52
PHONE: (612) 894-9359 J ' LINDA 1. LEHMAN, P. G. H N Z CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGIST 5168 W. 141st STREET' |MytueftwmoL Vils Proici_ ___'_l April 17, 1985 CENTER 4.N- Russell Jim '85 APR 22 P2 : 55 )istribution: Yakima Indian Nation P.O. Box 151 ... 7- .Toppenish, Washington 98948 (Retu(rRe tu o WM, ok RE: April 4th technical meeting on BWIP geology and hydrologic CGC: 4o -6o testing plans Dear Russell, The technical meeting was for the most part a rehashing of major project plans for the benefit of new participants. RHO gave their usual slide shows and handed out copies of the view graphs _ (attached). The locations of planned seismic and magnetic surveys are-shown in the attachments as well as well locations and types -- of tests planned. RHO did not go into a lot of detail. It seems there were conflicting meetings so the usual large DOE and RHO contingent was not present. Dave Dahlem ran the meeting for DOE and most presentations were done by Sue Price, Steve Baker or Steve Strait. Basically, what transpired was Bill Brewer argued with RHO concerning the coincidence of earthquake swarms and structural features. He produced a set of maps with overlays which showed the earthquake swarms located at triple junctures of known fractures or faults. The faults and fractures were taken from U-2 photos, Side Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) and all other data that Brewer had collected. I asked him for a set of maps but he didn't have enough copies, so I think we should officially request them. (Draft request is attached.) It appears that DOE and RHO have decided to fund the Washington State University (WSU) geophysical well logging-proposal. It seems that Jeff Brown from Pullman will be involved, which seemed to please Brewer. Although details were not discussed, it appeared that the proposed work will be done by WSU, as opposed to RHO, but RHO may still be controlling the purse strings. Brewer also requested a new higher resolution SLAR survey be done on the Hanford site since the Texas sites were getting one. RHO seemed interested in this, possibly as a joint venture between Washington State and DOE. ' PDR

|MytueftwmoL Vils Proici ' l April 17, 1985 CENTER 4.N- · GeoTrans. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Basalt Waste Isolation Project Project Status Meeting on Geosciences Studies

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PHONE: (612) 894-9359 J '

LINDA 1. LEHMAN, P. G. H N ZCONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGIST

5168 W. 141st STREET'

|MytueftwmoL Vils Proici_ ___'_lApril 17, 1985 CENTER 4.N-

Russell Jim '85 APR 22 P2 :55 )istribution:Yakima Indian NationP.O. Box 151 ... 7-

.Toppenish, Washington 98948 (Retu(rRe tu o WM, ok

RE: April 4th technical meeting on BWIP geology and hydrologic CGC: 4o -6otesting plans

Dear Russell,

The technical meeting was for the most part a rehashing of majorproject plans for the benefit of new participants. RHO gave theirusual slide shows and handed out copies of the view graphs

_ (attached). The locations of planned seismic and magnetic surveysare-shown in the attachments as well as well locations and types --

of tests planned. RHO did not go into a lot of detail. It seemsthere were conflicting meetings so the usual large DOE and RHOcontingent was not present. Dave Dahlem ran the meeting for DOEand most presentations were done by Sue Price, Steve Baker orSteve Strait.

Basically, what transpired was Bill Brewer argued with RHOconcerning the coincidence of earthquake swarms and structuralfeatures. He produced a set of maps with overlays which showedthe earthquake swarms located at triple junctures of knownfractures or faults. The faults and fractures were taken from U-2photos, Side Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) and all other data thatBrewer had collected. I asked him for a set of maps but he didn'thave enough copies, so I think we should officially request them.(Draft request is attached.)

It appears that DOE and RHO have decided to fund the WashingtonState University (WSU) geophysical well logging-proposal. Itseems that Jeff Brown from Pullman will be involved, which seemedto please Brewer. Although details were not discussed, itappeared that the proposed work will be done by WSU, as opposed toRHO, but RHO may still be controlling the purse strings.

Brewer also requested a new higher resolution SLAR survey be doneon the Hanford site since the Texas sites were getting one. RHOseemed interested in this, possibly as a joint venture betweenWashington State and DOE.

' PDR

I took the opportunity to criticize the boundary conditions usedin the RHO model and the Interagency approach and mentioned thatour studies indicate the Yakima Valley to be geochemicallydistinct from the Pasco Basin. To my surprise, Baker agreed withmy statements. He said he also believed the Yakima Ridge was aground-water divide and agreed that the USGS use of Sadis Creekand areas in the Yakima Valley were not adequate for boundarycondition determination.

I also criticized the fact that RHO had extremely limited fieldmeasurements of head in deeper units outside the HanfordReservation. I also stated we considered field measurements ofboundary conditions to be mandatory to verifying flow pathpredictions. Baker asked if we expected RHO to ring the PascoBasin with wells. I stated that some wells would be necessary atkey locations but we did not expect a lot of them. They thenasked where I would place them. I said that modeling work couldbe undertaken to help determine optimal well locations and that wewould certainly like-to participate in these decisions. Theyseemed amenable to this. Therefore, we should undertake someadditional tasks to investigate these locations in next year'scontract.

Basically, my conclusions regarding the meeting are as follows:

1) It was productive from the standpoint that we got todiscuss some of our technical conclusions in the-EA whichwill influence site characterization work planned by RHO.

2) The presentations themselves did not tell'us anything newexcept locations of geophysical surveys.

3) It was also apparent that we need to get an RFP outquickly for a tectonics oriented firm to follow thegeology aspects more closely.

4) Some new contract tasks should be investigated for FY 86.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call.

