1
UQ-CCSG Centre for Coal Seam Gas Enhancing CSG well production through BHP control Research Team: Benjamin Wu, Mahshid Firouzi, Thomas E. Rufford and Brian Towler - Centre for Coal Seam Gas & School of Chemical Engineering Problem definition The estimation of counter-current two-phase flow pressure profiles is important in a wide range of industrial processes, including the prediction of flowing bottom-hole pressure (FBHP) for the design of coal seam gas (CSG) wells and artificial lift. Leaders of the CSG industry are currently using simulators containing models that were originally developed for conventional wells (co-current flow in pipe) for their CSG developments (counter-current flow in annuli). Project objectives Results Experimental setup To produce a system model for predicting the FBHP in CSG wells. 1. Develop mathematical models for the pressure gradient of each unique flow regime 2. Design an experimental rig resembling a typical CSG well 3. Conduct lab tests for identification of flow regimes and measurement of associated pressure drops and hold-ups 4. Determine the conditions for onset of slugging and free flow 5. Validate/modify our mathematical models for the FBHP Figure 1. Two-phase flow regimes across a well-bore Figure 5. Modelling results for liquid rate vs. void fraction Experimental measurements: 1. Flow regimes Visual observation Videography 2.Differential pressure and FBHP Pressure transducers 3. Holdup Image analysis Photo diode Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) 4.Effect of liquid properties Test formation water 5.Maximum dewatering rate Detect gas carry over Parameter 7” well Casing ID 170 mm (6.69“) Tubing OD 70 mm (2.76") Rig height 8.0 m Test section 6.0 m Max. air flow 7,500 Lpm (380 MSCFD) Max. water flow 1,200 Lpm (10,000 BBLD) 2m obs. window Pressure tap Figure 2. Experimental setup of counter-current two-phase flow in an annulus Figure 3. Schematic of the experimental rig Figure 4. Pressure and flow rate log data Experimental results and corresponding flow rates are monitored in real time and recorded as logs. A transition to the annular flow regime, gas continuous phase, was observed when water flow rate was increased. Shifting from a liquid continuous phase to a gas continuous phase has the most significant impact on the pressure data. Models have shown that in counter-current two-phase flows, water flow contributes to increased void fraction by decreasing bubble rise velocity and increasing gas retention time. Void fraction, or hold-up, is a key criteria in the description of flow regimes.

Enhancing CSG well production through BHP control€¦ · Enhancing CSG well production through BHP control Research Team: Benjamin Wu, Mahshid Firouzi, Thomas E. Ruffordand Brian

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Enhancing CSG well production through BHP control€¦ · Enhancing CSG well production through BHP control Research Team: Benjamin Wu, Mahshid Firouzi, Thomas E. Ruffordand Brian

UQ-CCSGCentre for Coal Seam Gas

Enhancing CSG well production through BHP controlResearch Team: Benjamin Wu, Mahshid Firouzi, Thomas E. Rufford and Brian Towler - Centre for Coal Seam Gas & School of Chemical Engineering

Problem definition The estimation of counter-current two-phase flow pressureprofiles is important in a wide range of industrial processes,including the prediction of flowing bottom-hole pressure(FBHP) for the design of coal seam gas (CSG) wells andartificial lift.

Leaders of the CSG industry are currently using simulatorscontaining models that were originally developed forconventional wells (co-current flow in pipe) for their CSGdevelopments (counter-current flow in annuli).

Project objectives

ResultsExperimental setup

To produce a system model for predicting the FBHP in CSG wells.1. Develop mathematical models for the pressure gradient of

each unique flow regime2. Design an experimental rig resembling a typical CSG well3. Conduct lab tests for identification of flow regimes and

measurement of associated pressure drops and hold-ups4. Determine the conditions for onset of slugging and free flow5. Validate/modify our mathematical models for the FBHP

Figure 1. Two-phase flow regimes across a well-bore

Figure 5. Modelling results for liquid rate vs. void fraction

Experimental measurements:1.Flow regimes

• Visual observation• Videography

2.Differential pressure and FBHP• Pressure transducers

3.Holdup• Image analysis• Photo diode• Distributed Acoustic Sensing

(DAS)4.Effect of liquid properties

• Test formation water5.Maximum dewatering rate

• Detect gas carry overParameter 7” well

Casing ID 170 mm (6.69“)Tubing OD 70 mm (2.76")Rig height 8.0 mTest section 6.0 mMax. air flow 7,500 Lpm (380 MSCFD)Max. water flow 1,200 Lpm (10,000 BBLD)

2m obs.window

Pressure tap

Figure 2. Experimental setup of counter-current two-phase flow in an annulus

Figure 3. Schematic of the experimental rig

Figure 4. Pressure and flow rate log data

Experimental results and corresponding flow rates aremonitored in real time and recorded as logs.

A transition to the annular flow regime, gas continuousphase, was observed when water flow rate was increased.Shifting from a liquid continuous phase to a gas continuousphase has the most significant impact on the pressure data.

Models have shown that in counter-current two-phase flows,water flow contributes to increased void fraction bydecreasing bubble rise velocity and increasing gas retentiontime. Void fraction, or hold-up, is a key criteria in thedescription of flow regimes.