Upload
dothu
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
Integrating Spheres in Molecular Spectrophotometry
Theory and Practice
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
General Sphere Theory
Integrating Spheres
3
Types of Sphere Measurements
Total Reflectance (Specular + Diffuse)
Diffuse Only Reflectance
Scatter Transmission
Center Mount Absorbance
4
Scatter Transmission Configuration
5
The Center Mount
6
Diffuse (Lambersion) Reflectance Sphere Theory
Radiant Flux From Sphere Wall After N Reflections
One Wall Reflection N Wall Reflections
Specular vs. Diffuse Background Correction Problem
The “Specular” Component “Hot Spot” Problem
Diffuse
Sample
10% Specular
Sample
90% Specular
Sample
The Effect of Sample Behavior on Detector Output
Typical Specular Samples With Spectralon Background Correction
NIST Mirror
Polished Aluminum
Silica Plate
60 mm Sphere
Silica Plate Sample Using Different Materials in Background Correction
Green – Spectralon Background Correction
Blue – NiIST Mirror Background Correction
Red – NIST Mirror %RC Mode
60 mm Sphere
Low Glass Reflectance: Different Materials in Background Correction
60 mm Sphere
Green – Spectralon Background Correction
Blue – NIST Mirror Background Correction
Red – NIST Mirror Background Correction, %RC Mode
Sphere Port Fraction
The port fraction is defined as the ratio of the total port area relative to the total internal surface area of the sphere.
A low port fraction ensures good integration of the sample signal before it reaches the sphere’s detector.
The port fraction of a 150 mm sphere is 2.5 %
A 60 mm sphere has a port fraction of 11.3%.
CIE color recommends lower than 10%
ASTM D1003-95 (haze) lower than 4%
60 mm Sphere Pros & Cons
PROS Sphere Efficiency – Smaller spheres are more efficient collectors
Noise Level – Higher throughput systems, therefore, signal-to-noise is usually better
Sample Beam Size – Smaller sample beam spot size better matches small test samples
Cost – Less expensive
CONS Port Fraction – High port fraction: typically above 10%.
Measurement Accuracy – Sphere errors or hot spots may occur in small spheres: errors may not be completely corrected by a sphere’s baffles due to space constraints
Substitution Errors
Sample Beam Size – Small sample beam size means multiple locations must be measured on inhomogeneous samples.
150 mm Sphere Pros & Cons
PROS Port Fraction – Low port fraction: typically 2-4%. Meets CIE color measurement specifications.
Measurement Accuracy – Highest measurement accuracy is achieved with large integrating spheres since sphere errors can be minimized, resulting in very homogeneous light flux and minimal hot spots in sphere.
Sample Beam Size – Large sample beam size: good coverage of inhomogeneous samples.
CONS Sphere efficiency – Not as efficient as smaller spheres: large sphere diameter attenuates the sample beam energy more than a small sphere of similar design.
Noise Level – Signal-to-noise may be lower for highly absorbing samples (may have to perform scans at larger slit widths, slower scan speeds, or with reference beam attenuation to compensate).
Sample Beam Size – Large sample beam spot size overfills small test samples, requiring masking or small spot kits which lead to additional energy loss.
Cost – More expensive
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
Considerations When Using Spheres
150 mm Sphere: How Low is Zero
20
Red - Black Spectralon
Black – Open Port Green – Light Trap
Light trap is lowest, but not zero due to air scatter inside sphere
60 mm Sphere: How Low is Zero
21
Red - Black Spectralon
Black – Open Port Green – Light Trap
Open port is lowest, and almost zero
Lowest Reflectance Sample for Each Sphere Size in %R
22
Red – Light Trap, 150 mm Sphere Size
Green – Open Port, 60 mm Sphere Size
60 mm sphere size lower due to shorter diameter of sphere
Low Reflectance Sphere Comparison with Absorbance Analog Scale
23
Red – Light Trap, 150 mm Sphere Size
Green – Open Port, 60 mm Sphere Size
Maximum Absorbance Values: 150 mm Sphere vs. Standard Detector
24
Problems Due to Thick Non-Chamfored Sphere Ports
Leads to a lower %R artifact
Problems Due to Recessed Sample Position
Leads to a lower %R artifact
Problems Due to Lateral Diffusion by Translucent Sample
Leads to a lower %R artifact
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
Non-Homogeneous Sample Texture
Asymmetric Sample: Different Positions of a Woven Fabric
Woven Fabric Spectral Sample Set 1: Full Sphere Wavelength Range
Note Wavelength Dependent Variations at Longer Wavelengths
Woven Fabric Spectral Set 1: Detector and Grating Change
Woven Fabric Spectral Sample Set 2: Full Sphere Wavelength Range
Note Fabric Sample Difference From Set 1
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
The UL 270 Large Integrating Sphere
Problems With Sphere Scatter Transmission Measurements of Non–Lambertian Samples
Transmittance Measurement of “Pure” Specular Sample
Transmittance Measurement of a Lambertian Diffuse Sample
Transmittance Measurement of Any Sample
A Non-Lambertian Sample: Pyramid Glass for Solar Cells
150 mm Integrating Sphere: Excellent for Diffuse and Total Reflection
Limitations When Measuring Scatter Transmission of Some Non-Lambertian
Scatter Transmission Of A Non-Lambertian Diffuse Sample
transmitance at 550 nm
0.24
0.25
0.26
0.27
0.28
0.29
0.30
0.31
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
sphere port diameter in mm
As a Function of Sphere Scatter Transmission Port Diameter
Spectrophotometer Beam Through Pyramid Glass
screen
A Non-Lambertian Sample
Problems in Measuring Pattern Glass Samples
• Sphere ports are to small to capture all transmitted or reflected radiation
• Sphere wall uniformity is compromised by ports with different target materials
• Screening is insufficient for diffuse transmission
• The spectrophotometer beam is small compared to surface structures
• The beam size in the NIR is wavelength dependent
• Maximum sample size is too small for tempered glass
An Experiment to Simulate Different Port Diameters
44
Simulating a Larger Port Size
45
Port Experiment Step 1
46
Port Experiment Step 2
47
Port Experiment Step 3
48
Port Experiment Step 4: Add Spectral Measurements
49
The UL 270 Integrating Sphere
Note the large port area
The UL 270 Sphere Design
The UL 270 Can Measure Both Transmission and Reflectance
The UL 270 Diffuse Transmission Mode
The UL 270 Diffuse Reflection Mode
Sphere Energy Comparison
Energy Transmission
Sample date 270 mm Sphere,
sample as is 150 mm Sphere, sample
polished
05/12/2008 91.18 91.08
07/05/2008 91.26 91.03
10/05/2008 91.26 90.77
12/05/2008 90.99 90.89
© 2012 Perkin Elmer
Questions?