Upload
lydieu
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Management of the Difficult Patient
with Type 3 Achalasia
Steven R. DeMeester
Professor and Clinical Scholar
Department of Surgery
Achalasia Treatment Concepts • Disease leads to non-relaxing LES and loss of
peristalsis in the esophageal body
• Treatment aimed at relief of outflow obstruction at
LES
• No treatment restores function of LES
• All therapies move obstructed LES toward open
LES (from dysphagia toward GERD)
GERD Outflow
obstruction
Low High Efficacy and Invasiveness
Botox PD (single) Lap HM+Dor
HRM Subtypes of Achalasia
I II
III
HRM and Outcome
Rohof WO, et al. Gastro, 2013
HRM and Outcome
Rohof WO, et al. Gastro, 2013
Type I (n=10) Type II (n=30) Type III (n=9) p value
Operation
- Heller Myotomy with Fundoplication
- POEM
9 (90%)
1 (10%)
23 (77%)
7 (23%)
7 (78%)
2 (22%)
0.49
Resolution of Dysphagia 8 (80%) 28 (93%) 8 (89%) 0.71
Post-operative reflux 2 (20%) 6 (20%) 1 (11%) 0.73
Post-Op Eckardt Score
Eckardt score of Zero (Asymptomatic)
1 (0-1)
40%
0 (0-1)
57%
0 (0-1)
78%
0.43
0.18
Post-Op Timed Barium: @ 1 min
- 100% Clearance
- >75% Clearance
(n=7)
0 (0%)
2 (29%)
(n=27)
15 (55%)
22 (81%)
(n=6)
5 (83%)
6 (100%)
0.18
0.49
Post-Op Timed Barium: @ 5 min
- 100% Clearance
- >75% Clearance
(n=7)
1 (14%)
3 (43%)
(n=27)
17(63%)
24 (89%)
(n=6)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
0.16
0.77
Greene CL, et al. Surg Endosc, 2014
High resolution manometry sub-classification of Achalasia: Does it really matter?
Christina L. Greene, Erica J. Chang, Daniel S. Oh , Stephanie G. Worrell, Jeffrey A. Hagen,
Steven R. DeMeester
Type III Achalasia Pre-POEM
Achalasia Type III Post-POEM
Major Differences POEM versus
Laparoscopic Myotomy and Dor
• No disruption of phreno-esophageal ligament
• Division of clasp fibers rather than sling fibers at GEJ and in cardia
• Myotomy is longer, extends further up into mediastinum, but preservation of longitudinal fibers may prevent or minimize thoracic diverticulum that often develops after standard myotomy
POEM Versus Lap Heller Myotomy
• 2 papers, both retrospective
• Portland (Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014) • 64 LHM with partial fundoplication
• 37 POEM (prior achalasia treatment okay) – 2007-9: 48 LHM
– 2010: 14 LHM and 5 POEM
– 2011: 2 LHM and 16 POEM
– 2012: 0 LHM and 16 POEM
• Northwestern (Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013)
• August 2010-May 2012 – 55 LHM with partial fundoplication
– 18 POEM (no prior treatment for achalasia both groups)
POEM vs LHM and Partial Fundoplication
Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014
POEM vs LHM and Partial Fundoplication
Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014
POEM vs LHM and Partial Fundoplication
Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014
32% vs 39%
POEM vs LHM and Partial Fundoplication
Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013
Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013
POEM vs LHM and Partial Fundoplication
POEM: A Viable Option?
• 1. Must be safe
• 2. Must produce similar results (or better) than
existing options, preferably with additional
benefits
• 3. Morbidity should be similar or better than
existing options
• 4. Results must be reproducible at multiple
centers
• 5. Patients want it
5 requirements
POEM: Safety • First human procedure in Sept 2008
• Worldwide over 1200 procedures performed
• Single center reports and recent multi-center prospective study
• No reported mortality
• Surprisingly little morbidity for new procedure
• Capnoperitoneum, capnomediastinum, capnothorax
• Injury to mucosa overlying tunnel
• Post-operative tunnel hemorrhage (1/119; 0.8%)
Ren Z, et al. Surg Endosc, 2012
Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012
POEM: Efficacy Eckardt Symptom Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 2
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
Series5
Series6
Series7
1. Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012; 2. Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014;
3. Costamagna G, et al. Dig Liver Dis, 2012; 4. von Rentein D, et al. Am J Gastro, 2012;
5. Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012; 6 and 7. Li Q, et al. J Am Coll Surg, 2013
Pre-POEM Post-POEM
n=452
POEM: Efficacy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
LES Resting Pressure
mmHg
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012; 2. Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014;
3. Costamagna G, et al. Dig Liver Dis, 2012; 4. von Rentein D, et al. Am J Gastro, 2012;
5. Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012; 6 and 7. Li Q, et al. J Am Coll Surg, 2013
n=452
POEM: Efficacy
TBS, 5 minutes
Pre: 48%
Post: 100%
Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012
POEM: Efficacy
Hungness ES, et al.
