Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Final RFQ Evaluation Report for the project “Development of Modern Silos at 6 locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 2
Contents
1. Brief Summary of the Request for Qualification (RFQ) Process ................................................................................................ 4
2. TEST OF ELIGIBILITY and RESPONSIVENESS ............................................................................................................................. 7
2.1 Eligibility of Applicant – .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
The eligibility of the bidder has been done as per provisions of clause 2.2.1 of the RFQ document. ..................................................................... 7
2.2 Measure of responsiveness - ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
2.3 General Observation – ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Reasons of Applications declared Not eligible: ........................................................................................................................................................ 9
(i) OM METALS INFRA PROJECTS LTD AND OTHERS ........................................................................................................................................... 9
(ii) LMJ INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, MAYUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & LMJ LOGISTICS LIMITED (CONSORTIUM) ................ 11
2.5 Reasons of Non-responsiveness of the 4 Applications are given below: ............................................................................................................ 12
(i) CHICAGO CONSTRUCTION CO. AND OTHERS ................................................................................................................................................ 12
(ii) SPECTOMS ENGINEERING PVT LTD ............................................................................................................................................................... 12
(iii) SRC COMPANY INFRA PVT LTD ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13
(iv) NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED ................................................................................................................. 14
3. EVALUATION OF RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 16
3.1 Common Parameters of Evaluation – .................................................................................................................................................................. 16
3.2 Evaluation of Responsive Applications – ............................................................................................................................................................ 19
(i) SOMA PUNJAB WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED (Individual Application) ............................................................................................... 20
(ii) STAR AGRI WAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND OTHERS ............................................................... 27
(iii) LT FOODS LIMITED ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 35
(iv) ADANI AGRI LOGISTICS LIMITED ..................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 3
(v) TOTAL SHIPPING & LOGISTIC PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ............................................................................................................. 46
(vi) SRI AVANTIKA – SUDHEEKSHA (JV) ................................................................................................................................................................ 51
(vii) ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD (LM, FM AND OMM) AND ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND US (TM) .............................. 69
(viii) PRISTINE LOGISTICS & INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD. ................................................................................................................................. 74
(ix) DINESHCHANDRA R. AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT. LTD. ............................................................................................................................. 79
(x) ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD......................................................................................................................................... 89
(xi) OSR INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS ..................................................................................................................................................... 99
(xii) M/S GARWAR – ELL ESS JV ............................................................................................................................................................................. 107
(xiii) JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS .................................................................................................................................. 119
(xiv) SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LTD ................................................................................................................................................................ 125
(xv) SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT. LTD ..................................................................................................................... 139
4. CONCLUSION: ............................................................................................................................................................................... 146
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 4
1. Brief Summary of the Request for Qualification (RFQ) Process
Important Dates
a) Sale of RFQ document : 22nd
March 2015 – 2nd
June 2015
b) Pre Application Conference : 5th
May 2015
c) Last Date of Receiving Applications : 2nd
June 2015
d) Date of seeking First Clarification’s by FCI on Applications : 22nd
July 2015
e) Last date of Receiving First Clarification’s by FCI : 31st
July 2015
f) Date of seeking Second clarification’s by FCI on Applications : 25th
Aug 2015
g) Last date of Receiving Second Clarification’s by FCI : 28th
Aug 2015
Number of Applications Received : 21 nos. (Twenty One Applicants)
Name of Applicants with applied project locations
S.No. APPLICANT Number of Locations applied for
1. ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD (5)
2 ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD NARELA AND WHITEFIELD (2)
3 CHICAGO CONSTRUCTION CO INFORMATION NOT FURNISHED
4 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
5 GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE NARELA, SAHNEWAL AND CHANGSARI (3)
6 JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED NARELA (1)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 5
7 LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
8 LT FOODS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
9 NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
10 OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
11 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
12 OSR INFRA PVT. LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
13 PRISTINE LOGISTICS & INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
14 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
15 SOMA PUNJAB WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
16 SPECTOMS ENGINEERING PVT LTD INFORMATION NOT FURNISHED
17 SRC COMPANY INFRA PVT LTD WHITEFIELD (1)
18 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
19 STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
20 SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NARELA AND WHITEFIELD (2)
21 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 6
The FCI
sThe FCI Sought the clarification’s from the respective Applicants and the evaluation report has been revised based on the evaluation of
the furnished clarification by the applicants.
Review
We are listing out the following areas where deficiencies were observed and brought to notice. Hence further information need to be sought from the
applicants for clarification and justification of their candidature for the captioned project. In this connection FCI sought the clarifications from the
applicants for two times.
a) Details of applicant:
b) Technical capacity of the applicant:
c) Financial capacity of the applicant:
d) Audited Balance sheet for last five years.
e) Details of Eligible project:
f) Power of Attorney/BR for signing of Application:
g) Power of Attorney/BR for lead member of consortium:
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 7
2. TEST OF ELIGIBILITY and RESPONSIVENESS
2.1 Eligibility of Applicant –
The eligibility of the bidder has been done as per provisions of clause 2.2.1 of the RFQ document.
2.2 Measure of responsiveness -
The test of Responsiveness of Application shall be carried out as prescribed in clause 2.19.1 of the RFQ. The parameters as mentioned in the
referred clause are as below:-
(a) it is received as per format at Appendix-I;
(b) it is uploaded to Authorities web portal by the Application Due Date including any extension thereof pursuant to Clause 2.14.2;
(c) the 3 hard copies to be submitted within 3 days of Application due date is signed, sealed, bound together in hard cover, and marked as
stipulated in Clauses 2.12 and 2.13;
(d) it is accompanied by the Power of Attorney as specified in Clause 2.2.5, and in the case of a Consortium, the Power of Attorney as specified
in Clause 2.2.6 (c);
(e) it contains all the information and documents (complete in all respects) as requested in this RFQ;
(f) it contains information in formats same as those specified in this RFQ;
(g) it contains certificates from its statutory auditors$ in the formats specified at Appendix-I of the RFQ for each Eligible Project;
(h) it contains an attested copy of the receipt of the Authority towards the cost of the RFQ process as specified in Clause 1.2.1;
(i) it is accompanied by the Jt. Bidding Agreement (for Consortium), specific to the Project, as stipulated in Clause 2.2.6(g);
(j) it does not contain any condition or qualification; and
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 8
(k) it is not non-responsive in terms hereof.
Based on the above provisions and subsequent checking, the responsiveness of the 21 received applications are given below in the table
S.No. Applicant Responsiveness
1. ADANI AGRI LOGISTICS LIMITED Responsive
2. ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD Responsive
3 CHICAGO CONSTRUCTION CO AND OTHERS Non-responsive
4 DINESH CHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD Responsive
5 GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE Responsive
6 JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Responsive
7 LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD Not Eligible
8 LT FOODS LIMITED Responsive
9 NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED Non Responsive
10 OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD Not Eligible
11. ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD Responsive
12 OSR INFRA PVT. LTD Responsive
13 PRISTINE LOGISTICS & INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD Responsive
14 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED Responsive
15 SOMA PUNJAB WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED Responsive
16 SPECTOMS ENGINEERING PVT LTD Non-responsive
17 SRC COMPANY INFRA PVT LTD Non Responsive
18 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD Responsive
19 STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED Responsive
20 SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Responsive
21 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD Responsive
Note: The Table is presented in alphabetical order
From the above table, it is inferred that out of 21 applicants, 15 applicants are to be considered as responsive and out of the remaining 6, the 2 Applications
are non-eligible and 4 are classified as non-responsive applications.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 9
2.3 General Observation –
All the applicants deposited the document fees as confirmed by FCI officials.
2.4 Reasons of Applications declared Not eligible:
(i) OM METALS INFRA PROJECTS LTD AND OTHERS
The following points make the application non-responsive:-
a. The Applicant has added/deleted/modified with Appendix – I, Annexure – I, clause no. 6 Sl no. 1 and Sl no. 3 respectively.
Appendix – I, Annexure – I, clause no. 6 Sl no. 1 and Sl no. 3
No. Criteria Yes No
1. Has the Applicant/ constituent of the Consortium been barred
by the Central/ State Government, or any entity controlled by
it, from participating in any project (BOT or otherwise)?
3. Has the Applicant/ constituent of the Consortium paid
liquidated damages of more than 5% of the contract value in
a contract due to delay or has been penalised due to any
other reason in relation to execution of a contract, in the last
three years?
Appendix – I, Annexure – I, clause no. 6 Sl no. 1 and Sl no. 3 as submitted by M/s. OM Metals JV
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 10
The above change impact the provision of the Clause 2.2.7 and Clause 2.2.8 which deals with in-eligibility of Applicant to submit Application.
b. The applicant has not submitted Hard Copy of the Audited Balance of Lead Member i.e. M/s. OM Metal. The Soft Copy of the Balance Sheet is also
incomplete.
c. Further it has been observed in the Annual Financial Report of 2013-14 of M/s Veeraprabhu Marketing Limited (Consortium Member of another
applicant, M/s OM Metal & Others)has also made a non-current investment in LMJ Energy Infralogistic Ltd as well as in LMJ International Limited.
d. It is highlighted from the audited financial statements for FY 2013-14 of M/s LMJ Logistics Limited that M/s Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd (Consortium
Member of another applicant, M/s OM Metal & Others) has provided corporate guarantee against the term loan of Rs.10 crore.
e. In view of the above statements, as per provisions of clause 2.2.1 (c) (v), Conflict of Interest amongst the two Applicants viz. M/s Om Metals & Others
and others and M/s LMJ International Ltd is construed
Based on the above the application of M/s Om Metals & Others is not eligible to bid.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 11
(ii) LMJ INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, MAYUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & LMJ LOGISTICS LIMITED (CONSORTIUM)
Name of the Applicant/ Consortium Members
Shareholding Pattern of Consortium Members
1. LMJ International Limited
48%
2. Mayur Construction Company
26%
3. LMJ Logistics Limited 26%
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and
following are the observations –
a. M/s LMJ International Ltd (48%) has applied as the lead member in consortium with M/s Mayur Construction (26%) and M/s LMJ Logistics Ltd
(26%)
b. It is observed from the Audited Financial Report of 2013-14, LMJ Logistics Limited that the company has made a non-current investment in LMJ
Energy Infralogistic Ltd.
c. Further it has been observed in the Annual Financial Report of 2013-14 of M/s Veeraprabhu Marketing Limited (Consortium Member of another
applicant, M/s OM Metal & Others)has also made a non-current investment in LMJ Energy Infralogistic Ltd as well as in LMJ International
Limited.
d. It is highlighted from the audited financial statements for FY 2013-14 of M/s LMJ Logistics Limited that M/s Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd
(Consortium Member of another applicant, M/s OM Metal & Others) has provided corporate guarantee against the term loan of Rs.10 crore.
Please note that the M/s LMJ Logistics Limited is consortium member in one of the applicant consortium led by M/s LMJ International Limited.
M/s LMJ Logistics has other investments non trade (unquoted) investment in equity instruments (fully paid up) in LMJ Energy Infralogistics
Limited. A similar type of investment in LMJ Energy in LMJ Energy Infralogistics Limited is observed in the balance sheet of M/s Veerprabhu
Marketing Ltd (Consortium Member of another applicant, M/s OM Metal & Others).
e. In view of the above statements, as per provisions of clause 2.2.1 (c) (v), Conflict of Interest amongst the two Applicants viz. M/s LMJ
International Ltd and others and M/s Om Metals & Others is construed.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 12
As per provisions of clause 2.2.1, to the best of our knowledge, the Applicant M/s LMJ International & Others as well as M/s OM metals &
others are in-eligible for prequalification and hence both the applications could not be evaluated further.
2.5 Reasons of Non-responsiveness of the 4 Applications are given below:
(i) CHICAGO CONSTRUCTION CO. AND OTHERS
The following points make the application non-responsive:-
a. The Applicant has not uploaded the application in Appendix – I (refer clause 2.13.2) and it’s Annexures. (The Application)
b. The Applicant has not uploaded the application in Appendix – II (refer clause 2.13.5), Appendix – III (refer clause 2.13.5), Appendix – IV (refer clause
2.13.2)
The applicant has not submitted the application form pertaining to technical experience; hence the application could not be evaluated further.
Based on the above the application of M/s Chicago Construction Co and Others is non-responsive in pursuance to clause 2.19 of the RFQ.
(ii) SPECTOMS ENGINEERING PVT LTD
The following points make the application non-responsive:-
a. The Applicant has not uploaded the application in Appendix – I (refer clause 2.13.2) and all its Annexures. (The Application)
b. The Applicant has not uploaded the application in Appendix – II (refer clause 2.13.5)
c. The uploaded POA documents are not as per the stipulation of the RFQ clauses.
d. The net worth of applicant is Rs.1.67 crore as on 31st March 2014 ( based on the submitted financials for FY13-14), which is not meeting the
minimum financial capacity criteria.
e. The Applicant hard copy of the Application has not been received as per provisions of clause 2.12.2
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 13
The applicant has not submitted the application form pertaining to technical experience; hence the application could be evaluated further.
