Fayetteville Flyer - Budget Impact: Account Number · 2019. 3. 4. · G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6524 RZN 2827 E. Whippoorwill Ln. (Roth Family

$Page 1: Fayetteville Flyer - Budget Impact: Account Number · 2019. 3. 4. · G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6524 RZN 2827 E. Whippoorwill Ln. (Roth Family$
Comments:

Purchase Order Number:

Change Order Number:

Previous Ordinance or Resolution #

Approval Date:

Original Contract Number:

Project Number

Budget Impact:

FundAccount Number

Project Title

City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form

2019-0124Legistar File ID

3/5/2019City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only

RZN 19-6524: Rezone (2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN./ROTH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, 411): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties located at 2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 2.14 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE.

N/A for Non-Agenda Item

Action Recommendation:Submitted By

Garner Stoll CITY PLANNING (630)

Division / Department

2/15/2019

Submitted Date

No

-$

Must Attach Completed Budget Adjustment!V20180321

Budgeted Item?

Does item have a cost?

Budget Adjustment Attached?

Current Budget

Funds Obligated

Current Balance

Item Cost

Budget Adjustment

Remaining Budget

-$

-$

NA

NA

-$

MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2019 TO: Mayor, Fayetteville City Council THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, Planning Director FROM: Harry Davis, Planner DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: RZN 19-6524: Rezone (2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN./ROTH FAMILY

PARTNERSHIP, 411): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties located at 2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 2.14 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE.

RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of an ordinance to rezone the subject property to RSF-8, Residential Single-family, 8 Units per Acre, as shown in the attached Exhibits ‘A’ and ‘B’. BACKGROUND: The subject property is comprised of two parcels located near the southeast corner of Crossover Road and Whippoorwill Lane. The property totals approximately 2.14 acres, is zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre, and is currently developed with a single-family home on the easternmost lot. The westernmost parcel has a small pond. Request: The request is to rezone the property from RSF-4 to RSF-8, Residential Single-family, 8 Units per Acre. The applicant stated they may want to subdivide the property and build new single-family homes. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding properties. RSF-8 is limited in size, density, and single-family only by-right. Since this zoning district has a front setback, future development can be located at a similar distance from the road like adjacent homes. Due to the location of the property being somewhat isolated at the entrance at this subdivision, the size of the property, and a mix of surrounding residential types, staff does not anticipate an 8 unit per acre density to be detrimental to surrounding properties and uses. Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff believes that the proposal is compatible with the goals in City Plan 2030, adopted land use policies, and the future land use designation for this location. This

2

property, designated as a Residential Neighborhood Area, envisions primarily residential uses in a variety of complimentary building types and configurations. RSF-8 would allow higher range of residential density not allowed in the current zoning district. For this location in particular, having a greater density of residential development would contribute to a transect of density and intensity from Crossover Road into adjacent neighborhoods. DISCUSSION: On February 11, 2019, the Planning Commission forwarded the proposal to City Council with a recommendation for approval by a vote of 7-0-1, with Commissioner Winston dissenting. As a part of discussion, several members of the public spoke in opposition to the proposal citing concerns over pedestrian safety, increased traffic, decrease property values and neighborhood character, drainage impacts, and objection to an increased density. For the dissenting Commissioner, they wished to have more information available about the existing pond on the subject property with a determination on its importance for stormwater management and drainage for the surrounding neighborhood. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Attachments:

• Exhibit A • Exhibit B • Planning Commission Staff Report

Proposed RSF-8

SETTER ST

CROS

SOVE

R RD

WHIPPOORWILL LN

POIN

TER

LN

MEANDERING WAY

STARDUST LN

BOARDWALK CT

RSF-4

C-2

RMF-24

P-1

C-1

LegendPlanning AreaFayetteville City LimitsTrail (Proposed)Building Footprint

Close Up ViewRZN19-6524 ROTH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP,

N

0 150 300 450 60075Feet

1 inch = 200 feet

Subject Property

Zoning AcresRSF-8 2.1

Total 2.1

EXHIBIT 'A'19-6524

EXHIBIT 'B'19-6524

TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Harry Davis, Planner MEETING DATE: February 11, 2019 SUBJECT: RZN 19-6524: Rezone (2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN./ROTH FAMILY

PARTNERSHIP, 411): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties located at 2827 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 2.14 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN 19-6524 to City Council, based on the findings contained in this report. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to forward RZN 19-6524 to City Council with a recommendation for approval.” BACKGROUND: The subject property is comprised of two parcels located near the southeast corner of Crossover Road and Whippoorwill Lane. The property totals approximately 2.14 acres, is zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre, and is currently developed with a single-family home on the easternmost lot. The westernmost parcel has a small pond. Surrounding land uses and zoning is depicted in Table 1.

Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning

Direction Land Use Zoning North Single-family Residential; Duplex RMF-24, Residential Multi-family, 24 Units per Acre South Single-family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre East Single-family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre West Single-family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre

Request: The request is to rezone the parcel from RSF-4 to RSF-8, Residential Single-family, 8 Units per Acre. The applicant stated they may want to subdivide the property and build new single-family homes. Public Comment: Staff has met with several members of the public about this request that have made general inquiries about the proposal. Several neighbors did submit a list of concerns (see attached) that included pedestrian safety, the concept that this proposal would lead to more requests for rezoning, a decrease in neighborhood character as a result of the proposed rezone, traffic, and objections to greater density.

UPDATED W PC RESULTS

G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6524 RZN 2827 E. Whippoorwill Ln. (Roth Family Partnership) 411\

INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: The subject area has frontage access to East Whippoorwill Lane, a partially

improved local street with asphalt paving and curb and gutter. In addition, the property has frontage access to Crossover Road, a fully improved principal arterial and state highway. Any street improvements required in these areas would be determined at the time of development proposal. Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage will be determined at time of development.

Water: Public water is available to the subject area. An existing 2.25-inch watermain is

present along East Whippoorwill Lane that could serve the eastern portion of the site. An extension of this main might be required at the time of development to serve the western portion of the site.

Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to the subject area. An existing 8-inch sanitary sewer

main runs along the southern boundary of the subject area. Drainage: Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage will be determined at

time of development. No portion of this property is identified as FEMA regulated floodplains. There are no protected streams present in the subject parcel. No portion of this parcel lies within the Hillside-Hilltop Overlay District. Hydric soils appear to be present in a small portion of the property. There is an existing pond located in this area.

. Fire: The site will be protected by Ladder 5, located at 2979 N. Crossover Road. The

property is located approximately 1.6 miles from the fire station with an anticipated drive time of approximately 4 minutes using existing streets. The anticipated response time would be approximately 6.2 minutes. Fire Department response time is calculated based on the drive time plus 1 minute for dispatch and 1.2 minutes for turn-out time. Within the City Limits, the Fayetteville Fire Department has a response time goal of 6 minutes for an engine and 8 minutes for a ladder truck.

Police: The Police Department expressed no concerns with this request. CITY PLAN 2030 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates the properties within the proposed rezone as Residential Neighborhood Area. These areas are primarily residential in nature and support a variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context, including single family, multifamily and rowhouses. Residential Neighborhood encourages highly connected, compact blocks with gridded street patterns and reduced setbacks. It also encourages traditional neighborhood development that incorporates low-intensity non-residential uses intended to serve the surrounding neighborhood, such as retail and offices, on corners and along connecting corridors. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff believes that the proposal is compatible with

the goals in City Plan 2030, adopted land use policies, and the future land use designation for this location. This property, designated as a Residential Neighborhood Area, envisions primarily residential uses in a variety of


complimentary building types and configurations. RSF-8 would allow higher range of residential density not allowed in the current zoning district. For this location in particular, having a greater density of residential development would contribute to a transect of density and intensity from Crossover Road into adjacent neighborhoods.

Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding properties. RSF-8 is limited in size, density, and single-family only by-right. Since this zoning district has a front setback, future development can be located at a similar distance from the road like adjacent homes. Due to the location of the property being somewhat isolated at the entrance at this subdivision, the size of the property, and a mix of surrounding residential types, staff does not anticipate an 8 unit per acre density to be detrimental to surrounding properties and uses.

2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: Staff believes that there is sufficient justification for rezoning the property to

RSF-8. This justification includes diversifying the mix of residential types close to Crossover Road through allowing varied lot sizes and densities by-right.

3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Rezoning the property to RSF-8 would increase traffic to this location above

the potential of the current zoning district, but the impact is not expected to be significant given the surrounding improved road network.

4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and

thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities.

Finding: Rezoning the property to RSF-8 would increase the load on public services

above the potential of the current zoning district, but the impact is not expected to be significant given the evaluation by the various city divisions.

5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of

considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:

a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted

under its existing zoning classifications;

b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable.

Finding: N/A


RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends forwarding RZN 19-6524 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. ________________________________________________________________________

PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: February 11, 2019 ❒ Tabled ❒ Forwarded ❒ Denied Motion: Second: Vote:

BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None Attachments:

• Unified Development Code: o §161.07 - District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family - Four (4) Units Per Acre o §161.09 - District RSF-8, Residential Single-Family - Eight (8) Units Per Acre

• Public Comment • Request letter • One Mile Map • Close-up Map • Current Land Use Map • Future Land Use Map

Niederman

Sharp

7-0-1

Motion to forward to CC with recommendation forapproval

Motion passes; Winston dissenting


161.07 - District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family - Four (4) Units Per Acre

(A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types.

(B) Uses. (1) Permitted Uses . Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings

(2) Conditional Uses .

Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use

permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12a

Limited business

Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities Unit 44 Cluster Housing Development

(C) Density.

Single-family dwellings

Two (2) family dwellings

Units per acre 4 or less 7 or less

(D) Bulk and Area Regulations.

Single-family dwellings

Two (2) family dwellings

Lot minimum width

70 feet 80 feet

Lot area minimum

8,000 square feet

12,000 square feet

Land area per dwelling unit

8,000 square feet

6,000 square feet


Hillside Overlay District Lot minimum width

60 feet 70 feet

Hillside Overlay District Lot area minimum

8,000 square feet

12,000 square feet

Land area per dwelling unit

8,000 square feet

6,000 square feet

(E) Setback Requirements.

Front Side Rear 15 feet 5 feet 15 feet

(F) Building Height Regulations . Building Height Maximum 3 stories

(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot.

(Code 1991, §160.031; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99; Ord. No. 4858, 4-18-06; Ord. No. 5028, 6-19-07; Ord. No. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. No. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. No. 5921 , §1, 11-1-16; Ord. No. 5945 , §8, 1-17-17; Ord. No. 6015 , §1(Exh. A), 11-21-17)

https://library.municode.com/ar/fayetteville/ordinances/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=798384





161.09 - District RSF-8, Residential Single-Family - Eight (8) Units Per Acre

(A) Purpose. The RSF-8 Residential District is designed to bring historic platted development into conformity and to allow for the development of new single family residential areas with similar lot size, density, and land use as the historical neighborhoods in the downtown area.

(B) Uses. (1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings

(2) Conditional Uses.

Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use

permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12a

Limited business

Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities Unit 44 Cluster Housing Development

(C) Density.

By Right Single-family dwelling units per acre 8 or less

(D) Bulk and Area Regulations.

(1) Lot Width Minimum.

Single-family 50

feet

Two (2) family 50

feet Townhouse, no more than two (2) attached

25 feet

(2) Lot Area Minimum.

Single-family 5,000 square feet


Two-family 5,000 square feet

(3) Land Area Per Dwelling Unit .

Single-family 5,000 square

feet

Two-family 5,000 square

feet Townhouse, no more than two (2) attached

2,500 square feet

(E) Setback Requirements.

Front Side Rear 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet

(F) Height Regulations.

Building Height Maximum 3 stories

(G) Building Area. The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area, except when a detached garage exists or is proposed; then the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area.

