Howard - The White House - American or Roman (Set Against Roman Catholic JFK Presidency)(1960)

8/13/2019 Howard - The White House - American or Roman (Set Against Roman Catholic JFK Presidency)(1960)

1/32


2/32

THE WHITE HOUSE AMERICAN OR ROMAN?

Should a Roman Catholic be the head of the government of the United

States when the Roman hierarchy has always been opposed to many of

our American free-doms? What about a Catholic President?The complacency and misapplied spirit of "tolerance," on the part ofmany American citizens, has almost become a virtue. "Be careful; don'tsay anything that would question a man's religion," is the word of thehour in many circles. Yet, there is so much under the cloak of religion

(from nudism to Hinduism) it behooves responsible men to remove the

cloak and see if all this "religion" is from God or Satan. All one need dois read history to ascertain the fact that Roman Catholi-cism is notexclusively religious, but has always been political in her aims and

actions; sometimes more political than religious.

NOT VOTING ON RELIGION

It must be remembered that in deciding whether or not a Roman

Catholic shall be President, is not a matter of penalizing a man politically

because of his religion. It is not that America will rise up and cast a voteagainst a man's religion, but it is a matter of defeating a powerful system,organized in the name of religion, which seeks to overthrow many of ourcherished freedoms and ultimately make the church (Catholic) the

supreme guardian of the State.Surely, we must recognize the fact that the members of the Catholic

Church in America, no doubt, by far the majority, are honest and sincereAmerican citizens who are not fully aware of the designs and aims of thehierarchy with respects to the conflicting issues of Church and State. But,question: What can a private in the army do when an order, or directive,

has been handed down by the Commander and Chief, the Generals,and the

2


3/32

Admirals? If there is any doubt about what may happen when members of

the Catholic Church rebel against the Church and her authority, one needonly read history to learn that thousands of Catholics have been put todeath because of rebellion against the "powers that be" in the Catholic

Church. Heretics (those who rebel, or deny the Catholic faith) may be

ordered murdered!No, we would not vote for or against a man just because of his

religion, but suppose a man's religious convictions and allegiancesinvolves his fellowman's Constitutional Rights? For example, would

American citizens wish to elect the head of Jehovah's Witnesses, a

religious sect, much opposed to many civil statutes, as the President of theUnited States? Would American citizens want to elect a "religious" man,like Oral Roberts, the "fake healer," as the national head of the HealthDepartment? It is not a matter of opposing a man because of his

"religion," but the matter of a man's religion influencing him to opposeconstitutional rights. There can be no doubt about it, religious convictionsmay affect ones fitness for civil office, especially the high office of thePresident of the United States.

ROME NEVER CHANGES

Rome never changes, she boasts. "All dogmatic decrees of the Popemade with or without his general council, are infallible and irreformable.Once made no pope or council can reverse them. There is no choice left

to prelates about enforcing them on the clergy and people . . .". 'Catholic

World, June 1871, page 422."The Pope is the supreme judge, even of civil laws. and therefore is

incapable of being under any true obligation to them." Civilita Cattolica,Vol. VIII, page.. 663.

"As the true God can tolerate no strange gods, the true Church of

Christ (Catholic) can tolerate no strange churches beside herself, or. whatamounts to the same, she can recognize none as theoretically justified."Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. XIV, page 766.

3


4/32

PRIVATE BELIEF AND CITIZENSHIP DUTY

Senator John F. Kennedy, a presidential hopeful, has attempted towhite-wash these issues by stating that a public official can distinguish

between his private beliefs and his public duty.

"Catholic judges can and do grant divorces every day... even though inprivate life they may not believe in them," Mr. Kennedy declared. (UPINews Release, March 8, 1960).

Surely Senator Kennedy, being a Catholic, is not ignorant of theRoman Catholic doctrine on this issue. I quote from Pope Pius XII, his

statement to members of the Tribunal of Rota, November 13, 1949, thesame statement reaffirmed before a group of United States Senators,November 17, 1949:

"To take a particular case, a Catholic judge cannot pronounce asentence of civil divorce, when it is a question of a marriage that is valid

before God and His (Catholic) Church."

