Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Medical InformaticsMedical Informatics
and Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics
in Translational Medicinein Translational Medicine
Casimir A. Kulikowski, Ph.D.Casimir A. Kulikowski, Ph.D.Board of Governors Professor of Computer ScienceBoard of Governors Professor of Computer Science
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USARutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Perspectives on Medical Informatics WorkshopPerspectives on Medical Informatics Workshop
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, imim Neuenheimer Neuenheimer FeldFeld, April 5, 2008, April 5, 2008
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Bioinformatics and Medical Bioinformatics and Medical
Informatics Informatics
• Bioinformatics key to
making the Human
Genome Project possible
• Increasingly promising in
enabling and scaling
omics technologies for
translational impact on
healthcare
• Medical Informatics central to scalability of health care systems, clinical research, and education
• Web-based knowledge sources and search technologies, standardized documentation and decision support
2
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Expectations Expectations
• Bioinformatics will
translate the flood of
omic data into
personalized medicine
for patients
• Medical Informatics
promises universal
technologies for
healthcare, making
evidence-based and
preventive medicine
routine
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Many Translational Opportunities Many Translational Opportunities
for for BionformaticsBionformatics
• Rapid growth of -omics data and proliferation of genomic and proteomics data bases
• Increasing number of analysis methods, software, servers for integrating heterogeneous data
• Interconnected and semantically normalized linkages between heterogeneous data sources
• Phenotypic clinical data increasingly standardized through Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
• Consumer-oriented commercial personal “whole”-genome datasets (from very minimal to fairly reasonable coverage depending on cost)
3
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
But, an abundance of challenges alsoBut, an abundance of challenges also
• Data capture for genotype, phenotype and intermediate data still very site-dependent
• Data unreliable and hard to normalize - few generalized, reliable reference sets
• Complementarities/redundancies/alignment of multimodal datasets (sequence, structure, function, imaging) not easy to determine from literature on prior studies
• Data analysis and integration methods complex, nonstandardized, hard to understand and evaluate for non-specialists.
• Semantic web still in its infancy
• Underlying omics is an ever-shifting science and technology of unprecedented size, scale, and diversity…
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
What is new in translational biomedical What is new in translational biomedical
informatics?informatics?
• 1st AMIA Summit on Bioinformatics in March 2008
• Highlights of research advances from translational bioinformatics and medical informatics
• Identification of “grand challenges” for both fields
• Relationship to underlying content and method disciplines
• Questions about information quality, reliability, processing, dissemination, education and training
4
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Selective Highlights from AMIA STBIO Selective Highlights from AMIA STBIO
Meeting, just heldMeeting, just held
in March 2008 in March 2008 -- first ever meeting on first ever meeting on
Translational BioinformaticsTranslational Bioinformatics
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Four Tracks at AMIA STBIO:Four Tracks at AMIA STBIO:
• T1: Informatics Methods for the Analysis of
Molecular and Clinical Data
• T 2: Relating and Representing Phenotypes and
Disease
• T 3: Dissecting Disease through the Study of
Organisms, Evolution, and Taxonomy
• T 4: Computational Approaches to Finding Molecular
Mechanisms and Therapies for Disease
5
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Keynote Speaker Highlights NIH Keynote Speaker Highlights NIH
ProgramsPrograms• Alan Krensky, Director of the new Office of Portfolio
Analysis and Strategic Initiatives (OPASI), Deputy Director,
NIH - Researcher on T- lymphocytes in disease - gave
overview of NIH programs in translational bioinformatics:
• NCBCs (National Centers for Biomedical Computing)
• CTSAs (Clinical and Translational Sciences Award)
• caBIG (Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid)
• BIRN (Biomedical Informatics Research Network)
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
NIH National Centers for NIH National Centers for
Biomedical Computing (Biomedical Computing (NCBCsNCBCs))
• Major networks of investigators connected at major centers
and collaborating groups nationwide • Stanford SIMBIOS - Simulation of Biological Structures, Altman;
• Michigan NCIBI - National Ctr Integrative Biomedical Informatics, Athey;
• Columbia National Ctr for Multi-Scale Analysis of Gen and Cell Network
MAGNet, Floratos/Califano;
• BWH-Harvard NA-MIC Nat Alliance for Medical Imaging Computing,
Kikinis;
• BWH-CH-Harvard i2b2 - Informatics for Integrating Biology to Bedside,
Kohane;
• Stanford NCBC - National Center for Biomedical Ontology, Mussen;
• UCLA CCB -Center for Computational Biology, Toga.