(Ord. No. 4783, 10-18-05; Ord. No. 5028, 6-19-07; Ord. No. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. No. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. No. 5921 , §1, 11-1-16; Ord. No. 5945 , §8, 1-17-17; Ord. No. 6015 , §1(Exh. A), 11-21-17)




1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Bl

ake

Her

rman

n <

bher

rm@

me.

com

>Se

nt:

Thur

sday

, Feb

ruar

y 07

, 201

9 8:

50 A

MTo

:D

avis

, Har

rySu

bjec

t:RZ

N-1

9-65

25

I app

ose this rezoning. It is n

ot fitting for the

neighbo

rhoo

d and wou

ld cause se

rious traffic and

parking

issues with

that m

any pe

ople.

Thank you,

Blake Herrm

ann

Senior Sales Executiv

e Fayetteville, AR

TSI H

ealth

care

20 Years of E

xcellence in Service

Since 19

97

101 Eu

ropa

Driv

e, Suite 200

Chapel Hill, N

C 27

517

Direct: 469

.667.004

8 Fax: 479.935

.923

8

tsihealth

care.com

Note: The

inform

ation contained in th

is tran

smission do

es not necessarily represent the

views o

f TSI Health

care (TSI). The

inform

ation contained herein is con

sidered

private an

d

confidentia

l material and

is protected

by US an

d Internationa

l trade

secrecy laws. It m

ay also

con

tain protected

health

care inform

ation covered un

der a

pplicab

le HIPAA

regu

latio

ns. An

y

duplication, dissem

ination, or redistrib

ution of th

e do

cument o

r any of its con

tents w

ithou

t prio

r written consent b

y the au

thor is strictly

prohibited. If you

received

this message

in error,

please inform

the send

er by replying

and

delete this em

ail and

any cop

ies immediately.

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ci

ndy

Mur

ray

<m

urra

st@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Wed

nesd

ay, F

ebru

ary

06, 2

019

9:18

PM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

RZN

-19-

6524

Hi Harry,

Thank you for taking the tim

e to re

ad our email. W

e have se

veral con

cerns regarding

the plan

of p

uttin

g 6 ho

uses next to the 28

27 E. W

hipp

owill hou

se.

1. Safety of o

ur children. W

e moved

here almost 2

years ago

so we could walk ou

r children to sc

hool. Even

thou

gh th

ere is no sid

ewalk on

Whipp

orwill,

the ne

ighb

orho

od traffic is currently very minim

al.

2. Green

space. If th

ey ta

ke away th

e po

nd and

trees, what w

ill th

ey add

to re

place the greenspace?

3. Ha

ving

6 narrow hou

ses n

ext to each other will not m

atch up with

its e

xisting ne

ighb

orho

od.

We wou

ld not app

rove re

zoning

to RSF‐8. We think if they put 3 to

4 hou

ses instead

of 6

that wou

ld be more approp

riate. We are no

t against develop

ing the

land

but wou

ld like to

have a more balanced

app

roach.

Kind

ly,

Steve & Cindy

Murray

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:D

anie

lle A

llen

<ju

stic

egirl

82@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Wed

nesd

ay, F

ebru

ary

06, 2

019

9:07

PM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

RZN

-19-

6524

Dear M

r. Da

vis,

I live in th

e Whipp

oorw

ill/Inw

ood ne

ighb

orho

od th

at wou

ld be affected

by the prop

osed

rezoning

sche

duled to be discussed on

Feb

. 11th.

My hu

sband and I have three children and were draw

n to th

is ne

ighb

orho

od because of the

neighbo

rhoo

d's spacing, large lots, and

quiet streets.

I just w

anted to state for the

record th

at we are strongly opp

osed

to th

is rezoning.

We feel th

at add

ing that m

any ho

uses to

the bo

ttom

of the

street wou

ld greatly change the dynamic of o

ur quiet neighbo

rhoo

d. It wou

ld affe

ct traffic and

prop

erty value

s.

We do

not believe th

at it wou

ld add

to or e

nhance th

e ne

ighb

orho

od in

any

way. Please consider our opp

osition

to th

is rezoning

whe

n considering your

recommen

datio

n to th

e city.

Thank you for y

our tim

e and consideration.

Sincerely,

Danielle Allen

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Cu

rth,

Jona

than

Sent

:M

onda

y, Ja

nuar

y 28

, 201

9 11

:51

AMTo

:D

avis

, Har

rySu

bjec

t:Ro

th R

ZN P

ublic

Com

men

t A

ttac

hmen

ts:

Mes

sage

from

Unk

now

n se

nder

(184

7894

9563

)

HD,

I spo

ke with

the Eileen

McG

arry on Whipp

oorw

ill (voicemail attache

d) and

she has significant con

cerns a

bout th

e rezoning

requ

est, includ

ing:

‐No sid

ewalks in

the ne

ighb

orho

od. This is d

angerous fo

r ped

estrians and

it cou

ld get worse with

more traffic;

‐App

roval cou

ld lead

to a ‘dom

ino effect’ of sub

sequ

ent rezon

ings th

rough the ne

ighb

orho

od;

‐Peo

ple in th

is neighbo

rhoo

d invest in

their h

omes and

it wou

ld be difficult for the

m to

move if the character o

f the

area changed;

‐Who

wou

ld want to live rig

ht next to Crossover? It will be prob

ably be renters w

hich is a problem

issue;

‐Traffic backs u

p all the

way from

Miss

ion and Crossover a

nd m

akes tu

rning ou

t on to Crossover exceedingly dangerous;

‐Add

ition

al dwellings will aggravate th

e bo

ttlene

ck of the

overall subd

ivision

; ‐The

poten

tial for eight dwellings is to

o many; th

ree or fo

ur wou

ld be okay.

I think

that su

mmarizes our con

versation, but I sent her you

r con

tact inform

ation in case there is anything

else

. Jona

than

Curth

Senior Plann

er

City Plann

ing Divisio

n City of Fayetteville, A

rkansas

jcurth@fayetteville‐ar.gov

47

9.57

5.83

08

Web

site l Faceb

ook l Twitter l Yo

utub

e

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ei

leen

McG

arry

<m

em47

54@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Thur

sday

, Feb

ruar

y 07

, 201

9 10

:21

AMTo

:D

avis

, Har

rySu

bjec

t:U

rgen

t- in

put f

or y

our r

epor

t on

RZN

652

4 -1

9A

ttac

hmen

ts:

Shor

tlist

.rtf

Hi Harry,

Attached

is a bullet p

oint list of con

cerns a

nd objectio

ns to

the rezoning

subm

itted

to m

e by

other hom

eowne

rs and

also

includ

e my ow

n. This is for th

e pu

rpose

of gettin

g those ob

jections on record in

you

r rep

ort b

efore today's n

oon de

adline. Hom

eowne

rs will con

tinue

, of cou

rse, to

send

their ind

ividual inp

ut.

