View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Micromegas TPC
P. Colas, SaclayLectures at the TPC school, Tsinghua University, Beijing,
January 7-11, 2008
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 2
OUTLINEOUTLINETPC, drift and amplification
Micromegas principle of operation
Micromegas properties
Gain stability and uniformity, optimal gap
Energy resolution
Electron collection efficiency and transparency
Ion feedback suppression
Micromegas manufacturing
meshes and pillars
InGrid
“bulk” technology
Resistive anode Micromegas
Digital TPC
PART I – operation and properties
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 3
OUTLINEOUTLINE
The COMPASS experiment
The CAST experiment
The KABES beam spectrometer
The T2K ND-280 TPC
The Large Prototype for the ILC
Micromegas neutron detectors
TPCs for Dark Matter search and neutrino studies
PART II – Micromegas experiments
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 4
Electrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalancheElectrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalanche
E
Mean free path =nm at 1eV)
Typical (thermic) energy of an electron in a gas: 0.04 eV
Low enough electric field (<1kV/cm) : collisions with gas atoms limit the electron velocity to vdrift = f(E)
(effective friction force)
At higher fields ionizationionization takes place (gain 10 V in 2m =50kV/cm)
magboltz
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 5
Cross-sections of most common quenchers follow the same kind of shape, but not all (noticeably, not He); Dip due to Ramsauer effect (interf. when e-wavelength~mol.size)
Note : attachment
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 6
Electrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalancheElectrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalanche
Thanks to the Ramsauer effect, there is a maximum drift velocity at low drift field : important for a TPC, to have a homogeneous time to z relation
Typical drift velocities : 5 cm/s
(or 50 m/ns)
Higher with CF4 mixtures
Lower with CO2 mixtures
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 7
AttachmentAttachment
Ne = Ne0 exp(-az) a can be from m-1 to (many m) -1
Attachment coefficient = 1 / attenuation length
2-body : e- ; 3-body : ea
Exemple of 2-body attachment : O2, CF4
Exemple of 3-body attachment : O2, O2+CO2
Very small (10 ppm) contamination
of O2, H2O, or some solvants, can
ruin the operation of a TPC
electron capture by the molecules
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 8
DriftDrift
DiffusionDiffusion
z.Cσ DTt
)²(1
)0()(
BB T
T
z.Cσ DLl limits z resolution (typically 200-500 /√cm)
Limits r resolution at high z (“diffusion limit”)
B field greatly reduces the diffusion
=eB/me, = time between collisions (assumed isotropic)
= from ~1 to 15-20 (note Vdrift B/E)
Langevin equation v(E,B) -> ExB effect
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 9
Electrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalancheElectrons in gases : drift, ionization and avalanche
E At high enough fields (5 – 10 kV/cm) electrons acquire enough energy to bounce other electrons out of the atoms, and these electrons also can bounce others, and so on… This is an avalancheavalanche
In a TPC, electrons are extracted from the gas by the high energy particles (100 MeV to GeVs), these electrons drift in an electric field, and arrive in a region of high field where they produce an avalanche.
Wires, Micromegas and GEMs provide these high field regions.
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 10
TPC: Time Projection ChamberTPC: Time Projection Chamber
E
Ionizing Particle
electrons are separated from ions
electrons diffuse and drift due to the E-field
Localization in time and x-y
B
t
x
y
A magnetic field reduces electron diffusion
Micromegas TPC : the amplification is made by a Micromegas
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 11
Micromegas: How does it work?Micromegas: How does it work?