6
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Example: Population Studies from MR Example: Population Studies from MR
Brain Imaging Brain Imaging --> Probabilistic Brain > Probabilistic Brain
Function Atlases (Toga, UCLA CCB)Function Atlases (Toga, UCLA CCB)
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
STBIO Panel Discussions STBIO Panel Discussions -- Snapshot of Snapshot of
Translational Biomedical InformaticsTranslational Biomedical Informatics
• Informatics for Genome-Phenome Correlation Using De-Identified Specimens and EMR data (preliminary promising trial from Vanderbilt)
• Government regulation in decision support (none if open loop DS with physician intervention)
• Clinical Trials international collaborative network of the Immune Tolerance Network (good progress)
• Translational Imaging Informatics (imaging and bioinformatics advancing individually, but only early interactions)
• HealthGrid (caBIG experiences on scaling)
7
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
More Snapshots from STBIO PanelsMore Snapshots from STBIO Panels
• High Dimensionality Data in Translational Medicine(many advanced results reported by Michigan NCIBI)
• Perspectives from the Front: Bench to Bedside (biomarker discovery highlighting NIH role - difficulties of integration of different data types and protocols)
• Discovery and Dissolving Barriers between Clinical Care and Research (Early examples)
• SNPs in Healthcare (many new ones proposed and tested -but do not address the multi-gene nature of many diseases and epigenetic problems…..)
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Year in Review of Translational Year in Review of Translational
Bioinformatics Russ Altman, Stanford Univ.Bioinformatics Russ Altman, Stanford Univ.
• Used PubMed and Google Scholar searches to find top papers - of
which 27 were reported by Altman
• High throughput sequence analysis and genome-wide association
studies related to diseases now ubiquitous (eg Wellcome Trust
Consortium study reported in Nature covering 14,000 cases of 7
common diseases); significant neuroscience studies of brain cell
populations; Tylenol effect on liver from blood gene expression
signatures; validation issues in microarray studies of cancer outcomes;
gene expression predicting malarial response categories; etc.
• Main Informatics papers on heterogeneous dataset integration; text
mining, OMIM shows disease-linked genes have more physical
interaction; ontologies and citations on Medline; etc.
8
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Genomics ProteomicsEpidemiology
Environmental Medicine
Clinical Practice, Research, Education
Bioinformatics
Medical/Health/Consumer Informatics
Biophysics/engineeringBiophysics/engineering
Controlled Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials
Public Health Informatics
Spectrum of Biomedical Informatics for Spectrum of Biomedical Informatics for
Translational Healthcare: Micro to MacroTranslational Healthcare: Micro to Macro
Systems BiologySystems Biology
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Diversity of Biomedical Informatics:Diversity of Biomedical Informatics:
Subjects, Contents, GoalsSubjects, Contents, Goals
Individual Patients or Subjects
Health records and related documentsHealth records and related documents
Health care, clinical research, education
Populations of patients, hosts & parasites, microorganisms
Health and environment records, documents, mapsHealth and environment records, documents, maps
Public health, epidemiological research, education
Slide 15
Biomolecules, genomes, cells, tissues, organisms, microbiomes
Experimental designs and records of resultsExperimental designs and records of results
Biosciences research, biomedical systems R & DBiosciences research, biomedical systems R & D
9
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Slide 3
Goals within the Translational Spectrum are very Goals within the Translational Spectrum are very
differentdifferent
. . Medical goals emphasize Medical goals emphasize personal decisions:personal decisions:
diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of individual individual
patientspatients;;
. Biomedical Research focuses on . Biomedical Research focuses on generalizable generalizable
experimentation for discovery: evidenceexperimentation for discovery: evidence of patterns of patterns
over groups of phenotypes and genotypes at various over groups of phenotypes and genotypes at various
levels (from the molecule to organisms and their levels (from the molecule to organisms and their
populations).populations).