Please ackno

wledge receipt o

f this d

ocum

ent.

Thank you,

Eileen

McG

arry

2976

E W

hipp

oorw

ill Ln, Fayetteville, A

R 72

701

February 7, 2019

Mr. Harry Davis City of Fayetteville Planning Division 125 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 RE: RZN-6524-19 Dear Mr. Davis, This is in reference to our phone conversation yesterday afternoon. During this conversation you told me that in order for homeowners to have their input on this rezoning proposal be part of the record and included in your report to the Planning Commission, they needed to send this input to you by no later than noon today. However, we were not previously informed of this deadline. I made an attempt to reach as many homeowners as possible with this information but was not able to contact them all. After discussion with several other homeowners, we decided to list our major concerns as a group so that you can include them in your report. These are the main concerns and objections to the proposed rezoning:

• Proposed rezoning seeking high density is incompatible with the low density of existing neighborhood lots

• Vehicular traffic bottlenecks at intersections which are the only two access points to the neighborhood

• Increased vehicular traffic around the Whippoorwill-Inwood loop, which lacks sidewalks

• Neighborhood pedestrian and child safety

• Setting a precedent for future continued rezoning of other neighborhood parcels to higher density

• Deterioration of neighborhood environmental surroundings and ambiance

• Greater noise pollution from Crossover Road due to the removal of a large number of trees

• Flooding in rezoned lots due to their location and the removal of a large number of trees

• Failure to sell proposed homes, resulting in those homes becoming rentals

• Negative impact on existing homeowner property values

As we discussed, neighborhood homeowners may continue to submit their input individually through email, phone conversations, and the February 11th public meeting, before the Planning Commission makes its recommendation to the City Council. Sincerely, Eileen McGarry 2976 E. Whippoorwill Ln. Fayetteville, AR 72701

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Al

len,

Jare

d <

Jare

d.Al

len@

tyso

n.co

m>

Sent

:Th

ursd

ay, F

ebru

ary

07, 2

019

10:5

9 AM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

RZN

-19-

6524

Mr. Da

vis,

My name is Ja

red Allen, and

I am

a re

side

nt of the

Whipp

oorw

ill/Inw

ood area

in Fayetteville. I w

ould like to

voice m

y disapp

roval of the

rezoning

propo

sal on

Whipp

oorw

ill Lane.

The planne

d additio

n of six ho

uses in

such a sm

all area will negatively im

pact th

e ne

ighb

orho

od. As you

are no do

ubt a

ware, th

ere are fewer th

an six ho

uses

total right now

on the south sid

e of W

hipp

oorw

ill Lane. A

dding such a large nu

mbe

r of residen

ces so close to th

e intersectio

n of a m

ajor highw

ay cou

ld cause

serio

us issues re

lated to traffic flow

. I regularly jog past th

is locatio

n, often

times with

one

or m

ore of m

y youn

g daughters. W

e rid

e bicycles along

this stretch

of ro

ad as w

ell. Increasin

g the nu

mbe

r of veh

icles d

riving through the area

to su

ch a degree wou

ld not only be

a nuisance for the

current re

side

nts, but cou

ld

potentially lead

to se

rious harm.

I recognize th

at Fayetteville is a won

derful com

mun

ity to

live in, that w

e will con

tinue

to grow, and

that develop

men

t is n

ecessary to

meet the

increasin

g ho

using de

mands. Bu

t growth and

develop

men

t can

con

tinue

with

the existing zoning

plan, with

no ne

ed fo

r such a drastic

change to th

e look, feel, and

activ

ities of the

neighbo

rhoo

d. Please consider th

e ne

eds a

nd desire

s of the

current re

side

nts o

f this a

rea, and

recommen

d that th

is re

zoning

propo

sal be

denied

. Thank you for y

our tim

e and consideration.

Jare

d A

llen

479-

290-

1656

This em

ail and

any

files transmitted

with

it are con

fiden

tial and

intend

ed so

lely fo

r the

use of the

add

ressee. If you

are not th

e intend

ed add

ressee, the

n you

have re

ceived

this em

ail in error a

nd any

use, dissem

ination, fo

rwarding, prin

ting, or cop

ying

of this e

mail is strictly

prohibited. Please no

tify us im

med

iately of

your uninten

ded receipt b

y reply and then

delete this em

ail and

you

r rep

ly. Tyson

Foo

ds, Inc. and

its s

ubsid

iarie

s and

affiliates w

ill not be he

ld liable to

any

pe

rson

resulting

from

the un

intend

ed or u

nautho

rized

use of a

ny inform

ation containe

d in th

is em

ail or a

s a re

sult of any

add

ition

s or deletions of information

originally con

tained

in th

is em

ail.

