24
Formative Assessment Toolkit Everything you need to connect formative assessment to teacher practice.

Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

FormativeAssessment

Toolkit

Everything you need to

connect formative assessment to

teacher practice.

Page 2: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

DREAMBOX LEARNING ® SPECIAL REPORT

LEARNING

WHITE PAPER | DREAMBOX LEARNING®

From Formative Assessment to Informative Assessing in the Math ClassroomPREVENTING THE FAILURE TO LEARN

Gregory Firn, EdDSuperintendent in Residence | DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Page 3: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

2

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Introduction: The use of leadingindicators to inform math instruction

One of the routes to deeper student math learning and

a healthy learning mindset is using an “in the moment”

formative assessment process rather than “rear-view mirror”

summative assessment testing data to inform teaching and

learning. Increasingly, experts, researchers, and even new

legislation support the use of ongoing, rigorous formative

assessment to engage students and provide insights into

student thinking so teachers know how to adjust lessons

based on learner thinking and performance, and how to

teach to mathematics standards.

One e�ective advance is the use of software that enables

embedded ongoing formative assessment and seamless

instructional shifts while students are immersed in a game-

like environment—used for “stealth assessing”—a boon for

educators and students alike. Next generation mathematics

software that intelligently adapts, enables the ability to use

data to co-create, co-author, and collaborate instruction,

while promoting student agency. Now there is no need to

wait until a student has failed to intervene and correct the

mistake or failure.

Whether teachers are taking advantage of more traditional

formative assessment strategies or using education

technology to enable ongoing embedded informative

assessing, a change in culture and teaching methods is

required. The cultural shift necessary for strategically using

informative assessing in math doesn’t happen overnight.

But the stimulation of metacognitive thinking, student

engagement, and instructor insights are worth the results:

deeper student understanding and authentic growth in

mathematics knowledge and achievement.

IN THIS PAPER

Introduction: The Use of Leading Indicatorsto Inform Math Instruction 2

Informative AssessingDefined 3

• Research and Evidence

Creating a Supportive Culture 6

• Realistic Strategies at the Administrative and Classroom Level

• Data and Next Generation Technology in the Infomative Math Classroom

Conclusion: InformativeAssessing is TransformingMath Learning 11

References 12

Resources 13

Page 4: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

3

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc. © 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Informative assessing defined The English word “assessment” is derived from the Latin assidere “to sit beside.” One way to

think about transforming formative assessment to informative assessing is to think of it as

akin to living a wellness lifestyle: preventing health problems before they occur. In the same

way, in its most authentic state, assessment should serve to prevent intervention, not merely

react to instruction, and occurs during the learning process, so that it is unnecessary to wait

until a student has failed to treat a mistake or failure to learn. It informs and also provides

insight and intelligence to both teacher and learner. Research shows that the collaborative

nature of this collaborative approach results in a less stressful environment for teachers and

students alike,1 and in the activation of students as owners of their learning by stimulating

metacognition, motivation, interest, attribution, and self-assessment.2 I am advocating

a shift to thinking of the process as one of informative assessing—meaning an ongoing

process that informs both teaching and learning.

Form

Time factor

Frequency

Grading

Student engagement

Use requirements

Purpose

INFORMATIVE ASSESSING

Ongoing process

In the moment: Integrated while learning is taking place; not a one-time event

Ongoing

Not necessarily graded; information is used as feedback for student and teacher

Active engagement and self-regulation

Defined targets understood by studentDefined criteria understood by studentDescriptive vs. evaluative feedback

Constructive feedback and understanding to inform and adjust instruction

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Test

Rear-view mirror: What was learned and at a distance from the learning objective at a particular point in time; a one-time event

At a particular point in time

Graded

Passive

Assessment plan that clearly defines learning targets. Well-designed test using evidence-based best practices

Evaluate progress at specific points in time against curriculum and/or standards, program e�ectiveness, student improvement goals, and student placement

Page 5: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

4

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

One of the challenges with reimagining formative assessment is moving away from how

it has been used to predict performance on summative assessments. This is part of the

dissonance that teachers face in embracing the shift.

RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE

Informing instruction through ongoing assessment isn’t new—it’s been with us since the time

of Socrates3—and many teachers have used it in the classroom to elicit feedback and dialogue

with students. Educators and researchers re�ned the concept over time, but in 1998 when the

in�uential review, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment, by

Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam was published, formative assessment began to gain mindshare

in school systems worldwide. Black and Wiliam found that formative assessment promises

high-quality education for all, and can raise standards and improve learning outcomes for all

students, including those students who are “low attainers” or who have learning disabilities,

due in large part to the use of feedback to enhance learning.4 The Assessment Reform Group,

which commissioned Black and Wiliam’s research review, has unequivocally concluded that

improved formative assessment practices in classrooms typically yield gains in student

achievement roughly equivalent to one to two grade levels in learning.5

Source: http://cdn.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-Beyond-the-Black-Box.pdf

Improved formative assessment practices in

classrooms typically yield gains instudent achievement roughly

equivalent to one to two gradelevels in learning.