Yes, a Catholic judge may pronounce a divorce incases which the Catholic Church does not consider legal marriages, (non-Catholic), but Pope Pius XII declared no Catholic judge may grant adivorce if it is a Catholic marriage, unless of course, sanctioned by thechurch. Mr. Kennedy didn't state the fact that the Catholic Churchconsiders all civil marriages, or, non-Catholic marriages, as illegal, or

illegitimate marriages.PROTESTANT MOTHERS CONCUBINES

"But impious laws taking no account of the sacredness of this greatsacrament, placed it on the same level as all merely civil contracts; andthe deplorable results has been that citizens, desecrating the holy dignity

of marriage, have lived in legal concubinage instead of Christianmatrimony" (Pope Leo XIII, Life of Leo, XIII, 332).

"The Church does not consider merely civil marriage

_4


5/32

as marriage in any sense" (Penal Legislation in New-Code of CanonLaw, 1918, p. 298).

"A civil marriage is only licensed cohabitation. There should be no

such legal abomination, and the (Catholic) Church should be supremejudge of the marriage relation." Western Watchman, March 28, 1912,a Catholic

journal.

Could it be that Senator Kennedy repudiates the statement of Pope PiusXII, Nov. 6, 1949, when he said, "A judge may never oblige any person

to perform an act contrary to the law of God and of His (Roman Catholic)Church . . . Wherefore he cannot pronounce a penal sentence whichwould be equivalent to approval of such law"? No faithful Catholicrepudiates these declarations of the Pope!

Senator Kennedy's double-talk about Catholic public officialsdistinguishing between private beliefs and public duties will not deceivethose who face the facts. Roman Catholicism does not admit many of- thecivil rights and liberties enjoyed by the citizens of the United States andwill not permit them, if ever she has the power to contain them.

VATICAN REPUDIATES KENNEDY'S CLAIM

On the date of May 19, 1960, the Vatican boldly asserts that theCatholic Church is in the field of politics and has the "right and duty tointervene" in the political field and guide her membership in their politicaland civil activities. There can be no misunderstanding of the followingquotation, in spite of the claims made by Senator Kennedy that a Catholicmay separate his religious obligations and loyalties from his citizenshipduties. Hear the quotation! Are you listening?

VATICAN PAPER SAYS POLITICS CHURCH FIELD ROME(NYT) Osservatore Romano the Vatican newspaper, Tues-

5


6/32

day stated that the Roman Catholic hierarchy had "the right and the duty to intervene" in thepolitical field to guide its flock. The newspaper rejected what it termed "the absurd split ofconscience between the believer and the citizen."

However, Osservatore Romano made it clear that its stern pronouncement was valid forRoman Catholic laymen everywhere. It deplored "the great confusion of ideas that is

spreading, especially in some nations and also among Catholics, with regard to the relationsbetween Catholic doctrine and social and political activities, and between the ecclesiasticalhierarchy and the lay faithful in the civil field."

Senator Kennedy should publicly repudiate the Catholic hierarchy ormake a public statement that he, as a faithful member of the CatholicChurch, is subject to the Roman hierarchy which publicly declares thatshe has "the right and the duty to intervene" in the political field and toguide her members in their civil activities as well as religious.

This is no new doctrine of the Catholic Church. She has always beenpolitical. If given time and opportunity she would destroy many of ourcherished civil liberties in America and reduce the American citizenshipto a religo-political society in servitude to the pope in Rome.

WANT A CATHOLIC PRESIDENT?1. Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism claims the

"right to use material and temporal means" to secure her complete controlover her subjects.

2. Would you want a Catholic President when Catholi cism declaresthat "her authority is independent of the civil authority of the State. and is

of a higher order. Though instituted for a spiritual end, the Church has theright to use material and temporal means to secure that end, and in the useof such means as are necessary she has exclusive authority." (Attwater, ACatholic Dictionary, 2nd ed., revised. The McMillan Company, page41)

3. Would you want a Catholic President when the Pope claims theCatholic Church has the right to tell her members how to vote and whomthey should elect as officials. The present Pope, John XXIII, only recently

6


7/32

stated, according to the St. Louis Review, date of Dec. 12, 1958,"Catholics must unite their strength toward the common aid, and the Catholic hierarchy hasthe right and duty of guiding them."

