Upload
dominick-fox
View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lynx-Hare Cycle Assumptions• N1 and N2 dependent only on
each other• predator can find and consume
prey at any prey density
• no Allee effect for predator or prey at low densities
Refugium may exist: place for prey to survive without presence of predator
e.g., prickly pear cactus introduced to Australia In 1830s for hedge rows, gardens
Also resisted drought and had no predators, so spread rapidly and became a nuisance species
Cactus moth introduced in 1926, quickly spread and helped control cactus
Cactus still present in refugia andexpand from them until moth population resurges
Response of predatory birds to different densities of the brown lemming near Barrow, Alaska
1951 1952 1953
Brown lemming 1 to 5 15 to 20 70 to 80 (ind per acre) Pomarine jaeger Uncommon, no Breeding pairs 4 Mi2 Breeding pairs
breeding 18 Mi2 Snowy owl Scarce, no breeding Breeding pairs 0.2 to Breeding pairs 0.2 to 0.5 Mi2 many 0.5 Mi2 few nonbreeders nonbreeders Short-eared owl Absent One record Breeding pairs 3-4 Mi2
Source: Pitelka et al. 1955.
Numerical Response
Lynx-Hare Cycle Explained?
• Hares still cycle in absence of lynx
• predators can switch to other prey (e.g., grouse)
• hare food cycles in quality and edibility
• do predators just track cycles, not cause them?
Charles Krebs: detailed analysis of Lynx-Hare Cycle
• Disease and parasites? studied parasite loads in hares for yearsnone caused direct mortality
• Quality of Food?measured winter food abundancehares only eat 20-40% of what’s
availablefood addition experiments showed
initial growth response, then decline• Predation?
marked hares95% mortality due to predation by lynx, owls, coyotesexclusion showed high survival
rate
Optimal Foraging Theory
• developed by MacArthur and Pianka (1966)
• predicts minimal foraging effort for maximum energy gain
• minimal effort means lowest search and handling time
• if food patchy, predators should select best patches, lowest S&H time
Why the world is green:
1. Insects and other herbivores controlled by their predators and parasites
Hairston, Slobodkin, and Smith (HSS Model)
2. Not all plants are edible
Plant defenses from herbivory:
1. Morphological--thick leaves, thorns, needles
2. Chemical--secondary compounds
Secondary CompoundsChemicals produced by plants solely for defenseTake considerable energy to produce
1. Nitrogen compounds--derived from amino acids--alkaloids include nicotine, morphine--mostly toxic, bitter tasting
2. Terpenoids--oils and resins--mostly bitter tasting--includes terpetines, solvents
3. Phenolics--tannins that hinder digestion--used in dyes, tanning, inks
Ethnobiology: study of anthropology and biology,how humans, past and present, used or use plant andanimal resources in their culture
Allelopathy: plants use of secondary compounds fordefense against competition from other plants
--can affect growth and development of other plants around them
Corn plants: use terpenoids to attract a parasitic wasp, lays eggs in caterpillar feeding on plant
Herbivore response to plants:
1. Morphological--teeth, gut
2. Behavioral--detoxify secondary compounds
A specialized diet on plants isnot without costs:
1. Red tree vole, eats only conifer needles--high in tannins, thick
cellulose--slow metabolism, growth
2. Lynx-hare cycle--browsing by hares stimulates plants
to produce secondary compounds--food becomes less digestible--hare numbers decline--populations cycle without predator
Ungulate Impacts
-- pronghorns declined from 600 inlate 80s to 240 by 2001
-- bison, 2800 to 2400
-- one elk herd 19,000 to 12,000
Specialist versus generalist relates to optimalforaging theory as well
-- generalist flowers with small nectar rewards usually are common species
-- specialist flowers with large nectar rewards usuallyare rare species
-- a specialist predator seeks out rarer plants with largerewards rather than waste time getting smallrewards from abundant plants
-- ensures pollination of rare plant