Microsoft Outlook - Memo Style · 2016 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT Ozark Ridge Landfill, LLC Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill ADEQ Permit No.: 0255‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046

1

Spakes, Rita

From: Matoska, MariaSent: Friday, March 31, 2017 10:24 AMTo: Spakes, Rita; Cusher, AnnetteSubject: FW: Ozark Ridge Class 1 Landfill: 2016 AEIRAttachments: 2016 AEIR ORLF Class 1 Report.pdf

From: Bryan Bailey [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 4:23 PM To: Matoska, Maria Cc: David Conrad ([email protected]); Jodi Taylor ([email protected]); Tim Murray ([email protected])Subject: Ozark Ridge Class 1 Landfill: 2016 AEIR

Attached�is�the�2016�Annual�Engineering�Inspection�Report�for�the�Ozark�Ridge�Class�I�Landfill.��

Thanks,�

Bryan�W.�Bailey,�P.E.��Project�Engineer��

�Shepherd�Engineering�Design�Co.,�Inc.��510�East�Memorial�Road,�Suite�C�1��Oklahoma�City,�OK��73114�

�Mobile:��(405)�249�8609��Fax:��(405)�488�0029�

[email protected]��

��

CONFIDENTIALITY�NOTE:�This�e�mail�and�any�attachments�are�confidential�and�are�protected�by�legal�privilege.��If�you�are�not�the�intended�recipient,�be�aware�that�any�disclosure,�copying,�distribution�or�use�of�this�e�mail�or�any�attachment�is�prohibited.��If�you�have�received�this�e�mail�in�error,�please�notify�us�immediately�by�returning�it�to�the�sender�and�delete�this�copy�from�your�system.��Thank�you�for�your�cooperation.��

Rec’d Digitally

AFIN:_________________________

PMT#:_________________________ SW

DOC ID#:______________________ MD

TO:___________________________

By spakes at 2:48 pm, Mar 31, 2017

75-00046

0225-S1-R5

71419

AC>FILE <RDS

Shepherd Engineering Design Co., Inc.

510 East Memorial Road, Suite C‐1

Oklahoma City, OK 73114

(405) 249‐8609 T | (405) 488‐0029 F | [email protected]

March 30, 2017

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

Solid Waste Division

5301 Northshore Drive

North Little Rock, AR 72118‐5317

Attention: Ms. Maria Matoska

Permit Engineer

RE: Annual Engineering Inspection Report

Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc.

Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill

AFIN No.: 75‐00046 Permit No.: 0225‐S1‐R5

Dear Ms. Matoska:

On behalf of our client, Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc., please find the attached 2016 Annual

Engineering Inspection Report for the Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill as required by ADEQ Solid Waste

Regulation 22.423.

This report covers the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. If you have any

questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

Shepherd Engineering Design Co., Inc.

Bryan W Bailey, P.E.

Project Engineer

Cc: Mr. David Conrad – Market Area Engineer

Mr. Tim Murray – Landfill Manager

Ms. Jodi Taylor – Environmental Protection Manager‐AR

Encl.

2016 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT

Ozark Ridge Landfill, LLC Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill ADEQ Permit No.: 0255‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046 Danville, Yell County, Arkansas Prepared for: Mr. David Conrad Market Area Engineer Waste Management of Arkansas Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill Danville, Yell County, Arkansas Prepared By: Shepherd Engineering Design Co., Inc. 510 East Memorial Road, Suite C‐1 Oklahoma City, OK 73114 SEDCo. Project No.: 17008 March 2017

2016 Annual Engineering SEDCo Inspection Report Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill ADEQ Permit No.: 0225-S1-R5 AFIN: 75-00046

SEDCo Project No.: 17008 March 2017 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS ADEQ ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT FORM……………………………1

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – SITE INSPECTION PHOTOGRAPHS ATTACHMENT B – SITE DRAWINGS ATTACHMENT C – LEACHATE ANALYTICAL REPORT ATTACHMENT D – UPDATED FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ATTACHMENT E – UPDATED CLOSURE PLAN

AEIR Form (Rev. Jan 2013) Page 1 of 6

ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT (AEIR) FORM Reporting Year: 2016 Note: Check applicable landfill class. Class 1 (Reg 22.423(b)) X , Class 3 (22.522(a)) , Class 4 (22.619(b)) Facility Name: Ozark Ridge Landfill AFIN: 75-00046 Permit #: 0225-S1-R5 Landfill Class: 1 Report Submittal Date: 03/30/2017 Date of Landfill Site Inspection by Certifying Engineer: 03/7/2017

Complete the form as indicated Instructions are bolded and italicized.

COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY REPORTER

Item Regulation Reference

Item Description Report Information/Comments/Remarks Attachment Reference

1 22.423(b)(1) 22.522(a)(1) 22.619(b)(1)

Remaining volume in current cell.

a) 362,350 cubic yards

B

Projected date of opening new cell. b) Date: Summer 2018 Cell 4

2 22.423(b)(2) 22.522(a)(2) 22.619(b)(2)

Remaining volume of all permitted units. a) 4,682,825 cubic yards

Total air space used during the reporting period.

b) 150,853.2 cubic yards B

Estimated remaining site life (years) based on utilization rate during the reporting period. Note: Itemize current permitted unit/cell information - use attachment if necessary.

c) Landfill Unit/Cell remaining life: Landfill unit/cell Phase 4 , 0.3 years. Landfill unit/cell Cell 2 , 1.2 years. Landfill unit/cell Cell 3 , 0.9 years.

Landfill unit/cell , years. d) Entire permitted landfill: 31.04 years remaining life.

B

3 22.423(b)(3) 22.522(a)(3) 22.619(b)(3)

Documentation of fill progression in compliance with permit plans, specs and operating plan and narrative. Note: Provide narrative regarding fill progression during the reporting period. Be specific about landfill unit/cell designations (example: Cell 1, Phase A completely filled; Cell 2, Phase A, 50% full, being filled south to north as of December 31). Specifically note any overfill conditions.

a) Progression narrative: Approximately 50.89 acres of the permitted 66-acres are currently prepared for waste disposal. The prepared area includes Phase 1-4, Phase 1A and Cells 2 and 3. Most of the waste was placed in Cells 2 and 3 and Phase 4 during the reporting period. An area of Phase 1, 1A, and 2 received waste during a portion of the reporting period along the north top of slope. Based on review of the permit application the landfill appears to be following permitted fill progression.

B


4 22.423(b)(4) 22.522(a)(4) 22.619(b)(4)

Documentation of compliance with regulatory operating requirements, permit conditions, approved operating plan, and other applicable regulations. Note: Review current operating plans, and permit conditions. Include photographs of engineer’s inspection as Attachment A. Check for weekly/monthly operational logs, waste volume records in and out of landfill, unauthorized waste form sheets, waste cover maintenance, stormwater reports to ADEQ, and wet weather repair information.

a) Weekly/monthly operational logs exist (Y/N)? Y b) Photos of AEIR inspection attached (Y/N)? Y c) Waste volume in and out records exist (Y/N)? Y d) Unauthorized waste forms exist (Y/N)? Y e) Daily/weekly cover adequate at time of inspection (Y/N)? Y f) Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Plan located onsite (Y/N)? Y Operations in compliance with ADC Plan (Y/N)? Y g) Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Plan located onsite (Y/N)? Y Operations in compliance with LWM Plan (Y/N)? Y h) Liquids received to be bulked during reporting period: 0 gallons 0 tons i) Waste cover of inactive areas maintained adequately (Y/N)? Y j) Net amount of waste disposed in landfill during reporting period: cubic yards 96,841.18 tons k) Leachate head level less than 1' on liner at time of inspection (Y/N)? Y

A

5 22.423(b)(5) 22.522(a)(5) 22.619(b)(5)

Updated contour map that depicts: Note: Provide updated drawing(s) and final cover permit drawing as Attachment B – discuss any discrepancies. Max. contour interval = 2 feet)

a) Updated contour drawing attached (Y/N)? Y b) Final cover permit drawing attached (Y/N)? Y c) List all discrepancies here: N/A_ d) Is there an overfill condition (Y/N)? N

B

(i) horizontal and vertical extent of active and inactive fill areas;

(ii) status of all permitted units/cells; (Note: Label all active (working face, bulking area,

stockpiles), inactive, closed and interim cover areas).

a) Currently, does the facility have sufficient on-site quantities and types of soils for liner and cover construction of permitted units/cells (Y/N)? Y

b) If not, where will deficiency shortfalls be obtained (be specific)? c) Is the current Design Narrative earthwork balance accurate (Y/N)? Y

(iii) survey grid (required by 22.426); Note: Include benchmarks and horizontal controls

(iv) location of other visible surface features or improvements (e.g., roads, buildings, gas control systems, etc.);

Note: Include leachate risers, manholes, monitoring wells, gas wells, etc.

(v) the person responsible for gathering the survey data and the date survey data was taken to prepare the map. Reminder: Reporting period is calendar year. Survey data should be collected to reflect the AEIR reporting period.

a) Name: Southern Resources Mapping Corporation b) Name of person using the data to produce contour map: Brad Matthews, P.E. c) Date survey data was collected: December 20, 2016


6 22.423(b)(6) 22.522(a)(6) 22.619(b)(6)

Quantity, location, and characteristics of leachate collected, recirculated, and disposed. Note: Provide analytical report as Attachment C. Provide brief narrative on this form in space provided about leachate sources, how leachate is collected, measured and disposed. Also, explain how the leachate head on the landfill liner is monitored and measured.

a) Leachate Collected: _5,716,578 gallons b) Leachate Disposed: _2,029,868 gallons c) Leachate Recirculated: _3,686,710 gallons d) Leachate Recirculation Plan exists (Y/N)? Y ADEQ approval Doc # 49662;50375;50530;50543;50546 e) Leachate operating records exist (Y/N)? Y f) Leachate analytical report attached (Y/N)? Y g) Leachate narrative (collection, measurements and disposal): Leachate is collected from cells and conveyed to above ground storage tanks for temporary storage. As listed above, a portion of the stored leachate is recirculated back into the landfill, and the remaining leachate is hauled off and disposed at an off-site waste water treatment facility h) Leachate narrative (verifying <1' head on liner system): The leachate sump pumps are equipped with pressure transducers to automatically control the pump operation at set head levels. The head levels are displayed on the control panels and are recorded by ORLF staff.

C

7 22.423(b)(7) 22.522(a)(7) 22.619(b)(7)

Maintenance of stormwater controls and best management practices for erosion control. Note: List any upset conditions during the reporting period (i.e., washouts, etc…). Also, include narrative about vegetation maintenance and repair.

a) Briefly list maintenance activities and upset conditions here: Prior to any offsite discharge, storm water is diverted to on-site sedimentation basins via drainage berms, letdowns and perimeter ditches. Perimeter ditches, drainage berms and letdowns in place are functional and maintained. During the reporting period, typical silt removal maintenance was performed on ditches. Some perimeter ditches lack sufficient vegetation from winter maintenance, however seeding efforts are to be completed this spring. There is a good stand of vegetative cover around inactive areas. The north slope of Phase 1A, Phase 1 and Phase 2 has 3-4 patches that lacks vegetative cover due to leachate seep repairs. Additionally, the south slope of Cells 2 and 3 lack vegetative cover due to current filling operations.

8 22.423(b)(8)

22.619(b)(8)

Status of capping and closure of completed areas. Note: List areas with acreage that have received interim or final cover. Include total landfilled area acreage not yet under final certified closed cover. Note: "Certified closed" means the facility has received an approval letter from ADEQ accepting the engineer's closure certification report.

a) Lndfl unit/cell _Phase 1 and 3 , 10.0 acres. Intrm or Final Cover (I/F): F

b) Lndfl unit/cell _Phase 2,4 and 1A , 30.0 acres. Intrm or Final Cover (I/F): I

c) Lndfl unit/cell _ Cell 2 , 6.47 acres. Intrm or Final Cover (I/F): I

d) Lndfl unit/cell Cell 3 , 4.42 acres. Intrm or Final Cover (I/F): I

e) Acres of disposed waste not under final certified cover: 40.89 acres f) Acres of disposed waste area that have interim cover: 40.89 acres


9 22.423(b)(9) 22.522(a)(8) 22.619(b)(9)

Status of remedial or corrective action activities. Note: List corrective action events during reporting period (e.g., seeps and erosion correction, leachate spills, unauthorized waste handling and removal, etc…), and indicate whether action was taken in response to an ADEQ inspection.

a) Briefly list corrective actions events here: During the reporting period, ADEQ quarterly inspection comments were made: (1) Actively flowing leachate leaks were noted in Phase 1A; (2) Actively flowing leachate leak was noted in Cell 3; Leachate was above 12 inches of head according to the read outs for Cells 1A, Cell 2 and Cell 3; Exposed waste was noted protruding from the cover material in Cell 1A; (3) no licensed on-site operator present on day of inspection; Lack of BMP on western slope of Cell 3. The ineffective surface water controls allowed waste to be transported into storm water drainage ditch on western slope of cell, which is off the lined portion of landfill; Actively flowing leachate leak with methane bubbling was noted inactive area of Phase 3; Leachate was above 12 inches of head according to the read outs (and alarms) for all cells. Compliance in each cell would be 36.0; Exposed waste was noted protruding from the cover material in current cell and on top of Phase 3; (4) Standing/pooling stormwater was noted at the southeast portion of active Cell 2.

b) Were any of the corrective actions taken in response to an ADEQ inspection (Y/N)? Y

c) Current status of corrective actions: All identified leachate seeps were corrected after each inspection. During the reporting period, leachate seeps have emerged and ORLF has worked on repairing the seeps. ORLF placed soil plugs over leachate seeps as a wet-weather repair. The seeps were then trenched and tied into the existing French drain systems, which were constructed in 2015 (north slope) and 2016 (west slope of Cell 3). In a few instances when leachate head was more than 12 inches, leachate was hauled to City of Little Rock Wastewater facility for disposal.

d) Did corrective actions permanently solve the conditions (Y/N)? Y Explain briefly: Installed additional daily cover and interim cover, also repaired sideslopes when waste was exposed due to erosion. ORLF has increased transportation of leachate offsite until the leachate seeps have been corrected, during this time the site has continued to manage the seeps as well as placing soil plugs over leachate seeps for temporary repairs and then trenching to tie into existing French drain systems.