4. Would you want a Catholic President when Roman Catholicism

affirms; according to the Syallabus of Errors, by Pope Pius IX:15. "It is an error to say that Everyman is free to embrace and profess that religion which

he, led by the light of reason, thinks to be true religion."55. "It is error to say that The Church is to be separate from, the State, and the State

From the Church."76. "It is error to say that The Abolition of the Civil Power which the Apostolic See

possesses, would be extremely conducive to the liberty and prosperity of the

Church."77. "It is error to say that in this age of ours it is no longer expedient that the Catholic

religion should be the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other cultswhatsoever."

5. Would you want a Catholic to be President of the United Stateswhen the Roman Hierarchy declares:

THAT: "The State has not the right to the entire direction of public schools." THAT: The Church has the right to require the State not to leave a man free to profess

his own religion."

THAT: "The Church has the right to be perfectly free; the right to define her own rightsand to define the limits in which they are to be exercised."

THAT: "The Church has the right to require the State not to permit free expressionof opinion."

THAT: "The Church is empowered to grant or take away any temporal possession." THAT Catholicism asserts: "All human power is from evil, and must therefore be

standing under the Pope." THAT: "The Pope has the right to give countries and nations which are non-Catholic to

Catholic regents, who can reduce them to slavery."

THAT "The Pope has the right to annul state laws, treaties, con stitutions, etc., toabsolve from obedience thereto, as soon as they seem detrimental to the Church, or

those of the Clergy." THAT: "The Pope can release from every obligation, oath, vow, either before or afterhaving been made."

7


8/32

6. Would you want a Roman Catholic President when the RomanCatholic profession of faith, sanctioned by the Third Plenary Council ofBaltimore, contains the follow ing' oath of allegiance to the Pope, whichsupersedes one's oath of allegiance of the United States of America:

"And I pledge and swear true obedience to the Roman Pontiff, Vicar of Jesus Christ, andsuccessor of the blessed Peter, prince of the Apostles."This oath taken in conflict with, and an enemy to, our oath of naturalization. Our United

States statutes declares:The alien seeking: citizenship must make oath to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelityto any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, in particular, that to which he hasbeen subject."

Does not a citizen by birth owe the same allegiance to his country? Is he a trustworthycitizen when he pledges his oath of allegiance to a foreign potentate?

7. Would you want a Catholic President, even though he might takethe oath of the President, when the Roman Canon law declares:"No oaths are to be kept if they are against the interest of the Church of Rome"?

8: Would you want a Catholic President when the Papacy affirms:

"It is quite unlawful to demand, or defend, or to grant unconditional freedom of thought, ofspeech, of writing, or of worship." Pope Leo XIII.

9, Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism affirms:(1). That "Liberty of conscience is a perverse opinion by fraudulent endeavors of

infidels. It is a corrupt fountain, a folly, a poisonous error." Civillta Cattolica, series IV,Vol. IV, page 430.

(2). That: "The Catholic Press is my voice. I do not say it makes my voice heard, but it ismy voice itself," Pope Pius XI, February 16, 1936.

(3). That: "The (Catholic) Church claims exclusive jurisdiction over the marriagecontract and marital state of Christians in all matters that concern their validity and liceity .. . There is a conflict between the two sets of (State and Church) laws . . . However, thecivil power is bound to respect the divine (Catholic) law on marriage, and all civil lawswhich contradict the divine (Catholic) are necessarily null and void." A PracticalCommentary on The Code of Book Law, 1925, by S. Woyod, imprimature of CardinalHayes, page 563.

8


9/32

(4). That: "The civil laws are binding on the conscience only so-long as they areconformable to the rights of the Catholic Church." A text book for Catholic schools by F. X.Shoupe, approved by Cardinal Manning, page 278.

