21
1 Dan Graur Molecular Molecular Evolutionary Evolutionary Analysis Analysis

Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

  • Upload
    akina

  • View
    32

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Molecular Evolutionary Analysis. Dan Graur. 1959. Q: We may ask the question where in the now living systems the greatest amount of information of their past history has survived and how it can be extracted? A: Best fit are the macromolecules which carry the genetic information. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

1

Dan Graur

Molecular Molecular Evolutionary Evolutionary AnalysisAnalysis

Page 2: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

2

1959

Page 3: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

3

Page 4: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

4

Q: We may ask the question where in the now living systems the greatest amount of information of their past history has survived and how it can be extracted?

A: Best fit are the macromolecules which carry the genetic information.

Molecules as documents of evolutionary history

Page 5: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

5

PalimpsestPalimpsest

Page 6: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

6

Sydney Brenner

“Searching for an objective reconstruction of the vanished past is surely the most challenging task in biology.”

“In one sense, everything in biology has already been ‘published’ in the form of DNA sequences of genomes.”

1991

Page 7: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

7

Assumption: Assumption: Life is Life is

monophyleticmonophyletic

Page 8: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

8

Any two organisms share a common ancestor in their past

ancestor

descendant 1 descendant 2

Page 9: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

9

ancestor

Some organisms have very recent ancestors.

(5 MYA)

Page 10: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

10

ancestor(18 MYA)

Some have less recent ancestors…

Page 11: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

11

ancestor(120 MYA)

…and less recent.

Page 12: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

12

ancestor(1,500 MYA)

But, any two organisms share a common ancestor in their past

Page 13: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

13

The The differences differences between 1 between 1 and 2and 2 are the result of changes changes on the on the lineage lineage leading to leading to descendant descendant 11 ++ those those on the on the lineage lineage leading to leading to descendant descendant 2.2.

ancestor

descendant 1 descendant 2

Page 14: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

14

Step 1:Step 1:Sequence Alignment

Page 15: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

15

Page 16: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

Step 2:Step 2: Translating number of differences number of differences into number of changesnumber of changes (steps).

Page 17: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

17

Example:1. the number of nucleotide substitutions per site between two non-coding sequences (K) according to Kimura’s two parameter model

Page 18: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

18

KS = −3

4ln 1−

4MS3NS

⎣ ⎢ ⎢

⎦ ⎥ ⎥

Example:2. the number of synonymous nucleotide substitution per synonymous site between two coding sequences (KS) according to Jukes and Cantor’s one parameter model

Page 19: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

19

KA = −3

4ln 1−

4MA3NA

⎣ ⎢ ⎢

⎦ ⎥ ⎥

Example: the number of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution per nonsynonymous site between two coding sequences (KA) according to Jukes and Cantor’s one parameter model

Page 20: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

20Ki

Ki = number of

substitutions (or replacements) of type i per number of sites of type i per 2T

Page 21: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis

21

ri =Ki

2T

Ki

r = rate of substitution = number of substitutions per site per year