Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Food security and Agriculture Cluster – Afghanistan
Flood Preparedness Workshop Summary Report – 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
SUMMARY REPORT ON REGIONAL FSAC ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
FLOOD PREPAREDNESS AND LIVELIHOODS WORKSHOPS ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
A: OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
B: WORKSHOPS PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
C: FSAC RESPONSE CAPACITY (SUMMARY OF 3 WS, NARRATIVE OF MAIN PLAYERS AND CAPACITIES, SUMMARY OF GAPS….) ...................................................................................... 8
WHO WORKS WHERE? ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
WHO DOES WHAT IN TERMS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS? ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12
WHO DOES WHAT IN TERMS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE? .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13
D: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN OUTLINE ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
APPENDIX I: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16
1.1. Western Region List of Participants ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16
1.2. Northern Region List of Participants ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18
1.3. Eastern Region List of Participants ............................................................................................................................................................................... 20
APENDIXE II AND III: MAPS OF 3WS .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
2.1 Western Region Maps of 3Ws ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
2.2 Northern Region Maps of 3Ws .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
2.2 Eastern Region Maps of 3Ws ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
APENDIXEIII: FLOOD RISK MAPS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
3.1. Western Region Map of Flood Risk Zones .................................................................................................................................................................... 21
3.2. Northern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones ................................................................................................................................................................... 21
3.3. Eastern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21
4.1. Western Region ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
APPENDIX VI: IMPACT ON LIVELIHOOD AND FLOOD CONTINGENCY PLANNING: RESPONSE OPTIONS ANALYSIS MATRIX ......................................................................................... 21
4.1. Northern Region ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
4.2. Eastern Region .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
5.1. Western Region ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
APPENDIX V: OPTION FOR MITIGATION AND PRIORITIES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 21
5.2. Northern Region ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
5.2. Easter Region ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
6.1. Western Region ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
APENDIXE VI: TABLES OF RESPONSE PLANNING ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
6.1. Northern Region ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
6.1. Eastern Region .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
LIST OF ACRONYMS:
3Ws Who is doing What and Where
ACTED Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development
ADEO Afghanistan Development and Education Organization
AHDAA Agency for Humanitarian and Development Assistance for Afghanistan
ANDMA Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority
AREA Agency for Rehabilitation and Energy Conservation in Afghanistan
CoAR Coordination of Afghan Relief
DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees
DAIL Directorate of Agriculture, Irrigation and livestock (at provincial level)
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FSAC Food Security and Agriculture Cluster Afghanistan
IOM International Organization for Migration
MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock
NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NGO Nongovernmental Organization
NPO/RRA Rural Rehabilitation Association for Afghanistan
OCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
PIN People in Need
RAF Response Analysis Framework
SDO Sanayee Development Organization
SWHNO Shams Women’s Need and Help Organization
SC Save the Children
UN United Nations
WFP World Food Program
ZOA Zuidoost-Azië
Summary Report on Regional FSAC
Flood Preparedness and Livelihoods Workshops
A: Objectives of the workshop From March to May 2012, the Food Security and Agriculture Cluster (FSAC) conducted three (3) regional flood preparedness
workshops to develop livelihood based flood preparedness plans and develop a common understanding of livelihoods zoning and
response capacity of FSAC partners across Afghanistan. Beforehand, an initial national meeting was held in Kabul in early March with
heads of agencies and emergency coordinators of key FSAC partners to present the plan and request input into the process. The
objective of the workshops was to reinforce the capacity of the FSA community to provide improved responses to flood events within
Northern, Western and Eastern regions. Expected results encompassed the identification of the lost potentially flooded areas within
each region, the better understanding of both the local livelihoods and coping capacities to flood events. Outputs gathered
provincial maps targeting the potentially most flooded areas, the list of priority responses - including emergency, rehabilitation and
mitigation options- , a 3Ws excel file providing data about the local capacity of humanitarian actors, as well as regional maps of gaps
in response planning
Other sources of information
The FSAC initiative did not duplicate with other flood preparedness initiatives. At the provincial level, ANDMA has the responsibility
to coordinate emergency responses to rapid on-set hazards such as floods. At the regional level, OCHA develops a contingency
planning that encompasses food security. The latter provides an operational plan, including main contacts. Although most flood-
prone areas could be identified in each province, the workshop has not as an objective to provide figures about the population that
might most likely be affected by floods. We would recommend therefore the reader to refer to available information. iMMAP and
WFP have developed flood models and maps, using the same sources of information (NATO), while OCHA has produced a flood map
based on the experience of the past years.
B: Workshops process and methodology The selection of the regions was based on several criteria as the FSAC capacity to conduct workshops in the region (existence of a
FSAC regional cluster and plan to roll-out the cluster at the regional level), the likelihood of major flood events, and the security
conditions. FSAC was aware that needs are also acute in the South Eastern and North Eastern regions. The methodology gave high
consideration to working groups, so that FSAC was capable to capture local knowledge. Participants gathered representatives from
different type of agencies, including government authorities (ANDMA, DAIL), local NGOs, International NGOs, UN agencies, IFRC and
ARCS. Almost all participants were afghans, employed as fieldworkers as well as coordinators at the provincial and regional levels.
Each workshop lasted 1.5 day, and covered the below mentioned areas of investigation. For further information, please refer to the
detailed agenda as well as facilitating tools in appendices.
Session 1 - Presentation of the flood specific 3Ws tool: Each participating agency was sent the flood specific 3Ws tool and asked to provide their contribution by a few days before the starting date of the workshop. The objective was to provide the participants with a map that clearly shows the capacity and the geographical gaps to respond to a flood event at provincial level. A database has been elaborated on the basis of available information (3Ws map is attached in appendix 2. The map also displays information about accessibility at the district level. Areas qualified as inaccessible may have very restricted accessibility to district capital. A second map in appendix 3 provides information about the current locations of key staffs from agencies.
Session 2 – Identification of most flood prone areas: The second session was dedicated to the identification of flood prone areas. Provincial working groups divided each province in three (3) different zones, namely most flood prone, medium and less prone areas to flood. Their practical knowledge of the terrain has been key to split up provinces in areas. Output of the workshop is attached in appendix 4.
Session 3 – Identification of livelihood main patterns: For each single flood prone area, the participants were requested to provide, within provincial working groups, the main features of the local livelihoods. FSAC provided regional maps with livelihood zoning, that was produced thanks to the 2011 FEWSNET report. Main outputs of this session is attached in appendix 5.
Session 4 – Identification of potential impacts on livelihoods:
The analysis of the impact on livelihoods has been coupled with the identification of the response planning. FSAC, more particularly the RAF officer, had therefore prepared a facilitation tools providing examples on potential impacts on livelihoods. Outputs are attached in appendix 6.
Session 5 & 6 – Identification of potential responses (emergency, rehabilitation, mitigation):
During these two sessions, working groups were requested to list and rank the priority response options according to the livelihoods and the risks on the latter. For more details about the output of this session, please refer to appendix 7.
Session 7 – Presentation of existing disaster plans and gap analysis:
OCHA or ANDMA had different levels of preparations in the three workshops ; disaster plans were not always ready by the time of the events ; and therefore no gap analysis could be carried out.
Session 8 – Developing priority response plans:
Working groups were requested to develop the responses they identified as a priority. They could provide details about the expected number of beneficiaries, modalities of implementation, timeliness, list the experienced agencies. Appendix 8 provides extra information.
C: FSAC Response Capacity (summary of 3 Ws, narrative of main players and capacities, summary of gaps….) On the basis of the answers provided by the workshop participants, a database has been elaborated and provide a large range of
information. Its accuracy depends upon the number of quality of the responses received. A few significant NGOs did not participate
to the event, and data from missing NGOs has not been collected so far. FSAC is therefore aware there might be some discrepancies,
and will try refining information through regular communications with FSAC members. The database is posted to FSAC webpage to
facilitate the access to data to the most important number of FSAC partners. The latter will be able as well to contact FSAC
monitoring officer to ask for specific requests.
Who Works Where? Just a few questions were asked about the NGO’s presence at the district level: locations of the offices, districts covered by present
operations, districts covered by past operations. The below tables summarize main results for the north region. More information,
including for other eastern and Western regions are accessible through the flood-specific 3Ws.
Table: Example for the north region - Distribution of offices
The table is self explanatory. The province of Balkh is very well covered as most NGOs reporting having activities in the northern
province, have an office in Mazar-e-Sharif, province of Balkh. On the contrary, the remote provinces of Sari Pul and Faryab have a
lower NGO presence. ADEO, CoAR, Save the Children and ZOA reported having offices in three different provinces or more.