Sincerely,

Linda Lehman

Attachments

cc: Jim HovisDean TousleyV. V. NguyenGeoTrans

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYBasalt Waste Isolation Project

Project Status Meeting on Geosciences Studies8:30 a.m.. Thursday. April 4. 1985

Room G-53, Federal Building, Richland

Introduction - 0. H. Dahlem (BWIPO)

Description of Current Activities (BWIP)

o Geology - S. M. Priceo Rock Mechanics - D. J. Doddso Hydrology - S. M. Bakero Near Field Geochemistry - S. M. Baker

Special Topic - Upper Cold Creek SynclineHydrologic Barrier Study (BWIP)

o Status - S. R. StraitA. M. Tallman

- Hydrologic Studies- Gravity and Magnetic Surveys- Borehole DH-27 and DH-28 Results- Alternative Interpretations

o Planned Studies - S. R. StraitA. M. Tallman

- Ground Gravity and Magnetic Surveys- Seismic Reflection Testing and Verification- Deepening of Current Boreholes and Additional

Hydrologic Testing- Additional Studies

Future Topics for Discussion

.j

ATTENDEE LIST

Anne M. Tallman

Steve Baker

Ron T. Halfmoon

Sean C. Muller

Pat Boileau

John Hutchins

Phil Brown

Bill Price

Jim Bazemore

Art Lassila

Dan Clayton

Phil Long

Ray Lasmanis

Bill Brewer

Linda Lehman

Tom Tinsley

Ellen Caywood

Bruce Hurley

Rockwell

Rockwell

Nez Perce Tribe

Council of Energy Resource Tribes

DOE-RL

Council of Energy Resource Tribes

Council of Energy Resource Tribes

Rockwell

Rockwell

DOE-RL

-Shainnon & Wilson for DOE

Rockwell

State Nuclear Waste Board

State of Wash.-Nuclear Waste Mgmt

Yakima Indian Nation

DOE-RL

Joint Science & Tech. Comm.

DOE-RL

NRC

Rockwell

DOE-RL

Rockwell

(509)376-8712

(509)376-4764

(208)843-2253

(303)832-6600

(509)376-5039

(303)832-6600

(303)832-6600

(509)373-4521

(509)376-9188

(509)376-6158

(2061633-5079

(509)376-6246

(206)459-6372

(206)459-6670

(612)894-9359

(509)376-8736

(206)786-7285

(509)376-7059

FTS 444-7059

(509)943-4669

(509)373-4226

(509)376-3022

FTS 444-3022

(509)376-2421

FTS 444-2421

F. R.

Steve

David

Cook

StraitH. Dahlem

Sue M. Price

C. , - - - .- .

-* pLAAjAJEF) GoPpJystcALr S3VIJ'Eces

ArA Gs f0w) I A.) ^SPf 4LToPf4AF3Dvvr7,

GEOLOGICCHARACTERIZATION

STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGIC INTEGRATION TECTONICS

* SUBBASALT . . STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY*GEOMETRIC

* BASALT FRAMEWORK . PAST AND PRESENTDEFORMATION

_ INTERBEDS 'DYNAMIC MODE * SEIMOLOY

* SUPRABASALT DEVELOPMENT oSIALG

**THICKNE SSARIATONS INPUT TO DESIGN, * TECTONIC MODELSPERFORANCE MODEL EVALUATIONI

MODEL DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT *D__EVE__LOPMENT

INTRAFLOW STRUCTURE GEOMPHOLOGY* TYPES* DISTRIBUTION * SURFICIAL GEOLOGY*.MODEL DEVELOPMENT

CHA_ * SURFICIAL PROCESSES* FRECUENCY * EROSIONAL INCISION* DIMENSIONS PO TENTIAL* INFILLING* MODEL DEVELOPMENT

ROCK CHEMISTRY ECONOMIC GEOLOGY* PRIMARY/SECONDARY

MINERALOGY OF ASALT * MINERAL RESOURCE* MINERALOGY Of OCCURRENCE

_INTERBEDf _

* MINERALOGY OFALTERED BASALT

* MINERALOGY OF FAULTINFILUNG MATERIALS

* MODEL DEVELOPMENT

* COMPARATIVE VALUEESTIMATION

* INADVERTANTINTRUSION POTENTIAL

STRATIGRAPHY4-,

OBJECTIVES

o DEVELOP GRAPHIC, THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS OF THERRL AND VICINITY

O IDENTIFY STRATIGRAPHIC FEATURES POTENTIALLY CONTROLLINGGROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM GEOMETRY AND AFFECTING DESIGN

ACTIVITIES

O BASALT

- UPDATE OF DATA PACKAGE DP-035, "DEEP BOREHOLE STRATIGRAPHICCORRELATION CHARTS'

- DOCUMENTATION OF FRENCHMAN SPRINGS MEMBER STRATIGRAPHYPQua A" - ,ZAL d tzc _ A, > ,?71 d , _ t 5 amO SUPRABASALT

- ISOPACH AND STRUCTURE CONTOUR MAPS OF SUPRABASALT UNITSWITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE RRL

- STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION MEASUREMENTS AND CORRELATIONS OFTHE SOUTHERN WHITE BLUFFS

- CORRELATION OF ASH HORIZONS

O INTERBEDS

- INTERBED CORRELATION STUDIES- PETROGRAPHIC EXAMINATION OF INTERBEDS

4"

ITNRAFLOW STRUCTURE ANDFRACTURE CHARACTERIZATION

OBJECTIVES

O IDENTIFY NATURE AND PROBABLE EXTENT OF INTRAFLOW STRUCTURES (it\> , Co)AND FRACTURES IN THE CANDIDATE HORIZON FLOWS OF THE RRL

