Upload
nelbru
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 1/12
4/1/0
1
Seawater Intrusion &Submarine Groundwater Discharge
• Today
– SubmarineGroundwater Discharge
– Seawater Intrusion
2
Historic observations
3,000 years ago, off Ruad, Syria, the Phoenicians had built a submarine GWcollection system that supplied fresh water to the City of Amrit.
Now proposed off Jeddah: Time to Tap Submarine Fresh Water Springs by EssamAl-Ghalib Arab News July 11, 2004
Project SubGATE
CH 4
cit.: L. Sonrel (1868) Le Fond de la Mer
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 2/12
4/1/0
3
Pliny, the Elder:… from “Natural History,” written prior to 79 A.D.
“... Black Sea : ~37 miles fromland… springs of fresh waterbubbling out as if from pipes onthe seashore...”
“In fact fresh water may bedrawn from the sea in a great
many places, as at the SwallowIslands and at Aradus [ Syria ]and in the Gulf of Cadiz[Spain].”
More observations …
NYMPHEA WATER
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
4
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) =any flow out across the seabed of the continental shelf,regardless of composition or driving force.So, SGD is not defined solely on basis of components, origin, or driving forces.
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
SGD is a ubiquitous, often distributed discharge source along the coastline.
In some areas, such as karst and fractured areas , it becomes a focuseddischarge, often with high discharge rates.
Great Bay Estuary, NH
ciceet.unh.eduLake Superior
Thermal images
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/greatlakes/Groundwater.htm
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 3/12
4/1/0
5
SGD components
6
Example: Biscayne Aquifer
(SZ,
2003)
Highly permeable limestone and less-permeable sandstone and sand.
http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/ch_g/G-text4.html
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 4/12
4/1/0
7
SGD scales – karst systems27 miles off Jacksonville,FLJOIDES test hole
Fresh water head ~5 mabove sea level
F. Manheim
Reduced GW discharged intooxic Tampa Bay, FL water:
Role for microbially- mediatedredox processes in SGD
(Swarzenski et al., 2004)
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
8
Processes driving SGD
• Terrestrial – hydraulic gradient
• Marine – tidal pumping, wave set-up, current-induced topographic flow, convection (e.g., saltfingering), sea-level differences (e.g., acrossbarrier islands)
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 5/12
4/1/0
9
Example: water level differencesacross a barrier island
Difference in water levels sets up hydraulicgradient that results in subsurface flow
10
Global Freshwater SGD estimates
Milliman (pers. comm .)1,000-3,000
Zekster (2000)2,400
Berner & Berner ’872,200
COSOD II (1987)100
ReferenceDischarge*(km3/y)
*estimates for fresh water; river discharge = 35,000-40,000 km 3 /y (< 16%)
SGD variable in time & space !!
SGD high in areas with: high rainfall, high relief,fractured rock, poorly developed river systems, karst
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 6/12
4/1/0
11
SourceInputs
10 13 moles/y
Reference
Rivers 1.2-1.5 Meybeck (1979)Berner and Berner (1987)Morse & Mackenzie (1990)Milliman (1993)
Hydrothermalactivity
0.2-0.3 Wolery and Sleep (1988)
Aeolian inputs 0.005 Milliman (1993)Groundwater 0.5 COSOD II (1987)Groundwater 0.5-1.6 Milliman (1993)
Contribution toGlobal Ocean Ca 2
+ Budget
>30% river input!(Burnett, 2004)
Courtesy of P. Swarzenski and W. Burnett, USGS
12
What happens when people interfere with the
freshwater discharge to the sea?
Let’s focus on the phreatic aquifer
Then, we replace the mixing zone between
freshwater and saltwater, where transversedispersion is very important, with the
assumption of an immiscible interface.
(Fitts, 2002)
Underlying the freshwater discharge isa so-called “salt water wedge.”
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 7/12
4/1/0
13
Simple sharp-interface conceptual model
Q’ = freshwater discharge to sea [L 2/T] z + h f = thickness of freshwater
h f = water table elevation (above MSL) b + h f = thickness of freshwater b = depth to bottom of aqufier above wedge “toe”
z = depth to interface (below MSL) L = length of “sea water intrusion”
for a phreatic aquifer
z z
h f
bQ’
L
toe wedge saltwater
freshwater sea
MSL
x
14
Simple sharp-interface conceptual model
f f f s
f f f s
f f s
h z z
g h g z g z
h z z
! ! !
! ! !
" "
+=
+=
+=
f
f s
f
h z ! !
!
"=
026.1,0.1 22 cm g
cm g
s f == ! !
for a phreatic aquifer
Assume hydrostatics in saltwater and essentially horizontalflow in freshwater. On the sharp interface p s = p f
Assume steady flow and sharp interface.
( ) f f f
s s
h z p
z p
+=
=
!
!
Ghyben-Herzberg Equation
f f f hhh z 40380.1026.1
0.1!=
"
=
equate
Solve for depth to interface:
Typically:
If you observe and map h f you can infer z . If you also
map the bottom of theaquifer you can infer thelocation of the toe.
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 8/12
4/1/0
15
z z
h f
bQ’
L
toe wedge saltwater
freshwater sea
MSL
x
dx
dh K
dx
dh Kh
dx
dh Kh
dx
dhh z K Q
f
f s
s
f
f s
s f
f
f s
f f
f f
2
)(2
)(
)1(
)('
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
""
=
""=
+"
"=
+"=
22
2
2
2
,0
2
2
,0
2
2
,0
22
2
'2'2
iprelationshGHfrom
0,atsince'2
'2
'2
bQ
K b
Q K
L
bh
h L x K
LQh
hhconst h K
xQ
dhdx K Q
f
f s
f
s
f
f s
f s
s
f
f s
toe x f
f s
f s
toe x f
f toe x f f s
f s
f s
f s
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
"=
##$
%&&'
( ""
=
##$
%&&'
( "=
=="
=
"=+"="
"="
=
=
=
Simple sharp-interface conceptual model
f
f s
f h z ! !
!
"= bh
f
f s
toe x f !
! ! "=
= ,0
for a phreatic aquifer
Ghyben-Herzberg Equation:
For our simple model, to find intrusion length, L, solvethe flow problem:
At the toe: x= 0, z=b.
16
for a confined aquifer of thickness b, & top at depth d .
Simple sharp-interface conceptual model
Q’ = freshwater discharge to sea [L 2/T] z - d = thickness of freshwater h f = freshwater head (above MSL) b = aquifer thickness = thickness of d = depth to top of the aquifer freshwater above wedge “toe”
z = depth to interface (below MSL) L = length of “sea water intrusion”
z z
h f
bQ’
L
toe wedge saltwater
freshwater sea
MSL
x
d
Potentiometric surface
Confining Bed
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 9/12
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 10/12
4/1/0
1
19
Simple sharp-interface conceptual models
2'
Aquifer Phreatic2 Kb
LQ f
f s
f
s
!
! !
!
! "=
2'
:Aquifer Confined2 Kb
LQ f
f s
!
! ! "=
Notes:
Intrusion increases with- higher K
- lower Q’ - greater density difference
- greater aquifier thickness
Some Implications:
Intrusion increases - during drought - with reduced recharge
caused by water diversion - because of pumping
Intrusion decreases with - artificial recharge
Coastal Aquifer
20
Island or Pennesula
(Schwartz and Zhang,2003)
Net Recharge
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 11/12
8/12/2019 L6 Salt Water Intrusion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/l6-salt-water-intrusion 12/12
4/1/0
23http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/ch_g/G-text4.html
Control of Seawater Intrusionin the Biscayne Aquifer, Florida