Based on the above the application of M/s Spectoms Engineering Pvt Ltd is non-responsive in pursuance to clause 2.19 of the RFQ.
(iii) SRC COMPANY INFRA PVT LTD
The following points make the application non-responsive:-
a. The Applicant has not uploaded the Annex V ( Statement of Legal Capacity) of Appendix – I (refer clause 2.13.2)
b. The applicant net worth is Rs.7.45 crore as on 31st March 2014 (calculated from the submitted audited financial statements of FY 13-14), which is
less than the minimum net required net worth of Rs.8.00 crore. Therefore the applicant is not meeting the minimum financial capacity eligibility
criteria. However the applicant has stated net worth certificate of Rs.13.51 crore in Annex – III of Appendix – I.
Based on the above the application of M/s SRC Company Infra Pvt Ltd is non-responsive in pursuance to clause 2.19 of the RFQ.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 14
(iv) NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED
The following points make the application non-responsive:-
a. The Applicant has not uploaded the application in Appendix – I (refer clause 2.13.2) Annex III (Financial capacity format) and Appendix – I (refer
clause 2.13.2) Annex V ( Statement of Legal Capacity).
b. The applicant’s net worth is Rs.178.66 crore as on 31st March 2014 and able to meet the minimum financial capacity criteria for all the applied project
locations.
c. The applicant stated in the certificate that the applicant’s incurred Rs.132.86 crore of capital expenditure in one eligible project but included
Rs.80.43 crore of FY14-15, which is outside the eligible period i.e. FY 09-10 to FY 13-14.
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs
in crore) Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant / Member of Consortium & Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments
made/ receive
d for construction of Eligible Project
s in Categor
ies 3 and 4
Payments made
for development of Eligible Projects
in Categori
es 1 and 2
Revenues
appropriated from
Eligible Projects
in Categor
ies 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible & Comments on Appendix - I submitted by Applicant
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 15
1
National Collateral Management Services Limited and Project Name not given
A 3 132.86
0 0.000 0.000
132.860
99.645
Provided the statutory auditors certificate for PPP projects but shown the category 3 but included the Rs.80.43 crore of FY 2014-15.
Yes Claimed the exp in category 3 factoring the construction experience in warehousing domain
52.43 52.43
39.32
Unable to meet the minimum thresh hold technical Capacity criteria considering the audited financial statements only from FY 2009-14
Total (Rs. In crore)
132.860
99.645 52.43
39.32
Based on the above the application of M/s National Collateral Management Services Limited is non-responsive in pursuance to clause 2.19 of the RFQ
and also not meeting the threshold technical capacity criteria.
Recommendations -
Based on the above and to the best of our knowledge and in pursuance of clause 2.2.1 and 2.19 all the 6 Applications may be rejected based on
reasons stated above.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 16
3. EVALUATION OF RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS
3.1 Common Parameters of Evaluation –
The basic evaluation principle adopted as common parameters for evaluation as laid down in various clause of the RFP is as presented below –
1. For purpose of evaluation, the original (uploaded to the web portal on or before RFQ due date) application shall prevail over the copy of the original
application in pursuance of the clause 2.12.2 of the RFQ document. Therefore based on the aforesaid clause, we have evaluated the applications
based on the uploaded Original copy shared by the FCI as a principal document over the shared hard copy of the original.
2. Applicant, its Member or Associate (or any constituent thereof) and any other Applicant, its Member or Associate (or any constituent thereof) should
not have Conflict of Interest in pursuance of 2.2.1 (c), such Applications shall not eligible to apply.
3. The Applicant shall fulfil Threshold Technical Capacity for the project applied for. In case the Applicant applies for multiple projects the applicant shall
qualify for all projects that he has applied for, which has lesser prescribed Threshold Technical Capacity than the Highest Threshold Technical
Capacity of project he is eligible to apply for, in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A)
4. The Applicant shall fulfill Financial Capacity by displaying a Net Worth of 25% of the Indicative Project Cost mentioned in the RFQ. In case the
Applicant has applied for more than 1 project the Applicant shall have to display a Net Worth of 25% of the Sum of Indicative Project Cost of all the
projects applied for in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (B).
5. As per the Companies Act 2013, the net worth definition
“Net worth means the aggregate value of the paid-up share capital and all reserves created out of the profits and securities premium account, after deducting the aggregate value of the accumulated losses, deferred expenditure and miscellaneous expenditure not written off, as per the audited balance sheet, but does not include reserves created out of revaluation of assets, write-back of depreciation and amalgamation”
As per the RFQ, the net worth definition
“Net worth (the "Net Worth") shall mean the sum of subscribed and paid up equity and reserves from which shall be deducted the
sum of revaluation reserves, miscellaneous expenditure not written off and reserves not available for distribution to equity
shareholders”
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 17
As per sec 52 of the Companies Act 2013
Where a company issues shares at a premium, whether for cash or otherwise, a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the premium received on those shares shall be transferred to a “securities premium account” and the provisions of this Act relating to reduction of share capital of a company shall, except as provided in this section, apply as if the securities premium account were the paid-up share capital of the company.
2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the securities premium account may be applied by the company— (a) towards the issue of unissued shares of the company to the members of the company as fully paid bonus shares;
(b) in writing off the preliminary expenses of the company; (c) in writing off the expenses of, or the commission paid or discount allowed on, any issue of shares or debentures of the company; (d) in providing for the premium payable on the redemption of any redeemable preference shares or of any debentures of the company; or (e) for the purchase of its own shares or other securities under section 68. (3) The securities premium account may, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), be applied by such class of companies, as may be prescribed and whose financial statement comply with the accounting standards prescribed for such class of companies under section 133 :— (a) in paying up unissued equity shares of the company to be issued to members of the company as fully paid bonus shares; or (b) in writing off the expenses of or the commission paid or discount allowed on any issue of equity shares of the company; or (c) for the purchase of its own shares or other securities under section 68. As per the definition of Company’s Act 2013, the share premium account should be part of net worth. However the definition of the net worth as per the issued RFQ document, the net worth estimation shall exclude the revaluation reserves, miscellaneous expenditure not written off and reserves not available for distribution to equity shareholders. Hence as per Companies Act regarding uses of share premium account and the definition of the net worth, the share premium account shall be considered as part of net worth unless the same has been deducted considering as reserves not available for distribution to equity shareholders.
6. For purpose of any Application latest financial shall be Financial Year 2013-2014 in case of entities finalizing there Accounts under Indian Law. For
Applicant finalizing there Accounts under Foreign Law the standards adopted by the Country where the Applicant is incorporated shall be adopted.
This is in pursuance with 2.2.12
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 18
7. Projects eligible as per clause 3.2.1 has only be considered for evaluation. Further, the eligibility has be vetted against clause 3.2.3 and 3.2.4
8. Experience score has been calculated as per provisions of clause 3.2.6 Table 3.2.6. For projects situated in developed countries which are member
of OEDC has been multiplied by factor 0.50 in pursuance of clause 3.2.7
9. In case of Consortium credentials of members with proposed stake of at least 26% subjected to a max of 4 members has been evaluated in
pursuance of clause 2.2.2 and 2.2.6.
10. In cases where the experience has been claimed before Start date or after End date of project as declared by applicant in Annexure – IV, Appendix –
I, Authority at its discretion may sought clarification in form of Certificate from client attested by Statutory Auditor if such experience may be
considered under the provisions of the Concession/Development/Contract Agreement under which the project has been executed and also the copy
of the agreement need to be called for review.
The clarification’s sought from the respective applicants in this regard and evaluated the application based on the Clarification’s
furnished by the applicants.
The Threshold Technical Capacity evaluated and Experience Score of Applicant is finalized based on clarification furnished and in
accordance to various clause of the RFQ.
Further, in pursuance of clause 2.2.12 of the RFQ only experience b/w FY 2009-10 and 2013-14 has been and shall be considered for evaluation.
11. Category - 1 projects as defined in clause 3.2.1 are projects in Warehousing/Storage sector and further as per Clause 3.2.3 a it should have been
executed in PPP mode. Further as per 3.2.3 d (ii) to consider the revenue appropriated the revenues from users availing of non-discriminatory access
to project fixed asset or revenue from user’s use of project fixed asset. However revenue from sale or provision of goods or services, fare/freight
charges, and other income of the company owning the Project.
Warehousing/Storage Sector in additions to use of Project Fixed Asset for Storage of Materials includes activities like loading / unloading, stacking of
goods, keeping inventory of goods, security arrangement, providing insurance cover, etc. and hence is under the umbrella of service sector and
therefore its revenue is from providing services as a whole and as per clause 3.2.3 d (ii) revenue from services shall not been be considered for the
purpose of this RFQ.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 19
Further, in cases where it can be identified without reasonable doubt that the revenue is purely rent revenue for providing a
shed/structure/building/infrastructure for carrying out warehousing/storage activities, such revenue has been considered provided such revenue has
been appropriated b/w FY 2009-10 and 2013-14 in pursuance of clause 2.2.12.
However to clarify the above issue pertaining to eligibility of warehouse revenues as a eligible project, a meeting was held with FCI officials (
Chaired by ED Silos, FCI) dated 29th June 2015 and it was clarified by the FCI officials that the revenues from warehousing sector shall be
considered as eligible component factoring the similar nature of the storage project and the revenue’s generated over the years from the creation
of the fixed project assets in form of storage facility
12. Each application individually and jointly (to ascertain conflict of interest) has been evaluated under all applicable clauses of the RFQ document.
13. The evaluation of responsive Applications have been done in random basis without following any order and no preference has been given to any
application.
14. For all the 6 locations for which the RFQ has been floated separate rank has been given to each Application based on the merit of the application.
The key eligibility requirement of each project is as per Table A 1.
Table – A 1 (Rs. in crore)
S.No Locations with Capacity Total Project Cost Minimum Thresh Technical
Capacity Financial Capacity
Individual Project Cost (10% of the threshold technical capacity)
1 Kotakapura (25000MT) 34.00 68.00 8.50 6.80
2 Sahnewal (50000MT) 45.00 90.00 11.25 9.00
3 Narela (50000MT) 46.00 92.00 11.50 9.20
4 Kathiar (50000MT) 45.00 90.00 11.25 9.00
5 Changsari (50000MT) 47.00 94.00 11.75 9.40
6 Whitefield (25000MT) 32.00 64.00 8.00 6.40
3.2 Evaluation of Responsive Applications –
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 20
(i) SOMA PUNJAB WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED (Individual Application)
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 1.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Katihsar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs.62.25 crore and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
crore.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed that the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted ( NEFT HDFC Bank) (Page 1)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 3 to Page 6)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 7 to Page 9)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 113 to Page 134)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of NA ( Page 9)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 21
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 10)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 11 to page 12)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years from (FY14-15 ( unaudited) to FY10-11) Page 27 to 111) audited from FY13-14 to FY10-11
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for FY 14-15 (Page 23). No considered beyond FY13-14
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 13 to page 22)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for. (Page 18 to Page 22)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 24 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted (Page 136 to 138). BR not submitted
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11 Appendix V Guidelines of the Department of Disinvestment
12. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
13. Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 1.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 22
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March
2014 (Rs. in crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 SPWPL -3.41 Submitted for FY 14-15
1. The net worth calculation provided by Statutory Auditor is based on unaudited figures of FY 14-15 and hence not considered. 2. FY 13-14 Net Worth calculated from balance sheet has been presented. Also the applicant has submitted the financial statements from FY2010 to 2015 (unaudited).
