Upload
nicolas-paez
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
1/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
1
1
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
2/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
2
.INTRODUCTION 3
. DEFINITION.4
. COMPONENTS OF REGIME5
.THE IMPORTANCE OF REGIMES.5
.FORMATION.5
.INTERNATIONAL REGIMES....6
.SECURITY REGIMES..7
.VARIABLES..8
.PRINCIPLES AND NORMS12
.DECISSION MAKING12
.ACTORS13
.THE DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF REGIME THEORY.14
.COGNITIVE REGIMES.14
.RATIONALIST REGIMES.15
.NEOLIBERAL REGIMES16
.INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND INTERNAL COORDINATION.17
.GAME THEORY.19
.COMMUNICATION REGIMES.19
.ECONOMIC REGIMES20
.IMPLICATIONS OF REGIMES.21
.THE REFORM OF REGIMES INSTITUTIONS..23
.CONCLUSION24
Formatted:Left
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
3/26
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
4/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
4
Therefore, in the following sections we will aboard more deeply the nature of Regimes
Theories as well as their components, actors, principles, rules and decision making to
comprehend the challenges and obstacles that Regimes have as well as the possible
solutions to improve and renovate the basic principles of Regimes Theories.
1.2. DEFINITION.
The consensus about a universal definition on Regime Theory has been on
discussion since 1982. As a result of this concern, in this same year, a conference was
recognized to talk about the role of International Organizations and International
Regimes, trying to find an agreement about a universal definition. However, the
definition presented in that conference by Stephen Krasner wasnt enough solid:implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around
which actor expectations converge in a given area of international relations.3
For this reason, different policymakers have been trying to give a concrete
definition of Regime Theory. One of the most important definitions is made by Oran R.
Young which says: Regimes are social institutions governing the actions of those
involved in specifiable activities or set or activities like all institutions, they are
practices consisting of recognized roles linked together by clusters of rules,
conventions, governing relations the occupants of these roles. The Regime Theorytries to explain the intrinsic grow of interdependence among states as well as new forms
of coordination and collaboration.4
Another explanation of Regime Theory is the one presented by Robert Keohane:
Regimes are institutions with explicit rules, agreed upon governments that pertain to
particular set of issues in International relations.5 The magnitude of the founding of
basics principles toward a definition of Regimes Theory let us grasps the appliance of
International Law in the relations among actors. Even when there is a not a consensus
among with definition of Regime Theory is more complete, both definitions presentedby Young and Keohane are reasonably acceptable by analytics on Regime Theory. The
3Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell University Press,
1983. 2.4Young, R Oran. International Cooperation: Bulding Regimes for Natural Resources. s.f. 11.
5Keohane, Robert. Neoliberal Institutions: A perspective on World Politics. s.f.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
5/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
5
power and coercion, self-interest and reciprocal benefits as well as the liberal tradition
are the primal motives for the institutionalization of Regimes and the function that they
have in the international arena in the conception of international governance and the
behavior of States.6
1.3.COMPONENTS OF REGIMES
The principle components of Regimes are the following:
PRINCIPLES
NORMS
RULES
DECISSION MAKING
PROCEDURES
According to Keohane and Nye7, the components of a Regime are needed to
regularized the behavior and control its effects. In addition, for Hedley Bull8, these
components make possible the adherence of the institutions by formulating,
communicating, administering, enforcing, interpreting, legitimating and adopting the
requirements that involved the acceptance of a Regime.
THE IMPORTANCE OF REGIMES.
(1)FORMATION.
The main aim of Regimes is the facilitation of agreements. The concept of
Regimes implies not only norms and expectations that make possible cooperation, but
a form of cooperation that is more than the following of short term self interest9. In
view of the fact that Regimes include principles and norms, the utility function that is
being maximized must embody some sense of general obligation one such principle;
reciprocity, is emphasized in general obligation. Therefore, in a world of sovereign
6Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 12.