10 22.423(b)(10) 22.522(a)(9)

22.619(b)(10)

Updated Financial Assurance documentation as required by Chapter 14. Note: Include copy of most recent financial assurance documentation as Attachment D. Also, include updated closure and post closure cost estimated as an attachment– recommend to use the Closure Costs and Post-closure Care Costs Worksheet located at ADEQ - Solid Waste - Technical Branch Home Page Specific links to the worksheets: http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/solwaste/branch_technical/

a) Size of the facility property under current permit? 445 acres b) Size of actual permitted disposal area? 66 acres c) What is the current total permitted disposal area that contains disposed

waste but is not certified closed? 40.89 acres d) Updated closure cost estimate amount: $ $3,360,178.00 e) Is the closure cost estimate based on the largest area ever requiring

closure (Y/N)? Y f) Is the existing closure financial assurance adequate for acreage not yet

certified closed (Y/N)?: Y g) Updated post closure care cost estimate amount: $ 6,455,422.00_

D


pdfs/closure_costs_worksheet.xlsx and http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/solwaste/branch_technical/pdfs/post_closure_care_costs_worksheet.xlsx. . Show detailed calculations of cost items in tabular format with specific item breakdowns. Also, show source of unit cost information and/or inflationary factor adjustments – use ADEQ factors where applicable. If updated unit cost information is used instead of inflationary factors, show the source of unit cost information. Confirm estimates are based on largest area ever requiring final cover.

h) Is the existing post closure care financial assurance adequate for all permitted areas (Y/N)?: Y

i) Is the financial assurance mechanism a trust fund (Y/N)? N j) Are the sources of information for updated unit cost line items shown on

the cost estimate calculations (Y/N?): Y k) Do the unit cost items for soil cover material include actual third party

cost of materials and labor (Y/N)? Y

11 22.423(b)(11) 22.522(a)(10) 22.619(b)(11)

Revised or updated facility Closure Plan in accordance with Chapter 13. Note: Provide updated Closure Plan as Attachment E if facility obtained a permit modification during the reporting period that affects the closure and/or post closure care.

a) Was an updated Closure Plan required during this reporting period (Y/N)?: Y b) Is an updated Closure Plan attached herein (Y/N)? Y Please Note: Updated Closure Plan submitted 6/30/16 (ADEQ # 69867) and approved 7/8/16 (69878)

E

12 22.423(b)(12) 22.522(a)(11) 22.619(b)(12)

Other items that affect compliance. Note: Include an ADEQ enforcement activity summary (solid waste, water, air, hazardous waste related) and, status of operating and permit fees. Also, include brief narrative concerning groundwater monitoring reports, landfill gas, leachate recirculation, alternate daily cover, etc…

a) Are there current ADEQ enforcement actions (Y/N)? N b) Summary of enforcement actions: c) Are operating and permit fees payments up-to-date (Y/N)? Y If not explain: Additional Information: d) Does the facility monitor groundwater (Y/N)?: Y If so, is it detection monitoring or assessment monitoring?: Detection Monitoring e) What is the groundwater analytical sampling frequency? 12 months f) Does the facility collect landfill gas (Y/N)?: Y g) Does the facility have a Gas Monitoring Plan (Y/N)? Y h) Does the facility have gas monitoring probes (Y/N)? Y i) Does the facility use an alternate daily cover (ADC) (Y/N)? Y If so, what type of ADC is used: Synthetic Tarps If so, list document id# approving ADC: 12010 j) Does the facility have a Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Plan (Y/N)? _Y If so, list document id# approving the LWM Plan: 70610_ k) Date and document id # of currently approved Operating Plan and Narrative: Date: September 2015 Doc#: 68237 l) Date and document id # for currently approved Closure/ Post Closure Plan: Date: July 2016 Doc#: 69867 m) Date and document id # of currently approved Permit Drawings: Date: October 2002 Doc#: 18574 n) Date and document id # of currently approved Design Narrative: Date: October 2002 Doc#: 18574

SEDCo 2016 Annual Engineering Inspection Report Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill ADEQ Permit No.: 0225-S1-R5 AFIN: 75-00046

SEDCo Project No.: 17008 March 2017

ATTACHMENT A SITE INSPECTION PHOTOGRAPHS


SEDCo Project No.: 17008 March 2017 1

Picture 1: Tipping Face in South Area of Cells 2 and 3 at

Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill (daily cover tarp laying in forefront of operating face)

Picture 2: South Slope of Phase 3 and Cell 1A at Ozark Ridge Landfill



Picture 3: Along the North Slope of Phase 1 and Phase 2

Picture 4: Headwall, Sump Controls and Head Level Indicators for Cell 3



Picture 5: South Slope of Cells 2 and 3 Ozark Ridge Landfill

Picture 6: West Slope of Cell 3 Ozark Ridge Landfill



Picture 7: Hauling and Disposal of Leachate from Storage Tanks

at Ozark Ridge Landfill



ATTACHMENT B SITE DRAWINGS

SCALE

388.2

409.9

400.7

367.1

342.6

350.5

351.7

353.5

374.2

354.8

321.9

329.1

336.4

327.6

329.3 3

65.9

384.4

385.6

386.4

357.2355.5

348.4

353.8

329.4

329.7

328.7

STORAGE AREA

409.6409.5409.4

329.7

329.8

364.5

364.3

362.3

385.6

378.9

384.8 391.0

410.8

364.5

365.0

322.1

369.7

355.0

377.4

402.7

399.1

404.6

407.2

404.9

411.3 413.4410.6 412.5

412.9

409.9

412.4

390.2

397.1

397.1

401.2

404.9

408.1

407.2

406.5

409.0

414.5

427.0

426.5434.2

431.6

432.8

435.1

390.2

429.8

424.54

21.2

419.5

407.0

386.9

373.0372.9

377.

0

371.7

400.1

382.5

331.2

460.6

456.6

457.1

456.3

438.2

434.7

435.0

428.8

422.6

369.3

STORAGE AREASTORAGE AREA

104

343.40105

332.87

110

345.60

W\E

W\E

W\E

W\E

320

330

340

340

350

350

360

360

360

370

370

370

370

370

370

380

380

380

380

380

390

390

390

390

390

390

390

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

410

410

410

410

420

420

420

420

420

420

430

430

430

440

440

334

340

350

360

370

350

360

360

370

380

386

356

330

330

320

360 370

380

380

382

360

370

380

364

364

360

330

460

458

456

450

410

370

380

390

400410

420

440

450

440

430

410

400

464

330328

340

350

360

342

352

350

366

396

406

404

400

432

430

434

432

428

420

410

450

460380

400

404

390

402

412

410

390

400

410

406

410

410

410 408

400

330

320

320

350

360

R

EVENTS UPON COMPLETION OF THE PURPOSE OF THE LOAN.

PROPERTY OF WM. IT IS TO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST AND IN ALL

DOCUMENT IS LOANED FOR LIMITED PURPOSES ONLY, AND REMAINS THE

CONTRACTOR OR AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY WM. THIS

DISCLOSURE OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE ONLY AS PROVIDED BY

CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET INFORMATION OF WM. REPRODUCTION,

OF WASTE MANAGEMENT ("WM"). THIS DOCUMENT IS, AND CONTAINS,

THIS DOCUMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Approved By:

Date:

Scale:

Drawing No.

As Shown Sheet Number:No.

RevisionsDescription Date By

Project Location:

CENTERVILLE, ARKANSAS

OZARK RIDGE LANDFILLDavid Conrad

David Conrad

Bullseye Design Services January 2017

0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100

279000

95

05

00

95

3000

277500

950500

279000

PHASE 1

ACTIVE

PHASE 3

INACTIVE

ACTIVE

PHASE 4

FUTURE

CELL 4CELL 5

FUTURE

1A

PH

ASE

AC

TIV

E

PHASE 1B

CELL 2

IN PLACE (6.5 ACRES)

2 FT. FINAL COVERIN PLACE (3.5 ACRES)

2 FT. FINAL COVER

(EXPANSION)

LANDFILL FOOTPRINT

APPROXIMATE

INACTIVE

PHASE 2

CELL 3

FUTURE

ACTIVE ACTIVE

0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100AR02-0099-AIR-01

1DECEMBER 18, 20152016 TOPOGRAPHY DATED

AR02A17_12-20-16.DGN 1/3/2017 2:23:28 PM

SCALE

388.2

409.9

342.6

350.5

351.7

374.2

354.8

321.9

329.1

336.4

327.6

329.3 365.9

384.4

385.6

386.4

348.4

353.8

329.4

329.7

328.7

STORAGE AREA

409.6409.5409.4

329.8

364.5

364.3

362.3

385.6

378.9

358.9

410.8

365.3

355.0

412.9

390.2

369.3

STORAGE AREA

STORAGE AREA

105

332.87

110

345.60

346.7

355.1

380.7

372.3

380.7

398.6

404.5

404.3

402.7

402.5

410.7412.9

409.9

398.1

398.5

388.9

434.1

430.4

436.3

413.1

409.7

394.5390.7

375.3

370.8

372.2

377.3

330.6

329.3

330.1

380.4

426.3

415.0

435.5

439.7

442.4

441.5

443.8

444.8

436.7436.2

438.9437.1

435.4

436.6

436.2

439.4

435.3

428.6

439.2

433.0

429.1

366.9

458.9

455.1

456.3

456.1

451.5

442.4

396.6

422.5

361.1

372.2

323.2

STORAGE AREA

W\E

W\E

W\E

320

330

330

340

340

350

350

350

360

360

360

360

370

370

370

370

380

380

380

380

390

390

390

390

400

400

400

400

400 400

410410

410

410

410

410

420

420

420

430

430

430

430

430

440

440

334

330

320

340

330

340

324

324

342

340

350360

360

370

380

380

370

360

360

356

364

364

362

364

370

380

390

400

410

420

440

460

460

450

440

430

410

400

464

358

322

318

382

380

380

370

390

380

420

386

400

450

452

458

422

420

400390

320

350

330 350

352

370

360

380

366

380

434

438 434

434434

432

434

456

420

350

320316

360

350

370

402

390

400

410

404402 406 408

410

R









Drawn By:

Checked By:

Approved By:

Date:

Scale:

Drawing No.



Project Location:



David Conrad


0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100

279000

95

05

00

95

3000

277500

950500

279000

PHASE 1

ACTIVE

PHASE 3

INACTIVE

ACTIVE

PHASE 4

FUTURE

CELL 4CELL 5

FUTURE

1A

PH

ASE

AC

TIV

E

PHASE 1B

CELL 2



2 FT. FINAL COVER

(EXPANSION)

LANDFILL FOOTPRINT

APPROXIMATE

INACTIVE

PHASE 2

CELL 3

FUTURE

ACTIVE ACTIVE

0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100AR02-0099-AIR-02

2DECEMBER 20, 20162017 TOPOGRAPHY DATED

AR02A17_12-20-16.DGN 1/3/2017 2:38:46 PM

555

550

545540

535530

525520

515510

500

495490

485

475470

465460

455450

505

445440

435430

425420

415410

405410

415420

425430

435440

445450

455460

465470

475480

485490

495500

510

515520

525530

535540

545550

505

510

545

535

525

515

540

530

520

425

505

495

485

475

465

455

445

435

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

415

405

420

410

400

330

335

340

345

350

355

360

365

370

375

380

385

390

395

510

545

535

525

515

550

540

530

520

425

505

495

485

475

465

455

445

435

500

490

480

470

460

450

440

430

415

405

420

410

400

370

375

380

385

390

3954:1

4:1

4:1

4:1

5%

5%

5%5%

3:1

380

388.2

374.2

354.8

321.9

329.1

327.6

329.3 3

65.9

384.4

385.6

386.4

357.2355.5

348.4

353.8

329.4

329.7

328.7

STORAGE AREA

329.7

329.8

364.5

364.3

362.3

385.6

378.9

322.1

369.7

355.0

377.4

412.9

390.2

369.3

104

343.40105

332.87

W\E

W\E

320

330

340

370

370

380

390

400

420

334

340

350

360

370

350

360

360

370

380

386

356

330

330

320

360 370

380

382

360

370

380

364

364

360

330 370

380

390

400410

420

440

450

440

430

410

400

464

450

460

400

320

320

350

360

R









Drawn By:

Checked By:

Approved By:

Date:

Scale:

Drawing No.



Project Location:



David Conrad


0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100

279000

95

05

00

95

3000

277500

950500

279000

PHASE 1

ACTIVE

PHASE 3

INACTIVE

ACTIVE

PHASE 4

FUTURE

CELL 4CELL 5

FUTURE

1A

PH

ASE

AC

TIV

E

PHASE 1B

CELL 2



2 FT. FINAL COVER

(EXPANSION)

LANDFILL FOOTPRINT

APPROXIMATE

INACTIVE

PHASE 2

CELL 3

FUTURE

ACTIVE ACTIVE

0

SCALE 1" = 200'

200100100AR02-0099-AIR-03

3PERMITTED FINAL GRADES

AR02A17_12-20-16.DGN 1/3/2017 3:10:56 PM

CALCULATION SUMMARY SHEET PROJECT:

Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill – Annual Engineering Inspection Report

CALCULATION TITLE: PROJECT NO: Landfill Utilization Rate 17008

ORIGINATED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: Page No.:

Bryan W Bailey, P.E. March 13, 2017 Jeff A. Shepherd, P.E. March 21, 2017 1 of 1

SUBJECT: Determine the remaining useful life of the landfill by finding the current utilization rate. SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS: Landfill Airspace Consumed between Survey Dates: 151,670 CY (from topographic map produced by surveyor on December 20, 2016) Time between survey dates (December 18, 2015 and December 20, 2016): 12.065 months Landfill Utilization Rate = 151,670 CY / 12.065 months = 12,571.1 CY/Month = 12,571.1 CY/Month x 12 months = 150,853.2 CY/YR Airspace remaining in constructed areas: 362,350 CY (from topographic map produced by surveyor on December 20, 2016) 362,350 CY / 12,571.1 CY/Month = 28.82 months or 2.40 years in the constructed area Permitted Capacity Remaining = 4,682,825 CY 4,682,825 CY / 12,571.1 CY/Month = 372.51 months or 31.04 years



ATTACHMENT C LEACHATE ANALYTICAL REPORT

ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Denver4955 Yarrow StreetArvada, CO 80002Tel: (303)736-0100

TestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client Project/Site: AR02|Ozark RidgeSampling Event: Annual Event GW - Jul

For:Waste Management100 Two Pine DriveNorth Little Rock, Arkansas 72117-1583

Attn: Jodi Taylor

Authorized for release by:8/4/2016 3:29:29 PM

Danielle Harrington, Project Manager II(303)[email protected]

The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accreditedparameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Managerat the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx

http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm

http://www.testamericainc.com

mailto:[email protected]

Table of Contents

Client: Waste ManagementProject/Site: AR02|Ozark Ridge

TestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1

Page 2 of 45TestAmerica Denver

8/4/2016

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management

Project/Site: AR02|Ozark Ridge

Qualifiers

Metals

Qualifier Description

4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not

applicable.

