56
Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems Chapter 12

Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems. Chapter 12. Job-Order Cost Systems. Process Costing. Job-Order Costing. Product costs are traced to individual inventory items. Products are manufactured to order. Cost records must be maintained for each distinct product or job. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Chapter 12

Page 2: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-2

Job-Order Cost Systems

Job-OrderCosting

ProcessCosting

Product costs are traced to individual inventory items.

Products are manufactured to order.

Cost records must be maintained for each distinct product or job.

Page 3: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-3

Typical job-order cost applications: Special-order printing Building construction

Also used in service industry Hospitals Law firms

Job-OrderCosting

ProcessCosting

Job-Order Cost Systems

Page 4: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-4

Job-OrderCosting

ProcessCosting

Used for production of small, identical, low cost items.

Costs cannot be directly traced to each unit of product.

Costs are evenly distributed across total production by dividing total product cost by the number of units produced.

Process Cost Systems

Page 5: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-5

Typical process cost applications:

Petrochemical refinery

Paint manufacturer

Paper mill

Job-OrderCosting

ProcessCosting

Process Cost Systems

Page 6: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-6

Hybrid Costing

Hybrid costing employs some aspectsof both job-order and process costing.

Hybrid costing employs some aspectsof both job-order and process costing.

Job-order Hybrid Costing Process Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing

Labour and overhead costs assigned to

batches as in process costing.

Material Costs Chargedto batches as in

job-order costing.

Page 7: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-7

Receive orders from customers

Schedulejobs

Ordermaterials

Begin production

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 8: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-8

Job-Order Cost Flow

THE JOB

Directmaterial

Direct labour

Traced directly to each job

Traced directly

to each job

Manufacturingoverhead (OH)

Applied to eachjob using a

predeterminedrate

Page 9: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-9

Manufacturing Overhead

Manufacturing Overhead

Job No. 1Job No. 1

Job No. 2Job No. 2

Job No. 3Job No. 3

Charge direct

material and direct

labour costs to

each job as work is

performed.

Charge direct

material and direct

labour costs to

each job as work is

performed.

Direct MaterialsDirect Materials

Direct LabourDirect Labour

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 10: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-10

Apply overhead to

each job using a

predeter-mined rate.

Apply overhead to

each job using a

predeter-mined rate.

Direct MaterialsDirect Materials

Direct LabourDirect Labour

Job No. 1Job No. 1

Job No. 2Job No. 2

Job No. 3Job No. 3Manufacturing Overhead

Manufacturing Overhead

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 11: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-11

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

The primary document for

tracking the costs associated with a

given job is the job cost sheet.

Let’s investigate

Page 12: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-12

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 13: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-13

Let’s see one

A materials requisition form is used to

authorize the use of materials on a job.

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 14: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-14

Will E. Delite

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 15: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-15

Will E. Delite

Type, quantity, and total cost of material charged to job A-143.

Cost of material is charged to job A-143.

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 16: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-16

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 17: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-17

Workers use time tickets to record the time spent on each

job.

Let’s see one

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 18: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-18

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 19: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-19

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 20: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-20

Apply manufacturing overhead to jobs using a predetermined overhead rate of $4 per direct

labour hour (DLH).Let’s do it

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 21: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-21

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 22: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-22

Let’s summarize the document flow we have

been discussing in a job-order

costing system.

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 23: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-23

Job Cost Sheets

MaterialsRequisition

Direct materials

Indirect materials

Manufacturing Overhead Account

Materials usedmay be either

direct orindirect.

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 24: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-24

Job Cost Sheets

Employee Time Ticket

Manufacturing Overhead Account

Direct Labour

Indirect Labour

An employee’stime may be eitherdirect or indirect.

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 25: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-25

EmployeeTime Ticket

Job Cost Sheets

MaterialsRequisition

OtherActual OHCharges

IndirectMaterial

IndirectLabour

AppliedOverhead

Manufacturing Overhead Account

Documentation in a Job-OrderCost System

Page 26: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-26

Let’s return to WoodCo and see what we will do if

actual and applied overhead

are not equal.

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 27: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-27

WoodCo’s actual overhead for the year was$650,000 for a total of 170,000 direct labour hours.

How much total overhead was applied toWoodCo’s jobs during the year? Use

WoodCo’s predetermined overhead rateof $4.00 per direct labour hour.

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 28: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-28

SOLUTIONApplied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labour Hours

Applied Overhead = $4.00 per DLH × 170,000 DLH = $680,000

WoodCo’s actual overhead for the year was$650,000 for a total of 170,000 direct labour hours.

How much total overhead was applied toWoodCo’s jobs during the year? Use

WoodCo’s predetermined overhead rateof $4.00 per direct labour hour.

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 29: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-29

WoodCo’s actual overhead for the year was$650,000 for a total of 170,000 direct labour hours.

How much total overhead was applied toWoodCo’s jobs during the year? Use

WoodCo’s predetermined overhead rateof $4.00 per direct labour hour.

SOLUTIONApplied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labour Hours

Applied Overhead = $4.00 per DLH × 170,000 DLH = $680,000

WoodCo has overappliedoverhead for the yearby $30,000. What will

WoodCo do?

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 30: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-30

Work inProcess

FinishedGoods

Cost of Goods Sold

$30,000may be allocated

to these accounts.

$30,000 may beclosed directly to

cost of goods sold.