The most powerful single modification that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest prescription for improving education must be ‘dollops of feedback.’ —John Hattie, Author of Visible Learning“ ”

Page 6: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

5

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc. © 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

The power of formative assessment is echoed in the meta-analysis of e�ective instructional

strategies led by Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock,6 which identi�ed

providing feedback—a central principle of formative assessment as one of nine categories

of instructional strategies that have statistically signi�cant e�ects on student achievement.

More recently, John Hattie, who authored the book Visible Learning—a meta-analysis of

more than 800 research studies involving more than 80 million students7—has said, “The

most powerful single modi�cation that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest

prescription for improving education must be ‘dollops of feedback.‘”8

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) has long supported the use

of formative assessment in classroom practice, and con�rms the view that it directly

correlates with improvement and student achievement. “Formative strategies embedded

in instruction provide opportunities for students to make conjectures, incorporate multiple

representations in their problem solving, and discuss their mathematical thinking with

their peers. E�ective formative assessment has a positive impact on student achievement

and how they perceive themselves as learners. This stance is backed up by research and the

understanding of how students actually learn.”9

SUPPORT FOR CHALLENGED AND ADVANCED

LEARNERS. No single method, reform, or system is the

“silver bullet” that can solve all educational challenges, but

improved formative assessing strategies does pro�er a potent

means for meeting goals for high-performance, high-equity

student outcomes, and a pathway to provide students with

21st century knowledge and skills for lifelong learning.

Formative assessment researcher Margaret Heritage10 also

notes that its support of key initiatives such as Multi-Tiered

System of Supports (MTSS), Response to Intervention

(RtI), Common Core State Standards (CCSS), and Next

Generation Science Standards (NGSS) help make the case for

enculturation of formative assessment. Because formative

assessment by its nature teaches to the individual and not the

test, it has great potential as a tool to help every learner.

For additional research studies that provide evidence that

informative assessing positively impacts teacher practice

and student achievement, refer to the Resources section at

the end of this document.

A look into Robert Marzano’s meta-analysis and research

Robert Marzano explains the e�ective practice

of ongoing formative assessing in the

classroom to power student gains.

PLAY

Because formative

assessment by its

nature teaches to the

individual and not the

test, it has a great

potential as a tool to

help every learner.

Page 7: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

6

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Creating a supportive culture The role of administrators. A school-wide or district-wide commitment to informative

assessing is most effective and sustainable when it is done well under the right conditions—

meaning, a supportive culture. Developing a culture of informative assessing relies on

a coordinated, collaborative, and comprehensive process that stresses professional

development for administrators and teachers, and also provides the time for new learning

and new tools. School leaders must create time for teachers to improve formative assessing

practices and must ensure that teachers receive consistent and constructive feedback on

their use of those practices in the classroom. Administration, instructional coaches, and

mentor teachers can demonstrate their beliefs in using informative assessing and act in

partnership toward a common and sustained goal to incorporate formative assessment.

Source: http://www.essentialconditions.ca/essentialconditions_eng.pdf

A Guide to Support Implementation:

Essential Conditions11

Collaborative implementation planning by educational leaders at all levels across the

school district requires:

Shared vision. Stakeholders share an understanding of and commitment to the implementation of

formative assessment across the district.

Leadership. Leaders at all levels provide the leadership that moves the organization toward its goal.

Research and evidence. Implementation decisions must be based on current research as well as

recent district and school data.

Resources. Successful implementation depends upon having su�cient human resources,

materials, and funding.

Teacher professional growth. Ongoing PD is provided to enhance teachers’ understanding of

formative assessment processes.

Time. Successful implementation and sustained change take time.

Community engagement. Parents, school councils, students, and other community members

must be included in developing the vision and plans for its implementation.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 8: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

7

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc. © 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Informative assessing, in math or any other subject, is ongoing, and takes patience, training, and support to be well executed and meaningful for both teacher and student.