Qualifier

J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

B Compound was found in the blank and sample.

General Chemistry

Qualifier Description

J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

Qualifier

B Compound was found in the blank and sample.

F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits.

Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CFL Contains Free Liquid

CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Denver

Page 3 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Case NarrativeClient: Waste Management TestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Project/Site: AR02|Ozark Ridge

Job ID: 280-85669-1

Laboratory: TestAmerica Denver

Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE

Client: Waste Management

Project: AR02|Ozark Ridge

Report Number: 280-85669-1

With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of

the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.

This report may include reporting limits (RLs) less than TestAmerica’s standard reporting limit. The reported sample results and

associated reporting limits are being used specifically to meet the needs of this project. Note that data are not normally reported to these levels without qualification because they are inherently less reliable and potentially less defensible than required by the latest industry standards.

This submission may contain field data obtained by the sampler. The methods referenced in this submission for the field data results

may not be the methods used to obtain the field data by the sampler.

RECEIPTThese samples were received on 07/14/2016 with cooler temperature of were 0.4º C, 0.6º C and 1.6º C.

Please note, custody seal was not intact and there was no tape on one cooler. Nothing appeared to be compromised. Two Trip Blanks were received and listed on the chain of custody. As no volatile organics are performed for the associated samples, the trip blanks were not logged. Client was notified on 07/17/2016.

All other sample bottles were received in acceptable condition.

HOLDING TIMES

All Holding Times were met.

METHOD BLANKS

Low levels of Cadmium are present in the method blank associated with QC batch 280-335822. Because the concentration in the method blank is not present at a level greater than the reporting limit, corrective action is deemed unnecessary.

Low levels of Chloride and Sulfate are present in the method blank associated with QC batch 280-335338. Because the concentration in the method blank is not present at a level greater than the reporting limit, corrective action is deemed unnecessary.

Low levels of Total Alkalinity and Carbonate Alkalinity are present in the method blank associated with QC batch 280-334644. Because

the concentration in the method blank is not present at a level greater than the reporting limit, corrective action is deemed unnecessary.

All other Method Blanks were within the acceptance limits.

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES (LCS)All Laboratory Control Samples were within the acceptance limits.

MATRIX SPIKE (MS) and MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES (MSD)

TestAmerica DenverPage 4 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Case NarrativeClient: Waste Management TestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Project/Site: AR02|Ozark Ridge

Job ID: 280-85669-1 (Continued)

Laboratory: TestAmerica Denver (Continued)

The accuracy and precision of the Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium, and Iron MS/MSD performed on a laboratory

generated sample could not be reliably evaluated, as the concentrations present in the parent sample were 4 times greater than the matrix spike concentration. The acceptable LCS analysis data indicated that the analytical system was operating within control; therefore,

corrective action is deemed unnecessary.

Laboratory generated sample analysis data have been provided. The MS/MSD for Chemical Oxygen Demand method 410.4 exhibited

spike compound recoveries outside the QC limits. Method precision and accuracy have been verified by the acceptable LCS/LCSD analysis data; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary.

All other Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicates were within the acceptance limits.

METALSContinuing Calibration Blank (CCB) associated with samples in Manganese batch 280-335822 exhibited detection greater than ½ half the

reporting limit. This is an indicator that data may be biased high. As no detectable concentrations of Manganese are present in the

associated samples above the reporting limit or the results are 10X the result found in the CCB, corrective action is deemed unnecessary.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Client Sample ID: MW-3 Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-1

Depth to water

NONE

ft

NONEAnalyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA15.64 Field Sampling

Field pH SU Total/NA16.87 Field Sampling

Field Conductivity umhos/cm Total/NA11128 Field Sampling

Field Temperature Degrees C Total/NA117.2 Field Sampling

Field Turbidity NTU Total/NA10.47 Field Sampling

Field Dissolved Oxygen mg/L Total/NA11.60 Field Sampling

Field EH/ORP millivolts Total/NA1258.1 Field Sampling

Cadmium

RL

5.0 ug/L

MDL

0.45

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total

Recoverable

1J B0.95 6010B

Calcium 200 ug/L35 Total

Recoverable

167000 6010B

Magnesium 200 ug/L11 Total

Recoverable

176000 6010B

Manganese 3.0 ug/L0.25 Total

Recoverable

1310 6010B

Potassium 3000 ug/L240 Total

Recoverable

1900 J 6010B

Sodium 5000 ug/L92 Total

Recoverable

166000 6010B

Nickel 4.0 ug/L0.30 Total

Recoverable

11.7 J 6020

Chloride 0.60 mg/L0.25 Total/NA1190 B 300.0

Sulfate 5.0 mg/L0.23 Total/NA1120 B 300.0

Ammonia as N 0.10 mg/L0.022 Total/NA10.029 J 350.1

TOC Result 1 1.0 mg/L0.16 Total/NA10.93 J 9060


Total Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA1260 SM 2320B

Bicarbonate Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA1260 SM 2320B

Client Sample ID: MW-4 Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-2

Depth to water

NONE

ft









Cadmium

RL

5.0 ug/L

MDL

0.45


Total

Recoverable

1J B0.80 6010B


Recoverable

184000 6010B

Cobalt 5.0 ug/L1.2 Total

Recoverable

18.5 6010B

Iron 50 ug/L22 Total

Recoverable

11500 6010B


Recoverable

151000 6010B


Recoverable

1490 6010B

TestAmerica Denver

This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.

Page 6 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Client Sample ID: MW-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-2

Potassium

RL

3000 ug/L

MDL

240


Total

Recoverable

1J1300 6010B


Recoverable

132000 6010B

Zinc 20 ug/L4.5 Total

Recoverable

111 J 6010B

Arsenic 10 ug/L0.33 Total

Recoverable

11.7 J 6020


Recoverable

18.4 6020



Ammonia as N 0.10 mg/L0.022 Total/NA10.17 350.1

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 10 mg/L4.1 Total/NA111 410.4

TOC Result 1 1.0 mg/L0.16 Total/NA14.3 9060

TOC Result 2 1.0 mg/L0.16 Total/NA14.4 9060



Client Sample ID: MW-11R Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-3

Depth to water

NONE

ft









Cadmium

RL

5.0 ug/L

MDL

0.45


Total

Recoverable

1J B0.63 6010B


Recoverable

128000 6010B


Recoverable

1980 6010B


Recoverable

122000 6010B


Recoverable

1160 6010B


Recoverable

1600 J 6010B


Recoverable

184000 6010B


Recoverable

10.33 J 6020








TestAmerica Denver


Page 7 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Client Sample ID: DUP Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-4

Calcium

RL

200 ug/L

MDL

35


Total

Recoverable

128000 6010B


Recoverable

1870 6010B


Recoverable

122000 6010B


Recoverable

1160 6010B


Recoverable

1640 J 6010B


Recoverable

183000 6010B








Client Sample ID: 01FB Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-5

Calcium

RL

200 ug/L

MDL

35


Total

Recoverable

1J63 6010B


Recoverable

150 J 6010B


Recoverable

10.25 J 6010B


Recoverable

1260 J 6010B

Chloride 0.60 mg/L0.25 Total/NA11.8 B 300.0

Sulfate 5.0 mg/L0.23 Total/NA10.53 J B 300.0




Total Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA11.3 J SM 2320B

Bicarbonate Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA11.3 J SM 2320B

Client Sample ID: EB Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-6

Nickel

RL

4.0 ug/L

MDL

0.30


Total

Recoverable

1J0.37 6020

Chloride 0.60 mg/L0.25 Total/NA10.47 J B 300.0





Depth to water

NONE

ft



TestAmerica Denver


Page 8 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Client Sample ID: MW-10R (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-7

Field pH

NONE

SU








Calcium

RL

200 ug/L

MDL

35


Total

Recoverable

119000 6010B


Recoverable

13200 6010B


Recoverable

116000 6010B


Recoverable

1410 6010B


Recoverable

111000 6010B


Recoverable

10.73 J 6020









Depth to water

NONE

ft









Calcium

RL

200 ug/L

MDL

35


Total

Recoverable

119000 6010B


Recoverable

12600 6010B


Recoverable

117000 6010B


Recoverable

1290 6010B


Recoverable

1440 J 6010B


Recoverable

179000 6010B


Recoverable

10.56 J 6020


TestAmerica Denver


Page 9 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Client Sample ID: MW-12R (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-8

Sulfate

RL

5.0 mg/L

MDL

0.23


Total/NA1B12 300.0






Client Sample ID: Leachate- Composite Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-9

Field pH

NONE

SU






Cadmium

RL

5.0 ug/L

MDL

0.45


Total

Recoverable

1J B1.2 6010B


Recoverable

173000 6010B

Chromium 10 ug/L0.66 Total

Recoverable

167 6010B

Cobalt 5.0 ug/L1.2 Total

Recoverable

149 6010B


Recoverable

111000 6010B


Recoverable

1150000 6010B


Recoverable

1370 6010B


Recoverable

1380000 6010B


Recoverable

11400000 6010B

Zinc 20 ug/L4.5 Total

Recoverable

153 6010B


Recoverable

1100 6020


Recoverable

1330 6020

Chloride 60 mg/L25 Total/NA1001900 B 300.0

Sulfate 25 mg/L1.2 Total/NA57.9 J B 300.0

Ammonia as N 20 mg/L4.4 Total/NA200850 350.1

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 200 mg/L81 Total/NA201000 410.4

TOC Result 1 20 mg/L3.1 Total/NA20320 9060

TOC Result 2 20 mg/L3.1 Total/NA20320 9060

Total Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA14600 B SM 2320B

Bicarbonate Alkalinity 5.0 mg/L1.1 Total/NA14600 B SM 2320B

TestAmerica Denver


Page 10 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol

SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL DEN

SW8466020 Metals (ICP/MS) TAL DEN

MCAWW300.0 Anions, Ion Chromatography TAL DEN

MCAWW350.1 Nitrogen, Ammonia TAL DEN

MCAWW410.4 COD TAL DEN

SW8469060 Organic Carbon, Total (TOC) TAL DEN

SMSM 2320B Alkalinity TAL DEN

EPAField Sampling Field Sampling TAL DEN

Protocol References:

EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency

MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.

SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater",

SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.

Laboratory References:

TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100

TestAmerica Denver

Page 11 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

280-85669-1 MW-3 Water 07/13/16 08:14 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-2 MW-4 Water 07/13/16 08:42 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-3 MW-11R Water 07/13/16 09:15 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-4 DUP Water 07/13/16 09:20 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-5 01FB Water 07/13/16 09:25 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-6 EB Water 07/13/16 09:30 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-7 MW-10R Water 07/13/16 10:20 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-8 MW-12R Water 07/13/16 11:10 07/14/16 09:25

280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Water 07/13/16 11:30 07/14/16 09:25

TestAmerica Denver

Page 12 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-1Client Sample ID: MW-3Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 08:14

Date Received: 07/14/16 09:25RL MDL

Cadmium 0.95 J B 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Calcium 67000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:43 1Iron ND

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Magnesium 76000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Manganese 310

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Potassium 900 J

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:19 1Sodium 66000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:43 1Zinc ND



Cadmium 0.80 J B 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Calcium 84000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Cobalt 8.5

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:46 1Iron 1500

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Magnesium 51000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Manganese 490

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Potassium 1300 J

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:22 1Sodium 32000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:46 1Zinc 11 J

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-3Client Sample ID: MW-11RMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:15


Cadmium 0.63 J B 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Calcium 28000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:48 1Iron 980

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Magnesium 22000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Manganese 160

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Potassium 600 J

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:25 1Sodium 84000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:48 1Zinc ND

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-4Client Sample ID: DUPMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:20


Cadmium ND 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Calcium 28000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:51 1Iron 870

TestAmerica Denver

Page 13 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued)



Magnesium 22000 200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1


3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Manganese 160

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Potassium 640 J

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:27 1Sodium 83000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:51 1Zinc ND

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-5Client Sample ID: 01FBMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:25


Cadmium ND 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Calcium 63 J

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:53 1Iron ND

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Magnesium 50 J

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Manganese 0.25 J

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Potassium ND

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:30 1Sodium 260 J

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:53 1Zinc ND

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-6Client Sample ID: EBMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:30


Cadmium ND 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Calcium ND

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:56 1Iron ND

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Magnesium ND

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Manganese ND

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Potassium ND

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:32 1Sodium ND

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:56 1Zinc ND



Cadmium ND 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Calcium 19000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:58 1Iron 3200

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Magnesium 16000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Manganese 410

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Potassium ND

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:34 1Sodium 11000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:58 1Zinc ND

TestAmerica Denver

Page 14 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable



Cadmium ND 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Calcium 19000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Chromium ND

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Cobalt ND

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 19:01 1Iron 2600

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Magnesium 17000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Manganese 290