Agencies Balkh Sari Pul Samangan Jawzjan Faryab Total
ACTED 1 1
Action Aid 1 2 3
ADEO 2 2 2 6
Afghanaid 4 4
AREA 1 1
CoAR 3 3 5 11
DACCAR 4 4
IOM 1 1
PIN 6 3 9
SC 2 1 2 4 9
Solidarités 2 2
SWHNO 1 1 2
Tear Fund 1 1
WFP 1 1 2
ZOA 4 4 1 9
Total 27 8 11 8 11
Table: Example of the Northern Region - Number of districts covered by present operations in each province
Save The Children has a massive presence in the northern region, having current operations in 17 districts. People in Need, Solidarités International and ZOA reported intervening in at least 7 different districts. Considering the fact that WFP reports working in all provinces and all districts, there is no gap concerning emergency food distributions.
Agencies Balkh Saripul Samangan Jawzjan Faryab Total
ACTED 3 3
Action Aid 1 2 3
ADEO 2 1 2 5
Afghanaid 4 4
AREA 4 4
CoAR 2 3 5
DACAAR 5 5
People in need 5 3 8
SAVE the Children 1 1 7 8 17
Solidarités Int. 7 7
SWHNO 1 1 2
Tear Fund 3 3
ZOA 7 1 8
total 22 10 15 15 12
Who does what in terms of emergency preparedness? Data concerning the capacity of emergency preparedness has also been assessed throughout the flood specific 3Ws tool for the three
(3) regions. FSAC members were asked to report on their activities about contingency planning, disaster-risk reduction and early
warning. They were also kindly requested to provide data about staffs that received training in emergency assessments and
responses. As a contribution to an improved emergency preparedness mechanism, FSAC will build upon the data collected and
organize upcoming events at the regional level, to upgrade capacities of FSAC partners. An operational plan will soon be developed to
this regard.
Please find below the list of agencies present in the Northern Region – as an example - that reported having capacities and activities
in the fields of emergency preparedness:
# Agencies Trained staffs in rapid
Early warning Contingency
planning Disaster Risk Reduction
(DRR) Assessment Response
1 ACTED X X X X
2 Action Aid X x X
3 ADEO x X
4 Afghanaid x X X x X
5 AHDAA X X X X X
6 AREA X X X X
7 CoAR x X x X
8 DACAAR x X
9 IOM x X
10 PIN x X x X
11 NPO/RRA x X
12 Save the Children x X X X X
13 SDO X
14 Solidarités Int. x X
14 SWHNO X
15 Tearfund x X X X
16 WFP x x X X
17 World Vision x
Who does what in terms of emergency response? In the event of a major rapid-on set disaster that goes beyond provincial capacities, information collected through the flood specific
tool will be supportive to mobilize relevant agencies so that they can upscale their activities and provide support if they agree to do
so. Data about the coverage area for each single agency has been collected and mapped (see in appendix) in the three (3) regions. As
an example, in the tables below are summarized a few information about office locations and interventions areas.
Only six agencies plus WFP reported being capable to respond to emergencies, in the five days following a hazard. Considering the
geographical coverage, Save the Children is key in all related activities, as reported it could intervene where others do not have a
presence. Please refer to maps in appendices for more detailed information.
Table: Number of beneficiaries reported as assisted within 5 days – Example of the Northern Region.
Agencies Food distribution Water trucking Distribution of inputs
ACTED 4 districts*1500 - -
Action Aid 2 districts*200 2 districts*3000 -
AREA 12 districts*1000 12 districts*3000 12 districts*750
CoAR 12 districts*500 7 districts* up to 1800 11 districts*750
SC - 8 districts* 2000 -
SWHNO 2 districts*100 2 districts*200 2 districts*100
The database provide refined information district by district, as well as data concerning the access to areas, the capacity of available
warehouses. In appendices, the reader will find maps about emergency preparedness and response. They encompass the coverage
per district in terms of contingency planning, early warning and DRR for preparedness; as well as distributions for response.
Table: example of the Northern Region - Number of districts covered by post emergency response
Agencies Cash For Work Cash grants &
Vouchers Feeding program
Animal feed, stocking/ destocking
ACTED - 5 - -
Action Aid 3 1 - 1
ADEO 5 - - -
Afghanaid 2 - - 5
AREA 7 3 4 -
CoAR 9 7 7 4
PIN 11 11 - 4
SC 23 6 - -
Solidarités 1 - - -
Tear Fund 4 1 - -
WFP - 9 - -
ZOA 2 - - 1
D: Emergency preparedness plan outline The outputs of the workshops provides answers to different types of needs. As mentioned earlier, some districts are just covered by
WFP and not by any other agency. Despite the capacity of the latter to respond anywhere to emergency food needs, many necessary
activities related to contingency planning, disaster risk reduction and early warning cannot be therefore addressed as properly as if
there were a continuous presence. In addition, needs for mitigation and early warning interventions have been suggested by the
provincial working groups during the workshop.
The workshop is a first stage of the process, that will go on with actions to remedy identify gaps at the district level. A refined analysis
of the situation should now be carried out to this regard, to understand the gaps between the identified needed response options
and the current capacity of existing NGOs to cover them, in terms of expertise and funding. Main conclusions from this refined
analysis will support the drafting of a advocacy document, a useful tool to link with longer-term options and early recovery.
Response options depend upon the livelihoods in each single district. In the appendices, a map summarizes the main findings to this
regards. Please refer to appendices 6, 7 and 8.
Conclusion This workshop provided the opportunity for officers from different provinces and agencies to share their views about flood
preparedness and response, and get a comprehensive picture about the current situation. Yet, the information produced is valuable
and is definitely supportive towards its mission of supporting emergency preparedness and response.
APPENDIX I: List of participants 1.1. Western Region List of Participants
Western Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants List
No. Province Agency Name Position
1 Hirat RAADA M. Hassan Program Manager
2 Hirat OCHA Shahrokh Humanitarian Affairs Officer
3 Hirat WFP Elrashid Head of WFP Area Office
4 Hirat WFP Sheerin Noori National Program Officer
5 Hirat AHDAA Engu. M. Yousaf Deputy Director
6 Hirat AHDAA Ahmad Tareq Marketing Officer
7 Hirat CAID Eng. M. Yaqoob Sr. Program Officer
8 Hirat CAID Waheed Ahmad Program Officer
9 Hirat Worldvision Nazir Sr. Commodities Officer
10 Hirat SDO Sayed Maroof Program Officer
11 Hirat SDO Farhad EH Officer
12 Hirat RWDOA Ahmad Farid Executive Director
13 Hirat RWDOA Moh. Yousaf Livelihood Program Coordinator
14 Hirat ARAA Dr. Sebghatullah Program Manager
15 Hirat DAIL Dr. Ahmad Zai Deputy Director of DAIL
16 Hirat CHA Amanullah Monitoring Officer
17 Hirat SDO Wahidullah Project Manager
18 Hirat IRC Amir M & E Officer
19 Hirat IFRC Dr. M. Maroof Program Officer
20 Hirat ARCS M. Nader DM
21 Hirat ARCS M. Naser Member of DRU
22 Hirat CRDSA Gh.Yahya
23 Hirat CRDSA Faez
24 Hirat AREA Eng. Raqeeb Regional Manager
25 Hirat NPO/RRAA Sayed Masoud Master Trainer
26 Hirat WDOA Shaima Project Officer
27 Hirat FAO Hirat Nabi Gul RCO
28 Hirat FAO Hirat Salim Faiz Assistant
29 Hirat FAO Hirat Aziz Ahmad Assistant
30 Hirat WDOA Khadija Field Officer
31 Herat DAIL Basir Ahmad Head of Plant Protection Department
32 Herat DAIL Abd. Aziz Head of Natural Resources Department
33 Hirat DAIL Tariq Head of Plans and programs, Facilitator
34 Ghor ANDMA Hamid Director
35 Ghor CAID partner M. Zarif Provincial Manager
36 Ghor CAID partner Dr. M. Saber IPMPL Project Manager
37 Ghor Worldvision Norulhaq Project Assitant
38 Ghor RWDOA Juma Khan Field Program Coordinator
39 Ghor ARAA Said Naeem Field Monitor
40 Ghor ARCS Nooradin DM
41 Ghor ARCS Aref Member
42 Ghor DAIL Faridudin Director of DAIL
43 Ghor DAIL Abd. Samad Head of Planning and Programs
44 Ghor CRS Abdul Malik Team Leader
45 Badghis ANDMA Aimaq Director
46 Badghis Worldvision Barekzay Sr. Zone Manager
47 Badghis ARCS Sefullah DM
48 Badghis ARCS Nasim Member
49 Badghis DAIL Zemari Head of Extension Department
50 Badghis DAIL Abdul wakil Head of Planning Department
51 Farah ANDMA Ayobi Director
52 Farah RWDOA Moh. Saleh Field Program Coordinator
53 Farah ARCS G. Rasool HQ.ARCS
54 Farah ARCS Mosa DM
55 Kabul FAO/FSAC Ulfatullah Malangyar National Food Security Officer
56 Kabul FAO/FSAC Sediqullah Rahmati Food Security Analyst
57 Kabul FAO/FSAC Dr. Abdul Basir IM/M&E Officer
1.2. Northern Region List of Participants
Northern Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants List
S/N Province Organization Name Title 1 Balkh Acted Khalil Ahmad BM
2 Balkh Action Aid Kanishka PO
3 Balkh ARCS Haji M. Yaseen DM Officer
4 Balkh Save the children
Dr. Dawood M& E
5 Balkh IOM Zabiullah R.F.O
6 Balkh IOM Eng. Kakar RFO
7 Balkh ARCS Abdul Hamid DM
8 Balkh PIN Ehsan DPM
9 Balkh DACAAR Eng. Ab. Wali Regional Manager
10 Balkh Action Aid Arash Payeez Program Officer
11 Balkh SWNHO Abdul Zubir Officer
12 Balkh Johannitor Ashutosh Project Coordinator
13 Balkh Johannitor Dr. Rohullah Noori Training Coordinator
14 Balkh ANDMA Sayed Ishaq Mitigation Manager
15 Balkh Save the Children
Dr. Fahim DRR Officer
16 Balkh AREA Ajmal Nil
17 Balkh Save the children
Ghulam Sakhi DRR Manager
18 Balkh WFP M. Masoud Saqib NPO
19 Balkh ADEO S. Abdul Tawab
20 Balkh UNHCR UNHCR Sr. Field Associate