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Soma Punjab is negative and is not meeting the Financial Capacity for any one of the
locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The Applicant has failed to display Financial Capacity for any one of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination and the
Threshold Technical Capacity need not be evaluated. However the detail of technical experience submitted by the applicant is given below:
Table 1.3
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant
(Rs in crore) Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 23
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments
made/ receive
d for construction
of Eligible Project
s in Categories 3 and 4
Payments
made for
development
of Eligible Project
s in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues
appropriated from
Eligible Project
s in Categories 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible & Comments on Appendix - I submitted by Applicant
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
SPWL & Agri Warehouse of 46.7 Th MT in Tapa Mandi, under PEG scheme
a 1 17.88 6.37 24.25
30.31
1. The capital cost of all the 5 projects as certified by Statutory Auditor is more than 10% of the Threshold Capacity (TC) required by applicant as per provisions of clause 2.2.2(A) of RFQ and in
As per auditor's certificate the all the 5 projects are constructed and / or owned by the applicant Clarific
As per Annexure - IV, Appendix I all projects are under 10 years PEG scheme of FCI & Pungrain. Documentary Evidenc
0.00 0.00 0 0
2
SPWL & Agri Warehouse of 78.37 Th MT in Muktsar-II, under PEG scheme
b 1 39.43 11.16 50.59
63.24 0.00 0.00 0 0
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 24
3
SPWL & Agri Warehouse of 144 Th MT in Muktsar-I, under PEG scheme
c 1 69.82 4.96 74.78
93.48
agreement to the provision of clause 3.2.3 (c) of RFQ and hence is a eligible project subject to fulfilment of other provisions of RFQ 2. It is not clear from Appendix I, Annex - IV and from Statutory Auditors Certificate the Financial Years in which the Construction expenses were made. Clarification may be sought for. 3. It is not clear from Appendix I, Annex - IV and from Statutory Auditors Certificate the
ation regarding the above situation may be sought for
e such as PEG agreement b/w the part is required for confirmation of the same Client Certificate is also required
0.00 0.00 0 0
4
SPWL & Agri Warehouse of 197.5 Th MT in Malout, under PEG scheme
d 1 96.32 8.01 104.33
130.41
0.00 0.00 0 0
5
SPWL & Agri Warehouse of 197.5 Th MT in Patti, under PEG scheme
e 1 132.92 5.56 138.48
173.10
0.00 0.00 0 0
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 25
Financial Years in which the revenue were appropriated. Clarification may be sought for. It is not clear from the balance sheet provided the source of these revenue. Client Certification and Agreement is required for clarity.
Total (Rs. In crore)
392.43
490.54
0.00
0.00
Score shall be considered for projects at Kotkapura & Whitefield
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 26
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ, the Applicant may not be considered for pre-qualification for any location.
Table – 1.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
2 Sahnewal 90.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
3 Narela 92.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
4 Kathiar 90.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
5 Changsari 94.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
6 Whitefield 64.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
FINAL STATUS: NOT ELIGIBLE (Not meeting the financial capacity criteria)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 27
(ii) STAR AGRI WAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND OTHERS
The applicant has submitted the application in form of consortium.
Name of the Applicant/ Consortium Members Shareholding Pattern of Consortium Members
1. Star Agri Warehousing and Collateral Management Limited 74%
2. Central Railside Warehouse Company (CRWCL) 26%
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 2.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed, to the best of our knowledge so far, that the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 28
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted ( SBI Bank) (Page 5)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 6 to Page 8)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 127 to Page 330)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration Submitted ( Page 9 and 10 for both the parties)
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 11 to page 16)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 17, 21 and 22)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years audited financial statements from ( FY09-10 to FY13-14) Page 331 to 598)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for both members for FY 13-14 (Page 19 to 20)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page23 to page 45)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for. (Page 24 to Page 45)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Submitted by Company secretary Page 25
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 46 to 52 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted POA and BR (Page 53 to page 77)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 78 to page 95 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 96 to page 125)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12. Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 29
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 2.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March
2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 M/s Star Agri 85.99 Present 1.Share Holding proposed in Consortium 26%Share 2.Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
2 M/s CRWCL 92.37 Present 1.Share Holding proposed in Consortium 26% share 2.Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
3 Jointly 178.36
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Star Agriwarehousing & others is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all of
the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below:
Table 2.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 30
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC
Experience Score**
Check on project is eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Star Agri & Kota Silo Project
1a 3 10.34 10.34 7.76 Yes Yes Yes, Category 3
0 0 0.00
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered (Not considered for FY 14-15) 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered. The mentioned experience is for FY 14-15
2
Star Agri & Bikaner Warehouse
1b 3 10.13 10.130 7.598 Yes Yes Yes, Category 3
0 0 0.00
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered. (Not considered for FY 14-15) 2. 10% of TTC as
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 31
per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered
3
Star Agri & Jodhpur Warehouse
1c 3 10.71 10.710 5.355 Yes Yes Yes, Category 3
0 0 0.00
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered. (Not considered for FY 14-15) 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered
4
Star Agri & Kota Warehouse
1d 3 8.84 8.840 4.420 Yes Yes Yes, Category 3
7.23 7.23 5.42
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered (Not considered for FY 14-15) 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered
5 CRWCL & Korukkupet I & II
2a 1 15.22 22.5 37.72 47.15
Ye
s
Ye
s,
can
be
con
sid
ere
d u
nd
er
Cate
go
ry 3
. N
ot
elig
ible
15.22 15.22 11.42
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered. 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered
6
CRWCL & Pune Railside Warehouse
2b 1 12.38 35.19 47.57 59.46 12.38 12.38 9.29
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 32
7
CRWCL & Dankuni Railside Warehouse
2c 1 9.19 6.74 15.93 19.91
Ye
s
9.19 9.19 6.89
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered 3. Cannot be considered for Changsari and Narela
8
CRWCL & Dehri-on-sone Railside Warehouse
2d 1 7.13 11.32 18.45 23.06
7.13 7.13 5.35
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered 3. For Kotkapura and Whitefield only
9
CRWCL & Jogeshwari Railside Warehouse
2e 1 6.79 0.00 6.79 8.48 6.79 6.79 5.09
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered 3. For Kotkapura and Whitefield only
10
CRWCL & Mysore Railside Warehouse
2f 1 6.87 2.54 9.41 11.76 6.87 6.87 5.15
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered 3. For Kotkapura and Whitefield only
11
CRWCL & Hatia Railside Warehouse
2g 1 6.67 0.73 7.40 9.25
6.67 6.67 5.00
1. Figures of b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 considered 2. 10% of TTC as per clause 3.2.3 c or 3.2.4 considered 3. For Whitefield only
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 33
Total (Rs. In crore)
36.79 27.59 FOR ALL OTHER SITES
Total (Rs. In crore)
27.60 20.70 FOR CHANGSARI and NARELA ONLY
Total (Rs. In crore)
64.81 48.61 FOR KOTKAPURA ONLY
Total (Rs. In crore)
183.29 204.22 71.48 53.61 FOR WHITEFIELD ONLY
**Experience Score has no unit
***Revenues are not considered project no 5 to no 11 considering the correction in the category of the projects from 1&2 to 3. The revenues are not
applicable in case of non PPP projects.
It is observed from the above table that M/s Star Agri warehousing & others meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for Whitefield only as per
provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification for Whitefield location only.
.Table – 2.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 64.81 no N.A.
2 Sahnewal 90.00 36.79 no N.A.
3 Narela 92.00 27.60 no N.A.
4 Kathiar 90.00 36.79 no N.A.
5 Changsari 94.00 27.60 no N.A.
6 Whitefield 64.00 71.48 yes 53.61
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 34
Clarifications sought:
1. The Statutory Certificate for net worth is not matching with the audited financial statements submitted by your company therefore clarification needs to be furnished by you so as to ascertain the figures of Statutory Certificate for both the consortium members.
Clarifications furnished
1. The applicant vide letter dated 31st July 2015 has furnished the clarification that the statutory auditors of both the companies have not considered
the security premium as part of net worth which is as per the methodology defined in the RFQ document for net worth calculation.
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 35
(iii) LT FOODS LIMITED
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 3.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
crore.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed, that declaration regarding non-performance material or contractual has not been disclosed as per sl no. 7 of Annex – I of
Appendix – I and the same may be sought for. However, in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, the Application is eligible for
evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 3)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 4 to Page 5)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 36
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 41 to Page 86)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Not Submitted
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 6)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 7 to 8)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted the five years balance sheet and P/L account for FY 2009 to FY 2014 (Page 11 to 20) repeated from Page 31 to 40. Not submitted the detailed financial statements.
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for FY 13-14 (Page 9 to 10)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page21 to page 29)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for. (Page 21 to Page 29)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 30 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted PoA and BR (Page 87 to page 89)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11 Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 3.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 37
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 LTFL 274.97 Present
1. The net worth calculation provided by Statutory Auditor is as per RFP document. 2. The Subscribed and paid up equity & reserves considered for calculation is as per the Audited Balance Sheet of FY 13-14 3. The reserve calculated is as per balance sheet of FY 13-14, however there is a minor discrepancy amounting to Rs 37,000 (thirty seven thousand).
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s LT FOODS LIMITED is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all of the
locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 3.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score**
Check on project is eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 38
Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Categories 3 and 4
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 LTFL & STORAGE SILO
a 1 36.52 22.47 58.99 73.74 yes yes yes 24.66 12.21 36.87 46.09
1. Capital Expenditure as per Auditors Certificate b/w FY 09-10 and 13-14. Beyond the stipulated period revenues shall not be considered
2 LTFL & STORAGE SILO
b 1 17.51 17.51 21.89 yes yes yes 0 0 0 0
1. No cost incurred b/w FY 09-10 and 13-14. Beyond the stipulated period revenues shall not be considered
3
LTFL & WHEAT STORAGE SILO
c 1 18.14 18.14 22.68 yes yes yes 0 0 0 0
1. No cost incurred b/w FY 09-10 and 13-14. Beyond the stipulated period revenues shall not be considered
4
LTFL & GRAIN STORAGE SILO
d 3 7.42 7.42 5.57 yes yes yes 7.42 7.42 5.57
1. Only meets 10% of TTC for Whitefield and Kotakapura. Beyond the stipulated period revenues shall not be considered
5 Total (Rs. In crore)
36.87 46.09 For all Other Sites
6 Total (Rs. In crore)
102.06 123.87 44.29 51.65 For Kotakapura & Whitefield only
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 39
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s LT FOODS LIMITED do not meet the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the project location
applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant may not be considered for pre-qualification based on the reason cited above.
Table – 3.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 44.29 no N.A.
2 Sahnewal 90.00 36.87 no N.A.
3 Narela 92.00 36.87 no N.A.
4 Kathiar 90.00 36.87 no N.A.
5 Changsari 94.00 36.87 no N.A.
6 Whitefield 64.00 44.29 no N.A.
FINAL STATUS: NOT ELIGIBE (Not meeting the technical capacity criteria of the RFQ document)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 40
(iv) ADANI AGRI LOGISTICS LIMITED
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 4.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs. 50.50 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 92.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed. However, in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 6)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 2 to Page 5)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 7 to Page 8)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 151 to Page 195)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of NA
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 9)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 41
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 10)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted the audited financial statements for FY 2009 to FY 2014 (Page17 to 149).
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor as on 31st March 2014 (Page 16)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 11)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor (Page 15)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 12 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted PoA only. (Page 13 to page 14). BR not submitted
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below:
Table 4.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March 2014
(Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 42
1 AALL 69.67 Present
1. The net worth calculation provided by Statutory Auditor is as per RFP document. 2. The Subscribed and paid up equity considered and reserves considered for calculation is as per the Audited Balance Sheet of FY 13-14
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s ADANI AGRI LOGISTIC LIMITED is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for
all of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below:
Table 4.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Check for Project Eligibility
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC
Experience Score
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 43
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
AALL & Bulk Food Grain Handling, Storage and Transportation under BOO arrangement for FCI
a 1 122.75 459.27 582.02 727.53 yes yes
No, category revised
to 3
122.75 0.00 122.75
92.06
1. The Capital cost incurred as claimed by applicant b/w FY 09-10 and FY 13-14 has not been considered since Project commissioning date is June 2008. Based on the second clarifications sought by the authority from the applicant, the applicant has submitted the copy of the supplementary agreement along with the previous agreement. Based on the terms of supplementary agreement submitted and statutory certification, the capital expenditure in the project is Rs.122.75 crore, therefore considering the same. However the project is not implemented on PPP mode as confirmed from the submitted copy of the agreements, hence the claimed project category 1 revised to project category 3 For category 3 projects, the
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 44
revenues shall not be considered.
2 Total (Rs. In crore)
582.02 727.53 122.75
92.06
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s ADANI AGRI LOGISTICS LIMITED meeting the Technical Threshold Capacity as per provisions of clause
2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ.
For capital cost consideration, further details of signed agreement between the applicant and client related to the aforesaid project need to be
furnished by the applicant to assess the eligibility of capital investment after project commissioning date.
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification subject to clarification.
Table – 4.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 122.75 Yes 92.06
2 Sahnewal 90.00 122.75 Yes 92.06
3 Narela 92.00 122.75 Yes 92.06
4 Kathiar 90.00 122.75 Yes 92.06
5 Whitefield 64.00 122.75 Yes 92.06
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 45
First Clarifications sought:
1. The submitted POA has not been supported by Board Resolution.
2. Clarification is required with respect to the capital expenditure incurred for the mentioned project in the Agreement with the client to ascertain the capital expenditure in the project after project commissioning date
First Clarifications furnished:
1. The applicant vide letter dated 28th July 2015 has submitted the Board Resolution in support of PoA.
2. The applicant has not submitted the signed agreement with the client to ascertain that the capital expenditure is permissible in the project after project
commissioning date. Therefore, from the submitted documents, it is not possible to derive the conclusion regarding the capital expenditure on the same.
