflict, may stress the

    development of organizational commitment (e.g. Glisson and Durick 1988; Leiter and

    Maslach 1988). The level of autonomy in the work place is found to be very important as

    autonomy is significantly positively related to organizational commitment (e.g. Hall et al.,

    1970). The review of findings indicates a good basis of the effects of Human Resources

    Management practices and antecedents on university employees organizational commitmentwith reference to the present study.

    1.5 Need and Rationale

    Recent researches have suggested that a massive investment in human resource management

    has no impact on universities' overall performance. A survey carried out on behalf of the

    Leadership Foundation for Higher Education has shown that although universities' Human

    Resources Management directors say they now have well-integrated human resources

    strategies, there is no demonstrable correlation between Human Resources Management

    activity and the overall performance of universities against standard performance indicators.

    However, Human Resources Management directors responding to the survey admitted that

    they were not certain that the strategies they had put in place were effectively communicated

    to the academicians, who have to implement their policies and practices as line managers.

    The report, Human Resource Management and University Performance (2007), found that

    the least effective practices in higher education HR included performance management,

    succession planning and managing poor performance. More than half (51 per cent) said they

    were keen to introduce formal performance management and leadership development

    programmes into their university. However a number of researchers have established the

    relationship between Human Resource Management practices and employee performance but

    they mainly discuss it from developed countries perspective (Shahzad, Bashir, & Ramay

    (2008). The cross-strait employees between human resource management and valuecommitment have a positive moderating influence in retention and with negative influence in

    education. Shahzad, Bashir & Ramay (2008) undertook a study titled Impact of human

    resources management practices on perceived performance of University Teachers in

    Pakistan. The results of the study indicate a positive relationship between compensation and,

    promotion practices and employee perceived performance while performance evaluations

    practices are not significantly correlated with perceived employee performance. There has

    been no study in the Indian context pertaining to human resources management practices and

    organizational commitment in academia. Hence this study maps teachers perception of

    human resource management practices, type of organizational commitment, most preferred

    recruitment method adopted, the most frequently adopted selection technique, relationship

    between human resources management practices and organizational commitment of collegeteachers. The study will seriously consider the maturity of human resource practices

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    5/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012129

    prevalent in higher education in India and suggest some concrete steps in professionalizing

    human resources for effective teacher commitment.

    2. Methodology

    2.1 Sample

    The population for the study consist 11,298 college teachers in the various colleges of

    Bangalore namely Private Aided, Private Unaided and Government respectively. A sample

    consisting of 249 teachers, 37 from aided 166 from private and 45 from government colleges

    were surveyed for the present study, which is 2.2% of the population. Stratified random

    sampling technique was adopted to select the number of respondents under the three types of

    management.

    Table 1: Indicating the distribution of the Sample according to type of management and

    gender

    College teachers

    based on type of

    Management

    Population College

    teachers based on

    Gender

    Total

    Sample

    selected-

    College

    teachers based

    on Gender

    Total

    (Percentage

    (%)

    Male 1140 Male 13 .011Aided

    Female 710 2850 Female 25 .0338(1.3%)

    Male 4285 Male 72 .016Private unaided

    Female 45008785

    Female 94 .02166(1.8%)

    Male 350 Male 28 .08Government

    Female 313663

    Female 17 .0545(1.4%)

    Total 11298 249(2.2%)

    2.2 Measures

    1. The Human Resources Management Practices questionnaire was constructed and

    standardized by the investigator. The reliability and validity of the Human Resources

    Management questionnaire was assessed by the split half reliability technique which was

    found to be 0.756. The intra-class correlations coefficient was ranging from 0.656 to +

    0.974 by using the item analysis technique. All items of the Human Resources

    Management questionnaire are found to be significant. The corresponding validity of the

    Human Resources Management scale was found to be 75.6%. The details are presented

    in the following table.

    The Organizational Commitment Questionnaire by Meyer and Allen (1990) adapted

    andstandardized by Chathanparambil (2003) was used to measure the three components ofcommitment. The questionnaire was slightly modified and tried out by (Chathanparambil,

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    6/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012130

    2003) on a sample of 120-degree college teachers of Bangalore city. Item total correlation

    was computed for all the 24 items in the questionnaire. The obtained r value was

    significant at 0.01 level. The reliability for each scale (i.e. coefficient alpha) were found to be

    : ACS, .87; CCS, .75; NCS, .79.