21 Balkh WFP Sven Thelin Program Officer
22 Faryab DACAAR Aminulhaq Regional Manager
23 Faryab ACTED Faiz Mohmammd PO
24 Faryab DAIL Assadullah Bahar Director
25 Faryab SWNHO Saltanat Kohi Director
26 Faryab ANDMA Haji-Abdulwahab
27 Faryab SWHNO Nabil
28 Faryab Save the Children
Eng. Ab.Rahim Sr. Officer
29 Faryab Save the Children
Eng. M. Rasool Officer
30 Faryab DAIL Assadullah Director
31 Jawzjan Action Aid Abdul Khaliq PO
32 Jawzjan Action Aid Shukrullah PO
33 Jawzjan Tear Fund Shafie P1M
34 Jawzjan ANDMA Eng. Aziz Director
35 Jawzjan DAIL Abdul Rashid Director
36 Jawzjan ARCS Ghulam Sakhi DM Officer
37 Jawzjan Save the children
Ghulam M. F Sr. Officer
38 Jawzjan Save the Children
Shukrullah DRR Officer
39 Jawzjan ZOA Ghulam Sakhi PM
40 Jawzjan Save the Children
Soria Officer
41 province ARCS Abdul M DM valinter
42 Samangan ARCS Samiuddin DM Officer
43 Samangan solidarity Bashir Ahmad ERM AM
44 Samangan Afghanaid Saifullah P.C
45 Samangan solidarity Author ERM PM
46 Saripul ARCS M. Younas DM Officer
47 Saripul Save the Children
Dr. Khan Agha DRR Sr. Officer
48 Saripul ZOA Eng. Parwana M & E Officer
49 Saripul ANDMA Sayed Fazlullah Director
50 Saripul COAR G. Yahya Field Officer
1.3. Eastern Region List of Participants
Eastern Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants
S/N Province Agency Name Position
1 Nangarhar ADA Sardar Wali Extention worker
2 Nangarhar WFP M. Fahim Field Monitor
3 Nangarhar UNOCHA Jamal Naser Rafiqi HAO
4 Nangarhar FAO Jalalabad Khushal Asifi OIC
5 Nangarhar FAO Jalalabad Shahwali RFA
6 Nangarhar UNHCR Abdul Wali Sr. Field Assistant
7 Nangarhar ANDMA Sayed Naser Finance/HR
8 Nangarhar IRC Abdul Ghafar HP Officer
9 Nangarhar IRC Shafiullah M& E Officer
10 Nangarhar FGA Sardar Wali Master Trainer
11 Nangarhar FGA Haroon Rashid NSP Design Engineer
12 Nangarhar FGA Obaidullah Sherzai Master Trainer
13 Nangarhar IFRC S. Amin IFRC
14 Nangarhar ANDMA Dr. Rahmat Gul Dasister Officer
15 Nangarhar MADERA M. Yousaf M& E Officer
16 Nangarhar DAIL Abdul Ahad NA
17 Nangarhar SOFAR Mashal Khan Admin
18 Nangarhar DACAAR Gul Makhan Field Coordinator
19 Nangarhar SHPOUL Shafiullah Shahab Director
20 Nangarhar SHPOUL Walayat shah PC
21 Nangarhar IOM Anwarullah Regional Field Offcier
22 Nangarhar DAIL Ataulhaq Bashari Plan & policy Director
23 Nangarhar ANDMA S. Yaqob Pacha Mitigation Offcier
24 Nangarhar ANDMA Abdul Wahab Director
25 Nangarhar ARCS M. Iqbal Regional Director
26 Nangarhar ADA Asadullah Amini FS Officer
27 Laghman ANDMA M. Naim Nazari Director
28 Laghman DAIL Farhadullah Planning Officer
29 Laghman SADAAT Ajmal Field Officer
30 Laghman DAIL M. Ayoub Forestry Department Head
31 Laghman ABM Khalid Safi Program Officer
32 Laghman IOM Ahmad Fawad Field Assistan
33 Laghman ARCS Dr. Abdul Ghafar Director
34 Kunar SOFAR Firdos Khan OIC SOFAR
35 Kunar IOM Zabihullah Field Assistan
36 Kunar ANDMA Ghulam Ali Director
37 Kunar DAIL Fazal Rahman Extention worker
38 Kunar DAIL Eng. Mohasal Director
39 Nuristan ANDMA M. Afag Barizy Director
40 Nuristan DAIL Hazrat Omer Agriculture Officer
41 Kabul FAO/FSAC Ulfatullah Malangyar National Food Security Officer
42 Kabul FAO/FSAC Sediqullah Rahmati Food Security Analyst
APENDIXE II and III: MAPS Of 3Ws
2.1 Western Region Maps of 3Ws
2.2 Northern Region Maps of 3Ws
2.2 Eastern Region Maps of 3Ws
APENDIXEIII: Flood Risk Maps
3.1. Western Region Map of Flood Risk Zones
3.2. Northern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones
3.3. Eastern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones
APPENDIX VI: Impact on livelihood and Flood Contingency Planning: Response Options Analysis Matrix
4.1. Western Region
Province: Herat Zone: (High) Districts:Farsi, Zenda Jan, Chesht, Gulran
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Food storage . NFI kit . Protection wall . First Aid kits . Potable water
. Area is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. Internet available
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. DAIL
. ARCS
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. Cash
. Food storage
. NFI Kits
. Protection wall
. Potable water
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution . Cash transfer . Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA
. WFP . FAO . Local people support
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Voucher
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Potable water
. First Aid Kits
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP . FAO . ANDMA . Donor agencies . NGOs . Government
. Accessible
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Voucher
. Seeds
. Fodder
. FFW
Province: Herat Zone: (Medium) Districts: Rubat Sangi, Pashtoon Zarghon, Kashk Kohna
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production
. Protect crops from flood impact. . Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Food storage . NFI kit . Protection wall . First Aid kits . Potable water
. Area is secure . Accessible . Phone available . Internet available
. WFP
. FAO
. ARCS
. DAIL
. ANDMA
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. NFI Kits
. Protection wall
. Potable water
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock . Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution . Cash transfer . Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA
. WFP . FAO . Local people support
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Potable water
. First Aid Kits
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. Donor agencies
. NGOs
. Government
. Accessible some not
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Seeds
. Fodder
. FFW
. First Aid Kits
Province: Herat Zone: (Low) District: Ghoryan, Adraskan, Kahan, Awoba, Guzara, Enjel, Shendand
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Food storage . NFI kit . Protection wall . First Aid kits . Potable water
. Area is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. Internet available
. WFP
. FAO
. ARCS
. DAIL
. ANDMA
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. NFI Kits
. Protection wall
. Potable water
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA
. WFP . FAO . Local people support
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Handcraft
. Crop
. Business
. Gardening
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Potable water . First Aid Kits . Seeds . Fodder . CFF . FFW . Cash grant
. Area is secure
. accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. Donor agencies
. NGOs
. Government
. Accessible some not
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Seeds
. Fodder
. FFW
Province: Ghor Zone: (High) Districts: Shahrak, Tolak, Saghar, Taiwara, Pasaband, Charsada Date: 3 April 2012
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. Daily wage
. Shopkeeper
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Tree plantation against risk
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Protection wall . Food storage . Tree plantation . Avoid forest cutting . DRR . NFI Kit
. Partially is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Access to market
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Early Warning system
. Food storage
. DRR
. NFI Kit
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Source at hand
. Loans
. Environmental assistance
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Migration
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Transfer of affect people to safe place . Fodder . Medication
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Access to market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Medication
. Potable water
. Fodder
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Construction projects
. Area is not secure
. Partially accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Seeds
. Irrigation Canal construction . Shelter . CFW
Province: Ghor Zone: (Medium) Districts: Du layan, Chaghcharan, Dawlat Yar, Lal
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. Daily wage
. Shopkeeper
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Tree plantation against risk
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Protection wall . Food storage . Tree plantation . Avoid forest cutting . DRR . NFI Kit . Green area
. Partially is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Access to market
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Early Warning system
. Protection of green area
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Source at hand
. Loans
. Environmental assistance
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Migration
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Medication
. shelter
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Access to market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Cash
. Food distribution
. shelter
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Construction projects
. Area is not secure
. Partially accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Seeds
. CFW
Province: Ghor Zone: (Low) District: Du layan, Chaghcharan, Dawlat Yar, Lal
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. Daily wage
. Shopkeeper
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Tree plantation against risk
. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . Protection wall . Food storage . Tree plantation . Avoid forest cutting . DRR . NFI Kit . Green area
. Partially is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Access to market