Therefore the authority may seek clarifications from the applicant.
Second Clarifications Sought:
1. Kindly furnish the copy of the contract/concession/charter agreement for the mentioned project (project code 1 a in annex IV of Appendix) executed
between entity (project owner) and applicant. Please furnish all the relevant documents pertaining to the executed agreement.
Second Clarifications furnished: The applicant vide letter dated 28th August 2015 has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s
1. The copy of signed agreement with the Authority along with supplementary agreement executed with the authority. The observations on the same
are given below:
a) The category of the project has been revised from 1 to 3 after examination of the submitted copy of the agreement. The project was not
implemented on PPP mode and it is not the concession agreement signed with the authority as claimed by the applicant in their second
clarification. Hence based on above, the revenues shall not be considered for category 3 projects.
b) Based on the supplementary agreement submitted, the capital expenditure of Rs.122.75 cr incurred on the project may be considered and also
the same was certified by statutory auditor of the applicant.
Therefore based on the above clarification’s, the applicant is able to meet the technical capacity as per the provisions of the RFQ document
FINAL STATUS: Pre Qualified (Meeting the financial and technical capacity criteria)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 46
(v) TOTAL SHIPPING & LOGISTIC PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 5.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed, that declaration regarding non-performance material or contractual has not been disclosed as per sl no. 7 of Annex – I of
Appendix – I and the same may be sought for. However, in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, to the best of our knowledge so far,
the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 27)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 5 to Page 12)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted by all three members (Page 329 to Page 407)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 47
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Not Submitted by any member
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 13)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 14)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years by all three members from (FY09-10 unaudited to FY13-14) Page 61 to 328)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditors for all three members as on 31
st March
2014 (Page 15 to 17)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page18 to page 24)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for. (Page 19 to 24)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page25)
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted POA and BR (Page 29 to page 51)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 52 to page 53 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 54 to page 58)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12. Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 5.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 48
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March 2014
(Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 TSLPL 9.66 Present Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
2 BLA Power 154.18 Present Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
3 Surat Goods Transport 77.46 Present Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
241.3
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Total Shipping & Logistic Private Limited and Others is positive and is meeting the
Financial Capacity for all of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 5.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categ
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categorie
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Cat
TTC Experience Score
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 49
ories 3 and 4
in Categories 1 and 2
s 1 and 2
egories 1 and 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Total Shipping & logistics Private Limited - Warehousing & Storage-PPP Project
1a 1 14.85
14.85 18.56 Yes Yes Yes 0.00 0.00 0.00
1. Figures Pertaining to FY14-15 and hence not admissible
2
BLA Power Private Limited- Core Sector-Power Project
2a 4 618.89 618.89 309.45 Yes Yes Yes 618.89 618.89 309.45
3
Surat Goods Transport Private Limited - Core Sector - Power Project
3a 4 3.81 3.81 1.91 Yes Yes Yes 3.81 3.81 1.91
5 Total (Rs. In crore)
637.55 329.91 622.70 311.35
**Experience Score has no unit
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 50
It is observed from the above table that M/s Total Shipping & Logistic Private Limited and Others meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of
the project location applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be considered for pre-qualification subject to the clarification regarding non-
performance declaration.
Table – 5.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
2 Sahnewal 90.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
3 Narela 92.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
4 Kathiar 90.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
5 Changsari 94.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
6 Whitefield 64.00 622.70 Yes 311.45
Clarifications sought:
1. The applicant has not furnished the non- performance declaration for all three members of consortium.
Clarification Furnished: The applicant vide letter dated 26th
August 2015 has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s:
1. Submitted the declaration regarding non-performance by all three members of consortium
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 51
(vi) SRI AVANTIKA – SUDHEEKSHA (JV)
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 6.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Narela
2 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 19.50 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 92.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed, that declaration regarding non-performance material or contractual has not been disclosed as per sl no. 7 of Annex – I of
Appendix – I and the same may be sought for. However, in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, to the best of our knowledge so far,
the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page )
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 3 to Page 5)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 7 to Page 16)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted for Avantika (Page 20 to Page 60)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Not Submitted by any member
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 52
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 62)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 64)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years for M/s Avantika (FY09-10 to FY13-14) (Page 66 to 262 )
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net worth Submitted by statutory auditor for M/s Avantika Contractor as on 31
st
March 2014 (Page 65)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 290 to page 349)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor (Page290 to 349)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 351 and 352)
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted PoA (Page 354 to page 355). BR not submitted
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 357 to page 358 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 360 to page 363)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 6.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March 2014
(Rs. In crore) Statutory Certification Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 53
1 Sudheeksha (LM) 0 NO
1. No supporting document provided. No Financial Capacity has been claimed 2. Partnership Firm incorporated in 22nd May 2015
2 Avantika (FM + TM) 91.07 Yes
1. The net worth calculation provided by Statutory Auditor is as per RFP document and also reflects in the Audited Balance Sheet of 2013-14
3 Jointly 91.07
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Sri Avantika – Sudheeksha (JV) is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all
of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 6.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 54
S.No. Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC
Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC
Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5.00 6 7 8.00 9.0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 AVANTIKA & Construction of Tunnel
a 4 138.4
9 138.49
69.25
Yes Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by Sabir-Sew-Prasad JV and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said JV document from the JV
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 55
regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant shall also need review.
2
AVANTIKA & Construction road at Hydle Power Project
b 4 124.0
5 124.05
62.03
Yes Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is Abir Infrastructure Pvt Limited, and the Project is 1200 MW Teesta Stage -III HE Project which is a core sector project in Power and not in roads as mentioned in the certificate.
3
AVANTIKA & Strengthening of Runway at Agartala Airport
c 4 34.55
34.55
17.28
Yes Yes Yes 10.10
10.1
5.05
1. Revenue for year 09-10 till 13-14 considered to arrive at corrected score
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 56
4
AVANTIKA & Strengthening extension of Runway at Vijaywada Airport
d 4 46.51
46.51
23.26
Yes Yes Yes 37.99
37.99
19.00
1. Revenue for year 09-10 till 13-14 considered to arrive at corrected score
5
AVANTIKA & Improvement of Sopore Bandipore Road
e 4 33.24
33.24
16.62
Yes Yes Yes 33.24
33.24
16.62
6
AVANTIKA & Strengthening of NH - 39 at Manipur
f 4 29.88
29.88
14.94
Yes Yes Yes 29.88
29.88 14.94
7
AVANTIKA & Construction of Tunnel for HNSS Irrigation Project Pk 6
g 4 26.00
26.00
13.00
Yes Yes Yes 11.44
11.44 5.72
8
AVANTIKA & Construction of Tunnel for HNSS Irrigation Project Pk 10
h 4 20.90
20.90
10.45
Yes Yes Yes 12.42
12.42 6.21
9
AVANTIKA & Construction of Tunnel for HNSS Irrigation Project Pk 15
i 4 20.64
20.64
10.32
Yes Yes Yes 7.02
7.02 3.51
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 57
10
Package No. 06/06: Earthwork excavation of GNSS Main canal from KM 161.250 to KM 203.850 including CM & CD Works
j 4 21.69
21.69
10.85
Yes Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by Sabir Dam & Waterworks Construction Company and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said project company document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant from the project company shall also need a review.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 58
11
Sri Narasimharaya Sagar Dam: Investigation, designing and construction of dam with a live storage of 10.29 TMC of F.R.L (+) 261 M with over flow arrangements to discharge 848cumecs of surplus water, in take canal with a flood flow discharge of 140.45 cumecs and an outlet arrangements for a discharge pf 67.96 cumecs to connect SRBC
k 4 176.2
5 176.25
88.13
Yes Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by Sabir-Sew-Prasad JV and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said JV document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant shall also need a review.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 59
12
Indira Sagar Lift Irrigation Project (Polavaram): Package 21: Laying of pressure mains from koya madaram to peda vagu project including surge protection against transient, out fall structure at peda vagu project, approach channel at koya madaram, improvements to existing peda vagu project and construction of distributory syatem for irrigation an Ayacut of 7929 Acres including CM & CD works
l 4 142.8
6 142.86
71.43
Yes Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by ZVSTROY-GDCL JV and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said JV document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant shall also need a review.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 60
13
Indira Sagar Lift Irrigation Project (Polavaram): Package 22: Laying of pressure mains frompeda vagu to Bandarugudem tank including surge protection against transient, formation of New tank at Bandarugudem and out fall structure, construction of staff quarters at peda vagu project at koya madaram and at bandarugudem and construction of distributory system for irrigation and Ayacut of 12000 Acres including CM & CD works
m 4 341.1
6 341.16
170.58
Yes Yes 0
0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by ZVSTROY-GDCL JV and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said JV document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant shall also need a review.
14
Construction of Storm Water Drainage for Imphal City under of JNNURM
n 4 61.67
61.67
30.84
Yes Yes Yes 0 0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 61
the applicant was engaged by ZVSTROY-GDCL JV and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said JV document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant shall also need a review.
15
Construction of Inter State Bus Terminus at Dewlahland, Imphal, Manipur
o 4 24.46
24.46
12.23
Yes Yes Yes 24.46
24.46 12.23
16 Township site levelling package for Barh STPP
p 4 24.18
24.18
12.09
No Yes No 0.00
0 0.00
1. This project only includes leveling of land, i.e. earth work and cannot be classified under Infrastructure Project
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 62
17
Site levelling works for balance area of plant & township package for Barh STPP - Stage - II (2x660 MW)
q 4 39.76
39.76
19.88
No Yes No 0.00
0 0.00
1. This project only includes leveling of land, i.e. earth work and cannot be classified under Infrastructure Project
18
Civil works package - II for 1x125 mw lignite based thermal power plant at Giral state - II in Barmer Distt, Rajasthan
r 4 26.90
26.90
13.45
Yes Yes Yes 14.79
14.79 7.40
19
Construction of new BG line from Nandyal to Yerraguntla stations - Earth work in formation, construction
s 4 25.98
25.98
12.99
Yes Yes Yes 25.98
25.98 12.99
20
Rock quarrying and transportation for construction of breakwater and groins works
t 4 157.4
6 157.46
78.73
No Yes No 0.00
0 0.00
1. Quarrying and Transportation could not be classified as EPC Infrastructure project
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 63
21
Site Levelling & Infrastructure works package for Kudgi Super Thermal Power Project, Stage-I (3x800 MW)
u 4 63.60
63.60
31.80
No Yes No 0.00
0 0.00
1. This project only includes levelling of land, i.e. earth work and cannot be classified under Infrastructure Project
22
Earthwork excavation,Building works (RCC Frame Structures) Formation of Internal Roads,External Water supply system and External Electrification works at our Plant Anrak Aluminium Limited
v 4 86.25
86.25
43.13
Yes Yes 86.25
86.25
43.13
23
Expansion and modification of existing terminal building
w 4 58.90
58.90
29.45
Yes Yes 58.90
58.9
29.45
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is AAI, and the Project is under Airport sector
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 64
24
Balance work for Construction of New Terminal building Complex at Khajuraho Airport (Risk & Cost)
x 4 37.06
37.06
18.53
Yes Yes Yes 37.06
37.06
18.53
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is AAI, and the Project is under Airport sector
25
Construction of Admin/ Training/ Communication Block, 540 Men Barrack Go's Mess & Quarter Guard for 4th Ballalion of CISF at Sivagangai (Tamil Nadu)
y 4 26.47
26.47
13.24
No Yes No 0.00
0
0.00
1. Project Could not be considered under Infrastructure Sector
26
Construction of concrete Barrage and Earthen Bund across Kanhan River at Kochi, TA Saoner Distt.Nagpur, Maharashtra State
z 4 40.97
40.97
20.49
Yes Yes Yes 40.97
40.97
20.49
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 65
27
Construction of Mini Secretariat, Chuchandrapur, Manipur
aa 4 22.36
22.36
11.18
Yes Yes Yes 22.36
22.36
11.18
28
Construction of Civil and Structural Works for OSL Hospital at Gurgaon
ab 4 34.86
34.86
17.43
Yes Yes Yes 34.86
34.86
17.43
29
KTPS-O&M- Formation of Northern Ash Pond-II upto EI +92.00 M including well and Barrel etc, at Paloncha, Khammam Distt.
ac 4 23.80
23.80
11.90
No Yes No 0.00
0
0.00
1. Project Could not be considered under Infrastructure Sector
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 66
30
Package 5: Excavation of Main Canal, Formation of Banks including Canal Lining and Construction of CM & CD works from km 93.70 to km 111.00 of left Main Canal of Indira Sagar Project (Name of Project) for Core Sector - Irrigation Project
ad 4 60.39 60.39
30.20
Yes Yes Yes 0 0 0
1. The Statutory Auditor has certified the project company is I&CAD Department, AP. However the applicant was engaged by Sabir Dam & Waterworks Construction Company and not directly by the project company. To understand the nature iof association with the said project company document from the JV regarding nature of association of Applicant need to be reviewed. Certificate / Document regarding revenue receipt by applicant from the project company shall also need a review.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 67
Total (Rs. In crore)
1971.29
985.65
487.72 243.86
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s Sri Avantika – Sudheeksha JV and Others meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the project
location applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification:
Based on the examination of the clarification’s submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification for the below mentioned locations.