O DEVELOP GRAPHIC AND STATISTICAL MODELS OF THE OCCURRENCE OFINTRAFLOW STRUCTURES AND FRACTURES WITHIN THE RRL FOR THEPURPOSE OF EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF SUCH OCCURRENCEON FLOW GEOMETRY AND RADIONUCLIDE TRANSPORT

ACTIVITIES

O INTRAFLOW STRUCTURES

- UPDATE OF DATA PACKAGE DP-011.. "GEOLOGIC THICKNESS DATA--CANDIDATE REPOSITORY HORIZONS

- DOCUMENTATION OF "STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND COOLING HISTORYOF COLUMBIA RIVER BASALT FLOWS ' i*r op Aa. iacr - Ror A Act ar-ErteauvSTED A °oPY

od-rAu4o -

- REPOSITORYSTUDIES -

LAYOUT STUDY AND INPUT TO SUBSEQUENT DESIGNCoNAsSEr FLOW 66LBOW EDS (cCC0L WOAJVE

- CORE RELOGGING - REVISED PeOCcjbE M'

- INTRAFLOW STRUCTURE OUTCROP STUDIES, SENTINEL GAP AREA CLNOr C kElyLV USEAR UA#J7A6ES50 dATA Pft (atMA ) AJECDED M 1Ac7's%'Ce_ jASi'YAACA

P't(%Aeq Ar-Mro9Z - /As Pt otATY

I

O FRACTURE CHARACTERIZATION

- DOCUMENTATION OF DETAILED FRACTURE-WIDTH MEASUREMENTSTUDY - Q0ILL .F our /M AJSXKT (6 ms. Jt: 30,Coo M EAT.

- SUPPORT TO NEAR SURFACE TEST FACILITY OVERCORING ( MWOCKtUP OF (a' SHAFr - MOPltOAJrA(D~emo twoLCA ARE AoG4-cro FOPL uVCW(L rAXTV. lqocs P Adz SOAFr)- 7ESr EQu tem- CORE RELOGGING

- FRACTURE OUTCROP STUDIES, SENTINEL GAP

ROCK ClIEISTRY

OBJECTIVES

O DEVELOP MINERALoGIC DATA TO SUPPORT ESTIMATION OF SORPTIONPROPERTIES AND GEOCHEMICAL CONDITIONS IN THE WASTE PACKAGEENVIRONMENT

O OBTAIN DATA TO SUPPORT GEOCHEMICAL MODELING OF GROUNDWATEREVOLLUION

ACTIVITIES

O MINERALOGY OF INTERBEDS STUDY

O STATUS REPORT ON SECONDARY MINERALS IN FUW TOPS

pAT;A CO C 0 DoWAJ If-E COLb ESKI SyAJWJ AS WELE. 4$

TECTONIC CHPRACTERIZATION

OBJECTIVES

O PROVIDE STRUCTURAL, SEISMICITY, AND IN SITU STRESS DATAFOR INPUT TO RESPOSITORY DESIGN

O ASSIST IN THE ESTIMATION OF THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS THATSTRUCTURES AND TECTONIC PROCESSES MIGHT HAVE ONGROUNDWATER FLOW PATHS AND TRAVEL TIME

O PROVIDE INPUT TO AN EVALUATION OF THE OIL AND GAS POTENTIALOF THE RRL AND VICINITY

ACTIVITIES

O STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY - DEFIAJE -96oMAoJs.Y FeATOer oC To6 iS) .

- TECTONIC MAP UPDATE - COPIES DRLL GE rAADE AVUAIL^h1Lf SOL0

- TOP-OF-BASALT MAP UPDATE / - 61JS

STATE MAP COMPILATION INPUT- STATEWIDE GRAVITY STATION COMPILATION - aO°f VFFA £ sT -SCA7 -OBTAIN F fuses- LONG OFFSET REFRACTION SURVEY - i0oH0f, MALoVE ALSO XtC&'AIS - P4Wio#Mj SSA AvsJV5, 0556- MT SURVEY - z8e ws0run ,'u ,IictAjV of: AAr SAKE Mr n

- GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY FILE DATA EVALUATION- OAfCOA&G OT~CI CEUWAOI)- GRIDDED GRAVITY SURVEY - 60&Igr r1¶AF IS Our

- SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY TEST- YAKIMA BARRICADE STUDY- HORSE HEAVEN HILLS STUDY - ftilE. j4A' &.ceb SGwO4 CoMPUETE TNE6S IS AVAIUE- SNIVELY BASIN STUDY- VANTAGE ANALOG STUDY

O PAST AND PRESENT DEFORMATION

- USGS OPEN FILE REPORT 84-797, "CRUSTAL DEFORMATION NEARHANFORD, WASHINGTON

- STRUCTURAL ROTATION STUDY - §MAqL Fl.in FR SANrTA RAqA IS OWN& 7711S W00et

)- 2 RELIC S Our - A'sAJ 71Al(^J 6a- 6-We AE .e - Wa- Z70

- A gtotow ul* /S gooAuf AD.

O SEISMOLOGY

- REGIONAL EASTERN WASHINGTON NETWORKE WIP BASELINE NETWORKSArjjSo TPOFISAT- A "S- SHALLOW BOREHOLE SEISMIC NETWORK, RRL 6 57~rA'5 AI P8S) r- DJEEP BOREHOLE SEISMOMETER pC.'3 WILL 3- jwIASTAUr-I 'r#lS FAU. (Sr) Ar leg~d-SiCr4Y D6PT/i'- PROCESSING OF EARTHQUAKE RECORDS

- SEISMIC DESIGN WORKING GROUP - wcODwAtO CLYDE- DOCUMENTATION OF SEISMIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

o TECTONIC MbDELSIe .. I

- USGS MEETINGS ON INTERRELATED TOPICS OF TECTONICS,SEISMICITY, AND IN SITU STRESS

- ASSESSMENT OF TECTONIC MODELS BASED ON EVALUATION OFEXISTING AND NEW DATA - 4(c"-r M"'Wer6v orrhw OSGSAVA^ILAJ9LV .