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Genomics Proteomics Epidemiology
Environmental Medicine
Clinical Practice, Research
and Education
Bioinformatics Medical/Health/Consumer Informatics
Biophysics/engineeringBiophysics/engineering
Mechanism & HypothesisMechanism & Hypothesis--driven driven
Experimentation & DiscoveryExperimentation & Discovery
Adaptation to Individual CareAdaptation to Individual Care
Stratified Group/Population Stratified Group/Population
Exploratory and HypothesisExploratory and Hypothesis--driven driven
Experimentation & DiscoveryExperimentation & Discovery
Controlled Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials
Public Health Informatics
Translational Biomedical Informatics: Translational Biomedical Informatics:
Contrast of Research & PracticeContrast of Research & Practice
10
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Genomics Proteomics Epidemiology
Environmental Medicine
Clinical Practice, Research
and Education
Bioinformatics
Medical/Health/Consumer Informatics
Biophysics/engineeringBiophysics/engineering
Mechanism & HypothesisMechanism & Hypothesis--driven driven
Experimentation & DiscoveryExperimentation & Discovery
Adaptation to Individual CareAdaptation to Individual Care
Stratified Group/Population Stratified Group/Population
Exploration and HypothesisExploration and Hypothesis--driven driven
Experimentation & DiscoveryExperimentation & Discovery
Controlled Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials
Public Health Informatics
Biomedical Informatics: Biomedical Informatics:
Contrast of Research & PracticeContrast of Research & Practice
Medical Medical
Expertise & Expertise &
JudgmentJudgment
Individual caseIndividual case--basedbased
Health Care PracticeHealth Care Practice
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Genomics
Proteomics
Epidemiology
Environmental MedicineClinical Practice, Research
and EducationBioinformatics
Medical & Health Informatics
Evidence and Personalization in
Biomedical Informatics
Biophysics/engineeringBiophysics/engineering
MechanismMechanism--based Experimentationbased Experimentation
NEW SCIENTIFIC BRIDGING PARADIGM NEW SCIENTIFIC BRIDGING PARADIGM
For Adaptation to Individual CareFor Adaptation to Individual Care
PopulationPopulation--based Experimentationbased Experimentation
Controlled Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials
??
Individual caseIndividual case--basedbased
Health Care PracticeHealth Care Practice
11
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Genomics
Proteomics
Epidemiology
Environmental MedicineClinical Practice, Research
and EducationBioinformatics
Medical & Health Informatics
Evidence and Personalization in
Biomedical Informatics
Biophysics/engineeringBiophysics/engineering
MechanismMechanism--based Experimentationbased Experimentation
NEW SCIENTIFIC BRIDGING PARADIGM NEW SCIENTIFIC BRIDGING PARADIGM
For Adaptation to Individual Care:For Adaptation to Individual Care:
PopulationPopulation--based Experimentationbased Experimentation
Controlled Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials
MathematicalMathematical--StatisticalStatistical--CognitiveCognitive
Informatics that is Computationally ScalableInformatics that is Computationally Scalable
and and IndividualizableIndividualizable
Individual CaseIndividual Case--basedbased
Health Care PracticeHealth Care Practice
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Central Translational Medicine
Challenge is INFORMATICS
• Massive combinatorial search and selection for
trusted sources, studies, methods and content.
• Filtering for applicability to the individual,
reliability of source information, and interactions
of content into a patient-specific information
(PSI) model.
• Application of the PSI model in the context of
risk, cost, and uncertainty of the patient evidence
and environment.
12
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Key is the Integration of knowledge sources Key is the Integration of knowledge sources
for biomedical inquiry and how to apply to for biomedical inquiry and how to apply to
the individual patientthe individual patient
• Reasoning strategies for discovery, testing, and evaluating hypotheses (relations between formal and cognitive models - what is bioconsensus?)