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Early Warning system
. Protection of green area
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Source at hand
. Loans
. Environmental assistance
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Migration
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Medication
. shelter
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO . Afghan Aid . CRS
. Access to market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Cash
. Food distribution
. shelter
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Construction projects
. Area is not secure
. Partially accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. ACF
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Seeds
. CFW
Province: Badghis Zone: (High) Districts: Qalai Now, Qadis, Marghab
Province: Badghis Zone: (Medium) Districts: Jawan, Abger
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Handcraft
. Crop
. loss of livelihood . No income from own production
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. Food storage
. NFI kit storage
. Protection wall
. Area is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. Internet available
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. Food storage
. NFI storage
. Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood . No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. Not accessible
. Phone accessible
. Rescue committee by the government . ANDMA . WFP . FAO
. Not accessible
. Food not available
. Prices are too high
. Kind
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Handcraft
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds
. Potable water
. Medical assistance
. Shelter
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Area is secure
. Phone available
.Partially accessible
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. some parts of accessible some not . less food available . Prices are high . Cash
. Shelter
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Handcraft
. Crop
. loss of livelihood . No income from own production
. Protect crops from
flood impact. . Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. Food storage
. NFI kit storage
. Protection wall
. Area is secure . Accessible . Phone available . Internet available
. WFP . FAO . ANDMA
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. Food storage . NFI storage . Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock . Daily wage . Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution . Cash transfer . Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. Not accessible
. Phone accessible
. Rescue committee by the government . ANDMA . WFP . FAO
. Not accessible
. Food not available
. Prices are too high
. Kind
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Handcraft
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds
. Potable water . Medical assistance . Shelter . Seeds . Fodder . CFF . FFW . Cash grant
. Area is secure
. Phone available
.Partially accessible
. WFP . FAO . ANDMA
. some parts of accessible some not . less food available . Prices are high . Cash
. Shelter
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
Province: Badghis Zone: (Low) District: Maqar
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Handcraft
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. Food storage
. NFI kit storage
. Protection wall
. Area is secure
. Accessible
. Phone available
. Internet available
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. Accessible
. Food available
. Prices are not high
. Voucher
. Food storage
. NFI storage
. Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. Agencies contribution
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Transfer of affect people to safe place
. Area is secure
. Not accessible . . Phone accessible
. Rescue committee by the government . ANDMA . WFP . FAO
. Not accessible
. Food not available
. Prices are too high
. Kind
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
Agriculture . Livestock . Daily wage . Handcraft
. No income from own production . No work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds
. Potable water
. Medical assistance
. Shelter
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Area is secure
. Phone available
.Partially accessible
. WFP
. FAO
. ANDMA
. some parts of accessible some not . less food available . Prices are high . Cash
. Seeds
. Fodder
. CFF
. FFW
Province: Farah Zone: (High) Districts: Purchaman, Anar Dara
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. NFI kit
. Protection wall
. First Aid kits . Food storage . Tree plantation
. centre of the district is secure . No Accessible . Phone available
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS
. Government
. No market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Tree plantation
. Early Warning system
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Agencies contribution
. Agriculture
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Food high prices
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Transfer of affect people to safe place . Potable water . Fodder . Shelter . Livestock . NFI kit . Medication
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Voucher
. Food distribution
. Medication
. Potable water
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Protection wall
. Livestock
. NFI Kit
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Canal construction
. Reinforcing river banks
. Protecting agriculture lands
. Cash Transfer
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Seeds
. Irrigation Canal construction . Reinforcing river banks . Protecting agriculture lands . Cash Transfer
Province: Farah Zone: (Medium) Districts: Shebkoh, Gulistan, Balabolok, Markaz Farah, Khaksafed, Pusht Koh Qalai Ka
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. NFI kit
. Protection wall
. First Aid kits . Food storage . Tree plantation
. centre of the district is secure . No Accessible . Phone available
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS
. Government
. No market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Tree plantation
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Agencies contribution
. Agriculture
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Food high prices
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Potable water
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Livestock
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Voucher
. Food distribution
. NFI Kit
. Shelter
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Food distribution
. Canal construction
. Reinforcing river banks
. Protecting agriculture lands
. Cash Transfer
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Cash Transfer
. Seeds
Province: Farah Zone: (Low) District: Bakwa, Lash juween
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Agriculture
. Gardening
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . less food
. Protect crops from flood impact.
. Awareness raising
. Creation of volunteers committees
. Early Warning system
. NFI kit
. Protection wall
. First Aid kits . Food storage . Tree plantation
. centre of the district is secure . No Accessible . Phone available
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS
. Government
. No market
. No enough Food available
. Prices are high
. Cash
. Tree plantation
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Agencies contribution
. Agriculture
. loss of livelihood
. No income from own production . No work opportunity . Food high prices
. Support purchasing and income level . Increase accessibility to market
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. Potable water
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Livestock
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Accessible
. No enough Food available
. Prices are too high
. Voucher
. Food distribution
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Daily wage
. No income from own production . less work opportunity
. Enable access to seeds and fertilizer . Increase access to business
. Seeds
. CFF
. FFW
. Cash grant banks . Protecting agriculture lands . Cash Transfer
. Area is not secure
. No accessible
. Phone accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. PRT
. ANDMA
. ARCS . Government . FAO
. Possible Accessible
. Less food available
. Prices are high
. Voucher
. Cash Transfer
. Seeds
4.1. Northern Region
Province Flood zone District Is the area is secure? Do agencies have the capacity to response at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/voucher or in kind.
Responses recommended
Samangan
Zone -1 Royi Doab No security problem. Difficult access during rainfall
Pre-Disaster Solidarity (small), ARCS(small) Afghan Aid (medium) Early warning group Post-Disaster Helvetas ( water sheet management) Solidarity (NSP emergency assessment) NFI. UNOPS (Access-Road clearance) FAO-seed distribution DAIL-seed distribution. WFP? IOM –NFI-assessment advocacy. ARCS -NFI
CFW FFW
Mitigation Project Protection wall Canal rehabilitation Seed distribution Seedling plantation Reforesting Early Warning system development, NRM and Water sheet management
Zone-2 Dari-e-Suf Nil Nil Nil Nil
Zone-3
Khuram Wa Sarbagh Nil Nil Nil Nil
Faryab
Zone -1
Garzewan Balcheragh Pashtoonkot Khowajasubzpoosh Sherentagab
Yes
Pre-disaster Save the Children ,ACTED, WFP, NRC, MRRD, DAIL, ARCS, ANDMA Post-disaster All NGOs according to their capacity. Coordination has the ability to response.
