29
Systematic Reduction A reducible representation of finite order can be systematically reduced into its component irreducible representations by applying the following equation for each and every species (irreducible representation) of the group: n i ' 1 h j c g c χ i χ r n i number of times the ith irreducible representation contributes to the reducible representation h group order c class g c number of operations in the class c χ i character of the irreducible representation for the class c χ r character for the reducible representation for the class c L The work of carrying out a systematic reduction is better organized by using the tabular method, rather than writing out the individual equations for each irreducible representation.

GroupTheory

  • Upload
    diep

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Summarize on Systematic Reduction

Citation preview

Page 1: GroupTheory

Systematic Reduction

A reducible representation of finite order can be systematically reducedinto its component irreducible representations by applying the followingequation for each and every species (irreducible representation) of thegroup:

ni '1hj

c

gcχi χr

ni number of times the ith irreducible representation contributes to thereducible representation

h group order

c class

gc number of operations in the class c

χi character of the irreducible representation for the class c

χr character for the reducible representation for the class c

L The work of carrying out a systematic reduction is better organizedby using the tabular method, rather than writing out the individualequations for each irreducible representation.

Page 2: GroupTheory

Tabular Method

! To carry out the reduction, construct a work sheet with rows for eachspecies, columns for each product giχiχr, a column for the sum of allgiχiχ products for each species (G), and a final column for ni = Ggiχiχ/h.

Sample reducible representation worksheet:

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0 G G/24

A1

A2

E

T1

T2

Character table for Td (without last column for vector transformations):

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

E 2 -1 2 0 0

T1 3 0 -1 1 -1

T2 3 0 -1 -1 1

Page 3: GroupTheory

Filled-In Work Sheet for Sample Representation

Sample reducible representation worksheet, filled in:

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0 G G/24

A1 8 -8 12 -12 0 0 0

A2 8 -8 12 12 0 24 1

E 16 8 24 0 0 48 2

T1 24 0 -12 -12 0 0 0

T2 24 0 -12 12 0 24 1

Character table for Td (without last column for vector transformations):

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

E 2 -1 2 0 0

T1 3 0 -1 1 -1

T2 3 0 -1 -1 1

Result:Γr = A2 + 2E + T2

L Carrying out the work this way involves simply multiplying orchanging signs of the results in one row to get the results for the next.

Page 4: GroupTheory

Checking the Result

Γr = A2 + 2E + T2

Dimension check: d = 1 +(2)(2) + 3 = 8 = dr

Sum check:

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

E 2 -1 2 0 0

E 2 -1 2 0 0

T2 3 0 -1 -1 1

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0

Page 5: GroupTheory

Trouble Shooting

U The sum across a row is not divisible by the order h.

L An error has been made in one or more of the products,probably while changing signs or multiplying from one row tothe next; e.g.,

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0 G G/24

A1 8 -8 12 -12 0 0 0

A2 8 8 12 12 0 40

L An error was made in generating the original reduciblerepresentation; e.g.,

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -1 0 G G/24

A1 8 -8 12 -6 0 6

L You forgot to multiply by the number of operations in the classwhen generating the first row; e.g.,

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0 G G/24

A1 8 -8 12 -2 0 10

Page 6: GroupTheory

Trouble Shooting

U The sum of the dimensions of the found irreducible representationsdoes not equal the dimension of the reducible representation.

L One or more of the lines for individual species is faulty in a waythat happens to be divisible by h; e.g.,