Table – 6.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Narela 92.00 902.14 yes 451.07
2 Whitefield 64.00 902.14 yes 451.07
Clarifications sought:
1. The submitted POA has not been supported by Board Resolution. 2. The declaration regarding non-performance has not been submitted. 3. Clarification is required regarding the nature of association with the employer wherein the project owner is not the employer.
Clarifications furnished:
The applicant vide letter dated has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s:
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 68
2. Submitted the Board resolution in support of PoA
3. Submitted the declaration regarding non performance
4. The explanation given by the applicant in the furnished document is not sufficient enough to address the query raised, therefore not possible to
consider the project experience for these projects. However the applicant is able to meet the technical capacity without these projects, but the total
experience score of the applicant is decreased.
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 69
(vii) ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD (LM, FM AND OMM) AND ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND US (TM)
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 7.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Narela
2 Whitefield
To qualify for applied projects locations the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs.19.50 crore and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of
Rs 92.00 Crore.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed, that the application not signed by authorized signatory and stated unknown for material non-performance or contractual
compliance in past projects.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 25)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted ADM agro (Page 5 to Page 6) and Archer Midland (Page 7 to Page 10)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted for Archer (Page 28 to Page 35) &(Page 210 to Page 235) MOA & AOA has submitted by Lead member ADM
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of NA for ADM agro. (Page 6) Declared unknown (9&10) by Archer
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 11 to Page 12)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 70
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 13 to page 14)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years audited financials (Partial) for Archer from (Page 36 to page 59) and for ADM s agro submitted audited ( Page 60 to 200)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for 31
st March 2015 (FY14-15 not
considered (Page 15 )
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted, but not signed by authorized signatory (Page 16 to Page 20)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by internal audit department (Page 21) (Not submitted by Statutory auditor/auditor
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 22 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted PoA & BR (Page 201 to page 203), Apostille certificate (Page 26 to 27
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 204 to page 209) with apostille certificate
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 236 to page 244)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 7.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 71
1 ADM Agro 170.83 For FY 14-15
The statutory auditor submitted the certificate for unaudited FY14-15 stating Rs.246.93 crore as on 31
st march 2015.
The Applicant has not provided Net Worth certificate from Statutory Auditor for the year 2013-14 and hence the Net Worth of the Applicant could not
be verified with the figures from the Financial Statements of the same year.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 7.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Cate
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score**
Check on project is eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 72
gories 3 and 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 Archer Daniels midland
a 3 138.
450 138.450 51.92
- - -
Not certified by statutory auditor/ auditor who audit the accounts, but certified by internal audit team.
Total (Rs. In crore)
138.450 51.92
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s ADM Agro do not meet the Technical Threshold Capacity due to non-compliance of certificate from
statutory auditor or auditor who audit the accounts for any of the project location applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ.
The authority may ask the clarification regarding the details of statutory auditor or auditor.
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may not be
considered for pre-qualification.
.Table – 7.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Narela 92.00 Unable to verify No N.A.
2 Whitefield 64.00 Unable to verify No N.A.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 73
Clarifications sought:
1. Project experience certificate is given by Internal Audit Department whereas the same was required from Statutory Auditor as per Appendix –I, Annex-IV. 2. The consortium member Archer Daniels Midland stated unknown against non -performance declaration. 3. Only partial audited Financial Statement have been submitted.
Clarifications furnished:
The applicant vide letter dated has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s:
1. The explanation given by the applicant not supported by statutory auditor’s certificate/ auditor’s certificate, therefore the claimed project experience shall not be considered. Hence the applicant is not meeting the threshold technical capacity.
2. The explanation given by the applicant not supported by non- performance declaration
3. The explanation given by the applicant not supported by the complete audited financial statements
FINAL STATUS: NOT ELIGIBLE (The applicant is not meeting technical capacity criteria and has not submitted the documents as per the terms of
the RFQ document).
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 74
(viii) PRISTINE LOGISTICS & INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD.
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 8.1
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
crore.
Submitted Documents Review
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 255)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 256 to Page 259)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 260 to Page 263)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 86 to Page 250)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of NA
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 264)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 265)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years from (Page 1 to page 84)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 75
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for 31 March 2014(Page 266)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 267 to Page 269)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor (Page 270 to Page 272)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Submitted by company secretary (need to be verified) (Page 278)
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 273)
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted POA and BR (Page 274 to page 277)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below:
Table 8.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 Pristine 71.20
Presented by the earlier statutory auditor i.e. Marodia Khanna & Associate
Submitted the statutory auditor’s certificate and audited financial statements. The applicant is meeting the minimum net worth criteria.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 76
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Pristine is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all of the locations applied
for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 8.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant / Member of Consortium & Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Pristine Logistics and Infrastructure Logistics Limited
A 2 0.000 35.94 53.58 89.52 89.52 Yes Yes
No, categor
y revised
to 4*
35.94
35.94 17.97
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 77
and Inland Container Depot and Private Freight Terminal at Panki, Kanpur
Inland Container Depot and Private Freight Terminal at Chawa Payal, Ludhiana, Punjab
B 2 0.000 48.41 0.00 48.41 48.41 Yes Yes
No, category revised to 4
0.00 0.0 0.00
Not considered figures after FY13-14
Inland Container Depot and Private Freight Terminal at Bihta, Bihar
C 2 0.000 13.170 0.16 13.33 13.33 Yes Yes
No, categor
y revised
to 4
0.00 0.00* 0.00
Not considered figures after FY13-14
Total (Rs. In crore)
151.260
151.260
35.94 17.97
**Experience Score has no unit
*Revenues shall not be applicable in case of projects falls in category 4 as per the provisions of the RFQ document.
Pre-qualification –
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 78
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may not be
considered for pre-qualification.
Table – 8.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 35.94 No 17.97
2 Sahnewal 90.00 35.94 No 17.97
3 Narela 92.00 35.94 No 17.97
4 Kathiar 90.00 35.94 No 17.97
5 Changsari 94.00 35.94 No 17.97
6 Whitefield 64.00 35.94 No 17.97
Clarifications sought:
1. Clarification is required regarding the tenure of the shareholding in the associates for eligible projects.
2. Company Secretary Certification needs to be verified for associate Clarifications furnished: The applicant vide letter dated has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s:
1. The applicant shared the period of the shareholding in the associate through certificate duly certified by earlier statutory auditor and the present statutory auditor of the associate firms. However the claimed projects are unable to meet the technical capacity
2. The applicant confirmed the company secretary details along with supported document from Ministry of Company Affairs.
FINAL STATUS: NOT ELIGIBLE (The applicant is not meeting minimum threshold technical capacity criteria)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 79
(ix) DINESHCHANDRA R. AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT. LTD.
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 9.1: Applied Locations
S.No. Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed that in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted documents review
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 5)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 7 to Page 10)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 12 to Page 14)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page16, 64 to Page 84)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 80
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of NIL
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 20 to Page 21)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
Submitted (Page 23 to page 27)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years from (FY13-14 partial audited ) to FY 09-10(Page 89 to page 245)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor(Page 26)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 29 to 47)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for. (Page 30 to 48)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Not applicable
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 50 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted POA and BR (Page 57 to page 61)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11 Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below:
Table 9.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 81
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March 2014
(Rs. in crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 Dineshchandra R. Agrawal
138.52 Present Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Dineshchandra R. Agrawal Infracon Private Limited is positive and is meeting the
Financial Capacity for all of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 9.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
TTC Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for develo
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects
TTC Experience Score
Remarks
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 82
pment of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
in Categories 1 and 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 83
1
Four Lanning of Km0+500 to Km 52+700 of Kolaghat-Haldia Section of NH-41 in the state of West Bengal -Balance work and Improvement of HPL Link Road at Haldia (West Bengal) from Km.0+150 to Km.6+275
a 4 349.16 349.16 174.58 Yes Yes Yes
349.16
349.16 174.58
1. The certified Estimated Project Cost is Rs 295.82 Cr. It is common in construction EPC contract that the Actual Cost is higher than Estimated cost.
2
Six Laning of DhanKuni to Kharagpur section NH-6 from Km 17.600 to Km 129.00 (Length 111.400 Km)in the State of West Bengal under NHDP Phase-V
b 4 282.69 282.69 141.35 Yes Yes Yes
282.69
282.69 141.35
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 84
3
Upgardation of Mehrauli-Gurgaon Section (Andheria More to Delhi/Haryana border) from 33.300 to 40.755 of NH-236 in the NCT of Delhi
c 4 110.23 110.23 55.12 Yes Yes Yes
110.23
110.23 55.12
1. The certified Estimated Project Cost is Rs 107.85 Cr. It is common in construction EPC contract that the Actual Cost is higher than Estimated cost.
4
Provision of Resurfacing of Runway and Air Craft areas at AF station NAL
d 4 114.68 114.68 57.34 Yes Yes Yes
114.00
114 57.00
5
Improvement and Strengthening of roads of Okhla Industrial Area Phase-I & II in Central zone
e 4 125.18 125.18 62.59 Yes Yes Yes
125.18
125.18 62.59
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 85
6
Constructions of new Bridges /Structures, repair of existing Four Lane Highway from Kharagpur to Bleshwar Section of NH-60 from Km 0.000 to Km 119.300 in the State of Orissa and West Bengal and its operation and maintained under NHDP Phase I to be executed as BOT (Toll) on DBFOT Pattern (EPC Contract)
f 4 155.85 155.85 77.93 Yes Yes Yes
155.85
155.85 77.93
7
Four Laning and Strengthening of NH-45B from Tovarankrichi Bypass End KM 60.950 (Existing Km60.00 of NH45B) to Othakkadai Bypass End Km 124.840 (Existing Sivaganga Intersection at Inner Ring road) (Contract Package-VIIB)
g 4 95.79 95.79 47.90 Yes Yes Yes
95.79 95.79 47.90
1. 50% shareholding in consortium hence 50% of revenue received considered.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 86
8
Four laning and strengthening of the Existing two lane National Highway -45B from Trichy Bypass End to Tovarankrichi (From KM 0.0 to 60.95 in Tamil Naidu (Contract Package -VIIA))
h 4 84.38 84.38 42.19 Yes Yes Yes
84.38 84.38 42.19
1. 50% shareholding in consortium hence 50% of revenue received considered.
9
Construction of Grade Separator at Dabri Intersection of Pankha road and Road leading to Dawarka near Janakpuri,Delhi
i 4 84.13 84.13 42.07 Yes Yes Yes
84.13 84.13 42.07
1. 97.50% shareholding in consortium hence 97.50% of revenue received considered.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 87
10
Widening and strengthening of existing National Highway from Km 1065.00 to Km 1040.30 of Nalbari to Bijni section of NH-31 in Assam on East West corridor under Phase - II programme of NHDP (package -AS-6)
J 4 81.04 81.04 40.52 Yes Yes Yes
81.04 81.04 40.52
1. 50% shareholding in consortium hence 50% of revenue received considered.
Total (Rs. In crore)
1483.13 741.57 1483.13 741.57
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s Dinesh Chandra R. Agrawal Private Limited meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the
project location applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant may be considered for pre-qualification any location applied for.
