Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 1
Well B1UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 2
Well B1MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1000
2000
3000
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 3
Well B1LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 4
Well C1UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 5
Well C1MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
25
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 6
Well C1LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 7
Well D3UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 8
Well D2MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 9
Well D1LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 10
Well E3UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 11
Well E3MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 12
Well E2LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
50
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
4
8
12
16
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 13
Well F4UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 14
Well F1MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 15
Well F2LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 16
Well G4UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 17
Well G1MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 18
Well G1LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 19
Well H1UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 20
Well H2MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 21
Well H3LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 22
Well J1UAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 23
Well J2MAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
25Be
nzoi
c A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Chl
oren
dic
Aci
d C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
40
Phen
ol C
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
5
10
15
20
Tota
l Chl
orob
enzo
ic A
cid
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Date
0
10
20
30
Tota
l Org
anic
Hal
ides
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Notes:Non-detect resultDetected result
figure 24
Well J3LAnalyte Concentration vs. Time
Third Quarter 2002Hyde Park Landfill
Niagara Falls, New York
![[ applicaTion noTe ] - Waters CorporationapplicaTion noTe] between the analytical signal and analyte concentration for all compounds. Figure 1 shows a representative calibration curve](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5acdfcb77f8b9a6a678e24a1/-application-note-waters-corporation-application-note-between-the-analytical.jpg)
![Analysis of Volatile Halogenated and Aromatic … · HP-5 and DB-FFAP columns. ... concentration of the analyte in the matrix. ... space oven zones at different temperatures [2]](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5af1bf4e7f8b9abc788ed6ea/analysis-of-volatile-halogenated-and-aromatic-and-db-ffap-columns-concentration.jpg)
![Figure 3-1 Total Suspended Solids Concentration [TSS ... · PDF fileSource: TAMS/Gradient Database TAMS/ Gradient Figure 3-1 Total Suspended Solids Concentration [TSS], Upper Hudson](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5a9da9ba7f8b9a21688d7a78/figure-3-1-total-suspended-solids-concentration-tss-tamsgradient-database.jpg)