Cost of Goods Sold

WoodCo’s Method

OR

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 31: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-31

WoodCo’sMfg. Overhead

Actualoverhead

costs

$650,000$30,000

overapplied

WoodCo’s Costof Goods Sold

Unadjusted Balance

$30,000

$30,000

AdjustedBalance

OverheadAppliedto jobs

$680,000

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 32: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-32

Alternative 1 Alternative 2If Manufacturing Close to Cost Overhead is . . . of Goods Sold Allocation

UNDERAPPLIED INCREASE INCREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process

(Applied OH is less Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold

OVERAPPLIED DECREASE DECREASECost of Goods Sold Work in Process

(Applied OH is greater Finished Goodsthan actual OH) Cost of Goods Sold

WoodCo’s Method

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 33: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-33

Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 34: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-34

Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is

a. $50,000 overapplied.

b. $50,000 underapplied.

c. $60,000 overapplied.

d. $60,000 underapplied.

Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000

Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 35: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-35

Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000.

a. True

b. False

Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000.

a. True

b. False

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 36: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-36

Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000.

a. True

b. False

Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000.

a. True

b. FalseIf overhead is underapplied, cost of

goods sold is understated. The adjustment will increase cost of

goods sold.

Job-Order Cost Flow

Page 37: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-37

Let’s turn our attention to

process cost systems.

Process Costing

Page 38: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-38

Job-order costing Costs accumulated by

the job.

Work in process has a job-cost sheet for each job.

Many unique, high cost jobs.

Jobs built to customer order.

Process costing Costs accumulated by

department or process.

Work in process has a production report for each batch of products.

A few identical, low cost products.

Units continuously produced for inventory.

Comparison of Job-Order Costing and Process Costing

Page 39: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-39

Direct Material

FinishedGoods

Cost of GoodsSold

Direct Labour

ManufacturingOverhead

Jobs

The work-in-process account consists of individual jobs in a

job-order cost system.

Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing

Page 40: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-40

Direct Material

FinishedGoods

Cost of GoodsSold

Direct Labour

ManufacturingOverhead

Products

Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing

The work-in-process account consists of

batches of products in a process cost system.

Page 41: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-41

Equivalent Units: A Key Concept

Costs are accumulated for a period of time for products in work-in-process inventory.

Products in work-in-process inventory at the beginning and end of the period are only partially complete.

Equivalent units is a concept expressing these partially completed products as a smaller number of fully completed products.

Page 42: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-42

Two one-half completed products are equivalent to one completed product.

+ =

So, 10,000 units 70 percent completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

So, 10,000 units 70 percent completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

Equivalent Units: A Key Concept

Page 43: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-43

For the current period, Jones started15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

Equivalent Units

Page 44: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-44

For the current period, Jones started15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

10,000 units + (5,000 units × .30) = 11,500 equivalent units

10,000 units + (5,000 units × .30) = 11,500 equivalent units

Equivalent Units

Page 45: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-45

Calculating and Using Equivalent Units of Production

To calculate the cost perequivalent unit for the period:

Cost perequivalent

unit

= Costs for the period

Equivalent units for the period

Page 46: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-46

If Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the 11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per equivalent unit for the period?

a. $1.84

b. $2.40

c. $2.76

d. $2.90

Equivalent Units

Page 47: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-47

If Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the 11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per equivalent unit for the period?

a. $1.84

b. $2.40

c. $2.76

d. $2.90

$27,600 ÷ 11,500 equivalent units

= $2.40 per equivalent unit

$27,600 ÷ 11,500 equivalent units

= $2.40 per equivalent unit

Equivalent Units

Page 48: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-48

Cost of Production Report

Cost of Production

Report

Determination of cost per

equivalent unit.

Allocation of total cost to goods

transferred and ending WIP inventory.

Computation of equivalent units.

Page 49: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-49

Equivalent Units of Production –Weighted-Average Method

The weighted-average method . . .Makes no distinction between work done in the

prior period and work done in the current period.Blends together units and costs from the prior

period and the current period.

The FIFO method is a morecomplex method and israrely used in practice.

Page 50: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-50

At this point, we need to look at an example

to illustrate the departmental cost of

production report.

Cost of Production Report

Page 51: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-51

Process Costing Illustrated

TigerCo makes toy tigers in three departments, Cutting, Stitching, and Stuffing.

TigerCo uses the weighted-average cost procedure.

Using the following information for the month of March, let’s prepare a cost of production report for the Cutting Department.

Page 52: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-52

Work in Process, March 1: 20,000 units, 30% complete.Cost of March 1 Work in Process: $22,000

Units started into production in April: 30,000 unitsUnits completed and transferred out in April 40,000 units

Work in process, March 31: 10,000 units, 40% complete

Costs incurred during MarchMaterials $ 88,000Labour 44,000Overhead 132,000

Process Costing Illustrated

TigerCo March Cutting Department Information

Page 53: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-53

Process Costing Illustrated

Actual Equivalent % Complete Units in Beginning Inventory 20,000 30% Units Started in March 30,000 Total 50,000

Units Transferred to Stitching 40,000 40,000 100% Units in Ending Inventory 10,000 4,000 40% Total 50,000 44,000

Beginning inventory % is not used in weighted-average method.

40% of 10,000 units

Computation of Equivalent Units for March

Page 54: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-54

Production Report Example

Costs in Beginning Inventory 22,000$ Costs Added in March: Materials 88,000 Labour 44,000 Overhead 132,000 Total 286,000$ Divide by March Equivalent Units ÷ 44,000 Cost per Equivalent Unit 6.50$

Determination of Cost per Equivalent Unit for March.

Page 55: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-55

Production Report Example

Costs Transferred to Stitching: 40,000 units × $6.50 per unit 260,000$ Costs Remaining in Cutting Inventory: 4,000 units × $6.50 per unit 26,000 Total 286,000$

All costs accounted for

Allocation of Costs

Page 56: Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems

Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada12-56

I’m ready to processsome leisure time.

End of Chapter 12