    Table 2:Reliability Analysis of the Human Resources Management Questionnaire

    Summary Statistic Values

    Cronbachs alpha, full scale 0.884

    Standardized alpha 0.965

    Corr. 1st & 2nd half 0.615

    Split-half reliability 0.756

    Guttman split-half 0.756

    Cronbach alpha-first half 0.626

    Cronbach alpha-second half 0.956

    % of reliability 75.6%

    2.3 Respondent Profile

    The respondents were drawn from sixteen colleges from Bangalore city. The gender

    distribution was women (55%) men (45%). Type of employment was unaided staff (66.7%),

    followed by government staff (18.1%) and aided staff (15.3%). Most of the respondents were

    married (81.6%), followed by single (13.7%) and least being in the other (widow, widower,

    divorcee etc) category (4.8%). In terms of total experience, most of the respondents were

    in the 5-10yrs (32.1%), followed by 10-15yrs (22.5%), 2-4yrs (18.1) and the least being 15-

    20yrs (7.6%). There is adequate representation that is both experienced and relatively low

    experienced college teachers. In terms of experience in the current institution, most of therespondents were working since 2yrs (30.9%) followed by 10-15yrs (20.5%), 5-10yrs

    (19.3%) and least being 20yrs and above (4.8%).

    3. Results

    3.1 To map the college teachers perception of human resources management practices.

    Table 3: Indicating the mean and S.D for the Human Resources Management practices

    Human Resources Management

    practices

    Mean Std. Deviation

    Job Analysis 5.60 1.23

    Manpower Planning 5.50 1.09

    Recruitment 5.36 1.01

    Selection 5.17 1.30

    Induction/Socialization 5.45 1.02

    Training 5.00 1.39

    Career Development 5.24 1.03

    Compensation and Benefits 5.36 1.03

    Performance Appraisal 5.44 0.92

    Internal Mobility 5.03 0.99Grievance Handling Processes 4.87 1.19

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    7/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012131

    Employee-Employer Relationship 5.52 1.05

    Overall Effectiveness of Human Resources

    Management practices

    5.54 1.18

    Job analysis, Manpower planning, recruitment, Induction/socialization processes,

    Career development activities, Compensation and benefits, Performance appraisalprocesses, Employee-employer relationship and overall effectiveness of Human

    Resources Management practices was found to be moderately high. Selection processes,

    effectiveness of training practices, and Grievance handling processes was found to be

    moderate. Of the different Human Resources Management practices, job analysis was

    considered to be the most prevalent, followed by employee-employer relationship,

    manpower planning, and so on and the least being training and grievance handling

    process.

    3.2 To find out the type of commitment held by college teachers.

    Table 4: Indicating the mean and S.D for the dimensions on organizational commitment

    Organizational Commitment

    Dimensions

    Mean Std. Deviation

    Organizational Commitment 4.51 0.71

    Affective Commitment 4.89 1.08

    Continuance Commitment 4.11 0.96

    Normative Commitment 4.52 0.78

    The level of organizational commitment was found to be fairly high. The level of

    affective, continuance and normative commitment was found to be moderate. Of thedifferent dimensions of commitment, the most important was affective commitment,

    followed by normative commitment, and continuance commitment.

    3.3 To find out the most preferred recruitment method adopted

    Table 5: Indicating Friedmans mean rank test for methods of recruitment most frequently

    adopted

    Recruitment Methods Mean Rank

    Word of mouth 3.66

    Newspaper advertisements 2.64

    Employee referral 3.48Walk in 3.79

    Institute web site 4.03

    Job posting on internet 4.82

    Other print media 5.58

    Test Statisticsa

    N 249

    Chi-Square 291.757

    Df 6Asymp. Sig. .000

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    8/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012132

    a. Friedman Test

    The most frequently adopted source of recruitment was newspaper advertisements,

    followed by employee referral, word of mouth, and so on, the least adopted was other

    print media. These mean ranks were significant at the .05 level.

    3.4 To find out the most frequently adopted selection technique

    Table 6: Indicating Friedmans mean rank test for most frequently adopted techniques for

    selection of faculty members

    Selection Methods Mean Rank

    Written Test 4.64

    Demonstration 3.09

    Background information Check 3.97

    Interview 2.17

    Work experience 3.58

    References 4.68

    Other selection techniques 5.87

    Test Statisticsa

    N 249

    Chi-Square 469.841

    Df 6

    Asymp. Sig. .000

    a. Friedman Test

    The most frequently adopted technique for selection of faculty members was interview,

    followed by demonstration, background information check, and so on and the least

    adopted was other selection techniques. These mean ranks were significant at the .05

    level.

