12
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 1/12 4/1/0 1 Seawater Intrusion & Submarine Groundwater Discharge Today – Submarine Groundwater Discharge Seawater Intrusion 2 Historic observations 3,000 years ago, off Ruad, Syria, the Phoenicians had built a submarine GW collection system that supplied fresh water to the City of Amrit. Now proposed off Jeddah: Time to Tap Submarine Fresh Water Springs by Essam Al-Ghalib A rab News July 11, 2004 Project SubGATE CH 4 cit.: L. Sonrel (1868) Le Fond de la Mer Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

L6 Salt Water Intrusion

  • Upload
    nelbru

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 1/12

4/1/0

1

Seawater Intrusion &Submarine Groundwater Discharge

• Today

– SubmarineGroundwater Discharge

– Seawater Intrusion

2

Historic observations

3,000 years ago, off Ruad, Syria, the Phoenicians had built a submarine GWcollection system that supplied fresh water to the City of Amrit.

Now proposed off Jeddah: Time to Tap Submarine Fresh Water Springs by EssamAl-Ghalib Arab News July 11, 2004

Project SubGATE

CH 4

cit.: L. Sonrel (1868) Le Fond de la Mer

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

Page 2: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 2/12

4/1/0

3

Pliny, the Elder:… from “Natural History,” written prior to 79 A.D.

“... Black Sea : ~37 miles fromland… springs of fresh waterbubbling out as if from pipes onthe seashore...”

“In fact fresh water may bedrawn from the sea in a great

many places, as at the SwallowIslands and at Aradus [ Syria ]and in the Gulf of Cadiz[Spain].”

More observations …

NYMPHEA WATER

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

4

Submarine Groundwater Discharge

Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) =any flow out across the seabed of the continental shelf,regardless of composition or driving force.So, SGD is not defined solely on basis of components, origin, or driving forces.

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

SGD is a ubiquitous, often distributed discharge source along the coastline.

In some areas, such as karst and fractured areas , it becomes a focuseddischarge, often with high discharge rates.

Great Bay Estuary, NH

ciceet.unh.eduLake Superior

Thermal images

http://www.fws.gov/midwest/greatlakes/Groundwater.htm

Page 3: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 3/12

4/1/0

5

SGD components

6

Example: Biscayne Aquifer

(SZ,

2003)

Highly permeable limestone and less-permeable sandstone and sand.

http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/ch_g/G-text4.html

Page 4: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 4/12

4/1/0

7

SGD scales – karst systems27 miles off Jacksonville,FLJOIDES test hole

Fresh water head ~5 mabove sea level

F. Manheim

Reduced GW discharged intooxic Tampa Bay, FL water:

Role for microbially- mediatedredox processes in SGD

(Swarzenski et al., 2004)

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

8

Processes driving SGD

• Terrestrial – hydraulic gradient

• Marine – tidal pumping, wave set-up, current-induced topographic flow, convection (e.g., saltfingering), sea-level differences (e.g., acrossbarrier islands)

Page 5: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 5/12

4/1/0

9

Example: water level differencesacross a barrier island

Difference in water levels sets up hydraulicgradient that results in subsurface flow

10

Global Freshwater SGD estimates

Milliman (pers. comm .)1,000-3,000

Zekster (2000)2,400

Berner & Berner ’872,200

COSOD II (1987)100

ReferenceDischarge*(km3/y)

*estimates for fresh water; river discharge = 35,000-40,000 km 3 /y (< 16%)

SGD variable in time & space !!

SGD high in areas with: high rainfall, high relief,fractured rock, poorly developed river systems, karst

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

Page 6: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 6/12

4/1/0

11

SourceInputs

10 13 moles/y

Reference

Rivers 1.2-1.5 Meybeck (1979)Berner and Berner (1987)Morse & Mackenzie (1990)Milliman (1993)

Hydrothermalactivity

0.2-0.3 Wolery and Sleep (1988)

Aeolian inputs 0.005 Milliman (1993)Groundwater 0.5 COSOD II (1987)Groundwater 0.5-1.6 Milliman (1993)

Contribution toGlobal Ocean Ca 2

+ Budget

>30% river input!(Burnett, 2004)

Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS

12

What happens when people interfere with the

freshwater discharge to the sea?