REALISTIC STRATEGIES AT THE ADMINISTRATIVEAND CLASSROOM LEVEL

A two-way street for math students and teachers. As Cathy Fosnot emphasized in

her webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment

should inform lessons and learning dynamically and formatively, not statically. It

should be continuous, support a growth mindset in learners, and provide information

about a student’s Zone of Proximal Development, as de�ned by Vygotsky.13 It captures

genuine mathematizing—learner strategies, their ways of modeling problems, and their

understanding of key mathematical ideas. Bottom line, assessment needs to be continuous,

dynamic, and adaptive so that it can capture where the child is on the landscape of

learning—where they have been, what their struggles are, and where they are going next.”

In other words, informative assessing provides information that changes what both the

teacher and the learner are doing. Students also learn the skills of self-assessment and

peer-assessment. These tools enable them to collaborate with their teachers in developing

a shared understanding of their current learning status, and what they need to do to move

forward in their learning.

Source: http://www.cse.ucla.edu/downloads/files/ARCC.Webinar.pdf

Feedback is Essential to E�ective Formative Assessing

FeedbackLoop

Close the Gap

Eliciting Evidenceof Learning

Interpreting theEvidence

Indentifyingthe Gap

FeedbackTeacher-Assessment

Peer-Assessment

Self-Assessment

Classroom Culture

Sca�olding in theZone of Proximal

Development

Adapting/Respondingto Learning Needs

Learning Progression

Learning Goal

Criteria for Success

Page 9: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

8

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

In doing so, they are using metacognitive processes. They re�ect on their learning,

monitoring what they know and understand, and are determining when they need more

information. They also develop self-regulation strategies and are able to adapt their learning

tactics to meet their own learning needs. Students must also collaborate with their teachers

to determine the criteria for success for each step along the learning progression.14

In line with the “growth mindset” research from Carol Dweck,15 formative assessing helps

set students up for success and assists in the development of new ways of thinking and

improving. In mathematics, students who have come to think of themselves as “bad at math”

get a clearer idea of what they need to do to develop their understanding and make forward

progress: simply focus on making sense of the ideas, looking for relationships and patterns,

and develop knowledge and skills. The goal of formative assessing is to inform and improve.

As accomplishments are made and one achievement builds upon another, motivation

springs up, and that breeds success.

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the role of assessments. ESSA, which will

take e�ect after the 2017–2018 school year, represents an unprecedented opportunity

for a serious review of the role, purpose, and utility of

assessments. Moreover, ESSA will challenge schools and

school systems to assess the value of assessments to

inform, improve, and impact teaching and learning.16 ESSA

recognizes the need for greater balance between formative

and summative assessments. The Act itself also encourages

the adoption of innovative approaches to formative

assessing to help bring even greater equity and improve the

quality of teaching and learning.

Formative assessing in action

Learn how math teacher Ben Mook challenges

his students to solve real-life problems, and

why he emphasizes their thought processes

over getting the right answers.

PLAY

In other words,

informative assessing

provides information

that changes what

both the teacher and

the learner are doing.

Page 10: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

9

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc. © 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Free, evidence-based resources for administrators and teachers

Both resources provide lessons, tasks, professional development

modules, and tools aligned to the current standards.

Standardized math tests can become less formidable. In 2008, the National Mathematics

Advisory Panel cited research to support the position that the use of formative assessment

in mathematics classrooms directly correlates with improvement in student achievement

(as measured by tests). “A review of practice by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation

and Development (OECD) across eight countries de�ned formative assessment as frequent,

interactive assessments of students’ progress and understanding to identify learning needs

and adjust teaching appropriately.”17 Formative strategies embedded in instruction provide

opportunities for students to make conjectures, incorporate multiple representations in their

problem solving, and discuss their mathematical thinking with their peers, with a positive

impact on student achievement and how they perceive themselves as learners.

Formative assessment guides the curriculum through a re�ective process focused on

student attainment of goals and standards. Because the feedback is so rich and meaningful,

students can do well on standardized and other summative tests because they have deeply

learned and understand mathematical concepts.18

LEARN MORE

Mathematics AssessmentResource Service

LEARN MORE

Mathematics Formative Assessment

System/CPALMS

Page 11: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

10

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

DATA AND NEXT GENERATION TECHNOLOGY IN THE INFORMATIVE MATH CLASSROOMThe analysis and ability to act on data is a necessary shift to assess the learning process, and

not just the product of learning. With the advent of educational technology that provides

in-the-moment data, the collection and understanding of those data has been simpli�ed,

thus freeing the teacher to make more e�ective use of class time. Data that provide insights

into how a learner is constructing meaning, forming understanding, and practicing skills

in the very moment of learning—in real

time—is helping drive a revolution in

seamless, continual, embedded formative

assessment. The use of data, especially as

it relates to the consistent and constant

improvement of teaching and learning, is

central to creating and sustaining a culture

with transformative impact.19

From formative assessment to

informative assessment and instruction.