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Je

ssic

a Au

xier

<ja

uxie

r430

@gm

ail.c

om>

Sent

:Th

ursd

ay, F

ebru

ary

07, 2

019

9:14

AM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

RZN

-19-

6524

Goo

d morning, I am writing in re

gard to

the prop

osed

re‐zon

ing on

East W

hipp

oorw

ill Lane. M

y family and

I pu

rchased and moved

into our hou

se th

e last

weekend

in Sep

tembe

r, 20

18. M

y hu

sband and I ren

ted a townh

ouse in

Sou

th Springdale and an

apartmen

t in Overla

nd Park, Kansas. W

e de

cide

d to put our

roots d

own in Fayetteville permanen

tly so

the ho

use hu

nt began. W

e looked

at a

bout 30‐50

hou

ses o

ver a

period of abo

ut 5 m

onths. W

e were looking for

something

special. Something

that wou

ld be completely diffe

rent th

an th

e rental lifestyle we had know

and

wanted to get away from

. We were the first peo

ple

to view th

is ho

use the first day it wen

t on the market a

nd also

the first peo

ple to put in

an offer. It all w

orked ou

t so pe

rfectly

and

we were so proud

and

relieved

to start o

ur lives in such a uniqu

e, quiet, and

beautifu

l neighbo

rhoo

d. If we had know

n then

that in

several m

onths that p

oten

tially 6‐8 to

wnh

ouse like hom

es

wou

ld be bu

ilt right b

eside the west side of our yard, we wou

ld not have considered

this ho

use. That’s exactly what w

e were trying

to get away from

. This is the

kind

of n

eighbo

rhoo

d that you

kno

w you

r neighbo

rs, but you

don

’t always see

them

. We have our sp

ace, but th

e re‐zon

ing wou

ld change the who

le dynam

ic.

Most o

f the

hou

ses o

n Whipp

orwill Lane and Inwoo

d have large plots o

f land be

tween each hou

se. The

pon

d is a place that we like to ta

ke our children. The

y love th

e wildlife and I feel safe letting my son play aroun

d ou

r neighbo

rhoo

d. If th

at m

any ho

uses are built I w

ould not fe

el sa

fe any

longer. It w

ould brin

g more

traffic con

gestion espe

cially since it’s right at the

beginning

of the

road. D

uring rush hou

rs it’s alre

ady difficult to get off whipp

oorw

ill onto Crossover. Also, being

a stay at h

ome mom

, I get m

y exercise by walking

with

my baby

in a stroller u

p whipp

oorw

ill, dow

n Inwoo

d, to

Crossover, and

then

back up

Whipp

oorw

ill. I

wou

ld not fe

el sa

fe any

longer due

to th

e increased traffic. W

e love our quiet neighbo

rhoo

d. W

e also love our our sp

ace, which is why

we moved

here in th

e first

place. The

re‐zon

ing wou

ld change everything

for u

s, and

not fo

r the

better. We completely un

derstand

the de

mand for smaller closer togethe

r hou

sing, as w

e were renters for m

any years, but I also th

ink there are plen

ty fo

r places a

roun

d Fayetteville whe

re th

at is practical. It just d

oesn’t make sense on

this street.

Aside from

our children, our hom

e is something

we are most p

roud

of. We love Fayetteville and

feel lucky to live in

such a won

derful com

mun

ity. Please

consider our fa

mily and

our re

ason

ing for m

oving he

re as y

ou are trying

to m

ake your decision

. Thank

you

for y

our tim

e.

Jessica Teall and

Fam

ily

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Jo

n Te

all <

jont

eall@

yaho

o.co

m>

Sent

:Th

ursd

ay, F

ebru

ary

07, 2

019

11:0

0 AM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

RZN

-19-

6524

My

nam

e is

Jon

Iain

Tea

ll, a

nd m

y fa

mily

and

I re

side

nex

t doo

r to

the

lots

that

are

up

for t

he p

ossi

ble

rezo

ning

und

er R

ZN-1

9-65

24.

I a

m a

skin

g fo

r you

to d

eny

the

rezo

ning

requ

est f

or o

ur n

eigh

borh

ood.

We

rece

ntly

pur

chas

ed o

ur h

ouse

and

of o

f the

maj

or re

ason

s w

as th

e tra

nqui

lity

of o

ur

neig

hbor

hood

. W

e lo

ve o

ur n

eigh

borh

ood!

! W

e co

uld

have

pur

chas

ed a

hou

se a

lmos

t any

whe

re in

Fay

ette

ville

, but

we

wan

ted

spac

e fo

r our

you

ng fa

mily

to

grow

, and

pla

y. I

am

afra

id th

at if

we

expa

nd th

is s

ectio

n of

our

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d, w

e w

ill b

e se

t up

to lo

ose

mor

e th

an w

e ga

in.

The

tranq

uilit

y w

ill be

lost

, the

traf

fic

will

incr

ease

, and

the

over

all f

eelin

g of

of e

whi

ppoo

rwill

ln w

ill be

forg

otte

n. I

wou

ld li

ke to

exp

and

on m

y st

atem

ent,

but I

am

und

er a

tim

e cr

unch

to g

et th

is s

ent

to y

ou.

I hop

e yo

u he

ar o

ur c

ries,

and

den

y th

e re

zoni

nh.

Than

k yo

u,

Jon

Iain

Tea

ll

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ra

y Al

len

Park

er <

ray.

a.pa

rker

.jr@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Wed

nesd

ay, F

ebru

ary

06, 2

019

11:0

2 PM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Subj

ect:

Requ

est#

RZN

19-

6524

Mr. Da

vis,

I wish

to statem

ent m

y ob

jection to th

is propo

sed zoning

change.

The additio

n of six townh

ouses to Whipp

oorw

ill St. will change the character o

f the

neighbo

rhoo

d, add

add

ition

al traffic to

an already crow

ded street and

disrup

t ingress & egress to the ne

ighb

orho

od while th

is hu

ge building project is g

oing

on. This in turn will fo

rce speeding, unw

anted traffic onto my street, E.

Inwoo

d Lane

, which com

pletes a loop

with

Whipp

oorw

ill.

I hop

e you will re

voke or a

t least amen

d this prop

osed

change.

Sincerely,

Ray Parker

2965

E. Inw

ood Lane

21

4‐33

6‐74

52

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ri

ck <

big_

smile

_2u@

yaho

o.co

m>

Sent

:Th

ursd

ay, F

ebru

ary

07, 2

019

9:16

AM

To:

Dav

is, H

arry

Cc:

lindy

chu

rchi

ll; G

utie

rrez

, Son

ia; M

arsh

, Sar

ahSu

bjec

t:RZ

N-1

9-65

24

Dear M

r. Da

vis,

My wife

and

I want to let y

ou kno

w we are against the

rezoning

of the

se parcels.

Our re

ason

s are:

1. High de

nsity

lots wou

ld dim

inish

the visual app

eal of the

neighbo

rhoo

d.

