Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930 1
Intro to parallel and series/parallel HEV architectures
Vehicle controller design review
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Parallel HEV
• ICE and ED2 mechanically coupled to combine traction powerniceTice + n2T2 = nT
• Reduced size ED2; in a “micro” hybrid, ED2 is a low‐power starter/alternator• One electric drive: it is not possible to have electric drive traction and battery charging at the same time
• Requires multi‐gear transmission
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
n T
2
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Series/Parallel HEV
• ICE, ED1 and ED2 mechanically coupled via a planetary gear; ICE and electric drive can combine traction power
• Capable of realizing HEV efficiency improvements• Simple single‐gear transmission
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
3
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Series/parallel HEV example: 2004 Prius
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
208 V1.3 kWhNiMH
500 V
boost
buck
50 kW PMSM
25 kW PMSM
57 kW @ 5000 rpm
112 TnTnnTnT iceice
12 4.04.1 nnnn ice
ring = ED2, n = n2planets = ICE, nicesun = ED1, n1
Overall drive train system power rating: 82
kW (110 hp)
Planetary gear (“power split device (PSD)”) animation: http://eahart.com/flash/PSDAnim.swf
4
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Series/parallel HEV example: 2004 Prius1
2
Power electronics (2 inverters and a boost DC‐DC)
HEV drive train
5
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Modes of operation: starting and low‐speed
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
208 V1.3 kWhNiMH
500 V
boost
buck
50 kW PMSM
25 kW PMSM
57 kW @ 5000 rpm
ring = ED2, n = n2planets = ICE, nicesun = ED1, n1
Overall drive train system power rating: 82
kW (110 hp)
6
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Modes of operation: cruising
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
208 V1.3 kWhNiMH
500 V
boost
buck
50 kW PMSM
25 kW PMSM
57 kW @ 5000 rpm
ring = ED2, n = n2planets = ICE, nicesun = ED1, n1
Overall drive train system power rating: 82
kW (110 hp)
7
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Modes of operation: full acceleration
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
208 V1.3 kWhNiMH
500 V
boost
buck
50 kW PMSM
25 kW PMSM
57 kW @ 5000 rpm
ring = ED2, n = n2planets = ICE, nicesun = ED1, n1
Overall drive train system power rating: 82
kW (110 hp)
8
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Modes of operation: deceleration/braking
ICE
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
2
Electricmotor/
generator2
Transmission
ED2
Energystorage
Wheels(radius rv)
Fuel
VDC
n2 T2nv Tv
nice Tice
Fvv
3-phaseinverter/rectifier
1
Electricmotor/
generator1
ED1
n1 T1
DC-DCVbatt
+
_
n T
208 V1.3 kWhNiMH
500 V
boost
buck
50 kW PMSM
25 kW PMSM
57 kW @ 5000 rpm
ring = ED2, n = n2planets = ICE, nicesun = ED1, n1
Overall drive train system power rating: 82
kW (110 hp)
9
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Summary• HEV
– Electrified drivetrain offers efficiency improvements– Battery system: relatively small energy capacity, but relatively large power rating
• PHEV or EV– Fuel displaced by electricity– Same efficiency improvements as HEV– Battery system: large energy capacity and large power rating
10
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Vehicle Controller Design Review
11
Gphy(s)fv(s)
v(s)GEV(s)Gc(s)+–vref(s)fvc(s)
sGsG z
cmc1)(
System small‐signal model:
Vehicle controller
Goal: choose the PI controller parameters Gcm and wz to minimize settling time Tsettle upon a step in vref, subject to an overshoot constraint
EV example: Mv = 1500; % Vehicle curb weight + 250 kg passenger and cargoCd = 0.26; % Coefficient of Drag Cr = 0.01; % Coefficient of Friction Av = 2.16; % Front area [m^2]rho_air = 1.204; % Air density [kg/m^3]
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930 12
phy
phyphy sGsG
1
1)( 0 N(m/s) 0.2211
10
VACG
vdphy
mHz 0.4821 1
v
vdphy M
VACf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930 13
sGsG z
cmc1)( )()()( sGsGsT phyc
10
1VAC
Gvd
phy
v
vdphy M
VACf 1
21
phy
phyphy sGsG
1
1)( 0 Loop gain T(s): fz < fphy
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Loop gain T(s): fz = fphy
14
sGsG z
cmc1)( )()()( sGsGsT phyc
10
1VAC
Gvd
phy
v
vdphy M
VACf 1
21
phy
phyphy sGsG
1
1)( 0
sMGsT vcm /)(
v
cmc M
Gf21
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930 15
sGsG z
cmc1)( )()()( sGsGsT phyc
10
1VAC
Gvd
phy
v
vdphy M
VACf 1
21
phy
phyphy sGsG
1
1)( 0
v
cmc M
Gf21
sMGsT vcm /)(
