FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS 1322 N Marguerite Rd ......608 State St. South Kirkland, WA 98033 [email protected] +1.800.571.FAIR FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS 1322 N Marguerite Rd, Spokane

608 State St. South Kirkland, WA 98033

www.faira.com

[email protected] +1.800.571.FAIR

FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS

1322 N Marguerite Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99212

Thank you for your interest in this Faira Certified home. We have coordinated the efforts of certified and licensed inspection and title professionals to create the Faira Transparency Reports for this home. The Faira Transparency Reports are a detailed portfolio of information that is prepared on behalf of buyers in preparation for making an informed offer on the property.

You may view more detailed information for this home and can make an offer at

http://www.faira.com/listings/13424 All of the information in the Faira Transparency Reports was gathered and compiled without any bias or influence from the seller(s). In fact, these reports are materially identical had you as the buyer(s) ordered the same professionals to perform the evaluations on the same date. Nevertheless, Faira takes no obligation of the reports being complete or accurate. The buyers are recommended to conduct their own due-diligence to their satisfaction. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like more information. We’re happy you’ve chosen a Faira Certified home and look forward to the opportunity of working with you! The Faira Team

http://www.faira.com/listings/10483

Each oice is independently owned and operated. | ©2013 The HomeTeam Inspection Service, Inc. All rights reserved.

homE inspEction rEport

Home. Safe. Home.

ACCURATE

TRUSTED

FAST

WHAT IS A HOME INSPECTION?The purpose of a home inspection is to visually examine

the readily accessible systems and components of the home.

The inspectors are not required to move personal property,

materials or any other objects that may impede access or limit

visibility. Items that are unsafe or not functioning, in the opinion

of the inspector, will be described in accordance with the

standards of practice by which inspectors abide.

WHAT DOES THIS REPORT MEAN TO YOU? This inspection report is not intended as a guarantee, warranty

or an insurance policy. Because your home is one of the largest

investments you will ever make, use the information provided in

this report and discuss the indings with your real estate agent

and family to understand the current condition of the home.

OUR INSPECTIONS EXCEED THE HIGHEST INDUSTRY STANDARDS.Because we use a team of inspectors, each an expert in his or

her ield, our inspections are performed with greater eiciency

and more expertise and therefore exceed the highest industry

standards. We are pleased to provide this detailed report as a

service to you, our client.

WE BELIEVE IN YOUR DREAM OF HOME OWNERSHIP.We want to help you get into your dream home. Therefore,

we take great pride in assisting you with this decision making

process. This is certainly a major achievement in your life. We are

happy to be part of this important occasion and we appreciate

the opportunity to help you realize your dream.

WE EXCEED YOUR EXPECTATIONS.Buying your new home is a major decision. Much hinges on the

current condition of the home you have chosen. That is why we

have developed the HomeTeam Inspection Report. Backed by

HomeTeam’s experience with hundreds of thousands of home

inspections over the years, the report in your hand has been

uniquely designed to meet and exceed the expectations of

today’s homebuyers. We are proud to deliver this high-quality

document for your peace of mind. If you have any questions

while reviewing this report, please contact us immediately.

Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to serve you.

SPOKANE, WA

509.981.9664hometeam.com/[email protected]

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Brian Abbott

1322 N Marguerite Rd

Spokane Valley WA, 99212

Dear Brian,

On 12/5/2018 HomeTeam Inspection Service made a visual inspection of the property referenced above. Enclosedplease find a written, narrative report of our findings in accordance with the terms of our Home Inspection Agreement.Although maintenance items may have been addressed verbally at the time of the inspection, they may not be includedin the enclosed report.

I trust the enclosed information is helpful and I hope you enjoy every aspect of your new home. If I can be of anyassistance, please feel free to call me at the above telephone number.

Sincerely,

Randy and Rob Jorgenson

HomeTeam Inspection Service

Home Inspector 735 & 1665

Page 1 of 37

PREFACE:

This report is intended for the sole, confidential, and exclusive use and benefit of the Client(s) under a written HomeTeam InspectionAgreement. This report is not intended for the benefit of, and may not be relied upon by, any other party. The disclosure ordistribution of this report to the current owner(s) of the property inspected or to any real estate agent will not make those personsintended beneficiaries of this report. The HomeTeam Inspection Service has no liability to any party (other than the HomeTeam clientnamed above, for whom this report was expressly prepared) for any loss, damage or expense (including, without limitation, attorneyfees) arising from any claim relating to this report.

A home inspection is intended to assist in evaluation of the overall condition of the dwelling. The inspection is based on observationof the visible and apparent condition of the structure and its components on the date of the inspection. We will not render an opinionas to the condition of any systems or components of the structure that are concealed by walls, floors, drywall, paneling, suspendedceiling tiles, insulation, carpeting, furniture or any other items stored in or on the property at the time of the inspection.

The results of this home inspection are not intended to make any representation regarding the presence or absence of latent orconcealed defects that are not reasonably ascertainable in a competently performed home inspection. No warranty or guaranty isexpressed or implied.

If the person conducting your home inspection is not a licensed structural engineer or other professional whose license authorizesthe rendering of an opinion as to the structural integrity of a building or its other component parts, you may be advised to seekprofessional opinion as to any defects or concerns mentioned in the report. If the age, condition or operation of any system, structureor component of the property is of a concern to you, it is recommended that a specialist in the respective field be consulted for amore technically exhaustive evaluation.