The existing market has the capacity of 20% response
Food NFI FFW
Zone-2
Maimana city Almar Qaisar Kohistan
Area is relatively secure, only road access to Kohistan district is closed since six months.
Pre-disaster: DoRR, PVA, PCA, PADR. Post-disaster: All NGOs according to their capacity. Coordination has the ability to response.
The existing market has the capacity of response FFW CFW
Zone-3
Qaramqol Andkhoi Khan Charbagh Ghormach
Security is good except Ghormach district
Pre-disaster: DoRR, PVA, PCA, PADR. Post-disaster: All NGOs according to their capacity. Coordination has the ability to response.
Market in Ankhoi is ok and in other districts is no. FFW
Balkh
Zone-1 Shortepa & Kaldar Secure and accessible
Pre-disaster: AAA, SVC, WFP, IOM, Johaniter, NRC, ARCS, ANDMA Post-disaster: AAA, SVC, WFP, IOM, Johaniter, NRC, ARCS, ANDMA
There is no market in Shortepa district Market is good in Kaldar district
Food, Shelter, IGA, MEI program Good coordination, identifying beneficiaries, & DRR, need assessment of community, conducted FA training . Food, NFI, medical treatment, capacity building, DRR.
Zone-2
Chimtal Kishindih Zari Sholgara
Chimtal is insecure at some level the remaining is ok.
Pre-disaster: ACTED, PIN, ICRC, ARCS, BDN Market is available with good capacity. ICRC & ARCS has access to insecure areas, potential actor available to access in this area. CFW, FFW, Cash for training, IGA
Zone-3 Nahri Shahi, Khulum Both districts are secure Pre-disaster: Johanniter, GTZ, ACTED, ADEO, ARCS, SRP, ICRC, WFP, CHA, Save the children
Sufficient market is available CFW, FFW, Voucher, IGA,
Saripul
Zone-1 Sozma Qala Yes, all the roads are open Experience staff available, limited NFI No good market, necessary items should be imported to these districts
Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI, road maintenance,
Zone-2 Balkhab Yes, but roads are closed Experience staff available, limited NFI No good market, necessary items should be imported to these districts
Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI, road maintenance,
Zone-3 Sayad Kohistan Saripul
No enough security and all the roads are closed
Experience staff available, limited NFI No good market, necessary items should be imported to these districts
Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI. NGOs staff need security to do response analysis.
Jawzjan
Zone-1
Shibirghan, Darzab, Qushtepa, Faizabad, Aqcha, Mardyan, Kham Ab, Qarian
Yes Pre-disaster: many NGOs are working, DRR, Early warning system
Good market capacity Involving CDC, rapid need assessment, training to communities, ARCS volunteer training, Early warning system, DRR.
Zone-2 KhowaJa Du Koh Yes Post disaster: rapid assessment, Food and NFI distribution, first aid kits, shelter, seeds, animal feed, advocacy
Good market
On time attention to response Avoid lots of paper works UN-OCHA must coordinate and support NGOs, Donor immediate response
Zone-3 Khaniqa Yes Post disaster: rapid assessment, Food and NFI distribution, first aid kits, shelter, seeds, animal feed, advocacy
Good market
On time attention to response Avoid lots of paper works UN-OCHA must coordinate and support NGOs, Donor immediate response
4.2. Eastern Region
Province: Nangarhar Zone: (High) Districts :(Khogiani, Pachir wa Agam, Kot, Deh Bala, Achin, Surkhrod, Spin Ghar, Kama, Mohmandara, Beh Sud, Dari Noor, Kuz Kunar) Date: May 8, 2012
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. Business
. Agriculture
. Water resources
. Infrastructures
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. DRR
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Discharge monitoring system
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WFP . FAO . IOM . ARCS . IRC . NRC . UNHCR
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Forestry Rehabilitation . Check dams . Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. loss of assets . No income . Unemployment . Shortage of food items . Shortage of NFI . No potable water . No shelter
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. First Medical kits
. Potable water
. Rescue committee
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. WFP
. FAO
. IOM
. ARCS
. IRC
. NRC . UNHCR . ICRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. First Medical kits
. Potable water
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Shelter
. Area is Secure partially . Mobile working . Partially Accessible . No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. NRC
. ARCS
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Shelter
Province: Nangarhar Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Hisarak, Sherzad, Chaparhar, Nazian, Durbaba, Ghani Khil, Bati Kot)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. Business
. Agriculture
. Water resources
. Infrastructures
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items . less income . Unemployment . Disease spreading . Transportation problems . Houseless . No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. DRR
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Discharge monitoring system
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. FAO
. IOM
. ARCS
. IRC
. NRC
. UNHCR
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Forestry Rehabilitation . Check dams . Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. loss of assets . No income . Unemployment . Shortage of food items . Shortage of NFI . No potable water . No shelter
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. First Medical kits
. Potable water
. Rescue committee
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. WFP
. FAO
. IOM
. ARCS
. IRC
. NRC . UNHCR . ICRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. IGA kit
. Shelter
. Area is Secure partially . Mobile working . Partially Accessible . No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. NRC
. ARCS
. Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. IGA kit
. Shelter
Province: Nangarhar Zone: (Low) District: (Ghoshta, Lal Pur)
Province: Laghman Zone: (High) Districts: (Alishang – Mihtarlam – Qarghayee) Date: 8 May 2012
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items . less income . Unemployment . Disease spreading . Transportation problems . Houseless . No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. Awareness raising
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Pre-positioning
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA . ARCS . IRC . RRD . DAIL
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Check dams . Protection wall . Food storage building
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Loan
. Sources at hand
. NGOs assistance
. loss of assets
. No income
. Unemployment
. Shortage of food items
. Shortage of NFI
. No potable water
. No shelter
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. First Medical kit
. Potable water
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. ANDMA
. IRC
. WFP
. RRD
. UNHCR
. IOM
. ARCS
. DAIL
. IFRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Shelter
. First Medical Kit
. Fodder
. Potable water
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. NGOs assistance
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances . Job opportunity
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. DAIL
. IOM
. RRD
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. Business
. Agriculture
. Water resources
. Infrastructures
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items . less income . Unemployment . Disease spreading . Transportation problems . Houseless . No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. DRR
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WFP
. FAO
. IOM
. ARCS
. IRC
. NRC
. UNHCR
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Forestry Rehabilitation . Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. loss of assets
. No income
. Unemployment
. Shortage of food items
. Shortage of NFI
. No potable water
. No shelter
.Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment .Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Shelter
. First Medical kits
. Potable water
. Rescue committee
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. WFP
. FAO
. IOM
. ARCS
. IRC
. NRC . UNHCR . ICRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Livestock
. Crops
. UN Assistances
. Gov Assistances
. NGOs Assistances
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. NRC
. ARCS
. Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. Cash grant
. CFW
. FFW
Province: Laghman Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Alingar)
Province: Laghman Zone: (Low) District: (Dawlatshah)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items . less income . Unemployment . Disease spreading . Transportation problems . Houseless . No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. Awareness raising
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Pre-positioning
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA . ARCS . IRC . RRD . DAIL
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Check dams . Protection wall . Food storage building
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Loan
. Sources at hand
. NGOs assistance
. loss of assets
. No income
. Unemployment
. Shortage of food items
. Shortage of NFI
. No potable water
. No shelter
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. First Medical kit
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. ANDMA
. IRC
. WFP
. RRD
. UNHCR
. IOM
. ARCS
. DAIL
. IFRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. NGOs assistance
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances . Job opportunity
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. DAIL
. IOM
. RRD
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Shortage of food items . less income . Unemployment . Disease spreading . Transportation problems . Houseless . No potable water
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. Awareness raising
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Shelter
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. Pre-positioning
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. ANDMA . ARCS . IRC . RRD . DAIL
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Early warning system . Check dams . Protection wall . Food storage building
During Disaster (1st
phase emergency)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. Loan
. Sources at hand
. NGOs assistance
. loss of assets
. No income
. Unemployment
. Shortage of food items
. Shortage of NFI
. No potable water
. No shelter
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. First Medical kit
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. Not internet
. ANDMA
. IRC
. WFP
. RRD
. UNHCR
. IOM
. ARCS
. DAIL
. IFRC
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Rescue committee
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Shelter
. First Medical Kit
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Crops
. Livestock
. Natural Resources
. Daily wage
. NGOs assistance
. No seeds for cultivation
. Loss of livestock
. No irrigation system
. Houses damages
. No potable water
. No fertilizer
. No income
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances . Job opportunity
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. Irrigation system
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. FAO
. WFP
. DAIL
. IOM
. RRD
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Cash grant
Province: Kunar Zone: (High) Districts: (Chapa Dara, Peach, Wata pur, Asmar, Naria, Chawkay, Dangam)
Province: Kunar Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Nurgal, Sarkani, Khas Kunar, Narang, Marawara, Shigal, Ghazi Abad)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. Forests protection
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. improving agriculture
. Fertilizer
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. PRT
. FAO
. DAIL
. RRD
. USAID
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Protection wall
. Check dams
. Food storage
. Early warning
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Shelter
. NFI kit
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Rescue committee
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Opening of closed roads
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR . USAID . PRT
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Opening of closed roads
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Shelter
. Communication system
. Forests protection
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. improving agriculture
. Fertilizer
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. PRT
. FAO
. DAIL
. RRD
. USAID
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Protection wall
. Check dams
. Food storage
. Early warning
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Shelter
. NFI kit
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Rescue committee
. Fodder