Loop gain T(s): fz > fphy
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Example Gc(s)
16
sGsG z
cmc1)(
Hz 0.11 21
v
cmc M
Gf
(m/s)N 1000cmG Hz 2.0zf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Loop gain T: magnitude and phase responses
17
-50
0
50
100
150
Mag
nitu
de (d
B)
10-4
10-2
100
-180
-135
-90
Phas
e (d
eg)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (Hz)
fc = 0.17 Hz
m= 40o
(m/s)N 1000cmG
Hz 2.0zf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30S
peed
[mph
]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-5000
0
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-50
0
50
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
Step vref response
18
v
vref
fv [N]
fr [N]
pv [kW]
p = 9.7 %
Tsettle = 7.45 s
Overshoot computed with respect to final vref = 20 mph
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Improved design: choose fz = fphy
19
phy
phyphy sGsG
1
1)( 0
N(m/s) 0.2211
10
VACG
vdphy
mHz 0.4821 1
v
vdphy M
VACf
(m/s)N 1000cmG
mHz 48.0 phyz ff
kg 1500vM
sGsG z
cmc1)(
sMGsT vcm /)(
Hz 0.11 21
v
cmc M
Gf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Loop gain T(s)
20
-50
0
50
100M
agni
tude
(dB)
10-4
10-2
100
-91
-90.5
-90
-89.5
-89
Phas
e (d
eg)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (Hz)
fc = 0.11 Hz
m= 90o
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Step vref response
21
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20S
peed
[mph
]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
p = 0 %
Tsettle = 5.54 s
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Improved design: choose fz = fphy,increase fc by increasing Gcm
22
(m/s)N 10000cmG
mHz 48.0 phyz ff
sGsG z
cmc1)(
sMGsT vcm /)(
Hz 1.1 21
v
cmc M
Gf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Loop gain T(s)
23
-50
0
50
100
150M
agni
tude
(dB)
10-4
10-2
100
-91
-90.5
-90
-89.5
-89
Phas
e (d
eg)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (Hz)
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Step vref response
24
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30S
peed
[mph
]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
20
40
60
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
p = 0.01 %
Tsettle = 0.55 s
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Improved design: choose fz = fphy,increase fc by increasing Gcm further
25
(m/s)N 100000cmG
mHz 48.0 phyz ff
sGsG z
cmc1)(
sMGsT vcm /)(
Hz 11 21
v
cmc M
Gf
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Step vref response
26
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30
Spe
ed [m
ph]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
20
40
60
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
p = 0.2 %
Tsettle = 0.47 s
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
What is the effect of increasing fz?
27
(m/s)N 10000cmG
sGsG z
cmc1)(
sMGsT vcm /)(
Hz 1.1 21
v
cmc M
Gf
Hz 048.0100 phyz ff
o87.4 m
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Step vref response
28
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30S
peed
[mph
]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-5000
0
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-50
0
50
100
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
p = 1.82 %
Tsettle = 0.50 s
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Integrator wind‐up
29
actualspeed [m/s]
referencespeed [m/s]
Driver is given PI dynamics to control vehicle speed to a given reference.Output control value is the force command given to the vehicle drive system via gas/break pedals
Vehicle Controller Model
1Fvcommand
Max Force
Command1s
Integrator
Gcm
wz
2vref
1v
Fcommand
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Preventing integrator wind‐up
30
Stop integration if required gas pedal exceeds maximum available
actualspeed [m/s]
referencespeed [m/s]
Driver is given PI dynamics to control vehicle speed to a given reference.Output control value is the force command given to the vehicle drive system via gas/break pedals
Vehicle Controller Model
1Fvcommand
Product
Max Force
Command1s
Integrator
Gcm
wz
|u|
2vref
1v
Fcommand
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Step vref response
31
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30S
peed
[mph
]
Reference SpeedEV Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
5000
10000
Forc
e [N
]
Drive ForceResistive Force
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
20
40
60
Trac
tive
Pow
er [k
W]
time [sec]
p = 0.2 %
Tsettle = 0.55 s
CU‐Boulder ECEN5017, USU ECE 6930
Response to change in grade of road
32
Gphy(s)fv(s)
v(s)GEV(s)Gc(s)+–vref(s)fvc(s)
System small‐signal model:
Vehicle controller