Table – 9.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
2 Sahnewal 90.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 88
3 Narela 92.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
4 Kathiar 90.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
5 Changsari 94.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
6 Whitefield 64.00 1483.13 yes 741.57
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 89
(x) ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 10.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs.62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed that in pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 2 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 5 to Page 6)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 57 to Page 89)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Litigation History submitted (Page 10 to Page 11)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 90
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 12)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 13)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years (Page 92 to Page 319) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net Worth Certificate Submitted (Page 13)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 19 to Page 52)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor and client (Page 20 to Page 52)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 53 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
POA submitted (Page 54 to page 55), BR submitted (Page 56)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 10.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st March 2014
(Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd
1099.06 Present Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 91
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited is positive and is meeting the Financial
Capacity for all of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 10.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 92
1
Strengthening and widening of existing 2-lane Road to 4-Lane dual carriageway from Km 18.000 - Km 63.000 of NH-11 (Agra Bharatpur section) in the states of Uttar Pradesh & Rajasthan on BOT basis
a 2 14.93 86.79 101.72
101.72
Yes Yes Yes 14.93 86.79 101.72
101.72
2
Strengthening and widening of existing 2-lane Road to 4-Lane dual carriageway from Km 12.600- Km84.700 of NH-3 (Indore khalghat section) in the state of Madhya Pradesh on BOT
b 2 81.94 387.65
469.59
469.59
Yes Yes Yes 81.94 387.64
469.58
469.58
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 93
basis
3
4-laning of madhya pradesh /Maharashtra border Nagpur section of NH-7 from Km.652.000(New Km 653.225) to Km. 729.000 including construction of Kamptee-Kanhan Bypass and Nagpur Bypass and maintance of already 4-laned section from Km14.585
c 2 1580.83
162.44
1743.27
1743.27
Yes Yes Yes 1580.83
162.45
1743.28
1743.28
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 94
to Km 36.600 of NH-7 (Nagpur-Hyderabad Section) in the state of maharashtra under NHDP Phase-II on Design,built,finance ,operate and transfer (DBFOT) basis
4
4-laning of Hungund-Hospet of NH-13 from Km202.000 to Km. 299.000 i in the state of Karnatka under NHDP Phase-III on Design,built,finance ,operate and transfer (DBFOT) basis
d 2 801.52 76.02 877.54
877.54
Yes Yes Yes 801.52
76.03 877.55
877.55
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 95
5
6-laning of Etawah-Chakeri of NH-2 from Km 323.475to Km. 483.687 i in the state of Uttar pradesh under NHDP Phase-IV on Design,built,finance ,operate and transfer (DBFOT) toll basis
e 2 835.38 177.59
1012.97
1012.97
Yes Yes Yes 835.38
177.59
1012.97
1012.97
6
Construction contract for saleem-Ulundurpet section from Km 62.250 to Km 136.70 on NH-68 in Tamil Naidu
f 4 388.21 388.21
194.11
Yes Yes Yes 382.62 382.62
191.31
Value from client certificate considered
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 96
7
Construction of Rigid pavement and Granular layers for Yamuna Expressway between 110.225 to Km. 165.537
g 4 921.92 921.92
460.96
Yes Yes Yes 921.92 921.92
460.96
8
Construction of 4-laning of pune-sholapur section of NH-9 from Km.93.700 to Km. 144.400 in the state of Maharashtra
h 4 444.64 444.64
222.32
Yes Yes Yes 444.64 444.64
222.32
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 97
9
4-laning of Nagpur-Betul of NH-69 from Km 257.00in the state of Madhya Pradesh and from Km. 59.300 to Km3.000 i in the state of Maharashtra under NHDP Phase-IV on Design,built,finance ,operate and transfer (Annuity) basis
i 4 2861.31
2861.31
1430.66
Yes Yes Yes 2861.3 2861.31
1430.66
Total (Rs. In crore)
8821.17
6513.13
8815.59
6510.35
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that M/s Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the
project location applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, The Applicant may be considered for pre-qualification
Table – 10.4: Pre-qualification Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 98
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
2 Sahnewal 90.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
3 Narela 92.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
4 Kathiar 90.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
5 Changsari 94.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
6 Whitefield 64.00 8815.59 yes 6510.35
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 99
(xi) OSR INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS
Name of the Applicant/ Consortium Members Shareholding Pattern of Consortium Members
1. OSR Infra Pvt Limited
74%
2. ADSTEEL l Limited
26%
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 11.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and it is
observed that the Appendix – II (PoA for signing Application and Bid) is not supported by proper charter document. Clarification in this
regard need to be sought from the applicant. Further, The LM representative have not signed and sealed all the pages of the document
submitted. In pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, to the best of our knowledge so far, the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 100
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 415)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 5 to Page 7)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 370 to Page 412)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Not submitted ( Page 7)
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 8 to Page 9)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
FC submitted (Page 10 to Page 11)
5a Audited five years annual reports
OSR INFRA PVT LTD Submitted for four years (Page 17 to Page 70) for FY 2010-11 to FY 2013-14 ADC ENERGY SYSTEM Submitted for six years (Page 71 to Page 165) for FY 2007-08 to FY 2012-13, for FY 2013-14 the audit is in process
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net Worth Certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for OSR Infra (Page 12 to Page 16). Not submitted by statutory auditor for ADC energy
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 166 to Page 181)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by auditor, not by statutory auditor(Page 182 to Page 183)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Submitted by auditor, not by statutory auditor (Page 184 to Page 189)
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 190 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
POA submitted (Page 191 to page 193). BR not submitted
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 194 to Page 196 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 197 to Page 201)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 101
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 11.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31
st
March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 OSR Infra 16.93 Provided 1. Audited Annual Financial Report of FY 13-14 submitted
2 Adsteel Limited 92.99 Provided
1. Audited Balance sheet of Year ending December 2014 not provided. 2. The Balance Sheet provided is of ADC Energy Systems LCC who is an associate.
However document provided to establish more than 50% voting shareholding, in pursuance of 2.2.9 is not wholly translated by translator and further it is attested by Govt. of U.A.E. or embassy of India.
3 Total 109.92
It is observed from the above table that the clarification need to be sought from the applicant regarding the net worth of M/s ADSTEEL Limited to
ascertain the Financial Capacity for all of the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the
RFQ. **
**Subject to clarification on Financial Statements of Adsteel Limited and its Associate
Threshold Technical Capacity –
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 102
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 11.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs
in crore) Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments
made/ receive
d for construction of Eligible Projects
in Categor
ies 3 and 4
Payments made
for development of Eligible Projects
in Categori
es 1 and 2
Revenues
appropriated from
Eligible Project
s in Categor
ies 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Adsteel Limited and West Bay (District Cooling Plant #3@ 37,500 TR Capacity)
2a 4 150.00 150.00 75.0
0 Yes Yes
Do n
ot m
ee
t C
-4
cri
teria
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 103
2
Saraya Corniche Development (EPC-District Cooling Plant of 52,000 TR)
2b 4 60.00 60.00 30.0
0 Yes Yes
3
Marina Phase 1 (EPC-District Cooling Plant @ 90,000 TR Capacity)
2c 4 165.00 165.00 82.5
0 Yes Yes
4
Saadiyat Island (District Cooling Plant #3@ 35,000 TR Capacity)
2d 4 130.00 130.00 65.0
0 Yes Yes
5
New York University (EPC-District Cooling Plant @ 16,000 TR Capacity)
2e 4 144.00 144.00 72.0
0 Yes Yes
6
Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Co (EPC-District Cooling Plant @ 25,000 TR Capacity)
2f 4 138.00 138.00 69.0
0 Yes Yes
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 104
7
Dragon Mart Expansion (EPC-Modular District Cooling Plant @ 10,000 TR Capacity)
2g 4 160.00 160.00 80.0
0 Yes Yes
8
Shams (Modular District Cooling Plant @ 10,000 TR Capacity)
2h 4 24.00 24.00 12.0
0 Yes Yes
9
King Saud University Endowment (EPC-District Cooling Plant @ 15,000 TR Capacity)
2i 4 66.00 66.00 33.0
0 Yes Yes
10
Saadiyat Island (EPC - District Cooling Plant # 2 @ 12,500 TR Capacity)
2j 4 126.00 126.00 63.0
0 Yes Yes
11
Dubai Investment Park (EPC-District Cooling Plant # 3 @ 37,500 TR Capacity)
2k 4 65.00 65.00 32.5
0 Yes Yes
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 105
12
Rheem Island (EPC-District Cooling Plant @ 90,000 TR Capacity)
2l 4 68.00 68.00 34.0
0 Yes Yes
Total (Rs. In crore)
1296 648.00
0.00 0.00
**Experience Score has no unit
The applicant has submitted the consolidated auditor’s certificate for all projects in the annexure.
It is observed from the above table that the applicant is not meeting the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the project location applied for, as
per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ.
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may not be
considered for pre-qualification.
.
Table – 11.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 No
2 Sahnewal 90.00 No
3 Narela 92.00 No
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 106
4 Kathiar 90.00 No
5 Changsari 94.00 No
6 Whitefield 64.00 No
Clarifications sought:
1. The submitted POA is not supported by Board Resolution/ Proper Charter Document. 2. The declaration regarding non-performance is not submitted. As per point 7 of Annex– I of the Appendix I of the RFQ document, the same needs to be supported by declaration from the applicant. 3. The project experience certificate is submitted by Audited only whereas the same was required to be submitted duly certified by Statutory Auditor
Clarifications furnished: The applicant vide letter dated has submitted the following in support of above mentioned Clarification’s:
2. Provided the copy of the Board Resolution in support of POA
3. The applicant has not furnished the non- performance declaration
4. The explanation given by the applicant has not been supported by document, therefore the claimed experience cannot be considered. FINAL STATUS: NOT ELIGIBLE (The applicant is not meeting the technical capacity criteria and has not submitted the documents as per the RFQ document)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 107
(xii) M/S GARWAR – ELL ESS JV
Name of the Applicant/ Consortium Members Shareholding Pattern of Consortium Members
1. ELL ESS
60%
2. Garwar Construction Limited
40%
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 12.1: Applied Locations
S.No Locations
1 Sahnewal
2 Narela
3 Changsari
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 34.50 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
Crores.
However before evaluating the Financial Capacity & Technical Capacity of the Applicant the eligibility of the applicant has been evaluated and in
pursuance of various relevant clause of the RFQ, to the best of our knowledge so far, the Application is eligible for evaluation.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (page 294)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 3)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 4 to Page 5 for ELL and page 14 to 15 for Gawar)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 108
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Incorporation Certificate Submitted (Page 6 to Page 25) MOA & AOA Submitted (Page 26 to Page 82) only for GAWAR. Not submitted for ELSS
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration given by both the members ( Page 5 and Page 15)
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 83)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
submitted (Page 243)
5a Audited five years annual reports GAWAR CONST LTD Submitted for five years (Page 91 to Page 242) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net Worth Certificate Submitted by auditor ( Not by statutory auditor) (Page 84 to Page 90)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 244 to Page 291)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted (Page 244 to Page 291)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 292 to Page 293 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
POA submitted (Page 296 to page 301), BR submitted (Page 302)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 303 to Page 304 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 305 to Page 308)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 12.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 109
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs.
In crore) Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 Elss 0 Yes Net worth certificate provided based on 31st march 2015 which cannot be considered
2 Garwar 199.39 Yes as on 31
st
March 2014
Provided statutory auditor and audited financial statements
3 Total 199.39
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Garwar – Ess JV is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all of the locations
applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below:
Table 12.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 110
S.No.
Applicant/Member of Consortium& Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Gawar Construction Limited and Construction of Master Roads Sector-75 to 89, Faridabad. "Supply & Laying of Earth Work in embankment, Granular Sub Base, Wet Mix Macadam, Dense Bituminous Macadam, Bituminous Concrete
A 4 173.36 0.000 0.000 173.36
86.68 Yes Yes Yes 173.36 173 86.68
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 111
M-20 Cast in Situ Kerb & Channel,Reinforced Cement Concrete drain, Culverts & all other work contingent (Including one year free defect liability period & further 4 year paid maintainance after successful completion of work & free maintainance period.