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Business
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR . USAID . PRT
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Business
Province: Kunar Zone: (Low) District: (Asad Abad center of Kunar province)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Crops protection . employment opportunity . Shelter . Communication system . Forests protection
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Food storage
. Check dams
. Protection wall
. improving agriculture
. Fertilizer
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. PRT
. FAO
. DAIL
. RRD
. USAID
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices good
. Voucher
. Protection wall
. Check dams
. Early warning
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. loss of crops
. loss of business
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR
. No Access to market
. No Commodities
. Prices are high
. in kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. Shelter
. NFI kit
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Crops
. Livestock
. Business
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. loss of crops
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Area is Secure
. Mobile working
. Accessible
. No internet
. WHO
. WFP
. ARCS
. IOM
. RRD
. UNHCR . USAID . PRT
. Access to market
. Commodities
. Prices are high
. Kind
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Cash grant
. Fertilizer
. Forestry rehabilitation
Province: Nuristan Zone: (High) Districts : (Noorgaram, Waigal, Kamdish)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favour
cash/vouchers or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Communication system
. Forests protection
. reinforcement of irrigation system
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Food storage
. Trees plantation
. Protection wall
. improving agriculture
. Gardens protection
. Road construction
. Area relatively is Secure . Mobile working partially . Accessible . No internet
. No humanitarian agencies in this stage
. No market
. Kind
. Early warning
. Food storage
. Protection wall
. Road construction
. Trees plantation
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Government assistance
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. loss of people
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area relatively is Secure . Mobile working partially . Accessible . No internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC
. ARCS
. No market
. Kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. NFI kit
. Shelter
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Area relatively is Secure . Mobile working partially . Accessible . No internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC . ARCS . DAIL . FAO . IFHOPE
. No market
. Kind
. Voucher
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Livestock
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Gardening
Province: Nuristan Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Dowab, Mandol, Wama)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favor cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Communication system
. Forests protection
. reinforcement of irrigation system
. Early warning
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Food storage
. Trees plantation
. Protection wall
. improving agriculture
. Gardens protection
. Road construction
. Area is not secure
. No access
. Mobile working partially . No Internet
. No humanitarian agencies in this stage
. No market
. Kind
. Early warning
. Food storage
. Protection wall . Road Construction . Trees plantation
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Government assistance
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. loss of people
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area is not secure
. No access
. Mobile working partially . No internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC
. ARCS
. DAIL
. No market
. Kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. NFI kit
. Shelter
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Livestock
. Area is not secure
. No access
. Mobile working partially . No Internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC . ARCS . DAIL . FAO . IFHOPE
. No market
. Kind
. Voucher
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Livestock
. Forestry rehabilitation
Province: Nuristan Zone: (Low) District :(Bargi Matal, Paroon)
Phases Livelihood
Component Impact on livelihood
Key issues to be addressed
Possible response options
Is the Area secure?
For each response option, do agencies have the
capacity to respond at scale?
Market dynamics favor cash/vouchers
or in kind
Response Recommendation
Before Disaster (Mitigation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Crops protection
. employment opportunity
. Communication system
. Forests protection
. reinforcement of irrigation system
. Early warning . Forestry rehabilitation . Food storage . Trees plantation . Protection wall . improving agriculture . Gardens protection . Road construction
. Area is not secure . No access . Mobile working partially . No Internet
. No humanitarian agencies in this stage
. No market . Kind
. Early warning
. Food storage
. Protection wall
During Disaster (1
st phase
emergency)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Government assistance
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. loss of people
. Transportation of affected HH to the safe place . Rapid assessment . Deployment of emergency assistance
. Food distribution
. Potable water
. Doctors mobile team
. Cash transfer
. NFI kit
. Fodder
. Shelter
. Rescue committee
. Area is not secure
. No access
. Mobile working partially . No internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC
. ARCS
. DAIL
. No market
. Kind
. Cash
. Food distribution
. NFI kit
. Shelter
. Cash transfer
After Disaster (Recovery or Rehabilitation)
. Agriculture
. Livestock
. Gardening
. Forestry
. Crops
. Shortage of food items
. less income
. Unemployment
. Disease spreading
. Transportation problems
. Houseless
. loss of livestock
. loss of crops
. loss of irrigation system
. Considering the irrigation system . Agriculture improvements . Distribution of assistances
. Seeds distribution
. Fertilizer
. CFW
. FFW
. Infrastructures
. Forestry rehabilitation
. Cash grant
. IGA tool kits
. Livestock . Road construction
. Area is not secure
. No access
. Mobile working partially . No Internet
. IOM
. WFP
. ANDMA
. DRRD
. ICRC . ARCS . DAIL . FAO . IFHOPE
. No market
. Kind
. Voucher
. Seeds distribution
. CFW
. FFW
. Livestock . Road construction
APPENDIX V: Option for Mitigation and Priorities
5.1. Western Region
5.2. Northern Region
5.2. Easter Region
APENDIXE VI: Tables of response planning
6.1. Western Region
F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Badghis
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected
Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers
seeds 2 2 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 3000 Nb of people affected: 2300
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours
restocking of livestock How to implement: Gov, WFP, UNICEF
How to implement: Gov, WFP, UNICEF How to implement: Gov, WFP, UNICEF
IGA tool kit Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
cash grant 2 ANDAMA NPO/RAA ANDAMA NPO/RAA ANDAMA NPO/RAA
other 1:
other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
irrigation canals 4 50.000 USD 30,000 USD 23,000 USD
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks
construction of protection walls 3 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2
other 1: Shelter 3 5 4 Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 3000 Nb of people affected:
1000
other 2: Seeds 4 6 5 Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours
other 2: How to implement: NGOs How to implement: Gov, FAO How to implement: Gov, FAO
Mitigation measures for future (Long term)
early warning systems (what?) 5 6 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
planting trees NGOs, ANDMA Gov, NGOs Gov, NGOs
other 1: Food Stock 6 7 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
other 2: 85,000 USD 21,000 USD 21,000 USD
F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Herat
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood
affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers
seeds 2 6 6 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
fodder/ animal feed 3 7 5 Nb of people affected: 7000 Nb of people affected: 1200 Nb of people affected: 2000
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 4 weeks Timeline to respond: 5 weeks Timeline to respond: 9 weeks
restocking of livestock How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC
IGA tool kit Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
cash grant 4 2 2 NGOs - ARCS ANDMA - ARCS ANDMA - ARCS
other 1: Potable water 5 3 3
other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
irrigation canals 280000 USD 80000 USD 200000 USD
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks
construction of protection walls
6 4 4 Name of response: 4 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 3
other 1: FFW 7 8 8 Nb of people affected: 12000 Nb of people affected: 600 Nb of people affected: 150
other 2: Food Storage 8 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 5 Weeks Timeline to respond: 3 Months
other 2: Medical Kit 9 How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: CDC How to implement: CDS
Mitigation measures for future (Long term)
early warning systems (what?) Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
planting trees ARCS - ANDMA - MRRD ARCS ARCS - CDC - WHO - WFP
other 1: Food Stock 9 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
other 2: NFI Kit 10 5 7 1000000 USD 40000 USD 100000 USD
F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Farah
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood
affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood
affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers
seeds Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
fodder/ animal feed 3 Nb of people affected: 6000 Nb of people affected: 18000 Nb of people affected: 3000
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 20 Days Timeline to respond: 1 week
restocking of livestock 7 How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC
IGA tool kit 4 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
cash grant 10 ARCS WFP - ANDMA - FAO - UNHCR ARCS WFP - FAO - ANDMA - UNHCR WFP - ARCS - FAO
other 1: NFI Kit 2 3
other 2: Medication 5 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
irrigation canals 9 60000 USD 40000 USD
agricultural land 12 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks 13
construction of protection walls
4 Name of response: 8 Name of response: 5 Name of response: 2
other 1: Shelter 8 2 Nb of people affected: 1800 Nb of people affected: 12000 Nb of people affected: 3000
other 2: Seeds 11 5 2 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 15 Days Timeline to respond: 1 weel
other 2: Potable water 6 How to implement: ARCS How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC
Mitigation measures for future (Long term)
early warning systems (what?) 14 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
planting trees 15 6 UNHCR - ARCS - IFRC - ICRC FAO - CHA - ADA - ARCS FAO - CHA - ADA - ARCS
other 1: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
other 2: 6000 USD 200000 USD 50000 USD
F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Ghor
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood
affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers 2 2
seeds 7 3 3 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 10 Name of response: 16
fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 15800 Nb of people affected: 15000 Nb of people affected:
9600
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 2 months Timeline to respond: 4 months Timeline to respond: 4 months
restocking of livestock How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov
IGA tool kit 14 14 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
cash grant 2 4 4 MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC
other 1: NFI Kit 3 5 5
other 2: Storage 8 8 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
irrigation canals 2449000 USD 450000 USD 264500 USD
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks 6 6
construction of protection walls
4 10 10 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 13 Name of response: 15
other 1: Protetion of grazing areas
5 11 11 Nb of people affected: 18960 Nb of people affected: 18000 Nb of people affected:
12600
other 2: Foos storage 7 7 Timeline to respond: 10 Days Timeline to respond: 5 months Timeline to respond: 4 months
other 2: CFW 6 13 13 How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov
Mitigation measures for future
(Long term)
early warning systems (what?)