Y. Giomataris, Ph. Rebourgeard, JP Robert and G. Charpak,
NIM A 376 (1996) 29
S1
S2
Micromesh Gaseous Chamber: a micromesh supported by 50-100 m insulating pillars, and held at Vanode – 400 V Multiplication (up to 105 or more) takes place between the anode and the mesh and the charge is collected on the anode (one stageone stage)
Funnel field lines: electron transparencytransparency very close to 1 for thin meshes
Small gap: fastfast collection of ions S2/S1 = Edrift/Eamplif ~ 200/60000= 1/300
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 12
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 13
Small size =>
Fast signals =>
Short recovery time =>
High rate capabilities
micromesh signal
strip signals
A GARFIELD simulation of a
Micromegas avalanche
(Lanzhou university)
Electron and ion signals seen by a fast (current) amplifier
In a TPC, the signals are usually integrated and shaped
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 14
GainGain of Ar mixtures measured with Micromegas (D.Attié, PC, M.Was)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 15
Gain
Compared with the “simple” picture, there are complications :
-due to photon emission (which can re-ionize if the gas is transparent in the UV domain and make photo-electric effect on the mesh). This increases the gain, but causes instabilities. This is avoided by adding a (quencher) gas, usually a polyatomic gas with many degrees of freedom (vibration, rotation) to absorb UVs
-due to molecular effects : molecules of one type can be excited in collisions and the excitation energy can be transferred to a molecule of another type, with sufficiently low ionization potential, which releases it in ionization (Penning effect) :
ee*
e
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 16
Gain uniformity in MicromegasThe nicest property of Micromegas
• Gain (=e d) • Townsend
increases with field• Field decreases with
gap at given V• => there is a
maximum gain for a given gap (about 50 for Ar mixt. and 100 for He mixt.)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 17
Gain stabilityVery good gain stability (G. Puill et al.)
Optimization in progress for CAST
<2% rms over 6 months
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 18
• This leads to excellent energy resolution
11.7 % @ 5.9 keV in P10
That is 5% in r.m.s.
obtained by grids post-processed on silicon substrate. Similar results obtained with Microbulk Micromegas
–with F = 0.14 & Ne = 229 one can estimate the gain fluctuation parameter
Kα escape line
Kβ escape line 13.6 % FWHM
Kβ removed by using a Cr foil
11.7 %
FWHM
Max Chefdeville et al (NIKHEF/Saclay) + Twente Univ.
Gap : 50 μm; Trou, pas : 32 μm, Ø : 14 μm
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 19
Gain uniformity
measurements Y- vs-X 55Fe source illumination
404 / 1726 tested pads
Gain ~ 1000 7% rms@ 5.9 keV
Average resolution = 19% FWHM
AFTER based FEE
2007 MM1_001 prototype
@ 5.9 keV
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 20
Gain uniformityMM1_001 prototype
Inactive pads (Vmesh connection)
55Fe source near module edge
55Fe source near module centre
Gain uniformity within a few %
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 21
MM0_007: gain uniformity
Vmesh = 350V 7.4 % rms @ 5.9 keV
487 / 1726 tested pads
Average resolution = 21% FWHM
@ 5.9 keV
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 22
MM1_002 : gain uniformity and energy resolution
Bopp micromesh
21% FWHM @ 5.9 keV
5.6 1.4 1.4 4.1
4.7 1.0 1.4 3.0
3.9 1.6 0.0 4.4
4.4 0.6 2.8 5.2
4.4 2.8 0.8 3.8
5.8 1.0 2.2 1.9
Measured non-uniformities (%)
RMS = 3.3%
ORTEC amplifier : 12 pads / measurement
AFTER
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 23
Transparency
Gantois Bopp
pitch
(m) 57 63
(m) 19 18
Micromesh
Operation point of MicroMegas detectors in T2K is in the region where high micromesh transparencies are obtained
Collection efficiency reaches a plateau (100%?) at high enough field ratio
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 24
S1
S2
Natural suppression of ion backflowNatural suppression of ion backflowNatural suppression of ion backflowNatural suppression of ion backflow
Electrons are swallowed in the funnel, then make their avalanche, which is spread by diffusion.
The positive ions, created near the anode, will flow back with negligible diffusion (due to their high mass). If the pitch is comparable to the avalanche size, only the fraction S2/S1 = EDRIFT/EAMPLIFICATION will make it to the drift space. Others will be neutralized on the mesh : optimally, the backflow fraction is as low as the field ratio.
This has been experimentally thoroughly verified.