(5). That: "Freedom of Worship: The inalienable right of all men to worship Godaccording to the teaching of the Catholic Church." Catholic Dictionary.

(6). That: "It would be very erroneous to draw the conclusion that in America is to besought the type of the most desirable status of the Church (Catholic), or that it would beuniversally lawful or expedient for the State and Church to be, as in America, disserveredand divorced." Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII, page 323.

10: Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism affirmsthat the Constitution may be changed?"Constitutions can be changed, and non-Catholic sects may decline to such a point that the

political proscription of them may become feasible and expedient. What protection wouldthey have against a Catholic State? ... It could not permit them to carry on generalpropaganda nor accord their organization certain privileges that had formerly been extendedto all religious corporations, (Church and State by Monsignor J. A. Ryan and F. X. MillarPage 38, 1922; Imprimatur Patrick Hayes, Archbishop, N.Y.)

11. Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism affirmsthat all protestants are heretics and here tics may be justly persecuted or

put to death?"Certainly the church does consider Protestants heretics . . . I do not

doubt, if they were strong enough that the Catholic people-would hinder, evenby death if necessary, the spread of such errors. Fr. Harney (Paulist) 1901,

"Heretics mav be not only excommunicated, but also justlv put to death." St. Thomas,11-11, Q xi, a 3, Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. XIV. P. 768.

"Heresy is an awful crime . . . those who start heresy are more guilty than they who are

traitorous to the civil government. If the State has the right to punish treason with death, theprinciple is the same that concede to the spiritual authority the power of capital punishmentover the arch-traitor to truth and divine revelation . . . A perfect society has the right to itsexistence . . . and the power of capital punishment is acknowledged for a perfect society . . .Now, the Catholic Church is a perfect society, and as such has the right and power to takemeans to safeguard its existence." Catholic Tablet, Brooklyn, N.Y., November 5, 1938.

12. Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism opposes

public schools?"The mission to educate belongs preeminently to theChurch.

9


10/32

(Catholic) . . . the extent of the church's mission is such as to em. brace every nation withoutexception . . . and there is no power on earth that may lawfully oppose or stand in her way . .. For the mere fact that a school gives some religious instruction does not make it fit forCatholic students. To be this it is necessary that all teaching and the whole organization ofthe school, and teachers, syllabus and text-books in every branch be under the direction ofthe Church . . . and this in every grade of school, not only the elementary, but theintermediate and the higher institutions as well. . . . public or private, not merely in regard tothis religious instruction they give, but in regard to every other branch of training."

Encyclical of Pope Pius XI on Education of Youth, December 31,1929. (It should be observed that hundreds of public schools inAmerica today have already been taken over and are being operated bvthe Roman Catholic Church. (V.E.H)

13: Would you want a Catholic President when Catholicism boasts:"Tell us that we think more of the Church (Catholic) than we do the United States: of

course we do. Tell us that we are Catholics first and Americans or English afterwards; ofcourse we are. Tell us, in the conflict between the Church and the civil government we takethe side of the Catholic Church; of course we do. Why, if the government of the UnitedStates were at war with the church, we should say; 'To Hell with the government of theUnited States.' and if the church and all the governments of the world were at war, wewould say: 'To Hell with the governments of the World.' They say we are Catholic first andAmericans decidedly afterwards. There is no doubt about it. We are Catholics first, and welove the church more than we love our own children.

"I love the people of America; I love the people of every nation . . . but let thegovernments of the world steer clear of the Catholic Church, let the emperors, let the kings,and the presidents not come into conflict with the head of the Catholic Church. Because theCatholic Church is everything to all Catholics of the world; they renounce all nationalities

where there is a question of loyalty to her. And why is the Pope so strong? Why is the Popesuch a tremendous power? Why, the Pope is the ruler of the world. Why? Because he is theruler of the Catholics of the world and the Catholics of all the world would die for the rightsof the Pone. He is the Head of the Church, and they would die for the Church . . . TheCatholics of the world are Catholics first and always, they are Americans, they areGermans. etc., afterwards."

