McKamy - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 McKamy - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mckamy-campus-improvement-plan-2011-2012 1/14

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

McKamy ElementaryCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Bridget O’Connor Principal



BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCHSCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

Creekview

Early CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Blalack BushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES

Supporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement


Continuously improve the learning environment forstudents and staff


Continuously increase operational effectiveness


Continuously increase stakeholder confidence andsupport of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

BlairBlanton

CarrolltonCentral

Country PlaceDavis

Farmers BranchFreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

Stark StricklandThompson

CENTERS

Mary Grimes Education CenterSalazar Transition School

Kelly Pre-K CenterHuie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOAL

The Goal of the Carrollton-FarmersBranch ISD is high achievement for

all students.

2



3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES

Danette PhillipsMeghan Lenert

ADMINISTRATORSBridget O’Connor, PrincipalStaci Prier, Assistant Principal

STAFF REPRESENTATIVESDenys Siegler – PKMelissa Coronilla -KAmanda Kuster – 1st gradeAraceli Slette – 2nd gradeGreg Perry – 3rd gradeAshley Keating -4th grade

Karen Anderson – 5th

gradeBilly Ferguson - SpecialsCarol Kernaghan Special Ed

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date



4

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSION

Together with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner

A complex thinker

An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFS

We believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community

is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have different

capacities and that each person’s educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILE

Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who:

Model productive citizenship

Practice successful personal management

Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior

Appreciate the value of diversity

Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who:

Continually pursue and integrate knowledge

Achieve academic standards

Apply various forms of technology

Seek educational and career options

Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who:

Solve problems critically

Create original ideas and solutions

Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information

Interact through listening and speaking

Write clearly



5

TARGET AREAS

Title I – Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I – School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.



6

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT

CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR

STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND

SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API)

STAAR – Satisfactory

STAAR – Advanced

Recognized/Exemplary DistinctionDesignationsAYP


Employee

Job Satisfaction

Campus Environment

Curriculum and Instruction

Student:

Attendance Rate

Disciplinary Placements


Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


Education Productivity Index (EPI)

API

SPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee

Campus Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS






CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONALEFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDERCONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL

SYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR – Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGYPERSON

RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Begin Instructional Rounds with a focus on teacherquestioning and student discourse

Bridget O’Connor,Shelia Maher

August 2011- August 2012 STAAR, MAP, Survey DataStaff Time

TS1, 2

2. Continue to implement Reader’s/Writer’s Workshop Bridget OConnor

August 2011 – August

2012

STAAR, MAP, Classroom

Observations

Guided Reading

Books(Eng/Spanish) TS2

3. Provide safety nets (after school tutoring, ZAPWednesdays and Saturday school) to students at risk offailing.

Bridget O’Connor, StaciPrier, Candy Johnson

September 2011 – August2012

Report Cards, STAAR, MAP,Reading Levels

Title 1$19,000.00

TS9

3. Fitness Gram – Increase student awareness of beingphysically fit.

Pam Bielefeld August 2011 – May 2012 Fitness Gram

4. Provide ongoing professional development tomaintain highly qualified teaching staff.

Bridget O’Connor Throughout the yearProfessional DevelopmentLog

TS3, 5

5. Utilize instructional specialists and coaches to

effectively implement curriculum.

Bridget O’Connor Throughout the yearSTAAR

District unit assessments

Title 1$68,144.06 TS4,5,8

6. Provide acceleration for students identified as AtRisk

Bridget O’Connor Throughout the yearSTAARClassroom assessmentsGrades each 9 Weeks

Comp Ed

$65,334.34 TS9

7. Increase reading levels for all students by purchasingEnglish and Spanish books for the guided readinglibrary and the McKamy library.

Bridget O’Connor Throughout the yearMAP and Fountas andPinnell assessments

Title 1$5,000 – GuidedReading$5,000 - Library

TS2









SYSTEM

8


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

1. Provide enrichment opportunities to students in

Literacy and Mathematical Problem Solving

Bridget OConnor,Staci Prier, Candy

Johnson

September 2011- May

2012

STAAR, MAP

2. Provide an opportunity for the fifth gradestudents to experience earth science experimentsand learning opportunities by attending a sciencecamp.

Karen Anderson February 2012 STAAR, MAPTitle 1$ 4952.00

TS6

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction – I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Provide professional growth opportunitiesthrough internal Instructional Rounds.

Bridget OConnorAugust 2011-August2012

STAAR, Data fromInstructional Rounds

TS2, 3, 5

2. Provide focused enrichment opportunities forGT, At Risk, LEP students.

Bridget O’ConnorAugust 2011 – May2012

STAAR, MAP









SYSTEM

9


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment – I would characterize my campus as having a positive attitude.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENTHold faculty get togethers to celebrate success,birthdays, showers, etc.

AmandaKuster/Kellie Slay

August 2011- May 2012 TASB Staff Survey Sunshine Fund

Continue “Charlie’s Angels” – who recognize topperformers that go the extra mile for students andstaff with Chocolate Bars and poems.

Bridget O’Connor(Bosley)

August 2011 – May2012

TASB Staff Survey Sunshine Fund


Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction – Teachers work amicably together on common problems.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement internal instructional roundsthroughout the campus

Bridget O’Connor October – MayData from InstructionalRounds related to theProblem of Practice

TS3, 5

Continue “Team Tutoring” for students at risk offailing STAAR with teachers from primary grades“Team Tutoring” with intermediate grade level

teachers

Bridget O’Connor October – May STAAR, MAP TS8,9









SYSTEM

10


Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENTEncourage students to meet the expectations forthe Principal’s Award – Attendance, Tardies,Discipline and Completing all assignments on

time.