12 12 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Construct river bed 16 MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC
other 1: Road Construction
7 15 15 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
other 2: Shelter 9 9 632000 USD 420000 USD 220000 USD
6.1. Northern Region
North Region- Faryab Province
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Flood prone areas
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Gurziwan, Belcheragh, Khwaja Sabz Posh, Shirin Tagab and
Pashtun Kot.
Kohistan, Qaysar, Almar & Maiman
a city.
Khani Chahar Bagh,
Qurghan, Qaramqol, Andkhoy
Distribution
food x x Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
food vouchers Name: Seed distribution
seeds x Name: Food Name: Food Nb of people affected: 5000
fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 30,000 Nb of people affected: 2000 Timeline to respond: 15 days after flood
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 15 days Timeline to respond: 2 weeks after flood How to respond: Through partners of FSAC and ANDMA.
restocking of livestock
How to respond: The project should be implemented with close coordination of NGOs, Gov, CDCs.
How to respond: free distribution: The project should be implemented with close coordination with Gov, CDC and NGOs,
Agencies with experience:
IGA tool kit Agencies with experience: ANDMA, WFP, UNHCR, Save the children, SWHNO
Agencies with experience: DAIL, Public work, Red Cross society and NGOs.
cash grant x
other 1: Shelter x
other 2: Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community:
Rehabilitation
irrigation canals x
agricultural land x Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks Name: Shelter distribution Name: Agriculture tools distribution Name: Canal rehabilitation ( 25 Km)
construction of protection walls
x Nb of people affected: 5000 shelter Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected:
other 1: Timeline to respond: 6 months after flood Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 3 months
other 2: How to respond: with close coordination with based NGOs,Gov department.
How to respond: Through agriculture NGOs, CDC ( provincial level and district level) and water management department.
How to respond: Through RRD, water management department, based NGOs, FSAC partners.
Mitigation measures for future
early warning systems (what?)
x Agencies with experience: UNHCR, ANDMA, OCHA and based NGOs.
Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience:
planting trees x
other 1: Construction of protection walls along the river
x Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates /community:
other 2: PARR and PRR training
x x Budget estimates / community:
Other 3: Construction of water bank
x
North Region Jawzjan Province
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Flood prone areas
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Shibirghan, Darzab, Qush Tepa, Faizabad, Aqcha, Mardyan, Kham Ab, Qarqin, Khamyab
Khwaja Du Koh
Khaniqa
Distribution
food x x Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers x
seeds x Name: Food Name: Food Name: Food voucher
fodder/ animal feed
Nb of people affected: 18000 Nb of people affected: 8000 Nb of people affected: 4800
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 15 days Timeline to respond: 10 days Timeline to respond: 8 months
restocking of livestock
How to respond: Free distribution How to respond: free distribution How to respond: Through voucher and ration card
IGA tool kit x x Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: PMDC
cash grant
other 1: Shelter x s
other 2: Budget estimates / community: 15,000,000 Afs Budget estimates/community: 6,000,000 Afs Budget estimates/Community: 6400,000 Afs
Rehabilitation
irrigation canals x x
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks
x Name: Irrigation canal Name: Construction of protection wall (1000 cu.m) Name: I.G.A
construction of protection walls
x Nb of people affected: 6000 Nb of people affected: 14,880 Nb of people affected: 4800
other 1: Cash for work
x Timeline to respond: 28 days Timeline to respond: 3 months Timeline to respond: 6 months
other 2: How to respond: Cash for work How to respond: Cash for work How to respond: Through training
Mitigation measures for
future
early warning systems (what?)
x x x Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: Experienced INGOs Agencies with experience: A lot of NGOs
planting trees
other 1: Budget estimates / community: 4334400 Afs Budget estimates /community: 6,000,000 Afs Budget estimates / community: 14,000,000 Afs
other 2:
North Region Balkh Province
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Flood prone areas
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Shortepa and Kaldar
Chimtal, Kishindih, Sholgara, Zari
Nahri Shahi, Khulm
Distribution
food 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
food vouchers Name of districts: Shortepa & Kaldar Districts: Chimtal, Keshendi, Zari and Charbolak
seeds 2 2 Name: Food for work (FFW) Name: Food distribution Name:
fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 500 Nb of people affected: 28,000 Nb of people affected:
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 72 hours Timeline to respond: 10 days Timeline to respond:
restocking of livestock How to respond: In initial step direct How to respond: Direct food distribution How to respond:
IGA tool kit 2 Agencies with experience: Action Aid, WFP, ARCS, Johanniter and Save the Children, IOM, NRC
Agencies with experience: PIN, ARCS, ACTED, SVC, ICRC, WFP, AREA, Johanniter
Agencies with experience:
cash grant
other 1: potable water 1 1
other 2: Livestock 3 Budget estimates / community: 116,600 $ Budget estimates / community: 1,515,000 $ Budget estimates / community:
Rehabilitation
irrigation canals 3 3 4
agricultural land Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks Name of districts: Shortepa & Kaldar Districts: Chimtal, Keshendi, Zari and Charbolak Name:
construction of protection walls
4 Name: Food for work (FFW) Name: Cash for work Nb of people affected:
other 1: Nursery 4 Nb of people affected: 7000 Nb of people affected: 10,000 Timeline to respond:
other 2: Timeline to respond: 2 months Timeline to respond: 1 month How to respond:
Mitigation measures for future
early warning systems 5 5 How to respond: Through CDC, community elders and other stakeholders
How to respond: Through CDC, community elders and stakeholders
Agencies with experience:
planting trees 5 Agencies with experience: Action Aid, WFP, ARCS, Johanniter and Save the Children
Agencies with experience: PIN, ARCS, ACTED, SVC
other 1: Budget estimates / community:
other 2:
Budget estimates / community: 213,200 $ Budget estimates / community: 1,515,000 $
Types of Activities: canal cleaning, sub canal digging.
North Region- Saripul Province
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Flood prone areas
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Sozma Qala district
Balkhab district
Sayyad & Kohistan districts and half part of province center
Distribution
food 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
food vouchers Name: Construction of storage
seeds Name: Food distribution Name: Food for Work (FFW) Nb of people affected: 87000
fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 16,750 Nb of people affected: 15,950 Timeline to respond: 6 months
agricultural tools 5 Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 6 months How to respond: Through experienced NGOs
restocking of livestock How to respond: Provincial response team How to respond: free distribution: Through CDC and experienced NGOs,
Agencies with experience:
IGA tool kit Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience:
cash grant Budget estimates /community:
other 1: Cash distribution
1
other 2: Construction storage for agri products
2 Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community:
Rehabilitation
irrigation canals 2 3
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks Name: Construction of protection wall Name: Protection wall construction Name: Cash distribution
construction of protection walls
3 2 4 Nb of people affected: 16,750 Nb of people affected: 15,950 Nb of people affected: 87000
other 1: FFW 4 Timeline to respond: 6 months Timeline to respond: 6 months Timeline to respond: 6 months
other 2: IGA Training 5 How to respond: Through experienced NGOs How to respond: Through experienced NGOs How to respond: Through experienced NGOs
Mitigation measures for
future
early warning systems (what?)