This home inspection report is not to be construed as an appraisal and may not be used as such for any purpose.

This inspection report includes a description of any material defects (*) noted during the inspection, along with any recommendationthat certain experts be retained to determine the extent of the defects and any corrective action that should be taken. Any materialdefect that poses an unreasonable risk to people on the property will be conspicuously defined as such. Any recommendations madeto consult with other specialists for further evaluation as a result of our findings should be complete prior to the conclusion of theinspection contingency period.The Client warrants they will read the entire Inspection Report when received and shall promptlycontact HomeTeam regarding any questions or concerns the Client may have regarding the inspection or the Inspection Report.

* Material Defect: A problem with a residential real property or any portion of it that would have a significant adverse impact on thevalue of the property or that involves an unreasonable risk to the people on the property. The fact that a structural element, system orsubsystem is near, at or beyond the end of the normal useful life of such a structural element, system or subsystem is not by itself amaterial defect.

The majority of home inspections are performed on pre-existing structures. The age of these structures vary from just a few years toover 99 years old. Building techniques have changed dramatically over the years. These changes are what bring character to theneighborhoods, and affect a buyer's decision to purchase one home over another. Therefore, the age and method of construction willaffect the individual character of a home.

We will not determine the cause of any condition or deficiency, determine future conditions that may occur including the failure ofsystems and components or consequential damage or components or determine the operating costs of systems or components.

It is not uncommon to observe cracks or for cracks to occur in concrete slabs or exterior and interior walls. Cracks may be caused bycuring of building materials, temperature variations and soil movement such as: settlement, uneven moisture content in the soil,shock waves, vibrations, etc. While cracks may not necessarily affect the structural integrity of a building, cracks should be monitoredso that appropriate maintenance can be performed if movement continues at an abnormal rate. Proper foundation maintenance iskey to the prevention of initial cracks or cracks enlarging. This includes, but not limited to proper watering, foundation drainage andremoval of vegetation growth near the foundation.

File Number: 5849

Address of Inspection: 1322 N Marguerite Rd

Page 2 of 37

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

Throughout this report, the terms "right" and "left" are used to describe the home as viewed from the street.

A system or component has a material defect if it is either unsafe or not functioning and cannot be replaced or renderedsafe or functional for less than $1,000. The HomeTeam inspects for evidence of structural failure and safety concernsonly. The cosmetic condition of the paint, wall covering, carpeting, window coverings, etc., are not addressed.

Routine maintenance and safety items are not within the scope of this inspection unless they otherwise constitutemajor, visually observable defects. Although some maintenance and/or safety items may be disclosed, this report doesnot include all maintenance or safety items, and should not be relied upon for such items.

All conditions are reported as they existed at the time of the inspection.

The approximate temperature at the time of the inspection was 30 to 35 degrees Fahrenheit, and the weather waspartly clear. The seller was present at the time of the inspection. The utilities were on at the time of the inspection. Theage of the home, as reported by the MLS sheet was said to be 80 years old.

• NOTE: Vintage Home Prior to 1950Vintage Homes-(Homes build prior to 1950) Character homes have inherent defects because they werebuilt without the benefit of the standardized building codes. You must keep in mind that the defects notedthroughout this report are typical. Such dwellings because of normal wear and tear throughout the years.Often, maintenance repairs are ongoing and done based on your budget. If you tried to repair or improveall at once, costs could become high to the point where it is not practical or affordable to you at this timeRepairs or improvements which you would like to repair in the immediate future or have been advised to do,should be quoted prior to purchase by qualified contractors for costs and methods of repair.

• NOTE: Lead Based Paint Before 1978It has been determined that this home was built before 1978 and therefore stands a high risk of having leadbased paint present. Not only is lead not good for your health, under the EPA ruling 40CFR part 745effective April 22nd, 2010, any renovation, remodeling or painting not performed by yourself must be doneby a certified contractor following Lead Safe Practices and this could lead to higher prices than similarcontracts performed on homes that do not have lead based paint. It is recommended that a preliminaryscreening for lead based paint be conducted to determine the likelihood of the presence of lead beforeclosing if this is a concern for you.

The inspected property consisted of a two story wood-framed structure with vinyl siding that was occupied at the time ofthe inspection. There were no material defects on the visual portions of the siding.

File Number: 5849


Page 3 of 37

• Damaged siding was noted on the front. This condition is cosmetic and does not have any affect on the

File Number: 5849


Page 4 of 37

structural integrity of the building. Repairs should be made as desired by a qualified contractor.

• Plant and ivy growth was observed against the home on the front, left and rear sides of the house. It isrecommended that all plant and tree growth be removed atleast 18 inches away from the siding to preventpossible damage including insect infestation.

File Number: 5849


Page 5 of 37

LOT AND GRADE

The home was situated on a level to sloped lot. The general grade around the home appeared to be adequate to directrain water away from the foundation.

WALKWAY AND PORCHES

There was an unpaved and a stone walkway leading to a concrete stoop in the front and on the left side of the home.Surface defects in walkways develop and progress with age and are considered normal as long as they do not create asafety hazard. There were no material defects observed in the walkway or the stoops.