Let’s focus on the phreatic aquifer

Then, we replace the mixing zone between

freshwater and saltwater, where transversedispersion is very important, with the

assumption of an immiscible interface.

(Fitts, 2002)

Underlying the freshwater discharge isa so-called “salt water wedge.”

Page 7: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 7/12

4/1/0

13

Simple sharp-interface conceptual model

Q’ = freshwater discharge to sea [L 2/T] z + h f = thickness of freshwater

h f = water table elevation (above MSL) b + h f = thickness of freshwater b = depth to bottom of aqufier above wedge “toe”

z = depth to interface (below MSL) L = length of “sea water intrusion”

for a phreatic aquifer

z z

h f

bQ’

L

toe wedge saltwater

freshwater sea

MSL

x

14

Simple sharp-interface conceptual model

f f f s

f f f s

f f s

h z z

g h g z g z

h z z

! ! !

! ! !

" "

+=

+=

+=

f

f s

f

h z ! !

!

"=

026.1,0.1 22 cm g

cm g

s f == ! !

for a phreatic aquifer

Assume hydrostatics in saltwater and essentially horizontalflow in freshwater. On the sharp interface p s = p f

Assume steady flow and sharp interface.

( ) f f f

s s

h z p

z p

+=

=

!

!

Ghyben-Herzberg Equation

f f f hhh z 40380.1026.1

0.1!=

"

=

equate

Solve for depth to interface:

Typically:

If you observe and map h f you can infer z . If you also

map the bottom of theaquifer you can infer thelocation of the toe.

Page 8: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 8/12

4/1/0

15

z z

h f

bQ’

L

toe wedge saltwater

freshwater sea

MSL

x

dx

dh K

dx

dh Kh

dx

dh Kh

dx

dhh z K Q

f

f s

s

f

f s

s f

f

f s

f f

f f

2

)(2

)(

)1(

)('

! !

!

! !

!

! !

!

""

=

""=

+"

"=

+"=

22

2

2

2

,0

2

2

,0

2

2

,0

22

2

'2'2

iprelationshGHfrom

0,atsince'2

'2

'2

bQ

K b

Q K

L

bh

h L x K

LQh

hhconst h K

xQ

dhdx K Q

f

f s

f

s

f

f s

f s

s

f

f s

toe x f

f s

f s

toe x f

f toe x f f s

f s

f s

f s

!

! !

!

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

! !

!

! !

!

! !

!

! !

"=

##$

%&&'

( ""

=

##$

%&&'

( "=

=="

=

"=+"="

"="

=

=

=

Simple sharp-interface conceptual model

f

f s

f h z ! !

!

"= bh

f

f s

toe x f !

! ! "=

= ,0

for a phreatic aquifer

Ghyben-Herzberg Equation:

For our simple model, to find intrusion length, L, solvethe flow problem:

At the toe: x= 0, z=b.

16

for a confined aquifer of thickness b, & top at depth d .

Simple sharp-interface conceptual model

Q’ = freshwater discharge to sea [L 2/T] z - d = thickness of freshwater h f = freshwater head (above MSL) b = aquifer thickness = thickness of d = depth to top of the aquifer freshwater above wedge “toe”

z = depth to interface (below MSL) L = length of “sea water intrusion”

z z

h f

bQ’

L

toe wedge saltwater

freshwater sea

MSL

x

d

Potentiometric surface

Confining Bed

Page 9: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 9/12

Page 10: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 10/12

4/1/0

1

19

Simple sharp-interface conceptual models

2'

Aquifer Phreatic2 Kb

LQ f

f s

f

s

!

! !

!

! "=

2'

:Aquifer Confined2 Kb

LQ f

f s

!

! ! "=

Notes:

Intrusion increases with- higher K

- lower Q’ - greater density difference

- greater aquifier thickness

Some Implications:

Intrusion increases - during drought - with reduced recharge

caused by water diversion - because of pumping

Intrusion decreases with - artificial recharge

Coastal Aquifer

20

Island or Pennesula

(Schwartz and Zhang,2003)

Net Recharge

Page 11: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 11/12

Page 12: L6 Salt Water Intrusion

8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 12/12

4/1/0

23http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/ch_g/G-text4.html

Control of Seawater Intrusionin the Biscayne Aquifer, Florida