7 Krasner, Stephen. International Regimes. s.f. 2.
8Hedley, Bull. Anarchical Society. Columbia University Press, 1977.
9 Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell University
Press, 1983. 2.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
6/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
6
states, the primal function of Regimes is to coordinate states behavior to achieve desired
outcomes in particular issue-areas.10
The formation of regimes responds to the
necessity to establish agreements in a long term, avoiding the selfish interest on the
states and creating common interest. As an example, the idea of collective security,
transforms the regimes in market of transactions where the interested can have possible
outcomes as well the other part.11
However, the ideal of the regimes is the creation of a
system regulate by the interest of two or more parts taking into account that the main
condition for the continuance of Regime is the specific auto protection of states: egoistic
self-interest. Consequently, the regime materialization is the product of the
disorganization produced mainly after WWII and the possible decline of U.S as the
hegemony. As a result of this possible threat, the dominance of institutions of the postwar period: The United Nations, The World Bank, The International Monetary Fund,
The General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade, reflect the values of American central
decision makers. The United States had used its material resources and prestige to
nurture and sustain these institutions.12
1. International Regimes
While everyone agrees that International Regimes exist; defining at what point
one does or does not exist is quite problematic. Interest based theories like
neoliberalism and rationalism define the existence of regimes differently than the
cognitive theories. There is however a generally accepted definition known as the
consensus definition. This section is devoted to attempting to explain what constitutes
an International Regime with regards to different theories on regimes and how the
theories differ from each other on a few key points as to how to define the presence of a
regime. The consensus definition was written by Stephen Krasner. Krasners consensus
definition states that an international regime is:
Implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules, and decision-making
procedures around which actors expectations converge in a given area
10Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell University
Press, 1983.7.11
Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell University
Press, 1983.3.12
Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell University
Press, 1983.8.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
7/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
7
of international relations. Principles are beliefs of fact, causation and
rectitude. Norms are standards of behavior defined in terms of rights
and obligations, rules are specific prescriptions or proscriptions for
action. Decision-making procedures are prevailing practices for making
and implementing collective choice.
From this definition, it is important to note that International Regimes are not physical
entities but rather ideas that provoke reactions from actors13
. This is not to say that
organizations and regimes are completely separate. Many organizations create regimes
by making norms, rules, etc. Regimes however, unlike organizations, dont have the
ability to act14
As previously said, the States interest based on theories defines regimes in
different ways than the cognitive theories. Cognitive theories focus on regimes in a
more sociological sense15. This means that regimes are observed through the way in
which people or actors react to the norms, rules and other aspects. In the interest based
theories regimes are summed up by the games theory models. The battle of the sexes
defines how rationalism sees regimes where as neoliberals believes that regimes are
meant to solve the prisoners dilemma.
Unfortunately none of these definitions are perfect which has caused dissentagainst regime theory. An example of this is the idea put forth by Susan Strange, who
claims that because of the vague description of regimes that the study of them is
doomed to failure16
. Susan Strange describes the definition of regimes as wooly and
imprecise. The lack of consensus has also led to the many different theories which
many believe can be used as an amalgamation to come to a closer understanding of
international regimes.
2.1 Security Regimes
13Brahm, Eric. International Regimes. . September 2005.
14Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179
15Brahm, Eric. International Regimes. . September 2005.
16Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
8/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
8
As this paper has made clear, defining when a regime does or does not exist can
confound even the most intuitive or researchers. It is generally well established that you
can only observe regimes indirectly through the effects that they have on actors. By
this, observing regimes could be made easier if there is an organization that can seen,
and which has been formed to establish rules, norms, and principles on an international
playing field. This section is devoted to viewing regimes through organizations whose
principle functions are International Security. The first organization discussed will be
the security regime of the Iroquois League which existed in upstate New York, prior to
European interactions. After this the North Atlantic Treaty Organization will be
discussed. Finally the United Nations Security Council and how it has formed a
security regime. Brief attention will also be given to the Association of Southeast AsianNations.