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Potassium 440 J

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:37 1Sodium 79000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 19:01 1Zinc ND

Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-9Client Sample ID: Leachate- CompositeMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 11:30


Cadmium 1.2 J B 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1


200 35 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Calcium 73000

10 0.66 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Chromium 67

5.0 1.2 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Cobalt 49

50 22 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 19:03 1Iron 11000

200 11 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Magnesium 150000

3.0 0.25 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Manganese 370

3000 240 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Potassium 380000

5000 92 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 04:39 1Sodium 1400000

20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 19:03 1Zinc 53

Method: 6020 - Metals (ICP/MS) - Total Recoverable



Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:40 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:40 1Nickel 1.7 J



Arsenic 1.7 J 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:51 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:51 1Nickel 8.4



Arsenic 0.33 J 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:55 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:55 1Nickel ND

TestAmerica Denver

Page 15 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 6020 - Metals (ICP/MS) - Total Recoverable



Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:59 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 19:59 1Nickel ND



Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:02 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:02 1Nickel ND



Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:06 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:06 1Nickel 0.37 J



Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:10 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:10 1Nickel 0.73 J



Arsenic 0.56 J 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:14 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:14 1Nickel ND



Arsenic 100 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:17 1


4.0 0.30 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 20:17 1Nickel 330

General Chemistry



Chloride 190 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 13:59 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 13:59 1Sulfate 120 B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 18:39 1Ammonia as N 0.029 J

10 4.1 mg/L 07/20/16 08:53 1Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 18:53 1TOC Result 1 0.93 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 18:53 1TOC Result 2 0.95 J

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 17:23 1Total Alkalinity 260

TestAmerica Denver

Page 16 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



General Chemistry (Continued)



Bicarbonate Alkalinity 260 5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 17:23 1


5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 17:23 1Carbonate Alkalinity ND



Chloride 99 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 14:14 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 14:14 1Sulfate 15 B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 18:45 1Ammonia as N 0.17

10 4.1 mg/L 07/20/16 08:53 1Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 11

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/21/16 02:50 1TOC Result 1 4.3

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/21/16 02:50 1TOC Result 2 4.4


5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 17:27 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity 340




Chloride 49 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 14:30 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 14:30 1Sulfate 11 B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 18:47 1Ammonia as N 0.22


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/21/16 03:05 1TOC Result 1 0.37 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/21/16 03:05 1TOC Result 2 0.35 J






Chloride 49 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 14:45 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 14:45 1Sulfate 12 B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 19:03 1Ammonia as N 0.21


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 19:37 1TOC Result 1 0.59 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 19:37 1TOC Result 2 0.54 J






Chloride 1.8 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 15:31 1


TestAmerica Denver

Page 17 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13






Sulfate 0.53 J B 5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 15:31 1


0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 19:05 1Ammonia as N 0.023 J


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:21 1TOC Result 1 0.20 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:21 1TOC Result 2 0.21 J

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 18:04 1Total Alkalinity 1.3 J

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 18:04 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity 1.3 J




Chloride 0.47 J B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 15:47 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 15:47 1Sulfate 0.53 J B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 19:07 1Ammonia as N ND


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:38 1TOC Result 1 0.46 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:38 1TOC Result 2 0.47 J

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 18:07 1Total Alkalinity ND

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 18:07 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity ND




Chloride 17 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 16:02 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 16:02 1Sulfate 4.0 J B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 19:09 1Ammonia as N 0.060 J


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:53 1TOC Result 1 0.48 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 20:53 1TOC Result 2 0.47 J






Chloride 45 B 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 17:04 1


5.0 0.23 mg/L 07/27/16 17:04 1Sulfate 12 B

0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 19:11 1Ammonia as N 0.087 J


1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 21:07 1TOC Result 1 0.21 J

1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 21:07 1TOC Result 2 0.21 J




TestAmerica Denver

Page 18 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



General Chemistry



Chloride 1900 B 60 25 mg/L 07/27/16 17:35 100


25 1.2 mg/L 07/27/16 17:20 5Sulfate 7.9 J B

20 4.4 mg/L 07/22/16 20:41 200Ammonia as N 850

200 81 mg/L 07/20/16 08:53 20Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 1000

20 3.1 mg/L 07/20/16 21:22 20TOC Result 1 320

20 3.1 mg/L 07/20/16 21:22 20TOC Result 2 320

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/22/16 07:29 1Total Alkalinity 4600 B

5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/22/16 07:29 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity 4600 B


Method: Field Sampling - Field Sampling


Date Received: 07/14/16 09:25NONE NONE

Depth to water 5.64 ft 07/13/16 07:14 1


SU 07/13/16 07:14 1Field pH 6.87

umhos/cm 07/13/16 07:14 1Field Conductivity 1128

Degrees C 07/13/16 07:14 1Field Temperature 17.2

NTU 07/13/16 07:14 1Field Turbidity 0.47

mg/L 07/13/16 07:14 1Field Dissolved Oxygen 1.60

millivolts 07/13/16 07:14 1Field EH/ORP 258.1



Depth to water 23.34 ft 07/13/16 07:42 1


SU 07/13/16 07:42 1Field pH 6.72








Depth to water 11.46 ft 07/13/16 08:15 1


SU 07/13/16 08:15 1Field pH 6.80






TestAmerica Denver

Page 19 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: Field Sampling - Field Sampling



Depth to water 9.28 ft 07/13/16 09:20 1


SU 07/13/16 09:20 1Field pH 5.84








Depth to water 9.65 ft 07/13/16 10:10 1


SU 07/13/16 10:10 1Field pH 6.00








Field pH 8.04 SU 07/13/16 10:30 1





TestAmerica Denver

Page 20 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 280-334822/1-AMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335822 Prep Batch: 334822

RL MDL

Cadmium 0.480 J 5.0 0.45 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1

MB MB

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier

ND 35200 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Calcium

ND 0.6610 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Chromium

ND 1.25.0 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Cobalt

ND 2250 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Iron

ND 11200 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Magnesium

ND 0.253.0 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Manganese

ND 2403000 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Potassium

ND 925000 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 03:45 1Sodium


RL MDL

Zinc ND 20 4.5 ug/L 07/26/16 14:20 07/30/16 18:09 1

MB MB


Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 280-334822/2-AMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335822 Prep Batch: 334822

Cadmium 100 99.8 ug/L 100 88 - 111

Analyte

LCS LCS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Calcium 50000 50200 ug/L 100 90 - 111

Chromium 200 200 ug/L 100 90 - 113

Cobalt 500 492 ug/L 98 89 - 111

Iron 1000 988 ug/L 99 89 - 115

Magnesium 50000 47800 ug/L 96 90 - 113

Manganese 500 458 ug/L 92 90 - 110

Potassium 50000 51400 ug/L 103 89 - 114

Sodium 50000 50000 ug/L 100 90 - 115


Zinc 500 487 ug/L 97 85 - 111

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 280-85549-P-1-B MSMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335822 Prep Batch: 334822

Cadmium 1.1 J B 100 100 ug/L 99 82 - 119

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Calcium 590000 50000 638000 4 ug/L 103 48 - 153

Chromium 29 200 228 ug/L 99 73 - 135

Cobalt 2.5 J 500 475 ug/L 95 82 - 119

Iron 54000 1000 54000 4 ug/L 36 52 - 155

TestAmerica Denver

Page 21 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)


Magnesium 250000 50000 289000 4 ug/L 87 62 - 146

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Manganese 4900 500 5370 4 ug/L 88 79 - 121

Potassium 240000 50000 291000 4 ug/L 99 76 - 132

Sodium 980000 50000 1030000 4 ug/L 92 70 - 203


Zinc 380 500 826 ug/L 89 60 - 137

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 280-85549-P-1-C MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335822 Prep Batch: 334822

Cadmium 1.1 J B 100 102 ug/L 101 82 - 119 2 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Calcium 590000 50000 636000 4 ug/L 98 48 - 153 0 20

Chromium 29 200 231 ug/L 101 73 - 135 1 20

Cobalt 2.5 J 500 484 ug/L 96 82 - 119 2 20

Iron 54000 1000 54200 4 ug/L 49 52 - 155 0 20

Magnesium 250000 50000 289000 4 ug/L 87 62 - 146 0 20

Manganese 4900 500 5360 4 ug/L 86 79 - 121 0 20

Potassium 240000 50000 292000 4 ug/L 103 76 - 132 1 20

Sodium 980000 50000 1030000 4 ug/L 97 70 - 203 0 20

Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 280-85549-P-1-C MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335916 Prep Batch: 334822

Zinc 380 500 824 ug/L 88 60 - 137 0 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Method: 6020 - Metals (ICP/MS)


RL MDL

Arsenic ND 10 0.33 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 18:37 1

MB MB


ND 0.304.0 ug/L 07/26/16 08:10 07/26/16 18:37 1Nickel

TestAmerica Denver

Page 22 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 6020 - Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued)


Arsenic 40.0 42.2 ug/L 105 85 - 117

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Nickel 40.0 42.3 ug/L 106 85 - 119

Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 280-85553-E-1-D MSMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335367 Prep Batch: 334823

Arsenic 21 40.0 63.4 ug/L 105 85 - 117

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Nickel 31 40.0 70.4 ug/L 98 85 - 119

Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 280-85553-E-1-E MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total RecoverableAnalysis Batch: 335367 Prep Batch: 334823

Arsenic 21 40.0 63.1 ug/L 104 85 - 117 0 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Nickel 31 40.0 70.2 ug/L 98 85 - 119 0 20

Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 280-335338/6Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

RL MDL

Chloride 0.470 J 0.60 0.25 mg/L 07/27/16 10:44 1

MB MB


0.533 J 0.235.0 mg/L 07/27/16 10:44 1Sulfate

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 280-335338/4Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 100 102 mg/L 102 90 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Sulfate 100 101 mg/L 101 90 - 110

Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 280-335338/5Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 100 102 mg/L 102 90 - 110 0 10

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Sulfate 100 101 mg/L 101 90 - 110 0 10

TestAmerica Denver

Page 23 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography (Continued)

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: MRL 280-335338/3Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 2.50 2.42 J mg/L 97 50 - 150

Analyte

MRL MRL


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Sulfate 2.50 2.45 J mg/L 98 50 - 150

Client Sample ID: MW-10RLab Sample ID: 280-85669-7 MSMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 17 B 25.0 43.5 mg/L 107 80 - 120

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Sulfate 4.0 J B 25.0 29.5 mg/L 102 80 - 120

Client Sample ID: MW-10RLab Sample ID: 280-85669-7 MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 17 B 25.0 43.6 mg/L 107 80 - 120 0 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Sulfate 4.0 J B 25.0 29.6 mg/L 102 80 - 120 0 20

Client Sample ID: MW-10RLab Sample ID: 280-85669-7 DUMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 335338

Chloride 17 B 16.8 mg/L 0 15

Analyte

DU DU

DUnitResult Qualifier

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

Sulfate 4.0 J B 3.98 J mg/L 0.1 15

Method: 350.1 - Nitrogen, Ammonia


RL MDL

Ammonia as N ND 0.10 0.022 mg/L 07/22/16 18:35 1

MB MB



Ammonia as N 2.50 2.56 mg/L 103 90 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


Ammonia as N 2.50 2.64 mg/L 106 90 - 110 3 10

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Denver

Page 24 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 350.1 - Nitrogen, Ammonia (Continued)

Client Sample ID: MW-3Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-1 MSMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334771

Ammonia as N 0.029 J 1.00 1.10 mg/L 107 90 - 110

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: MW-3Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-1 MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334771

Ammonia as N 0.029 J 1.00 1.10 mg/L 107 90 - 110 0 10

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Method: 410.4 - COD


RL MDL

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND 10 4.1 mg/L 07/20/16 08:53 1

MB MB



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 100 93.2 mg/L 93 90 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 100 96.7 mg/L 97 90 - 110 4 11

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND 50.0 51.7 mg/L 103 90 - 110

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND 50.0 48.1 mg/L 96 90 - 110 7 11

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Denver

Page 25 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 410.4 - COD (Continued)


RL MDL

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND 10 4.1 mg/L 07/21/16 09:08 1

MB MB



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 100 96.7 mg/L 97 90 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 100 96.1 mg/L 96 90 - 110 1 11

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 280-85678-D-6 MSMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334524

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 6.0 J F1 50.0 53.9 mg/L 96 90 - 110

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 280-85678-D-6 MSDMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334524

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 6.0 J F1 50.0 48.1 F1 mg/L 84 90 - 110 11 11

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Method: 9060 - Organic Carbon, Total (TOC)


RL MDL

TOC Result 1 ND 1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/20/16 17:54 1

MB MB


ND 0.161.0 mg/L 07/20/16 17:54 1TOC Result 2


RL MDL

TOC Result 1 ND 1.0 0.16 mg/L 07/21/16 02:21 1

MB MB


ND 0.161.0 mg/L 07/21/16 02:21 1TOC Result 2

TestAmerica Denver

Page 26 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: 9060 - Organic Carbon, Total (TOC) (Continued)


TOC Result 1 25.0 24.6 mg/L 98 88 - 112

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TOC Result 2 25.0 24.0 mg/L 96 88 - 112


TOC Result 1 25.0 24.2 mg/L 97 88 - 112

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TOC Result 2 25.0 23.7 mg/L 95 88 - 112


TOC Result 1 25.0 24.5 mg/L 98 88 - 112 1 15

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TOC Result 2 25.0 24.3 mg/L 97 88 - 112 1 15


TOC Result 1 25.0 24.6 mg/L 98 88 - 112 2 15

Analyte

LCSD LCSD


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TOC Result 2 25.0 24.4 mg/L 98 88 - 112 3 15


TOC Result 1 0.93 J 25.0 25.9 mg/L 100 88 - 112

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

TOC Result 2 0.95 J 25.0 25.5 mg/L 98 88 - 112


TOC Result 1 0.93 J 25.0 25.5 mg/L 98 88 - 112 2 15

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TOC Result 2 0.95 J 25.0 25.4 mg/L 98 88 - 112 0 15