A few next-generation educational math

software programs provide truly ongoing

embedded formative assessing and are

able to analyze data delivered in real time

to surface how students are thinking and

the strategies they are using to solve a

problem. This ability means it is possible to

interrupt, disrupt, and �nally to prevent the

failure to learn.

Informative assessing to meet mathematics standards

Massachusetts’ Carlton Innovation School used DreamBox

Learning adaptive digital curriculum with embedded ongoing

formative assessing within and between lessons to create the

optimal learning experience for every student. each student

monitors whether an objective has been mastered and

provides support with varying strategies until the assigned

standard is achieved.

READ THE CASE STUDY

17%9%

FEWER STUDENTSIN WARNINGCATEGORY

12%MORE STUDENTS

MEETING ADVANCED

PROFICIENCY

2013–2014

Growth achievedwith 60 minutesof DreamBoxLearning Mathusage per week

Gains on Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)

Source: DreamBox Learning

Page 12: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

11

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc. © 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

By tracking, analyzing, and responding every time a student takes an action, Intelligent

Adaptive Learning software from DreamBox Learning works at the point of learning. In

addition to formative assessing, this learning software incorporates “formative instruction”

because every lesson utilizes virtual manipulatives that allow students to show their

thinking—through rich, interactive, and open-ended problem solving lessons—and allow

the capture of every decision a student makes, as well as data regarding response time,

strategy used, types of mistakes made, and more. The idea behind continuous assessment

isn’t just to enable providing a slightly more di�cult or easier problem in response to a single

answer. It’s also to understand the strategy being used by the student when an answer was

submitted. The data are continuously available to the teacher so he or she can engage, or

the information can be used to group students appropriately so they can be supported in

meeting learning objectives.

Conclusion: Informative assessing istransforming math learning Using informative assessing in mathematics instruction or any other subject isn’t about

teaching to the test or teaching to the middle. It’s about teaching for and to the individual

in alignment with key learning outcomes. It is an essential tool for individualization and

di�erentiation, and when enabled by the latest educational technology, it supports deep

learning and personalization at scale, for every math learner no matter where they are in

their learning journey.

Change is never easy, particularly for reform-weary educators, parents, and students. But

research and experience show that this approach of “sitting beside” students and guiding

them to mathematics understanding is worth implementing. Now is the time to be

reinvigorated and inspired to use practices that make math learning more engaging, more

down-to-earth, and frankly, more enjoyable for teachers and students.

Let’s begin now to develop a “prevention to intervention mindset” for all math learners. We

stand at the frontier of achieving universal numeracy. The shift to preventing the failure to

learn from remediating failed learning is now possible through empowering teachers and

learners alike with the new technology.

We stand at the

frontier of achieving

universal numeracy.

The shift to preventing

the failure to learn

from remediating

failed learning is now

possible through

empowering teachers

and learners alike

with the new of

technology.

Page 13: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

12

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

REFERENCES

1. Madison-Harris, R., & Muoneke, A. (2012). Using Formative Assessment to Improve Student Achievement in the Core Content Areas. Accessed from http://secc.sedl.org/resources/briefs/formative_assessment_core_content/

2. Wiliam, D. (2010). Taking Assessment for Learning to Scale. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756772.pdf

3. Gareis, C. R. (2006). Collaborative Leadership The Forgotten Art of Formative Assessment. Accessed from https://education.wm.edu/centers/ttac/resources/articles/assessment/forgottenart/index.php

4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2001). Inside the Black Box Raising: Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Accessed from https://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf

5. The Assessment Reform Group. (2010). Assessment for Learning. Accessed from http://cdn.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-Beyond-the-Black-Box.pdf

6. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2012). Classroom Instruction That Works, Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement (2nd Edition) Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

7. Hattie, J. (2014). Visible Learning Infographic. Accessed from http://visible-learning.org/2013/03/visible-learning-infographic/

8. Hattie, J. (1992). Self Concept. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

9. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Formative Assessment. Accessed from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Formative-Assessment/

10. Heritage, M. (Undated). Online Formative Assessment Program. The Center on Standards & Assessment Implementation. Accessed from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/downloads/files/ARCC.Webinar.pdf

11. Alberta Assessment Consortium. (2012). A Guide to Support Implementation: Essential Conditions. Accessed from http://www.essentialconditions.ca/essentialconditions_eng.pdf

12. Fosnot, C. (2016). Webinar: Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: a Growth Mindset Perspective. https://vts.inxpo.com/scripts/Server.nxp?LASCmd=AI:4;F:QS!10100&ShowKey=29618&partnerref=TOC&Referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edweek.org%2Few%2Fmarketplace%2Fwebinars%2Fwebinars.html

13. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Mind and Society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Accessed from http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~siegler/vygotsky78.pdf

14. Heritage, M. (2007). Formative Assessment: What Do Teachers Need to Know and Do? Accessed from http://www.pdkmembers.org/members_online/publications/Archive/pdf/k0710her.pdf

15. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantine Books.