File Number: 5849


Page 6 of 37

• There were cracked and damage done stone tiles observed in the stoop on the front of the home. It isrecommended that these be repaired to prevent trip hazards and help prevent further deterioration.

There was a stone patio located in the back of the home. There were no material defects observed in the patio.

File Number: 5849


Page 7 of 37

• There were cracked, damaged and missing stone tiles noted in the rear patio. It is recommended that allcracks and damaged tiles be repaired to help prevent further cracking, wear and potential trip hazards.

File Number: 5849


Page 8 of 37

DRIVEWAY

There was a gravel driveway on the right side of the home which led to the detached garage. There were uneven areasnoted on the driveway. Surface defects in driveways develop and progress with age and are considered normal as longas they do not create a safety hazard. There were no material defects observed in the driveway.

ROOF

This visual roof inspection is not intended as a warranty or an estimate on the remaining life of the roof. Any roof metal,especially the flashing and valleys, must be kept well painted with a paint specially formulated for the use.

The roof was a gable design covered with asphalt/fiberglass shingles. Observation of the roof surfaces, flashing,skylights and penetrations through the roof was performed from a ladder at the base of the roof.

File Number: 5849


Page 9 of 37

The age of the roof covering, as reported by the visual inspection, was approximately fifteen to twenty years. There wasone layer of asphalt shingles on the roof at the time of the inspection. There was light curling and light surface wearobserved on the roof shingles at the time of the inspection. These conditions indicate the roof shingles were in thesecond half of their useful life.

The wood and vinyl soffit and fascia was inspected and was in fair condition. There were no material defects detectedon the exterior of the roof.

File Number: 5849


Page 10 of 37

• Minor moss growth was observed on the roof. It is typical for roofs, especially facing north to experience mossgrowth. The affected areas can be treated with a moss inhibiting solution.

• There were two damaged shingles observed on the front and rear sides of the roof that should be repaired tohelp prevent water intrusion into the attic space. Contact a qualified contractor for repairs.

There was a partial roof drainage system, which consisted of aluminum gutters, the gutter system appeared to be partlyfunctional but in need of end caps and downspouts at the time of the inspection. Gutters and downspouts shouldreceive routine maintenance to prevent premature failure. There were no material defects observed on the visibleportions of the gutters or downspouts.

• NOTE: There were no gutters or downspouts installed in some areas on the front and rear sides of the home.Gutters and downspouts help facilitate proper drainage of roof water away from the foundation. Although notrequired, it is recommended that gutters and downspouts be installed to direct rain water at least six feet awayfrom the foundation of the home. Consult with a qualified, reputable contractor to install proper roof drainage.

File Number: 5849


Page 11 of 37

• Missing endcaps and downspouts were noted on the front of the home. Gutters and downspouts help facilitateproper drainage of roof water away from the foundation. Consult with a qualified, reputable contractor to installproper roof drainage.

There were two chimneys. Observation of the chimneys exterior was made from the the top of a ladder. There were nomaterial defects observed on the exterior.

• There was no rain hat installed on the left side chimney at the time of inspection. Rain hats help preventpotential moisture intrusion and bird nesting. Contac a qualified contractor for repairs and installation.

File Number: 5849


Page 12 of 37

• There was cracked and missing sections of mortar noted in both of the chimney's brickwork. Repairs shouldbe made to prevent further deterioration. Contact a qualified masonry repair company for service.

• The chimney was overgrown with vines and plant/ivy growth. It is recommended that all plant growth beremoved from contact with the chimney to prevent damage to the chimney stack and potential fire hazards.

File Number: 5849


Page 13 of 37

ATTIC STRUCTURE

• NOTE: There was no access to the attic area at the time of the inspection. As a result, it was not possible toinspect any part of the underside of the roof for signs of leaks, or to determine the type of roof construction.Additionally, it was not possible to determine if insulation was installed in the attic. Special attention was paidto the visible finished ceiling surfaces for evidence of active leaks. There was no evidence of active leaks atthe time of the inspection.

GARAGE

The detached garage was designed for one car with access provided by one overhead-style door. Safety cables wereinstalled inside the door springs... The concrete garage floor was in fair condition. There were no material defectsobserved in the garage.

File Number: 5849


Page 14 of 37

• NOTE: There was limited visibility and or limited access in one or more areas in the garage. The limitedvisibility was due to the garage being cluttered with some stored items and/or shelves at the time of inspection,therefore several areas were unable to be inspected.

• There were minor cracks in the concrete garage floor. It is recommended that all cracks be repaired to helpprevent further cracking and a potential trip hazard.

• Peeling paint was on the siding around the detached garage. All peeling paint should be remedied to helpprevent damage from the elements.

• There was moderate ivy growth noted on the left and rear sides of the detached garage. Ivy growth canpenetrate the exterior siding and cause damage to the building. It is recommended that all plant and ivy growthbe removed away from the home/ garage to prevent conducive conditions to wood destroying organisms.

File Number: 5849


Page 15 of 37

The Chamberlain brand electric garage door opener was tested and found to be functional. The automatic safetyreverse on the garage door was tested and found to be functional. The functionality of remote transmitters, keylessentry or other opening devices is not tested during the home inspection.

FOUNDATION

The foundation was constructed of poured concrete. A single inspection cannot determine whether movement of afoundation has ceased. Any cracks should be monitored regularly. There were no material defects observed on thevisible portions of the foundation.