TestAmerica Denver

Page 27 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: SM 2320B - Alkalinity


RL MDL

Total Alkalinity ND 5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 15:46 1

MB MB


ND 1.15.0 mg/L 07/19/16 15:46 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity

ND 1.15.0 mg/L 07/19/16 15:46 1Carbonate Alkalinity


RL MDL

Total Alkalinity ND 5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/19/16 17:46 1

MB MB


ND 1.15.0 mg/L 07/19/16 17:46 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity



Total Alkalinity 200 199 mg/L 99 90 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: MW-11RLab Sample ID: 280-85669-3 DUMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334291

Total Alkalinity 260 259 mg/L 0.7 10

Analyte

DU DU


Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD


RL MDL

Total Alkalinity 4.29 J 5.0 1.1 mg/L 07/22/16 07:24 1

MB MB


4.29 J 1.15.0 mg/L 07/22/16 07:24 1Bicarbonate Alkalinity




Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Denver

Page 28 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Method: SM 2320B - Alkalinity (Continued)

Client Sample ID: Leachate- CompositeLab Sample ID: 280-85669-9 DUMatrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NAAnalysis Batch: 334644

Total Alkalinity 4600 B 4690 mg/L 2 10

Analyte

DU DU


Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Denver

Page 29 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Client: Waste Management


Metals

Prep Batch: 334822

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Water 3005A280-85669-1 MW-3 Total Recoverable


Water 3005A280-85669-3 MW-11R Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85669-4 DUP Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85669-5 01FB Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85669-6 EB Total Recoverable



Water 3005A280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total Recoverable

Water 3005AMB 280-334822/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 3005ALCS 280-334822/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85549-P-1-B MS Matrix Spike Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85549-P-1-C MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total Recoverable

Prep Batch: 334823





Water 3005A280-85669-4 DUP Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85669-5 01FB Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85669-6 EB Total Recoverable



Water 3005A280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total Recoverable

Water 3005AMB 280-334823/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 3005ALCS 280-334823/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85553-E-1-D MS Matrix Spike Total Recoverable

Water 3005A280-85553-E-1-E MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total Recoverable

Analysis Batch: 335367


Water 6020 334823280-85669-1 MW-3 Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85669-2 MW-4 Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85669-3 MW-11R Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85669-4 DUP Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85669-5 01FB Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85669-6 EB Total Recoverable



Water 6020 334823280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823MB 280-334823/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823LCS 280-334823/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85553-E-1-D MS Matrix Spike Total Recoverable

Water 6020 334823280-85553-E-1-E MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total Recoverable



Water 6010B 334822280-85669-1 MW-3 Total Recoverable


Water 6010B 334822280-85669-3 MW-11R Total Recoverable

TestAmerica Denver

Page 30 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



Metals (Continued)

Analysis Batch: 335822 (Continued)


Water 6010B 334822280-85669-4 DUP Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85669-5 01FB Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85669-6 EB Total Recoverable



Water 6010B 334822280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822MB 280-334822/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822LCS 280-334822/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85549-P-1-B MS Matrix Spike Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85549-P-1-C MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total Recoverable






Water 6010B 334822280-85669-4 DUP Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85669-5 01FB Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85669-6 EB Total Recoverable



Water 6010B 334822280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822MB 280-334822/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822LCS 280-334822/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85549-P-1-B MS Matrix Spike Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 334822280-85549-P-1-C MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total Recoverable

General Chemistry



Water SM 2320B280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water SM 2320B280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA

Water SM 2320B280-85669-3 MW-11R Total/NA

Water SM 2320B280-85669-4 DUP Total/NA

Water SM 2320B280-85669-5 01FB Total/NA

Water SM 2320B280-85669-6 EB Total/NA



Water SM 2320BMB 280-334291/31 Method Blank Total/NA


Water SM 2320BLCS 280-334291/30 Lab Control Sample Total/NA


Water SM 2320B280-85669-3 DU MW-11R Total/NA



Water 410.4280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-3 MW-11R Total/NA

TestAmerica Denver

Page 31 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13






Water 410.4280-85669-4 DUP Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-5 01FB Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-6 EB Total/NA



Water 410.4280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total/NA

Water 410.4MB 280-334330/5 Method Blank Total/NA

Water 410.4LCS 280-334330/3 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 410.4LCSD 280-334330/4 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-1 MS MW-3 Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85669-1 MSD MW-3 Total/NA






Water 410.4280-85678-D-6 MS Matrix Spike Total/NA

Water 410.4280-85678-D-6 MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA



Water 9060280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-3 MW-11R Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-4 DUP Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-5 01FB Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-6 EB Total/NA



Water 9060280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total/NA

Water 9060MB 280-334543/16 Method Blank Total/NA

Water 9060MB 280-334543/50 Method Blank Total/NA

Water 9060LCS 280-334543/14 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 9060LCS 280-334543/48 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 9060LCSD 280-334543/15 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

Water 9060LCSD 280-334543/49 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-1 MS MW-3 Total/NA

Water 9060280-85669-1 MSD MW-3 Total/NA



Water SM 2320B280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total/NA



Water SM 2320B280-85669-9 DU Leachate- Composite Total/NA



Water 350.1280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water 350.1280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA

TestAmerica Denver

Page 32 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13








Water 350.1280-85669-5 01FB Total/NA








Water 350.1280-85669-1 MS MW-3 Total/NA

Water 350.1280-85669-1 MSD MW-3 Total/NA



Water 300.0280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water 300.0280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA



Water 300.0280-85669-5 01FB Total/NA









Water 300.0MRL 280-335338/3 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 300.0280-85669-7 MS MW-10R Total/NA

Water 300.0280-85669-7 MSD MW-10R Total/NA

Water 300.0280-85669-7 DU MW-10R Total/NA

Field Service / Mobile Lab



Water Field Sampling280-85669-1 MW-3 Total/NA

Water Field Sampling280-85669-2 MW-4 Total/NA

Water Field Sampling280-85669-3 MW-11R Total/NA



Water Field Sampling280-85669-9 Leachate- Composite Total/NA

TestAmerica Denver

Page 33 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Lab ChronicleClient: Waste Management TestAmerica Job ID: 280-85669-1Project/Site: AR02|Ozark Ridge

Client Sample ID: MW-3 Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-1Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 08:14

Date Received: 07/14/16 09:25

Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch

Prep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil

Total Recoverable 50 mL 50 mL

Analysis 6010B 1 335822 07/30/16 04:19 CRR TAL DENTotal Recoverable

Prep 3005A 334822 07/26/16 14:20 MLS TAL DENTotal Recoverable 50 mL 50 mL


Prep 3005A 334823 07/26/16 08:10 TEB TAL DENTotal Recoverable 50 mL 50 mL

Analysis 6020 1 335367 07/26/16 19:40 JM TAL DENTotal Recoverable

Analysis 300.0 1 335338 07/27/16 13:59 AFB TAL DENTotal/NA 5 mL 5 mL

Analysis 350.1 1 334771 07/22/16 18:39 CML TAL DENTotal/NA

Analysis 410.4 1 334330 07/20/16 08:53 CCJ TAL DENTotal/NA 2 mL 2 mL

Analysis 9060 1 334543 07/20/16 18:53 CCJ TAL DENTotal/NA

Analysis SM 2320B 1 334291 07/19/16 17:23 IEU TAL DENTotal/NA

Analysis Field Sampling 1 333965 07/13/16 07:14 C1K TAL DENTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: MW-4 Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-2Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 08:42


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil













Client Sample ID: MW-11R Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-3Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:15


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil







TestAmerica Denver

Page 34 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13




Analysis 300.0 AFB07/27/16 14:301 TAL DEN335338

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil

Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL






Client Sample ID: DUP Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-4Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:20


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil












Client Sample ID: 01FB Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-5Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:25


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil












TestAmerica Denver

Page 35 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13


Client Sample ID: EB Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-6Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 09:30


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil














Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil















Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil








TestAmerica Denver

Page 36 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13




Analysis 350.1 CML07/22/16 19:111 TAL DEN334771

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil

Total/NA





Client Sample ID: Leachate- Composite Lab Sample ID: 280-85669-9Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 07/13/16 11:30


Prep 3005A MLS07/26/16 14:20 TAL DEN334822

Type

Batch

Method

Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Initial

Amount Amount

Final Batch

NumberFactor

Dil














Laboratory References:

TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100

TestAmerica Denver

Page 37 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 38 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 39 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 40 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 41 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 42 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 43 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Page 44 of 45 8/4/2016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Login Sample Receipt Checklist

Client: Waste Management Job Number: 280-85669-1

Login Number: 85669

Question Answer Comment

Creator: Muniz, Ashley T

List Source: TestAmerica Denver

List Number: 1

N/ARadioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below background

TrueThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.

TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with.

TrueSamples were received on ice.

TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.

TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.

TrueCOC is present.

TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.

TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.

TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?

TrueThere are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and the COC.

TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (Excluding tests with immediate HTs)..

TrueSample containers have legible labels.

TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.

TrueSample collection date/times are provided.

TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.

TrueSample bottles are completely filled.

N/ASample Preservation Verified

TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs

TrueVOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in diameter.

TrueIf necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT needs

TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.

TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.

TrueSampling Company provided.

TrueSamples received within 48 hours of sampling.

TrueSamples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field.

N/AChlorine Residual checked.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13



ATTACHMENT D UPDATED FINANCIAL ASSURANCE

OWNER: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc. PERMIT No.: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN No.: 75‐00046

OPERATOR: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc.

TOTAL PERMITTED WASTE DISPOSAL ACRES: 66

TOTAL PERMITTED ACRES CERTIFIED CLOSED: 10

ITEM

No.ITEM QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST SUBTOTALS SOURCE OF UNIT COST INFO

1.0.0

1.1.0Engineering (Design, Bid Documents, Procurement, Construction Contract

Mangement) 1 Lump Sum 25,000 25,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.2.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey 45 ACRE 200 9,000$ 2012 Construction Costs

1.3.0Engineering Services (Construction Oversight, Testing, Reporting,

Certification) 45 ACRE 4,000 180,000$ Engineer's EstimateProfessional Services Subtotal 214,000$

2.0.02.1.02.1.1 Preparation of landfill to receive cover (final grading) 45 ACRE $1,000.00 45,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.1.2Clay, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match

earthwork balance) 72,600 CU. YD. $3.25 235,950$ 2012 Construction Cost

2.1.3Clay, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match earthwork

balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/ALow Permeability Soil Layer Subtotal 280,950$

2.2.0

2.2.1 Drainage material‐‐sand 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

2.2.2 Drainage material‐‐geocomposite 1,960,200 SQ. FT. $0.39 764,478$ 2012 Construction Costs

2.2.3 Geomembrane (40 mil) 1,960,200 SQ. FT. $0.29 568,458$ WM Workbook EstimatesGeomembrane and Drainage Layer Subtotal 1,332,936$

2.3.0

2.3.1 Protective Soil, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match

earthwork balance and must be guaranteed for future availability) 114,345 CU. YD. $3.25 371,621$ 2012 Construction Cost

2.3.2Protective Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match

earthwork balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

2.3.3 Vegetative Soil (Topsoil), On‐site (excavate, transport, place) (Quantity must match

earthwork balance and must be guaranteed for future availability) 36,300 CU. YD. $2.65 96,195$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.4Vegetative Soil (Topsoil), Off‐site (excavate, transport, place) (Quantity must match

earthwork balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.5 Seeding and mulching 45 ACRE $1,470.00 66,150$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.6 Fertilizer 45 ACRE $350.00 15,750$ WM Workbook EstimatesProtective Soil and Vegetative Layer Subtotal 549,716$

3.0.0

3.1.0 Terraces and letdowns 4,000 Lin. FT. $80.00 320,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

3.2.0 Checkdams and filters 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ Engineer's Estimate

3.3.0 Grass ditching/channels 1,500 Lin. FT. $1.25 1,875$ Engineer's Estimate

3.4.0 Riprap ditching/channels (includes rock in mid‐slope benches) 4,000 Lin. FT. $15.00 60,000$ Engineer's EstimateErosion Control Subtotal 384,375$

4.0.0

4.1.0 Gas vents, vents, _____ average depth 0 Lin. FT. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

4.2.0 Passive System

4.2.1 Passive well head flare 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

4.3.0 Active System

4.3.1 Flare, ___ BTU/hour 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

4.3.2 Additonal Well Installation 20 ACRE $5,000.00 100,000$ 2012 Construction Costs (Assumes 1 well/acre @ $5,000/well)

4.3.4 Ancillary gas equipment (piping, blowers, condensate collection) 20 ACRE $4,500.00 90,000$ 2012 Construction Costs (Assumes @ $4,500/acre)Gas System Subtotal 190,000$

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Protective Soil and Vegetative Layer

EROSION CONTROL

GAS SYSTEM

LANDFILL CLOSURE ‐ COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET

LANDFILL CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Permit: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046

LARGEST ACREAGE EVER REQURING FINAL COVER OVER ACTIVE LANDFILL LIFE: 45.0 (i.e., largest acreage ever open at any one time; NOTE: if approved Closure Plan does not include phased closure then largest area is the total permitted disposal acres)

ESTIMATOR: Bryan Bailey DATE: Feburary 27, 2017

ACRES CURRENTLY OPEN: 40.89 (i.e., "open" means areas subject to regulation and have not been certified closed)