One concrete example of Security Regimes is the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations that was created in august 1967 to promote peace and stability in the
region. In addition, the association creates links of cooperation and collaboration based
in mutual respect of all the members, protecting the sovereignty, the right of non-
interference, promoting the peaceful settlements of disputes and the condemnation of
the use of force as a tool of effective cooperation.17
Iroquois League
The Iroquois League is arguably one of the best examples of a security regime as it
existed from around the year 1450 C.E to 1777 C.E when it was peacefully dissolved18
.
The Iroquois League was a group of originally five and then later six Native American
nations who had expensive conflicts with each other. Due to the high cost of the
conflicts, those five nations decided to join together to form a security regime and
follow norms, rules, and procedures in hopes that the other members would follow as
well19
. The Iroquois League followed a rule which they called the Great Law. This law
was based on the myth of a man who called for peace, the legend of the leaders
17http://www.aseansec.org/about_ASEAN.html18Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations. June
22 1994.
19Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations. June
22 1994.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
9/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
9
conversion to peace, and the principles of the league20
. The main principle of the
Iroquois League was stated as so:
I Dekanwidah, and the Union Lords now uproot the tallest pine tree
and in the cavity thereby made we cast all weapons of war We burry
them from sight and we plant again the tree. Thus shall the Great Peace
be established and hostilities shall no longer be known between the Five
Nations but peace to the United People.
Every five years the members of these nations would reconvene to see if they were all
of the same opinion about this matter and if they were the regime would stay in place21
.
The Iroquois Leagues peace lasted until as stated 1777 C.E when the Revolutionarywar in North America caused division amongst the nations on whether they should join
with the 13 colonies or Great Britain. As they could not reach a consensus the league
was peacefully abolished22.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is another example of an
organization which has created as a Security Regime. More specifically, by the
neoliberal standards, NATO would be a forum which helps nations to overcome the
prisoners dilemma. This is because the principle purpose of NATO is to provide a
forum in which members can discuss security matters. NATO has established manyrules, norms, and principles which are stated in the North Atlantic Treaty which was
made in 194923. This includes promoting peace as stated in the UN charter and the
promotion of stability. Relating to security, members of NATO agree to aid each other
for collective defense which is an important example of cooperation, and to consult with
each other on matters of security as well. An example of the security regime at work
would be after the terrorist attacks to the World Trade Center in New York (9/11)
which, due to article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, was considered an attack to all
20Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations. June
22 1994.
21Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations. June
22 1994.
22Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations. June
22 1994.
23
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
10/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
10
members. This is why NATO forces have been deployed in Afghanistan24
. Had the
nations not abided by this treaty the regime would have been weakened.
Finally the United Nations Security Council; this is an organization which
has created a very important security regime within the international system. The
United Nations Security Council has variable functions. Two of these are the
maintenance of international peace and security. NATO, under article 5 of the North
Atlantic Treaty must actually report to the Security Council in the event of an attack so
that the Security Council can act to maintain international peace and security25
. The
Security Council as an organization has created many norms, rules and principles in the
form of resolutions which other states are expected to respect due to the fact they are
legally binding. This is how the United Nations Security Council is a regime. If nations
did not respond to these resolutions made by the Security Council repeatedly, the
security regime would cease to exist, regardless of whether the Security Council did or
did not26
.
3. VARIABLES
Regimes could be conceived of as intervening variables between basic causal
factors and related outcomes and behavior becomes relevant27
. To understand the
conditions that allow the creation of regimes is necessary explain the followingvariables:
Egoistic Self Interest: The party (state) tries to maximize its own utility
without taking in consideration the other. The party is only concerned about the
other if the others actions could have adverse effects on said party only is
concerned about the other if this could prejudice the utility or interest of the
other .
Power: The most developed countries must believe that others share the same
values. Therefore, the achievement of common goals and joining action will be
optima.
