merhgh

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    1/37

    UWB Antennas &

    Measurements

    Gabriela Quintero

    MICS UWB Network Meeting

    11/12/2007

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    2/37

    Outline

    UWB Antenna Analysis Frequency Domain

    Time Domain

    Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements

    Spectrum Analyzer Settings

    Fourier Series

    Fourier Transform

    UWB Measurements

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    3/37

    Outline

    UWB Antenna Analysis Frequency Domain

    Time Domain

    Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements

    Spectrum Analyzer Settings

    Fourier Series

    Fourier Transform

    UWB Measurements

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    4/37

    UWB Antennas

    Impulse radio UWB pulse (3.1 10.6 GHz)

    MICS pulse (4 4.5 GHz)

    Time and frequency domain Analysis Still with basic antenna architectures

    Monopole

    Vivaldi

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    5/37

    Time and Frequency Domain

    Two different softwares used to characterizethe antennas

    Ansoft HFSS FD

    Frequency Sweep at all frequencies Parameters in FD (S11, Gain, E-field, etc.)

    CST Microwave Studio TD

    Select the pulse BW

    Parameters in FD (S11, Gain, etc.)

    E-field in TD

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    6/37

    Frequency Domain Transfer Function - S21

    Relates the output voltage with the inputvoltage

    Can be derived from the Friis TransmissionEquation

    And obtain

    ( ) ( ) ( )j r

    cr tV H V e

    =

    ( )( )2

    2 2P 1 1 ( , ) ( , )

    4

    rcdt cdr t r t t t r r r t

    t

    e e D D

    P R

    2r

    =

    ( )

    2

    11

    ( )1 ( , , )

    ( ) 4

    rcdt t t t

    t

    Ve S E

    V R

    =

    Tx Rx

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    7/37

    Frequency Domain

    HFSS

    SimulationS11

    E-field

    Transfer

    FunctionMatlab

    Pulse PSD

    Rx Pulse

    PSDIFFT

    Rx Pulse

    TD

    Tx Rx

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    8/37

    Monopole System

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20-35

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    Return Loss

    Frequency [GHz]

    Magnitude[dB]

    Simulated

    Measured

    0 5 10 15 200

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Normalized Magnitude

    Frequency [GHz]

    Simulated

    Measured

    0 5 10 15 20-500

    -450

    -400

    -350

    -300

    -250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    Frequency [GHz]

    Phase [radians]

    S11

    HFSS

    NWA

    TF S21

    Rx + Tx Pulse

    PSDRx + Tx Pulse

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12-120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    Frequency [GHz]

    Gauss

    ianPulse[dB]

    Power Spectral Density

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12-120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    MIC

    SPulse,

    [dB]

    Frequency [GHz]

    Input

    Simulated

    Measured

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    Time [ns]

    GaussianPulse

    Input Vs. Output pulse (normalized)

    -1 0 1 2 3 4-1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    M

    ICSPulse

    Time [ns]

    Input

    Simulated

    Measured

    Tx Rx

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    9/37

    0 5 10 15 200

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Normalized Magnitude

    Frequency [GHz]

    Simulated

    Measured

    0 5 10 15 20-500

    -450

    -400

    -350

    -300

    -250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    Frequency [GHz]

    Phase [radians]

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20-35

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0Return Loss

    Frequency [GHz]

    Magnitude[dB]

    Simulated

    Measured

    Vivaldi SystemS11

    HFSS

    NWA

    TF S21

    Rx + Tx Pulse0 2 4 6 8 10 12-120-100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    Frequency [GHz]

    Gaussian

    Pulse,

    [dB]

    Power Spectral Density

    Input

    Simulated

    Measured

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12-120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    MICSP

    ulse,

    [dB]

    Frequency [GHz]

    Rx + Tx Pulse

    PSD0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    Time [ns]

    Gaussia

    nPulse

    Input Vs. Output pulse (normalized)

    Input

    Simulated

    Measured

    -1 0 1 2 3 4-1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    MICS

    Pulse

    Time [ns]

    Tx Rx

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    10/37

    CST: Monopole Antenna

    4.25 GHz 6.85 GHz

    H-plane

    E-plane

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    11/37

    CST: Vivaldi Antenna

    4.25 GHz 6.85 GHz

    H-plane

    E-plane

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    12/37

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4-1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    UWB Pulse

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16-1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    MICS Pulse

    Input Pulse

    E-field at 80

    Time Domain

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5-1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    UWB Pulse

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16-1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    MICS Pulse

    Input Pulse

    E-field at 80

    Monopole Vivaldi

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    13/37

    Time Domain

    Fidelity Factor Measures the faithfulness with which a device

    reproduces the time shape of the input signal.

    f(t) = Input signal at antenna terminals r(t) = Radiated E-field in time domain

    The signals are normalized to have unit

    energy

    and2/1

    2

    )(

    )()(

    =

    dttr

    trtr

    1/ 22

    ( ) ( )

    ( )

    f tf t

    f t dt

    =

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    14/37

    Time Domain

    The fidelity parameter,F, is determined by

    the peak of the cross-correlation function of

    the signals

    max ( ) ( )F f t r t dt

    = +

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    15/37

    Time Domain

    CST

    Simulation

    E-field (t,, )