J Gastrointest Surg, 2013
POEM: Efficacy
• 70 patients from 5 centers in Europe and Canada
• Mean follow-up 10 months
Multi-institutional prospective study
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3
Eckhardt score
Pre 6 mo 12 mo
Manometry
61/70 patients
at 3 months:
LESP pre=28
post=9 mmHg
Von Renteln D, et al. Gastro, 2013
POEM: Efficacy Multi-institutional prospective study
Von Renteln D, et al. Gastro, 2013
POEM: Efficacy
• Follow-up limited (under 2 years) in
published series thus far
• Improvements in dysphagia and
regurgitation persist up to 18 months [1]
• Treatment failure reported in 11 patients
(11/452; 2.4%), 6 successfully treated with
balloon dilatation
1. Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012; 2. Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014;
3. Costamagna G, et al. Dig Liver Dis, 2012; 4. von Rentein D, et al. Am J Gastro, 2012;
5. Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012; 6 and 7. Li Q, et al. J Am Coll Surg, 2013
POEM: Morbidity
• Literature summary
• Capnoperitoneum requiring decompression: 5-10% (higher without CO2)
• Mucosal injury during tunnel creation: 10%
• Full-thickness esophageal injury (biliary balloon dissection): 5-10%
• Bleeding in tunnel: 5%
• Leak in closure: rare
Von Renteln D, et al. Gastro, 2013
POEM: Morbidity
• Reflux
• Symptoms: 33% [1], 0 [3], 0 [4], 22% [5], 17%
[6 and 7] Overall: 16.5%
• pH studies: 6/13 positive: 46% [1]
• Esophagitis: 4/14: 28% [1], 0/10 [3], 1/16: 6%
[4], 5/15: 33% [5], 20/234: 8.5% [6 and 7]
Overall: 10.3%
1. Swanstrom LL, et al. Ann Surg, 2012; 2. Bhayani NH, et al. Ann Surg, 2014;
3. Costamagna G, et al. Dig Liver Dis, 2012; 4. von Rentein D, et al. Am J Gastro, 2012;
5. Hungness ES, et al. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012; 6 and 7. Li Q, et al. J Am Coll Surg, 2013
POEM: GERD
Von Renteln D, et al. Gastro, 2013
POEM in Perspective • Treatment failure with Heller myotomy and partial
fundoplication (Kilic A, et al. Surgery, 2009)
• 46 patients, mean follow-up 6.4 years
• 9 patients (20%) with failure
• Mean time to recurrence was 21.3 months
• Reflux is a problem after Heller myotomy even with
partial fundoplication (Multi-center RCT)
6-12 months post-op
Rawlings A,
et al. Surg
Endosc, 2012
POEM in Perspective • Late failures after Heller myotomy are largely due to reflux
7-10 10-20 >20
Years post-op Csendes A, et al. Ann Surg, 2006
• 331 patients treated with achalasia balloon dilatation
• Mean follow-up 6 years
• 34% developed esophagitis
• 8.4% Barrett’s
• 28% in those with hiatal hernia, 2% in those without hiatal hernia
• 4% cancer: 12 squamous and 2 adenocarcinoma
Conclusion: POEM is a Viable Option!
• POEM achieves the short-term requirements to stay as a therapy for achalasia
• Safe
• Effectively alleviates symptoms • Short-term results are equal or better than LHM
• Minimal complications • Peri-op complications similar or less than LHM
• GERD not dissimilar to LHM
• Reproducible results at multiple centers
• Results do not seem to depend on HRM subtype
• Many patients prefer it over LHM and seek out a center where it can be performed