1
13.84 MW of green electricity production 114 MGD of drinking water production (cheaper price) Reduced water feeding flow rate to Jakarta Ability to give attractive rewards for the success of the project BEP within 2 years and NPW value of US$ 36.4 billions Small Hydro 50m Water treatment plant Total head : 50 m Total head loss : 10.8 m No. of turbine : 2 Est. turbine total eff. : 85.94% Power generation : 103 MWh/year Electricity price : US$ 0.11/kWh Est. total area required : 4 ha Est. land cost : US$ 44.88/m 2 Est. lifetime : 30 years Safety factor : 2 Water supply : 6.25 m 3 /s Plant availability : 80% Water treatment capacity : 114MGD Drinking water price : US$ 1/m 3 Year Capital Cost Interest O&M cost Benefit Balance 0 (251,869,856) 0.13 - - (251,869,856) 1 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 (126,782,841) 2 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 14,565,486 3 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 174,289,096 4 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 354,776,775 5 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 558,727,853 The elevation difference between Jakarta -Bogor, and Jakarta - Bandung are 258 and 761 m. Water from Bandung and Bogor are flowing to Jakarta through Citarum, Cisadane, and Cisadea rivers with average debit of approximately 60, 55, and 10 m 3 /s. FACTS High Potential and Kinetic Energy High amount of water BACKGROUND Currently, Jakarta suffers from annual flood disaster. In 2002, losses due to flood in Jakarta was approximately US$ 980 millions and can increase to US$ 2 billions in 2013. Jakarta currently deficit 10m3/s of clean water and will increase to 19m3/s by 2020. Water feeding from Bandung and Bogor is one of the major contributor of flooding and is aggravated by the littering habits of the society and industries along Ciliwung, Cisadane, and Citarum rivers. Power Generation Green Technology Initiatives Water Filtration System OBJECTIVE APPROACH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND BENEFITS Horizontal axis single and double runner Francis turbine is utilized to generate 2.64 and 13.84 MW (required water rate: 10 and 50 m 3 /s ) Water exiting from the turbine is supplied to water (Micro filtration) treatment system with capacity of 114MGD. SCHEMATIC OF HYDRO POWER PLANT Effective Way to Handle Jakarta Flood: A Green Solution Totok Ruki Biyanto 1 , Hermawan Nugroho 2 , Firmansyah 2 , Nabil Al Batati 2 , Petrus Tri Bhaskoro 2 1. Department of Engineering Physics, FTI, Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia 2. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia. . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / SPONSOR Sponsor Sponsor

ICID 2013 - Poster

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ICID 2013 - Poster

13.84 MW of green electricity production

114 MGD of drinking water production (cheaper

price)

Reduced water feeding flow rate to Jakarta

Ability to give attractive rewards for the success of

the project

BEP within 2 years and NPW value of US$ 36.4

billions

Small Hydro

50m

Water treatment plant

Total head : 50 m

Total head loss : 10.8 m

No. of turbine : 2

Est. turbine total eff. : 85.94%

Power generation : 103 MWh/year

Electricity price : US$ 0.11/kWh

Est. total area required : 4 ha

Est. land cost : US$ 44.88/m2

Est. lifetime : 30 years

Safety factor : 2

Water supply : 6.25 m3/s

Plant availability : 80%

Water treatment capacity :

114MGD

Drinking water price : US$

1/m3

Year Capital Cost Interest O&M cost Benefit Balance

0 (251,869,856) 0.13 - - (251,869,856)

1 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 (126,782,841)

2 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 14,565,486

3 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 174,289,096

4 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 354,776,775

5 - 0.13 (11,287,810.08) $169,117,907 558,727,853

• The elevation difference between

Jakarta -Bogor, and Jakarta - Bandung

are 258 and 761 m.

• Water from Bandung and Bogor are

flowing to Jakarta through Citarum,

Cisadane, and Cisadea rivers with

average debit of approximately 60, 55,

and 10 m3/s.

FACTS

High

Potential

and

Kinetic

Energy

High

amount

of water

BACKGROUND

• Currently, Jakarta suffers from annual flood disaster. In

2002, losses due to flood in Jakarta was approximately US$

980 millions and can increase to US$ 2 billions in 2013.

• Jakarta currently deficit 10m3/s of clean water and will

increase to 19m3/s by 2020.

• Water feeding from Bandung and Bogor is one of the major

contributor of flooding and is aggravated by the littering

habits of the society and industries along Ciliwung,

Cisadane, and Citarum rivers.

Power Generation

Green Technology

InitiativesWater Filtration

System

OBJECTIVE

APPROACH

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND BENEFITS

• Horizontal axis single and double runner

Francis turbine is utilized to generate 2.64 and

13.84 MW (required water rate: 10 and 50 m3/s )

• Water exiting from the turbine is supplied to

water (Micro filtration) treatment system with

capacity of 114MGD.

SCHEMATIC OF HYDRO POWER PLANT

Effective Way to Handle Jakarta Flood: A Green SolutionTotok Ruki Biyanto1, Hermawan Nugroho2, Firmansyah2, Nabil Al Batati2, Petrus Tri Bhaskoro2

1. Department of Engineering Physics, FTI, Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

2. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia.

.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT /

SPONSOR

Sponsor Sponsor