16. United States Department of Education (2016). Letter to Chief State School Officers, February 2, 2016. Accessed from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/saa/16-0002signedcsso222016ltr.pdf

17. Centre for Education Research and Innovation (CERI) (2008). OECD/CERI International Conference “Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy”, Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment, 15-16 May 2008. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf

18. Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work. Accessed from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/106006/chapters/The-Case-for-Classroom-Assessment.aspx

19. Firn, G. (2015). A New Math Classroom: Creating a Data-Driven Culture. Accessed from http://www.dreambox.com/white-papers/data-driven-culture

Page 14: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

© 2016 DreamBox Learning, Inc.

Learn how districts use DreamBox Learning Math and its ongoing embedded informative assessing to close achievement gaps.For a demo, call 877.451.7845.

RESOURCES

ORGANIZATIONS

Assessment Reform Group (ARG)—Association for Achievement & Improvement Through Assessment: http://www.aaia.org.uk/a�/assessment-reform-group/

Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers (FAST), State Collaboratives on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS), Chief Council of State School O�cers (CCSSO): http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/Formative_Assessment_for_Students_and_Teachers_%28FAST%29.html

Mathematics Assessment Project. Assessing 21st Century Math and Mathematics Assessment Resource Service: http://map.mathshell.org/. MFAS/CPALMS http://www.cpalms.org/resource/mfas.aspx

National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA): http://www.cse.ucla.edu/about/mission.php

National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessments (NCIEA), also known as the Center for Assessment: http://www.nciea.org/about.php

Alliance for Excellent Education: http://all4ed.org/

BOOKS | RESEARCH

Beers, B. (2006). Learning-driven schools: A practical guide for teachers and principals. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp. 7–74.

Collins, A. (Ed.). (2011). Using classroom assessment to improve student learning. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6, pp. 101–116.

Dodge, J. (2012). What are formative assessments and why should we use them? New York, NY: Scholastic.

Foster, D., & Poppers, A. (2009). Using formative assessment to drive learning. The Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative: A Twelve-year research and development project. The Noyce Foundation. http://www.svmimac.org/images/Using_Formative_Assessment_to_Drive_Learning_Reduced.pdf

Hanover Research. The Impact of Formative Assessment and Learning Intentions on Student Achievement. http://www.hanoverresearch.com/media/The-Impact-of-Formative-Assessment-and-Learning-Intentions-on-Student-Achievement.pdf

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

Hattie, J. We aren’t using assessment correctly. EdWeek. October 27, 2015. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/10/28/we-arent-using-assessments-correctly.html

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. New York, NY: Routledge.

Heritage, H. M. (2013). Formative Assessment in Practice: A Process of Inquiry and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Linn, R. L., & Grolund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The �nal report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Popham, W. (2005). Assessment for Educational Leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Instruction that measures up: Successful teaching in an age of accountability. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Schmoker, M. (2006). Results now: How can we achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Veldhuis M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Primary School Teachers’ Assessment Pro�les in Mathematics Education. PLOS ONE 9(1): e86817. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0086817

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

LEARNING

Page 15: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

A Teacher’s Guide to Formative Assessment in MathematicsHow to Accelerate Algebraic Thinking Stefani Kauppila, Curriculum Designer | DreamBox Learning, Inc.

LEARNING

Page 16: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

Formative assessment is a term that describes what good teachers already do! When teachers evaluate, question, and re�ect upon real-time student learning, they can quickly and e�ciently adjust their instruction based on student understanding. These ongoing assessment techniques allow teachers to activate student learning and use performance data to consistently di�erentiate. It is also bene�cial in structuring a more regular cycle of student feedback. This informs targeted instruction, helps create appropriate strategy groups, and assists in communicating more e�ectively with students, parents, and guardians.

ABOUT THIS GUIDETo illustrate the di�erence formative assessment can make in

improving student understanding and achievement, this guide

is focused on algebraic reasoning, which many students �nd

challenging. Using formative assessment strategies in face-to-face

and digital environments are important ways to help students make

the shift to the analytic, qualitative reasoning about values and

variables needed to successfully develop algebra and thinking.