Bridget O’Connor,Staci Prier


Attendance Rate,Tardies and DisciplineReferrals

TS6, 9, 10

Use Blackboard Connect system to notify parentsof tardies and absences.

Bridget O’Connor,Staci Prier and VickieEdwards


Attendance Rate andTardies

TS6, 7, 9, 10


Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Reduce the number of ISS and OSS placementsby 10%

Staci Prier August 2011 – 2012Number of ISS and OSSreferrals

TS9

2. Continue to implement RTime schoolwide Emily Jackson August 2011 – 2012Number of referrals for

bullying

TS9









SYSTEM

11

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Maintain Teacher Attendance of 90% or better.(Teacher Matters)

Bridget OConnor,JoCile Bayh


Teachers Attendance

2. Encourage all teachers to complete

certification for ESL and GTBridget O’Connor

August 2011 – May

2012

Teacher Certification in

ESL and GTTS3

3. Examine campus staffing efficiency and makerecommendation(s) to central office

Bridget O’Connor Jan – March Staffing Cost TS3

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

1. Hold EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENTBuild understanding of Education ProductivityIndex (EPI) through training of teachers and PTA.

Bridget O’Connor August – May 2012Feedback from teachersand PTA members









SYSTEM

12


Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Hold Parent/Teacher Conferences Nights withall parents

Bridget O’Connor November 2011 Sign In Sheets TS6

2. Use the Blackboard Connect Ed system tocontact parents regarding campus and districtactivities.

Bridget O’Connor, Throughout yearNumber of phonescalled, number ofmessages sent

TS6

3. Teachers will mail Positive Postcards to showappreciation for hard work and good examples ofcharacter values.

Bridget O’Connor Throughout yearNumber of postcardsmailed

TS6

4. Provide translation equipment and a translatorfor all school events and programs.

Bridget O’Connor Throughout year

Number of parents usingequipment andattendance of parents

needing translationequipment.

Title 1 ParentInvolvement

Funds $1231.42

TS6


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication – School has system of communication that’s open, regular and honest


RESPONSIBLE TIMELINEEVALUATION/

MEASURE RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT1. Send Month at a Glance every Friday beforethe beginning of the next month – detailingimportant events, meeting, field trips, etc.

Bridget O’Connor August 2011-May 2012 TASB survey

2.. Build leadership capacity among the GradeLevel Chairs by providing opportunities to leadPLCs and other PD opportunities.

Bridget O’ConnorOctober 2011–May2012

TASB survey TS3, 5

3. Structure faculty meetings to encouragevertical team collaboration.

Bridget O’ConnorAugust 2011 – May2012

TASB survey









SYSTEM

13

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank2011

Target2011 Rank

2012Target

2012 Rank

Education Productivity Index(EPI)

191 70 25

Academic Performance Index(API)

187 70 25

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 141 70 25

Employee Opinion Survey2011

Result2012

Target2012

ResultEmployee Job Satisfaction – I would

recommend this campus to a friend as a

good place to work. 92% 95%

Employee Campus Environment – I would

characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.

90% 93%

Employee Curriculum and InstructionSupport – Teachers work amicably together

on common problems. 88% 90%

Employee Campus Communication –School has system of communication that’s

open, regular and honest.

88% 90%

AEIS2011

Result

2012

Target

2012

ResultCampus Rating E AAP

Student Attendance Rate 96.9 98

Students with Disciplinary Placements 9% 5%

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey)2011

Result2012

Target2012

Result

Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District 96% 98%

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)C-FBISD Met AYP

2008 Met

2009 Met

2010 Met

2011 Met

Target 2012 Met

Results 2012









SYSTEM

14


READING/ELAEADING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

TargetResul

tTarget Result

Afr. American 97% 98% 40% 42%

Hispanic 92% 93% 45% 45%

White 96% 97% 60% 60%Econ. Dis. 95% 94% 43% 44%

LEP 89% 90% 28% 30%

G/T 100% 100% 83% 90%

Special Ed 90% 91% 40% 42%

All Students 95% 96% 47% 48%

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV

TargetResul

tTarget Result

Afr. American 96% 100% 22% 25%

Hispanic 95% 96% 32% 33%

White 81% 90% 31% 33%

Econ. Dis. 94% 96% 24% 26%

LEP 100% 100% 40% 41%

G/T 100% 100% 100% 100%

Special Ed 75% 80% 25% 27%

All Students 92% 94% 28% 30%

SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV

TargetResul

tTarget Result

Afr. American

HispanicWhite

Econ. Dis.LEP

G/T

Special Ed

All Students

MATHEMATICSMATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 97% 98% 40% 41%

Hispanic 92% 93% 34% 36%

White 96% 97% 46% 48%

Econ. Dis. 95% 96% 40% 42%

LEP 83% 90% 33% 36%

G/T 100%100%

100% 100%

Special Ed 93% 95% 40% 42%

All Students 95% 96% 42% 44%

SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 89% 90% 42% 44%

Hispanic 92% 93% 48% 50%

White 95% 95% 68% 70%

Econ. Dis. 86% 90% 40% 40%

LEP 100%100%

0% 30%

G/T 100%100%

100% 100%

Special Ed 86% 90% 57% 58%

All Students 93% 94% 52% 55%

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

SATISFACTORY ADVANCED# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

Documents

McKamy - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012