Upload
richard-fields
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Leading Collaboration
20.04.2006
S-72.3510 Product Development of Telecommunication Systems
Jari Ylitalo
Helsinki University of Technology
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
2
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Intro – the Lecturer
Jari Ylitalo, Lic.Sc. (Tech.) Researcher at DIEM/HCL Group Research interests
– Leadership, leader development, leadership development, collaboration (social interaction point of view)
– Means, methods, processes and roles of leader/leadership and collaboration development
– Qualitative research, action research
3
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Intro – the Lecture
The aim of the lecture is to highlight basics of collaborative dynamics and how to lead collaboration
The findings from a recent research project will be presented (Leading Collaboration in Networked Business - LediCo)
Point of view is generic rather than telecom specific
4
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
”Why should we consider themes of leadership and collaboration in product
development (or in general)?”
5
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Functional Organization
CEO
Planning
ProductionAccounting Sales Marketing R&D Quality HR
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 3
District 1
District 2
District 3
Administration
Development
Plant 4
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Auditing
Development
Product 1
Product 2
Sevices
6
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Networked Organization
Company B
Customer 1
Company A
Customer 2
Company C
Company D
Company E
Project 1
Project 2
Customers of the customer
Customers of the customer
Partnership 1
Partnership 2
7
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Background of the LediCo project Successful partnership relationships require
– mutual trust and respect, open communication, long term commitment, capability to resolve conflicts, and willingness to learn together
Collaborative relations are demanding social settings – require often a new kind of mindset and organizational
practices from all collaborative parties We still lack practical and theoretical knowledge
– how to lead, develop and maintain collaborative business relationships
8
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
To collaborate – the definition
“To collaborate” is “to labor together” In the Merriam-Webster dictionary it is defined as “to
work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor”
9
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Reasons behind collaboration
An individual organization may try to acquire new knowledge and seek novel learning opportunities through interorganizational collaboration
Three main drivers for interorganizational collaboration: – reducing transaction costs
– new positioning in markets
– access new knowledge and capabilities.
A collaborative relationship is considered by many authors to be the best vehicle for gaining competitive advantage and improving strategic positioning
10
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Collaborative relations - diverse realities Collaborative operations have expanded closer to the
organizations’ elementary operations, e.g. R&D, new product development (NPD), and marketing
Relationships vary in length, intensity, formality, objectives, the content of collaboration, the number of partners, management structures, and administrative models
Various collaborative arrangements exist, e.g. networks, alliances, partnerships, and joint ventures
11
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
LediCo research approach and methods Inductive and explorative case study research with four
cases Two-year project, 2004-2005 The data through documents, interviews, surveys, and
workshops Case companies got specific feedback Findings were generalized at the project level Reporting through conference papers, reports and thesis
12
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Cases
A) A large scale IT outsourcing partnership
B) A common information service portal with multiple partners (18)
C) A cross cultural product development partnerhship
D) A complex demand-supply chain dyad
13
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Collaboration Frameworks
14
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Collaborative Relationship Dimensions
Business outcomes
Added value
Relationshipoutcomes
Trust
Shared meanings
Competencies
Collaboration
Mutual review
Preconditions for a collaborative relationshipInitial match
Top management’s commitment
Interaction & Communication
Knowledge Processing
Learning & Transformation
PurposeCommon
strategic intent
ObjectivesBusiness &Relationship
Infrastructure
Management
Technology
Contracts
Processes
15
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Life Cycle of a Collaborative Relationship
Dissolution
1. Pre-stage
2. Exploration– decision
3. Formation– structure & contract
4. Development & Learning– building shared meanings
and trust
5. Maturity – continuous improvement &
value creation
Re-formation
16
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Life Cycle of a Collaborative Relationship
Pre-stage and exploratory stage – the need for collaborative relationship is clarified
and the partner is sought Formation stage
– the objectives are defined and the platform for collaboration is set up
Learning and development stage – collaboration is developed through mutual transformation processes
Maturity stage – continuous development of collaboration takes place
Reformation or dissolution– through a crisis the partnership can lead to dissolution of the relationship
The Life Cycle Model emphasises the dynamic nature of a partnership– stages are somewhat overlapping and have not always clear boundaries
Dissolution
1. Pre-stage
2. Exploration– decision
3. Formation– structure & contract
4. Development & Learning– building shared meanings
and trust
5. Maturity – continuous improvement &
value creation
Re-formation
17
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Potential Surprises and Underestimations Diversity is greater than expected It takes longer time to build a collaborative
relationship than anticipated Mutual learning and adjustments are continuosly
needed Individuals and their relationships are decisive in
successful collaboration It is not just the interface that matters
18
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Mutual Considerations
Why are we doing this? What kind of frame are we using?Roles and responsibilities needed?Mindsets and competencies needed?What kind of mutual actions are needed?Success criteria and evaluation?
19
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Tasks of leadership... Ensuring mutual awareness (and existence) of mission/common
purpose of the partnership Ensuring direction for actions, vision and goals of the partnership Creating preconditions for action and success
– Information, knowledge, competences and skills, equipment, empowerment, psychological space, physical conditions and facilities for collaboration
– Creation and maintenance of relevant collaborative connections and relationships between people, teams and organizations internally and externally
– Decision making, conflict resolution, Ensuring feedback and criteria for success of collaboration
– business outcomes, relationship characteristics
20
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
... Tasks of leadership
Making sure that people know their primary tasks and focus their actions and energy towards those – taking care of task, time and role boundaries
Taking care that the partnership can meet internal and external requirements all the time – Continuous transformation and improvement– Maintaining vitality
Meeting emotional energy and channelling it to promote the primary task of the partnership
21
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Conclusions Meeting collaboration challenges concern every
organization (and individual?) Horizontal, one-to-one relationships are in core of a
collaborative relationship Building and nurturing a living relationship require
mutual sense making and dialogue Collaboration competencies and mindset should be
strengthened consciously Continuous matching together needed
22
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
It takes yearsto build the relationship
-However it can be destroyed
in seconds!
(A LediCo case company representative)
23
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Discussion
Have a discussion with the person next to you– What would I expect from my collaboration partner?
– What are special requirements (competences/mindsets) for an individual in a collaborative role?
24
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and ManagementJari Ylitalo
S-72.3510Product Development of Telecommunication SystemsLeading Collaboration 200406
Contact Information
Jari YlitaloHelsinki University of Technology
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management tel. +358 50 301 6841
e-mail: [email protected]
Internet: www.hcl.hut.fi