ISER-UAA Workshop on Strengthening Institutions: Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine...
44
The potential and pitfalls of coastal and marine spatial planning as a framework for cooperative management in the Arctic ISER-UAA Workshop on Strengthening Institutions: Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment of the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas Anchorage, 3 rd March, 2011 Ian M. Dutton [email protected]
ISER-UAA Workshop on Strengthening Institutions: Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment of the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas Anchorage,
ISER-UAA Workshop on Strengthening Institutions: Strategies for
Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment of the Beaufort
and Chukchi Seas Anchorage, 3 rd March, 2011 Ian M. Dutton
[email protected]
Slide 2
Overview Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP) Global
status General potential and pitfalls Four key questions for CMSP
in the Arctic Summing Up can CMSP make a useful contribution to
collaborative management in the Arctic?
Slide 3
LOTS of global guidance
Slide 4
State of the art
http://www.unesco-ioc-marinesp.be/msp_around_the_world?
Slide 5
What is CMSP? Marine spatial planning is a public process of
analyzing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of
human activities in marine areas to achieve ecological, economic,
and social objectives that usually have been specified through a
political process. http://www.unesco-ioc-marinesp.be/
Slide 6
National CMSP Framework CMSP = comprehensive, adaptive,
integrated, ecosystem-based, and transparent spatial planning
process, based on sound science, for analyzing current and
anticipated uses of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes areas. "coastal
and marine spatial plans" means the plans that are certified by the
National Ocean Council as developed in accordance with the
definition, goals, principles, and process described in the Final
Recommendations.
Slide 7
Demand for Ocean Space in Belgium
Slide 8
Already exists in US Ocean Use Regulation (typically single
sector)
Slide 9
Potential of CMSP Establish common vision for future
Coordination of decision making Regulation of use(s)/zoning
Separation of conflict(s) Clarify regulatory authority Defense and
national security Allocate resources to best uses Formalize EBM
& protect ecosystem services/features Protect property, legal,
economic and cultural rights Create certainty for investment
Promotes transparency and public engagement etc. Jervis Bay and
watershed (Dutton,et al. 1994)
Slide 10
Enables vision for future, transparency, promotes inclusiveness
in decision making both laterally and vertically and
establishes/protects rights
Slide 11
Provides reason and inclusive process to bring stakeholders
together South African example National Environmental Management:
Integrated Coastal Management Act (No. 24 of 2008)
Slide 12
Clarifying authority, separating conflicts, protecting key
assets and simplifying permitting China Territorial Sea, 2002
Norway Oil Regulation, 2008
http://www.unesco-ioc-marinesp.be/msp_around_the_world
Slide 13
Separates conflicts, optimizes resources, promotes investment
confidence, minimizes development impacts, empowers user inquiry,
etc. CA Ocean Uses Atlas project -
http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/news/weeklynews/nov10/ca-ocean-uses.html
Slide 14
MA Whale Strike Avoidance
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111668099
Smart sea use reducing conflicts, sharing space to protect key
ecological resources and industries
Slide 15
So why didnt MSP catch on before? Traditionally planned from
the land outwards first land use planning, the coastal zone, now
sea? Variable intensity of sea uses around the world Lack of
compelling drivers e.g. offshore mining, crises Fisheries, the most
extensive global sea use, has its own spatial, temporal and
rule-based management approaches - why add more? More land and sea
use restrictions had limited political appeal Lack of multiple
use/broader ocean governance frameworks; things working ok for now
why change? Lack of champions who speaks for the oceans and who
listens? Lack of data, planning /science methods and lack of
spatial data processing ability to compile and analyze data in ways
comparable to terrestrial systems
Slide 16
Common Pitfalls of CMSP Process too complex Panacea for all
issues? Too ambitious too quickly Often top down Lack of
stakeholder empowerment - e.g. tools require specialists Over
reliance on scientific data technical capacity exceeds adoption
capacity Inadequate impact monitoring Lack of coupling with
implementation
Slide 17
Many factors shape ecosystem and governance trajectories CMSP
alone cannot address these
Slide 18
1. Can CMSP work in a complex governance situations at
Chukchi/Beaufort Sea scales?
Slide 19
GBRMP Act 1975 10 year initial zoning process 350,000 km2
National and State governments coordinated Mining and oil drilling
banned