Td E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd

Γr 8 -1 4 -2 0 G G/24

A1 8 -8 12 -12 0 0 0

A2 8 -8 12 12 0 24 1

E 16 8 24 0 0 48 2

T1 24 0 -12 -12 0 0 0

T2 24 0 12 12 0 48 2

d = 1 + (2)(2) +(2)(3) = 11 … 8 = dr

Page 7: GroupTheory

Practice Reduction Worksheet

D4h E 2C4 C2 2C2' 2C2

" i 2S4 σh 2σv 2σd

Γ 15 1 -1 -3 -1 -3 -1 5 3 1 G G/h

A1g

A2g

B1g

B2g

Eg

A1u

A2u

Biu

B2u

Eu

Page 8: GroupTheory

Practice Reduction Worksheet - Solution

D4h E 2C4 C2 2C2' 2C2

" i 2S4 σh 2σv 2σd

Γ 15 1 -1 -3 -1 -3 -1 5 3 1 G G/h

A1g 15 2 -1 -6 -2 -3 -2 5 6 2 16 1

A2g 15 2 -1 6 2 -3 -2 5 -6 -2 16 1

B1g 15 -2 -1 -6 2 -3 2 5 6 -2 16 1

B2g 15 -2 -1 6 -2 -3 2 5 -6 2 16 1

Eg 30 0 2 0 0 -6 0 -10 0 0 16 1

A1u 15 2 -1 -6 -2 3 2 -5 -6 -2 0 0

A2u 15 2 -1 6 2 3 2 -5 6 2 32 2

Biu 15 -2 -1 -6 2 3 -2 -5 -6 2 0 0

B2u 15 -2 -1 6 -2 3 -2 -5 6 -2 16 1

Eu 30 0 2 0 0 6 0 10 0 0 48 3

Γ = A1g + A2g + B1g + B2g + Eu + 2A2u + B2u + 3Eu

Dimension check: dr = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + (2)(1) + 1 + (3)(2) = 15

Page 9: GroupTheory

Reducing Representations with Imaginary Characters

! Certain groups (Cn, n $3; Cnh, n $3; S2n; T; Th) have irreducible

representations that contain the imaginary integer i = .&1

! Imaginary irreducible representations are always shown as complex-conjugate pairs on successive lines of the character table and aregiven a shared Mulliken symbol designation of a doubly-degeneraterepresentation (e.g., E).

! Both representations of a complex-conjugate pair are individual non-degenerate representations in their own right.

! For real physical problems, if one imaginary representation iscontained in the reducible representation for a property, then thecomplex conjugate for that representation must also be present inequal number.

! For convenience, complex conjugate pairs of representations areoften added together to give a real-character representation, which isa reducible representation with dr = 2.

L We will always designate such combined real-characterrepresentations with braces around the Mulliken symbol of thecomplex conjugate pair; e.g., {E}.

! If a combined real-character representation is used with the standardreduction formula, the result given for the number of occurrences ofthe combined representataion (ni) will be twice its true value.

L If using the standard reduction formula, divide the result for anycombined real-character representation of a complex-conjugatepair by 2.

Page 10: GroupTheory

Example of Reducing a Representation in a GroupWith Imaginary Irreducible Representations

Generating a test representation in C4h:

Γr = 2Bg + {Eg} + Au

C4h E C4 C2 C43 i S4

3 σh S4

Bg 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1

Bg 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1

{ Eg} 2 0 -2 0 2 0 -2 0

Au 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1

Γr 5 -1 1 -1 3 -3 -1 -3

Reduction work sheet:

C4h E C4 C2 C43 i S4

3 σh S4

Γr 5 -1 1 -1 3 -3 -1 -3 G Σ/8

Ag 5 -1 1 -1 3 -3 -1 -3 0 0

Bg 5 1 1 1 3 3 -1 3 16 2

{ Eg} 10 0 -2 0 6 0 2 0 16 2 L 1

Au 5 -1 1 -1 -3 3 1 3 8 1

Bu 5 1 1 1 -3 -3 1 -3 0 0

{ Eu} 10 0 -2 0 -6 0 -2 0 0 0 L 0

Result: Γr = 2Bg + {Eg} + Au q.e.d.

Page 11: GroupTheory

Group-Subgroup Relationships

! When a structural change occurs, there is often a group-subgrouprelationship between the original and new structures.

! If the new structure belongs to a point group that is a subgroup of thepoint group of the original structure, then descent in symmetry hasoccurred.• Descent in symmetry may cause formerly degenerate properties to

become distinct non-degenerate properties.

! If the new structure belongs to a higher-order group of which the oldstructure’s point group is a subgroup, then ascent in symmetry hasoccurred.• Ascent in symmetry may cause formerly distinct non-degenerate

properties to become degenerate.

! Observing changes in degeneracy (e.g., splitting or coalescing ofbands in spectra) can be revealing of structure changes.

! Knowledge of group-subgroup relationships can simplify the work ofgroup theory applications by solving the problem in a smaller-ordersubgroup and correlating the results to the true group.