There were several minor, settlement and stair step observed on the foundation. The cracks were 1/16-inch or less inwidth. These cracks are common and usually insignificant. All buildings experience some settlement. Settlement cracksmost often occur within the first few years after construction as the soil under the structure accommodates itself to theload of the structure. However, the significance of cracks cannot always be judged by a single inspection. All cracksshould be monitored for significant changes in characteristics. Consult with a company specializing in foundation repairif there is a marked change in the size or dimension of a crack.

BASEMENT

The full basement was mostly finished, and contained the following mechanical systems: furnace and water heater.

The basement was dry at the time of the inspection. Because the basement is below grade, there exists a vulnerabilityto moisture penetration after heavy rains. Please note that it is not within the scope of this inspection to determine orpredict the amount or frequency of past or future water intrusion into the basement. HomeTeam will make its best effortin accordance with the ASHI Standards of Practice to determine, based solely on visible conditions at the time of theinspection, whether there is any evidence of ongoing water penetration in the property. You should use all availableresources including the seller disclosure and information from the current owner to determine if any water issues exist. Ifyou require a guarantee of a 100 percent dry basement, consult with a company specializing in water proofing.

File Number: 5849


Page 16 of 37

The concrete basement floor was in satisfactory condition. Minor cracks within any concrete slab are common and aremost often due to shrinkage and settlement. Concrete floors are poured after the structure is built and serve no purposewith regard to structural support.There were no material defects observed in the basement.

The basement stairway was inspected and there were no visual defects or visual safety concerns observed with thesteps, stairways or handrails.

• There was no handrail on the stairs leading to the basement. This can be a safety concern. Local buildingcodes may also require the installation of a handrail.

• There was not a drain present in the basement laundry room.It is recommended that a qualified plumbingcontractor be contacted for installation.

The finished basement area included a mechanical room, laundry room, bathroom, and two bonus rooms. The interiorwalls of the basement were finished; therefore, a complete inspection of the poured concrete foundation was notpossible. There were no material defects observed on the visible portions of the foundation.

File Number: 5849


Page 17 of 37

FLOOR STRUCTURE

The visible floor structure consisted of a tongue and groove subfloor that was insulated, supported by two-inch by ten-inch wood joists spaced sixteen inches on center. There was a concrete wall for load bearing support. There were nomaterial defects observed in the visible portions of the floor structure.

PLUMBING

The visible water supply lines throughout the home were copper and PEX pipe. The water was supplied by a publicwater supply. Water valves are not tested as part of the home inspection. Water valves that have not been operated foran extended period of time often leak after being operated. We would not be able to repair a leaking valve during thehome inspection.

The visible waste lines consisted of cast iron, galvanized & ABS pipe. The functional drainage of the drain waste linesappeared to be adequate at the time of the inspection. The home was connected to a public sewer system. The under-floor drain lines are considered underground utilities and are specifically excluded from the inspection. The lines are notvisible or accessible and their condition cannot be verified during a visible home inspection. Simply running water intofloor drains will not verify the condition of the waste line infrastructure under the home. Consult with a qualified plumberfor a camera inspection of the sewer laterals if there is any concern as to the condition of the waste lines under thehome.

All plumbing fixtures not permanently attached to a household appliance were operated and inspected for visible leaks.Water flow throughout the home was average. Water pressure was tested at an outdoor sillcock and found to be 70 to80 pounds per square inch. This report is not intended to be an exhaustive list of minor plumbing issues. Concealed,latent or intermittent plumbing issues may not be apparent during the testing period. There were no material defectsobserved in the visible portions of the plumbing system.

File Number: 5849


Page 18 of 37

File Number: 5849


Page 19 of 37

WATER METER

The water meter was located in the basement. The main water shutoff valve for the home was located adjacent to thewater service entry point in the basement. Water shutoff valves are visually inspected only. No attempt is made tooperate the main or any other water supply shutoff valves during the inspection. These valves are infrequently used andcould leak after being operated. The only exception to this policy is made when the main water supply valve is off uponarrival at the inspection. Since it is the buyers right to have all utilities operable for the home inspection, we will attemptto turn the main water valve on for the inspection. The HomeTeam is not responsible for leaks caused by operating thevalve.

GAS METER

The gas meter was located on the left exterior wall. The gas supplier for the home based on the identification tag on themeter is Avista. The main gas valve is usually located at the gas meter and requires a wrench to operate. All visible andreadily accessible valves and fittings are tested for leaks using an electronic gas leak detector. No leaks were detected.There was no noticeable odor of gas detected at the time of the inspection.

File Number: 5849


Page 20 of 37

WATER HEATER

There was a 50 gallon capacity, electric water heater located in the basement. The water heater was manufactured byBradford White, model number M250S6DS and serial number CL8504239. Information on the water heater indicatedthat it was manufactured 12 years ago.

A temperature and pressure relief valve (T & P) was present. Because of the lime build-up typical of T & P valves, wedo not test them. An overflow leg was present. It did terminate close to the floor. Your safety depends on the presenceof a T & P valve and an overflow leg terminating close to the floor. The water heater was functional but full seismicrestraints were not present.

• NOTE: Although completely functional at the time of inspection, due to the age of the water heater (being morethen 10 years old), it could be a candidate for replacement sometime in the near future.