2
Improvement by raising, widening strengthening and providing side drains,CC Pavement on various roads in Jhajjhar Distt. (Package
B 4 151.85 0.00 0.00 151.85
75.93 Yes Yes Yes 151.85 152 75.93
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 112
No HSRDC/NCR/C-22 of 2010)
3
Four Laning Rohtak Bhiwani Road (Km 91.6 to 113.91) & four lanning of Rohtak Hisar road from drain No. 8 to Bahujamalpur (Km 79.2 to 86.80) in Rohtak Distt. (Package No. HSRDC/NCR/C-23/2009)
C 4 126.28 0.00 0.00 126.28
63.14 Yes Yes Yes 126.28 126 63.14
4
Improvement of Bahadurgarh-Jhajjar road Km 0.00 to Km. 28.300
D 4 79.78 0.00 0.00 79.78
39.890 Yes Yes Yes 79.78 80 39.89
5
Widening with raising and Strengthening to two lane with geometric improvement and
E 4 68.08 0.00 0.00 68.08
34.04 Yes Yes Yes 68.08 68 34.04
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 113
construction/ reconstruction of C.D. work from Km. 0/0 to Km. 5/0, Km 11/0 to Km. 31/0, Km 50/0 to 51/0, Km 57/0 to Km 59/100 and Km 64/250 to Km 88/500 on NH-90 (Baran-Atru-Chhipabarod-Aklera Road) in Rajasthan State under special project scheme (Job nk 90/RJ/2009-10/06)
6
Construction of 75 mtr. (2x14) and 60 mtr (2x12.5) wide sectors roads sector between sector-99 to 115
F 4 63.99 0.00 0.00 63.99
32.00 Yes Yes Yes 63.99 64 32.00
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 114
gurgaon manesar urban complex 2025 AD
7
Widening and Strengthening of road from Bahalgarh Chowk (NH-1) to Sonepat to Gohana to Sonepat District Boundary on Jind road from Km 11.600 to 74.000
G 4 46.23 0.00 0.00 46.23
23.12 Yes Yes Yes 46.23 46 23.12
8
Construction of 60 mtr wide master roads between sec 66/67, 65/54, 65/66, 64/67, 62/65, 63/64, 62/63, 61/60, 58/61,
H 4 44.52 0.00 0.00 44.52
22.26 Yes Yes Yes 44.52 45 22.26
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 115
59/61, 59/60, 58/59 and outer of Sector-58 Gurgaon
9
Improvement of Punhana Jurhera road and providing service lane & Drains on Gurgaon Nuh Alwar Road in Gurgaon & Mewat Distt. (Package No HSRDC/NCR/C-26/2009)
I 4 43.95 0.00 26.95 70.90
35.45 Yes Yes Yes 43.95 44 21.98
10
Improvement & Strengthening of Dhansa Road from Najafgarh Town to Dhansa Border, NGZ
J 4 42.48 0.00 0.00 42.48
21.24 Yes Yes Yes 42.48 42 21.24
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 116
11
Widening of NH-10 (Delhi Rohtak Road) from 6/7 lanes to 8 lanes from RD 12.300 km (Punjabi Bagh) to RD 24.00 km (Mundaka) in Delhi
K 4 38.32 0.00 0.00 38.32
19.16 Yes Yes Yes 38.32 38 19.16
12
Improvement of 4 nos road in Kaithal Distt. (i) 4 Lane on old bye pass connecgting Kaithal Ambala Patiala road (City Portion) (ii) 6 lane on Kaithal Ambala road from Pehowa Chowk to New bye pass in city portion km 123.18 to 125.28 (iii) 6 lane on Karnal Kaithal road
L 4 34.43 0.00 0.00 34.43
17.22 34.43 34 17.22
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 117
upto Pehowa Chowk (Km 69.40 to 72.00) (iv) 6 lane on Kaithal Kurukshetra road (Km 41.50 to 44.00)
13
Upgradation of Saharanpur Kurukshetra road Km 55.00 to 76.150
M 4 32.60 0.00 0.00 32.60
16.30 32.60 33 16.30
14
Up-gradation of Master Road from HUDA City centre to Subhash Chowk Gurgaon
N 4 32.31 0.00 0.00 32.31
16.16 32.31 32 16.16
5
Improvement of road by way of Widening / Strengthening on Kalunaur Basana Meham road from Km 0.00 to Km 18.184 in Rohtak Distt. (Road ID no.
O 4 31.87 0.00 0.00 31.87
15.94 31.87 32 15.94
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 118
1764, 1758 & 1759)
Total (Rs. In crore)
1037.00
518.50 1010.05 505.03
**Experience Score has no unit
It is observed from the above table that Garwar – ELL ESS Construction JV meets the Technical Threshold Capacity for any of the project location
applied for, as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ
Pre-qualification –
In pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant may be considered for pre-qualification.
Table – 12.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Sahnewal 90.00 1010.05 Yes 505.03
3 Narela 92.00 1010.05 Yes 505.03
5 Changsari 94.00 1010.05 Yes 505.03
FINAL STATUS: PRE-QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 119
(xiii) JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS
Name of the Applicant/ Consortium Members
Shareholding Pattern of Consortium Members
1. JKG Infratech Private Ltd
26%
2. Ahuja and Anand Buildwell Pvt Ltd
26%
3. SSR Buildcon Pvt Ltd 26%
4. Mr. Sanjeev Gupta 11%
5. Mr. Vipul Mittal 11%
The applicant has applied for the following location –
Table 13.1
S.No Locations
1 Narela
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs.11.50 crore and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 92.00
crore.
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 5)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 2 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 6 to Page 14)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 120
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
JKG INFRATECH PVT LTD Submitted MOA & AOA (Page 206 to Page 247) and BR (Page 248) AHUJA & ANAND BUIDWELL PVT LTD Submitted MOA & AOA (Page 249 to Page 288) and BR (Page 289) SSR INFRABUIDCON PVT LTD Submitted MOA & AOA (Page 290 to Page 314) and BR (Page 315)
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form “Not applicable” for all three members
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 15 to Page 16)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Worth)
FC submitted (Page 17)
5a Audited five years annual reports
JKG INFRATECH PVT LTD Submitted for five years (Page 52 to Page 113) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14 AHUJA & ANAND BUIDWELL PVT LTD Submitted for five years (Page 114 to Page 174) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14 SSR INFRABUIDCON PVT LTD Submitted for five years (Page 175 to Page 205) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14 (Partial audited documents without notes to financial statements)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net Worth Certificate Submitted (Page 18 to Page 22)
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 23 to Page 27)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor (Page 28 to Page 31)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
NA
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 32 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
POA submitted (Page 33 to page 36). BR 248. 289 and 315 for all members
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Submitted (Page 37 to Page 43 )
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Submitted (Page 44 to Page 51)
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 121
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 13.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. in crore)
Statutory Certification Remarks
1 JKG Infratech Private Limited 4.517 Submitted Submitted the statutory auditors certificate and audited financial statements
2. Ahuja and Anand Buildwell Pvt. Ltd 4.827 Submitted Submitted the statutory auditors certificate and audited financial statements
3. SSR Infra Buildcon Pvt Ltd 2.387 Submitted Submitted the statutory auditors certificate and audited financial statements
Total 11.73
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of the applicant is meeting the Financial Capacity for applied location (Narela) as per
provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 13.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 122
S.No.
Applicant / Member of Consortium & Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible & Comments on Appendix - I submitted by Applicant
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total
Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
JKG Infratech Pvt Ltd and Six Laning of Gurgaon-Kotputli-Jaipur Section of NH-8 (DBFOT-Design Build Finance Operate Transfer)
1a 2 0.000 0.000 26.950 26.950
26.950 Yes Yes 4 26.950 26.950
13.48
2
Development of Land (For Real State)
1b 4 14.980 0.000 0.000 14.980
7.490
No Yes
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 123
3
Work of Regional water supply scheme of 199 villages and their habitations. Sub Head:- Restoration of Road
1c 4 11.180 0.000 0.000 11.180
5.590 Yes
4 11.180
11.18
5.59
4
Ahuja and Anand Buidwell Pvt Ltd and World Square Mall Construction (Real State Project)
2a 4 153.460
0.000 0.000 153.460
76.730 Yes
Yes 4
153.460
153.46
76.73
Total (Rs. In crore)
206.570
116.760
191.59
95.80
**Experience Score has no unit
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 124
Table – 13.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Narela 92.00 191.59 Yes 95.80
Clarifications Sought:
1. Kindly clarify the Net Worth claimed in the Statutory Auditors certificate vis a vis the Financial Statements for M/s SSR Buildcon. Clarifications furnished:
1. The applicant has furnished the statutory auditor certificate with net worth calculation details.
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 125
(xiv) SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LTD
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 14.1
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs.62.25 crore and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs. 94.00
Crore
Submitted Documents Review:
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (page 344)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 1 to Page 4)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 5 to Page 8)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted MOA & AOA (Page 110 to Page 205) for Sree Shubham Not submitted for Kalpataru Transmission
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Submitted (Page 8)
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 9)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant FC submitted (Page 10 to Page 12)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted for five years (Page 209 to Page 338) for FY 2009-10 to FY 2013-14
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Net Worth Certificate submitted (Page 12 to 13)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 126
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 14 to Page 105)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted (Page 14 to Page 105)
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
submitted by company secretary ( but not from company) (Page 106)
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 107 )
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
POA submitted (Page 206 to page 208), BR submitted (Page 343 to Page 345)
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
NA
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement NA
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
Table 14.2: Financial Capacity Status
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1 Shree Shubham Logistics Ltd
82.08 Present Submitted the statutory auditor’s certificate and audited financial statements. The applicant is meeting the minimum net worth criteria.
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Shree Shubham Logistics Ltd is positive and is meeting the Financial Capacity for all of
the locations applied for either individually or in any combination as per provisions of clause 2.2.2 (B) of the RFQ.
Threshold Technical Capacity –
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 127
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 14.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant (Rs in crore)
Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant / Member of Consortium & Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible & Comments on Appendix - I submitted by Applicant
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
Shree Shubham Logistics and Construction of Warehouse at Devas, Madhya Pradesh
a 1 0.000 20.56 1.44 22.00 27.50 Yes Yes Yes 0.00 20.56 1.44 22.00 27.50
Construction of Warehou
b 1 0.000 12.990 0.870 13.86 17.325 Yes Yes Yes 0.000 12.990 0.870 13.86 17.32
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 128
se at Harda, Madhya Pradesh
Construction of Warehouse at Itarsi, Madhya Pradesh
c 1 0.000 11.15 1.06 12.21 15.263 Yes Yes Yes 0.000 11.150 1.060 12.21 15.263
Construction of Warehouse at Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh
d 1 0.000 14.880 0.470 15.35
0 19.188 Yes Yes Yes 0.000 14.880 0.470 15.35 19.188
Construction of Warehouse at Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh
e 1 0.000 12.220 0.370 12.59
0 15.738 Yes Yes Yes 0.000 12.220 0.370
12.590
15.738
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Bina-Pichore Transmission Line.
f 4 85.740 0.000 0.000 85.74
0 42.870 Yes Yes Yes 85.740 0.000 0.000
85.740
42.870
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 129
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Krishnapatnam-Gooty Transmission Line.
g 4 195.88
0 0.000 0.000
195.880
97.940 Yes Yes Yes 195.88
0 0.000 0.000
195.880
97.940
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Silwar-Satna Transmission Line.
h 4 159.63
0 0.000 0.000
159.63
79.815 Yes Yes Yes 159.63
0 0.000 0.000
159.630
79.815
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Satna-Bina
i 4 183.98
0 0.000 0.000
183.980
91.990 Yes Yes Yes 183.98
0 0.000 0.000
183.980
91.990
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 130
Transmission Line.
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Gaya-Sasaram Transmission Line.
j 4 94.860 0.000 0.000 94.86
0 47.430 Yes Yes Yes 94.860 0.000 0.000
94.860
47.430
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Kaithal-Meerut Transmission Line.
k 4 66.220 0.000 0.000 66.22
0 33.110 Yes Yes Yes 66.220 0.000 0.000
66.220
33.110
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection
l 4 93.160 0.000 0.000 93.16
0 46.580 Yes Yes Yes 93.160 0.000 0.000
93.160
46.580
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 131
of Champa Pooling Station (PS)-Kurukshetra Transmission Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Subhansiri-Biswanath Chariyali Transmission Line
m 4 146.06
0 0.000 0.000
146.060
73.030 Yes Yes Yes 146.06
0 0.000 0.000
146.060
73.030
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Gopalganj-Gorakhur Transmis
n 4 156.89
0 0.000 0.000
156.890
78.445 Yes Yes Yes 156.89
0 0.000 0.000
156.890
78.445
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 132
sion Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line to wer supply, installation and erection ofVidhyacal-Korba for 400KV D/C Transmission Line from 2*600 MW Mahan TTP (Madhya Pradesh) to Sipat (Chattisgarh) Transmission Line.
o 4 335.25
0 0.000 0.000
335.250
167.625
Yes Yes Yes 335.25
0 0.000 0.000
335.250
167.625
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and
p 4 298.71
0 0.000 0.000
298.710
149.355
Yes Yes Yes 298.71
0 0.000 0.000
298.710
149.355
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 133
erection of Akola-Aurangabad Transmission Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Koldam-Ludhiana Transmission Line
q 4 96.350 0.000 0.000 96.35
0 48.175 Yes Yes Yes 96.350 0.000 0.000
96.350
48.175
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Chamradol-Satna Transmission Line
r 4 73.540 0.000 0.000 73.54
0 36.770 Yes Yes Yes 73.540 0.000 0.000
73.540
36.770
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower
s 4 140.19
0 0.000 0.000
140.190
70.095 Yes Yes Yes 140.19
0 0.000 0.000
140.190
70.095
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 134
supply, installation and erection of Angul Pooling Station-Jharsuguda Pooling Station Transmission Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Gwalior-Jaipur Transmission Line
t 4 75.720 0.000 0.000 75.72
0 37.860 Yes Yes Yes 75.720 0.000 0.000
75.720
37.860
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Babhaleshwar-Kudus
u 4 347.97
0 0.000 0.000
347.970
173.985
Yes Yes Yes 347.97
0 0.000 0.000
347.970
173.985
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 135
and Padhghe-Tarapur Transmission Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Raipur-Wardha Transmission Line
v 4 235.22
0 0.000 0.000
235.220
117.610
Yes Yes Yes 235.22
0 0.000 0.000
235.220
117.610
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Kanpur-Jhatikara (Part-1) Transmission Line
w 4 164.50
0 0.000 0.000
164.500
82.250 Yes Yes Yes 164.50
0 0.000 0.000
164.500
82.250
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply,
x 4 171.06
0 0.000 0.000
171.060
85.530 Yes Yes Yes 171.06
0 0.000 0.000
171.060
85.530
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 136
installation and erection of Kanpur-Jhatikara (Part-11) Transmission Line
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Vapi-Navi Mumbai and Navsari-Boisar Transmission Line
y 4 121.57
0 0.000 0.000
121.570
60.785 Yes Yes Yes 121.57
0 0.000 0.000
121.570
60.785
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Gwalior-Jaipur Transmission Line
z 4 249.83
0 0.000 0.000
249.830
124.915
Yes Yes Yes 249.83
0 0.000 0.000
249.830
124.915
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 137
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Kurnool-Thiruvalam (Part-11) Transmission Line
aa 4 165.16
0 0.000 0.000
165.160
82.580 Yes Yes Yes 165.16
0 0.000 0.000
165.160
82.580
EPC Project for Transmission Line tower supply, installation and erection of Kurnool-Thiruvalam (Part-111) Transmission Line
ab 4 200.29
0 0.000 0.000
200.290
100.145
Yes Yes Yes 200.29
0 0.000 0.000
200.290
100.145
EPC Project "Supply and Installation of extra high voltage
ac 4 1089.2
30 0.000 0.000
1089.230
544.615
Yes Yes Yes 1089.2
30 0.000 0.000
1089.230
544.615
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 138
transmission overhead lines"
Total (Rs. In crore)
5023.020
2568.518
5023.02
2568.518
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarification submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification.