Low Permeability Soil Layer

Geomembrane and Drainage Layer

FINAL COVER

Page 1 of 2

1/11/13

ITEM



5.0.0

5.1.0 Well installation 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.2.0 Upgrade existing wells 0 LS $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.3.0 Dedicated pump/sampling system installation/upgrade 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.4.0Baseline sample collection (4 events per first year, _____ samples per event) 0 EVENT $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.5.0Baseline sample analysis and reporting (4 events per first year, _____ samples

per event)) 0 EVENT $0.00 ‐$ N/A

Groundwater Monitoring System Subtotal ‐$

6.0.0

6.1.0 Additional/upgrades for collection piping 0 Lin. FT $0.00 ‐$ N/A

6.2.0 Additonal/upgrades to pumps 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

6.3.0 Additional/upgrades to storage containers 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

6.4.0 Baseline sample collection 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

6.5.0 Baseline sample analysis and reporting 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

Leachate Collection System Subtotal ‐$

7.0.0

7.1.0 Excess solid waste 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

7.2.0 Mobile equipment/machinery (e.g., containers, tanks, etc…) 1 Lump Sum $10,000.00 10,000$ Engineer's Estimate

7.3.0 Stored leachate 65,000 GAL. $0.0550 3,575$ Russville City Corp

7.4.0 Contaminated soils 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

Operations and Inventory Removal Subtotal 13,575$

8.0.0

8.1.0 Office/shop/maintenace and other ancillary buildings 1 Lump Sum $7,500.00 7,500$ WM Workbook Estimates

8.2.0Equipment to be decommisioned (e.g., weigh scales, bulking/solidification pits, collection pits/sumps, piping, etc…) 1 Lump Sum $5,000.00 5,000$ Engineer's Estimate

8.3.0 Site Utilities 1 Lump Sum $15,000.00 15,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

Demolition/Removal Site Improvements Subtotal 27,500$

9.0.0

9.1.0 Fencing 100 Lin. FT. $18.00 1,800$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.2.0 Gates 1 Lump Sum $8,000.00 8,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.3.0 Access barriers 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.4.0 Other security equipment 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ Engineer's Estimate

Replace/Rebuild Site Access Controls Subtotal 14,800$

10.0.0

10.1.0 Regrade and site prep 20 ACRE $1,640.00 32,800$ 2012 Construction Costs

10.2.0 Soil, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 0 CU.YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

10.3.0 Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

10.4.0 Seeding and mulching 20 ACRE $1,000.00 20,000$ 2012 Construction Costs

10.5.0 Fertilizer 20 ACRE $315.00 6,300$ 2012 Construction Costs

Borrow Area Reclamation Subtotal 59,100$

3,066,952$

11.0.0

11.1.0 Administration and Contingency $122,678.09 122,678$ WM Workbook Estimates

‐$

Misc. Subtotal 122,678$

3,189,630$

3,246,087$ Times inflation factor for 2013 (X 101.77%)



3,360,178$ Times inflation factor for 2016 (X 101.002%)UPDATED 2016 CLOSURE COST

2014 TOTAL CLOSURE COST

GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM

LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM

BORROW AREA RECLAMATION




MISCELLANEOUS

OPERATIONS AND INVENTORY REMOVAL

DEMOLITION/REMOVAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS

REPLACE/REBUILD SITE ACCESS CONTROLS

Total Closure Cost Subtotal

Page 2 of 2

1/11/13

OWNER: Ozark Ridge Landfill, LLC PERMIT NO.: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046

OPERATOR: Ozrak Ridge Landfill, LLC



ITEM


1.0.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

1.1.0Engineering (Annual inspection and reporting, corrective action design and

bid, contract management) 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.2.0Topographic and Boundary Survey (annual, final, and corrective action, if

required) 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.3.0Corrective Action Engineering Services (Construction Oversight, Testing,

Reporting, Certification) 1 Lump Sum $28,200.00 28,200.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesProfessional Services Annual Subtotal 33,200.00$

2.0.0 FINAL COVER ROUTINE MAINTENANCE

2.1.0Inspect soil cover, vents, flares, drainage letdowns and outfalls, etc... 2 Event $2,500.00 5,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.2.0 Mowing/Trimming 66 ACRE $50.00 3,300.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.0 Clean Drain/Vent Openings 2 Event $2,075.00 4,150.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Final Cover Routine Maintenance Annual Subtotal 12,450.00$

3.0.0 FINAL COVER REPAIRS3.1.0

Remove/incorporate unacceptable materials (e.g., dead vegetation, solid

waste) 5 ACRE $50.00 250.00$ Engineers Estimate

3.2.0 Scarify and prepare surface 5 ACRE $1,640.00 8,200.00$ 2012 Construction Costs

3.3.0 Soil, On‐Site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 3,500 CU. YD. $3.25 11,375.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

3.4.0 Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) CU. YD. ‐$ N/A

3.5.0 Seeding and mulching 5 ACRE $3,200.00 16,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

3.6.0 Fertilizer 5 ACRE $800.00 4,000.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesFinal Cover Repairs Annual Subtotal 39,825.00$

4.0.0 ACCESS ROADS REPAIRS4.1.0 Reshape/regrade subgrade 3,000 SQ. FT. $2.00 6,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

4.2.0 Gravel (transport, place, compact) 200 TON $30.00 6,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

4.3.0 Drainage Structures (e.g., culverts, 1 LS $2,500.00 2,500.00$ Engineer's Estimate

4.4.0 Riprap ditching/channels 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000.00$ Engineer's EstimateAccess Roads Repair Annual Subtotal 15,500.00$

5.0.0 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)

5.1.0Collection system operation and maintenance (ditches, piping conveyances,

outfalls, sampling points repair/replace) 1 Lump Sum $2,000.00 2,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

5.2.0 Stormwater storage (sediment pond) operation/repairs 1 Lump Sum $1,200.00 1,200.00$ Engineer's Estimate

5.3.0 Sample collection ( 2 events per year) 2 Event $500.00 1,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

5.4.0 Sample analysis and reporting ( 2 events per year) 2 Event $500.00 1,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Surface Water Management O&M Annual Subtotal 5,200.00$

6.0.0 LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM O&MGeneration Rate = 125,000 gal/yr.

6.1.0Collection operation/maintenance (pump, piping,

storage...operation/repair/replace) 1 YEAR $2,000.00 2,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

6.2.0Leachate loading, off‐loading and off‐site transportation Event ‐$ Russelville City Corp

6.3.0 Leachate Treatment/Disposal 125,000 Gal. $0.0550 6,875.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

6.4.0 Additional/upgrades for piping, pumps and storage 1 Lump Sum $3,000.00 3,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

6.5.0 Leachate sample collection 1 YEAR $1,500.00 1,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

6.6.0 Leachate sample analysis and reporting 1 YEAR $5,000.00 5,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Leachate Collection System O&M Annual Subtotal 18,375.00$

7.0.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM O&MNumber of Wells in Approved System = 8

LANDFILL POST‐CLOSURE CARE ‐ ANNUAL COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET

LANDFILL POST‐CLOSURE CARE ‐ ANNUAL COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Permit: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046

ESTIMATOR: Bryan Bailey DATE: Feburary 27, 2017

Page 1 of 2

1/11/13

ITEM



7.1.0Well maintenance (e.g., protective casing (lock & hinges) repair/replacement,

well pad repair/replace, etc…) 1 LS $650.00 650.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

7.2.0 Upgrade/redevelop existing wells 1 LS $320.00 320.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

7.3.0 Well Replacement 1 LS $333.00 333.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

7.4.0 Sample collection (2 events per year) 2 Event $3,800.00 7,600.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

7.5.0 Sample analysis and reporting (2 events per year) 2 Event $6,500.00 13,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Groundwater Monitoring System O&M Annual Subtotal 21,903.00$

8.0.0 GAS MONITORING SYSTEM O&M8.1.0 Number of Gas Monitoring Probes/Wells = 4

8.2.0 Methane monitoring of probes/wells (4 per year) 4 Event $560.00 2,240.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

8.3.0 Methane monitoring at site boundary and structures (4 per year) 4 Event $420.00 1,680.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

8.4.0 Sample analysis and reporting 4 Event $145.00 580.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesGas Monitoring System O&M Annual Subtotal 4,500.00$

9.0.0 GAS EXTRACTION SYSTEM O&M9.1.0 Passive System

9.1.1 Passive well head flare maintenance 1 EACH $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.2.0 Active System

9.2.1 Flare, BTU/hour 1 EACH $9,000.00 9,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.2.2 Additional Well Installation/Upgrades 1 EACH $850.00 850.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.2.3Ancillary gas equipment repair/replacement (piping, blowers, condensate

collection) 1 Lump Sum $1,200.00 1,200.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesGas Extraction System O&M Annual Subtotal 13,550.00$

10.0.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

10.1.0Resurvey monitoring well reference points and site benchmarks (prorate for

annual expenses) 1 EACH $2,200.00 2,200.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.2.0 Remove sediments from stormwater basin(s) (prorate for annual expenses) 1 EACH $3,500.00 3,500.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.3.0 Groundwater exceedances statistical evaluation 1 EACH $2,000.00 2,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.4.0Groundwater alternate source determination) (prorate for annual expenses) 1 EACH $5,000.00 5,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.5.0 Groundwater compliance monitoring (prorate for annual expense) 8 EACH $2,400.00 19,200.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

10.6.0Other: __________________________________________________

________________________________________________________ EACH ‐$ Corrective Action Evaluation and Implementation Annual Subtotal 31,900.00$

Total Post‐Closure Care Annual Cost Subtotal 196,403.00$

11.0.0 MISCELLANEOUS11.1.0 Administration and Contingency 7,856.12$

$

$

Misc. Subtotal $

TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL POST‐CLOSURE CARE COST 204,259.12$

6,127,773.60$

1,225,554.72$

6,236,235.19$

1,247,247.04$

6,299,532.98$

1,259,907$

6,391,380$

1,278,276$

6,455,422$

1,291,084$

ESTIMATED 30 YEAR POST‐CLOSURE CARE PERIOD‐2015

30 x "Total Estimated Annual Post‐Closure Care Cost".ESTIMATED 30 YEAR POST‐CLOSURE CARE PERIOD

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 2013 Times inflation factor for 2013 (X 101.77%)

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 2012 20% of Total Post‐Closure Care Cost





UPDATED CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 2016 Times inflation factor for 2016 (X 101.002%)


Page 2 of 2

1/11/13

NATIONAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT100 BANK STREET, SUITE 610• BURLINGTON, VT 05401

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE

Closure Post-Closure Corrective Action[Check appropriate Box(es)]

Name and Address of Insurer (herein called the “Insurer”):National Guaranty Insurance Company of Vermont

100 Bank Street, Suite 610, Burlington, VT 05401

Name and Address of Insured (herein called the “Insured”):Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc.

10140 Ozark Ridge Access, Danville, AR 72833

Solid Waste Facility(ies) covered by this Certificate of Insurance:(Use additional pages, ifnecessary)Name: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc.Address: 10140 Ozark Ridge Access, Danville, AR 72833Contact Person/Title: David Conrad, Market Area Engineering Manager — ArkansasContact Phone Number: 501-982-7336Permit Number: 0225-S 1-R5AFIN: 75-00046Closure Cost Estimate: $3 ,3 60,178.00Post Closure Cost Estimate: $1,291,084.00Corrective Action (if required): N/AAmount of Insurance for Closure: $3,360,178.00Amount of Insurance for Post-Closure: $1,291,084.00

Face Amount: $4,651,262.00

Policy Number: CPC$02-0002

Effective Date: 03/05/2002 (Coverage Period 3/31/17 — 3/31/1 8)

The Insurer hereby certifies that it has issued to the Insured the policy of insuranceidentified above to provide financial assurance for closure and post-closure care for thefacilities identified above. The Insurer further warrants that this policy conforms in allrespects with the requirements of Regulation 22.1405 (d). It is agreed that any provisionof the policy inconsistent with such regulations is hereby amended to eliminate suchinconsistency.

Whenever requested by the ADEQ Director, the Insurer agrees to furnish to the ADEQDirector a duplicate original of the policy listed above, including all endorsementsthereon.

The parties below certify that the wording of this Certificate of Insurance is identical tothe wording specified by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality.

iNSURER: National Guaranty Insurance Company of Vermont

By:Brittany L. rrigan, Attomey-In-act

INSURED: Waste Management of Arkansas. Inc.

By: .iJt4(ii’L(JUbJJUIJMarcy Wa9rfall AttomeyUn-Fact

CERTIFICATION OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY INSURER:

National Guaranty Insurance Company of VermontSTATE Of VERMONTCOUNTY OF CHITTENDENOn this day of March, 2017 before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Brittany

acknowledged herself to have been on the relevant date an Authorized Signer of Nationalmy of Vermont, and that she, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the

purposes therein contained, by signing her name in her official capacity on the datewhere her signature appears.

Whereof I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

t My Commission Expires:LLIC

-r

ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY INSURED:

Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc.STATE Of VERMONT

Of CHITTENDENday of March, 2017 before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Marcyvledged herself to have been on the relevant date an Authorized Signer of Wastesas, Inc., and that she, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the Insurancetherein contained, by signing her name in his official capacity on the date reflectedsignature appears.

My Commission Expires:

- q

APPROVAL FORM BY THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(ADEQ)

We have reviewed this Insurance Policy and will approve the establishment of this InsurancePolicy as meeting our financial assurance requirements.