2. The

increase of traffic at th

e mou

th of W

hipp

oorw

ill wou

ld be un

desirable. (Ro

ughly a 30

percent increase, 25 ho

uses to

32).

3. If app

roved, it wou

ld se

t precede

nce for con

verting more of th

e larger lots on Whipp

oorw

ill to

high de

nsity

zoning.

4. Once approved

, what g

uarantee

do we have th

at th

e prop

osed

plan will be executed

? Non

e to m

y lim

ited know

ledge. The

owne

r cou

ld se

ll the prop

erty and

what h

appe

ns th

en? Miss

ion He

ights c

omes to

mind at th

is m

omen

t.

5. The

con

struction ph

ase wou

ld be tw

ice as long

und

er th

ese cond

ition

s. Large trucks cho

king

the traffic flow

. Whe

re are th

e workers going

to park? The

re

are no

side

walks on Whipp

oorw

ill. I can

foresee real traffic problem

s.

6. The

develop

er stated

in th

eir letter that h

igh de

nsity

zoning

was "... in

an area

whe

re it is encou

raged. ". Who

is encou

raging

this?

Is the

city

actually

encouraging this?

I gue

ss m

y dilemma is why

change the zoning

at a

ll? The

city

has a m

aster p

lan and made the de

cisio

n for the

current criteria. W

e bo

ught in

this area

because

of th

e visio

n refle

cted

in th

e master p

lan. M

y analogy is: It se

ems like a pe

rson

walked up

to a poker gam

e, bou

ght a

seat at the

table after seeing the hand

they

were to play and then

ann

ounced

they want d

ifferen

t select cards to

be wild. The

y know

the change will im

prove their h

and bu

t whe

re doe

s that leave everyon

e else at the

table?

So we are ho

peful that the

current m

aster p

lan for o

ur neighbo

rhoo

d will be ho

nored and no

t allowed

to su

ffer from piecemeal erosio

n.

Respectfully,

Richard and Lind

a Ch

urchill

1681

N Stardust Ln

Sent from

BlueM

ail

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ei

leen

McG

arry

<m

em47

54@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Thur

sday

, Feb

ruar

y 07

, 201

9 11

:57

AMTo

:D

avis

, Har

rySu

bjec

t:U

RGEN

T- m

y pe

rson

al in

put f

or y

our r

epor

t on

RZN

6524

-19

Att

achm

ents

:M

cGar

ryRe

zone

Inpu

t.rtf

Hi Harry,

This is ou

r personal inp

ut on the rezoning

. Please ackno

wlege re

ceipt. Thanks.

Mike & Eileen

McG

arry

2976

E W

hipp

oorw

ill Ln, Fayetteville, A

R 72

701

February 7, 2019

Mr. Harry Davis City of Fayetteville Planning Division 125 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 RE: RZN-6524-19 Dear Mr. Davis, The following is a list of our objections to the proposed rezoning as homeowners that will be negatively impacted if the rezoning is permitted. Setting a precedent for future continued rezoning of other neighborhood parcels to higher density We are not against additional development in this neighborhood. In fact, building single family homes on these parcels might help prevent future rezoning of this area into commercial zoning at some time in the future, due to the nature of Crossover Rd. in general. However, we object to the number of tract splits being proposed which is the stated reason for the rezoning request by the developer, i.e. reducing minimal lot frontage from 70 to 50 feet. This is an attempt to shoehorn an unreasonable number of houses into tiny lots. We fear that if this is accomplished, a domino effect will occur as future parcels come up for sale. In fact, sales may occur in addition to the usual reasons because of other homeowners wanting to flee this development and the resulting traffic problems (see below) it adds. By domino effect, we mean similar future rezoning requests which can then point to this rezoning as a precedent. This would completely destroy the character of our present neighborhood, which is rustic, open, wooded, relatively quiet, and safe. These are the reasons we as retirees bought our current home. We bought it as much for the character of the neighborhood as for the house.

Traffic Problems We have only two access points in and out of this neighborhood… the intersections at Crossover and Whippoorwill, and at Crossover and Inwood. As we have stated in our phone conversation, there is already a problem in that we regularly have bumper to bumper traffic jams from the light at the Mission/Crossover intersection all the way back past Inwood Lane. This makes a left turn impossible at those times, and a right turn possible only if cars on Crossover yield. Putting this many homes right at the stress point, at the intersection of Crossover and Whippoorwill, with their driveways emptying onto Whippoorwill will exacerbate this problem. It will also increase vehicular traffic around the Whippoorwill-Inwood loop, as drivers seek to find the best route in and out. This entire problem will increase as more people move to Fayetteville and more commercial and residential infill occurs in our immediate surrounding area. This neighborhood is and will be particularly affected because of northbound commuters to Springdale/Rogers/Bentonville, northbound travelers to NWA mall (accessed by Crossover and Joyce) and the major shopping center on the SE corner of Crossover and Mission which is two blocks north of us. The aggregate infill occurring along Crossover near Mission not only affects our neighborhood, but other neighborhoods nearby as well as commuters in general.

Neighborhood pedestrian and child safety Currently homeowners use the loop to walk dogs, walk with children, push baby carriages, etc. This loop has no sidewalks. Therefore, increased vehicular traffic around this loop presents a danger to pedestrians, especially children. We explained in the section on traffic problems why we believe this will occur.

Negative impact on existing homeowner property values We believe all of these problems listed above will have a negative impact on our property values and decrease the desirability of our property to future prospective buyers.

Thank you for the opportunity to express our concerns in this matter. Sincerely, Mike & Eileen McGarry 2976 E. Whippoorwill Ln. Fayetteville, AR 72701

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:Ca

rey

Hol

mes

<ho

lmes

in1@

gmai

l.com

>Se

nt:

Mon

day,

Feb

ruar

y 11

, 201

9 5:

27 P

MTo

:D

avis

, Har

rySu

bjec

t:ZN

19-

6524

Att

achm

ents

:H

ello

.doc

x

Hi Harry. Please includ

e this re

spon

se to

the rezoning.