• One seismic restraint (earthquake strap) was present. It is recommended that water heaters be doublestrapped with a heavy gauge metal for added stability. The straps should be installed on the upper third andlower third of the tank.

ELECTRIC SERVICE

The overhead electric service wire entered the home on the rear wall. The electric meter was located on the exteriorwall. The service entrance cable consisted of stranded copper rated for 200 amps.

File Number: 5849


Page 21 of 37

• The overhead electric service wire to the home is in contact with tree branches. Tree branches should not bein contact with the electric service wire for safety reasons. It is recommended that the local power company ora qualified contractor be contacted.

The service wire entered a Square D service panel, located on the basement wall with a 200 amp and 120/240 voltrated capacity. The main service disconnect switch was located in the main panel. The branch circuits within the panelwere copper. These branch circuits and the circuit breaker to which they were attached appeared to be appropriatelymatched. The internal components of the service panel, i.e. main lugs, bus bars, etc were in good condition.

File Number: 5849


Page 22 of 37

sub panel

An electric service sub-panel was located in the detached garage, and was manufactured by General Electric. Theservice disconnect switch for this panel was rated at 100 amps. The branch circuits within the panel were copper. Thesebranch circuits and the circuit breaker to which they were attached appeared to be appropriately matched. The visiblewiring consisted primarily of the Romex type and appeared to be in fair condition.

The visible house wiring consisted primarily of the Romex type and appeared to be in good condition. An electricservice grounding system was installed. Service grounding requirements have changed many times over the years. Thegrounding system for a 30-year-old electric service is different from that of a 10-year-old service. The inspection doesnot attempt to verify that the grounding system or any other part of the electric service complies with current codes.

A representative number of installed lighting fixtures, switches, and receptacles located throughout the home weretested. The grounding and polarity of receptacles within six feet of plumbing fixtures, and those attached to ground fault

File Number: 5849


Page 23 of 37

circuit interrupters (GFCI), if present, were also tested. The installation of GFCI protected circuits and/or outlets locatedwithin six feet of water, in unfinished basement areas, garage and the exterior of the home is a commonly acceptedpractice and required by many municipalities. All GFCI receptacles and GFCI circuit breakers should be tested monthly.There were some GFCI protected circuits in the home. The present and tested GFCIs were tested and found to befunctional.

• There were no GFCI outlets in the kichen or the main level bathroom. It is recommended that GFCI outlets arepresent in all kitchen outlets, bathroom outlets, exterior outlets, basement outlets(if applicable),at least onegarage outlet, and any outlet within six feet of a water source.

• One or more three prong type outlets in the home tested as having an open ground. This means that the third

prong, also known as the ground prong is not doing its job. This is usually caused by a missing ground

connection at an electrical device in the circuit. This condition is usually easily correctable by an electrician.

Open grounds in wet locations is considered a safety issue and should be corrected. The outlets that tested

with this condition were marked with a "GREEN" dot for easy identification. Please note that we only test

outlets that are visible and readily accessible at the time of the inspection.

• There were one or more open splices noted throughout the garage and one in the basement. Open splicesconsist of junction boxes with missing cover plates, and wires joined together outside of a junction box. Anopen splice is unprotected joining of electrical wires and should be repaired by a licensed electrician. This is asafety hazard.

File Number: 5849


Page 24 of 37

• Two prong outlets were found in one or more locations in the home. At the time this home was constructed,

two-prong outlets were the standard co9nstruction. Two-pronged outlets were not grounded (open-ground),

and are considered to be outdated by today's standards. In many cases, the outlets can be easily upgraded to

three-prong type. In cases where the outlets cannot be easily upgraded, the installation of GFCI's in kitchens,

baths, garages, basements, outdoor receptacles, and any other high-risk areas, will increase the overall safety

of the electrical system. A qualified electrician should be consulted when working on or updating the electrical

system in your home.

The electrical service appeared to be adequate. Alarms, electronic keypads, remote control devices, landscape lighting,telephone and television, and all electric company equipment were beyond the scope of this inspection. There were nomaterial defects observed in the electrical system.

File Number: 5849


Page 25 of 37

SMOKE ALARMS

There were smoke alarms found in the house. Property maintenance codes vary from area to area. Some municipalitiesrequire smoke alarms in every bedroom, while others only require them on each floor. Check with the local codeenforcement officer for the requirements in your area. For safety reasons, the smoke alarms should be tested uponoccupancy. The batteries (if any) should be replaced with new ones when you move into the house, and tested on amonthly basis thereafter.

• It is recommended that smoke alarms be present inside of each bedroom for safety reasons.

There were no carbon monoxide detectors found in the home. It is now required that homes with gas appliances beequipped with carbon monoxide detectors for safety reasons. The detector will alert the occupants of the home to thepresence of dangerous carbon monoxide caused by a malfunctioning gas appliance.

• There were no carbon monoxide detectors found in the home at the time of inspection. It is recommended thatthere be at least 2 in the home for safety reasons.

WINDOWS, DOORS, WALLS AND CEILINGS

A representative number of accessible windows and doors were operated and found to be functional. The primarywindows were constructed of vinyl, single hung and sliding style, with double pane glass. All exterior doors wereoperated and found to be functional. The exterior door locks should be changed or rekeyed upon occupancy. Possibleproblem areas may not be identified if the windows or doors have been recently painted. There were no major defectsobserved in the windows or doors.