( FAWL M t5T7AP6) LE rrSt PFat USCZ6

GOMORPHIOLOGY

OBJECTIVES

O ASSESS NET EFFECT OF SURFICIAL GEOLOGY PROCESSES - P-p suede Q op-T

0 o PROVIDE SUPPORT TO TECTONI.CS AND PALEOCLIMATOLOGYCONSIDERATIONS

ACTIVITIES

O DOCUMENTAtION OF PALEODRAINAGE OF COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM - AL eL E f- r JI dJ3b/Al-r rFOl 7£cL5# '

O INPUT TO PALEOCLIMATOLOGY PLANNING

O INPUT TO TECTONIC EVALUATION OF QUATERNARY HISTORY

l

ECONOMIC GEOLOGYOBJECTIVES

O LOCATE AND DESCRIBE OCCURRENCES OF MINERAL RESOURCESINCLUDING THEIR PAST EXPLOITATION OR FUTUREEXPLOITABILITY

O MAKE VALUE ESTIMATES OF KNOWN AND POTENTIAL RESOURCESAND COMPARE THESE TO OTHER AREAS OF SIMILAR SIZE INTHE COLUMBIA PLATEAU REGION

ACTIVITIES

O MONITOR OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION MAS A R-foQ A~dtCJ WILL &E O s

O EVALUATION OF RECENT OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION WELLS

O EVALUATION OF MT DATA

O BASALT MARGIN STUDY

HYDA01Wt-P-MA I-00mcl 4T's 11,4,rflr

WASH S17 6 tf"A 4 MfP #4tC bV S tW " 4PA *flCofA# y gooD 6-o e 1e~q a > tc.

7kA7m44 fdAfrlOAAVA) Sn2aiES vrw S& 61AITe&)AZ vER ECroICJS ree$ s

IVASN 5sr47 - S t'olm6 7#/1S .

koerczc& PoAa6- /71aE,-,wiE AMd.4y-rIS1507toT'C: AALYSE9 AeC #A°j PsE

- ka DA7d f Siqapf s/3 A ter

_ .

... .... ...........

*

GEOLOGIC INTEGRATION

OBJECTIVES

o PROVIDE GEOLOGIC DATA BASE

o DEVELOP GEOLOGIC MODELS OF THE SITE THAT INCLUDE PART, OR ALL OFTHE RESULTS OF THE OTHER GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIES

ACTIVITIES

O MAP INTEGRATION EFFORT- SEeiS F ctiA h gEP&E

O PRELIMINARY THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL MODEL OFTHE RRL (INPUT TO DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT)

O SEISMIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

O SCENARIO EVALUATION

I

0GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION

(SUMMARY OF DATA NEEDS AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS)LITHOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION GEOLOGIC INTEGRATION TECTONIC CHARACTERIZATION

EAFAsESSMENTtDESIGN

MODEL! ^i / ~DEVELOPMEN\ ~STRU TU~t \

*3 DIMENSIONAL_ M NODEL

*DESIGN INPUTGIAOUNDWATERFLWW

z wS~YSTEM INPU.T/

: .~SEISMIC DESIGN INPUT \**SCENARIO INPUT

(PARAMETERS/PROBABI LITIES1

oINUTro DSG

AND.PERFORMANCE

/ LOCATIONC"ARACTERISTIC

DATABASEelMODELBS

I

li

SEISMOLOGY*/ SURVEILLANCE PAST AND PRESENT* SUVEILANCEDEFORMATION* ASSOC. WITH' -IIGAE AE

STRUCTUES TIING ANO RATI* RECURRENCE * l MECKANIS

\- GROUND MOTION a MODELS

TECTONIC MODELS

* MODEL EVALUATI0N/DEVELOPMENT

* DISRUPTIVESCENARIOS

-

ENGINEERING BARRIERS GEOCHEMISTRY OBJECTIVES

o QUANTIFY THE ENGINEERED BARRIER GEOCHEMISTRY ENVIRONMENT ASEFFECTED BY WASTE PACKAGE EMPLACEMENT

O QUANTIFY THE GEOCHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF IMPORTANT RADIONUCLIDESIN THE ENGINEERED BARRIER SYSTEM

0o ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF GEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES ON THE RADIONU-CLIDE ISOLATION CAPABILITIES OF THE ENGINEERED BARRIER SYSTEM

e

i.

CURRENT LABORATORY ACTIVITIES

o SPENT FUEL/BASALT/GROUNDWATER HYDROTHERMAL EXPERIMENTS ATEXPECTED REPOSITORY TEMPERATURES TO QUANTIFY RADIONUCL IDEBEHAVIOR IN THE-WASTE PACKAGE

O CONTAINER MATERIAL CORROSION EXPERIMENTS UNDER EXPECTEDREPOSITORY CONDITIONS (HYDROTHERMAL AND STEAM ENVIRONMENTS)TO MEASURE CORROSION RATES

O PACKING MATERIAL/GROUNDWATER HYDROTHERMAL EXPERIMENTS TOMEASURE CHEMICAL STABILITY OF PACKING MATERIAL

O SORPTION/SOLUBIL ITY EXPERIMENTS WITH BASALT/PACKING MATERIALAND RADIONUCLIOE-BEARING GROUNDWATER TO QUANTIFY RADIONUCLIDEMOBILITY IN THE PACKING MATERIAL