Thanks

Carey

Sent from

my iPho

ne

Rezoning – RZN 19-6524 2/11/2019

Hello. My name is Carey Holmes and my wife Karen and I have lived in the Crossover Heights subdivision on Stardust Lane for 20 years.

I would like to take a minute to review the letter (no date shown) submitted by Bates & Associates on behalf of Roth Family Partnership and Elite Equity Group of AR for rezoning.

They say their reason for this request is to “take advantage of the minimal lot frontage requirements of RSF-8 zoning”. That’s legal speak for “to build as many buildings as possible”. They’re in the business of making money. They purchased the 2 lots in March 2015 and have tried to sell these properties without success. Instead of building homes in line with the neighborhood, they are asking the citizens of Fayetteville to forgive their bad investment and split the properties so they can build multiple homes or rentals in hopes of recouping their bad investment. They don’t live in this area and don’t care about the affect it has on the neighborhood or the city of Fayetteville.

Speaking of, they also say the rezoning will “not have an adverse effect on the uses and will have little effect on the traffic…”. Every weekday morning, traffic is backed up past Whippoorwill and Inwood to Lovers Lane and beyond. My wife and I both have to wait on someone to allow us to exit our street to enter Hwy 265. Adding an additional 6 homes or rental properties will add on average 18 extra autos to the congestion. More importantly, these new residents parking vehicles along Whippoorwill will deny entry from Hwy 265 when others are exiting. So, the effect is deterioration of neighborhood quality and more congestion at the intersection which makes for a dangerous and somewhat deadly entry onto and exit from Whippoorwill.

They comment that “rezoning would improve the area as a whole”. I find it hard to believe that even they can honestly say that it would improve the area!! Is everyone familiar with the Mission Heights subdivision just west of Park Place on Mission Ave which is less than a mile away from our neighborhood? The developers were allowed a rezoning to build homes/rental properties much like the ones being proposed here and those properties sit empty, an eyesore to the community but mostly a black eye for the Planning Commission and City Council Members that agreed to the zoning. That property sat empty for many, many years and after several tries at a variety of plans with several different developers, they approved a rezoning, just like this property is going through now. A bad investment gone wrong. So, improve the area as a whole they say? I believe our neighbors and community would argue otherwise and Mission Heights is a prime example of why allowing a rezoning will not be an improvement.

In closing, the rezoning request is not in line with the surrounding neighborhoods and communities, would increase the amount of traffic, street side parking, and create overcrowding in a quiet community. It would also deteriorate an existing community by devaluing properties and create an eyesore to an otherwise beautiful and longstanding neighborhood. Therefore, Karen and I would urge the Planning Commission and the City Council to NOT approve the rezoning request.

1

Dav

is, H

arry

From

:D

avis

, Har

rySe

nt:

Tues

day,

Feb

ruar

y 12

, 201

9 10

:47

AMTo

:Ri

ckCc

:lin

dy c

hurc

hill;

Gar

ner,

Andr

ewSu

bjec

t:RE

: RZN

-19-

6524

Rick,

Thank you for e

mailing me. Ju

st to

make it easie

r, I have respon

ded to you

r que

stions with

in th

e original email in red.

Sincerely,

Harry Da

vis

From

: Rick [m

ailto

:big_smile_2u@

yaho

o.com]

Sent: Tue

sday, Feb

ruary 12

, 201

9 9:39

AM

To: D

avis, Harry <hd

avis@

fayetteville‐ar.gov>

Cc: lindy

chu

rchill <lindychurchill@yaho

o.com>

Subject: RE: RZN

‐19‐65

24

Hi Harry,

We attend

ed last night's he

aring.It was very ed

ucational and

also

enlighten

ing to observe th

e he

aring process.

We came aw

ay with

some qu

estio

ns th

at I ho

pe you

can

answer fo

r me.

1. Wou

ld you

please elaborate the crite

ria fo

r how

many tim

es one

can

split a parcel before a subd

ivision

plan must b

e filed

?

Sure, a lot can

be split 3 times re

sulting

in 4 tracts with

out g

oing

through a subd

ivision

platting process.

2. The plan

subm

itted

show

s one

future parcel, tract 4

, made up

from

pieces o

f the

two existing parcels. Is th

is allowed

with

out "approval" b

y the Planning

Co

mmiss

ion?

I am not su

re I un

derstand

what you

mean, but in

term

s of sub

dividing

lots, a lot split or prope

rty line adjustmen

t is a

staff‐level, adm

inistrativ

e review

. Going

through a concurrent plat o

r sub

divisio

n plat process wou

ld re

quire

Plann

ing Co

mmiss

ion approval.

2

3. RSF‐8 requ

ires a

minim

um lot w

idth of 5

0' fo

r a single family hom

e. The

propo

sed plan

certainly doe

s that a

t the

street. Ho

wever tracts 3 and

4 do no

t maintain that at the

rear of tract. So do

es th

e minim

um lot w

idth only apply "street side"?

This is a good

que

stion‐ lot w

idth is m

easured at th

e rear of the

fron

t yard, which we have interpreted to be at th

e setback or build‐to zone

line

. Here is an

excerpt from our online code

(UDC

151

Definition

s):

4. Shou

ld th

e rezoning

requ

est b

e approved

by the City Cou

ncil, are th

e curren

t or future ow

ners und

er any

obligation to fo

llow th

rough with

the plan

as

subm

itted

by Ba

tes &

Associates, Inc.?

The City Attorne

y’s o

ffice has m

ade it clear that p

ropo

sed de

velopm

ent p

lans canno

t be considered

as p

art o

f a re

zoning

app

lication. Any

plans or ide

as

presen

ted or disc

ussed by

the applicant, un

less it is fo

r a Plann

ed Zon

ing District (PZD), are not tied

to th

e prop

erty.

5. The Co

mmiss

ione

rs and

Staff spoke to a con

cept of h

igh de

nsity

hou

sing closer to

high traffic zo

nes rathe

r than the op

posite. This seems c

ounter

intuitive as it p

uts m

ore resid

ents closer to the no

ise pollutio

n from

traffic. I searche

d the 20

30 Future Plan

and

cou

ldn't find that con

cept articulated

. Ca

n you po

int m

e to so

mething

that sh

ows the

con

cept as b

eing

supp

orted by

the City Cou

ncil?