    3.5 To find out the average number of days required for selection process to make a

    decision from the time resumes are received

    Table 7:Indicating frequency and percentage of days required for selection process to make

    a decision from the time the CV is received

    Frequency Percent Valid

    Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid within 14

    days

    139 55.8 55.8 55.8

    15 - 20days 65 26.1 26.1 81.9

    20 - 25 days 9 3.6 3.6 85.5

    25 - 30 days 1 .4 .4 85.9

    more than 30 days 35 14.1 14.1 100.0

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    9/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012133

    Total 249 100.0 100.0

    In most cases (more than 85% of cases) the selection process was completed within 30

    days. Only in about 14% of cases did it take longer than 30 days.

    3.6 To find out the number of steps in the selection process

    Table 8: Indicating frequency and percentage of number of steps for selection process

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid 1 - 2

    steps

    49 19.7 19.7 19.7

    3 - 4 steps 139 55.8 55.8 75.5

    5 - 6 steps 43 17.3 17.3 92.8

    7+ steps 18 7.2 7.2 100

    Total 249 100.0 100.0The number of steps in the selection process generally varied in the range 1 - 6, with

    most organizations preferring 3 - 4 steps.

    3.7 Hypothesis 1: There is no significant relationship between Human resources

    Management practices and organizational commitment of College teachers.

    Table 9: Indicating Pearson correlation between Human Resources Management practices

    and Organizational Commitment

    Organizational CommitmentHuman Resources

    Management Practices Affective

    Commitment

    Continuance

    Commitment

    Normative

    Commitment

    Organizational

    Commitment

    Job Analysis .301** .111* -.062 .182**

    Manpower Planning .194** .165** -.105* .137*

    Recruitment .277** .156** -.028 .200**

    Selection .150** .025 -.148* .034

    Induction/Socialization .188** .048 -.242** .031

    Training .133* .099 -.028 .104*

    Career Development .134* .149** .075 .163**

    Compensation and

    Benefits

    .220** .114* -.063 .139*

    Performance Appraisal .274** .165** -.013 .207**

    Internal Mobility .113* .247** .026 .176**

    Grievance Handling

    Processes

    .216** .250** .006 .225**

    Employee-Employer

    Relationship

    .347** .203** .004 .270**

    Overall Effectiveness of

    Human Resources

    Management practices

    .313** .201** .009 .255**

    **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    10/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012134

    It was found that all the Human Resources Management practices were positively correlated

    to affective organizational commitment. These relationships were significant. The highest

    correlation was with employee-employer relationship (.347**) and the least was with internal

    mobility (.133*). All the Human Resources Management practices were positively correlated

    to continuance organizational commitment, except for selection, induction/socialization, and

    training. These relationships were significant. The highest correlation was with grievancehandling processes (.250**) and the least was with selection (.025). Manpower planning (-

    .105*), Selection (-.148*), Induction/Socialization (-.242**) were negatively correlated with

    normative organizational commitment and these were significant. The other Human

    Resources Management practices were not significantly correlated. Except for selection,

    induction/socialization all other Human Resources Management practices were positively

    correlated with organizational commitment. The highest was with employee-employer

    relationship (.270**) and the least was with induction/socialization (.031).

    3.8 Hypothesis 2: There is no significant influence of Human Resources Management

    practices on organizational commitment of College teachers.

    It was found that there was a significant influence of Human Resources Management

    practices on overall Human Resources Management practices. The employee-employer

    relationship, recruitment, and selection human resources management practices significantly

    influenced organizational commitment. The highest impact was employee-employer

    relationship, followed by recruitment and selection had a negative impact. Together, these

    variables explain 10.4% (R Square = .104) of the variation in overall effectiveness of Human

    Resources Management practices.

    Table 10: indicating (coefficients) stepwise multiple regression of Human Resources

    Management practices on organizational commitment

    HRM

    Practices

    Dependent Variable: Organizational Commitment

    Unstandardized

    Coefficients

    Standardized

    Coefficients

    Model B Std.

    Error

    Beta t Sig.

    (Constant) 3.223 .288 11.188 3.159

    Employee-

    Employer

    Relationship

    .160 .043 .239 3.743 .000

    Recruitment .158 .055 .226 2.885 .004

    Selection -.085 .042 -.157 -2.036 .043

    HRM

    Practices

    Dependent Variable: Overall Effectiveness of Human Resources

    Management Practices

    Unstandardized

    Coefficients

    Standardized

    Coefficients

    Model B Std.