The Western Watchman, St. Louis, June 27, 1912; endorsed by(Catholic) Cleveland Universe, November

10


11/32

22, 1912; quoted from the Thrones of the Papal Viceroys Setup in theUnited States, published by Protestant Book Concern, Bible House, NewYork, N. Y., page 21, 22.

CATHOLIC CHURCH POLITICAL POWERAmericans must not be duped into the Catholic molds of propaganda

that the Catholic Church is non-political. The Roman Catholic Church isa sovereign power, having legislative, executive and judicial powers,including the power of coercion. The ruler of the Church, the Pope.claims sovereignty by divine right, and that he is the heir of a small state,the Vatican State, created by the Lateran Treaty of 1929 with Mussolini.This Vatican State is ruled by the same machinery that rules the religiousaspect of the Church. The Vatican State includes 108-acre section ofRome, with extra territorial rights outside of Rome. This Catholic Statehas a full civil government with a flag, police force, courts and postagestamps. Currency, in the form of gold and silver coins, bearing the effigyof the pope, is issued and some 500 national citizens use Vatican

passports when they wish to travel. The Catholic State, theVatican, has armed guards, and, before 1870, it had a full-grownmilitary establishment. According to the first article of its constitution,this Catholic State is a complete autocracy in which "the plenitude oflegislative, executive and judicial power is vested in the Pope."

How could any alert citizen consider the Catholic Church non-political? The Hierarchy does not try to bide it! The National CatholicRegister, November 22, 1959, in a front page feature article, gave thesummary of the annual report of the National Catholic WelfareConference, revealing, beyond any doubt, the aims of the hierarchy withreference to the political affairs in the United States. Quote:

"The increased interest and activity of the Church in the U. S. withinthe areas of government, social wel-

11


12/32

fare, education, family life, youth work, and other fields are highlightedin the annual report to the U. S. Bishops of the voluntary co-ordinatingagency, the NCWC.

"Presented at the hierarchy's annual general meeting, the reports of the

organization's departments and bureaus touched upon almost all facetsof the Church.

"Of prime importance, the NCWC Legal Department noted, waslegislation in such fields as education, taxation, obscenity, immigration,and litigation on a broad range of subjects involving the relationship ofChurch and State."

Could there possibly be any doubt that the Roman Catholic Church is apolitical organization! In conferences she considers the "activities of theChurch in the United States within the areas of government." Such termsas "Legal Department," "Legislation in education, taxation, immigration,and litigation involving relationship of Church and State," can leave nodoubt as to the politics of Catholicism.

PAPACY AND DICTATORSOur own generations have witnessed the alliance of the papacy with

the dictators who sought to conquer the world by bloody conquest. TheKaiser, of World War I. stated, in his Memoirs, Translated by Thomas R.Yboarra. p. 211. Harper & Bros. 1922, that Pope Leo XIII

declared to him that, bv war, if necessary, the "Holy Roman Empireshould be restored," and to this end "Germany must become the Sword ofthe Catholic Church." The Kaiser's own words were:

"It was of interest to me that the Pope said unto me on this occasionthat Germany must become the sword of the Catholic Church. I remarkedthat the old Roman Empire of the German nation no longer existed, and

that conditions had changed. But he stuck to his words." 12


13/32


14/32

Hitler was a product of the Catholic Church. He never renounced theCatholic faith, nor condemned the politi-cal aims and aspirations ofthe Catholic Church. Of his membership in the Catholic Church, hesaid. "This supplied me with the best opportunity to steep myself in the

solemn magnificence of the brilliant feasts of the Church" Mein Kampf.p. 4.

In Hitler's Mein Kampf he approves Catholicism's opposition toProtestantism, the infallibility of Catholic dogmas, Catholicism'sintolerance toward education, the necessity of blind faith, and theinfallibility of the pope. (Mein Kampf, p 293, p 385, p 417, p 507, p 513)

In his admiration of the Catholic Church, Hitler prophetically declared:"Thus the Catholic Church is more secure than ever. It can be

predicted that, as passing phenomena vanish away, she will remain as abeacon light amid the vanish ing elements, attracting blind adherents inever-increas ing numbers."