24
25
26Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179
27Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
11/26
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
12/26
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
13/26
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
14/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
14
actors. Each of these three has varying degrees and theories within themselves as well.
There is the Cognitive theory of regimes which is more focused on studying regimes
through how norms are perceived. Then there are the Rationalist theories on regimes,
which picture regimes as less robust than the Neoliberal theories. Finally the Neoliberal
theories on regimes which in recent years have become the most used way of
researching International Relations35
. There is also the constructivist view which will
be explained briefly.
7.1. Cognitive Regimes
Cognitive theories of regimes tend to revolve around the perception of norms as
opposed to compliance to them. This would be in contrast to the Behavioralist theory ofregimes which is based on empirical evidence with regards to the following of norms.
36
In this theory, State actors adhere to norms and regulations are the basis to weather a
regime exists or not. If an actor repeatedly does not follow norms or regulations the
regime would be said not to exist37
. It is important to note that perfect adherence is not
required but non-adherence detracts from the robustness of the regime38
. The empirical
evidence in this example being that the regime can only be observed through the actions
of the actor. In the cognitive theories of regimes adherence or non-adherence is not
needed to observe the regime but rather how the adherence or non-adherence is
perceived by actors39. Also societal perceptions of adherence can be telling of when
regimes exist.
7.2.Rationalist Regimes
Rationalist theories tend to describe regimes as being less impactful than the
other theories on regimes. In the rationalist theories, actors are self-interested and are
only concerned with maximizing their own gains40
. With this it is important to say that
35Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 183. 36
Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 180.
37Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 181
38Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 181.
39Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 181 .
40Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
15/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
15
in rationalist theories everything is considered to be zero sum41
. This means that for one
actor to gain something another must lose something to maintain equilibrium. This is
also why actors in realist theories are said to be envious of other actors42. Power is
derived from material forces within the rationalist theory43
. Unlike the neoliberal
theories, the rationalist theories believe that a regime can only have influence if it is
created by a hegemony that has a monopoly on the power. In rationalist theories if this
power is evened out the regime, it will lose its influence44
. While both neoliberal and
rationalist theories state that regimes are important they are somewhat marginalized in
the rationalist theory45
. The rationalist theory argues that although states want to work
together they will fail because of their self-interest. This can best be described by the
battle of the sexes model46
. The rationalist theory also believes in relative gains asopposed to absolute gains. This means that actors follow zero sum policies so any
interaction between them maintains the equilibrium47
. Due to this, actors do not wish to
engage in relations if the other actor will benefit because this benefit comes at the others
loss.
7-3.Neoliberal Regimes
The Neoliberal Theories of regimes which are also known as interest-based
theories believe that an actors power is described by their ability to reach agreements48
.
This is in contrast to the definition of power stated above for rationalist theories. Due to
this idea of power, Neoliberal theories value regimes abilities to make forums where
nations can get together to achieve common interests49. The prisoners dilemma is
41Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
42Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 196.
43Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
44Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 197
45Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 196.
46Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
47Rouseau, David L. Relative and Absolute Gains: Beliefs and Behavior in International Politics.
University of Pennsylvania. 1 July (1999) p.3.48
Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
49Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 184.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
16/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
16
thusly very important in neoliberal theories50
. This is because each state has its own
interests at heart and in the case of the prisoners dilemma, each state will testify against
the other with the hope that they will get the minimal punishment. This is an example
of absolute gains because the state takes into account all aspects and chooses the option
that will benefit it the most. They also do this with the knowledge that the other state
has its own interest at heart and cannot be trusted; because of this each will get the five
year sentence as they were unable to work for the common good with each other51
.
Another important aspect about neoliberal theories is that like rationalist theories, actors
are thought to act with self interest52
. It is important to note however that unlike the
rationalist theories the neoliberal theories are not zero sum. Therefore in neoliberal
theories something which is advantageous to an actor does not necessarily have to be adisadvantage to another actor. This is why as opposed to the rationalist theories;
neoliberal theories believe that actors are not envious of each other53
in this sense;
actors in neoliberal theories can be considered as autonomous54
. Neoliberal theories use
absolute gains in contrast to the rationalist theories which use the relative gains model.