    Error

    Beta t Sig.

    (Constant) -.346 .989 -.370 .712

    Employee-

    Employer

    Relationship

    .253 .034 .377 7.379 .000

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    11/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012135

    Compensation

    and benefits

    .095 . 016 305 5.858 .000

    Manpower

    planning

    .160 . 032 245 5.020 .000

    HRM

    Practices

    Dependent Variable: Affective Commitment

    Unstandardized

    Coefficients

    Standardized

    Coefficients

    Model B Std.

    Error

    Beta t Sig.

    (Constant) 2.153 .419 5.138 .000

    Employee-

    Employer

    Relationship

    .297 .063 .290 4.733 .000

    Recruitment .204 .065 .192 3.131 .002

    HRM Practices Dependent Variable: Continuance Commitment

    Unstandardized

    Coefficients

    Standardized

    Coefficients

    Model B Std.

    Error

    Beta t Sig.

    (Constant) 2.672 .321 8.328 .000

    Grievance

    Handling Process

    .136 .057 .168 2.363 .019

    Internal Mobility .156 .069 .161 2.256 .025

    HRM Practices Dependent Variable: Normative Commitment

    UnstandardizedCoefficients

    StandardizedCoefficients

    Model B Std.

    Error

    Beta t Sig.

    (Constant) 5.074 .311 16.331 .000

    Induction/Socialization -.227 .050 -.298 -4.581 .000

    Career Development .130 .049 .172 2.643 .009

    It was found that employee-employer relationship, compensation and benefits, and manpower

    planning human resources management practices significantly influenced overall

    effectiveness of human resources management practices. The highest impact was employee-

    employer relationship, followed by compensation and benefits. Together, these variables

    explain 55.4% (R Square = .554) of the variation in overall effectiveness of human resources

    management practices.

    It was found that employee-employer relationship and recruitment human resources

    management practices significantly influenced affective commitment. Employee-employer

    relationship was found to have almost twice the impact on affective commitment than

    recruitment. Together these variables explain only 15.4% (R Square = .154) of the variation

    in affective commitment. The other human resources management practices did not

    significantly influence affective organizational commitment.

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    12/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012136

    It was found that the grievance handling process and internal mobility human resources

    management practices significantly influenced continuance commitment. Together these

    variables explain only 8.2% (R Square = .082) of the variation in continuance commitment.

    The other human resources management practices did not significantly influence continuance

    organizational commitment.

    It was found that induction/socialization and career development human resources

    management practices significantly influenced normative commitment. Induction/

    socialization were found to have almost twice the impact on normative commitment as

    compared to career development. However, together these variables explain only 8.5% (R

    Square = .085) of the variation in normative commitment.

    4. Discussions

    The study has found a significant and positive relation between human resources

    management practices and organizational commitment, therefore educational institutions

    need to explicitly define the structural hierarchy in the institution, should formulate policiesand procedures on the duties, responsibilities of individuals to increase the level of

    commitment of teachers. Effective recruitment methods for attracting the best talent should

    be employed. The commitment of the teachers would increase when employees are given a

    fair chance in the internal promotion. Policies with equal opportunities with a competitive

    pay package, opportunities for interaction with management are some of the practices

    organizations can incorporate to increase the commitment of the teachers.

    Maintaining a close work relationship among faculty and other staff, considering internal

    members first for promotion and adopting newspaper advertisement and employee referral as

    the most effective recruitment technique will increase teachers emotional attachment to,

    identification with and involvement in the organization. Teachers will continue employment

    with the organization because they willingly want to do so.

    Having a grievance handling procedure, scope for faculty to discuss difficult matters with the

    management, settling grievances at the departmental level, collective decision making, and

    encouraging faculty to express dissatisfaction, having a policy for promotion and

    communicating it, demotion and termination and basing promotions on merit will increase

    continuance commitment of teachers who will remain because they need to do so. Organizing

    a formal induction programme for newcomers very effectively, creating bonds between

    seniors and new faculty members, organizing several informal activities to foster core values

    of the institute, conducting periodic orientation programmes to reflect on work culture, createa personal development plan for each faculty, career promotions to be based on a documented

    procedure, having a clear career path and providing faculty with ample opportunities for

    growth and development will increase feeling of obligation to continue employment.

    Teachers with a high level of normative commitment feel that they ought to remain with the

    organization.

