Upload
polly-walters
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Institute for Research on World-SystemsDepartment of SociologyUniversity of California, Riverside
IROWS
Alexis Álvarez
Global Governance and US Hegemony:
A Historical Trajectory
History & ConceptualizationWhat constitutes global governance?
Institutional Precursors: Monotheism, trans-continental empires, Magna Carta, capitalism, secularism, socialism, decolonization, modernity, universal suffrage, globalization.
Globalization in its economic, material, linguistic, and other social dimensions is not global governance per se, though its fruition foreshadows its inevitable, cybernetic/legislative consequences.
Integral Components: An interstate system (established during the Treaty of Westphalia), international organizations, and a geopolitical climate mediated by a hegemonic cycle.
law
politicseducation
religion economy
kinship
Functionalist Institutional Lens
The Formalization of Institutions
Religion
Polity
Law
Education
Kinship
Economy
Institutions in Agrarian Societies
Religion
Polity
Law
Education
Kinship
Economy
Institutions during Early Capitalism
Religion
Polity
Law
Education Kinship
Economy
Institutions under Transnational Capitalism
Institutions under Transnational Capitalism
Population
Symbolic
Bases of Power
Coercive
Administrative
Material
Empire Size
Systemic Primacy
Tributary model of systemic
power
Prev
alen
ce o
f G
loba
l Gov
erna
nce
in I
nter
nati
onal
Aff
airs
Tributary Empires
Scope of transportation and communication technology
Core Institutional Differentiation
Early Capitalism
Treaty of Westphalia1648
SecularizationTransnational
CapitalismDecolonization
Concert of Europe1815
Maritime Colonialism
Abolition
United Nations1945 –
League of Nations1919 – 1946
World War I1914 – 1918
World War II1939 – 1945
Proliferation of Transnational
Social Movements and Global Governance Institutions
A historical trajectory of the developing institutional structure of global governance, not scaled
CIA1947 –
American & French Revolutions
1776 & 1789Continent-wide
Colonialism
Hegemony and Global Governancegeopolitical goals
HierarchySovereignty Hegemony Legitimacy
InternalExternal
1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946fr. 0
fr. 10,000,000
fr. 20,000,000
fr. 30,000,000
fr. 40,000,000
fr. 50,000,000
fr. 60,000,000
Total Expenditures (Swiss franks) ILO League Expenditures (Swiss franks)Perm. Court of International Justice (Swiss Franks)
League of Nations Expenditures, Swiss Francs
World War II1939 – 1945
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
25%
27%
29%
31%
33%
35%
UN Budget (Inflation Adjusted US$, 2005) US GDP / Global GDP
Mil
lion
s, U
SD
US GDP as % of Global GDP and Total UN Expenditures
Fall of USSR
Israel Fall of ApartheidKorean War
Viet Nam War
Iraq War I Iraq War II
$0
$200
,000
,000
$400
,000
,000
$600
,000
,000
$800
,000
,000
$1,0
00,0
00,0
00
$1,2
00,0
00,0
00
$1,4
00,0
00,0
00
$1,6
00,0
00,0
00
$1,8
00,0
00,0
00
$2,0
00,0
00,0
00
25%
27%
29%
31%
33%
35%US GDP as % of Global GDP vs. Total UN Expenditures
Pearson’s r = -0.859
$0
$200
,000
,000
$400
,000
,000
$600
,000
,000
$800
,000
,000
$1,0
00,0
00,0
00
$1,2
00,0
00,0
00
$1,4
00,0
00,0
00
$1,6
00,0
00,0
00
$1,8
00,0
00,0
00
$2,0
00,0
00,0
00
25%
27%
29%
31%
33%
35%US GDP as % of Global GDP vs. Total UN Expenditures
Pearson’s r = -0.859
Confidence Core-Periphery Hierarchy
in the UN Core Semiperiphery Periphery
None at all 1650 5570 2628Column % 11.4% 19.3% 17.3%
Not very much 4962 9800 4561Column % 34.2% 33.9% 30.1%Quite a lot 6554 10609 4790Column % 45.2% 36.7% 31.6%
A great deal 1337 2947 3173Column % 9.2% 10.2% 20.9%
Column Total 14503 28926 15152
World Values Survey 2005: World Citizenship and Confidence in the United Nations
Core-Periphery Hierarchy
World Citizen Core Semiperiphery Periphery
Strongly Disagree 783 2105 672Column % 5.4% 6.9% 4.7%
Disagree 2809 5392 1936Column % 19.2% 17.6% 13.5%
Agree 7603 14546 6039Column % 52.0% 47.4% 42.1%
Strongly Agree 3433 8644 5685Column % 23.5% 28.2% 39.7%
Column Total 14628 30687 14332