The neoliberal theories using the nonzero sum policy believe that all actors can benefit
from interactions55.
The Constructivist Theory on International Regimes focuses more on actors
personal views as opposed to general definitions given to fit all actors. An example ofthis is the constructivist idea of power. In constructivism, power is described as coming
from the states interests and being more social56
. The states interests in constructivist
theory are also socially defined and vary from actor to actor. Constructivism also states
that an actors interests are dynamic57
. This is in contrast to the neoliberal and
50Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
51Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 185.
52Ibid s.f. 184.
53Ibids.f. 196.
54Ibid s.f. 184.
55Rouseau, David L. Relative and Absolute Gains: Beliefs and Behavior in International Politics.
University of Pennsylvania. 1 July (1999) p.3.56
Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
57Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
17/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
17
rationalist theories which believe that interests are more static58
. This does, however,
mean that both the rationalist definition and the neoliberal definition could fit within the
constructivists if an actors interest conformed to saiddefinitions.
8. International Cooperation and International Coordination
Another very important topic relating to regimes theory is how actors choose to
work together. In the two interests based theories these interactions are divided into the
topics of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration. Liberalist theories believe that
actors are capable of cooperation as opposed to rationalist theories which do not. In
examples of coordination, however, both rationalists and liberalist agree to its
usefulness on some level.
In the liberalist theory on regimes theory, cooperation is viewed as a favorable
aspect. The problem with cooperation is the games theory model of the single-play
prisoners dilemma.59
This is because all actors are considered to be self interested.
This means that they cannot be trusted to cooperate even if the outcome is potentially
better.60Liberalism stresses that using forums created by international regimes makes
cooperation possible. This is because it allows the actor to have knowledge of how the
other actor will act in a situation. It also mitigates the advantages of cheating the other
actor which in essence causes more cooperation
61
. Liberalist theories also believe thatregimes help in fostering cooperation because the norms, rules, principles, and decision
making procedure (if broken) can affect an actor in other issues outside of the one in
which the abuse was inflicted. Also because liberalist views are not zero sum
cooperation does not have to result in a loss to either participant. In rationalist theories,
it is believed that actors would like to cooperate with one another but since they are self
interested they will fail. This is the classic battle of the sexes model. Also because of
58Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 184.
59 Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 185
60Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 185.
Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 186.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
18/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
18
the realist use of the zero sum idea cooperation can be damaging to an actor and
therefore it is not advantageous. An example of international cooperation could be the
Montreal protocol. In this protocol nations agreed to phase out the use of ozone
depleting chemicals within a set amount of time.62
Coordination between actors is accepted by both liberalist and realist theories
because it is thought to be self enforcing63. This is because in most cases, if an actor
chooses not to coordinate with other actors they can be at a disadvantage if the thing
they are coordinating on is of any significant importance. This was a problem which
the Confederacy had during the United States civil war. As opposed to the Union, the
Confederacy did not coordinate on the sizes of railroad tracks which led to problems
when trying to move things over great distances. Another example would be how many
countries share the same traffic signals red for stop and green for go. If however, the
topic is not seen as important, coordination will not be seen as necessary64
In contrast to coordination, collaboration needs to be enforced in some manner
for actors to adhere to it65
. This is because collaboration falls under the category of the
prisoners dilemma. This means that the other actors do not have an inward reason to
comply with the others so they will do what is in their own interest 66. Due to
collaboration, regimes need transparency so that actors can be reassured about trusting
one another
9. Game Theory
In regimes theory it is very important to know how the Game Theory affects the
choices of different actors in the international playing field. Game theory is used to
illustrate different aspects of actors and to anticipate how they will act in given
situations with set choices. Game theory does this through the use of thought
experiments67
such as the prisoners dilemma and the battle of the sexes. Game theory
62www.ciesin.org/TG/PI/POLICY/montpro.html63
Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 188.
64Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 188.
65Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 188.
66Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 188.
67A thought experiment is a simplified way of explaining a complex question through the use of a story
or situation-
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
19/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
19
also pertains to zero sum and non-zero sum theories which different theories on regimes
use.
It is important to understand the basics of zero sum and nonzero sum ideas. In a
zero sum situation, equilibrium must be maintained so a gain by one is a loss by
another68
. In a nonzero sum situation both parties are able to act independently without
affecting the other69.
The prisoners dilemma is an example of a single-play game70
. The basic
premise of the prisonersdilemma; which was first put into these contexts by Albert W.
Tucker; is that there are two people who have been arrested and are separated from each
other. The police dont have enough evidence to convict them so they go to each onewith the same offer. Each prisoner has the option of either testifying against the other
prisoner or remaining silent. If both of the prisoners remain silent they each will receive
a six month sentence. If one testifies and the other remains silent the one who testified
is allowed to go free and the one who remained silent must spend the next ten years in
jail. If both of the prisoners testify against each other then they will both receive a five
year sentence. If the prisoner is self interested then the obvious choice is to testify
against the other prisoner because regardless of the others choice you will receive the
better option or at least and equal one. Assuming that the other prisoner is self
interested as well makes testifying the best option to take if there can be no mediation
between the two.
The battle of the sexes is another game theory model by Richard Little. This
model states that
The scenario of this game envisages a couple who have just fallen in
love and decide to go on holiday together. The problem is that one
wants to go hiking together in the mountains and the other wants to visit
art galleries and museums in the city. But both prefer to be with theirpartner than to go on holiday alone.
68Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University 69
Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University 70
Rouseau, David L. Relative and Absolute Gains: Beliefs and Behavior in International Politics.
University of Pennsylvania. 1 July (1999) p.4.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
20/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
20
The premise of this is that even though the couple wants to be together, because of their
self interests they will fail to cooperate which creates a lose-lose situation for the both
of the involved parties71.
10.. COMUNICATION REGIMES.
I. THE MASS MEDIA DECLARATION:(Kaarle Nordenstreng)
The declaration of the UNESCO regarding the regulation of mass comunication
is undoubtly a good example of the matter of Regimes in the internatinal community.
The declaration established on 28th
november of 1978 was created mainly to address the
inequality existence in the world specially for those whose have not a priviliged
conditions of life, and, therefore, they can have the same opportunities to be part of the
society that has contact with mass media communition. Besides, the UNESCO
addressed the necessity to make possible the free circulation of information and
images as part of the values required for the education, peace and development of the
most needed. In fact, according to the Human Rights Declaration adopted in 1948 by
the member states of the UN, in article 19 stipulates that all human beings have the right
to express themselve according to their personal beliefs and they capable of research,
exchange ideas and knowledge as part of their inherent freedom.72
The intend of the
declaration is the comprehension of each other throught knowledge and information.The spreed of communication among regions, regarding the geographical situations in
the search for respect without taking in consideration race, personal belifs and social
conditions.
11. ECONOMIC REGIMES
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.
The international Monetary Found was created in 1944 as part of the Bretton
Woods agreement. 44 countries signed the agreement that had as purpose the
maitainance of exchange rates for international free trade, especially after the end of the
71Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University 72
www.portal.unesco.org.
http://www.portal.unesco.org/http://www.portal.unesco.org/8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
21/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
21
WWII. The avoidance of a crisis such as The Great Depresion and the estimulation of
economies of the devastated countries was the main duty of these Regime.73
However,
the role of this institutions was also the assistance of Less Development Countries
giving loans in retribution of domestic policy changes. This regime scope was the
regulation of maladjustments in the balance of payments to control any further crisis.
The economic Regimes look for the development of the countries as well as the
estability in their domestic politics for the maintance of the status quo.