By:

Title:

FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CHECKLISTInsurance

Company Name: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc. Permit No.:0225-S1-R5

YES NO QUESTION

Is the insurer licensed to transact the business of insurance, or eligible to provideinsurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer, in the State of Arkansas? [Reg.22.1405(d)(l)J

Does the closure or post-closure care insurance policy guarantee that funds will beavailable to close the permitted facility whenever final closure occurs or to provide post-closure care for the permitted facility whenever the post-closure care period begins?[Reg.22.1405 (d)(2)J

Does the policy guarantee that once closure or post-closure care begins, the insurer willbe responsible for the paying out of funds to the owner or operator or other personauthorized to conduct closure or post-closure care, up t an amount equal to the faceamount of the policy?[Reg.22.1405 (d)(2)J

Is the insurance policy issued for a face amount at least equal to the current cost estimatefor closure or post-closure care, whichever is applicable? [Reg.22.1405 (d)(3)]

Has the owner or operator provided the insurance policy to the Director for approval?[Reg.22.1405 (d)(l)]

Does the policy contain a provision allowing assignment of the policy to a successorowner or operator? [Reg.22.1405 (d)(5)]

n Has the owner or operator provided the initial and updated cost estimates for closure andpost-closure care to the Director? [Reg.22.1405 (a) and Reg.22.1405 (b)J

Does the insurance policy provide that the insurer may not cancel, terminate or fail torenew the policy except for failure to pay the premium? If there is a failure to pay thepremium, the insurer may cancel the policy by sending notice of cancellation by certifiedmail to the owner and operator and to the Director one hundred twenty (120) days inadvance of cancellation. {Reg.22. 1405 (d)(6)]

u If the policy provides coverage for post-closure care, and commencing on the date thatliability to make payments pursuant to the policy accrues, does the policy require theinsurer to annually increase the amount of the policy? [Reg.22.1405 (d)(7)]

Comments: —

Reviewed by:

Date:



ATTACHMENT E UPDATED CLOSURE PLAN

CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLAN OZARK RIDGE CLASS I LANDFILL

ADEQ PERMIT NO.: 0225-S1-R5 AFIN: 75-00046

Original dated September 2002 Revision No. 1: June 2011 Revision No. 2: June 2016

Prepared for:

Waste Management of Arkansas

Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill 10140 Ozark Ridge Access Lane

Danville, AR 72833

Prepared by:

Shepherd Engineering Design Co., Inc. 7015 North Robinson

Oklahoma City, OK 73116 (405) 996-5301

SEDCo Project No.: 16020

SEDCo Closure and Post Closure Plan Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill Waste Management of Arkansas ADEQ Permit No.: 0225-S1-R5 AFIN: 75-00046

SEDCo Project No.: 16020 Original Dated September 2002 Revision No. 2: June 2016 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 PURPOSE, SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY ....................................................................... 1 1.2 FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN .......................................................................... 1

2.0 CLOSURE PLAN ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 2

2.1.1 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................... 2 2.1.2 ESTIMATED CLOSURE COSTS ............................................................................ 2 2.1.3 FACILITY RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................. 2 2.1.4 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ..................................................................................... 2

2.2 CLOSURE COVER DESIGN AND INSTALLATION ............................................................ 3 2.2.1 PERMITTED FINAL COVER DESIGN ..................................................................... 3 2.2.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 3 2.2.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PLAN .......................................... 4 2.2.4 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ......................................................................... 4

2.3 CLOSURE SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ 4 2.4 CLOSURE DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................... 5

2.4.1 LAND USE RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................. 5 2.4.2 CLOSURE CERTIFICATION .................................................................................. 6

3.0 POST CLOSURE PLAN .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 POST CLOSURE MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE ...................................................... 7 3.2 CONTACT PERSONS .................................................................................................. 7 3.3 POST CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE ............................................................................... 7 3.4 SITE MANAGEMENT AND USE ..................................................................................... 8 3.5 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION ................................................................................ 8

FIGURES FIGURE 1 Site Location FIGURE 2 Final Cover System Cross Section LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Estimated Closure Costs APPENDIX B Estimated Post Closure Costs


SEDCo Project No.: 16020 Original Dated September 2002 Revision No. 2: June 2016 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose, Scope and Applicability The Ozark Ridge Class I Landfill (ORLF) submitted a major permit modification in September 2002 that was subsequently approved by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) in July 2004. The following document is mostly the original Closure and Post-Closure Plan with some minor updates and changes. A subsequent alternative closure plan was submitted and approved, in September 2003, by the ADEQ for the ORLF. This document has an ADEQ Reference Number of 21922. This Closure and Post Closure Care Plan addresses Chapters 13 and 14 of the ADEQ Regulation 22 and the memorandum issued by Laura Gilson, ADEQ Solid Waste Division Management Chief, dated August 8, 1996, concerning financial assurance updates. These references state the requirements for closure and post-closure care of a Class 1 Solid Waste Facility. Section number references are placed in brackets throughout this plan to identify the applicable section of Regulation 22 being addressed. This plan includes a description of the steps that will be taken to close each ORLF facility cell, a general schedule for closure, a description of the final cover system and the methods used to install the cover, and a description of post closure care activities. Information supplemental to this closure plan, such as full-scale Class 1 facility design, are in the facility Permit Application. A copy of the Closure and Post-Closure Care Plan will be placed in the ORLF permanent operating record (POR) and notification provided to the ADEQ (Section 22.1301(d)). 1.2 Facility Description and Design Waste Management of Arkansas (WMAR) owns and operates a Class 1 sanitary landfill near Danville, Arkansas in accordance with solid waste Permit 0225-S1-R5. The site is generally located in Sections 14 and 15, Township 5 North, Range 21 West all in Yell County, Arkansas. FIGURE 1 shows the general geographic location of the ORLF. FIGURE 2 shows the future final cover system configuration of the ORLF based on the expanded design.



2.0 CLOSURE PLAN 2.1 Closure Requirements

2.1.1 Notification Requirements The ADEQ will be notified when the ORLF facility stops receiving waste for disposal. The Director of the ADEQ will be notified, prior to the beginning of closure of each unit, that the intent to close the unit has been placed in the POR (Section 22.1301(e)).

2.1.2 Estimated Closure Costs In accordance with Section 22.1402, estimated costs for closing the ORLF facility have been developed. The estimated closure costs are based on hiring a third party to close the largest area requiring final cover at any given time during the operation of the Class 1 facility. The estimated closure costs are presented in APPENDIX A of this document.

2.1.3 Facility Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements A copy of the approved closure and post-closure plan will be kept in the POR (Section 22.520(a)(6)). The Director of the ADEQ will be notified that closure and post-closure plans have been prepared and placed in the POR (Section 22.1302(e)). The records will be permanently maintained in the facility Operating Record unless destruction of the records is authorized by the Director of the ADEQ following the completion of the post closure monitoring period (Section 22.521(d)). The Director of the ADEQ will be provided with the initial and updated closure and post closure cost estimates for the ORLF, as described in sections 2.1.2 and 3.3, respectively. These estimates will also be placed within the POR (Section 22.421(a)(6)).

2.1.4 Financial Assurance Evidence of a financial assurance mechanism for closure and post-closure care will be placed in the POR. The financial assurance mechanism for closure and post-closure care will be provided until the ORLF facility is released from financial assurance requirements by demonstrating compliance with grading, surveying and post-closure notification.



2.2 Closure Cover Design and Installation

2.2.1 Permitted Final Cover Design As each waste cell is filled to its design capacity, the permitted cover system will be installed. Cover construction will be scheduled to occur during months that will minimize wet weather problems. Upon completion of installation of the cover soils, the area will be immediately seeded. The vegetative cover will be maintained to prevent erosion of cover soils. The cover system construction will be monitored and documented in accordance with ORLF facility Construction Quality Assurance Plan. Documents related to final cover system construction activities will be placed in the POR and the ADEQ will be notified of such activity. Upon completion of the installation of the final cover system over the entire ORLF facility, the site will be surveyed by a registered professional engineer or surveyor to document the final elevations of the ORLF, the location of the surface improvements, site boundaries, and areas that received waste (Section 22.1301(i)). Final closure of the site will be achieved when all permitted cells have been filled and have the final cover system installed. Closure will be considered complete after the final cover has been inspected and approved by the ADEQ.

2.2.2 Construction Specifications As each waste cell approaches design capacity, ORLF will prepare the subsequent waste cell area. Any excavated soils will be transported to a designated stockpile location. Cover system material stockpiles will be maintained to minimize erosion problems. The final cover system will be installed during months that will minimize wet weather problems. Prior to installing the final cover system, the ORLF will grade the side-slopes of the waste area to meet the design requirements. The cover materials will consist of borrowed soils or stockpiled soils. The cover materials will be placed on the area requiring cover and compacted/moisture conditioned to the appropriate density and moisture content. The cover soils will be tested in accordance with the ORLF facility Construction Quality Assurance Plan. After installation of the cover soils, the vegetative cover will be established. Cover system certification activities will include:

Survey of cover system including total thickness of cover and any additional features related to the cover system (i.e., stormwater structures, roads, berms, etc.); and



Development of certification report by a registered professional engineer which will include a summary of all construction activities, description of installed items and materials used, an "as-built" plan at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet or less, and a summary statement signed and sealed by the certifying professional.

2.2.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan

Construction of the final cover system is outlined in the ORLF Construction Quality Assurance Plan. The plan describes the steps necessary for closure construction activities of the Class 1 facility at any point during its active life in accordance with the final cover design requirements. In accordance with the plan, all cover system construction activities will be monitored and documented to assure that the system complies with the permit requirements. The certification document of the construction activities will be placed in the POR when completed.

2.2.4 Erosion Control Measures Erosion control measures such as hay bale checks, silt fences, or erosion control matting will be installed in areas where excessive erosion may occur such as side-slopes, discharge locations of stormwater structures and drainage channels. 2.3 Closure Schedule Closure of the ORLF facility will begin following the final receipt of waste or if the ORLF has remaining capacity and there is a reasonable likelihood that it will receive additional wastes, no later than one year after the most recent receipt of waste. Typically, the largest area of the ORLF unit requiring a final cover at any time during the active life consist of approximately 45.0 acres. An estimated schedule, based on this 45.0-acre area, for completing all activities necessary for closure is presented in TABLE 1.



TABLE 1 ESTIMATED CLOSURE SCHEDULE

LARGEST CELL AREA

Closure Activity/Task Number of Days to

Complete

Notify the Department of intent to perform closure -

Begin closure activities 20

Perform grading of waste 10

Install final cover system 120

Seed and mulch 15

Installation of erosion and sediment control structures 14

Complete certification report -

Complete certification report 180

It is estimated that closure of the ORLF facility will be completed no later than 180 days following the beginning of closure activities. If necessary, due to inclement weather or other circumstances (Section 22.1301(g)), a request to extend this schedule may be made to the Director of the ADEQ. 2.4 Closure Documentation

2.4.1 Land Use Restrictions Following placement of final cover over the entire ORLF facility, a notation will be recorded on the deed to the property. The Director of the ADEQ will be notified that the notation has been recorded and a copy has been placed in the POR. The notation on the deed must inform any potential purchaser of the property of the following:

The past use of the land was as a solid waste disposal facility;

Future use shall comply with the ADEQ regulations and shall not disturb the integrity of the final cover system or any other components of the containment of monitoring



system; and

It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, company, corporation or other entity to build, erect, or construct any house, home, or building to be used for residential purposes.

The restriction of residential construction applies only to the areas actually used for solid waste disposal. The owner may request permission from the Director of the ADEQ to remove notation from the deed if all wastes are removed from the facility (Section 22.1301(j) and (k)).

2.4.2 Closure Certification Following closure of the ORLF facility, the Director of the ADEQ will be provided a certification, signed by a registered professional engineer, verifying that closure has been completed in accordance with the closure plan, and the this certification has been placed in the POR. A final closure report shall accompany the certification that includes:

The final survey, in accordance with Section 22.1301(i);

Quality control and quality assurance data documenting proper construction and installation of the cover system;

A copy of the deed notation required under Section 22.1301(j); and

Other information that the ADEQ may deem necessary to making the certification described in Section 22.1302(m).



3.0 POST CLOSURE PLAN The post closure period will be thirty years following the date of written confirmation by the ADEQ that the ORLF facility has been closed in accordance with the approved closure plan, unless the period is decreased or increased by the Director of the ADEQ (Section 22.1302(c)(4)). The period may be decreased if ORLF demonstrates that the reduced period is sufficient to protect human health and the environment and this demonstration is approved by the Director of the ADEQ (Section 22.1302(c)(4)(i)). The period may be increased if the Director determines that the lengthened period is necessary to protect human health and the environment (Section 22.1302(c)(4)(ii)). During the post-closure care period, the closure cover will be maintained and monitoring activities will be performed as described in the following subsections. 3.2 Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance The integrity of the final cover will be maintained, including the repair of the cover, as necessary to correct the effects of settlement, subsidence, and erosion, and prevent runoff and run-on from damaging the cover. Vegetation shall be mowed at least annually to control the growth of unwanted vegetation that may interfere with integrity of the final cover. All cracked, eroded and uneven areas must be filled and reseeded and ditches maintained (Section 22.1302(b)(1)). Access to the site after closure will be controlled through maintenance of existing fencing and signs, and all access gates will be locked to discourage unauthorized entry. 3.2 Contact Persons The name, address, and telephone number of the person to contact about the ORLF facility during the post-closure period will be provided upon notice of closure. 3.3 Post Closure Cost Estimate An estimate of the cost of performing post-closure activities, based on the estimated cost of hiring a third party to conduct the activities is presented in APPENDIX B. The cost estimate is based on the most expensive costs of post closure care during the post-closure care period. The post-closure cost estimate will be revised annually during the life of the ORLF facility to account for inflation.



3.4 Site Management and Use It is anticipated that upon completion of post-closure care, that the site of the ORLF facility will become open grassland. The actual long-term use of the land will be determined upon notice of closure. The final ORLF facility cover will not be disturbed without prior approval from the Director of the ADEQ. 3.5 Certification of Completion Following the completion of the post-closure care period for the ORLF facility, the Director of the ADEQ will be notified that a certification has been placed in the POR. The certification, signed by an independent registered engineer and approved by the Director of the ADEQ, will verify that post-closure care has been completed in accordance with the post-closure plan (Section 22.1302(f)).

APPENDIX A ESTIMATED CLOSURE COSTS

OWNER: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc. PERMIT No.: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN No.: 75‐00046

OPERATOR: Ozark Ridge Landfill, Inc.



ITEM No.