It should be remembered that a Catholic priest, "Father Staempfle"actually wrote Mein Kampf.

The collusion between the Catholic Church, Hitler, Mussolini, andFranco, now on the pages of history, is in evidence beyond doubt. Can weso easily forget some of the Headlines of the past?

The official Catholic biographer of Pius XII, Kees Van Hoek, declared,

of the pope, "has always been known for ihis strong German leanings."Article 16 of the concordant between Hitler and the Vatican gives the

oath that all German Bishops were forced to take before theReichstatthalter:

"I swear before God and upon the Holy Gospels and promise, asbecomes a bishop, to be loyal to the German Reich and the State. I swear

and promise to respect the constitutional Government and to have itrespected by my clergy."

14


15/32

Shortly after this concordant signed by Cardinal Pa-celli, later PopePius XII, and Catholic Frans von Papen, Cardinal Bertram of Berlinwrote the following declaration to Hitler:

"The Episcopate of all German diocese, as shown by its statements to

the public, was glad to express, as soon as it was possible after the recentchange in the political situation through the declarations of YourExcellency, its sincere readiness to cooperate to the best of its ability withthe new government which has proclaimed as its goal to promoteChristian education, to wage war against Godlessness and immorality, tostrengthen the spirit of sacrifice for the common good, and to promote the

rights of the Church." The Catholic (London) Universe, Aug. 18, 1933.Fritz Thyssen, a rich industrialist, who helped finance Hitler(Thyssen's I Paid Hitler, 1941), testified, in the Swiss Arbeiterzeitung,1940, entitled: "PIUS XII, AS NUNCIO, BROUGHT HITLER TOPOWER," of the Hitler-Vatican Plan. He declared:

"The idea, was to have a sort of Christian Corporate State organized

according to classes, which would be supported by the Churches in theWest by the Catholics, and in the East by the Protestant and by theArmy."

NAZI AND FASCIST DICTATORS, PUPPETS, QUISLINGS,

COLLABORATORS, ALL CATHOLICSAdolf Hitler Nazi Fuehrer ................................................... Roman CatholicBenito Mussolini Italian Duce.................................................. Roman CatholicFrancisco Franco Spanish Caudillo ................................... Roman CathoucAntonio Salazar Portuguese Dictator ........................... Roman CatholicHenri P. Petain Vichy Chief of State .................................... Roman CatholicPierre Laval Vichy Chief of Government ......................... Roman CatholicEmil Hacha Nazi President of Bohemia-Moravia .. Roman CatholicKonrad Henlein "Quisling" of Sudetenland ..................... Roman CatholicLeon M. Degrelle Belgian Rexist Leader .................. Roman CatholicAnte Pavelich Croatian Pogavar ........................................ Roman Catholic

15


16/32


17/32


18/32

CATHOLIC STATE SOVEREIGN POWER

The well known Lateran Treaty of 1929 between the Vatican andDictator Mussolini was designed for intolerant world domination by theCatholic Church. This concordant between the pope and Fascist dictator,Mussolini, was actually a collaboration with the Nazi-Fascist dictators. Adeal was made between the Catholic Church and the dictators, designedto become the world rulers. Among the royalties received from Mussolini

by the Catholic Church were 750 million lire in cash, one billion lire in'Fascist government stock, a 108-acre section, carved out of the heart ofItaly, near Rome, with extra territorial rights outside Rome, the CatholicChurch to be the sole Church of the Fascist State, the pope the ruler ofthe Church by divine right and the heir and head of the Vatican State, theVatican State being ruled by the same head that rules the CatholicChurch, "the plenitude of legislative, executive and judicial power vestedin the Pope."

It can not be denied that the Catholic Church is a Sovereign Power,maintaining legislative, executive, and judicial powers, including the

power of coercion. Some fifty... nations maintain representatives in theVatican and many American-Catholics are determined once again to sendan American representative to the Vatican, which is in violation of theConstitution of the United States government. The pope maintains thelargest court palace in the world where he confers titles of nobility, withsuch papal nobles being entitled to wear uniforms and swords. TheCatholic Vatican State has an active diplomatic corps, headed by theSecretary of State.