File Number: 5849


Page 26 of 37

The interior wall and ceiling surfaces were finished with drywall and plaster. The interior wall and ceiling structureconsisted of wood framing. Possible problem areas may not be identified if the interior wall and ceiling surfaces havebeen recently painted. There were no material defects observed in the interior walls or ceilings.

FIRST LEVEL

The first level consisted of a mud room, kitchen, dinning room, living room, two bedrooms and a 3/4 bathroom. TheHomeTeam inspects for evidence of structural failure and safety concerns only. The cosmetic condition of the paint, wallcovering, carpeting, window coverings, etc., are not addressed. There were no material defects observed on the firstlevel.

File Number: 5849


Page 27 of 37

SECOND LEVEL

The second level of the home consisted of a bedroom and a den. There were no material defects observed on thesecond level. The second floor stairway was inspected and there were no material defects or visual safety concernsobserved with the steps, stairways or handrails.

File Number: 5849


Page 28 of 37

• There was no handrail on the stairs leading to the second floor. This can be a safety concern. Local buildingcodes may also require the installation of a handrail. A handrail should be installed to prevent potential fall andtrip hazards.

KITCHEN

The visible portions of the kitchen cabinets and counter tops were in serviceable condition. The appliances were turnedon to check operational function only. No consideration is given regarding the age or components that may be worn orotherwise affected by wear and tear or use. No warranty, express or implied, is given for the continued operationalintegrity of the appliances or their components. The kitchen contained the following appliances:

The General Electric electric range was inspected and did appear to be functional. The accuracy of the clock, timersand settings on ovens are not within the scope of this inspection.

File Number: 5849


Page 29 of 37

The Broan range hood was inspected and did appear to be functional. The exhaust capacity is not within the scope ofthis inspection. Cleaning the fan and filter may increase the exhaust capability.

The Frigidaire refrigerator was inspected and did appear to be functional. The temperature setting and ice maker, ifpresent, are not within the scope of the inspection.

The Kitchen Aid dishwasher was tested and did appear to be functional.

File Number: 5849


Page 30 of 37

DRYER CONNECTIONS AND VENT

This note is supplied for informational purposes only, as many clients want to know the type of dryer connectionsavailable to them. A 240 volt outlet for an electric clothes dryer was installed in the laundry area. For safety reasons, noattempt was made to verify that the electrical outlet is properly wired or that power is present. Consult with a qualifiedcontractor if the desired type of connection is not available.

A dryer vent was installed. The visible portion of the dryer vent was inspected and appeared to be functional andadequate for venting to the exterior of the home.

FIREPLACE

There was one fireplace in the home. The visual condition at the time of the inspection was as follows:

A wood burning fireplace was located in the living room. The damper did appear to be functional. There was no visualevidence of creosote buildup in the firebox and/or chimney. There were no cracks observed in the firebox or visibleportions of the chimney.

File Number: 5849


Page 31 of 37

As with all elements of the home inspection, the fireplace inspection is not technically exhaustive. The inspectionprovides a general condition report only. The fireplace inspection does not include the interior of flues or chimneys, draftcharacteristics, chimney or firebox integrity or the adequacy of draft, airflow or makeup air. Consult with a qualified,reputable chimney and fireplace professional for a complete evaluation of the fireplace and chimney. For safetyreasons, a fireplace and the chimney or pipe to which it is vented should be cleaned and re-inspected as there may behidden defects, not fully visible at the time of the inspection. The fireplace was not tested for operation or function.

HEATING SYSTEM

The heating system was inspected by HomeTeam. Periodic preventive maintenance is recommended to keep this unitin good working condition. Annual maintenance of the heating and cooling equipment is essential for safe and efficientperformance, which will maximize the system's useful life. The results of our visual and operational inspection of theheating system is described below:

The home was heated by a Rheem natural gas forced air furnace, serial number FD50302F509906948, model numberRGPH07EAUER which is 19 years old. The unit was located in the basement of the home. It has an approximate netheating capacity of 75,000 BTUH.

Examination of heating systems is mechanically limited since the unit cannot be dismantled to examine all of the interiorcomponents. Without removing the burners to gain complete access, and with the limited viewing area of the heatexchanger, a thorough inspection is not possible. The inspection does not include a heat-loss analysis, heating designor adequacy evaluation, energy efficiency assessment, installation compliance check, chimney flue inspection, draft testor buried fuel tank inspection.

Termination of HVAC condensate lines was raised above the floor drain or drain inlet. The condensate lines weretrapped. HVAC condensate lines must be trapped and not in contact with wet drain inlets to prevent the possiblemigration of bacteria and mold into the air-handling system.

The galvanized steel venting system was adequate to exhaust the spent gases to the exterior of the home and was in

File Number: 5849


Page 32 of 37

good condition. The heating system was found to be functional.

The furnace does not appear to have been recently serviced. It is recommended that the furnace be cleaned andserviced by a qualified contractor upon taking ownership of the property. The furnace should be serviced annually tomaintain safe and efficient operation.

A carbon monoxide detector was inserted into the main plenum just above the heat exchanger. There was nomeasurable level of carbon monoxide detected at the time of the inspection

• There was no recent service record for the HVAC system at the time of inspection. It is recommended that thefurnace be serviced by a licensed HVAC contractor before continued use and on an annual basis thereafter.