    Input signal

    Fidelity

    Factor

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    16/37

    Time Domain

    0

    30

    60

    90

    120

    150

    180

    -150

    -120

    -90

    -60

    -30

    0.70.8

    0.91

    Vivaldi Fideli ty Factor

    UWB PulseMICS Pulse

    0

    30

    60

    90

    120

    150

    180

    -150

    -120

    -90

    -60

    -30

    0.70.8

    0.91

    Monopole Fideli ty Factor

    UWB PulseMICS Pulse

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    17/37

    Outline

    UWB Antenna Analysis

    Frequency Domain

    Time Domain

    Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements

    Spectrum Analyzer Settings

    Fourier Series

    Fourier Transform

    UWB Measurements

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    18/37

    MEASUREMENTS

    Average Power Peak Power

    TP

    PTPPE

    effavg

    avgeff

    =

    ==

    0

    0

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    19/37

    MEASUREMENTS

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    20/37

    Spectrum Analyzer

    RBW VBW

    Scan Time

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    21/37

    Spectrum Analyzer

    Line Spectrum Pulse Spectrum

    A pulse repetition rate equal to the resolution bandwidth is the demarcation line

    between a true Fourier-series spectrum, where each line is a response

    representing the energy contained in that harmonic, and a pulse or Fourier-

    transform response.Agilent Spectrum Analyzers Series.Application note 150-2

    pp. 32

    1B> or B>PRF

    T

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    22/37

    Line Spectrum

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    23/37

    Line Spectrum

    All individual frequency components are resolved.

    Line spacing is 1kHZ = PRF

    Spacing of sidelobe minima is 10kHz =

    The amplitude of each line will not change whenRBW is changed, as long as RBW

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    24/37

    Line Spectrum

    Pulse DesensitizationOnly valid for Fourier line spectrum.

    ( )10 10

    10

    [ ] 20log 20log

    [ ] 10log ( )

    = =

    =

    eff

    L eff

    avg

    effpeak

    dB PRF T

    PdB PRF

    P

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    25/37

    Pulse Spectrum

    Its a combination of time and frequency

    display.

    The lines that form the envelope are pulse lines

    in time domain.

    Each line is displayed when a pulse occurs.

    Frequency domain display of the spectrum

    envelope.

    The amplitude of the envelope increase linearly as

    RBW increases. (As long as RBW < 0.2/ eff).

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    26/37

    Pulse Spectrum

    -30dBm CW carrier modulated by a pulsetrain with a PRF of 100Hz, eff= 100s and

    RBW = 1kHz = 0.1/ eff

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    27/37

    Pulse Spectrum

    In Figure 23, we lost the linear relationship between bandwidthand display amplitude RBW > 0.2/ eff . The resolution of thesidelobes is lost to a great extent.

    In Figure 24 RBW = 1/ eff, we get a display with an amplitudepractically equal to the peak amplitude of the pulsed signal.

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    28/37

    Pulse Spectrum

    Pulse desensitization correction factor

    RBW

    BK

    RBWKdB

    imp

    effp

    =

    = )(log20][ 10

    K= 1.617 for Agilnet ESA Series856x or 859x

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    29/37

    Average Power

    FCC Definition The average limit is

    500 uV/m, as

    measured at 3meters with a 1 MHz

    resolution bandwidth

    (RBW). Equivalentto an EIRP of -41.25

    dBm/MHz

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12-80

    -75

    -70

    -65

    -60

    -55

    -50

    -45

    -40

    FCC Indoor Spectral Mask

    EIRP[dBm/MH

    z]

    Frequency [GHz]

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    30/37

    Average Measurements

    If 10 kHz > VBW >10 Hz Video averaging should be used in

    conjunction with peak hold.

    If NO dithering or PPM

    Line spectrum setting (VBW RBW)

    RBW < 0.3 PRF Average level = highest line in the

    emission line spectrum

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    31/37

    Average Measurements

    If dithering or PPM True pulse spectrum settings

    A pulse desensitization correction factor

    would be added to the measurement toobtain a peak level.

    The average is calculated using the dutycycle factor in dB

    ( )10[ ] 10logavg

    eff

    peak

    PdB PRF

    P

    =

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    32/37

    Peak Measurements

    pp. 174

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    33/37

    Peak Measurements

    Peak level when measured over a

    bandwidth of 50 MHz

    50MHz widest victim receiver that is likely tobe encountered.

    Peak measurements based on a 50 MHz

    (resolution) bandwidth may not be feasible.

    The widest available RBW that can beemployed for peak measurements is 3 MHz.

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    34/37

    Peak Measurements

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    35/37

    Peak Measurements

    Peak emission level of 0 dBm/50 MHz

    = 58mV/m at 3 meters is adopted.

    Equivalent to:

    A peak EIRP of -24.44 dBm/3 MHz

    Peak field strength of 3.46 mV/m at 3

    meters with a 3 MHz RBW.

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    36/37

    Rules of Thumb

    Line Spectrum Pulse Spectrum

    RBW

  • 7/26/2019 merhgh

    37/37

    QUESTIONS?