We discuss c

oncepts and ideas for fu

ture develop

men

t in the Fram

ework and Guiding

Policies sectio

ns of C

ity Plan 20

30.

6. In

the 20

30 Future Plan, enacted

in 201

1, th

e op

portun

ity existed

to zo

ne all the prop

ertie

s abu

tting Crossover R

d to RSF‐8 but th

at wasn't d

one. Any

idea

what h

as changed

since then

? Shou

ld I be

dire

cting this qu

estio

n to so

meo

ne else?

I will be ho

nest, I am not fa

miliar with

that idea. It is p

ossib

le it was con

sidered

, but I have no know

ledge abou

t that.

6. The po

nd.. I realize that th

e prop

erty owne

r normally is und

er no ob

ligation to m

aintain such a fe

ature on

their p

rope

rty. I say no

rmally because it is in

the realm of p

ossib

ilitie

s that w

hen the original creation of th

e Glend

ale Ad

ditio

n it was dictated the po

nd be maintaine

d. A

re th

ere any city re

cords for

the approval of the

Glend

ale Ad

ditio

n?

I am not su

re if th

e City wou

ld have records a

bout th

at. The

subd

ivision

was platted

and

created

a long

time ago. I know

all subd

ivision

s are re

corded

with

the

Coun

ty, so I w

ould su

ggest con

tacting the Co

unty Clerk fo

r records.

7. Ru

noff.. w

hen any prop

erty is develop

ed is th

ere any part of the

permit process that a

ssesses the

impact of run

off?

We live with

signs that this w

as not

the case in

our neighbo

rhoo

d. W

ater flow

s dow

n from

Glend

ale into our cul‐de‐sac and then

on to th

e prop

ertie

s below

us. It is w

hat it is for us. I can

foresee that th

e Inwoo

d prop

ertie

s abu

tting these parcels c

ould begin to

get floo

ded.

3

I have typically not se

en stormwater m

anagem

ent b

e review

ed as p

art o

f a building pe

rmit. You

can

con

tact th

e En

gine

ering divisio

n to ask whe

n stormwater

issue

s are add

ressed

as p

art o

f develop

men

t, bu

t the

y are in m

y expe

rience typically tied

to larger develop

men

ts th

an a single‐fa

mily hom

e.

Thanks in

advance fo

r you

r tim

e.

Respectfully,

Rick Ch

urchill

1681

N Stardust Ln

Sent from

BlueM

ail

On Feb 7, 201

9, at 1

0:18

, Rick <b

ig_smile_2u@

yaho

o.com> wrote:

Harry,

Thank you for a

ckno

wledging ou

r email. W

e are plan

ning

to atten

d the he

aring.

Rick

Sent from

BlueM

ail

On Feb 7, 201

9, at 0

9:21

, "Da

vis, Harry" <

hdavis@

fayetteville‐ar.gov> wrote:

Hello,

Thank you for emailing your comments. I will be sure to include them in the report. Please consider coming to the

Planning Commission on Monday, February 11th at 5:30 PM to speak in front of the Planning Commission. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Harry Davis


RSF-4

P-1

C-2

C-1

R-O

NC

R-A

RMF-24

CS

MISSION BLVD

CROS

SOVE

RRD

STAR

R DR

LegendPlanning AreaFayetteville City LimitsShared Use Paved TrailTrail (Proposed)Building Footprint

ZoningRESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY

Residential-AgriculturalRSF-.5RSF-1RSF-2RSF-4RSF-7RSF-8RSF-18

RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILYRT-12 Residential Two and Three-familyRMF-6RMF-12RMF-18RMF-24RMF-40

INDUSTRIALI-1 Heavy Commercial and Light IndustrialI-2 General Industrial

EXTRACTIONE-1

COMMERCIALResidential-OfficeC-1C-2C-3

FORM BASED DISTRICTSDowntown CoreUrban ThoroughfareMain Street CenterDowntown GeneralCommunity ServicesNeighborhood ServicesNeighborhood Conservation

PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTSCommercial, Industrial, Residential

INSTITUTIONALP-1

One Mile ViewRZN19-6524 ROTH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, N

0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles

Planning AreaFayetteville City Limits

Subject Property

Proposed RSF-8

SETTER ST

CROS

SOVE

R RD

WHIPPOORWILL LN

POIN

TER

LN

MEANDERING WAY

STARDUST LN

BOARDWALK CT

RSF-4

C-2

RMF-24

P-1

C-1


Close Up ViewRZN19-6524 ROTH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP,

N

0 150 300 450 60075Feet

1 inch = 200 feet

Subject Property

Zoning AcresRSF-8 2.1

Total 2.1

SETTER ST

CROS

SOVE

R RD

WHIPPOORWILL LN

INWOOD LN

BOARDWALK CT

Streets ExistingMSP Class

PRINCIPAL ARTERIALTrail (Proposed)Planning AreaFayetteville City Limits

Current Land UseRZN19-6524 ROTH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LLLP N

0 110 220 330 44055Feet

Subject Property

Single-Family Residential

1 inch = 150 feet


Single-FamilyResidential

Mixed-Density Residential


CROS

SOVE

R RD

INWOOD LN

SETTER ST

LOVERS LN

GADD

Y LNAR

THUR

S CT

HUNT

ERS

RDG

WHIPPOORWILL LNPO

INTE

R LN

GLEN

BROO

K PL

MEANDERING WAY

MIST

Y LN

CHEROKEE DR

SEMI

NOLE

CT

LONDON DERRY DR

NAVAJO CT

PAWNEE CTTULIP CT

PETUNIA CT

LOVERS LN


FUTURE LAND USE 2030Residential Neighborhood AreaCity Neighborhood Area

Future Land UseRZN19-6524 ROTH FAMILY N

0 290 580 870 1,160145Feet

1 inch = 400 feet

Subject Property

Documents

Fayetteville Flyer - Budget Impact: Account Number · 2019. 3. 4. · G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6524 RZN 2827 E. Whippoorwill Ln. (Roth Family