THE SECOND NICEST PROPERTY OF MICROMEGAS
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 25
Hypothesis on the avalanche
Gaussian diffusionPeriodical structure
l2
Avalanche Resolution
Feedback : theory and simulationFeedback : theory and simulationFeedback : theory and simulationFeedback : theory and simulation
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 26
ion backflow calculation
Sum of gaussian diffusions
2D 3D
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 27
Results1500 lpi (sigma/l=0.75)1000 lpi (sigma/l=0.5)500 lpi (sigma/l=0.25)
5.2_
_ ratiofield
feedbackion 03.1_
_ ratiofield
feedbackion 1_
_ ratiofield
feedbackion
Theoretical ion feedback
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 28
Ion backflow (theory)
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
sigma/l
ion
feed
back
Field ratio
Feedback 2D
Feedback 3D
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 29
Ion backflow measurements
Vmesh
Vdrift
I2 (mesh)
I1 (drift)
X-ray gun
Primaries+backflow
I1+I2 ~ G x primaries
One gets the primary ionisation from the drift current at low Vmesh
One eliminates G and the backflow from the 2 equations
The absence of effect of the magnetic field on the ion backflow suppression has been tested up to 2T
P. Colas, I. Giomataris and V. Lepeltier, NIM A 535 (2004) 226
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 30
Ion backflow measurements
A new technique to make perfect meshes with various pitches and gaps has been set up (InGrid at Twente) and allowed the theory to be thoroughly tested (M. Chefdeville et al., Saclay and Nikhef)
rms avalanche sizes are 9.5, 11.6 and 13.4 micron resp. for 45, 58 and 70 micron gaps.
The predicted asymptotic minimum reached about /pitch ~0.5 is observed. Red:data
Blue:calculation
In conclusion, the backflow can be kept at O(1 permil) : does not add to primary ionisation (on average)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 31
Gain and spark rates
95m
128mThreshold = 100nA
The T2K/TPC will be operated at moderate gas gains of about 1000 where spark rates / module are sufficiently low (< 0.1/hour). TPC dead time < 1% achievable.
E. Mazzucato et al., T2K
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 32
Nu
mb
er
of
dis
ch
arg
es
pe
r h
ad
ron
Discharge probability in a hadron beam
D.Thers et al. NIM A 469 (2001 )133
<Z> ~20
<Z> ~10
Ne-C2H6-CF4
gain ~ 104
P = 10-6
<Z> ~14
Note that discharges are not destructive, and can be mitigated by resistive coating
2.5 mm conversion gap 100 µ amplif. gap
Future, pion beam:
-remove CF4
-lower the gain
-increase the gap to compensate
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 33
200 m
MESHESMESHES
ElectroformedChemically
etched Wowen
PILLARSPILLARS
Deposited by vaporization
Laser etching, Plasma etching…
Many different technologies have been developped for making meshes (Back-buymers, CERN, 3M-Purdue, Gantois, Twente…)
Exist in many metals: nickel, copper, stainless steel, Al,… also gold, titanium, nanocristalline copper are possible.
Can be on the mesh (chemical etching) or on the anode (PCB technique with a photoimageable coverlay). Diameter 40 to 400 microns.
Also fishing lines were used (Saclay, Lanzhou)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 34
The Bulk technologyFruit of a CERN-Saclay collaboration (2004)Mesh fixed by the pillars themselves :
No frame needed : fully efficient surfaceVery robust : closed for > 20 µ dustPossibility to fragment the mesh (e.g. in bands)… and to repair it
Used by the T2K TPC under construction
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 35
The Bulk technology
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 36
The T2K TPC has been tested successfully at CERN
(9/2007)
36x34 cm2
1728 pads
Pad pitch 6.9x9 mm2
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 37
T2K TPC (beam test events)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 38
Resistive anode Micromegas• With 2mm x 6mm pads, an ILC-TPC has 1.2 106
channels, with consequences on cost, cooling, material budget…
• 2mm still too wide to give the target resolution (100-130 µm)
Not enough charge sharing, even for 1mm wide pads in the case of Micromégas
avalanche ~12µm)
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 39
Solution ((M.S.Dixit et.al., NIM M.S.Dixit et.al., NIM A518A518 (2004) (2004)
721.721.)) Share the charge Share the charge between several between several neighbouring pads after neighbouring pads after amplification, using a amplification, using a resistive coating on an resistive coating on an insulator. insulator. The charge is spread in The charge is spread in this continuous network of this continuous network of R, CR, C
SIMULATION
MEASUREMENT
M.S.Dixit and A. Rankin NIM A566 (2006) 281M.S.Dixit and A. Rankin NIM A566 (2006) 281
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 40
25 µm mylar with Cermet (1 M25 µm mylar with Cermet (1 M//□□) ) glued onto the pads with 50 µm thick glued onto the pads with 50 µm thick dry adhesivedry adhesive
50 m pillars
Drift Gap
MESHAmplification Gap
Al-Si Cermet on mylar
Cermet selection and gluing technique are essential
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 41
(r,t) integral over pads
(r) Q
mm ns
A point charge being deposited at t=0, r=0, the charge density at (r,t) is a solution of the 2D telegraph equation.
