32
Isabel Blanco-Penedo Animal Welfare, IRTA www.impro-dairy.eu Farm centric participatory approach to reduce production diseases Seminar “Animal health in organic dairy farming in Poland“ 15th of March 2016, Radom

Farm centric participatory approach to reduce production diseases · 2016. 3. 23. · Isabel Blanco-Penedo Animal Welfare, IRTA Farm centric participatory approach to reduce production

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    to reduce production diseases

    Seminar

    “Animal health in organic dairy farming in Poland“

    15th of March 2016,

    Radom

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    IMPRO topics

    • Assessment of animal health / production diseases

    • Farm centric participatory approach

    • Improvement of monitoring and prevention

    • Homeopathy and Phytotherapy

    • Tool for cost-benefit calculations

    • Motivations and attitudes: farmers, advisors and veterinarians

    2

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    3

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    4

    200 herds in total

    France: 55

    Germany: 60

    Spain: 28

    Sweden: 57

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    5

    2013 2014 2015

    First visit

    •Researcher

    •Get to know each other

    •Collect information

    Second visit

    •Participatory approach

    •Farmer, veterinarian, advisor

    •Researcher as moderator

    Questionnaire

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    Second visit:

    •Farm walk

    •Joint evaluation of the situation

    •System analysis by an impact matrix

    •Cost-assessment of production diseases

    •Identify areas in need of improvement

    •Discuss appropriate measures

    •Agreement on an action plan

    •Feedback session

    6

    tim

    eto

    cra

    ft.c

    o.u

    k

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    Second visit:

    •Farm walk

    •Joint evaluation of the situation

    •System analysis by an impact matrix

    •Cost-assessment of production diseases

    •Identify areas in need of improvement

    •Discuss appropriate measures

    •Agreement on an action plan

    •Feedback session

    7

    tim

    eto

    cra

    ft.c

    o.u

    k

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Characteristics of IMPRO farms

    • Time since conversion: under 1 to 29 years (median 7)

    • Herds largest in Sweden (68.1 cows) and smallest in Spain (29.7)

    Range: 7 – 377

    8

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Characteristics of IMPRO farms

    9

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Characteristics of IMPRO farms

    • 70% of farms had loose housing with cubicles

    • Automatic milking systems:

    – 10% of farms in Germany

    – 49% of farms in Sweden

    – None in Spain and France

    • Breeds:

    – Holstein: 48% of cows

    – Red Dairy Cattle: 16%

    – Simmental: 10%

    10

    dairyb

    usin

    ess.c

    om

    ggi.de

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Characteristics of IMPRO farms

    • Milk yield (energy-corrected):

    – 6.588 kg in Germany

    – 5.742 kg in Spain

    – 6.378 kg in France

    – 8.979 kg Sweden

    • Range: 2.324 – 10.880 kg

    11

    keeleyhire.co.uk

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Animal Health / Production Diseases

    • Diseases caused by several factors

    • Associated with husbandry, feeding, performance, breeding, and management

    • IMPRO focus: Production disease complexes

    – Udder

    – Metabolism

    – Reproduction

    – Lameness

    12

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Mastitis

    high somatic cell count

    13

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Lameness

    3 scores Welfare Quality®

    14

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Reproduction

    prolonged calving interval

    15

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Metabolism

    risk of subacute ruminal

    acidosis

    (Milk fat < 3%

    later than 30 DIM)

    16

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Metabolism

    risk of subclinical ketosis

    (Fat - protein ratio > 1.5

    until 100 DIM)

    17

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Production diseaseson IMPRO farms

    Replacement rate

    proportion of first calvings

    18

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    Second visit:

    •farm walk

    •joint evaluation of the situation

    •system analysis by an impact matrix

    •cost-assessment of production diseases

    •identify areas in need of improvement

    •discuss appropriate measures

    •agreement on an action plan

    •feedback session

    19

    tim

    eto

    cra

    ft.c

    o.u

    k

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    System analysis by an impact matrix

    20

    Animal health = a system property

    • Intensive interactions betweenindividual factors

    • New, unforseeable propertiesemerge from these interactions

    Animal health is an emergent property of the farm organismor farm system resulting from the interactions between

    individual factors.

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    21

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    System analysis by an impact matrix

    22

    make system interaction visible

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    System analysis by an impact matrix

    23

    Number Variable

    1 Milk performance

    2 Production diseases

    3 Financial resources

    4 Labour capacity

    5 Feeding

    6 Housing conditions

    7 Reproduction management

    8 Dry cow management

    9 Calf and heifer management

    10 Herd health monitoring

    11 Hygiene

    12 Treatments

    13 Knowledge and skills

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    24

    200 “photos” of farm centric diagnosis

    DE

    SE

    FR

    ES

    Feeding Production diseases

    Labour capacity

    Milk performance

    Financial resources

    Reproduction management

    Dry cow management

    Calf and heifer management

    Hygien

    eTreatments

    Knowledge and

    skills

    Housing conditions

    Herd health monitoring

    FR: Treatments

    ES - FRDE - SE

    FR - SE

    DE - ES

    DE - FR

    ES - SE

    SE

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    25

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Farm centric participatory approach

    Second visit:

    •farm walk

    •joint evaluation of the situation

    •system analysis by an impact matrix

    •cost-assessment of production diseases

    •identify areas in need of improvement

    •discuss appropriate measures

    •agreement on an action plan

    •feedback session

    26

    tim

    eto

    cra

    ft.c

    o.u

    k

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Action plans

    • In 8% of farms no actions wereidentified

    • Others: 1 – 22 measures per farm (median 8)

    • Least actions in France (2.5), most in Sweden (12)

    • Some actions very general (‘improve feeding’), others very specific (‘use dry-cow therapy in case of positive California Mastitis Test’)

    27

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Implementation

    • Implemented measures:0 – 17

    • 93.6% of farms implemented at least one measure

    • Least in France (median 1), most in Sweden (median 7)

    • Implementation rate:

    – France: 82%

    – Germany: 67%

    – Sweden: 65%

    – Spain: 18%

    28

    oshaguard.com

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu J.E.Duval, EAAP2015 - Warsaw, Poland

    ATTITUDE and MOTIVATION

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    Constraints

    • Most not implemented actions related to construction

    • Other limitations:

    – time constraints

    – doubts about the effect

    – excessive costs

    – absence of the initial problem

    – implementation of alternative action(s)

    – lack of expertise

    – doubts about the appropriate-ness of the action

    30

    pixgel.com

    suhaila

    lgosaib

    i.com

    clipartpanda.com

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    IMPLEMENTACION OF MEASURES

    Country Model effects

    Caracteristics/ indicator

    DE ES FR SE

    year ⨯

    countryb Yearc

    Average number of cows 5.4* 3.5 3.7 17.8*

  • Isabel Blanco-Penedo

    Animal Welfare, IRTAwww.impro-dairy.eu

    • Animal health is not as good as we want it to be→ there is need for improvement!

    • Production diseases are related to the management→ a change in management can prevent them!

    • Reasons for production diseases are different in each farm→ look at the whole farm system!

    • A participatory approach helps to identify suitable measures for yourindividual farm→ talk to your vet/advisor!

    32