Table – 14.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
2 Sahnewal 90.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
3 Narela 92.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
4 Kathiar 90.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
5 Changsari 94.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
6 Whitefield 64.00 5023.02 Yes 2568.51
Clarifications sought:
1. Please clarify the shareholding of the associate M/s Kalaptaru Power transmission in the claimed EPC Project.
Clarifications furnished:
1. The applicant vide letter dated 27th July 2015 has clarified the same that shareholding is not required in case of category 4 projects.
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 139
(xv) SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT. LTD
The applicant has applied for the following locations –
Table 15.1
S.No Locations
1 Kotakapura
2 Sahnewal
3 Narela
4 Kathiar
5 Changsari
6 Whitefield
To qualify for all the projects the Applicant should have a Financial Capacity of Rs 62.25 Crores and a Thresh Hold Technical Capacity of Rs 94.00
crore.
Review of Submitted Documents
S. No. Particulars Type of Document Comments
1 Proof of Purchasing RFQ Documents
Submitted (Page 1)
2 Appendix I Application for Pre-Qualification Submitted (Page 2 to Page 5)
3 Appendix I - Annexure I Details of the Applicant Submitted (Page 6 to Page 7)
3a Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted (Page 289 to Page 308) Not submitted for Leap energy
3b No material non-performance and contractual non-compliance
Declaration in form of Not Applicable
4 Appendix I - Annexure II Technical Capacity of the Applicant Submitted (Page 8)
5 Appendix I - Annexure III Financial Capacity of the Applicant (Net Submitted (Page 9 to page 11)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 140
Worth)
5a Audited five years annual reports Submitted five years audited financial statements for Si Karthikeay and associate Leap Energy for FY 09-14) (Page 40 to page 288)
5b Statutory Auditor/Auditor certificate Submitted by statutory auditor for M/s Karthikeya 31
st March 2014(Page
10) and Auditor certificate for associate
6 Appendix I - Annexure IV Details of Eligible Projects Submitted (Page 12 to Page 19)
6a Statutory Auditors/ Clients Certificate
Project Experience certification Submitted by statutory auditor for (Page 20) Self-attested by parent company (Page 21 to Page 27). Need to be certified by statutory auditor
6b Statutory auditor/company secretary certificate for Associate
Submitted (Page 31 to 35)
7 Appendix I - Annexure V Statement of Legal Capacity Submitted (Page 28)
8 Appendix II Power of Attorney for signing of Application (Board Resolution)
Submitted (Page 36 to page 37) Board Resolution not submitted
9 Appendix III Power of Attorney for Lead Member of Consortium
Not applicable
10 Appendix IV Joint Bidding Agreement Not applicable
11. Application signed by authorized signatory
Yes
12 Discrepancy in Uploaded and submitted hard copies
Evaluation of Financial Capacity & Threshold Technical Capacity –
Financial Capacity –
The evaluation of Financial Capacity based on the Audited Financial Reports of FY 2013-14 is as presented below –
The applicant (Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited) using the net worth credentials of an associate M/s Leap Green Energy Private
Limited along.
Table 15.2: Financial Capacity Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 141
S.No. Applicant / Member of Consortium
Net worth as on 31st March 2014 (Rs. In crore)
Statutory Certification
Remarks
1
Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited
13. 85 Statutory Auditors certificate
Submitted the statutory auditor’s certificate and last five years audited financial statement for Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited
3.
Associate: M/s
Leap Green Energy Private Limited.
684.22 Submitted
The applicant has submitted the auditors certificate of an associate i.e. Leap Green Energy Private Limited and also submitted last five years audited financial statements
It is observed from the above table that the Net Worth of M/s Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited is Rs.13.85 crore as on 31st
march 2014 based on the statutory auditor certificate and audited financial statements. The associate i.e Leap Energy’s net worth of Rs.684.22 crore
as on 31st march 2014 as per the auditor’s certificate,
Based on the verified net worth of Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited and associate i.e M/s Leap Energy, the applicant
fulfilling the financial capacity for all the applied locations
Threshold Technical Capacity –
The evaluation of Threshold Technical Capacity based on the performances of the Applicant in the last five financial years (FY 2009-10 to 2013-14) is
as presented below –
Table 15.3: Threshold Technical Capacity (TTC) Status
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 142
Technical capacity shown by the Applicant
(Rs in crore) Technical capacity corrected (Rs. in crore)
S.No.
Applicant / Member of Consortium & Name of Project
Project Code
Category as defined by Applicant
Payments
made/ receive
d for construction of Eligible Project
s in Categor
ies 3 and 4
Payments made
for development of Eligible Projects
in Categori
es 1 and 2
Revenues
appropriated from
Eligible
Projects in
Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Check if the project is Eligible & Comments on Appendix - I submitted by Applicant
Check on ownership
Check on categorization
Payments made/ received for construction of Eligible Projects in Categories 3 and 4
Payments made for development of Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Revenues appropriated from Eligible Projects in Categories 1 and 2
Total Experience Score
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 Wind Mill
a 2 0.000 54.690 0.000 54.69 54.69
No
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0
FY14-15 not considered
2 Wind Mill
b 4 25.480 0.000 0.000 25.48
0 12.74 Yes Yes 4 25.480 0.000 0.000 25.48 12.74
3 Wind Mill
c 4 18.720 0.000 0.000 18.72
0 9.36 Yes Yes 4 18.72 0.000 0.000 18.72 9.36
.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 143
4 Wind Mill
d 4 27.720 0.000 0.000 27.72
0 13.86
0 Yes Yes 4 27.720 0.000 0.000 27.72 13.86
5 Wind Mill
e 4 56.090 0.000 0.000 56.09 28.04
5 Yes Yes 4 56.090 0.000 0.000 56.09
28.045
6 Wind Mill
f 4 50.590 0.000 0.000 50.59 25.29
5 Yes Yes 4 50.590 0.000 0.000 50.59
25.295
7 Wind Mill
g 4 64.640 0.000 0.000 64.64
0 32.32
0 Yes Yes 4 64.640 0.000 0.000 64.64
32.320
8 Wind Mill
h 4 58.020 0.000 0.000 58.02
0 29.01
0 Yes Yes 4 58.020 0.000 0.000 58.02
29.010
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 144
Total
(Rs. In crore)
355.9
5 205.3
2
301.26
150.63
It is observed from the above table that from M/s Sri Karthikeya Spinning and Weaving Mills Private as an applicant is meeting the Technical
Threshold Capacity criteria
Pre-qualification –
Based on the examination of the clarifications submitted by the applicant and in pursuance of clause 2.2.2 (A) of the RFQ, the Applicant, may be
considered for pre-qualification.
.Table – 15.4: Pre-qualification Status
S.No Locations TTC Required Corrected TTC
Pre-qualified (yes/no)
Aggregate Experience Score
1 Kotakapura 68.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
2 Sahnewal 90.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
3 Narela 92.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
4 Kathiar 90.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
5 Changsari 94.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
6 Whitefield 64.00 310.26 Yes 150.63
Clarifications sought:
1. The submitted POA is not supported by Board Resolution. 2. As per the provisions of the RFQ document, if the Applicant owns the project the Statutory Auditor should certify as per the provisions of Instruction no. 14 (special notes to the instruction mentioned) of Annex-IV of Appendix – I whereas the experience certificate submitted by the parent company is self-attested
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 145
Clarifications furnished:
The applicant vide letter dated 30th July 201 has furnished the documents against the mentioned Clarification’s;
1. Furnished the copy of the board resolution in support of PoA.
2. The applicant has provided the statutory certification for the claimed projects.
FINAL STATUS: PRE QUALIFIED (The applicant is meeting the financial capacity and technical capacity in pursuance of the clauses of the RFQ
document.
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 146
4. CONCLUSION:
The RFQ application submitted by the 21 applicants against the RFQ floated for the project “Development of Silos at 6 locations in 5 states of India
on DBFOT basis under PPP mode” and subsequently clarifications were sought from the applicant for finalization of the RFQ evaluation process.
Based on the evaluation of the clarifications submitted by the applicant, the final status of 21 applicants are presented in the table given below:
Table A
S.No. APPLICANT Number of Locations applied for Result
1. ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD (5)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR and WHITEFIELD (5)
2. ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD
NARELA AND WHITEFIELD (2) Not qualified
3. CHICAGO CONSTRUCTION CO INFORMATION NOT FURNISHED Not qualified
4. DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
5. GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE NARELA, SAHNEWAL AND CHANGSARI (3) Prequalified NARELA, SAHNEWAL AND CHANGSARI (3)
6. JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED NARELA (1) Pre-qualified for NARELA
7. LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
8. LT FOODS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
9. NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
10. OM METALS INFRAPROJECTS LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
11. ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
12. OSR INFRA PVT. LTD KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
13. PRISTINE LOGISTICS & INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
14. SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
15. SOMA PUNJAB WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Not qualified
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 147
L
Location Wise Prequalification Details
S.NO. APPLICANT KOTAKAPURA NARELA SAHNEWAL KATHIAR CHANGSARI WHITEFIELD
1. ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
2. DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
3. GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE
Yes Yes
Yes
4. JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Yes
5. ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
6. SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
7. SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
8. STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Yes
9. SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Yes
Yes
10. TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
FINAL LIST OF PREQUAIFIED APPLICANTS FOR EACH LOCATION 6 9 7 6 6 8
16. SPECTOMS ENGINEERING PVT LTD INFORMATION NOT FURNISHED Not qualified
17. SRC COMPANY INFRA PVT LTD WHITEFIELD (1) Not qualified
18. SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
19. STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for WHITEFIELD only
20. SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
NARELA AND WHITEFIELD (2) Prequalified for NARELA AND WHITEFIELD (2)
21. TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD
KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Prequalified for KOTAKAPURA, NARELA, SAHNEWAL, KATIHAR, WHITEFIELD AND CHANGSARI (6)
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 148
Location wise ranking details of the pre-qualified applicants are given below:
1. Kotakapura
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 4
5 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD 150.63 5
6 ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED 92.06 6
2. Narela
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE 505.03 4
5 SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 451.07 5
6 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 6
7 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD 150.63 7
8 JKG INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED 95.8 8
9 ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED 92.06 9
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 149
3. Sahnewal
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE 505.03 4
5 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 5
6 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD 150.63 6
7 ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED 92.06 7
4. Katihar
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 4
5 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD
150.63 5
6 ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED 92.06 6
Development of Modern Silos at 6 Locations in 5 states of India on DBFOT basis under PPP mode
Request for Qualification (RFQ) – Final Evaluation Report 150
5. Changsari
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 GAWAR - ELL ESS JOINT VENTURE 505.03 4
5 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 5
6 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD
150.63 6
6. Whitefield
S.NO. APPLICANT Score Ranking
1 ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD 6510.35 1
2 SHREE SHUBHAM LOGISTICS LIMITED 2568.51 2
3 DINESHCHANDRA R.AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT.LTD 741.57 3
4 SUDHEEKSHA WAREHOUSE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 451.07 4
5 TOTAL SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS PVT LTD 311.45 5
6 SRI KARTHIKEYA SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS PVT LTD 150.63 6
7 ADANI AGRI LOGITICS LIMITED 92.06 7
8 STAR AGRIWAREHOUSING AND COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
53.61 8