4 3 5 Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience:
planting trees Budget estimates / community:
other 1: Budget estimates /community: Budget estimates /community:
other 2:
Other 3:
North Region- Samangan Province
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Flood prone areas
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Royi Du Ab
Dara-i-Suf Khuram Wa Sarbagh
Distribution
food 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
food vouchers Name: Food distribution
seeds 3 2 2 Name: Food distribution Name: Food distribution Nb of people affected: 12,000
fodder/ animal feed 2 3 Nb of people affected: 15,000 ( 60% to 70% of total population)
Nb of people affected: 12000 Timeline to respond: 1 week
agricultural tools Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 1 week How to respond: Through PDMC, DDMC and partners ( AAD, GTZ, MAIL, DAIL, WFP
restocking of livestock
How to respond: Through district disaster comittee or provincial committee. Pre-position the food stock the food in Royi Du Ab district in advance
How to respond: free distribution: Through PDMC, DDMC and through partners ACF, GTZ, Helvatas, Afghanaid, ARCS, IOM WFP.
Agencies with experience: AAD, ARCS, BRAC, IOM, FAO, WFP and MAIL
IGA tool kit Agencies with experience: Soliarities international, Helvetas, ARCS, District ANDMA, UNOPS, IOM and WFP.
Agencies with experience: ACF, WFP, Helvatas, District ANDMA, DAIL.
cash grant Budget estimates / community: $ 37,500 Budget estimates / community: $ 30,000 Budget estimates /community: $ 30,000 for 12000 beneficiries for transportation
other 1: Cash distribution
3
other 2:
Rehabilitation
irrigation canals 4
agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
reinforcement banks Name: fodder Name: Seed distribution Name: Seed distribution
construction of protection walls
4 4 5 Nb of animal affected: 10,000 Nb of families affected: 800 Nb of people affected: 3000
other 1: Natural resource management
5 5 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 1 or 2 months Timeline to respond: 1 month
other 2: How to respond: Through PDMC and DDMC, through partners, DAIL, AAD, FAO, Helvitas
How to respond: PDMC, DDMC, and partners ( ACF, Helvitas, GTZ)
How to respond: Through PDMC, DDMC and partners ( AAD, FAO
Mitigation measures for
future
early warning systems (what?)
6 6 6 Agencies with experience: DAIl, AAD, FAO, Helvitas
Agencies with experience: DAIL, FAO, Helvitas, GTZ
Agencies with experience: AAD, DAIL, FAO
planting trees Budget estimates / community: $ 200,000 for 10000 bags concentrate ( $ 30,000 required for transportation and distribution)
other 1: Budget estimates /community: $ 25,000 required for procurement and $ 5000 required for transportation.
Budget estimates /community: $ 10,000 needed for procurement of seed and its transportation
other 2:
Other 3:
6.1. Eastern Region
F2: Date: 9 May
2012 Zone Name of the province : Nuristan
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1 Zone
2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected
Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected
Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
Food Distribution 1 3 3 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
NFI kit 2 4 4
Shelter 3 5 5 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
Cash Transfer 4 6 6 Nb of people affected: 24500 Nb of people affected: 25000 Nb of people affected:
25000
Potable water Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Months Timeline to respond: 2 Months
Doctors mobile team How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov,
CDC How to implement:
NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN,
Gov, CDC
Rescue committee Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Fodder/Animal feed ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs NGOs - FAO - DAIL
other 1:
other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
Seeds distribution 5 7 1 100000 USD 50000 USD 100000 USD
CFW 6 1 7 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
FFW 7 8 8
Livestock 8 9 9 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2
Forestry Rehabiliation 9 10 Nb of people affected: 24500 Nb of people affected: 28000 Nb of people affected:
25000
Tree planation 14 15 Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Years Timeline to respond: 6 Months
Gardening 15 2 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN,
Gov, CDC How to implement:
NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN,
Gov, CDC
Mitigation measures for
future (Long term)
early warning systems (what?)
10 11 10 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Food Storage building 11 12 11 ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs - DAIL - IFHOPE
MRRD - NGOs - MoPW
Protection Wall 12 13 12 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
Roads construction 13 14 2 600000 USD 80000 USD 200000 USD
F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Kunar
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1 Zone
2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected
Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected
Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
Food distribution 2 3 3 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
Shelter 3 2 4
NFI kit 11 4 5 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
Potable water 16 5 Nb of people affected: 3729 Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 6500
Doctors mobile team 5 6 Timeline to respond: 24 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Months Timeline to respond: 3 Months
Rescue committee 1 7 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov,
CDC How to implement:
NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN,
Gov, CDC
Fodder/Animal feed 9 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Cash transfer 6 MoPW ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - WFP - IOM - DAIL MoPW ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - WFP
ANDMA MRRD - MoPW - Municipality
Forestry Rehabilitation 2
other 1: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium term)
Seeds distribution 7 8 6 100000 USD 65000 USD 50000 USD
CFW 8 12 7 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
FFW 12 11 8
Cash grant 13 10 9 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2
Fertilizer 14 9 10 Nb of people affected:
3729 Nb of people affected: 3729 Nb of people affected: 7000
Business 10 Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 3 Months Timeline to respond: One Year
Opening of closed roads 1 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN,
Gov, CDC How to implement:
NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC
Mitigation measures for future (Long
term)
early warning systems (what?)
18 15 12 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Food Storage building 4 14 CDCs ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - WFP - IOM - DAIL
ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - DRR - DAIL ANDMA MRRD - MoPW - Municipality
Check dams 17 16 11 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
Protection Wall 15 13 1 55000 USD 372900 USD 110000 USD
F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Laghman
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
Food distribution 2 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
Rescue committee 1 10
Cash transfer 15 11 3 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
NFI kit 16 12 Nb of people affected: 45580 Nb of people affected: 12460 Nb of people affected: 4340
Shelter 3 4 2 Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours
Medical Kit 4 2 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov,
CDC Fodder/Animal feed 9 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Potable water 17 PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP -
FAO PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO
other 1:
other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Rehabilitation (Medium
term)
Seeds distribution 7 5 6 150000 USD 190000 USD 310000 USD
CFW 11 13 10 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
FFW 12 14 11
Cash grant 13 15 8 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 5 Name of response: 2
Infrastructure 8 6 4 Nb of people affected: 45580 Nb of people affected: 12460 Nb of people affected: 4340
other 2: Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours
other 2: How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov,
CDC
Mitigation measures for future (Long
term)
early warning systems (what?)
5 7 7 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Food Storage building 14 8 12 PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO
PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO
Check dams 6 3 5 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
Protection Wall 10 9 9 120000 USD 250000 USD 124000 USD
F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Nangarhar
Priority response options (rank the three first one)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected
Emergency (short term)
Food distribution 1 3 10 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario
First Medical kit 7 4
Potable water 2 14 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1
fodder/ animal feed 6 Nb of people affected:
66000 Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected:
400000
NFI Kit 5 5 8 Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 3 Days Timeline to respond:
3 Months
Rescue Committee 3 1 11 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
cast transfer 4 6 7 Agencies with experience
Agencies with experience
Agencies with experience
other 2: WFP - FAO - Gov WFP - FAO - Gov NGOs - INGOs - Gov
Rehabilitation (Medium
term)
IGA tool kit 13 16 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community
Seeds distribution 9 7 113000 USD 500000 USD 18000
Irrigation system 11 15 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario
CFW 10 8 4
FFW 8 9 5 Name of response: 8 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2
Cash grant 14 Nb of people affected:
11000 Nb of people affected: 8333 Nb of people affected:
66000
Shelter 12 2 9 Timeline to respond: 3 Months Timeline to respond: 1 Week Timeline to respond:
3 Months
other 2: How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov
Mitigation measures for future (Long
term)
early warning systems (what?)
15 11 1 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience
Forestry Rehabilitation
16 10 3 WFP - Gov - IOM - IRC NRC - IOM - UNCHR - CHF NGOs - INGOs - Gov - UN
Check dams 17 13 2 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community
Protection Wall 18 11 6 7200000 USD 1000000 USD 4000000 USD