Table of Contents

• Using formative 3 assessments to advance algebraic understanding

• Primary (Grades K–2) 3

• Intermediate (Grades 3–5) 4

• Middle school (Grades 6–8) 5

• Growing algebraic 6 understanding with digital tools

• Learn about 6 next-generation software

• Formative assessment 7 success story

• Free formative assessment 8 resources

A meta-analysis by Black and Wiliam indicates:

A ONE-GRADE LEAP IN EFFECTIVENESS

WHEN FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IS

USED IN THE CLASSROOM

Source: Assessment and Classroom Learning, Black and Wiliam, 1998

2

Page 17: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

USING FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS TOADVANCE ALGEBRAIC UNDERSTANDINGFormative assessment and the data you collect helps you understand student needs and address

them more e�ectively in your classroom every day.

Following are scenarios for primary, intermediate, and middle school grades for you to use

in your classroom.

SCENARIO 1: PRIMARY (GRADES K–2)By second grade, most learners can work beyond the simple computational �uency of

2 + 3 = 5 and consider new relationships among numbers and unknown quantities. Asking

students to compute quantities that relate to a de�ned sum, instead of simply counting up to

�nd the sum, helps them think more conceptually about mathematical generalizations using

algebraic notation.

Shift from 2 + 3 = n to 2 + n = 5

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: Early on, students learn the concepts of numbers, counting,

addition, subtraction, and cardinality to understand basic mathematical relationships, sums, and

di�erences. These �rst algebraic reasoning experiences (2 + __ = 5) may cause confusion because

students may have only developed one view in their minds as to how to solve an equation

(2 + 3 = __). Formative assessment techniques can lead a teacher to analyze a student’s progress

in both the basic computation of numbers and in the new concepts of algebraic reasoning. A

teacher may choose to formatively assess quickly with the entire class by asking a computation-

based question and having the entire class hold up how many �ngers represent the answer.

In each question posed to the students, the placement of the missing quantity, either as a sum

(2 + 3 = __) or as an addend (2 + __ = 5) in the equation, di�erentiates whether a student

struggles with the basic computation involved in addition (unknown sum) or the algebraic

thinking involved in adding to an unknown quantity (unknown addend). Immediately

responding to incorrect patterns of thinking observed when students hold up their �ngers to

answer, allows for a swift intervention and a new teaching opportunity.

DATA COLLECTION: Using these observations, teachers can choose to group students based on

common mistakes, mutual understanding of concepts, and/or mastery. Whether the next steps

are remedial, practice, or extension, the teacher has real-time data to support student learning.

11numberrelationships

3

Page 18: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

SCENARIO 2: INTERMEDIATE (GRADES 3–5)Intermediate-age learners continue to connect algebraic thinking using patterns and

unknown quantities with other mathematical concepts such as decimals, fractions, and

negative numbers.

Shift from 270 + x = 566 to x + — = 0.35

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: When reasoning algebraically, students are often activating their

knowledge of other math concepts as well, such as rational numbers with decimal representations.

With multiple concepts being taught and assessed, it can be di�cult for teachers to determine

which concepts and/or skills are causing students to draw incorrect mathematical conclusions.

In this example, a student may be struggling with either the concept of computing with rational

numbers in general or with the concept of unknown quantities and patterns. It is necessary for

teachers to collect evidence of real-time, informal assessment in both areas to inform which steps

need to be taken next.

In this case, a teacher may choose to pass out whiteboards and pens to students and ask

directed questions that illuminate the concept of decimals and the concept of unknown

quantities separately.

DATA COLLECTION: As the class responds to questions, the teacher can keep a clipboard in hand

to write quick notes on the students’ progress. Making comments on each student every single day

may be unrealistic, so it may be that the teacher records only the anomalies in student responses.

It is important to think about what kind of list or graphic organizer you want to create for the

clipboard in order to maximize e�ciency and get the most out of taking shorthand notes.

Some teachers prefer to simply have a sheet with a list of student names and a corresponding

box in which to write comments. Other teachers prefer to have a seating chart drawn with boxes

that represent their writing space for each student. These notes become a daily record of progress

over time, which informs groupings, small group teaching the next day in class, and conferencing

opportunities with parents and guardians.

22decimals &unknownquantities

WANT TO TAKE

A DEEPER DIVE? Read From Formative Assessment

to Informative Assessing in

the Math Classroom

710

4

Page 19: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

SCENARIO 3: MIDDLE SCHOOL (GRADES 6–8)Middle school students continue their algebraic work with connecting their ideas about

patterns, numbers, and operations with more symbolic representations of equations,

expressions, and functions. This begins their study of more formal algebra.