• Knowledge representations for biomedicine (ontologies, biomathematical models, simulation, operations research, artificial intelligence, and experimental design)
• Representations of the biomedical literature (text mining, modeling/logic of arguments, annotation of images, diagramatic abstraction and reasoning)
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Key Key
Translational Translational
Challenge:Challenge:
Personalized Personalized
vsvs. .
EvidenceEvidence--
BasedBased
MedicineMedicine
13
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Computational vs. Theoretical Computational vs. Theoretical
AspectsAspects
• Computational scalability, while difficult,
has always been overcome up to now by
new technology and theory…….
• Adequacy of theories for “translating”
general mathematical-statistical-cognitive
models from mechanism/group evidence to
the individual remains a deep, open problem
in (computational) epistemology……
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Today: Incremental Today: Incremental
Translational InformaticsTranslational Informatics. Clinical and epidemiological inference based on
existing models - how and when to extract how and when to extract information from scientific models and textsinformation from scientific models and texts and heuristic/systematicheuristic/systematic application to individuals and population subgroups (Computational Vision and Deep Blue Chess strategic choice analogies for starting the process?)
. How to develop clinical and translational casedevelop clinical and translational case--based based applicability guidelines more scientificallyapplicability guidelines more scientifically – what are different models of evidence applied to decision-making and problem-solving for different environmental, organizational, and social constraints and their individual applicability…..
14
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Beyond Incremental Translational Beyond Incremental Translational
InformaticsInformatics
. Relation between formal and informal models of decision
making under risk and uncertainty: rational choice/game
theory and its alternatives or, visual cognition for exploring vs.
formal models for testing hypotheses….
. Bioethics models and informatics - research, practice and
education
. Models of Biomedical and Health Care Organizations
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
SynergiesSynergies betweenbetween BioinformaticsBioinformatics & & MedicalMedical
InformaticsInformatics[adapted from Maojo and Kulikowski, BIOINFOMED 02]
Expertise in clinical
systems and practice applications
Informatics tools and methods
Informatics modelling methodology and practice
Theoretical grounding in molecular and biophysical
systems and population genetics models
Biological Foundations(Molecular/
cellular)
(Tissue/organ/
system)
Medical InformaticsBioinformatics
15
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Interdisciplinary Workshop Example
from Genetic EpidemiologyDIMACS Workshop on
Computational Issues in Genetic Epidemiology August 21 - 22, 2008
DIMACS Center, CoRE Building, Rutgers University
Organizers: Andrew Scott Allen, Duke University, andrew.s.allen at duke.edu ,Ion Mandoiu, University of Connecticut, ion at engr.uconn.edu ,Dan Nicolae, University of Chicago, nicolae at galton.uchicago.edu, Yi Pan, Georgia State University, pan at cs.gsu.edu,Alex Zelikovsky, Georgia State
University,alexz at cs.gsu.edu
Workshop Announcement: There is strong evidence that genes play a major role in susceptibility to all
common human diseases. While linkage analysis has been very successful in finding the genes involved
in Mendelian diseases such as Huntington disease, early onset Alzheimer's disease and cystic fibrosis,
current interest has shifted towards mapping genes involved in diseases with complex etiologies such
as diabetes and cancer, for which association studies have been shown to be more powerful.
The workshop will bring together computer scientists,geneticists, and statisticians aiming to address
current computational challenges in gene mapping, which include dealing with complex missing data
patterns, multiple hypotheses testing, population substructure,gene-gene and gene-environment
interactions. New directions of research, such as capturing the effects of structural genomic
variation and using biological networks in whole-genome studies, will also be investigated.
© C. A. Kulikowski – Rutgers University
Biomedical Informatics Laboratory
Educational Challenge from the Complexity Educational Challenge from the Complexity
and Heterogeneity of Knowledge required for and Heterogeneity of Knowledge required for
Translational ResearchTranslational Research
Greatest challenges are of understanding our genotypes - phenotype relationships and how they interact with the environment - what are our extended phenotypes and can we develop a true systeomics that extend to the psychological and social dimensions