How could any true American citizen swear allegiance to this foreignVatican-Catholic State? Does America want the White House to beunder control of the Vatican in Rome?

If America does not open her eyes to the truth that the RomanCatholic Church is a dominant, political power

18


19/32

the day may come when the White House is no longer American, butRoman, and our long cherished American freedoms and liberties willhave vanished away!

CONCORDAT WITH CATHOLIC SPAIN

Catholic Spain is an ideal Catholic State, according to Pope Pius XIIand the Catholic Church. In 1936 Franco rebelled 'against the democraticgovernment, then in power, which dared to abolish the tax exemptions forthe vast domains of the pope. The papacy supported Franco with powerand millions of dollars, for the con-quest. Thousands were murdered and

tortured. The Catholic priests took active part in the bloody battles,murdering their own fellow-Catholic church members because the Popehad given orders.

Zacarias P. Carles, director of Spanish Christian Mission, relating hisexperiences in Madrid when the Franco rebellion began in 1936,declared:

."In July, 1936, I was living in Madrid. This was the month in which our so-called tragicSpanish war started. On the very first day I went to the British and Foreign Bible Society, ofwhich I was the assistant superintendent. While going to my office I had to pass by aconvent. When I was in front of it, I had to hide myself, since from the windows of theRoman church building priests and others with machine-guns were fighting against thepassers-by. Many of them were killed by the priests. When men were able to come near thechurch, it was set on fire and the priests, still wearing their clerical robes, were captured,

carrying their machine guns with them. Then they were shot. They were killed, not becausethey were priests, but because they had been murdering their fellow citizens."I knew at once that our war had been started with the help of the Vatican. Even the Pope

sent $3,000,000 to help Franco. Many Spaniards hate the Roman church on account of herassociation with the bloody Spanish war. Some Spaniards even hate God, since what theyknow of God they know only through the Roman church." End of quotation.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen. Roman Catholicism advocates the use of

force to exterminate those who would oppose her. In the Canon of thePapacy, Code number 15, I quote: "He who kills one that isexcommunicated is no murderer in the legal sense." Unquote.

19


20/32

FREEDOM OF WORSHIP PROHIBITED IN SPAINThe Concordat between Spain and the Vatican reserves exclusive

rights for the Roman Catholic Church, to the exclusion of all otherreligions. The Constitution states, "No public ceremonies or

manifestations will be permitted in any religion other that the Catholicreligion." Protestants in Spain can not have churches. They can neitheradvertise nor hold public religious services. Even if as many as five

people gather together in their own private home to worship, if notCatholics, they are subject to arrest!

What does the pope think of Catholic Spain? Pope Pius XII conferred

on Generalissimo Franco the highest secular decoration bestowed by theVatican, the "Supreme Order of Christ," December 21, 1953.The democratic government in Spain was overthrown, thousands

murdered, thousands subdued to obey the pope in Rome, and the CatholicChurch given complete control, without reservation. The Pope'scompliment, the highest secular decoration possible by the Vatican!

Do you want a Concordat between the Vatican and Washington?Roman Catholicism parades in a cloak of religion, as a religo-politicalpower, seeking to destroy our free institutions in America!

CATHOLIC INTOLERANCE PERSECUTIONThe Christian Science Monitor, Nov. 12, 1950, states, "In Da Aguado

Cesanare (Colombia), Protestant Church schools and missions of the

missionary confiscated. In the same district, two other chapels and eightchurches bombed or otherwise damaged."

The Monitor further states, "On orders of the mayor, all Protestants atToribio Cauca (Colombia), were rounded up, arrested, their Biblesdestroyed, and they were forced to sign, under threat of death, arenunciation of Protestantism."

In this South American country of Colombia thousands have beenmurdered who were opposed to Catholicism.

20


21/32


22/32


23/32


24/32


25/32


26/32


27/32


28/32


29/32


30/32


31/32


32/32

Documents

Howard - The White House - American or Roman (Set Against Roman Catholic JFK Presidency)(1960)