Shift from 2x + 4 = 10 to y + 2x = 4

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: When learning di�erent linear forms of equations such as y = mx +

b, students work to understand and use an equation to represent the relationship between two

variables and values. New concepts arise for the student to think about: variables can represent

many unknown quantities instead of having just one value, and the value of one variable is related

to the value of the other variables in the equation (when x changes, y changes). Intermingled in this

learning is also the idea of rates of change (slope) and the connection to the visual representation of

the linear function on a graph or in a table.

With so many ideas for students to consider, teachers must consistently assess which concepts

students have made sense of and have demonstrated understanding of, and which concepts

have caused pain points. One way to check for understanding and assess for learning is to ask

each student to create an assessment for a partner; this forces the student to make meaning of

the concepts while designing assessment materials. While working with a partner to complete

an assessment, students engage in self-assessment and re�ection, which may lead to discovering

mistakes in the inherent design, or they may �nd misunderstanding in the application of concepts.

DATA COLLECTION: By allowing students to explore the concept through crafting their own

assessments for partners, they gain immediate and direct peer feedback about the validity of

the problem(s) they created, they are able to teach one another in the moment, and they can

discuss understanding of the concept as a whole. It is important that this is presented as a learning

experience instead of as a competition. At the end of the activity, students independently re�ect

upon their work and communicate to the teacher the roadblocks, questions, and successes they

experienced via a narrative written on the back of the assessment. This narrative feedback can help

inform appropriate learning targets for the next class session.

33equations,expressions &

functions

WANT TO TAKE

A DEEPER DIVE? Read Strategies for Teaching

Middle School Math

5

Page 20: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

GROWING ALGEBRAIC UNDERSTANDINGWITH DIGITAL TOOLS

We shared three formative assessment techniques you can use in your classroom to support

developing algebraic understanding. In addition to these techniques, you can consider using

DreamBox to perform formative assessment and provide data. That way, you can easily access data

without having to do all of the time-consuming data collection. This freedom helps you do what

you love: work with your students.

DreamBox software provides:

1. An engaging, seamless way to collect data to help understand how learners are thinking

about math concepts, what strategies they are using, and when they’ve demonstrated

pro�ciency in algebra standards.

2. Insight Dashboards help you know when you may need to pivot instruction. The same

continuous formative assessment that delivers personalization of path, pace, and sequence for

every learner in DreamBox also captures the instructional insights and learning data needed to

make informed decisions about instruction and instructional programming.

3 A way to facilitate more meaningful conversations and group students for more

e�ective instruction.

4. The means to dive deeper and take action, about how your class is performing

against standards.

5. An engaging environment that uses digital manipulatives, interactive game-like immersion,

and immediate feedback to motivate students to persist without feeling like they’re

being tested.

W E B I N A R

Take a look at how DreamBox supports algebraic thinkingfor every student with ongoing, embedded formative assessment

PLAY

6

Page 21: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

S U CC E S S S TO RY

Continuous formativeassessment and actionabledata power personalizationand achievement

Learn how formative assessment embedded within and between lessons creates the optimal

learning experience for every math student, every time.

Carlton Innovation School, which serves low-income students, students with disabilities, and

English Language Learners, was looking for a way to remediate struggling math learners. They

found DreamBox Learning® Math. Between the 2013 and 2014 Massachusetts Comprehensive

Assessment System (MCAS) testing period, Carlton enjoyed an increase of 17 percent in math

pro�ciency school-wide.

Now, twelve percent more students are considered “advanced” under the same measurements, and

nine percent moved out of the “warning” category. If you’re looking for a way to help your students

achieve math mastery, you’ll see how just an hour a week can spur growth.

The wide range of learners in each classroom makes it di�cult to know

where each student is in their learning. To be proactive in meeting all

of our students’ needs we have access to data, but we also need to

see quickly what that data means.

—Teegan von Burn, Assistance Principal

Carlton Innovation School, Salem, Massachusetts

17%9%

FEWER STUDENTSIN WARNINGCATEGORY

12%MORE STUDENTS

MEETING ADVANCED

PROFICIENCY

2013–2014

Growth achievedwith 60 minutesof DreamBoxLearning Mathusage per week

Gains on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)

READ THE SUCCESS STORY

7

Page 22: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

FREE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT RESOURCES Online math toolboxesCheck out these resources that provide thousands of formative assessments, tasks and rubrics, and

lesson-study resource kits for algebra and geometry:

Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS)

The system includes tasks or problems that teachers can implement with their students, and rubrics

that help the teacher interpret students’ responses. Teachers using MFAS ask students to perform

mathematical tasks, explain their reasoning, and justify their solutions.