Page 12: GroupTheory

A

MA

A A

A

A

I Oh (h = 48)

A

MB

B A

A

B

V C3v (h = 6)

C

MA

A B

B

C

IV C2v (h = 4)

B

MA

A A

A

B

II D4h (h = 16)

B

MA

A A

A

C

III C4v (h = 8)

Group-Subgroup Relationships AmongSubstituted Octahedral Molecules

Page 13: GroupTheory

Characters of Group-Subgroup Related Representations

! Groups that have a group-subgroup relationship have relatedrepresentations whose characters are the same for the sharedoperations in the two groups.

! Between a group and any of its subgroups, representations arisingfrom the same vector basis will have the same χ(r) values for alloperations that occur in both groups.

Characters for Shared Operations in D4h and C4v

D4h E 2C4 C2 2C2' 2C2" i 2S4 σh 2σv 2σd C4v

A1g 1 1 1 1 1 A1

A2g 1 1 1 -1 -1 A2

B1g 1 -1 1 1 -1 B1

B2g 1 -1 1 -1 1 B2

Eg 2 0 -2 0 0 E

A1u 1 1 1 -1 -1 A2

A2u 1 1 1 1 1 A1

B1u 1 -1 1 -1 1 B2

B2u 1 -1 1 1 -1 B1

Eu 2 0 -2 0 0 E

Page 14: GroupTheory

A1g

A2g

B1g

B2g

Eg

A1u

A2u

B1u

B2u

Eu

Rz

x2-y2

x2+y2, z2

xy

(Rx, Ry) (xz, yz)

z

(x, y)

D4h

A1

A2

B1

B2

E

Rz

x2-y2

xy

C4v

z, x2+y2, z2

(x, y) (Rx, Ry) (xz, yz)

Correlation Diagram for D4h and C4v

! Those species in both groups that are not associated with a listed unitvector transformation share a vector basis that is simply not one ofthose routinely listed.

Page 15: GroupTheory

Lifting Degeneracies

! Degenerate representations may be spit into lower-orderrepresentations (non-degenerate or a mixture of double and non-degenerate representations) in a subgroup that is too small to havehigher-order degeneracies.

Characters for Shared Operations of C4v and C2v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

E C2 σv, σv’ C2v

A1 1 1 1 A1

A2 1 1 -1 A2

B1 1 1 1 A1

B2 1 1 -1 A2

E 2 -2 0 B1 + B2

! The characters of E in C4v form a reducible representation in C2v, ΓE,which reduces to B1 and B2.

C2v E C2 σv σv’

B1 1 -1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 -1 1

E 2 -2 0 0

Page 16: GroupTheory

C4v

A1

A2

B1

B2

E

C2v

A1

A2

B1

B2

Correlation Diagram for C4v and C2v

Page 17: GroupTheory

Reducing Representations of C4444v and D4444h

! The standard reduction equation cannot be used with groups thathave h = 4, like C4v and D4h.

L Work-around technique:• Set up and solve the problem in a finite subgroup (e.g., C2v for C4v,

D2h for D4h).• Correlate the results in the subgroup to the true infinite-order

group, using either a partial correlation table or by matchingshared vectors in the related groups.

! Complete correlations to an infinite group are not possible, becausethere are an infinite number of irreducible representations

! A partial correlation table is sufficient, because only a limitednumber of irreducible representations in either C4v or D4h are relatedto real physical properties.

Page 18: GroupTheory

Partial Correlation Tables for C4444v and D4444h

C4v C2v

A1 = G+ A1

A2 = G- A2

E1 = Π B1 + B2

E2 = ∆ A1 + A2

D4h D2h

Gg+ Ag

Gg– B1g

Πg B2g + B3g

∆g Ag + B1g

Gu+ B1u

Gu– Au

Πu B2u + B3u

∆u Au + B1u

Page 19: GroupTheory

ji

di2 ' h ' j

i

[χi(E)]2

Relationships from theGreat Orthogonality Theorem

1. The sum of the squares of the dimensions of all the irreduciblerepresentations is equal to the order of the group:

C3v E 2C3 3σv h = 6

A1 1 1 1 di 2 = 1

A2 1 1 -1 di 2 = 1

E 2 -1 0 di 2 = 4

Σdi2 = 6

2. The number of irreducible representations of a group is equal to thenumber of classes.

3. In a given representation (irreducible or reducible) the characters forall operations belonging to the same class are the same.