I I

GENERAL OBJECTIVES: HYDROLOGIC INVESTIGATION

GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM

O FLOW PATHS

- FLOW TOPS

- STRUCTURES

- INTERBEDS

- DENSE INTERIORS

O FLOW POTENTIAL

- CURRENT WATER LEVELS

- HYDRAULIC STRESS

- WATER USE n e-l Lro st(.E 'orvr, L-- CLIMATIC CHANGE

o HYDROCHEMICAL EVOLUTION

- FLOW SYSTEM HISTORY INTEGRATED OVER TIME AND SPACE- CONCEPTUAL FLOW MODEL

O SOLUTE TRANSPORT

- SPECIATION

- RADIONUCLIDE RETARDATION

- SOLUBILITY

BWIP HYDROGEOLOGY PROGRAM

[ HYDROGEOLOGICCHARACTERIZATION l

I IPHYSICAL

HYDROGEOLOGYI-

HYDROCHEMISTRY DATA BASEMANAGEPIENT

REGIONALFLOW

SYSTEM

SITE - SPECIFICPARAtETER

IDENTIFICATION- FLOW

INTERPRETATIONS

- RETRIEVABILITY- TRACEABILITY- CORRELATIONS

_ .

- BOUNDARYCONDI TI ONSFORPERFORMANCESCALE MODELS

- PERFORMANCEPARAMETERS

- TRANSPORTPARAMETERS

REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM

OBJECTIVES

O GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM

o RANGE OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE SCALE ACTIVITIES

ACTIVITIES

O FIELD DATA COLLECTION

- REGIONAL HYDRAULIC STRESS ASSESSMENT WITH TIME (USGS)

- REGIONAL WELL WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (USGS)

- HANFORD WATER LEVEL MONITORING

- POLLEN ANALYSES (LAKE BED CORES) PLANNED

O CLIMATOLOGY STUDIES (BEING PLANNED)

- PREDICT POSSIBLE RANGE OF CLIMATE CONDITIONS

- CALIBRATE THE PREDICTIONS TO PAST CLIMATE

O REGIONAL FLOW SYSTEM STUDIES

- INTERAGENCY HYDROLOGY WORKING GROUP (EXTENDED PASCO BASIN)- REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM PARAMETER ESTIMATION STUDY BEING

PLANNED (INCLUDES STRUCTURAL CONTROL)

PROPOSED REGIONAL INVESTIGATION LOGIC

SITE - SPECIFIC PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM

OBJECTIVES

o DETERMINE GROUNDWATER FLOW POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE

O DETERMINE THREE DIMENSIONAL HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES

- CONDUCTIVITIES OF FLOW PATHS

- EFFECTIVE POROSITY

- STORAGE COEFFICIENT

- DISPERSION

ACTIVITIES

O GROUNDATER MONITORING

o LARGE-SCALE HYDRAULIC STRESS TESTS PLANNED

O TRACER TESTS

O SMALL SCALE HYDRAULIC STRESS TESTS

O EXPLORATORY SHAFT TESTING PLANNED

LOGIC DIAGRAM FOR BWIP HYDROLOGIC TEST STRATEGY "'(AFTER NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, 1983)

STAGE I STAGE X STAGt3 STAGE A-

1ceOIllws"JI11e4catl

PR~ IauMAis410S."CU

oISI4*t(I

SIVIV4iDGWit polinf.Mlgm

I100 11_E

$I CO GRUUI UI m6 mmt

I I CCUUDNo Its 1,461 1 wm oc'SV

AeagvtI111 f %I 1NIVAIWAII PI(tRIS

I-I lue 1c2

! fWD4*4 AlaD .,1* v

I I 1%W# AlNDhlltl _aII Tit~ 1A~a"il"pa ~saul

IWollfoPal *k locl.

$ ICK tj -1441 U4 O

I o6l (A al O Ctgledi

ac &"Al If I S

V U I. :PII l, I

I

of $):.Io &IN W J1 IFISlAI P11I0IOJII WE~

IC 11C.11A.C.4oit8114.O.C.

is

NO 44

1

of Ivallus It DfUG"of 11161 woo

0 facoldols

t

I ____ T_P-It

a Iclqttcl awOlvoluat,1tkItabls

E

too

.BA~lIis

G *.o1t. h1161 c"AcGALI OIS WDC(PUAS INNA IDON4 N Wi at Noa ("~uOf in vit W. a got

1011140 11 M fI ~ a mt,. Ol l lt 3* ,1 O

ftllc 11164,01. IA fiUl Atoll NoC vot*

-Pt tg t~o to utI a , VAN 1fllISPAPA

IWoDIt A0111WAIAPIJMA

I N IVHu i CI%'I A j

VI%

111161410 0 a

I1 u I Il

aPt avfll T0,a it1 0111 PK OIO a

rr

(11"llHVORAIA ICwtiller. en.k

1811 (C1AILAC111111eO1" I_gI

HYDROCHEMISTRY

OBJECTIVES

O UNDERSTANDING THE GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM

O ESTABLISH GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY BASELINE FOR OTHER SITE CHARACTERIZATIONACTIVITIES

O DETERMINE RADIONUCLIDE RETARDATION PARAMETERS FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTACTIVITIES

ACTIVITIES

O GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY BASELINE FOR PRECIPITATION, SPRINGS. UNCONFINEDAQUIFER. CONFINED FLOW SYSTEMS

- MAJOR. MINOR TRACE PARAMETER CONCENTRATIONS

- STABLE AND RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPE CONCENTRATIONS

