Upload
chasity-hilson
View
240
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Memory
Short-Term Memory & Working Memory
THE MULTI-STORE MODEL OF MEMORYSensory store
Holds sensory information for a very brief time Information not attended to is lost
Short-term memory (STM) Holds information for limited time 7-9 items capacity Information not rehearsed is displaced Once rehearsed information is transfered to LTM
Long-term memory (LTM) Permenant memory store Unlimited
ATKINSON & SHIFFIN MODEL
SENSORY MEMORY Iconic store
Visual information is stored Echoic store
Auditory information is stored
SHORT-TERM STORE Example: Trying to remember a telephone number
Limited capacity and fragile storage Any distraction causes forgetting
The recency effect: Last few items in a list are better remembered that the first or middle
words
The primacy effect: First few words remembered better than the middle words
SHORT-TERM STORE-Duration Peterson and Peterson (1959)
Task of remembering three letters while counting backwards by threes.
The ability to remember the three letters declined to 50% after 6 seconds
This indicates that information is lost from short-term memory rapidly.
This may be because counting backwards results in interference or diverts attention away from STM.
SHORT-TERM STORE: Rehearsal Rehearsal maintains information in short-term memory.
Words that are shorter and can be rehearsed rapidly should remain in STM
Words that take longer to reheasre will decay from STM.
Some evidence supports this while others do not. Studies which do not support it cast doubt on the fact that short-term
memory depends on rehearsal.
SHORT-TERM STORE: Forgetting Forgetting from STM:
Decay Proactive Interference (disruption of current learning by previous
learnt material) Example: Trying to study cognitive psychology after studying for
neuropsychology. Neuropsychology inteferes with cognitive psychology learning
WORKING MEMORYBaddeley and Hitch (1974) and Baddeley (1986)
Central Executive Resembles attention Controlling unit Limited capacity
Phonological Loop Stores speech-based information
Visuo-spatial sketchpad Stores visual-based information
Episodic buffer Integrates information from the Visuo-spatial sketchpad and Phonological
loop. Controlled by the Central Executive
WORKING MEMORY
WORKING MEMORY
WORKING MEMORY: Assumptions If two tasks use the same componet, they cannot be performed
successfully together.
If two tasks use different components, it should be possible to perform them well together.
WORKING MEMORYPHONOLOGICAL LOOP Phonological Similarity Effect
Recall of words is better when words sound different than when they sound the same.
Example: Recall is better for words such as UP and ODD, than HE and KNEE
Speech based reherasal within the phonological loop
WORKING MEMORYPHONOLOGICAL LOOP Word Length Effect
Better recall of shorter words than longer words Takes longer time to rehearse the longer words which causes greater
levels of decay.
WORKING MEMORYPHONOLOGICAL LOOP
a) A passive phonological store directly concerned with speech production
Auditory presentation of words gain direct access to the phonological store
b) An articulatory process linked to speech production that gives access to the phonological loop
Words presented visually need to be articulated then gain access to the phonological store – access is therefore indirect
Word length effect therefore is dependent on articulatory rehearsal
PHONOLOGICAL LOOP
VISUO-SPATIAL SKETCHPAD Temporary storage and manipulation of spatial and visual
information Two components:
The visual cache Stores information about visual form and colour
The inner scribe Deals wıth spatial and movement information
Rehearses information in the visual cache
Tranfers information from the visual cache to the central executive
Involved in the planning and execution of body and limb movements
CENTRAL EXECUTIVE Most important component of working memory Damage to the frontal lobes can cause impairements to the
central executive Functions:
Switching attention between tasks Planning subgoals to achieve goals Selective attention and inhibition Updating and checking the contents of working memory Coding representations in working memory for time and place of
appearance
CENTRAL EXECUTIVE Single or multiple central executive functions? Evidence favours the latter Three central executive functions
Shifting attention Updating information Response inhibition All share common processes (e.g., attention) but also function
independently.
EPISODIC BUFFER Stores and intergrates information from both the phonological
loop and visuo-spatial sketchpad
MEMORY PROCESSES Encoding
Storage Retrieval
TESTS OF MEMORY Free recall
Hardest type of recall Least environmental support
Cued recall Second hardest type of recall Provides some environmental support
Recognition Easiest type of recall Memory best under recognition Provides environmental support
TEST OF MEMORY Explicit Memory
Conscious and deliberate retrieval of past events
Exam
Implicit Memory
Memory not involving consious recollection
Word stem completion
Complete the word ‘Ten___’
LEVELS OF PROCESSING Craik and Lockhart (1972) Attentional processes at learning determine what information is
stored in long-term memory Various levels of processing
Shallow processing Physical analysis of stimuli
Deep or semantic processing Analysis of meaning Deep or semantic processing produce more elaboration, longer lasting and
stronger memory traces than shallow processing
LEVELS OF PROCESSING Two types of rehearsal
Maintenance rehearsal
Repeating information to remember it
Elaborative rehearsal
Involves semantic-meaning processing
Information which is sematically processed will be trasnfered to long term memory
ELABORATION Craik and Tulving (1975)
Elaboration of processing is important
Aids LTM
The kind and amount of elaboration is critical for recall
Precise semantic encodings are better
DISTINCTIVENESS Eysenck (1979)
Distinctive or unique memory traces are recalled more than non distinctive memory traces
THEORIES OF FORGETTING Ebbinghause studied forgetting with himself being the only
participant.
He learned and recalled a list of nonsense syllables which had no meaning over several trials.
Forgetting was very rapaid over the first hour after learning which slowed down thereafter.
REPRESSION Freud argued that anxiety provoking material is often unable to
gain access to conscious awareness, known as repression.
Adaptive function to maintain psychological well-being
INTERFERENCE THEORY Dominant approach
Ability to remember currently learned information can be disrupted with previously learnt material or what we learn in the future.
Proactive Interference
Previous learning interferes
Retroactive Interference
Later learning disrupts earlier learning
CUE-DEPENDENT FORGETTING Tulving (1974)-two reasons for forgetting Trace-Dependent Forgetting
Information is no longer stored in memory Cue-Dependent Forgetting
Information is stored in memory but cannot be accessed Cue-dependent forgetting associated with external cues (categories)
and internal cues (mood) If the mood of retrieval is different from learning information will be
blocked The mood effect is stronger for positive than negative moods and for
personal events
CONSOLIDATION Is a process lasting for several hours or even days which fixes
information in LTM.
‘New memories are clear but fragile and old ones are faded but robust’ (Wixted, 2004, p.265).
Consolidation process for one memory can be distrupted by other memories, so better consolidation will take place during sleep than awake coz fewer memories are being formed.
CONSOLIDATION Sleep will aid the consolidation period early in the retention
interval, as, thats when memories are vulnerable to disruption.
Those who slept after learning remembered 81% than those who slept later 66%