There will be normal temperature variations from room to room and level to level, most noticeable between levels.Airflow throughout the house may be balanced by adjusting any dampers in the supply ducts, or by adjusting the supplyregisters. Inspection of air and duct supply system for adequacy, efficiency, capacity or uniformity of the conditioned airto the various parts of the structure is beyond the scope of the home inspection.

The disposable filter should be replaced on a regular basis to maintain the efficiency of the system. The efficiency ratingis not within the scope of this inspection.

The control for the heating and air conditioning system was a 24 volt thermostat located on the dining room wall of thehome. The thermostat was manufactured by Honeywell and was found to be in working order.

CONDUCIVE CONDITIONS TO WDO’S

There was no visible evidence of wood destroying organisms at the time of the inspection. There were conduciveconditions present.

• Vegetation contact with siding of the home is considered a conducive condition to wood destroying organisms

File Number: 5849


Page 33 of 37

and should be remedied.

• Holes and or damage in the siding are considered conducive conditions to wood destroying organisms. It isrecommended that repairs be made.

• Peeling paint is considered a conducive condition to wood destroying organisms and should be remedied.

File Number: 5849


Page 34 of 37

SUMMARY:

This summary provides a simplified overview of the results of the Wednesday, December 5, 2018 inspection at 1322 N

Marguerite Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99212. Be sure to read the full body of the inspection report; it contains much more

detail about the property. Any additional evaluations we'verecommended must be performed prior to the conclusion of

the inspection contingency period.

Maintenance Items

• Plant and ivy growth was observed against the home on the front, left and rear sides of the house. It isrecommended that all plant and tree growth be removed atleast 18 inches away from the siding to preventpossible damage including insect infestation.

• Peeling paint was on the siding around the detached garage. All peeling paint should be remedied to helpprevent damage from the elements.

• Minor moss growth was observed on the roof. It is typical for roofs, especially facing north to experience mossgrowth. The affected areas can be treated with a moss inhibiting solution.

• The chimney was overgrown with vines and plant/ivy growth. It is recommended that all plant growth beremoved from contact with the chimney to prevent damage to the chimney stack and potential fire hazards.

• There was no recent service record for the HVAC system at the time of inspection. It is recommended that thefurnace be serviced by a licensed HVAC contractor before continued use and on an annual basis thereafter.

Minor Defects

• There were cracked and damage done stone tiles observed in the stoop on the front of the home. It isrecommended that these be repaired to prevent trip hazards and help prevent further deterioration.

• There were two damaged shingles observed on the front and rear sides of the roof that should be repaired tohelp prevent water intrusion into the attic space. Contact a qualified contractor for repairs.

• Two prong outlets were found in one or more locations in the home.• Missing endcaps and downspouts were noted on the front of the home. Gutters and downspouts help facilitate

proper drainage of roof water away from the foundation. Consult with a qualified, reputable contractor to installproper roof drainage.

• There were cracked, damaged and missing stone tiles noted in the rear patio. It is recommended that allcracks and damaged tiles be repaired to help prevent further cracking, wear and potential trip hazards.

• There was no rain hat installed on the left side chimney at the time of inspection. Rain hats help preventpotential moisture intrusion and bird nesting. Contac a qualified contractor for repairs and installation.

• There was cracked and missing sections of mortar noted in both of the chimney's brickwork. Repairs shouldbe made to prevent further deterioration. Contact a qualified masonry repair company for service.

• There were minor cracks in the concrete garage floor. It is recommended that all cracks be repaired to helpprevent further cracking and a potential trip hazard.

• Damaged siding was noted on the front. This condition is cosmetic and does not have any affect on thestructural integrity of the building. Repairs should be made as desired by a qualified contractor.

• There was not a drain present in the basement laundry room.It is recommended that a qualified plumbingcontractor be contacted for installation.

• Two prong outlets were found in one or more locations in the home. At the time this home was constructed,

two-prong outlets were the standard co9nstruction. Two-pronged outlets were not grounded (open-ground),

and are considered to be outdated by today's standards. In many cases, the outlets can be easily upgraded to

three-prong type. In cases where the outlets cannot be easily upgraded, the installation of GFCI's in kitchens,

baths, garages, basements, outdoor receptacles, and any other high-risk areas, will increase the overall safety

of the electrical system. A qualified electrician should be consulted when working on or updating the electrical

system in your home.

• There was moderate ivy growth noted on the left and rear sides of the detached garage. Ivy growth canpenetrate the exterior siding and cause damage to the building. It is recommended that all plant and ivy growthbe removed away from the home/ garage to prevent conducive conditions to wood destroying organisms.

Safety Concerns

File Number: 5849


Page 35 of 37

• One or more three prong type outlets in the home tested as having an open ground. This means that the third

prong, also known as the ground prong is not doing its job. This is usually caused by a missing ground

connection at an electrical device in the circuit. This condition is usually easily correctable by an electrician.

Open grounds in wet locations is considered a safety issue and should be corrected. The outlets that tested

with this condition were marked with a "GREEN" dot for easy identification. Please note that we only test

outlets that are visible and readily accessible at the time of the inspection.