- DISSOLVED GAS CONCENTRATIONS

- ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS

O CONCEPTUAL GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL

- SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHEMISTRY PARAMETERS

- GEOCHEMICAL MODELING - FoP3 - EQ( rT m LLsDVf XT LL

- DETERMINE FLOW DIRECTIONS AND GENERAL FLOW RATES

O LAB RADIONUCLIDE RETARDATION STUDIES: BATCH AND COLUMN

- SORPTION/DESORPTION

- SOLUBILITY

- COMPLEXATION

- SPECIATION

O FIELD SCALE RADIONUCLIDE TRANSPORT STUDIES (BEING PLANNED)

- TRACER TESTS

- NATURAL RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATION

- NATURAL PARTICULATES

HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION PLANPHYSICAL HYDROLOGY HYDROCHEMISTRY

DEVELOPMENT OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE

14S

14:C0IL

Sat

0-1u-

5

aml

44

10z

Iszusa

111(111CONFIMUNCEDATA BASEAVAILABLE

ARF.ALYSIGNIFICANTME ASURnE MENTSAVAILAtLE

DOUNlIINGVALUESESTIMATE)f ROM SMALLIDATA SET

SINGLE WELLsile SPECIPICMEASU1IEMENTSAVAILABLE

MOSTLYI II EIIA1 UIIEOATAAVAILA nt E

DATA $ASE EXPANDED BY ADDITIONAL CONFIRMATORY INSITUTESTIN

DATA BASE CONSISTS OF ALL LIIS TEST RESULTSES HYDROLOGY CLUSTER. TRACER ANDCIIAMBER TEST nEStULTS; AND EXTENDED.PASCO BASIN TRANSIENT MODEL |CALIBRATION

DATA BASE CONSISTS OF PRIEST nRAPIDSLNS TESTS RESULTS; ADDITIONAL 1SINGLE WELL TEST RESULTS; ANDEXTENDED PASCOBASINSTEADYSTATE MODEL CALIBRATION

I IDATA BASE CONSISTS OF'IRRL-2 LIIS TEST RESULTS j

II I IFDATA ASE CONSISITS Of *PIEZOMETIIC BASELINE 1 1 1AND SINGLE WEIL LTEST RESULTS 1 I

/ 1

/ I I I. II I

/ I ' II

.

I a ISTART SELECTED FORCONCEPrUAL DETAILEDDESIGN CIIAnACTEnI-

ZATION (STARTOF ES DRILLINGC

STARTTITLE IDESIGN

LA/SRRPREPARATION

CONSTnUCTIONAUTIIQ11ZATION

STARTREPOSITORYOPE RATIONS

I

HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION

I FY-85 I FY-86 I FY-87 I FY-88 I FY-89

PIEZOMETRIC BASELINEMONITORING (PrM)

ES-1APPROACHES E tSi-1 NQ GRAD! / INED ANDfnOHO! O GROUTED

_--I _ES-I

ES- 2 ES-2(APPROACHES /LINED AND

.GnANDE RONDE IROUTED

LJES-2

DRILLING ANDDEVELOPMENT

/ nnL-2

(+C-7DRILLING ANDDEVELOPMENT

0- - - - -0g

LARGE SCALE HYDRAULICSTRESS (ILHS) TESTS

DC-1S620. AND 22

0DTRACER TESTS

o===mmmm=mmmmwK:)

HYDROCHEMICAL SAMPLING

DC-18

DC-23

SMALL SCALE HYDRAULIC,STRESS (SMSI TESTS

0O - - - - - - - - - - -

I Mm

- ------- -- - ------ 0

DETERMINATION OF DATA ADEQUACY

REDESIGNJ i'U!RF RETEST

,//\DETERMINE

WORKI REQUIRED 7

N% ADDITIONAL/

REDUCE SITE CHAPACTER IZAT ION UtrJDERTAtN\T IES

NOT REASONABLEASSURAINCE

_

I iL

IL DESIGN' ANDTEST ENGINEERED

STRLC:TI .IREv.

SPECIFICA.TIONSurn

ASSESS OVERALLSYSTEMS PERFORMANCE

AND UNCERTAINTY

C/ COMPARE- TO REGULATION',I.

AND CRITERIAN4D DATA .ADUNCERTAIIMI ES

AI.

-

//_.

INI'EST I 'ATETHE SPITE

i i I I I

DATA /4fsIOIJNCERTAt ir iE;.

REASCY4ABLEASSURANCE

- 1END I

.

.-I

lw

GEOMECHANICS TESTING / 9 88 - 89 77mE Fr.A#E

o ROCK STRESS

o ROCK MASS MODULUS

o ROCK MASS STRENGTH

o THERMAL PROPERTIES

o GEOPHYSICAL TESTING

I

o LABORATORY TESTING

o GEOMECHANICAL MODELING

o MISC. AND DEVELOPMENT

ROCK STRESS

O IN SITU STRESS:

OVERCORING

USBM

DOOR STOP PER

CSIRO (GAG-ES) 7RIPLE AXES Crh'bes A4 2 AXS

o SKIN STRESS:

SMALL FLAT JACK TEST

ROCK MASS MODULUS

o PLATE BEARING TESTING:

RIGID

FLEXIBLE

0.5 METER PLATE

1.0 METER PLATE

o LARGE FLAT JACK

o BOREHOLE TESTING

o BLOCK TEST

ROCK MASS STRENGTH TESTING

o JOINT SHEAR TESTING

LARGE DISCONTINUITIES

COLUMN JOINTING

o G-oPtsc C D YJA(I L MO WbuJus, ) p t S WAUC-

C o Cs - Nmr

&EFALCM OLE

LAY6 7EsrAiJVP(,RPA4OJ/J po4.4s AJD FAC;C4 7Aes

. i

GEOMECHANICS MODELING

o COORDINATE MODELING PLAN WITH A/E

o BENCHMARK ADINA to'ILL PicM- uP A8AC-OSAS WEU-

o BENCHMARK STEADY FLOW

MODEL VALIDATION TESTING

o CANISTER HOLE HEATER TEST - SEUE!AL. MWINS l'OF*TiOAJAi s ITno -EsT

o MINE BY TEST

DEFLECTOMETER DEVELOPMENT

*, -

MISCELLANEOUS

a SUPPORT TESTING - RfXX i5OLr + Gepou-rjo&6 75S

O SITE SPECIFIC ROCK MASS CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEM

o COMPLETION OF:

HEATER TESTS #1 AND #2

REPORTS BoEsC eorLEM0

DEVELOPMENT OF: MET14cOs TO e EASVI L CS7ZESgS Do) FDw@Tops

O JOINTED OVERCORING

O BOREHOLE MODULUS

o TRIAXIAL SHEAR

SPECIAL TOPIC

UPPER COLD CREEK SYNCLINE

HYDROLOGIC BARRIER

4

1*

* - 4I

HANFORDBOUNDAR'

DR Y Catex

VA LEY

RSH-

. B

SITE

r Xi

n.s 06-12 *UTT 6B-9

OH-8 0 .- ~-'M-52115 os2 '1I DCt

*6 9 9 .52A I folD D-25 -1 DO LI46.11 DC-I 05-1

LJr 6B-4

699.14E6Q

0B613 0\D2* DC-8

WJPPSS-3DB-1

L:. 6DB-7

OREHOLE

1ASALT OUTCROP

MILES RICHLO

Wells with Hydrologic information(from Gephart and others, 1979)

PRIEST RAPIDS INTERFLOWHYDRAULIC HEADS (3/85) ..

UMTANUM RIDGE

II

Ni

I

McGEEI0

* DB-12

404

REFERENCEREPOSITORY

LOCATIONST. MICHELLE 20

0ST. MICHELLE I

O'BRIAN .9** FORD91 6

.915 __9_ENYEAR- IF , l

24___---I- x91_ __ _ _

*-DC4/5

DC-20

401/, BURK

COLOC½

? II

OC-22

R RRLl4

Es I RRL.2

RRL-6YAKIMA RIDGEI

MILESHYDRAULIC HEADS: ft MSLOC 16

-

too E WE ~SCLUTION fEE215L64

-. ,

VI

s51613

- IM

031- - - J- - -32-3

* i*

7- -

r;RCL1i~b4MA VERTICAL HYDRAULIC HEAD DISTRIBUTION AT THE McGEE WELL

STRRT I GRRPHY TESTINTERVAL

HYDRAULICHERD

Soo-

1100I:16

14001

1700-

WANDPPnBASALT

523e

924

gas'

Sao,

911'

9s1t

91si

sil

514s

9Se,

r880rI 06

I-10

I

I-1400

-170w

V~RTA0I4-

[tcRacc I

I

2000-isell

60a'I.-

0.

sell

2302-

T 6g0oGRANDCRONDE

BASALT1-2666

Jt2S00

L3200

2900-,

I

3200JI 597.

GOO 7 Goo gooT.10FT. MSL

GRANDE RONDE HYDRAULIC HEADS (3/85)-3

I * D8-12

I-

UMTANUM RIDGEI

'I

IREFERENCE 'REPOSITORY

LOCATIONST. MICHELLE 2

ST. MICHELLE 1

OBRIAN ** FORD

McGEE

602I

ENYEART

24 _ - - -_ - - - --of,

.I-

I_ - - -- - -

°', Coe in40S,~"ct ". -%co

402soDC-4/5

DC.20

* 404/ 3

-22* BURK

ES R L-2

, fRL-6YAKIMA RIDGE

? 2II

HYDRAULIC HEADS: ft MSL MILESt>C-16

YAKIMA BARRICADE LINEAR.

45g0 -56.7 (/ - li ,i-i~S}% -'L s. a i,

45Ll00045500 -- \ () ,

RR'*

to~o

4156

4S400Ir :T00 STAT! PLieit! F0jT

SCALEi 1:24000

a

45sw K<'E * e\ \

4s f~lom % /\\

. 7S 2193250 2 ' 1950 20750walllolsz Y z£FE 2203250 22058CA0 1s240007'0plOUREe GROUNo MAGNETIC MAP (TOTAL FIELD)

£R

v

/ AREA OF GRAVITY GRADIENT

-- I - - ....,,s

- --.----------

'

AN..

--

4

FIGMR 5. Simple Clougher Gravity Mbp (scale 1:24000?. -

t11tour Interval 0.2 oape

bq

*4 4 I

.%. I.d *.* A1 ; X,-

" Y S 2 ..- ** . _- .

Proposed Location of Hydrologic Barrier

4 t

I

-49

ZLEVATIIN

FEETmoo-

m-

40 -

200-

a j

wo

ON

M11 DH-27 DH-28 RRL-8

- L IUNDIFFERENTAT- SILT/SAND (UNDIFFERENTIATED)MIDDLE RINGOLD LOWER RINGOLD

3 - -_ OAAL HINGOLOjv. MTN.....l

RATTLESNAKE RIDGE INTERREDPOOR QUESTIONABLE 0000

QUALITY OF SEISMIC REFLECTION DATA

0 1000I I I 2000 FEETI I

Vyeo

POSSIBLE STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION FROM

DRILL HOLES DH-27 and DH-28 (MONOCLINE)

.1

a

ELEVATtON

FEET 08 11800-

eoo-

400-

20-

DH.27 DH-28 RRL4

PoOR OVESTIONABLE I GOOD

OUALSTY OF 3193MtC REFLECTION DATA

0 10_I I

2000 EESTi - f 1-

VI a I

POSSIBLE STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION FROMDRILL HOLES DH-27 AND OH-28 (FAULT)

OVERALL OBJECTIVES

# DETERMINE DIMENSIONS OF THE HYDROLOGIC BARRIER.

* DETERMINE THE PRESENT GEOLOGIC AND HYDROLOGIC

CHARACTERISTICS.