Mathematics Assessment Project

The Mathematics Assessment Project is part of the Math Design Collaborative initiated by the

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The project set out to design and develop well-engineered tools

for formative and summative assessment that expose students’ mathematical knowledge and

reasoning, helping teachers guide them towards improvement, while monitoring progress.

Inside Mathematics Performance Assessment Tasks

Provides grade-level formative performance assessment tasks with accompanying scoring rubrics

and discussion of student work samples. They are aligned to the Common Core State Standards for

Mathematics.

DreamBox Learning has many teacher resources related to formative assessment, including blogs and videos. Our Teacher Tools are lessons from K–12 all use ongoing embedded formative assessment. You can also watch helpful webinars, including The Future of Math Learning, featuring Cathy Fosnot.LEARNING

Page 23: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

RESULTS AT A GLANCE

After using DreamBox Learning Math in their math intervention programs for one year, NWEA MAP® scores across the board have improved in DeKalb Central School District. Additionally, district interventionists report that growth is occurring for all of their students. DreamBox, combined with quality Tier 1 instruction and small-group instruction, is credited for increasing students’ comprehension of math.

DeKalb Central School District, Waterloo, Indiana

From intervention to universal growthHow DreamBox Learning® Math is helping to identify and close math learning gaps.

SUCCESS STORY | BLENDED LEARNING

“We use DreamBox to drive our one-

on-one instruction and lesson plans

so we can focus on kids who have

huge gaps in their learning. We are

able to see where each student is in

their learning and where they need

additional support, which makes our

intervention a lot more powerful for

our students.”

—Anna Wiley Math Intervention Teacher DeKalb Central School District

DreamBox + Great teaching = increased NWEA Map® scores

for all students

CHALLENGEClose Learning Gaps with At-Risk Students and Promote Overall District Growth in Math DeKalb Central School District administrators identi�ed that a percentage of their students required math intervention when results on the Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus (ISTEP+) showed less than ideal performance in mathematics. Furthermore, MAP data revealed that even the 75 to 80 percent of students performing at or above grade level demonstrated learning gaps that prevented them from mastering more challenging concepts.

With the goal of pinpointing the root of the problematic gaps, district and school administrators embarked on a path to increase learning outcomes. It wasn’t an easy task and would require a long-term solution that would universally help students across all grade levels.

Page 24: Formative Assessment Toolkit - eSchool Newsher webinar, Dynamic vs. Static Assessment: A Growth Mindset Perspective,12 “Assessment should inform lessons and learning dynamically

SOLUTION

Use formative data to provide targeted interventionAfter careful review, a collective group of district leaders decided to implement a math intervention program, which consists of providing one-on-one support for students performing in their grade’s lowest quartile, in addition to their classroom instruction. DreamBox Learning Math was selected as a core component of the intervention program because of its ability to identify and close learning gaps by providing rigorous curriculum aligned to the readiness of individual students.

Rather than providing prede�ned learning progressions, DreamBox uses formative data to deliver speci�c feedback and sca�olding based on each student’s actions and strategies taken in the moment of learning. This level of adapting promotes developing missed skills, students have become even more successful, resulting in conceptual understanding across grade levels and math topics. By identifying and learning growth for students at all abilities—from those requiring math intervention to those performing at or above grade level.

Excited by her students’ success, Math Intervention Teacher Anna Wiley appreciates that DreamBox supports her in meeting the needs of students. The program surfaces student learning data in a format that makes it easy to identify their learning hurdles and drive both small-group and individual instruction tailored to student needs.

RESULTS

Increased NWEA MAP Scores After using DreamBox Learning Math as part of their math intervention programs for one year, NWEA scores across the board have improved in DeKalb Central School District. Additionally, district interventionists report that growth is occurring for all of their students. This increase in math comprehension is credited to DreamBox usage, quality Tier 1 instruction, and small-group instruction.

“Because of our concerted e�ort to use DreamBox as part of our Intervention Program, we are closing the gaps in learning,” says Julia Tipton, Curriculum and Instruction Specialist. With unanimously positive results in the intervention program, DeKalb Central School District now uses DreamBox Learning across all K–5 classes in the district’s four elementary schools.

DEKALB FAST FACTS

• Grades: K–8

• Enrollment: 3,800

• Free and reduced lunch: 40%

DREAMBOX IMPLEMENTATION

• Small group and one-to-one

instruction

• Math intervention in grades K-5

For more information, contact Client Success at 877.451.7845, or visit DreamBox.com.