Page 20: GroupTheory

jR

[χi(R)]2 ' h ' jRc

gc[χi(Rc)]2

jRc

gcχi(Rc)χj(Rc) ' 0

Relationships from theGreat Orthogonality Theorem

4. The sum of the squares of the characters in any irreduciblerepresentation equals the order of the group:

C3v E 2C3 3σv h = 6

A1 1 1 1 (1)(1) + (2)(1) + (3)(1) = 6

A2 1 1 -1 (1)(1) + (2)(1) + (3)(1) = 6

E 2 -1 0 (1)(4) + (2)(1) + (3)(0) = 6

5. Any two different irreducible representations are orthogonal:

C3v E 2C3 3σv

A2 1 1 -1

E 2 -1 0 Ggcχiχj

gcχiχj (1)(1)(2) = 2 (2)(1)(-1) = -2 (3)(-1)(0) = 0 2 – 2 + 0 = 0

Page 21: GroupTheory

jRc

gcχi(Rc)χj(Rc) ' hδij

Relationships from theGreat Orthogonality Theorem

Combining points 4 and 5:

Kronecker delta function, δij:

δij = 0 if i … j

δij = 1 if i = j

Page 22: GroupTheory

dp ' ki

di

Direct Products of

Irreducible Representations

Any product of irreducible representations is also a representation of thegroup.

ΓaΓbΓc... = Γabc...

The character χ(R) for an operation R in a product representation is theproduct of the characters of R in the component representations.

χa(R)χb(R)χc(R)... = χabc...(R)

The dimension of a product representation, dp, is the product of thedimensions of the component representations.

Page 23: GroupTheory

Relationships of Direct Products

1. If all the combined irreducible representations are nondegenerate,then the product will be a nondegenerate representation, too.

Partial Character Table for C4v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Example:

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

Page 24: GroupTheory

Relationships of Direct Products

2. The product of a nondegenerate representation and a degeneraterepresentation is a degenerate representation.

Partial Character Table for C4v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Example:

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Page 25: GroupTheory

Relationships of Direct Products

3. The direct product of any representation with the totally symmetricrepresentation is the representation itself.

Partial Character Table for C4v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Example:

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Page 26: GroupTheory

Relationships of Direct Products

4. The direct product of degenerate representations is a reduciblerepresentation.

Partial Character Table for C4v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Example:

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

E 2 0 -2 0 0

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Γp 4 0 4 0 0

By systematic reduction:

Γp = A1 + A2 + B1 + B2

Page 27: GroupTheory

Relationships of Direct Products

5. The direct product of an irreducible representation with itself is orcontains the totally symmetric representation.

Partial Character Table for C4v

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

A1 1 1 1 1 1

A2 1 1 1 -1 -1

B1 1 -1 1 1 -1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

E 2 0 -2 0 0

Examples:

Nondegenerate self-product

C4v E 2C4 C2 2σv 2σd

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

B2 1 -1 1 -1 1

A1 1 1 1 1 1

Degenerate self-product (as previously seen)

ΓEΓE = Γp = A1 + A2 + B1 + B2

Page 28: GroupTheory

hnA ' jc

gcχiχr ' jc

gcχAχp ' jc

gcχp

hnA ' jc

gcχp ' jc

gcχaχb ' hδab

Relationships of Direct Products

6. Only the direct product of a representation with itself is or contains thetotally symmetric representation. Moreover, the self-product contains thetotally symmetric representation only once

Proof: How many times does the totally symmetric representation occur inany direct product?

From the reduction equation, where χi = χA = 1 for all R of the totallysymmetric representation,

But χp = χaχb for Γp = ΓaΓb. Also, Γa and Γb must be orthogonal. Thus,

Y nA = δab

Only the self-product contains the totally symmetric representation, andthen only once.

Page 29: GroupTheory

Direct Products of Representationswith Symmetry or Anti-symmetry

to a Specific Operation

In general:sym × sym = symanti-sym × anti-sym = symanti-sym × sym = anti-sym

In terms of Mulliken symbols:

g × g = gu × u = gu × g = u

N × N = NO × O = NO × N = O