* ASSESS FUTURE GEOLOGIC AND HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS.

VA

a..

TABLE 1

FY85 OBJECTIVES AND PLANS

OBJECTIVES PLANS

1. Determine-the dorthern and southern Conduct 50 line miles of both gravityextent of geophysical gradients and magnetic surveys.(gravity and magnetics). MuLy

2. Refine location of geophysical gradients Conduct testing and verification ofand geologic interpretation with seismic seismic methodology. rn Al?reflection data.

Conduct one to three lines of seismicreflection in Yakima Barricade area(dependent on testing). Auc-Usr

3. Refine the location of the hydrologic Deepen DH-27 and DH-28 through the Selahbarrier on the basis of hydraulic head interbed.observations within the Selah interbedat DH-27 and OH-28. Install packers and piezometers in DH-27

and DH-28 to obtain head differences inthe Selah interbed and obtain water Lsamples for chemical analyses. A

4. Documentation of results.

SOME Ces HOLE to Ce Wj/L I3E Dbo0A)E ' VS eWI)tLL 6t EuXjj3Ua bfIW 704RCV 15A?-PIEO---

Compile status report and update FY86 plans.SE fT.

*

b-t .

%.�-. :�..J

i... 4 (�l

.SM f ***�* �

-,* -....

2�' �

*is.�*g Seet)

�, � -

/;

llkv -OR; ___ - , . .. , . I a

I ._

IL T... ..*, r.. -I- .

*:0

tko , ...

>Wb %"' s .*4-44C

5 IS_-i

- I 7. _

| n Ss-

L VK~, a.

-U � - - .. *

'W &GEEt .)4,

Ile%

I '**' %.. _c , .

%* -.-- IMY W�**

_ .. :e

1. 1. _ .

-I_

-m I

>.1

- -l - .4

... to. im P.S,., ^,, #-

I

' . 'I:;S' _ ..

N C

I 0

. . .

I,

I

.. ,

4',

IP@_ -1 q

___ -. .. - S..-

W I s

IIl

_ \J'

... A.

_ -.. _ . t. "a

II-

_0

% 014.4

\Aml

9 '4- I

I2 -

_, IG E.,

, _- _ - a

REFERENCE REPOSITORY LOCATION

I-.

I

I. _ . 1 -.

a-lqt W.,.

_ _ _ - I ** .,-) -~ ~ .. , ~ - .

-. ~ I~ &*s

= =

I I I _- ,- . , w

0 .5 1 AI

- - -

2WILES

KILOMETERS

LEGENDGRAVITY & MAGNETICS

:.... SEISMIC REFLECT1ON (WITH VERTICAL--- -... .SEISM IC PROFILE IN PH1 7 014.28) --a I. - - 2 3'9

PLANNED GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS-FOR YAKIMA BARRICADE STUDY FY-85

b I I a

I .I CZ

O 1 .u SW

rus..s.4J\ -

INCr-v'*-~<

-R --I- - - - - -- I.3.

--- - - - - --- -- ,_ ---- -

--- - ---------

- --- - - - - - - -

-- - - - - - - - - -

GRDDGAVIT RPSITRVY LCA-…r

-'-- -- - --- -…

…- - - - -----

, 1 _, '. .Io====

_i~s . *° 1-1' ; ; -~. .. ~ @_

>-lrsK ~t …~~ -- _ _ _ _ _==_

rv ^ {E ^.. -=>: -_=====--===. ~~ .- , , 5w\…__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ,

.,>._E / ?n > \ - == = == === ===…

0 5 t 2 MILESLEGEND

- GRAVITY & MAGNETICS*:: .-. :. SEISMIC REFLECTION (WITH VERTICAL... S SEISMIC PROFILE IN DIH27 & OH-R)-- PREVIOUS GRAVITYWMAGNETIC DATA

_

U I 2 3 KILGMETERKN

PREVIOUS AND PLANNED GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

.

TABLE 2

OVERALL OBJECTIVES AND GENERAL PLANS FOR FY86+

'iil

OBJECTIVES or PLANS

1. Determine location and dimensions ofhydrologic barrier.

Locate and drill 3 wells into thePriest Rapids for constant dischargepumping tests and hydrochemical analyses.

Assess need for additional wells forconstant discharge pumping tests on basisof initial tests.

Assess need for additional geophysicsand seismic data on basis of initialtests.

2. Determine present geologic andhydrologic characteristics.

Assess structure through boreholeverification

A. Structure Verification

1 to 3 boreholes to a maximum depthof 1500 feet

B. Age Determination of Last Activity

2-10 closely spaced boreholesthrough sediments

Assess hydraulic properties of thestructure through additional hydrologictesting at different scales.

3. Determine future geologic and hydrologic Develop conceptual and numerical models.characteristics.

4. Documentation of Results Compile status reports and update plans;compile final report.

.1 A.-

IA.

Structures, Textures, andCooling Histories ofColumbia River Basalt Flows

Date Manuscript Completed: May 1984

P. E. LongBasalt Waste Isolation Project

B.J.WoodNorthwestern UniversityEvanston, Illinois

To be submitted toGeological Society of America Bulletin

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energyunder Contract DE-AC06-77RL01030

OD Rockwell InternationalftckweONwor MOpwdEnwlmnu SG~moupP.O. oxOOftdWnhk"69352

RHO-BW-SA-212 P