• There were no GFCI outlets in the kichen or the main level bathroom. It is recommended that GFCI outlets arepresent in all kitchen outlets, bathroom outlets, exterior outlets, basement outlets(if applicable),at least onegarage outlet, and any outlet within six feet of a water source.

• There were one or more open splices noted throughout the garage and one in the basement. Open splicesconsist of junction boxes with missing cover plates, and wires joined together outside of a junction box. Anopen splice is unprotected joining of electrical wires and should be repaired by a licensed electrician. This is asafety hazard.

• The overhead electric service wire to the home is in contact with tree branches. Tree branches should not bein contact with the electric service wire for safety reasons. It is recommended that the local power company ora qualified contractor be contacted.

• There were no carbon monoxide detectors found in the home at the time of inspection. It is recommended thatthere be at least 2 in the home for safety reasons.

• It is recommended that smoke alarms be present inside of each bedroom for safety reasons.• One seismic restraint (earthquake strap) was present. It is recommended that water heaters be double

strapped with a heavy gauge metal for added stability. The straps should be installed on the upper third andlower third of the tank.

• There was no handrail on the stairs leading to the basement. This can be a safety concern. Local buildingcodes may also require the installation of a handrail.

• There was no handrail on the stairs leading to the second floor. This can be a safety concern. Local buildingcodes may also require the installation of a handrail. A handrail should be installed to prevent potential fall andtrip hazards.

File Number: 5849


Page 36 of 37

REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS REGARDING A PROFESSIONAL HOME INSPECTION:

There may come a time when you discover something wrong with the house, and you may be upset or disappointed with your home inspection. There are somethings we'd like you to keep in mind.

Intermittent or concealed problems: Some problems can only be discovered by living in a house. They cannot be discovered during the few hours of a homeinspection. For example, some shower stalls leak when people are in the shower, but do not leak when you simply turn on the tap. Some roofs and basementsonly leak when specific conditions exist. Some problems will only be discovered when carpets are lifted, furniture is moved or finishes are removed.

No clues: These problems may have existed at the time of the inspection, but there were no clues as to their existence. Our inspections are based on the pastperformance of the house. If there are no clues of a past problem, it is unfair to assume we should foresee a future problem.

We always miss some minor things: Some say we are inconsistent because our reports identify some minor problems but not others. The minor problemsthat are identified were discovered while looking for more significant problems. We note them simply as a courtesy. The intent of the inspection is not to find the$200 problems; it is to find the $1000 problems. These are the things that affect people's decisions to purchase.

Contractor's advice: A common source of dissatisfaction with home inspectors comes from comments made by contractors. Contractors' opinions often differfrom ours. Don't be surprised when three roofers all say the roof needs replacement, when we said that the roof would last a few more years with some minorrepairs.

"Last man in" theory: While our advice represents the most prudent thing to do, many contractors are reluctant to undertake these repairs. This is because ofthe "last man in" theory. The contractor fears that if he is the last person to work on the roof, he will get blamed if the roof leaks, regardless of whether or not theroof leak is his fault. Consequently, he won't want to do a minor repair with high liability, when he could re-roof the entire house for more money and reduce thelikelihood of a callback. This is understandable.

Most recent advice is best: There is more to the "last man in" theory. It suggests that it is human nature for homeowners to believe the last bit of expert advicethey receive, even if it is contrary to previous advice. As home inspectors, we unfortunately find ourselves in the position of "first man in" and consequently it isour advice that is often disbelieved.

Why didn't we see it?: Contractors may say, "I can't believe you had this house inspected, and they didn't find this problem."There are several reasons for these apparent oversights:

• Conditions during inspection: It is difficult for homeowners to remember the circumstances in the house at the time of the inspection.Homeowners seldom remember that it was snowing, there was storage everywhere or that the furnace could not be turned on because the airconditioning was operating, etc. It's impossible for contractors to know what the circumstances were when the inspection was performed.

• This wisdom of hindsight: When the problem manifests itself, it is very easy to have 20/20 hindsight. Anybody can say that the basement iswet when there is 2" of water on the floor. Predicting the problem is a different story.

• A long look; If we spent half an hour under the kitchen sink or 45 minutes disassembling the furnace, we'd find more problems, too.Unfortunately, the inspection would take several days and would cost considerably more.

• We're generalists: We are generalists; we are not specialists. The heating contractor may indeed have more heating expertise than we do.This is because we are expected to have heating expertise and plumbing expertise, structural expertise, electrical expertise, etc.

• An invasive look: Problems often become apparent when carpets or plaster are removed, when fixtures or cabinets are pulled out, and so on.A home inspection is a visual examination. We don't perform invasive or destructive tests.

Not insurance: In conclusion, a home inspection is designed to better your odds. It is not designed to eliminate all risk. For that reason, a home inspectionshould not be considered an insurance policy. The premium that an insurance company would have to charge for a policy with no deductible, no limit and anindefinite policy period would be considerably more than the fee we charge. It would also not include the value added by the inspection.

Reprinted from ASHI Reporter, By Permission of Alan Carson, Carson Dunlop & Assoc.

File Number: 5849


Page 37 of 37

Documents

FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS 1322 N Marguerite Rd ......608 State St. South Kirkland, WA 98033 [email protected] +1.800.571.FAIR FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS 1322 N Marguerite Rd, Spokane