12. THE IMPLICATIONS OF REGIMES
12.1. The importance of Regimes
The foundation of Regimes responds to the need to explain the possibility,
conditions and consequences of international governance further than anarchy and short
of supranational government in a given issue area.74
Governance with or without
government is distinguished from anarchy by the fact that states and other international
actors recognized the existence of obligations and feels compelled for specific reasons
to honor them by their behavior. As a result, International Regimes are more specialized
arrangements that affect to self defined activities. Indeed, Regimes are the platform for
the discussion of warning issues that threat the international community as well the
binding for further cooperation and collaboration among states.
12.2Criticism of the theory
While Regimes Theory is widely accepted, it has faced many criticisms from
people who dont believe it is the best way to study this topic area within international
studies. In this section, the focal point will first be criticisms of the regime theory which
have been postulated. The second section will focus on the defense of regime theory in
the face of such criticisms.
One of the main problems facing regime theory is the definition of regime it self.
As illustrated previously in this paper, regimes can prove difficult to define and vary
greatly. This has lead to dissent among some to regimes theory. One such dissenter is
73Vreeland, Raymond. IMF and Economic Development. 9.
74Rittberger Volker, Mayer Peter. Regimes Theory and International Relations. Oxford University Press,
s.f.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
22/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
22
Susan Strange. Susan Strange has stated that the current definitions of regimes are too
expansive and try to cover too many aspects leaving the definition vague. Due to this
Susan Strange has declared that the definitions of regimes are wooly75. Strange
stipulates that due to the vagueness of the definitions of regimes, regimes theory will
not persist76
.
Although Susan Strange brings up a valid point in the difficulty of defining
regimes; is it really enough to scrap the theory in hopes of a better alternative? Many
would disagree. While the definition of a regime might not be precise there is as stated
earlier a consensus definition which provides a relatively good explanation of regimes77
.
Many would also contend that the multiple definitions of regimes with the varying
theories can be used to create a stronger theory than any individual one 78
12.3. States, interstates and civil society relations
The specific object of Regime analysis is the core of the intertwined relations
among regimes and the states actors. The states are the specific issue areas where the
normative and legalization lay upon with a certain norms, rules and procedures that
allow the establishment of social order by self-regulation in International Relations. The
scopes of actors involved in Regimes are quite diverse including in the activities:
private entities, multinational corporations, banks, fishing companies, NGOS, civilsociety and other79. Nonetheless, the rules and norms are universal principles that are
requirements for all the members that are part of the Regime that is: primary concern
about the creation of obligations that do not respond to class-based forms.
13. THE REFORM OF THE REGIME INSTITUTIONS
75Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179.
76Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179.
77Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 179.
78Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f. 177..
79Rittberger Volker, Mayer Peter. Regimes Theory and International Relations. Oxford University Press,
s.f.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
23/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
23
13.1. Critics.
The Regime critics considered that they are served and managed by an organizationbody recognized with a particular function in mind; while others are served by an
organization established for another purposes. In the previous case, the institutional
setting which a regime was formed often is different from the setting in which it is
implemented.80In addition, the following problems are to be considered:
13.2. Problems of Coordination: Even institutions are characterized by perfect
harmony of interest coordination behavior; which may be required to guarantee
collective best possible outcomes. However coordination could face the next troubles:
Incompatibility of individual choices
Different routes that lead into collective optimum
Compatibility taken for granted without consensus
13.3Problems of Incongruity: Post benefit calculations of an individual actor are
systematically based on the cost of opportunities of the benefits of a particular course of
actions. The common welfare is more needed that the own welfare.81
14. CONCLUSION.
Regimes emerge as the requirement of the international community. The
devastation left by the lack of norms, rules, procedures and decision making which help
us to achieve common goals; such as international collective security and peace, lead
the creation of regimes that help us to avoid other catastrophes like WWI and WWII.