    5. Conclusion

    Organizational commitment of teachers is an issue that has attracted the interest of

    researchers and educationists. The present study found that there was a significant

    relationship between human resources practices and commitment of college teachers. Thestudy also found that human resource management practices impact the type of commitment.

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    13/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012137

    This study confirms that both human resources management practices and organizational

    commitment congruence create organizational success and develop competitive advantage for

    educational institutions. Thus educational leaders can use human resource management

    practices to enhance commitment of their teachers. College leadership initiative should focus

    on developing and professionalizing human resources management practices in order to build

    a sustainable, competitive environment in the institution.

    6. References

    1. Allen, N. J & Meyer, J. P (1990), The measurement and antecedents of affective,continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational

    Psychology, 63(1), pp 1-18.

    2. Allen, N. J and Meyer, J, P (1996), Affective, continuance and normativecommitment in the organization: An examination of construct validity, Journal of

    Vocational Behavior, 49, 252276.

    3. Bateman and Strasser, (1984), A longitudinal Analysis of Antecedents ofOrganizational Commitment, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), pp 95-112.

    4. Beardwell, I and Holden, L (2001), Human Resource Management : A contemporaryapproach, London :Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    5. Csizmadia, T., Enders, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2008), Quality management inhungarian higher education: Organisational responses to governmental policy, Higher

    Education, 56(4), pp 439-439-455. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9103

    6. Esker, B & Gerhart, B (1996), The Impact of Human Resource Management onOrganizational Performance: Progress and Prospects, Academy of Management

    Journal, 39(4), pp 779- 801.

    7. Bhagat, R.S & Chassie, M.B, (1981), Determinants of Organizational Commitment inWorking Women: Some Implications for Organizational Integration, Journal of

    Occupational Behaviour, 2(1), pp 17-30.

    8. Buck, J.M &Watson, J.L (2002), Retaining Staff Employees: The relationshipbetween Human Resources Management Strategies and Organizational Commitment,

    Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), pp 175-193.

    9. Galunic, D.C & Anderson. E (2000), From Security to Mobility: GeneralisedInvestments in Human Capital and Agent Commitment Organization Science, 11(1),

    pp 1- 20.

    10.George, L. & Sabapathy, T (2011), Work Motivation of Teachers: Relationship withorganizational Commitment, Canadian Social Science, 7(1), pp. 90- 99.

    11.Glisson,C and Durick,M , Predictors of Job Satisfaction and OrganizationalCommitment in Human Service Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly,

    33(1), pp 61-81.

  • 7/22/2019 Eij Mrs 3011

    14/14

    Human resources management practices influence on faculty commitment in higher educational institutions

    Harold Andrew Patrick, Shiju Sebastian

    ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

    Volume 3 Issue 1, 2012138

    12.Firestone,W.A and Rosenblum,S (1988), Building commitment in urban high schools,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299.

    13.Hrebeniak, L.C & Alutto, J.A (1973), Personal and role-related factors in thedevelopment of organizational commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, pp

    555-557.

    14.Jaros, S.T, Jermier, J.M, Koehler, J.W& Sincich, T (1993), Effects of continuance,affective and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: an evaluation of eight

    structural equation models, Academy of Management Journal, 7(1), pp 122- 149.

    15.Shahzad, K., Bashir, S., & Ramay, M. I. (2008), Impact of HR Practices on PerceivedPerformance of University Teachers in Pakistan, International Review of Business

    Research Papers, 4(2), pp 302-315.

    16.Lee, S. M (1971), An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification, Academyof Management Journal,14(2), pp 213-26.

    17.Leiter, M. P & Maslac. C, (1988), The Impact of Interpersonal Environment onBurnout and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(4),

    pp 297- 308.

    18.Mottaz (1988), Determinants of Organizational Commitment, Human Relations, 41,pp 467-482,

    19.Paul, A. K & Anantharaman, R. N. (2004), Influence of HRM practices onorganizational commitment: A study among software professionals in India, Human

    Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), pp 77-88.

    20.Pfeffer & Veiga, J. F(1999), Putting People First for Organizational Success,Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), pp 37- 48.

    21.Porter, L.W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R.T. & Boulian, P.V. (1974), OrganizationalCommitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians, Journal

    of Applied Psychology, 59(5), pp 603-609.

    22.Stup, R. E., Hyde, J., & Holden, L.A, (2006), Relationships between Selected HumanResource Management Practices and Dairy Farm Performance, Journal of Dairy

    Science, 89(3), pp 1116-1120.