ITEM QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST SUBTOTALS SOURCE OF UNIT COST INFO

1.0.0

1.1.0Engineering (Design, Bid Documents, Procurement, Construction Contract Mangement) 1 Lump Sum 25,000 25,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.2.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey 45 ACRE 200 9,000$ 2012 Construction Costs

1.3.0Engineering Services (Construction Oversight, Testing, Reporting, Certification) 45 ACRE 4,000 180,000$ Engineer's EstimateProfessional Services Subtotal 214,000$

2.0.02.1.02.1.1 Preparation of landfill to receive cover (final grading) 45 ACRE $1,000.00 45,000$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.1.2Clay, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match earthwork balance) 72,600 CU. YD. $3.25 235,950$ 2012 Construction Cost

2.1.3 Clay, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match earthwork balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/ALow Permeability Soil Layer Subtotal 280,950$

2.2.02.2.1 Drainage material‐‐sand 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A2.2.2 Drainage material‐‐geocomposite 1,960,200 SQ. FT. $0.39 764,478$ 2012 Construction Costs2.2.3 Geomembrane (40 mil) 1,960,200 SQ. FT. $0.29 568,458$ WM Workbook Estimates

Geomembrane and Drainage Layer Subtotal 1,332,936$ 2.3.0

2.3.1 Protective Soil, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match earthwork balance and must be guaranteed for future availability) 114,345 CU. YD. $3.25 371,621$ 2012 Construction Cost

2.3.2 Protective Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) (Quantity must match earthwork balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

2.3.3 Vegetative Soil (Topsoil), On‐site (excavate, transport, place) (Quantity must match earthwork balance and must be guaranteed for future availability) 36,300 CU. YD. $2.65 96,195$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.4 Vegetative Soil (Topsoil), Off‐site (excavate, transport, place) (Quantity must match earthwork balance) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ WM Workbook Estimates

2.3.5 Seeding and mulching 45 ACRE $1,470.00 66,150$ WM Workbook Estimates2.3.6 Fertilizer 45 ACRE $350.00 15,750$ WM Workbook Estimates

Protective Soil and Vegetative Layer Subtotal 549,716$

3.0.03.1.0 Terraces and letdowns 4,000 Lin. FT. $80.00 320,000$ WM Workbook Estimates3.2.0 Checkdams and filters 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ Engineer's Estimate3.3.0 Grass ditching/channels 1,500 Lin. FT. $1.25 1,875$ Engineer's Estimate3.4.0 Riprap ditching/channels (includes rock in mid‐slope benches) 4,000 Lin. FT. $15.00 60,000$ Engineer's Estimate

Erosion Control Subtotal 384,375$

4.0.0

4.1.0 Gas vents, vents, _____ average depth 0 Lin. FT. $0.00 ‐$ N/A4.2.0 Passive System 4.2.1 Passive well head flare 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A4.3.0 Active System 4.3.1 Flare, ___ BTU/hour 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A4.3.2 Additonal Well Installation 20 ACRE $5,000.00 100,000$ 2012 Construction Costs (Assumes 1 well/acre @ $5,000/well)4.3.4 Ancillary gas equipment (piping, blowers, condensate collection) 20 ACRE $4,500.00 90,000$ 2012 Construction Costs (Assumes @ $4,500/acre)

Gas System Subtotal 190,000$

LANDFILL CLOSURE ‐ COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET


LARGEST ACREAGE EVER REQURING FINAL COVER OVER ACTIVE LANDFILL LIFE: 45.0 (i.e., largest acreage ever open at any one time; NOTE: if approved Closure Plan does not include phased closure then largest area is the total permitted disposal acres)

ESTIMATOR: Bryan Bailey DATE: June 30, 2016

ACRES CURRENTLY OPEN: 40.89 (i.e., "open" means areas subject to regulation and have not been certified closed)

Low Permeability Soil Layer

Geomembrane and Drainage Layer

FINAL COVER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Protective Soil and Vegetative Layer

EROSION CONTROL

GAS SYSTEM

Page 1 of 21/11/13

ITEM No.



5.0.05.1.0 Well installation 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A5.2.0 Upgrade existing wells 0 LS $0.00 ‐$ N/A5.3.0 Dedicated pump/sampling system installation/upgrade 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.4.0 Baseline sample collection (4 events per first year, _____ samples per event) 0 EVENT $0.00 ‐$ N/A

5.5.0Baseline sample analysis and reporting (4 events per first year, _____ samples per event)) 0 EVENT $0.00 ‐$ N/AGroundwater Monitoring System Subtotal ‐$

6.0.06.1.0 Additional/upgrades for collection piping 0 Lin. FT $0.00 ‐$ N/A6.2.0 Additonal/upgrades to pumps 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A6.3.0 Additional/upgrades to storage containers 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A6.4.0 Baseline sample collection 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A6.5.0 Baseline sample analysis and reporting 0 EACH $0.00 ‐$ N/A

Leachate Collection System Subtotal ‐$

7.0.07.1.0 Excess solid waste 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A7.2.0 Mobile equipment/machinery (e.g., containers, tanks, etc…) 1 Lump Sum $10,000.00 10,000$ Engineer's Estimate7.3.0 Stored leachate 65,000 GAL. $0.0550 3,575$ Russville City Corp 7.4.0 Contaminated soils 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A

Operations and Inventory Removal Subtotal 13,575$

8.0.08.1.0 Office/shop/maintenace and other ancillary buildings 1 Lump Sum $7,500.00 7,500$ WM Workbook Estimates

8.2.0 Equipment to be decommisioned (e.g., weigh scales, bulking/solidification pits, collection pits/sumps, piping, etc…) 1 Lump Sum $5,000.00 5,000$ Engineer's Estimate

8.3.0 Site Utilities 1 Lump Sum $15,000.00 15,000$ WM Workbook EstimatesDemolition/Removal Site Improvements Subtotal 27,500$

9.0.09.1.0 Fencing 100 Lin. FT. $18.00 1,800$ WM Workbook Estimates9.2.0 Gates 1 Lump Sum $8,000.00 8,000$ WM Workbook Estimates9.3.0 Access barriers 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ WM Workbook Estimates9.4.0 Other security equipment 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500$ Engineer's Estimate

Replace/Rebuild Site Access Controls Subtotal 14,800$

10.0.010.1.0 Regrade and site prep 20 ACRE $1,640.00 32,800$ 2012 Construction Costs10.2.0 Soil, On‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 0 CU.YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A10.3.0 Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 0 CU. YD. $0.00 ‐$ N/A10.4.0 Seeding and mulching 20 ACRE $1,000.00 20,000$ 2012 Construction Costs10.5.0 Fertilizer 20 ACRE $315.00 6,300$ 2012 Construction Costs

Borrow Area Reclamation Subtotal 59,100$ 3,066,952$

11.0.011.1.0 Administration and Contingency $122,678.09 122,678$ WM Workbook Estimates

‐$

Misc. Subtotal 122,678$ 3,189,630$ 3,246,087$ Times inflation factor for 2013 (X 101.77%)3,279,035$ Times inflation factor for 2014 (X 101.015%)3,326,843$ Times inflation factor for 2015 (X 101.458%)UPDATED 2015 CLOSURE COST

MISCELLANEOUS

OPERATIONS AND INVENTORY REMOVAL

DEMOLITION/REMOVAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS

REPLACE/REBUILD SITE ACCESS CONTROLS

Total Closure Cost Subtotal

2013 TOTAL CLOSURE COST 2012 TOTAL CLOSURE COST


GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM

LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM

BORROW AREA RECLAMATION

Page 2 of 21/11/13

APPENDIX B ESTIMATED POST-CLOSURE COSTS

OWNER: Ozark Ridge Landfill, LLC PERMIT NO.: 0225‐S1‐R5 AFIN: 75‐00046

OPERATOR: Ozrak Ridge Landfill, LLC



ITEM No.


1.0.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1.1.0

Engineering (Annual inspection and reporting, corrective action design and bid, contract management) 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.2.0Topographic and Boundary Survey (annual, final, and corrective action, if required) 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

1.3.0Corrective Action Engineering Services (Construction Oversight, Testing, Reporting, Certification) 1 Lump Sum $28,200.00 28,200.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesProfessional Services Annual Subtotal 33,200.00$

2.0.0 FINAL COVER ROUTINE MAINTENANCE2.1.0 Inspect soil cover, vents, flares, drainage letdowns and outfalls, etc... 2 Event $2,500.00 5,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates2.2.0 Mowing/Trimming 66 ACRE $50.00 3,300.00$ WM Workbook Estimates2.3.0 Clean Drain/Vent Openings 2 Event $2,075.00 4,150.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Final Cover Routine Maintenance Annual Subtotal 12,450.00$ 3.0.0 FINAL COVER REPAIRS3.1.0

Remove/incorporate unacceptable materials (e.g., dead vegetation, solid waste) 5 ACRE $50.00 250.00$ Engineers Estimate

3.2.0 Scarify and prepare surface 5 ACRE $1,640.00 8,200.00$ 2012 Construction Costs3.3.0 Soil, On‐Site (excavate, transport, place, compact) 3,500 CU. YD. $3.25 11,375.00$ WM Workbook Estimates3.4.0 Soil, Off‐site (excavate, transport, place, compact) CU. YD. ‐$ N/A3.5.0 Seeding and mulching 5 ACRE $3,200.00 16,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates3.6.0 Fertilizer 5 ACRE $800.00 4,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Final Cover Repairs Annual Subtotal 39,825.00$

4.0.0 ACCESS ROADS REPAIRS4.1.0 Reshape/regrade subgrade 3,000 SQ. FT. $2.00 6,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate4.2.0 Gravel (transport, place, compact) 200 TON $30.00 6,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate4.3.0 Drainage Structures (e.g., culverts, 1 LS $2,500.00 2,500.00$ Engineer's Estimate4.4.0 Riprap ditching/channels 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

Access Roads Repair Annual Subtotal 15,500.00$

5.0.0 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)5.1.0

Collection system operation and maintenance (ditches, piping conveyances, outfalls, sampling points repair/replace) 1 Lump Sum $2,000.00 2,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

5.2.0 Stormwater storage (sediment pond) operation/repairs 1 Lump Sum $1,200.00 1,200.00$ Engineer's Estimate5.3.0 Sample collection ( 2 events per year) 2 Event $500.00 1,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates5.4.0 Sample analysis and reporting ( 2 events per year) 2 Event $500.00 1,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Surface Water Management O&M Annual Subtotal 5,200.00$

6.0.0 LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM O&MGeneration Rate = 125,000 gal/yr.

6.1.0Collection operation/maintenance (pump, piping, storage...operation/repair/replace) 1 YEAR $2,000.00 2,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

6.2.0Leachate loading, off‐loading and off‐site transportation Event ‐$ Russelville City Corp

6.3.0 Leachate Treatment/Disposal 125,000 Gal. $0.0550 6,875.00$ WM Workbook Estimates6.4.0 Additional/upgrades for piping, pumps and storage 1 Lump Sum $3,000.00 3,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates6.5.0 Leachate sample collection 1 YEAR $1,500.00 1,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates6.6.0 Leachate sample analysis and reporting 1 YEAR $5,000.00 5,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Leachate Collection System O&M Annual Subtotal 18,375.00$

7.0.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM O&MNumber of Wells in Approved System = 8

LANDFILL POST‐CLOSURE CARE ‐ ANNUAL COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET


ESTIMATOR: Bryan Bailey DATE: June 30, 2016

Page 1 of 21/11/13

ITEM No.



7.1.0Well maintenance (e.g., protective casing (lock & hinges) repair/replacement, well pad repair/replace, etc…) 1 LS $650.00 650.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

7.2.0 Upgrade/redevelop existing wells 1 LS $320.00 320.00$ WM Workbook Estimates7.3.0 Well Replacement 1 LS $333.00 333.00$ WM Workbook Estimates7.4.0 Sample collection (2 events per year) 2 Event $3,800.00 7,600.00$ WM Workbook Estimates7.5.0 Sample analysis and reporting (2 events per year) 2 Event $6,500.00 13,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Groundwater Monitoring System O&M Annual Subtotal 21,903.00$

8.0.0 GAS MONITORING SYSTEM O&M8.1.0 Number of Gas Monitoring Probes/Wells = 48.2.0 Methane monitoring of probes/wells (4 per year) 4 Event $560.00 2,240.00$ WM Workbook Estimates8.3.0 Methane monitoring at site boundary and structures (4 per year) 4 Event $420.00 1,680.00$ WM Workbook Estimates8.4.0 Sample analysis and reporting 4 Event $145.00 580.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

Gas Monitoring System O&M Annual Subtotal 4,500.00$

9.0.0 GAS EXTRACTION SYSTEM O&M9.1.0 Passive System 9.1.1 Passive well head flare maintenance 1 EACH $2,500.00 2,500.00$ WM Workbook Estimates9.2.0 Active System 9.2.1 Flare, BTU/hour 1 EACH $9,000.00 9,000.00$ WM Workbook Estimates9.2.2 Additional Well Installation/Upgrades 1 EACH $850.00 850.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

9.2.3Ancillary gas equipment repair/replacement (piping, blowers, condensate collection) 1 Lump Sum $1,200.00 1,200.00$ WM Workbook EstimatesGas Extraction System O&M Annual Subtotal 13,550.00$

10.0.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION10.1.0

Resurvey monitoring well reference points and site benchmarks (prorate for annual expenses) 1 EACH $2,200.00 2,200.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.2.0 Remove sediments from stormwater basin(s) (prorate for annual expenses) 1 EACH $3,500.00 3,500.00$ Engineer's Estimate10.3.0 Groundwater exceedances statistical evaluation 1 EACH $2,000.00 2,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate

10.4.0 Groundwater alternate source determination) (prorate for annual expenses) 1 EACH $5,000.00 5,000.00$ Engineer's Estimate10.5.0 Groundwater compliance monitoring (prorate for annual expense) 8 EACH $2,400.00 19,200.00$ WM Workbook Estimates

10.6.0Other: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EACH ‐$ Corrective Action Evaluation and Implementation Annual Subtotal 31,900.00$

Total Post‐Closure Care Annual Cost Subtotal 196,403.00$ 11.0.0 MISCELLANEOUS11.1.0 Administration and Contingency 7,856.12$

$ $

Misc. Subtotal $TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL POST‐CLOSURE CARE COST 204,259.12$

6,127,773.60$

1,225,554.72$

6,236,235.19$

1,247,247.04$

6,299,532.98$

1,259,907$

6,391,380$

1,278,276$

30 x "Total Estimated Annual Post‐Closure Care Cost".ESTIMATED 30 YEAR POST‐CLOSURE CARE PERIOD



CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 2012 20% of Total Post‐Closure Care Cost





Page 2 of 21/11/13