Even when regimes at first instance where established with the basic principle to deter
any act of threat in the international community, the role of regimes have been evolving
within time. Nowadays, there are multiple scopes and targets that regimes cover. In
addition, regimes have the power of create custom and habits needed to create
precedents in the regulation of international law Yet, the critics of regime considered
that unidirectional actions could be hidden in regimes for the hegemony, the history has
80Miles, Edward. Environmental Regime Efectiveness: Confronting Theory with evidence.s.f. 17
81Miles, Edward. Environmental Regime Efectiveness: Confronting Theory with evidence.s.f. 18
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
24/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
24
prove that in the majority of cases, regime has been an important tool to achieve human
rights, economic trade preferences, basic freedoms and security needed to subsist in this
anarchical world.
The game theory models are quite possibly the most easy to understand part of
regimes theory. This is because they use thought experiments which make things far
more clear than the often esoterically verbose prattling of the people who have written
on this topic. The simplifications within these short stories illuminate some of the most
complex ideas; including how actors react in given situations depending on theories
with situations which the reader can relate to. It was also interesting to see how there
could be two so very different ideas about the same theory. By this I mean the zero sum
and nonzero sum ideas. This is why it seems like each theory can have its usefulness in
specific situations. For example, a war would obviously be zero sum where as trade
could potentially be nonzero sum with both actors benefitting from the interaction.
Relating to the multiple theories of regimes, the lack of a clear definition is
certainly hurting the arguments for the study. The wooliness of this topic makes it
hard to understand exactly what a regime is. I found it very interesting however those
regimes, for the most part, can only be observed indirectly much like a black hole which
essentially appears as a void but can be viewed by its effects on other objects in space.
Each definition of regimes has something to offer in different situations though. For
example if you were in a prisoners dilemma it would make sense to go with rationalist
thoughts and choose the most effective means of self maintenance if you do not know
how the other person is going to act. However if there is the possibility of cooperation
then you would obviously take it going by the liberalist view. The definitions of power
also seem applicable in different situations. Certainly being able to reach agreements
can be perceived as power in some cases but the material aspect of power has its uses as
well. The cognitive theory of regimes to me, it seems the most scientific but even then
it seems to border on the line of psychology which is not as concrete as many otherforms of science.
International regimes suffer from the same wooliness as all things in the regime
theory. This makes it hard to understand them but in reality regimes are such an
abstract concept that it would be nearly impossible to derive when one truly exists or
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
25/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
25
not. It would be interesting to see exactly where they come from, especially the ones
that are without organizations and seem to be more caused by human nature than
anything.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger. Theories of International Regimes. s.f.
12.
Brahm, Eric. International Regimes. . September 2005.
Cees J. Hamelink, Olga Linn,James Dermot Halloran. Mass Communication Research. s.f. 4.
Crawford, Neta C. A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois
nations. June 22 1994.
Grainca, Valdrin. Great Powers Behavior Towards International Regimes. Linkpin University
Hedley, Bull. Anarchical Society. Columbia University Press, 1977.
Keohane, Robert. Neoliberal Institutions: A perspective on World Politics. s.f.
Krasner, Stephen. International Regimes. s.f. 2.
Krasner, Stephen. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences. New York: Cornell
University Press, 1983. 2.
Miles, Edward. Environmental Regime Efectiveness: Confronting Theory with evidence. s.f.
45.
NATO homepage .
Rittberger Volker, Mayer Peter. Regimes Theory and International Relations. Oxford University
Press, s.f.
Rouseau, David L. Relative and Absolute Gains: Beliefs and Behavior in International Politics.
University of Pennsylvania. 1 July (1999)
vreeland, Raymond. IMF and Economic Development. 9.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. s.f. 19.
Young, R Oran. International Cooperation: Bulding Regimes for Natural Resources. s.f. 11.
8/10/2019 Essay Intl. Regimes Final Draft
26/26
1 de octubre de 2009
[INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND REGIMES
THEORIES.]
26