Only one parameter, RC (time per unit surface), links spread in space with time. R~1 M/□ and C~1pF per pad area matches µs signal duration.
t
1
RC
2r2
1
r
r
(r, t) RC
2t
r 2RC
4 te
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 42
Mesh voltage (V)
Another good property of the resistive foil: it prevents charge build-up, thus prevents sparks.
Gains 2 orders of magnitude higher than with standard anodes can be reached.
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 43
• Demonstration with GEM + C-loaded kapton in a X-ray collimated source (M.S.Dixit et.al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A518 (2004) 721)
• Demonstration with Micromegas + C-loaded kapton in a X-ray collimated source (unpublished)
• Cosmic-ray test with GEM + C-loaded kapton (K. Boudjemline et.al.,
to appear in NIM)• Cosmic-ray test with Micromegas + AlSi cermet (A. Bellerive et al.,
in Proc. of LCWS 2005, Stanford)• Beam test and cosmic-ray test in B=1T at KEK, October 2005
Reminder of past results
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 44
The Carleton chamberCarleton-Saclay Micromegas endplate with resistive anode.
128 pads (126 2mmx6mm in 7 rows plus 2 large trigger pads)
Drift length: 15.7 cm
ALEPH preamps + 200 MHz digitizers
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 45
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 46
4 GeV/c + beam, B=1T (KEK)
eff
dx N
zC
22
0
Effect of diffusion: should become negligible at high magnetic field for a high gas
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 47
The 5T cosmic-ray test at DESY
4 weeks of data taking (thanks to DESY and T. Behnke et al.)
Used 2 gas mixtures:
Ar+5% isobutane (easy gas, for reference)
Ar+3% CF4+2% isobutane (so-called T2K gas, good trade-off for safety, velocity, large
Most data taken at 5 T (highest field) and 0.5 T (low enough field to check the effect of diffusion)Note: same foil used since more than a year. Still works
perfectly.
Was ~2 weeks at T=55°C in the magnet: no damage
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 48
The gain is independent of the magnetic field until 5T within 0.5%
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 49
Pad Response Function
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 50
ResidualsResiduals
in z slicesin z slices
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 51
• Resolution = 50 µ independent of the drift distance
Ar+5% isobutane
B=5 T
Analysis:
Curved track fit
P>2 GeV
< 0.05
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 52
Resolution = 50 µ independent of the drift distance
‘T2K gas’
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 53
±20
Average residual vs x position
Before bias correction
After bias correction
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 54
• B=0.5 T• Resolution at 0 distance ~50 µ even at low gain
Gain = 4700 Gain = 2300
Neff=25.2±2.1
Neff=28.8±2.2
At 4 T with this gas, the point resol° is better than 80 µm at z=2m
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 55
Further developments
• Make bulk with resistive foil for application to T2K, LC Large prototype, etc…
• For this, several techniques are available: resistive coatings glued on PCB, serigraphied resistive pastes, photovoltaïc techniques
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 56
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 57
Principle of the digital TPC
+
-
+
-
TimePix chip
Ionizing particle
Gas
volume
amplification system (MPGD)
Cathode
~50 µm
80 kV/cm
Micromegas
Every single ionization electron is detected with an accuracy matching the avalanche size -> maximal information, ultimate resolution
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 58
TimePix/Micromegas
Cage de champ
Capot
MeshMicromeg
as
Puce Medipix2/TimePix
Fenêtre pour sources X
Fenêtre poursource
CERN/Nikhef-Saclay
6 cm
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 59
Timepix chip65000 pixels(500 transistors
each)+ SiProt 20 μm+ Micromegas
55Fe
Ar/Iso (95:5)
Mode Time
z = 25 mm
Vmesh = -340 V
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 60
SiProt: protection against sparksTimepix chip
+ SiProt 20 μm+ Micromegas
Introduce 228Th in the gas to provoke sparks
228Th220Rn
Ar/Iso (80:20)
Mode TOT
z = 10 mm
Vmesh = -420 V
2.5×105 e-
2.7×105 e-
6.3 MeV
6.8 MeV
NIKHEF
Beijing, January 9, 2008 P. Colas - Micromegas TPC 61
SPARKS, but the chip’s still alive
Timepix chip+ SiProt 20 μm+ Micromegas
228Th220Rn
Ar/Iso (80:20)
Mode TOT
z = 10 mm
Vmesh = -420 V
NIKHEF